RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The updates to the European recommendations and the German guidelines for the treatment of systemic sclerosis are expected shortly, which are very good evidence-based guidelines for all those treating the disease; however, there are still disease manifestations with insufficient studies and current study results that were published after the review of the literature for the guidelines and might be of interest to the reader. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: The aim of this work is to provide an overview of the publications in the last year that are interesting from the authors' point of view. The aim is to provide practically relevant information on the current state of knowledge that can supplement the guidelines. RESULTS: The pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis (SSc) is becoming better understood in its interplay between environmental factors and the development of autoantibodies. There have also been overviews of the manifestation and prognosis of cardiac involvement in the last year. The American Thoracic Society issued the first guidelines for the treatment of interstitial lung disease in SSc. There are an increasing number of studies that suggest that disease-modulating combination therapies, such as rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are beneficial. Work addressing the involvement of joints suggests that inflammatory changes are common. Current options for the treatment of gastrointestinal involvement are presented. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis and treatment of systemic sclerosis is making progress and many symptoms and complications are treatable. Nevertheless, much remains to be done to improve the quality of life of the patients.
Asunto(s)
Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Esclerodermia Sistémica/terapia , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Humanos , Reumatología/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Alemania , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Recently, a joint group of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) proposed new criteria for Takayasu arteritis (TAK) (the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria). This study applied the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria to patients with previously diagnosed TAK based on the 1990 ACR criteria and investigated the concordance rate between the two criteria according to the four imaging modalities. METHODS: This study reviewed the medical records of 179 patients who met the 1990 ACR criteria for TAK. The imaging modalities included conventional angiography, computed tomography angiography, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, and magnetic resonance angiography. RESULTS: Regardless of the imaging modalities, the concordance rate between the two criteria was 85.5% when including all patients, whereas it increased to 98.1% when only patients aged ≤60 years were included. Among the four imaging modalities, computed tomography angiography exhibited the highest concordance rate between the two criteria (85.6%). The concordance rate among patients aged >60 years was 95.7%. Only one patient aged 50-60 years was reclassified as having both TAK and giant cell arteritis. CONCLUSIONS: The concordance rate was 85.5% regardless of the imaging modalities and increased to 86.9% on simultaneous computed tomography angiography and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging.
Asunto(s)
Arteritis de Takayasu , Humanos , Arteritis de Takayasu/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteritis de Takayasu/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Reumatología/normas , Reumatología/métodos , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Adolescente , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The 2023 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) faced several tasks: the newly approved medications anifrolumab and voclosporin as well as the additional approval of belimumab for lupus nephritis had to be conceptionally fitted into the management of SLE. Novel data on hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids, additional results for the treat-to-target goals remission and low disease activity and experience with respect to vaccinations and infections had to be considered. Additionally, EULAR specified a slightly modified structure. The update was further developed with 5 overarching principles and 13 recommendations. An SLE activity score is required for each patient visit. All SLE patients should receive hydroxychloroquine at a target dose of 5â¯mg/kg body weight. Glucocorticoids should only be used if necessary and reduced to not more than 5â¯mg prednisone equivalent daily in the long-term or, even better, tapered off. If the target of remission or low disease activity is not reached, methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate and/or belimumab or anifrolumab should be used. For lupus nephritis, Euro-Lupus cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate are options for induction therapy and mycophenolate or azathioprine for maintenance. In the case of severe nephritis, the addition of belimumab or a calcineurin inhibitor (voclosporin or tacrolimus) should be considered. It is important that treatment should be continued for at least 3 years. This review article describes the details of the new recommendations against the background of relevant studies in recent years and classifies them in the clinical context.
Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Alemania , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Reumatología/normas , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Nefritis Lúpica/tratamiento farmacológico , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) brings together the majority of Spain's rheumatologists and, among the many services it offers its members, has a Research Unit (RU). This unit provides methodological support to SER members in clinical and epidemiological research, coordinates and carries out research projects, designs and maintains large patient databases, develops qualitative research projects and produces evidence-based medicine (EBM) documents. Through this last activity, the RU of the SER produces clinical practice guidelines and recommendation documents on topics relevant to rheumatology that meet the most demanding methodological standards. The aim of this article is to describe the management process and methodology followed by the UI of the SER to identify the topics of its EBM documents and how it executes and develops its guidelines and recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Reumatología , Sociedades Médicas , Reumatología/normas , España , Humanos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Reumatología , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/terapia , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/complicaciones , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/terapia , Reumatología/normas , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease. METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation. RESULTS: Fifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Reumatología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico , Humanos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Reumáticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/complicaciones , Reumatología/normas , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Enfermedad Mixta del Tejido Conjuntivo/complicaciones , Enfermedad Mixta del Tejido Conjuntivo/diagnóstico , Miositis/diagnóstico , Miositis/complicaciones , Síndrome de Sjögren/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Sjögren/complicaciones , Prueba de PasoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease. METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation. RESULTS: Fifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Reumáticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/complicaciones , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/diagnóstico , Reumatología/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Patient engagement is critical to clinical practice guideline (CPG) development. This work presents our approach to ascertaining patients' values and preferences to inform the American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, monitoring, and treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study of a purposefully sampled Patient Panel using a modified content analytic approach. The study team reviewed text transcripts from the Patient Panel discussion to identify themes and develop a clustered thematic schema. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (75% women) participated, with a mean age of 53 years (range 33-73). Patients had one or more SARDs: systemic sclerosis (38%), Sjögren disease (38%), idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (33%), rheumatoid arthritis (24%), and mixed connective tissue disease (10%). We identified 10 themes in 4 thematic clusters: communication, screening and monitoring, treatment goals, and treatment adverse effects. Patients prioritized recognizing ILD symptoms, importance of ILD screening and close monitoring, goals of survival and improving quality of life, and willingness to accept treatment risks provided that there is close communication with providers. Patient representatives shared patients' priorities and insight at the Voting Panel meeting, influencing multiple guideline recommendations. CONCLUSION: Patient engagement fosters a holistic approach to CPG development, leading to recommendations aiming for the best clinical outcomes while prioritizing outcomes important for patients. The patient-identified themes played a critical role in ILD guideline development and provide core elements for shared decision-making as clinicians make management and therapeutic decisions with patients with SARD-associated ILD.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Prioridad del Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Reumatología , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/terapia , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Anciano , Adulto , Reumatología/normas , Investigación Cualitativa , Participación del Paciente , Enfermedades Reumáticas/terapia , Enfermedades Reumáticas/diagnósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Glucocorticoides , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Reumatología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/complicaciones , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/tratamiento farmacológico , Reumatología/normas , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Estados Unidos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
Sjogren's disease (SjD) is an autoimmune disease that is characterized not only by the sicca symptoms it causes but also by its systemic nature, which is capable of several and not yet fully understood extraglandular manifestations. To gain a clearer understanding of these manifestations as well as a better practical approach, a panel of experts from the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the identification of epidemiologic and clinical features of the extraglandular manifestations present in ESSDAI (EULAR Sjogren´s syndrome disease activity index), followed by a voting panel with recommendations for clinical practice. This publication is complementary to others already published and covers cutaneous and hematological manifestations, with prevalence data generated by a meta-analysis of 13 clinical or laboratory manifestations and 6 clinical management recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Sjögren , Enfermedades de la Piel , Humanos , Brasil/epidemiología , Enfermedades Hematológicas/etiología , Reumatología/normas , Síndrome de Sjögren/complicaciones , Enfermedades de la Piel/etiología , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare chronic autoimmune disease with heterogeneous manifestations. In the last decade, several clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate new treatment options for SSc. The purpose of this work is to update the recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology in light of the