Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.395
Filtrar
1.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 154: 3616, 2024 Aug 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39154296

RESUMEN

AIM OF THE STUDY: We aimed to evaluate the utilisation of all prescribed drugs during pregnancy dispensed in outpatient care in Switzerland between 2015 and 2021. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study using the Swiss Helsana claims database (2015-2021). We established a cohort of pregnancies by identifying deliveries and estimating the date of the last menstrual period. We analysed the drug burden during a 270-day pre-pregnancy period, during pregnancy (overall and by trimester), and during a 270-day postpartum period. Subsequently, we quantified 1) the median number of drug dispensations (total vs. unique drug claims); and 2) the prevalence of exposure to at least one dispensed drug and the number of dispensed drugs (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and ≥5); and 3) the 15 most frequently dispensed drugs were identified during each period, overall and stratified by maternal age. RESULTS: Among 34,584 pregnant women (5.6% of all successful pregnancies in Switzerland), 87.5% claimed at least one drug (not including vitamins, supplements, and vaccines), and 33.3% claimed at least five drugs during pregnancy. During trimester 1 alone, 8.2% of women claimed at least five distinct drugs. The proportion of women who claimed prescribed drugs was lower pre-pregnancy (69.1%) and similar postpartum (85.6%) when compared to during pregnancy (87.5%). The most frequently claimed drugs during pregnancy were meaningfully different during pregnancy than before and after. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that 8 of 10 women in Switzerland are exposed to prescribed drugs during pregnancy. Most drugs dispensed during pregnancy are comparatively well investigated and are considered safe. However, the high drug burden in this vulnerable patient population underlines the importance of evidence on the benefit-risk profile of individual drugs taken during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Suiza , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Adv Ther ; 41(9): 3615-3632, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39080221

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Insurance claims data and electronic health records (EHRs) have been used to characterize Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) in real-world populations. The ability to assess patient-level DMD disease progression within insurance claims or EHR data infrastructures is unknown. Insurance claims and EHR data were comprehensively examined for availability and reliability of DMD outcomes that describe functional status and disease progression at the individual patient level over time. METHODS: MarketScan Commercial and Medicaid claims, and EHR-linked Clarivate open claims datasets were examined for data measuring 54 previously identified DMD-relevant outcomes in patients with DMD. Each outcome was assigned to one of five categories: functional and clinical events, clinical measures, biomarkers, functional measures, or patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Patients were identified using published coding algorithms. Annual 5-year attrition and data availability for each outcome was determined. The ability to distinguish disease severity and identify test results was also considered where applicable. RESULTS: A total of 1964 (MarketScan Commercial), 2007 (MarketScan Medicaid), and 10,639 (Clarivate) patients were identified. At 5 years, 31.7%, 35.1%, and 59.1% of patients remained in MarketScan Commercial, MarketScan Medicaid, and Clarivate, respectively. Claims were available for five of six functional and clinical events, with 45.5% (MarketScan Commercial), 48.0% (Clarivate), and 48.5% (MarketScan Medicaid) of patients with ≥ 1 claim for the most frequently identified clinical event (cardiomyopathy diagnosis). No data were available to describe frequency of wheelchair use or loss of ambulation. Very limited EHR data (≤ 2% of patients) were available to indicate tests were ordered for clinical measures, biomarkers, or functional assessments. No PRO notes or scores were observed. Data existed for inferring disease severity (e.g., hospitalization for cardiomyopathy); however, it was not apparent whether these events were incident. CONCLUSION: Insurance claims and EHR-linked open claims data are of limited utility for holistically evaluating the progression and burden of DMD in individual patients.


Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a fatal disease that weakens muscles and causes loss of function over time. The timing of symptoms varies across individuals, making it important for doctors to closely monitor them. Although billing data from medical practices have been used to understand how Duchenne muscular dystrophy progresses at the population level, how well these data can document disease progression over time in individuals is unclear. This study examined data submitted by healthcare providers to insurers and electronic health records used to track patients' medical histories to see what information is available about known clinical and functional outcomes for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Some information was available about major events experienced by patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, like heart problems and breathing difficulties. However, these data were limited to more advanced stages of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and did not reveal when these events first occurred or how severe they were. Information about whether ordered tests were performed was limited, with even less information available for test results. There were no data reported by patients themselves available in the datasets. The limitations of data submitted to insurers and from electronic health records in describing the clinical and functional outcomes of Duchenne muscular dystrophy make it difficult to understand individuals' medical history. Other data sources, particularly from tests measuring patient function done in the doctor's office or patient-reported outcomes, may exist but are not transferred to insurer data infrastructures.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne , Humanos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Adolescente , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Estudios Longitudinales , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Femenino
3.
J Comp Eff Res ; 13(8): e230183, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39012387

