Development of a scale to assess nurses' difficulties in collaborating with physicians in responding to clinical deterioration during night shifts.

AIMS: To develop a scale to assess difficulties that nurses experience when collaborating with physicians in responding to clinical deterioration during night shifts and identify factors associated with scoring using the developed scale. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire with a draft scale, the Nighttime Collaboration Difficulties between Nurses and Physicians for Nurses (NCDNP-N), was distributed to nurses working night shifts in acute-care hospitals across Japan. Data were collected between July and October 2023. Of 435 responses, 405 were examined for the NCDNP-N's psychometric validation, including structural validity, criterion-related validity, and reliability assessments. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed for 385 responses excluded by listwise methods to identify factors associated with NCDNP-N scores. RESULTS: The NCDNP-N has 10 items and three domains: Domain 1, dissatisfaction with physicians' actions; Domain 2, burden of working with night-shift physicians; and Domain 3, barriers to reporting during night shifts. Estimated reliability coefficients exceeded the recommended values. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that more years of experience in the current ward and frequency of calling the covering physician at night were markedly associated with higher scores, whereas more nursing experience was associated with lower scores. CONCLUSION: We developed the NCDNP-N and confirmed its validity and reliability. The study results suggest that the responsibilities and competence of nurses working night shifts and communication with the night-covering physician are associated with difficulties in nighttime collaboration. The NCDNP-N may help identify challenges in clinical settings as well as can be utilized in the evaluation study for improving nighttime collaboration.

Perceptions and Behaviors of Nurses and Physicians During Bedside Rounds in Medical-Surgical Units.

BACKGROUND: Communication and collaboration among health care professionals during bedside rounds improve patient outcomes and nurses' and physicians' satisfaction. OBJECTIVES: To determine barriers to nurse-physician communication during bedside rounds and identify opportunities to improve nurse-physician collaboration at an academic medical center. METHODS: A survey with Likert-scale and open-ended questions regarding professional attitudes toward nurse-physician communication was administered to 220 nurses and physicians in medical-surgical units to assess perceptions of participation in bedside rounds. After the survey was given, observational data from 1007 bedside rounds were collected via a standardized data collection tool. RESULTS: Nurses and physicians perceived different barriers to including nurses in bedside rounds. Nurses most often cited being unaware that bedside rounds were occurring (38 of 46 nurses [83%]); physicians most often cited nurse unavailability (43 of 52 physicians [83%]). Of 1007 observed rounds, 602 (60%) involved in-person contact of nurses and physicians; 418 (69%) of the 602 included a conversation between the nurse and physician about the nurse's concerns. Of 355 rounds with no in-person or telephone contact between nurses and physicians, the medicine team did not contact the nurse in 284 (80%). Conversations about nurses' concerns occurred more often after physician-initiated contacts (73% of 369 contacts) and nurse-initiated contacts (74% of 93 contacts) than after chance encounters (57% of 140 contacts). CONCLUSION: Initiating discussions of care between nurses and physicians and discussing nurses' concerns during bedside rounds have multiple benefits.

Survey on nurse-physician communication gaps focusing on diagnostic concerns and reasons for silence.

Diagnosis improvement requires physician-nurse collaboration. This study explored nurses' concerns regarding physicians' diagnoses and how they were communicated to physicians. This cross-sectional study, employing a web-based questionnaire, included nurses registered on Japan's largest online media site from June 26, 2023, to July 31, 2023. The survey inquired whether participants felt concerned about a physician's diagnosis within a month, if they communicated their concerns once they arose, and, if not, their reasons. The reasons for not being investigated were also examined. The nurses' frequency of feeling concerned about a physician's diagnosis and the barriers to communicating these concerns to the physician were evaluated. Overall, 430 nurses answered the survey (female, 349 [81.2%]; median age, 45 [35-51] years; median years of experience, 19 [12-25]). Of the nurses, 61.2% experienced concerns about a physician's diagnosis within the past month; 52.5% felt concerned but did not communicate this to the physician. The most common reasons for not communicating included concern about the physician's pride, being ignored when communicating, and the nurse not believing that a diagnosis should be made. Our results highlight the need to foster psychologically safe workplaces for nurses and create educational programs encouraging nurse involvement in diagnosis.

