RESUMEN
Background Evidence-based therapies are generally underused for cardiovascular risk reduction; however, less is known about contemporary patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Methods and Results Pharmacy and medical claims data from within Anthem were queried for patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Using an index date of April 18, 2018, we evaluated the proportion of patients with a prescription claim for any of the 3 evidence-based therapies on, or covering, the index date ±30 days: high-intensity statin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist. The potential benefit of achieving 100% adoption of all 3 evidence-based therapies was simulated using pooled treatment estimates from clinical trials. Of the 155 958 patients in the sample, 24.7% were using a high-intensity statin, 53.1% were using an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, and 9.9% were using either an sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Overall, only 2.7% of the population were covered by prescriptions for all 3 evidence-based therapies, and 37.4% were on none of them. Over a 12-month period, 70.6% of patients saw a cardiologist, while only 18% saw an endocrinologist. Increasing the use of evidence-based therapies to 100% over 3 years of treatment could be expected to reduce 4546 major atherosclerotic cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death) in eligible but untreated patients. Conclusions Alarming gaps exist in the contemporary use of evidence-based therapies in this large population of insured patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. These data provide a call to action for patients, providers, industry, regulators, professional societies, and payers to close these gaps in care.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud , Hipoglucemiantes , Brechas de la Práctica Profesional , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/clasificación , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/clasificación , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Brechas de la Práctica Profesional/normas , Brechas de la Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Data describing antibiotic use in U.S. nursing homes remain limited. We report antibiotic use among skilled nursing facility residents from 29 U.S. nursing homes and assessed correlations between antibiotics prescribed to residents in skilled care and nursing home characteristics. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Twenty-nine U.S. nursing homes in the same healthcare corporation. PARTICIPANTS: Residents receiving skilled care in 2016. MEASUREMENTS: We used pharmacy invoice and nursing home census data to calculate the days of antibiotic therapy per 1,000 days of skilled care (1,000 DOSC), the rate of antibiotic starts per 1,000 DOSC, the length of antibiotic therapy, and the average antibiotic spectrum index. We also assessed correlations between antibiotic use and nursing home characteristics. RESULTS: Antibiotics accounted for an average of 9.6% (±0.6%) of systemic medications prescribed among residents receiving skilled care. On average, 26.8% (±2.9%) of antibiotics were intravenous. Fluoroquinolones were prescribed at the highest rates (19% across all facilities), followed by beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (11%), first- and second-generation cephalosporins, sulfonamides, and oral tetracyclines (each at 9%). Both the proportion of residents using enrolled in Medicare and number of unique prescribers responsible for systemic prescriptions positively correlated with the rate of antibiotic starts. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that pharmacy invoices represent a useful and preexisting source of data for assessing antibiotic prescriptions among individuals receiving skilled nursing care. The correlation between the number of unique prescribers and antibiotic starts suggests that prescribers are central to efforts to improve antibiotic use in nursing homes.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Antibacterianos/clasificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/métodos , Vías de Administración de Medicamentos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Duración de la Terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cancer drug therapy costs continue to rise and threaten the sustainability of Canada's public healthcare system. Previous studies have calculated potential savings utilizing different dosing regimens of cancer treatments. Our objectives were to determine the financial impact of drug wastage and to explore cost-effective dosing regimens for pembrolizumab. METHODS: This was a retrospective study reviewing data for non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma patients at all six BC Cancer Regional Centres during fiscal years 2017 and 2018. Pembrolizumab waste amounts recorded in pharmacy wastage logs were totalled. Estimates of the number of vials used were compared between vial sharing and non-vial sharing practices to determine the cost differences. Costs for dosing regimens used during fiscal years 2017 and 2018 were compared to 2 mg/kg weight-based dosing (to a maximum of 200 mg), 2 mg/kg dosing rounding down within 5% and 10%, and flat dosing of 200 mg. RESULTS: There were a total of 202 non-small cell lung cancer and 182 melanoma patients with 2948 doses dispensed. Documented wastage was valued at $1,829,047.44 (8.65%) and across all six centres, vial sharing could reduce costs by $3,207,600.00 using the 100 mg vials. Compared to fiscal years 2017 and 2018, 2 mg/kg dosing (to a maximum of 200 mg) was the most cost-effective, decreasing costs by $222,719.20; flat dosing of 200 mg was the most expensive, increasing costs by $6,625,260.40. CONCLUSIONS: Having smaller vial sizes, practicing vial sharing, and using weight-based dosing all improve cost savings. Further investigations on the allocation of resources to optimize drug use and minimize wastage are needed.