RESUMEN

Aim: Explore the safety of Belbuca® (buprenorphine buccal film), buprenorphine transdermal patches and oral opioids for chronic low back pain (cLBP) treatment. Methods: The retrospective analysis of the MarketScan Commercial database (2018-2021) included treatment-naive cLBP adults. The first date of buprenorphine (Belbuca and transdermal patch) or opioid prescription was index date. Cohorts were defined based on the index medication. Observation included a 6-month pre-index period, while post-index lasted until the end of continuous insurance coverage. There were 44 relevant treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) identified in the literature. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) and incidence rate difference (IRD) were used to compare serious TEAE rates (in 1000 person-years) between cohorts. Propensity-score matching minimized the selection bias. Results: Buprenorphine had lower rates of 15 serious TEAEs than oral opioids (all p ≤ 0.037), while higher rates only for serious dizziness (IRR 2.44, p = 0.011; driven by Belbuca), opioid abuse/dependence (IRR 3.13, p = 0.004; driven by patches) and cholecystitis (IRD 20.25, p = 0.044; an outlier). Additionally, a comparison between Belbuca and oral opioids showed lower rates of 13 serious TEAEs (all p ≤ 0.024) and a higher serious dizziness rate (IRR 3.17, p = 0.024). Although the rates of serious opioid abuse/dependence were similar (24.60 vs 26.93, p = 0.921), all Belbuca patients and none of the opioid patients had a positive history of these events. Belbuca also had lower rates of five serious TEAEs than transdermal patches (all p ≤ 0.018), including a serious opioid abuse/dependence (IRR 0.04, p < 0.001), but higher rates of serious cholecystitis (IRD 52.17, p = 0.035; an outlier) and suicidal ideation (IRD 156.50, p < 0.001; an outlier). Conclusion: Buprenorphine had a better safety profile than oral opioids in cLBP treatment. Belbuca showed a more favorable TEAE profile than buprenorphine transdermal patches and oral opioids.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Buprenorfina , Dolor Crónico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Humanos , Buprenorfina/efectos adversos , Buprenorfina/administración & dosificación , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Parche Transdérmico , Adulto Joven , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico
4.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1365712, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39022417

RESUMEN

Introduction: Patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) have significant health challenges that are well-documented, however their impact in terms of cost is not known. Our research objective was to examine the cost burden of EDS and HSD in the United States. We focused this analysis on those with commercial insurance plans. Methods: We queried the MarketScan® database for year 2021 for claims that contained an ICD-10 diagnosis code for EDS or hypermobility. Excess costs for patients in the EDS and HSD cohorts were determined by matching each patient to one patient in the database that did not have a claim for EDS or HSD and comparing total costs for the calendar year. We determined whether patients had claims for selected comorbid conditions likely to impact costs during the calendar year. Results: Sample sizes were 5,113 for adult (age ≥ 18) patients with EDS, 4,880 for adult patients with HSD, 1,059 for child (age 5-17) patients with EDS, and 2,427 for child patients with HSD. The mean excess costs were $21,100 for adult EDS patients, $11,600 for adult HSD patients, $17,000 for child EDS patients, and $11,000 for child HSD patients. EDS and HSD cohorts, both adults and children, with any of the comorbidities had greater healthcare costs. The largest difference was found in the EDS cohort with gastrointestinal comorbid conditions, with more than double the costs for adults. Discussion: We found that patients in the MarketScan database, adults and children, who had EDS or HSD had substantially higher associated excess healthcare costs than patients without EDS or HSD when considering age, sex, geographic location, and comorbidities. These disproportionate healthcare costs in this population have health policy and economic implications, including the need for rapid diagnosis, access to treatment, and accelerated research to advance treatments.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Síndrome de Ehlers-Danlos , Humanos , Síndrome de Ehlers-Danlos/economía , Síndrome de Ehlers-Danlos/epidemiología , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Femenino , Masculino , Niño , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Preescolar , Adulto Joven , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Comorbilidad , Anciano
5.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 24(1): 122, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831393