Applying ordered network analysis to video-recorded physician-nurse interactions to examine communication patterns associated with shared understanding in inpatient oncology care settings.

OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study was to demonstrate how ordered network analysis of video-recorded interactions combined with verbal response mode (VRM) coding (eg, edification, disclosure, reflection and interpretation) can uncover specific communication patterns that contribute to the development of shared understanding between physicians and nurses. The major hypothesis was that dyads that reached shared understanding would exhibit different sequential relationships between VRM codes compared with dyads that did not reach shared understanding. DESIGN: Observational study design with the secondary analysis of video-recorded interactions. SETTING: The study was conducted on two oncology units at a large Midwestern academic health care system in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 33 unique physician-nurse dyadic interactions were included in the analysis. Participants were the physicians and nurses involved in these interactions during patient care rounds. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the development of shared understanding between physicians and nurses, as determined by prior qualitative analysis. Secondary measures included the frequencies, orders and co-occurrences of VRM codes in the interactions. RESULTS: A Mann-Whitney U test showed that dyads that reached shared understanding (N=6) were statistically significantly different (U=148, p=0.00, r=0.93) from dyads that did not reach shared understanding (N=25) in terms of the sequential relationships between edification and disclosure, edification and advisement, as well as edification and questioning. Dyads that reached shared understanding engaged in more edification followed by disclosure, suggesting the importance of this communication pattern for reaching shared understanding. CONCLUSIONS: This novel methodology demonstrates a robust approach to inform interventions that enhance physician-nurse communication. Further research could explore applying this approach in other healthcare settings and contexts.

[Collaboration between advanced practice nurses and physicians: a tool to enhance the care offered]. / La collaboration entre l'IPA et le médecin, un outil au service de l'offre de soins.

The role of advanced practice nursing in France is still in its definition phase. While the prefiguration of the model was mainly in primary care, notably through the activities of the Asalée association, the first university graduates are mainly future hospital professionals, with a specialized orientation. Whether working in general or organ medicine, the advanced practice nurse (APN) is committed to making the patient's care experience more fluid, as part of a multi-professional team. Thanks to the acquisition of new skills and a structuring legal framework, collaboration between doctors and APNs is becoming a lace-making process, to best meet local needs.

Sequential Mediation Effects of Organizational Support and Collaboration on Missed Nursing Care.

BACKGROUND: It is necessary to find ways to mediate the relationship between role overload and missed nursing care in settings where nursing staffing is inadequate. This study aimed to identify the single and multiple sequential mediation effects of organizational support, nurse-physician collaboration, and nurse-nurse collaboration on the relationship between role overload and missed nursing care. METHODS: Data were collected from 237 registered Korean nurses working in general wards in October 2022. The measures used were the modified role overload scale, nurse-physician collaboration scale, nurse-nurse collaboration scale, a short version of the Perceived Organizational Support Scale, and the modified Missed Nursing Care Scale. Data were analyzed using PROCESS macro in SPSS. A hypothesis test was performed using Model 81, proposed by Hayes, which includes serial multiple mediators. RESULTS: Organizational support, nurse-physician collaboration, and nurse-nurse collaboration showed a mediation effect on missed nursing care. Organizational support, nurse-physician collaboration, and nurse-nurse collaboration showed significant multiple sequential mediation effects on the relationship between role overload and missed nursing care. When the indirect effect sizes of nurse-physician collaboration were compared with those of nurse-nurse collaboration in both single and multiple sequential mediation paths, the indirect effect of nurse-physician collaboration was greater than that of nurse-nurse collaboration on the relationship between role overload and missed nursing care. CONCLUSIONS: As an alternative strategy to reduce missed nursing care in situations with insufficient nursing staffing, organizational support should precede nurse-physician and nurse-nurse collaboration. In particular, improving nurse-physician collaboration shows promise in mitigating missed nursing care.