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Ahorro de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/economía , Colombia Británica/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/economía , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/epidemiología , Ahorro de Costo/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/economía , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/economía , Melanoma/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/economía , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: High HCV treatment uptake among people at most risk of transmission is essential to achieve elimination. We aimed to characterise subpopulations of people with HCV based on drug dependence, to estimate direct-acting antiviral (DAA) uptake in an unrestricted treatment era, and to evaluate factors associated with treatment uptake among people with recent drug dependence. METHODS: HCV notifications in New South Wales, Australia (1995-2017) were linked to opioid agonist therapy (OAT), hospitalisations, incarcerations, HIV notifications, deaths, and prescription databases. Drug dependence was defined as hospitalisation due to injectable drugs or receipt of OAT, with indicators in 2016-2018 considered recent. Records were weighted to account for spontaneous clearance. Logistic regression was used to analyse factors associated with treatment uptake among those with recent drug dependence. RESULTS: 57,467 people were estimated to have chronic HCV throughout the DAA era. Treatment uptake was highest among those with recent (47%), compared to those with distant (38%), and no (33%) drug dependence. Among those with recent drug dependence, treatment was more likely among those with HIV (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.71; 95% CI 1.24-2.36), recent incarceration (aOR 1.10; 95% CI 1.01-1.19), and history of alcohol use disorder (aOR 1.22; 95% CI 1.13-1.31). Treatment was less likely among women (aOR 0.78; 95% CI 0.72-0.84), patients of Indigenous ethnicity (aOR 0.75; 95% CI 0.69-0.81), foreign-born individuals (aOR 0.86; 95% CI 0.78-0.96), those with outer-metropolitan notifications (aOR 0.90; 95% CI 0.82-0.98), HBV coinfection (aOR 0.69; 95% CI 0.59-0.80), and >1 recent hospitalisation (aOR: 0.91; 95% CI 0.84-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence of high DAA uptake among people with recent drug dependence, including those who are incarcerated. Enhancing this encouraging initial uptake among high-risk populations will be essential to achieve HCV elimination. LAY SUMMARY: To facilitate HCV elimination, those at highest risk of infection and transmission are a treatment priority. This study shows the successes of Australia's universal provision of DAA therapy in reducing the barriers to treatment which have historically persisted among people who inject drugs. Despite higher DAA therapy uptake among those with recent drug dependence, gaps remain. Strategies which aim to reduce marginalisation and increase treatment uptake to ensure equitable HCV elimination must be advanced.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Erradicación de la Enfermedad , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Infecciones por VIH , Hepatitis C Crónica , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Bases de Datos Farmacéuticas/estadística & datos numéricos , Erradicación de la Enfermedad/métodos , Erradicación de la Enfermedad/organización & administración , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Hepatitis C Crónica/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Prisioneros/estadística & datos numéricos , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/diagnóstico , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rational medication use for treatment is mandatory, particularly in children as they are vulnerable to possible hazards of drugs. Understanding the medication use pattern is of importance to identify the problems of drug therapy and to improve the appropriate use of medication among this population. METHODS: A post-hoc study of the RV3-BB Phase IIb trial to children aged 0-18 months which was conducted in Indonesia during January 2013 to July 2016. Any concomitant medication use and health events among 1621 trial participants during the 18 months of follow-up were documented. Information on medication use included the frequency, formulation, indication, duration of usage, number of regimens, medication types, and therapeutic classes. RESULTS: The majority of participants (N = 1333/1621; 82.2%) used at least one non-antibiotic medication for treatment during the 18-month observation period. A total of 7586 medication uses were recorded, mostly in oral formulation (90.5%). Of all illnesses recorded, 24.7% were treated with a single drug regimen of non-antibiotic medication. The most common therapeutic classes used were analgesics/antipyretics (30.1%), antihistamines for systemic use (17.4%), cough and cold preparations (13.5%), vitamins (8.6%), and antidiarrheals (6.6%). The main medication types used were paracetamol (29.9%), chlorpheniramine (16.8%), guaifenesin (8.9%), zinc (4.6%), and ambroxol (4.1%). Respiratory system disorder was the most common reason for medication use (51.9%), followed by gastrointestinal disorders (19.2%), pyrexia (16.9%), and skin disorders (7.0%). CONCLUSION: A large number of children were exposed to at least one medication during their early life, including those where evidence of efficacy and safety in a pediatric population is lacking. This supports the need for further research on pediatric drug therapy to improve the appropriate use of medication in this population.
Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia/tendencias , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Analgésicos , Antipiréticos , Quimioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Femenino , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos , Humanos , Indonesia/epidemiología , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Preparaciones FarmacéuticasRESUMEN
Objectives Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) has been shown to effectively and safely prevent the anemia of prematurity and to reduce the transfusion need in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants and has been licensed for this indication in Europe in 1997. The objective of the study was to obtain information on the use or non-use of rhEPO in neonatal units in Germany and other European countries. Methods Anonymized 14-questions web-based questionnaire. Results Seventy-nine questionnaires from Germany and 63 questionnaires from other 15 European countries were completed. Of the responders, 39% indicated to use rhEPO routinely or occasionally in VLBW infants, whereas 61% responded to never use rhEPO in this population. The major reasons given for non-use were lack of recommendation in national guidelines (69%) and/or doubt about efficacy of rhEPO to reduce transfusion need (53%). Twenty-seven percent of the responders indicated to use rhEPO for neonates with birth weights above 1,500 g. Neuroprotection in VLBW infants (26%) and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in term neonates (27%) were given as indications for off label use of rhEPO. Conclusions This survey indicates that rhEPO is used for the anemia of prematurity as licensed in less than half of neonatal units in Germany and other European countries. On the other hand it seems to be used off label in neonates for neuroprotection in a considerable number of units although there is no final evidence on its neuroprotective effects.
Asunto(s)
Anemia Neonatal , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Epoetina alfa/administración & dosificación , Hipoxia-Isquemia Encefálica , Anemia Neonatal/etiología , Anemia Neonatal/prevención & control , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Hematínicos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Hipoxia-Isquemia Encefálica/etiología , Hipoxia-Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Salud del Lactante/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro/sangre , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso/sangre , Masculino , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Aims This study determined the impact of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on the utilisation and expenditure on oral anticoagulants (OACs) in the Irish Community healthcare setting. We also investigated aspects of DOAC prescribing. Methods Using anonymised prescription data from the HSE pharmacy claims database we investigated anticoagulant prescribing over the study period (1/1/2014 - 31/12/2018). Results Some 74,748 patients were being treated with OACs by the year end 2018 an increase of 30,319 over 5 years. Warfarin prescribing fell from 32,751 patients in 2014 to 16,166 by the year end 2018. Apixaban is the most frequently prescribed OAC and annual expenditure on DOACs now exceeds 51 million. Patients treated with DOACs are older than participants in the pivotal clinical trials and are frequently co-administered interacting drugs. Conclusion The introduction of DOACs has resulted in an overall increase in anticoagulant prescribing, a significant reduction in warfarin usage and a large increase in expenditure.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/economía , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/economía , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/economía , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Utilización de Medicamentos/economía , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Administración Oral , Factores de Edad , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Humanos , Irlanda , Pirazoles , Piridonas , Factores de Tiempo , WarfarinaRESUMEN
We aimed to study the changing popularity of oral anticoagulants and the potential association between media coverage and real-world utilization practice, using time series analysis.In this STROBE-compliant study, we used Google Trends data to study public interest for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) and warfarin in the United States (10-year coverage, beginning July 1st, 2008 ending June 30th, 2018). We validated our findings on a sample of 50 consecutive datasets (accumulated between July 6th, 2018 and October 19th, 2018), using the same search criteria. We used the LexisNexis Academic database to quantify monthly media coverage for DOACs and explored its association with interest by the public, using the cross-correlation coefficient function. Finally, we studied the association between public interest and real-world utilization data, including published US-wide data on ambulatory anticoagulation visits.The approval of dabigatran in 2010 marked an increasing public interest for DOACs. Dabigatran exhibited a steep rise early after Food and Drug Administration approval that peaks in 2011, to be surpassed sequentially by rivaroxaban (2012) and apixaban (2014). Apixaban has outperformed its competitors in popularity since mid-2017, and, by the end of the observation period, was close to warfarin that is on first place. Media coverage was low before approval of the first oral DOAC (dabigatran), increased thereafter (median 13 news articles per month vs 64, Pâ<â.001), with peaks on the approval dates (81 vs 48, Pâ=â.003). Media coverage had a weak immediate impact on DOACs public interest and public interest patterns preceded changes in ambulatory anticoagulation visits by up to 5 months.For a long-run observation period, a single Google Trends search will suffice to produce robust estimations of the relative popularity between treatment options, such as oral anticoagulants. Media coverage has limited immediate impact and relative public interest is a potential lead indicator of changes in actual utilization.
