INDIVIDUAL ARTICLE: Skincare in Skin of Color: A Comprehensive Approach to Preprocedure, Intraprocedure, and Postprocedure.

Hyperpigmentation, uneven skin tone, textural changes, and dull skin are common cosmetic concerns in skin of color. Other signs of aging, including fine lines, deeper wrinkles, and skin laxity, also occur but may present in later decades. In-office procedures such as laser treatments, energy devices, toxins, fillers, and chemical peels are useful options for addressing the most common cosmetic concerns in skin of color patients. Skincare can play an important role in improving cosmetic outcomes when used in conjunction with in-office procedures. With the availability of these approaches, clinicians can now integrate in-office procedures with skincare strategies to offer patients with skin of color a comprehensive treatment plan that meets their needs. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23:8(Suppl 1):s5-10.

A 52-week follow-up, multi-center, randomized, double-blinded comparison of efficacy and safety of two hyaluronic acid fillers for the treatment of moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds in Chinese population.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the efficacy and safety of Cutegel® MAX (Cutegel) in the correction of moderate-to-severe nasolabial folds (NLFS) compared to Restylane® (Restylane, control). METHODS: This study was a 52-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled clinical trial. Qualified participants with moderate-to-severe NLFs were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive Cutegel or Restylane. For the primary efficacy endpoint, the response rate was defined as the percentage of subjects exhibiting an improvement of at least one-point based on blinded evaluation of Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at 24 weeks after injection. Other secondary efficacy endpoints and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. RESULTS: Of 340 subjects randomized, 317 completed the week 52 visit. In the per protocol set (PPS), the blinded evaluator-assessed response rates at week 24 were 81.17% for Cutegel versus 77.56% for Restylane (p = 0.327). The between-group treatment differences in response rates were 3.60% [95% confidence interval (CI) = (-5.39%, 12.60%)], which demonstrated the noninferiority of Cutegel. Other secondary efficacy endpoints supported this. No significant differences were observed in the occurrence of adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Similar to Restylane, Cutegel was effective and well tolerated in correcting moderate-to-severe NLFs among the Chinese population.

Nasolabial folds (NLFs) are among the early indicators of facial aging process. In the past, rhytidectomy has been considered a safe procedure, yet it continues to carry risks such as hematoma, skin necrosis, nerve injury, and infection. With the ongoing development of biomaterials including hyaluronic acid (HA), minimally invasive injection procedures for the aesthetic correction of NLFs have become the preferred choice in recent years. The widespread use of HA has resulted in the development of various types of commercial HA fillers, such as Cutegel and Restylane. It is well known that HA filler products produce varying effects, attributable to differences in their components and physical properties. Previous studies have established that Restylane is a safe and effective HA dermal filler for the correction of NLFs. However, there is a lack of studies on both the cosmetic results and safety data for Cutegel in the published literature. Therefore, a randomized, double-blinded, active-controlled clinical trial was conducted at seven Chinese hospitals to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cutegel for the correction of moderate-to-severe NLFs, compared to the approved Restylane in China. Among the 340 randomized subjects, 170 subjects received Cutegel, and 169 subjects received Restylane. Both groups reported similar improvements in WSRS (the between-group treatment differences in response rates exceeded the prespecified noninferiority margins), and also in other efficacy evaluations. Additionally, the two treatment groups showed similar safety profiles. In summary, Cutegel proved to be well tolerated and effective in this randomized, active-controlled clinical study, demonstrating its noninferiority to Restylane and validating its use as an alternative treatment for Chinese subjects with moderate-to-severe NLFs.

A Prospective, Multicenter, Evaluator-Blinded, Randomized Study of Diluted Calcium Hydroxylapatite to Treat Decollete Wrinkles.

BACKGROUND: Calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) dermal filler is used for a variety of aesthetic treatments; however, the safety and effectiveness of diluted CaHA for the treatment of décolleté wrinkles have not been established. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of diluted CaHA (Radiesse; 1:2 CaHA:saline) injection for the improvement of décolleté wrinkles in females. METHODS: Eligible females with moderate or severe ratings on the Merz Aesthetic Scale (MAS) Decollete Wrinkles - At Rest received up to 3 injection cycles of diluted CaHA either 8 weeks apart (3 injection cycles) or 16 weeks apart (2 injection cycles). Effectiveness was evaluated by improvement on the MAS. Adverse events were recorded over a 52 week period. RESULTS: Sixteen weeks after the last treatment, the response rate (1-point improvement or greater) on the MAS Decollete Wrinkles - At Rest was 73.5% (P<0.0001; pooled sample) for all patients. The use of diluted CaHA in the decollete also demonstrated a favorable safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Diluted CaHA is a safe and effective treatment for the improvement of decollete wrinkles in females.J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(7):551-556.  doi:10.36849/JDD.8261.