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Two propensity score (PS) based balancing covariate methods, the overlap weighting method (OW) and the fine stratification method (FS), produce superb covariate balance. OW has been compared with various weighting methods while FS has been compared with the traditional stratification method and various matching methods. However, no study has yet compared OW and FS. In addition, OW has not yet been evaluated in large claims data with low prevalence exposure and with low frequency outcomes, a context in which optimal use of balancing methods is critical. In the study, we aimed to compare OW and FS using real-world data and simulations with low prevalence exposure and with low frequency outcomes. METHODS: We used the Texas State Medicaid claims data on adult beneficiaries with diabetes in 2012 as an empirical example (N = 42,628). Based on its real-world research question, we estimated an average treatment effect of health center vs. non-health center attendance in the total population. We also performed simulations to evaluate their relative performance. To preserve associations between covariates, we used the plasmode approach to simulate outcomes and/or exposures with N = 4,000. We simulated both homogeneous and heterogeneous treatment effects with various outcome risks (1-30% or observed: 27.75%) and/or exposure prevalence (2.5-30% or observed:10.55%). We used a weighted generalized linear model to estimate the exposure effect and the cluster-robust standard error (SE) method to estimate its SE. RESULTS: In the empirical example, we found that OW had smaller standardized mean differences in all covariates (range: OW: 0.0-0.02 vs. FS: 0.22-3.26) and Mahalanobis balance distance (MB) (< 0.001 vs. > 0.049) than FS. In simulations, OW also achieved smaller MB (homogeneity: <0.04 vs. > 0.04; heterogeneity: 0.0-0.11 vs. 0.07-0.29), relative bias (homogeneity: 4.04-56.20 vs. 20-61.63; heterogeneity: 7.85-57.6 vs. 15.0-60.4), square root of mean squared error (homogeneity: 0.332-1.308 vs. 0.385-1.365; heterogeneity: 0.263-0.526 vs 0.313-0.620), and coverage probability (homogeneity: 0.0-80.4% vs. 0.0-69.8%; heterogeneity: 0.0-97.6% vs. 0.0-92.8%), than FS, in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that OW can yield nearly perfect covariate balance and therefore enhance the accuracy of average treatment effect estimation in the total population.


Asunto(s)
Puntaje de Propensión , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Texas/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Simulación por Computador , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1374766, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38873308

RESUMEN

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has profoundly affected the utilization of rehabilitation services. Existing evidence investigating this issue at the nationwide level is lacking, and it is uncertain whether the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of rehabilitation therapy of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. This study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the rehabilitation therapy of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Methods: We obtained data from South Korea's Health Insurance Review and Assessment Agency for 2017-2021. By analyzing the claims data, we focused on rehabilitation therapy in individuals with CP under 18 years of age. We categorized these according to therapy type (physical, occupational, or dysphagia), medical facility, hospital visits, and insurance. We calculated the patient counts and average claims per person and compared the average from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Over the 5 years, there was a significant decline in the number of patients undergoing rehabilitation therapy (trend p = 0.004), but the average claims per person remained stable (trend p = 0.971). During the COVID-19 pandemic, the average number of claims per person decreased significantly compared to the control period (p = 0.013). Both the physical (p = 0.049) and occupational therapy groups (p = 0.019) showed significant differences in claims. General hospitals and hospitals experienced a decrease in average cases by 2.2 (p < 0.001) and 2.4 (p < 0.001) respectively, while long-term care hospitals increased by 3.1 cases (p < 0.001). Outpatients showed a decline of 2.0 cases (p < 0.001), whereas inpatients showed an increase of 5.9 cases (p < 0.001). Individuals with health insurance decreased by 0.5 cases (p = 0.007), but the decrease of 0.08 cases among medical aid-covered individuals was not statistically significant (p = 0.898). Conclusion: In 2020-2021, the average number of claims per person showed a significant decrease compared to the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period (2017-2019). Depending on the type of treatment, the number of claims for physical and occupational therapy significantly decreased.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Parálisis Cerebral , Humanos , COVID-19/rehabilitación , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , República de Corea/epidemiología , Adolescente , Parálisis Cerebral/rehabilitación , Parálisis Cerebral/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 60(4): 469-478, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38863242

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) are vulnerable to psychological distress given a new cancer diagnosis superimposed on pre-existing chronic liver disease. We aimed to characterise the psychiatric burden in HCC, risk factors for incident diagnosis and treatment patterns over time. METHODS: Using IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus for Academics-a nationally representative claims database of the commercially insured US population-we identified psychiatric diagnoses and treatment among patients with newly diagnosed HCC. Multivariable logistic regression modelling identified factors associated with psychiatric diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: Of 11,609 patients with HCC, 2166 (18.6%) had a psychiatric diagnosis after cancer diagnosis with depression (58.3%) and anxiety (53.0%) being most common. Women (aOR 1.33, 95% CI [1.19-1.49]), pre-existing psychiatric diagnoses (aOR 9.12 [8.08-10.3]) and HCC treatment type (transplant: aOR 2.15 [1.66-2.77]; locoregional therapies: aOR 1.74 [1.52-1.99]; hospice: aOR 2.43 [1.79-3.29]) were significantly associated with psychiatric diagnosis. Female sex, ascites, higher comorbidity and treatment type were associated with incident psychiatric diagnosis. Pharmacotherapy was used in 1392 (64.3%) patients with a psychiatric diagnosis, with antidepressants (46.2%) and anxiolytics (32.8%) being most common. Psychiatric diagnoses increased from 14.8% in 2006-2009 to 21.1% in 2018-2021 (p < 0.001). In almost 20% of patients with pre-existing psychiatric conditions, therapy was discontinued after HCC diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 2 of 10 patients with HCC were diagnosed with a psychiatric condition after cancer diagnosis with unique sociodemographic and clinical risk factors identified. This highlights a risk for increased psychological burden in need of early evaluation and treatment among patients with newly diagnosed HCC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicaciones , Incidencia , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones
8.
Health Serv Res ; 59(4): e14342, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38880660