Asunto(s)
Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Opinión Pública , Medios de Comunicación Sociales/estadística & datos numéricos , Warfarina , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Percepción Social , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Background: Although antimicrobial stewardship programmes are one of the highest priorities in healthcare systems and many articles have been published, few refer to the implementation of antifungal stewardship and highlight specific points on which efforts should be focused. Objective: To assess the percentage of patients with confirmed candidaemia in whom de-escalation was conducted, and the economic impact of step-down or step-up antifungal therapy. Additionally, we attempted to estimate the potential increase in drug minimum inhibitory concentrations or to detect resistant strains of Candida species. Methods: We selected, retrospectively, patients who had received systemic antifungal therapy between 2011 and 2016 for documented candidaemia. Statistical analysis and diagrams were used to assess the results. Results: Of 157 patients with confirmed candidaemia, 58 received azoles, 74 echinocandinsand 18 liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy. 51 patients were eligible to step-down to fluconazole but only 23 patients did so. Furthermore, in nine patients unjustified step-up from fluconazole to echinocandins or liposomal amphotericin B was carried out. The additional cost incurred bythe healthcare system due to high prices of echinocandins and liposomal amphotericin B in comparison with fluconazole was211 837. Interestingly, it was found that one strain of C. albicans and two strains of C. glabrata were resistant to echinocandins. Conclusion: The presence of a multidisciplinary team, including an infection control specialist and a clinical pharmacist, would limit the prescription of advanced antifungal agents as empirical therapy. Moreover, this team would control the de-escalation process-where applicable-leading to a reduction in costs and, probably, a decrease in the emergence of resistant Candida species. These facts contribute to the broader discussion on the adoption of antifungal stewardship programmes.
Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/administración & dosificación , Candidemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacorresistencia Fúngica/efectos de los fármacos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/normas , Anfotericina B/administración & dosificación , Anfotericina B/efectos adversos , Antifúngicos/efectos adversos , Candidemia/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Fúngica/fisiología , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Equinocandinas/administración & dosificación , Equinocandinas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/normas , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Background: The point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial use organized by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC-PPS) and the Global Point Prevalence Survey of antimicrobial consumption (Global-PPS) were simultaneously performed in Belgian acute care hospitals in 2017. Methods: Belgian acute care hospitals were invited to participate in either the ECDC or Global-PPS. Hospital/ward/patient-level data were collected between September-December 2017. All patients present in the wards at 8 a.m. on the day of the PPS were included. The data of the ECDC and Global-PPS on antimicrobial consumption were pooled. Detailed data on HAIs were analysed for ECDC-PPS. Results: Overall, 110 Belgian acute care hospital sites participated in the ECDC and Global-PPS (countrywide participation rate: 81.4%, 28,007 patients). Overall, a crude prevalence of patients with at least one antimicrobial of 27.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 26.5-27.6%) was found. The most frequently reported indications were pneumonia (23.2%), urinary tract infections (15.2%) and skin and soft tissue infections (11.9%). The reason for antimicrobial use was recorded for 81.9% of the prescriptions, a stop/review date for 40.8% and compliance with local antibiotic guidelines for 76.6%. In the ECDC-PPS, the crude prevalence of patients with at least one HAI was 7.3% (95%CI 6.8-7.7%). Most frequently reported HAIs were pneumonia (21.6%) and urinary tract infections (21.3%). Conclusions: HAI and antimicrobial use prevalence remained stable in comparison with the previous PPS (7.1% and 27.4% in 2011 and 2015, respectively). Belgian hospitals should be further stimulated to set local targets to improve antibiotic prescribing and reduce HAI.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Bélgica/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The accurate assessment of antimicrobial use (AMU) requires relating quantities of active ingredients (AAIs) with population denominators. These data can be used to prioritize potential sources of selective pressure for antimicrobial resistance and to establish reduction targets. Here, we estimated AMU in Vietnam (human population 93.4 M in 2015), and compared it with European Union (EU) data (population 511.5 M in 2014). We extrapolated AMU data on each key animal species and humans from different published sources to calculate overall AMU (in tonnes) in Vietnam. We then compared these data with published statistics on AMU in the European Union (EU). A total of 3838 t of antimicrobials were used in Vietnam, of which 2751 (71.7%) corresponded to animal use, and the remainder (1086 t; 28.3%) to human AMU. This equates to 261.7 mg and 247.3 mg per kg of human and animal biomass, compared with 122.0 mg and 151.5 mg in the EU. The greatest quantities of antimicrobials (in decreasing order) were used in pigs (41.7% of total use), humans (28.3%), aquaculture (21.9%) and chickens (4.8%). Combined AMU in other species accounted for < 1.5%. These results are approximate and highlight the need to conduct targeted surveys to improve country-level estimates of AMU.