Intracorporeal evaluation of hyaluronic acid fillers with varied rheological properties and correlations with aesthetic outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the differences in soft tissue filler rheology and how these properties can impact clinical results is a fundamental concepts for any injector. This study aimed to assess the tissue integration characteristics of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers manufactured with different technologies (Non-Animal Stabilized HA [HA-N] or Optimal Balance Technology [HA-O]) using ultra-high-frequency ultrasound. METHODS: Twelve female participants with mild-to-moderate midface volume loss and temporal hollowing were enrolled and treated with HA-N and/or HA-O. Participants were seen at five visits (screening/baseline [treatment], and Weeks 1 [optional touch-up], 4, 6, and 8 [follow-up visits]). Ultrasound was used to evaluate the degree of product integration. RESULTS: On ultrasound, HA-N presented with distinct borders, minimal tissue integration, and a capacity to displace tissues. Conversely, HA-O tended to spread horizontally within the same tissue plane and integrated within tissues. The volumizing capacity of the HA-O fillers was dependent on particle size. CONCLUSION: HA-N is suited for deep injections in areas such as the upper lateral cheek and under the muscle of the temporal region when a lifting effect is desired; HA-O is best suited for subcutaneous injections, in areas of dynamic movement or for patients with thin skin; and can be injected subcutaneously or supraperiosteally when a volumizing effect is desired.

Facial Implants in Male Rejuvenation.

Many different methods achieve male facial augmentation. Arranged from shorter- to longer-term results, these methods include filler, fat/tissue grafting, fat/tissue transposition, and alloplastic implants. This study solely reviews allografts, which provide the most predictable hard-tissue augmentation. An array of alloplasts will be discussed in this study including chin, cheek, mandibular angle, frontal, and temporal implants. The most common and severe complications will also be explored with preventative and treatment algorithms.

Male Rejuvenation: Injectables.

The use of injectables can effectively treat the areas of greatest facial esthetic concern in males. Due to significant differences in the facial anatomy of men compared to women, treatment strategy, dosage, and technique differs. This article will review the pharmacology, preparation, pertinent anatomy, technique, risks, and adverse events associated with injectable agents emphasizing unique differences in male anatomy and esthetics.

Poly-l-lactic acid microspheres delay aging of epidermal stem cells in rat skin.

Objective: Injectable skin fillers offer a wider range of options for cutaneous anti-aging and facial rejuvenation. PLLA microspheres are increasingly favored as degradable and long-lasting fillers. The present study focused solely on the effect of PLLA on dermal collagen, without investigating its impact on the epidermis. In this study, we investigated the effects of PLLA microspheres on epidermal stem cells (EpiSCs). Methods: Different concentrations of PLLA microspheres on epidermal stem cells (EpiSCs) in vitro through culture, and identification of primary rat EpiSCs. CCK-8 detection, apoptosis staining, flow cytometry, Transwell assay, wound healing assay, q-PCR analysis, and immunofluorescence staining were used to detect the effects of PLLA on EpiSCs. Furthermore, we observed the effect on the epidermis by injecting PLLA into the dermis of the rat skin in vivo. Results: PLLA microspheres promote cell proliferation and migration while delaying cell senescence and maintaining its stemness. In vitro, Intradermal injection of PLLA microspheres in the rat back skin resulted in delayed aging, as evidenced by histological and immunohistochemical staining of the skin at 2, 4, and 12 weeks of follow-up. Conclusion: This study showed the positive effects of PLLA on rat epidermis and EpiSCs, while providing novel insights into the anti-aging mechanism of PLLA.

A morphological analysis of calcium hydroxylapatite and poly-l-lactic acid biostimulator particles.

Injectable fillers, pivotal in aesthetic medicine, have evolved significantly with recent trends favoring biostimulators like calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA-CMC; Radiesse, Merz Aesthetics, Raleigh, NC) and poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA; Sculptra Aesthetics, Galderma, Dallas, TX). This study aims to compare the particle morphology of these two injectables and examine its potential clinical implications. Utilizing advanced light and scanning electron microscopy techniques, the physical characteristics of CaHA-CMC and PLLA particles were analyzed, including shape, size, circularity, roundness, aspect ratio, and quantity of phagocytosable particles. The findings reveal several morphological contrasts: CaHA-CMC particles exhibited a smooth, homogenous, spherical morphology with diameters predominantly ranging between 20 and 45 µm, while PLLA particles varied considerably in shape and size, appearing as micro flakes ranging from 2 to 150 µm in major axis length. The circularity and roundness of CaHA-CMC particles were significantly higher compared to PLLA, indicating a more uniform shape. Aspect ratio analysis further underscored these differences, with CaHA-CMC particles showing a closer resemblance to circles, unlike the more oblong PLLA particles. Quantification of the phagocytosable content of both injectables revealed a higher percentage of phagocytosable particles in PLLA. These morphological distinctions may influence the tissue response to each treatment. CaHA-CMC's uniform, spherical particles may result in reduced inflammatory cell recruitment, whereas PLLA's heterogeneous particle morphology may evoke a more pronounced inflammatory response.