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database (APCD) for disparity research in persistent poverty areas by determining (1) its representativeness of Arkansas population, (2) variation by county, and (3) differences in coverage between persistent poverty and other counties. DATA SOURCES: Cross-sectional study using 2019 Arkansas APCD member enrollment data and county-level data from various agencies. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: An alias identifier linked persons across insurance plans. County FIPS codes were used to extract county-level variables. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort 1 included individuals with ≥1 day of medical coverage in 2019. Cohort 2 included individuals with medical coverage in June, 2019. Cohort 3 included individuals with continuous medical coverage in 2019. Sampling proportions of a county's population in the three cohorts were compared between persistent poverty and other counties. Inverse-variance weighted linear regression was used to identify county-level socioeconomic and demographic characteristics associated with inclusion in each cohort. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In 2019, 73.6% of Arkansans had medical coverage for ≥1 day (Cohort 1), 66.3% had coverage in June (Cohort 2), and 58.8% had continuous coverage (Cohort 3) in APCD. Sampling proportions varied by county (median[range]: Cohort 1, 78% [58%-95%]; Cohort 2, 71% [51%-88%]; and Cohort 3, 64% [44%-80%]), and were higher among persistent poverty counties than others for all three cohorts (mean [SD], persistent poverty vs. other: Cohort 1: 80.9% [6.4%] vs. 77.1% [6.3%], p = 0.04; Cohort 2: 74.0% [6.4%] vs. 70.1% [6.2%], p = 0.03; Cohort 3: 66.4% [6.1%] vs. 62.7% [6.0%], p = 0.03). In the 2019 APCD, larger counties and those with higher proportions of females or persons 65+ years had higher coverage, whereas counties with higher per capita household income, median home value, or disproportionately more persons of other races (non-White and non-Black) had lower coverage (p < 0.05 for all three cohorts). CONCLUSIONS: The Arkansas APCD had good coverage of Arkansas population. Coverage was higher in persistent poverty counties than others.


Asunto(s)
Pobreza , Humanos , Arkansas , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Adolescente , Bases de Datos Factuales , Adulto Joven , Preescolar , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Niño , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Lactante , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Áreas de Pobreza
9.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 72(8): 2381-2390, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38814274

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gold standard dementia assessments are rarely available in large real-world datasets, leaving researchers to choose among methods with imperfect but acceptable accuracy to identify nursing home (NH) residents with dementia. In healthcare claims, options include claims-based diagnosis algorithms, diagnosis indicators, and cognitive function measures in the Minimum Data Set (MDS), but few studies have compared these. We evaluated the proportion of NH residents identified with possible dementia and concordance of these three. METHODS: Using a 20% random sample of 2018-2019 Medicare beneficiaries, we identified MDS admission assessments for non-skilled NH stays among individuals with continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts A, B, and D. Dementia was identified using: (1) Chronic Conditions Warehouse (CCW) claims-based algorithm for Alzheimer's disease and non-Alzheimer's dementia; (2) MDS active diagnosis indicators for Alzheimer's disease and non-Alzheimer's dementias; and (3) the MDS Cognitive Function Scale (CFS) (at least mild cognitive impairment). We compared the proportion of admissions with evidence of possible dementia using each criterion and calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and agreement of the CCW claims definition and MDS indicators for identifying any impairment on the CFS. RESULTS: Among 346,013 non-SNF NH admissions between 2018 and 2019, 57.2% met criteria for at least one definition (44.7% CFS, 40.7% CCW algorithm, 26.0% MDS indicators). The MDS CFS uniquely identified the greatest proportion with evidence of dementia. The CCW claims algorithm had 63.7% sensitivity and 78.1% specificity for identifying any cognitive impairment on the CFS. Active diagnosis indicators from the MDS had lower sensitivity (47.0%), but higher specificity (91.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Claims- and MDS-based methods for identifying NH residents with possible dementia have only partial overlap in the cohorts they identify, and neither is an obvious gold standard. Future studies should seek to determine whether additional functional assessments from the MDS or prescriptions can improve identification of possible dementia in this population.