new evidence available for the pharmacological management of SSc. METHODS: A systematic review including randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for predefined questions that were elaborated according to the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) strategy was conducted. The rating of the available evidence was performed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. To become a recommendation, at least 75% agreement of the voting panel was needed. RESULTS: Six recommendations were elaborated regarding the pharmacological treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon, the treatment (healing) and prevention of digital ulcers, skin involvement, interstitial lung disease (ILD) and gastrointestinal involvement in SSc patients based on results available from RCTs. New drugs, such as rituximab, were included as therapeutic options for skin involvement, and rituximab, tocilizumab and nintedanib were included as therapeutic options for ILD. Recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of scleroderma renal crisis and musculoskeletal involvement were elaborated based on the expert opinion of the voting panel, as no placebo-controlled RCTs were found. CONCLUSION: These guidelines updated and incorporated new treatment options for the management of SSc based on evidence from the literature and expert opinion regarding SSc, providing support for decision-making in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Raynaud , Reumatología , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Brasil , Reumatología/normas , Enfermedad de Raynaud/tratamiento farmacológico , Sociedades Médicas , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Úlcera Cutánea/etiología , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéuticoAsunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antifosfolípidos , Síndrome Antifosfolípido , Reumatología , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/diagnóstico , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/sangre , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/inmunología , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/clasificación , Humanos , Anticuerpos Antifosfolípidos/sangre , Reumatología/normas , Reumatología/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Estados Unidos , Sociedades Médicas , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: Two methodologists and 20 rheumatologists from Lupus Comittee of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology participate in the development of this guideline. Fourteen PICO questions were defined and a systematic review was performed. Eligible randomized controlled trials were analyzed regarding complete renal remission, partial renal remission, serum creatinine, proteinuria, serum creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, renal relapse, and severe adverse events (infections and mortality). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop these recommendations. Recommendations required ≥82% of agreement among the voting members and were classified as strongly in favor, weakly in favor, conditional, weakly against or strongly against a particular intervention. Other aspects of LN management (diagnosis, general principles of treatment, treatment of comorbidities and refractory cases) were evaluated through literature review and expert opinion. RESULTS: All SLE patients should undergo creatinine and urinalysis tests to assess renal involvement. Kidney biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LN but, if it is not available or there is a contraindication to the procedure, therapeutic decisions should be based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Fourteen recommendations were developed. Target Renal response (TRR) was defined as improvement or maintenance of renal function (±10% at baseline of treatment) combined with a decrease in 24-h proteinuria or 24-h UPCR of 25% at 3 months, a decrease of 50% at 6 months, and proteinuria < 0.8 g/24 h at 12 months. Hydroxychloroquine should be prescribed to all SLE patients, except in cases of contraindication. Glucocorticoids should be used at the lowest dose and for the minimal necessary period. In class III or IV (±V), mycophenolate (MMF), cyclophosphamide, MMF plus tacrolimus (TAC), MMF plus belimumab or TAC can be used as induction therapy. For maintenance therapy, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) are the first choice and TAC or cyclosporin or leflunomide can be used in patients who cannot use MMF or AZA. Rituximab can be prescribed in cases of refractory disease. In cases of failure in achieving TRR, it is important to assess adherence, immunosuppressant dosage, adjuvant therapy, comorbidities, and consider biopsy/rebiopsy. CONCLUSION: This consensus provides evidence-based data to guide LN diagnosis and treatment, supporting the development of public and supplementary health policies in Brazil.
Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores , Nefritis Lúpica , Sociedades Médicas , Nefritis Lúpica/diagnóstico , Nefritis Lúpica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Brasil , Creatinina/sangre , Proteinuria/diagnóstico , Proteinuria/etiología , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Reumatología/normas , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Biopsia , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Leflunamida/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Inducción de Remisión , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Consenso , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Fallo Renal Crónico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients using the 2023 American College of Rheumatology/The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria and compare the revised Sapporo criteria and the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria and evaluate whether the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria provide added value over the revised Sapporo criteria. METHODS: In this descriptive study, 94 aPL-positive patients (with or without APS diagnosis) were identified from two hospital-based registries (Gazi and Hacettepe University). Patients were classified into four groups to compare both criteria sets. These four groups are as follows: (1) patients classified with only the revised Sapporo criteria; (2) patients classified with only the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS criteria; (3) patients classified with both two criteria sets; and (4) patients classified with neither two criteria set. RESULTS: Of the 94 patients, 11 were classified with only the revised Sapporo criteria; one with only the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS criteria; 52 with both criteria sets; and 30 with neither set of criteria. For these 94 patients, the operating characteristics of the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS criteria, using the revised Sapporo criteria as the gold standard, the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS entry criteria demonstrated 100% sensitivity, and the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria demonstrated 98% specificity and 82.5% sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The study emphasizes the importance of recognizing differences in clinical manifestations, such as early pregnancy loss without severe preeclampsia (PEC) and/or severe placental insufficiency (PI) and calls for a nuanced discussion on anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta 2-glycoprotein-I (anti-ß2GPI) immunoglobulin G (IgG) cutoff values.