'Magic cosmetic fillers': Appearance-enhancement effects on self-face recognition.

People naturally exhibit a self-serving bias which can be observed in their tendency to judge their own physical attractiveness more favourably than that of others. Despite this positive self-perception, minimally invasive cosmetic injectable procedures for facial rejuvenation and enhancement are becoming increasingly common. It remains unclear, however, whether recognizing an altered version of one's own face, enhanced cosmetically, correlates with a positive view of cosmetic surgery and excessive preoccupations about physical characteristics perceived as defects (body dysmorphic concerns). In this study, 30 healthy female participants, aged 18-24 years (Mage = 21.1 years, SD = 1.6), engaged in a face recognition task during which their faces were digitally morphed with that of gender-matched unfamiliar women who had undergone cosmetic enhancements, specifically lip and cheek fillers. The duration of exposure to these modified faces varied with short (500 msec) and long (2000 msec) viewing periods. Participants were asked to identify whether the digital morphs represented themselves or the other woman. Self-reports regarding acceptance of cosmetic surgery and dysmorphic concerns were collected. Participants PSE indicated a tendency towards self-bias under short presentation times, shifting towards the other as presentation times lengthened. Interestingly, this effect was associated with greater acceptance of cosmetic surgery and higher body dysmorphic concerns. This study underscores the importance of understanding how perceptions of others' physical appearances can influence self-recognition and attitudes towards cosmetic surgery, which may have both positive and potentially harmful implications.

Hand Rejuvenation with Customizable Hybrid Fillers: Premixed Calcium Hydroxyapatite and Hyaluronic Acid.

INTRODUCTION: Hand aging is a prevalent concern characterized by the atrophy of local soft tissues and increased visibility of vessels and tendons. Hyaluronic acid (HA) and calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) are well-established treatments for addressing this issue. While hybrid filler containing HA and CaHA has been proposed for facial rejuvenation, studies investigating its efficacy for hand rejuvenation are lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of a premixed hybrid filler containing calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) and hyaluronic acid (HA) for hand rejuvenation. METHODS: A prospective, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted. The control arm (CA) received conventional subdermal treatment with CaHA at a 1:1 dilution. The intervention arm (IA) underwent hybrid treatment, consisting of CaHA at a 1:1 dilution combined with 1 ml of low-density HA. Evaluation was performed subjectively using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) and the Manchester Hand Grading System (MHGS), and objectively using cutometry, corneometry, and ultrasound. RESULTS: Both the CA and the IA exhibited high rates of patient satisfaction and satisfaction as assessed by blinded evaluators. Although numerical superiority was observed in the IA, no statistical difference was found between the two groups. Significant improvements in hydration, elasticity, and skin thickness were observed in both arms, with no discernible difference between them. Greater ultrasound echogenicity was noted in the IA, which, as indicated by existing literature, may suggest enhanced biostimulation. No adverse effects were reported in either arm. CONCLUSION: Premixed filler containing HA and CaHA for hand rejuvenation appears to be a safe and effective approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The role of oculoplastic surgeons in minimally invasive cosmetic injectables.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In recent years, the field of aesthetic medicine has witnessed a paradigm shift with an increasing demand for minimally invasive cosmetic procedures, including cosmetic injectables. This review aims to delineate the distinctive role played by oculoplastic surgeons in the administration of cosmetic injectables, comparing their expertise to that of nonphysician practitioners. RECENT FINDINGS: Complications arising from cosmetic injections are discussed, including skin discoloration, inflammation, necrosis, vision loss, retinal pathology, and central nervous system adverse effects. Injector expertise, patient factors, type of filler, location of injection, and management strategies are reviewed. Findings highlight diverse practitioner involvement, common adverse effects like skin necrosis and vision loss, with hyaluronic acid fillers being prominent. Areas at the highest risk for ocular complication include the glabella and nose with potential management involving dissolving fillers and reducing pressure. Emphasis is placed on expert injector selection and patient awareness. SUMMARY: The administration of cosmetic injectables requires a profound understanding of facial anatomy, vasculature, and potential complications. In contrast to nonphysician practitioners, oculoplastic and aesthetic surgeons bring a level of anatomical precision and clinical acumen that is essential for navigating the complexities of cosmetic injectables. Emphasis on training and collaboration among practitioners will be essential in advancing the field while prioritizing patient safety and satisfaction.

Fibrotic reaction to hyaluronic acid fillers in the face.