Asunto(s)
Demencia , Medicare , Casas de Salud , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Demencia/diagnóstico , Femenino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Algoritmos , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Cognición , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Hogares para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
Health Serv Res ; 59(4): e14330, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773839

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop a claims-based algorithm to determine the setting of a disease diagnosis. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: Medicare enrollment and claims data from 2014 to 2019. STUDY DESIGN: We developed a claims-based algorithm using facility indicators, revenue center codes, and place of service codes to identify settings where HCV diagnosis first appeared. When the first appearance was in a laboratory, we attempted to associate HCV diagnoses with subsequent clinical visits. Face validity was assessed by examining association of claims-based diagnostic settings with treatment initiation. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Patients newly diagnosed with HCV and continuously enrolled in traditional Medicare Parts A, B, and D (12 months before and 6 months after index diagnosis) were included. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among 104,454 patients aged 18-64 and 66,726 aged ≥65, 70.1% and 69%, respectively, were diagnosed in outpatient settings, and 20.2% and 22.7%, respectively in laboratory or unknown settings. Logistic regression revealed significantly lower odds of treatment initiation after diagnosis in emergency departments/urgent cares, hospitals, laboratories, or unclassified settings, than in outpatient visits. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm identified the setting of HCV diagnosis in most cases, and found significant associations with treatment initiation, suggesting an approach that can be adapted for future claims-based studies.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Hepatitis C , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Medicare , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/terapia , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Adolescente , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
11.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 20(7): 1141-1151, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38450539

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the incidence of pediatric narcolepsy diagnosis, subsequent care, and potential sociodemographic disparities in a large US claims database. METHODS: Merative MarketScan insurance claims (n = 12,394,902) were used to identify youth (6-17 years of age) newly diagnosed with narcolepsy (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes). Narcolepsy diagnosis and care 1 year postdiagnosis included polysomnography with Multiple Sleep Latency Test, pharmacological care, and clinical visits. Potential disparities were examined by insurance coverage and child race and ethnicity (Medicaid-insured only). RESULTS: The incidence of narcolepsy diagnosis was 10:100,000, primarily type 2 (69.9%). Most diagnoses occurred in adolescents with no sex differences, but higher rates in Black vs White youth with Medicaid. Two thirds had a prior sleep disorder diagnosis and 21-36% had other co-occurring diagnoses. Only half (46.6%) had polysomnography with Multiple Sleep Latency Test (± 1 year postdiagnosis). Specialty care (18.9% pulmonary, 26.9% neurology) and behavioral health visits were rare (34.4%), although half were prescribed stimulant medications (51.0%). Medicaid-insured were 86% less likely than commercially insured youth to have any clinical care and 33% less likely to have polysomnography with Multiple Sleep Latency Test. CONCLUSIONS: Narcolepsy diagnoses occurred in 0.01% of youth, primarily during adolescence, and at higher rates for Black vs White children with Medicaid. Only half overall had evidence of a diagnostically required polysomnography with Multiple Sleep Latency Test, underscoring potential misdiagnosis. Many patients had co-occurring conditions, but specialty and behavioral health care were limited. Results suggest misdiagnosis, underdiagnosis, and limited narcolepsy treatment, as well as possible disparities. Results highlight the need to identify determinants of evidence-based pediatric narcolepsy diagnosis and management. CITATION: Tang SH, Min J, Zhang X, et al. Incidence of pediatric narcolepsy diagnosis and management: evidence from claims data. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(7):1141-1151.


Asunto(s)
Narcolepsia , Polisomnografía , Humanos , Narcolepsia/diagnóstico , Narcolepsia/epidemiología , Narcolepsia/terapia , Niño , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Incidencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Polisomnografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
J Atten Disord ; 28(8): 1225-1235, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38500256

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize provider types delivering outpatient care overall and through telehealth to U.S. adults with ADHD. METHOD: Using employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) and Medicaid claims, we identified enrollees aged 18 to 64 years who received outpatient care for ADHD in 2021. Billing provider codes were used to tabulate the percentage of enrollees receiving ADHD care from 10 provider types overall and through telehealth. RESULTS: Family practice physicians, psychiatrists, and nurse practitioners/psychiatric nurses were the most common providers for adults with ESI, although the distribution of provider types varied across states. Lower percentages of adults with Medicaid received ADHD care from physicians. Approximately half of adults receiving outpatient ADHD care received ADHD care by telehealth. CONCLUSION: Results may inform the development of clinical guidelines for adult ADHD and identify audiences for guideline dissemination and education planning.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Medicaid , Telemedicina , Humanos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Masculino , Adolescente , Femenino , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Planes de Asistencia Médica para Empleados/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 121(5): 148-154, 2024 Mar 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38381660