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antifosfolípidos , Síndrome Antifosfolípido , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/diagnóstico , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/inmunología , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/sangre , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Embarazo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Antifosfolípidos/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Turquía , Adulto Joven , Reumatología/normasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for the routine management of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). METHODS: Following standard procedures, a systematic review of the literature by five supervised junior rheumatologists, based on the questions selected by the steering committee (5 senior rheumatologists), was used as the basis for working meetings, followed by a one-day plenary meeting with the working group (15 members), leading to the development of the wording and determination of the strength of the recommendations and the level of agreement of the experts. RESULTS: Five general principles and 19 recommendations were drawn up. Three recommendations relate to diagnosis and the use of imaging, and five to the assessment of the disease, its activity and comorbidities. Non-pharmacological therapies are the subject of one recommendation. Three recommendations concern initial treatment based on general corticosteroid therapy, five concern the reduction of corticosteroid therapy and follow-up, and two concern corticosteroid dependence and steroid-sparing treatments (anti-IL-6). CONCLUSION: These recommendations take account of current data on PMR, with the aim of reducing exposure to corticosteroid therapy and its side effects in a fragile population. They are intended to be practical, to help practitioners in the day-to-day management of patients with PMR.
Asunto(s)
Polimialgia Reumática , Humanos , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Polimialgia Reumática/diagnóstico , Polimialgia Reumática/terapia , Polimialgia Reumática/tratamiento farmacológico , Reumatología/normasRESUMEN
Many patients with rheumatologic conditions receive care from physicians other than rheumatologists. Here we note key findings from 6 studies in rheumatology published in 2023 that offer valuable insights for internal medicine specialists and subspecialists outside of rheumatology. The first study investigated the effect of low-dose glucocorticoids on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over 2 years and challenged existing perceptions about the risks of glucocorticoids in this setting. The second study focused on the updated guideline for preventing and treating glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. With the chronic and widespread use of glucocorticoids, the American College of Rheumatology emphasized the importance of assessing fracture risk and initiating pharmacologic therapy when appropriate. The third study explored the potential use of methotrexate in treating inflammatory hand osteoarthritis, suggesting a novel approach to managing this challenging and common condition. The results of the fourth article we highlight suggest that sarilumab has promise as an adjunct treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica relapse during glucocorticoid dosage tapering. The fifth study evaluated sublingual cyclobenzaprine for fibromyalgia treatment, noting both potential benefits and risks. Finally, the sixth article is a systematic review and meta-analysis that assessed the therapeutic equivalence of biosimilars and reference biologics in the treatment of patients with RA. Knowledge of this recent literature will be useful to clinicians regardless of specialty who care for patients with these commonly encountered conditions.
Asunto(s)
Glucocorticoides , Humanos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Reumatología/normas , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Polimialgia Reumática/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibromialgia/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses international clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) focusing on methodology, guideline quality, and implementation. RECENT FINDINGS: The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ASAS/EULAR) and Pan-American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) recently published axSpA CPGs and updates of the American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network (ACR/SAA/SPARTAN) and Asia-Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR) CPGs are expected. GRADE has emerged as the dominant framework for CPG development and has been used by three of the four international axSpA guidelines. Notable differences exist among these guidelines in the way that the recommendations are presented. Two of the four acknowledge the need for implementation strategies, but little detail about this is provided. The few studies that have evaluated the implementation of axSpA CPGs have identified poor adherence to recommendations on physical therapy/exercise and disease activity monitoring. Implementation science has identified many barriers and facilitators affecting guideline uptake, including those related to healthcare professionals and to the guidelines themselves. Creation of a tailored implementation plan simultaneously with the CPG is recommended. SUMMARY: While methodological rigor in the creation of evidence-based recommendations is the focus of CPG development, recommendations must be presented in a user-friendly format that makes them easy to apply. 'Living guidelines' could facilitate keeping content up to date. Implementation is critical for the success of a CPG and should be emphasized in future axSpA guideline updates. Further research is needed to better understand the factors impacting the successful implementation of axSpA CPGs.