Association between the Quantity of Nurse-Doctor Interprofessional Collaboration and in-Patient Mortality: A Systematic Review.

The level of nurse-doctor interprofessional collaboration may influence patient outcomes, including mortality. To date, no systematic reviews have investigated the association between the quantity of nurse-doctor interprofessional collaboration and inpatient mortality. A systematic review was conducted. We included studies that measured the quantity of nurse-doctor interprofessional collaboration and in-patient mortality. Five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Register) were searched. Two researchers undertook the title, abstract, and full-text screening. The risk of bias was determined using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) critical appraisal tool. Six reports from three observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Participants included 1.32 million patients, 29,591 nurses, and 191 doctors. The included studies had a high risk of bias. Of the three studies, one reported a significant association and one found no association between the quantity of nurse-doctor collaboration and mortality. The third study reported on the quantity of nurse-doctor collaboration but did not report the test of this association. We found no high-quality evidence to suggest the amount of nurse-doctor interprofessional collaboration was associated with mortality in medical and surgical inpatients. There is a need for further high-quality research to evaluate the association between the amount of nurse-doctor collaboration and patient outcomes.

Addressing the Nursing Workforce Crisis Through Nurse-Physician Collaboration.

This Viewpoint explores root causes of the nurse staffing shortages in the US and proposes solutions that involve physicians.

Interprofessional collaboration in telemedicine for long-term care: An exploratory qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Widespread and sustained adoption of telemedicine in long-term residential care is emerging. Nursing home (NH) nurses play a key role in collaborating with remote physicians to manage residents' medical conditions through videoconferencing. Therefore, understanding of interprofessional collaboration and effective communication between nurses and physicians is critical to ensure quality of care and safety during teleconsultations. AIMS: To explore NH nurses' and physicians' experiences of interprofessional collaboration and communication during teleconsultations. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design was adopted. Purposive sampling was conducted to recruit 22 physicians and nurses involved in NH teleconsultations. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted, and data were thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: (1) Manner of communication in telemedicine, (2) sociocultural influences in collaborative practice, and (3) role expectations in telemedicine. Both nurses and physicians recognized the importance of building and maintaining trust as physicians heavily depended on nurses for provision of objective information for clinical decision-making. However, practice differences were observed between nurses and physicians during teleconsultations. Sociocultural influences such as power relations and language barriers also affected the nurse-physician relationship and interpersonal communication. Additionally, different performance expectations were identified between nurses and physicians. CONCLUSION: Interprofessional collaboration in teleconsultations is challenging because of lack of in-person assessment and dependence on nurses for clinical information. In addition, expectations and communication styles differ among healthcare professionals. This study called for interprofessional telemedicine training with incorporation of shared mental models to improve role clarity and communication. Given the international-dominated healthcare workforce in long-term care, the development of cultural competency could also be considered in telemedicine training to enhance nurse-physician collaborative practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Telemedicine is increasingly adopted in long-term care settings, where multidisciplinary healthcare professionals from different health institutions are involved in resident care. Interprofessional collaboration should be incorporated into telehealth education for enhanced clinical practice in this care delivery model.