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney failure (CKF) is often treated with dialysis, which is invasive and costly and carries major medical risks. The existing studies of patients with CKF requiring dialysis that are based on claims data from German statutory health insurance (SHI) carriers employ varying definitions of this entity, with unclear consequences for the resulting statistical estimates. METHODS: We carried out a cohort study on four random samples, each consisting of 62 200 persons aged 70 or above, from among the insurees of the SHI AOK Nordost, with one sample for each of the years 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018. The prevalence, incidence, mortality, and direct health care costs of CKF requiring dialysis were estimated and compared on the basis of four different definitions from literature and a new definition developed by the authors in reference to billing data. RESULTS: The different definitions led to variation in 12-month prevalences (range: 0.33-0.61%) and 6-month incidences (0.058-0.100%). The percentage of patients with prior acute kidney injury (AKI) ranged from 27.6% to 61.8%. Among incident patients, three-month survival ranged from 70.2% to 88.1%, and six-month survival from 60.5% to 81.3%. In CKF patients without prior AKI, the survival curves differed less across definitions (80.2-91.8% at three months, 70.7-84.4% at six months). The monthly health care costs ranged from €6010 to €9606, with marked variability across definitions in the costs of inpatient and outpatient care. CONCLUSION: The lack of a standardized definition of CKF requiring dialysis in German SHI claims data leads to variability in the estimated case numbers, mortality, and health care costs. These differences are most probably in part due to the variable inclusion of inpatients who received short-term dialysis after AKI.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Diálisis Renal , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios de Cohortes , Alemania , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Prevalencia , Diálisis Renal/economía , Diálisis Renal/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
N Engl J Med ; 390(4): 338-345, 2024 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265645

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospitals can leverage their position between the ultimate buyers and sellers of drugs to retain a substantial share of insurer pharmaceutical expenditures. METHODS: In this study, we used 2020-2021 national Blue Cross Blue Shield claims data regarding patients in the United States who had drug-infusion visits for oncologic conditions, inflammatory conditions, or blood-cell deficiency disorders. Markups of the reimbursement prices were measured in terms of amounts paid by Blue Cross Blue Shield plans to hospitals and physician practices relative to the amounts paid by these providers to drug manufacturers. Acquisition-price reductions in hospital payments to drug manufacturers were measured in terms of discounts under the federal 340B Drug Pricing Program. We estimated the percentage of Blue Cross Blue Shield drug spending that was received by drug manufacturers and the percentage retained by provider organizations. RESULTS: The study included 404,443 patients in the United States who had 4,727,189 drug-infusion visits. The median price markup (defined as the ratio of the reimbursement price to the acquisition price) for hospitals eligible for 340B discounts was 3.08 (interquartile range, 1.87 to 6.38). After adjustment for drug, patient, and geographic factors, price markups at hospitals eligible for 340B discounts were 6.59 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.02 to 7.16) as high as those in independent physician practices, and price markups at noneligible hospitals were 4.34 times (95% CI, 3.77 to 4.90) as high as those in physician practices. Hospitals eligible for 340B discounts retained 64.3% of insurer drug expenditures, whereas hospitals not eligible for 340B discounts retained 44.8% and independent physician practices retained 19.1%. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that hospitals imposed large price markups and retained a substantial share of total insurer spending on physician-administered drugs for patients with private insurance. The effects were especially large for hospitals eligible for discounts under the federal 340B Drug Pricing Program on acquisition costs paid to manufacturers. (Funded by Arnold Ventures and the National Institute for Health Care Management.).


Asunto(s)
Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul , Honorarios Farmacéuticos , Precios de Hospital , Seguro de Salud , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Humanos , Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/economía , Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud , Hospitales , Aseguradoras , Médicos/economía , Seguro de Salud/economía , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/economía , Sector Privado , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/economía , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Infusiones Parenterales/economía , Infusiones Parenterales/estadística & datos numéricos , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica Profesional/economía , Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
J Infect Chemother ; 30(8): 815-819, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272261

RESUMEN

This study aimed to clarify other diseases claimed simultaneously with acute upper respiratory infection (URI), antibiotic prescriptions, and examinations associated with infectious diseases in pediatric patients with acute URI insurance claims at otorhinolaryngology outpatient visits. Pediatric patients who visited an otolaryngology department between 2019 and 2021 and were definitively diagnosed with URI were selected using a large Japanese medical claims database. Patient backgrounds, antibiotic use, and examinations were descriptively evaluated. In total, 8010 patients were included in the analysis. The median number (interquartile range) of diseases claimed in the same month as acute URI was 4 (3-6). Only 519 (6.5 %) patients were claimed as acute URI alone. Regardless of the prescription of antibiotics, the most commonly redundantly claimed disease in these patients was allergic rhinitis, followed by acute bronchitis, acute sinusitis, and earwax impaction. The frequently prescribed antibiotics were third-generation cephalosporins, macrolides, and penicillins with extended-spectrum, including amoxicillin which was recommended by the Japanese manual; the proportion of patients with examinations was low (2.9-21.7 %). Among patients with acute URI, diagnoses requiring antibiotics were also claimed; therefore, when evaluating acute URI using the Japanese medical claims database, care must be taken in patient selection. Moreover, the implementation rate of examinations necessary for diagnosis was low, so there is an urgent need to develop an environment where examinations can be conducted in outpatient settings.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Preescolar , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Lactante , Enfermedad Aguda , Otolaringología/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Bronquitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Bronquitis/diagnóstico , Pueblos del Este de Asia
16.
Drug Saf ; 47(1): 59-70, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37995048