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/clasificación , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Animales , Acuicultura , Pollos , Unión Europea , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Porcinos , VietnamAsunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/economía , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Hipoglucemiantes/economía , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Administración Oral , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/uso terapéutico , Dipeptidil-Peptidasas y Tripeptidil-Peptidasas , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) teams around the world include pharmacists; however, their impact is relatively unknown. This study aimed to explore the relationship between pharmacists' actions and antibiotic consumption. METHODS: Hospital pharmacists involved in the French antibiotic consumption surveillance network (ATB-Raisin) were invited to participate in a retrospective observational multicentre study. Collected data were: the previous year's (2016) antibiotic consumption expressed in daily defined dose per 1000 patient-days; AMS measures, including pharmacist-specific actions; and use of a computerised prescription order entry (CPOE) system. Associations between antibiotic consumption and AMS measures were assessed by linear regression, after adjustment for hospital activities. RESULTS: Annual data for 2016 from 77 hospitals (7260000 bed-days in 24000 beds) were analysed. Pharmacists were involved in AMS programs in 73% of hospitals, and were the antibiotic advisor in 25%. Pharmaceutical review of prescriptions was organised in almost all hospitals (97%). The univariable analysis identified five measures associated with lower overall antibiotic consumption: CPOE use (if >80% of prescriptions or 100%), pharmaceutical review (if >80% of beds or 100%) and the antibiotic advisor being a pharmacist (P=0.04, P=0.004 and P=0.003, respectively). In the multivariable analysis, two explanatory variables were significantly and independently associated with a lower overall antibiotic consumption: the antibiotic advisor being a pharmacist and a pharmaceutical review covering all beds (-19.9% [-31.6%; -8.1%], P=0.002 and -18.3% [-34.0%; -2.6%], P=0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic consumption was lower when the antibiotic advisor was a pharmacist and when the pharmaceutical team reviewed all prescriptions. These results highlight that actions initiated by pharmacists have a positive impact and should be supported.
Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/métodos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Farmacéuticos , Hospitales , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Rol Profesional , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medicines Use Reviews (MURs) and the New Medicine Service (NMS) are services delivered by UK community pharmacists to improve adherence, improve patient understanding of their medicines and reduce medicines wastage. AIM: In this scoping review we aim to identify, map and critically examine the nature of existing empirical evidence in peer reviewed journals relating to MUR and NMS consultations. METHOD: Systematic searches identified the available MUR and NMS empirical literature. We sought data on barriers and facilitators to conducting MUR or NMS consultations, the perceptions of pharmacists and patients, the conduct of consultations, and outcomes of consultations. Searches from 2005 (when MURs were introduced) to May 2018 were conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and Scopus databases. Data were extracted into Excel for examination of study characteristics, participant characteristics, type of intervention/services delivered and key study quantitative and/or qualitative findings. RESULTS: Forty-one papers from 37 studies met the inclusion criteria: 28 papers were of MURs, 10 of NMS and 3 for both services. Studies focused on the introduction and implementation of these services, with little attention to outcomes for patients; effectiveness was not evaluated beyond in a single NMS RCT. Observational data indicated that pharmacists and patients view MURs and the NMS positively, despite challenges implementing these services and apparent lack of communication between pharmacists and GPs. Consultations were reported to be short, typically 10-12â¯min, characterised by limited engagement with patients and their health problems. The extent and nature of advice on health behaviours during consultations or other content was rarely examined. CONCLUSION: The research literature on MURs and the NMS has developed slowly. There is much scope for further research attention to developing more patient-centred care.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/normas , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/normas , Farmacéuticos/normas , Rol Profesional , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/tendencias , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Humanos , Farmacéuticos/tendencias , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this integrative review is to synthesize research on the measurement of polypharmacy. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature databases Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and PubMed was conducted using a combination of terms/keywords to search existing studies to explore measures used to address polypharmacy. RESULTS: Several methods of measuring the existence of polypharmacy have been used in research. In addition to screening tools, the number of medications taken was used as an indicator of polypharmacy. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple methods of the measurement of polypharmacy have been used throughout the literature. Most methods related to the intended study objectives and population. The most frequently reported measure of screening was the Beers Criteria.