Inter-professional collaboration and associated factors among nurses and physicians in specialized public hospitals, the northwest, Ethiopia: mixed method multi-centered cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate inter-professional collaboration and associated factors among nurses and physicians working in referral and teaching hospitals in the Northwest and Ethiopia in 2022. METHOD: This study used a concurrent (quantitative cross-sectional and phenomenological qualitative) design from September to October 2022. A structured, self-administered nurse-physician collaborative scale questionnaire was used to collect quantitative data from 279 nurses and 87 physicians. A simple random sampling technique was used to select participants. The magnitude of the association was measured using the odds ratio at a 95% confidence interval and was statistically significant at a p-value less than 0.05 using binary logistic regression analysis. Qualitative data were collected from nine key informants via focused interviews or semi-structured in-depth interviews and analyzed using ATLAS.ti version 7.0.7 software via narratives using the thematic analysis method. RESULT: According to the study's findings, a greater number (43.4%) of the respondents had ineffective collaboration during their professional activities. In the final model of multivariable analysis, unsatisfactory organizational support, poor professional support, and poor interpersonal support were all independently associated with ineffective collaboration. The qualitative findings identified poor communication, a lack of professionalism, and failure to adhere to professional duties as barriers to nurse-physician collaboration. CONCLUSION: In this study, nurse-physician collaboration was less than expected; thus, the large number of participants had ineffective collaborations. Potential predictors of decreased effective nurse-physician collaboration included dissatisfaction with organizational support, poor professional support, and poor interpersonal support. This outcome emphasizes the importance of improving nurse-physician collaboration by enhancing organizational, professional, and interpersonal factors to form effective collaborative practice. The qualitative finding supports the quantitative study, which showed ineffective collaboration. The authors recommended that there is a need to empower interprofessional collaboration among nurses and physicians through the creation of a conducive and safe working environment.

Interprofessional team-based collaboration between designated GPs and care home staff: a qualitative study in an urban Danish setting.

BACKGROUND: Being a general practitioner for residents in many care homes may challenge communication with residents, relatives, and care home staff, and potentially lead to lower quality of care. Several countries have therefore introduced different solutions to reduce the number of general practitioners at each care home. In 2017, the designated general practitioner model was introduced at many Danish care homes. This study aimed to evaluate experiences from the interprofessional team-based collaboration between designated general practitioners and care home staff with regular contact with the designated general practitioners in an urban Danish setting. METHODS: A qualitative design was applied using semi-structured interviews. Eight interviews (three group interviews and five individual interviews) were conducted with four designated general practitioners and seven care home staff members at four care homes in an urban setting of Central Denmark Region, Denmark. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, and data were analysed using content analysis with inspiration from the theory of relational coordination. The study followed the guidelines addressed in the COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) framework. RESULTS: The initiation of the designated general practitioner model was experienced to contribute to more clear, precise, and timely communication between care homes and the general practitioner. An improved mutual acknowledgement of roles and competencies was experienced between designated general practitioners, care home nurses, and sometimes also social and health care assistants. The more frequent visits by the general practitioners at the care homes, as a result of the designated general practitioner model, resulted in more face-to-face communication between care home staff and designated general practitioners. Professional differences in the interpretation of the patient's needs were still present, which at times caused a frustrating compromise of own professional competencies. An important reason for the overall perception of improved collaboration was attributed to the more frequent dialogue in which the care homes staff and the designated general practitioners exchanged knowledge that could be applied in future patient encounters. CONCLUSION: The designated general practitioner model implied an improved collaboration between general practitioners and care homes staff. Clear, precise, and timely communication between care homes and the general practitioners, as well as mutual trust and acknowledgement was experienced to be essential for the collaboration. An important reason for the overall perception of an improved collaboration was attributed to the more frequent dialogue (more frequent general practitioner visits at the care homes) in which the care homes staff and the designated general practitioners exchange knowledge which again could be applied in future patient encounters.

Physician-Nurse and Nurse-Nurse Collaboration From the Perspective of Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.

The study aims to determine the physician-nurse and nurse-nurse collaboration levels of nurses and effective factors. A cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 477 nurses from five hospitals using a questionnaire. It was determined that the characteristics of working life explained 10% of the Nurse-Nurse Collaboration Scale and the regression model between variables and the Jefferson Scale of Attitudes Toward Physician-Nurse Collaboration was not statistically significant. Physician-nurse and nurse-nurse collaboration are affected by a variety of factors.