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prior molecular modelling analysis identified several medicines as potential inhibitors of glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPx1) which may contribute to development or progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study investigates 40 medicines (index medicines) for signals of COPD development or progression in a real-world dataset. METHODS: Sequence symmetry analysis (SSA) was conducted using a 10% extract of Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) claims data between January 2013 and September 2019. Patients must have been initiated on an index medicine and a medicine for COPD development or progression within 12 months of each other. Sequence ratios were calculated as the number of patients who initiated an index medicine followed by a medicine for COPD development or progression divided by the number who initiated the index medicine second. An adjusted sequence ratio (aSR) was calculated which accounted for changes in prescribing trends. Adverse drug event signals (ADEs) were identified where the aSR lower 95% confidence interval (CI) was greater than 1. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 40 (53%) index medicines had at least one ADE signal of COPD development or progression. Signals of COPD development, as identified using initiation of tiotropium, were observed for atenolol (aSR 1.32, 95% CI 1.23-1.42) and naproxen (aSR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.23). Several signals of COPD progression were observed, including initiation of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol following initiation of atenolol (aSR 1.44, 95% CI 1.30-1.60) and initiation of aclidinium/formoterol following initiation of naproxen (aSR 2.21, 95% CI 1.34-3.65). CONCLUSION: ADE signals were generated for several potential GPx1 inhibitors; however, further validation of signals is required in large well-controlled observational studies.


Asunto(s)
Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Inhibidores Enzimáticos , Glutatión Peroxidasa GPX1 , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Glutatión Peroxidasa GPX1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Australia , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/efectos adversos , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Progresión de la Enfermedad
17.
JAMA ; 329(21): 1840-1847, 2023 06 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37278813

RESUMEN

Importance: US hospitals report data on many health care quality metrics to government and independent health care rating organizations, but the annual cost to acute care hospitals of measuring and reporting quality metric data, independent of resources spent on quality interventions, is not well known. Objective: To evaluate externally reported inpatient quality metrics for adult patients and estimate the cost of data collection and reporting, independent of quality-improvement efforts. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective time-driven activity-based costing study at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, Maryland) with hospital personnel involved in quality metric reporting processes interviewed between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2019, about quality reporting activities in the 2018 calendar year. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included the number of metrics, annual person-hours per metric type, and annual personnel cost per metric type. Results: A total of 162 unique metrics were identified, of which 96 (59.3%) were claims-based, 107 (66.0%) were outcome metrics, and 101 (62.3%) were related to patient safety. Preparing and reporting data for these metrics required an estimated 108 478 person-hours, with an estimated personnel cost of $5 038 218.28 (2022 USD) plus an additional $602 730.66 in vendor fees. Claims-based (96 metrics; $37 553.58 per metric per year) and chart-abstracted (26 metrics; $33 871.30 per metric per year) metrics used the most resources per metric, while electronic metrics consumed far less (4 metrics; $1901.58 per metric per year). Conclusions and Relevance: Significant resources are expended exclusively for quality reporting, and some methods of quality assessment are far more expensive than others. Claims-based metrics were unexpectedly found to be the most resource intensive of all metric types. Policy makers should consider reducing the number of metrics and shifting to electronic metrics, when possible, to optimize resources spent in the overall pursuit of higher quality.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales , Reportes Públicos de Datos en Atención de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/normas , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/normas , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/provisión & distribución , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/economía , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/normas , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguridad del Paciente/economía , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos
18.
BMC Psychiatry ; 23(1): 278, 2023 04 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37081408