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acids (HAs) can have very different actions not only depending on injector and host factors but also depending on their molecular weight. Whereas short chain HA has immunological activity long chain HA influences fibroblasts and may stimulate them to produce collagen. Although this is generally thought to be a positive feature it may be disadvantageous in certain localizations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have encountered 23 patients who developed fibrous tissue next to the nasolabial folds accentuating them and becoming very obvious while smiling. Hyaluronidase injection did not reduce this mass. RESULTS: Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection led to rapid improvement. DISCUSSION: Fibrotic tissue reaction not responding to hyaluronidase may be the result of HA injection and can effectively be treated with intralesional steroid injection.

Application of High-Frequency Ultrasound to Evaluate Forehead Filling Materials.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, soft tissue materials have been applied as forehead fillers. Some filling materials need to be removed or refilled in a timely manner in certain situations; therefore, it is important to develop a method to identify the location and type of filling materials. This study summarizes the imaging findings of different filling materials under high-frequency ultrasound, providing a reference for clinical treatment. METHODS: We screened facial ultrasound images performed at the Plastic Surgery Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from April 2015 to July 2023 and classified and summarized the types of frontal filling materials and their imaging results. RESULTS: This study included ultrasound imaging results from 114 patients, including 39 with hyaluronic acid (HA) filling, 45 with polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAG) filling, 14 who received autologous fat transplantation, 2 who received prosthesis implantation, 2 who received both HA and PAG filling, and 12 who received silicone oil filling. HA mainly manifests as an anechoic zone on ultrasonography, with images divisible into four types. PAG primarily presents as fine punctate echoes, divisible into five types. Fat transplantation presents as a low-echo area with uneven density, divisible into five types. Finally, the silicone oil-filling material appears as a cloud-like high echo on the forehead, visible throughout the entire skin layer, and unclear imaging in deep tissues. CONCLUSION: High-frequency ultrasound is a safe and reliable method to evaluate the type and position of forehead filling materials, which can be easily applied in clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Injectable Penile Enhancement Procedures: A Review of Agents, Risks, and Complications.

Penile dysmorphophobic disorder describes men who feel their normal penile size is inadequate. Penile fillers have been used to address penile size dissatisfaction. However, unpredictability of these procedures can yield unfavorable outcomes. Reactions to these foreign bodies are inherently uncertain, owing to an array of materials, concentrations, and biocompatibility. Management of complications also varies. As fillers are more commonly used in cosmetic procedures to augment facial features, most genitourinary surgeons are unfamiliar with these therapies. This review seeks to describe the available materials, techniques, and risk profiles of the various types of fillers used for penile augmentation.

Efficacy of a New Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler on Nasolabial Folds Correction: A Prospective, Comparative, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid-based dermal fillers are the cornerstones of wrinkle correction and facial contour redefinition. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of EST LF compared with RES L for the treatment of nasolabial folds (NLFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, split-face, randomized, investigator and subject-blinded trial, 45 subjects with moderate-to-severe symmetrical NLFs were randomized to EST LF on one side of the face and RES L on the other side and were followed up for 9 months. The primary end point was change in WSRS score from the baseline to Month 1 (M1). Secondary end points included changes in WSRS score at other time points, aesthetic improvement, wrinkle volume quantification, adverse events, and local tolerance. RESULTS: The efficacy difference between EST LF and RES L at M1 was in favor of EST LF (-0.16, CI, -0.28 to -0.03]), demonstrating its noninferiority. Considering other time points, significant differences were observed at 3 and 6 months for EST LF , assessed with WSRS, GAIS, or NLF volume quantification. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: EST LF is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of NLFs.

Trends in American Plastic Surgery Procedures (2005-2019): Observing the Growth Rate of Maxillofacial Surgery and Cosmetic Minimally Invasive Procedures in ASPS Data.

BACKGROUND: This study explores the dynamic changes in plastic surgery practices, focusing on the growth rates across different subcategories, particularly highlighting the trends in the United States. OBJECTIVES: To analyze evolving trends in plastic surgery using statistical methods, providing insights into the changes and growth patterns in various segments over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Utilizing data from 2005 to 2019 from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the authors, conducted a comprehensive statistical analysis using the SPSS program to investigate trends in plastic surgery procedures. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed no significant differences in year-on-year growth rates between cosmetic and reconstructive surgery. However, in reconstructive surgery subcategories, maxillofacial surgery showed the highest mean growth rate at 11.61%, though this was not statistically significant. In cosmetic minimally invasive procedures, soft tissue filler injections and botulinum toxin A injections experienced notably higher growth trends compared with microdermabrasion. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that practitioners considering a career in plastic surgery should not focus solely on choosing between reconstructive and cosmetic surgery. Recognizing substantial growth in cosmetic minimally invasive procedures, especially botulinum toxin A injections and fillers, is vital for making informed career decisions.