Organizational support and Nurse-Physician collaboration during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: A qualitative study.

Health care professionals experienced multiple uncertainties during the pandemic. Exploring health care professionals' views about collaboration and organizational support can offer insights into organizational processes and issues during the pandemic. This research explored the perspectives of nurses and physicians about organizational support and nurse-physician collaboration during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Using a qualitative descriptive design, interviews were conducted with nurses and physicians working in hospital settings. The interviews lasted for 24-61 min. Reflexive thematic analysis was used for data analysis. Nurses and physicians were disappointed with the organizational support, but they were satisfied with nurse-physician collaboration. The theme "Management Abusing Authority and Blaming the Victimized Workforce" included organizational nepotism, unethical managerial actions, and neglecting frontline workforce. Nurses and physicians supported each other in tackling the intensive and complex demands of the pandemic. The theme "Demonstrating Professional Humility and Overcoming Patient Care Issues at Hand" entailed subthemes - negotiating conflicts and prioritizing patient care, practicing kindness, and jointly managing conflicts with patients' families. Nurses and physicians reported frustrations with limited organizational support and abusive practices of managers. Still, they prioritized patient care needs and family-related conflicts over interprofessional tensions.

The contribution of professional autonomy in advancing ethical behaviour: A narrative review of studies in nursing.

AIM: This article explores moral disagreements between nurses and physicians; specifically, we aim to analyse professional nurses' practice in navigating these conflicts. BACKGROUND: Nurses face morally challenging situations while caring for patients when their views on treatments and care may contradict those of physicians. It is important that nurses represent patients' perspectives and are partners in the care decision-making process. EVALUATION: A narrative review was conducted by including peer-reviewed articles in English. A literature search was conducted using the Web of Science database and Google Scholar search engine from 1 December 2021 to 10 February 2022. KEY ISSUES: A total of 27 articles published between 2009 and 2021 were included in the analysis. The following themes were explored in this article: areas in which moral disagreements occur and how these disagreements shape physician-nurse relationships, differences in the status of professional autonomy in nursing in the Baltic states and Nordic countries, and potential directions for nurses' involvement in the decision-making process regarding moral disagreements in nursing practice. CONCLUSIONS: Moral disagreements between nurses and physicians most often occur in situations related to treatment and/or care strategies as well as end-of-life decisions. Nurses' participation in the decision-making process and physicians' willingness to consider nurses' perspectives play a fundamental role in navigating moral conflicts because nurses possess a body of knowledge about their patients that differs from that of physicians. This knowledge is just as worthy as physician knowledge. Considering the level of professional autonomy in specific regions, nurses' involvement in decision-making regarding particular patients' care in the Baltic states seems to be relatively low compared to that in the Scandinavian countries, where nurses have a much wider space for independent decision-making. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Complex moral situations that require the input of both physicians and nurses must be examined and addressed. Several processes may assist in fostering nurses' contributions to decision-making, among which training to effectively deal with morally complex situations and creating an atmosphere conducive to collaboration between physicians and nurses are particularly important.

Interprofessional Precepting: A Nursing-Medicine Partnership.

Interprofessional precepting can advance team-based collaboration. We evaluated the impact of nurse-led precepting of medical students on perceptions of nurse-physician relationships. Forty-six frontline nurses precepted 73 third year medical students in New York for a three-part clinical and classroom experience. Nurse preceptor and medical student attitudes toward healthcare teams and medical student attitudes toward nurse-physician collaboration improved after participation using validated scales. This pilot study suggests nurse-led interprofessional precepting can improve attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration.

State-level scope of practice regulations for nurse practitioners impact work environments: Six state investigation.

