Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Prev Med ; 123: 95-100, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30763629

RESUMEN

Fentanyl is an important opioid for pain management, but also has exceptional potential for misuse. Seven states have implemented opioid prescribing laws. The objectives of this study were to: 1) characterize the temporal pattern of fentanyl, fentanyl analogue, and other opioid use over the past decade, and 2) determine whether opioid prescribing laws impacted fentanyl use in the US. Drug weights were obtained from the US Automated Reports of Consolidated Orders System (June 2018), a comprehensive publically available resource, from 2006 to 2017 for fentanyl, sufentanil, remifentanil, alfentanil, other prescription opioids, and analyzed by presence of a state opioid prescribing law. Fentanyl, corrected for population, was reduced from 2016 to 2017 (-17.9%) and these decreases significantly exceeded the changes in hydrocodone (-12.3%), oxycodone (-10.1%), morphine (-13.3%), or codeine (-8.8%). Fentanyl showed a particularly large decline in Maine, a state with a strong opioid prescribing law. There was a 3.5 fold difference in fentanyl (µg per capita) in Alaska (488.2) relative to Oregon (1718.4). Hospital use of remifentanil and sufentanil tripled from 2006 to 2017. Although all states experienced a 2016 to 2017 decline in fentanyl, and this reduction was larger than many other prescription opioids, the rate of decline varied over three-fold between states. Strong state laws may account for a portion of the variance in fentanyl and other opioid reductions. The population health risks of fentanyl and fentanyl analogues warrants ongoing vigilance.


Asunto(s)
Alfentanilo/provisión & distribución , Analgésicos Opioides/provisión & distribución , Fentanilo/provisión & distribución , Fentanilo/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Remifentanilo/provisión & distribución , Sufentanilo/provisión & distribución , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alfentanilo/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Remifentanilo/uso terapéutico , Sufentanilo/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
Crit Care ; 22(1): 267, 2018 10 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30367645

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The continuous administration of opioids in critical care patients is a common therapy for the tolerance of mechanical ventilation. Opioid choice has a crucial impact on the length of mechanical ventilation. Owing to its very short context-sensitive half-life, remifentanil widens the available options for sedoanalgetic strategies. Supply disruption of such established intensive care medication has been reported to worsen clinical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study investigated the influence of a nationwide supply shortage of remifentanil on mechanical ventilation and ventilation-associated outcomes at three perioperative intensive care units (ICUs) in a tertiary care hospital in Vienna. Two groups were followed: patients admitted to the ICU during the remifentanil shortage (July 1, 2016 to September 30, 2016) and a control group one year after the remifentanil shortage (July 1, 2017 to September 30, 2017). Included patients were adults, received mechanical ventilation for at least 6 h, were admitted less than 90 days in the respective ICU, and survived their admission. RESULTS: For comparison, Poisson count regression models and logistic regression models were computed. To compensate for multiple testing, the significance level was split (0.02 for the primary and 0.006 for secondary outcome parameters). Patients in the remifentanil shortage group received significantly longer mechanical ventilation (risk ratio 2.19, 95% confidence interval 2.14-2.24, P <0.001) with significantly prolonged ICU stay (P <0.001), days with non-invasive ventilation (P <0.001), and length of hospital stay (P <0.001). No significant difference was found in the occurrence of pneumonia (P = 0.040) and sepsis (P = 0.061). A greater proportion of patients in the shortage group underwent secondary tracheostomy (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The remifentanil shortage caused a significant impairment of essential outcome parameters in the ICU.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Remifentanilo/provisión & distribución , Respiración Artificial/normas , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/provisión & distribución , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Austria , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Distribución de Poisson , Remifentanilo/uso terapéutico , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...