Asunto(s)
Espondiloartritis Axial , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Humanos , Espondiloartritis Axial/terapia , Espondiloartritis Axial/diagnóstico , Reumatología/normas , Reumatología/métodos , Adhesión a DirectrizRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is chronic disease that compromises multiple domains and might be associated with progressive joint damage, increased mortality, functional limitation, and considerably impaired quality of life. Our objective was to generate evidence-based recommendations on the management of PsA in Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) countries. METHODS: We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)-ADOLOPMENT approach to adapt the 2019 recommendations of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology. A working group consisting of rheumatologists from various countries in Latin America identified relevant topics for the treatment of PsA in the region. The methodology team updated the evidence and synthesized the information used to generate the final recommendations. These were then discussed and defined by a panel of 31 rheumatologists from 15 countries. RESULTS: Theses guidelines report 15 recommendations addressing therapeutic targets, use of antiinflammatory agents and corticosteroids, treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (conventional synthetic, biologic, and targeted synthetic), therapeutic failure, optimization of biologic therapy, nonpharmacological interventions, assessment tools, and follow-up of patients with PsA. CONCLUSION: Here we present a set of recommendations to guide decision making in the treatment of PsA in Latin America, based on the best evidence available, considering resources, medical expertise, and the patient's values and preferences. The successful implementation of these recommendations should be based on clinical practice conditions, healthcare settings in each country, and a tailored evaluation of patients.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Psoriásica , Reumatología , Artritis Psoriásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Psoriásica/terapia , Humanos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Reumatología/normas , Sociedades Médicas , América Latina , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Calidad de Vida , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The 2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria were developed with higher specificity but lower sensitivity compared with the 2006 Sydney revised classification criteria. OBJECTIVES: To validate the performance of the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria in a large Chinese APS cohort. METHODS: This was a single-center cohort study. Inclusion criteria aligned with the entry criteria of 2023 criteria. APS classification by "expert consensus panel" served as the gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were compared between the 2023 and 2006 criteria. RESULTS: A total of 526 patients with a mean age of 38.55 ± 12.67 years were enrolled, of whom 366 (69.58%) were female and 182 (34.60%) had systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Among them, 407 (77.38%) patients were classified as APS by experts. The 2023 criteria demonstrated higher overall specificity than the 2006 criteria (0.983 vs 0.950), while sensitivity was relatively lower (0.818 vs 0.853). The sensitivity of the 2023 criteria improved for patients with SLE (0.860 vs 0.825), microvascular manifestations (0.867 vs 0.786), cardiac valve disease (0.903 vs 0.774), and thrombocytopenia (0.811 vs 0.790). Reduced sensitivity of the 2023 criteria was linked to the omission of certain microvascular manifestations, a stricter definition of pregnancy morbidity, and the exclusion of isolated thrombocytopenia and isolated IgM isotype antiphospholipid antibodies from meeting clinical and laboratory criteria, respectively. CONCLUSION: The 2023 criteria offer higher overall specificity and improved sensitivity in specific patient subsets, such as those with SLE, microvascular manifestations, cardiac valve disease, and thrombocytopenia when compared with the 2006 criteria.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Antifosfolípido , Humanos , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/diagnóstico , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/sangre , Síndrome Antifosfolípido/inmunología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , China , Reumatología/normas , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Anticuerpos Antifosfolípidos/sangre , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/sangre , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inmunología , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/clasificación , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is the most frequent extraintestinal manifestation in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). When IBD and spondyloarthritis coexist, musculoskeletal and intestinal disease features should be considered when planning a therapeutic strategy. Treatment options for IBD and SpA have expanded enormously over the last few years, but randomized controlled trials with specific endpoints focused on SpA are not available in the IBD setting. To address this important clinical topic, the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) and the Italian Society of Rheumatology (SIR) jointly planned to draw updated therapeutic recommendations for IBD-associated SpA using a pseudo-Delphi method. This document presents the official recommendations of IG-IBD and SIR on the management of IBD-associated SpA in the form of 34 statements and 4 therapeutic algorithms. It is intended to be a reference guide for gastroenterologists and rheumatologists dealing with IBD-associated SpA.