Nurse practitioner (NP) scope of practice (SOP) policies are different across the United States. Little is known about their impact on NP work environment in healthcare organizations. We investigated the association between SOP policies and organizational-level work environment of NPs. Through a cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 1244 NPs in six states with variable SOP regulations (Arizona, New Jersey, Washington, Pennsylvania, Texas, and California) in 2018-2019. Arizona and Washington had full SOP-NPs had full authority to deliver care. New Jersey and Pennsylvania had reduced SOP with physician collaboration requirement; California and Texas had restricted SOP with physician supervision requirement. NPs completed mail or online surveys containing the Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Organizational Climate Questionnaire, which has these subscales: NP-Administration Relations (NP-AR), NP-Physician Relations (NP-PR), Independent Practice and Support (IPS), and Professional Visibility (PV). Regression models assessed the relationship between state-level SOP and practice-level NP work environment. NP-AR scores were higher in full SOP states compared to reduced (ß = 0.22, p < 0.01) and restricted (ß = 0.15, p < 0.01) SOP states. Similarly, IPS scores were higher in full SOP states. The PV scores were also higher in full SOP states compared to reduced (ß = 0.16, p < 0.001) and restricted (ß = 0.12, p < 0.05) SOP states. There was no relationship between SOP and NP-PR score. State-level policies affect NP work environment. In states with more favorable policies, NPs have better relationships with administration and report more role visibility and support. Efforts should be made to remove unnecessary SOP restrictions.

A qualitative exploration of nurse-physician collaboration in intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Effective nurse-physician collaboration is associated with superior patient outcomes and improved job satisfaction for both nurses and physicians. OBJECTIVES: This qualitative study explored factors that contribute to nurse-physician collaboration in critical care. Using a qualitative descriptive design, in-depth interviews were conducted with intensive care unit physicians and nurses. Four physicians and six nurses were interviewed between November 2018 and February 2019. Using an iterative process, data analysis occurred after each interview and Lincoln & Guba's Trustworthiness criteria was used to establish validity. FINDINGS: The importance of effective collaboration was emphasized by all nurses and physicians who participated in this study. All participants emphasized the importance of communication and linked effective collaboration to better patient outcomes. Nurses valued respect while physicians stressed the importance of relationships. Both nurses and physicians identified multidisciplinary rounds as the best mechanism for collaboration. Collaboration was also linked to both nurse and physician job satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Effective nurse-physician collaboration is essential to a healthy work environment and optimal patient outcomes. Collaboration improves with the implementation of multidisciplinary rounds. This is the first study to examine this relationship using a qualitative approach. Regardless of health system, both nurses and physicians value effective collaboration. Efforts should be made to invest in activities to improve this relationship. IMPACT: Intenisve care units with effective collaboration are associated with superior patient outcomes. This study used an intimate approach to examine nurses' and physicians' perceptions on collaboration which provided candid and provoking opinions.

Expanding nurses' authority - Physicians' and nurses' attitudes.

AIM: To examine and compare the attitudes of physicians and registered nurses regarding extending nurses' authority. DESIGN: This was a comparative quantitative study, which used a questionnaire that examined the attitudes of nurses and physicians regarding expanding nurses' authority. METHODS: The study comprised a sample of 134 nurses (62.7%) and physicians (37.3%), who filled out the self-report questionnaire that included sociodemographic data and questions designed to examine the participants' attitudes and perceptions on expanding nurses' authority. The general reliability of the questionnaire was Cronbach's α = 0.931. Participants were sampled through the convenience-snowball method. RESULTS: Differences were found between the attitudes of physicians and nurses to expanding nurses' authority. Nurses tended to be in favor, whereas physicians tended to be against (t(86.29) = 7.713; p < 0.05). Nurses' attitudes are also more positive specifically to procedures related to drug administration (t(132) = 6.894; p < 0.05) and resuscitation (t(132) = 2.974; p < 0.05), compared to physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses have more positive attitudes toward expanding nurses' authority than physicians do, specifically toward drug administration and resuscitation. Further study is proposed to identify factors which affect the physician-nurse relationship and attitudes on a large scale through a qualitative study.