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is limited consensus regarding the optimal treatment of insomnia. The recent introduction of orexin receptor antagonists (ORA) has increased the available treatment options. However, the prescribing patterns of hypnotics in Japan have not been comprehensively assessed. We performed analyses of a claims database to investigate the real-world use of hypnotics for treating insomnia in Japan. METHODS: Data were retrieved for outpatients (aged ≥ 20 to < 75 years old) prescribed ≥ 1 hypnotic for a diagnosis of insomnia between April 1st, 2009 and March 31st, 2020, with ≥ 12 months of continuous enrolment in the JMDC Claims Database. Patients were classified as new or long-term users of hypnotics. Long-term use was defined as prescription of the same mechanism of action (MOA) for ≥ 180 days. We analyzed the trends (2010-2019) and patterns (2018-2019) in hypnotics prescriptions. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 130,177 new and 91,215 long-term users (2010-2019). Most new users were prescribed one MOA per year (97.1%-97.9%). In 2010, GABAA-receptor agonists (benzodiazepines [BZD] or z-drugs) were prescribed to 94.0% of new users. Prescriptions for BZD declined from 54.8% of patients in 2010 to 30.5% in 2019, whereas z-drug prescriptions remained stable (~ 40%). Prescriptions for melatonin receptor agonist increased slightly (3.2% to 6.3%). Prescriptions for ORA increased over this time from 0% to 20.2%. Prescriptions for BZD alone among long-term users decreased steadily from 68.3% in 2010 to 49.7% in 2019. Prescriptions for ORA were lower among long-term users (0% in 2010, 4.3% in 2019) relative to new users. Using data from 2018-2019, multiple (≥ 2) MOAs were prescribed to a higher proportion of long-term (18.2%) than new (2.8%) users. The distribution of MOAs according to psychiatric comorbidities, segmented by age or sex, revealed higher proportions of BZD prescriptions in elderly (new and long-term users) and male (new users) patients in all comorbidity segments. CONCLUSION: Prescriptions for hypnotics among new and long-term users in Japan showed distinct patterns and trends. Further understanding of the treatment options for insomnia with accumulating evidence for the risk-benefit balance might be beneficial for physicians prescribing hypnotics in real-world settings.


Asunto(s)
Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Fármacos Inductores del Sueño , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pueblos del Este de Asia , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Japón/epidemiología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiología , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Receptores de Melatonina/agonistas , Agonistas de Receptores de GABA-A/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de los Receptores de Orexina/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Inductores del Sueño/uso terapéutico
19.
Respir Res ; 23(1): 24, 2022 Feb 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35135550

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a cryptogenic chronic interstitial pneumonia with progressive fibrosis and a poor prognosis. A substantial number of epidemiological studies have been conducted in Europe and the United States (US). In contrast, in Japan, only one study reported the prevalence of IPF (10.0 per 100,000 population) using clinical data (2003-2007) from one prefecture; thus, the nationwide prevalence of IPF remains unknown. This study aimed to estimate the nationwide prevalence of IPF in Japan using a nationwide claims database. METHODS: We extracted data from a Japanese claims database provided by Medical Data Vision (MDV database, April 2008-March 2019) containing data from approximately 28 million patients from 385 acute-care hospitals. Patients with IPF (those diagnosed with IPF at least once) from April 2017 to March 2018 were identified in the MDV database. The number of patients in the MDV database was extrapolated nationwide using the fourth NDB Open Data (April 2017-March 2018), and the prevalence was estimated using demographic data as denominators. The prevalence in the US, considering the same definition of IPF, was also calculated and compared with that in Japan. RESULT: The number of patients with IPF in the MDV database was 4278. The estimated nationwide number of patients in Japan was estimated to be 34,040 (mean age: 73 years, percentage of men: 73%), and the prevalence was 27 per 100,000 population. In comparison with that in the US, the prevalence was similar in men and relatively lower in women until the age of 75-79 years, and it was notably lower in both sexes aged ≥ 80 years. CONCLUSIONS: We report the nationwide IPF prevalence in Japan using data from claims databases for the first time. The prevalence estimated in this study was higher than that reported in a previous study. The difference might be due to differences in study settings and definitions of IPF. Further research should be performed to determine the prevalence more accurately and compare it with those in other countries.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/epidemiología , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Distribución por Sexo
20.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 85(3): 1301-1308, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34924375

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Periodontal disease and hepatitis C virus (HCV) represent chronic infectious states that are common in elderly adults. Both conditions have independently been associated with an increased risk for dementia. Chronic infections are thought to lead to neurodegenerative changes in the central nervous system possibly by promoting a proinflammatory state. This is consistent with growing literature on the etiological role of infections in dementia. Few studies have previously evaluated the association of periodontal disease with dementia in HCV patients. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether periodontal disease increases the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) among HCV patients in Medicare claims data. METHODS: We used Medicare claims data for HCV patients to assess the incidence rate of ADRD with and without exposure to periodontal disease between 2014 and 2017. Cox multivariate regression was used to estimate the association between periodontal disease and development of ADRD, controlling for age, gender, race, ZIP-level income and education, and medical comorbidities. RESULTS: Of 439,760 HCV patients, the incidence rate of ADRD was higher in patients with periodontal diseases compared to those without (10.84% versus 9.26%, p < 0.001), and those with periodontal disease developed ADRD earlier compared to those without periodontal disease (13.99 versus 21.60 months, p < 0.001). The hazard of developing ADRD was 1.35 times higher in those with periodontal disease (95% CI, 1.30 to 1.40, p < 0.001) after adjusting for all covariates, including age. CONCLUSION: Periodontal disease increased the risk of developing ADRD among HCV patients in a national Medicare claims dataset.


Asunto(s)
Demencia/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Enfermedades Periodontales/epidemiología , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Incidencia , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Medicare , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...