Asunto(s)
Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Polifarmacia , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To understand patterns of subcutaneous (SC) biologics use over time in adults with inflammatory rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases receiving a homecare delivery service. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Patients in secondary care receiving SC biologics in the largest Scottish Health Board. PARTICIPANTS: A new bespoke cohort was created from routine data gathered as part of a health board Homecare Service Database. Patients over 18 years who received a supply of SC biologic from January 2012 to May 2015 with a diagnosis for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were included. OUTCOMES MEASURED: A standardised framework was applied by measuring discontinuation rates, persistence using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression and adherence using medication refill adherence (MRA) and compliance rate (CR). RESULTS: 751 patients were identified (AS: 105, PsA: 227, RA: 419) of whom 89.3% had more than one biologic delivery (median days' follow-up: AS: 494; PsA: 544; RA: 529) and 83.2% did not switch biologic. For all conditions, approximately half were persistent on their index biologic (52% AS, 54% PsA, 48%RA). Of patients who discontinued treatment, the majority reinitiated with the same biologic (19% AS, 18% PsA and 21% RA). Overall adherence during the period of treatment was over 80% when calculated using MRA (median %MRA: AS: 84.0%, PsA: 85.0%, RA: 82.4%) or CR (median %CR: AS: 96.6%, PsA: 97%, RA: 96.6%). CONCLUSION: Use of linked routine data is a sustainable pathway to enable ongoing evaluation of biologics use. A more consistent approach to studying use (discontinuation, persistence and adherence metrics) should be adopted to enable comparability of studies.
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Adulto , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Sustitución de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/epidemiología , Escocia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BackgroundIn 2012, Israel's National Center for Infection Control initiated a national stewardship programme that included mandatory annual reporting of antimicrobial use. Here we present nationwide Israeli data for the period 2012 to 2017.AimThe goal of this study was to detect trends in antimicrobial use in Israel following the introduction of the stewardship programme, as part of an assessment of the programme's impact.MethodsIn this retrospective observational study, data were collected from Israel's health maintenance organisations (HMOs), acute care hospitals and post-acute care hospitals (PACHs). Acute care hospital data were collected for general medical and surgical wards, and medical/surgical intensive care units (ICUs). Data were converted into defined daily doses (DDD), with use rates presented as DDD per 1,000 insured/day in the community and DDD per 100 patient-days in hospitals and PACHs. Trends were analysed using linear regression.ResultsAntimicrobial use decreased across sectors between 2012 and 2017. In the community, the decrease was modest, from 22.8 to 21.8 DDD per 1,000 insured per day (4.4%, p = 0.004). In acute care hospitals, antibiotic DDDs per 100 patient-days decreased from 100.0 to 84.0 (16.0%, p = 0.002) in medical wards, from 112.8 to 94.2 (16.5%, p = 0.004) in surgical wards and from 154.4 to 137.2 (11.1%, p = 0.04) in ICUs. Antimicrobial use decreased most markedly in PACHs, from 29.1 to 18.1 DDD per 100 patient-days (37.8%, p = 0.005).ConclusionBetween 2012 and 2017, antimicrobial use decreased significantly in all types of healthcare institutions in Israel, following the introduction of the nationwide antimicrobial stewardship programme.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/tendencias , Carbapenémicos , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Israel , Notificación Obligatoria , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Whether early medication reconciliation and integration can reduce polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in the emergency department (ED) remains unclear. Polypharmacy and PIM have been recognized as significant causes of adverse drug events in older adults. Therefore, this pilot study was conducted to delineate this issue. DESIGN: An interventional study. SETTING: A medical center in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: Older ED patients (aged ≥65 years) awaiting hospitalization between December 1, 2017, and October 31, 2018 were recruited in this study. A multidisciplinary team and a computer-based and pharmacist-assisted medication reconciliation and integration system were implemented. MEASUREMENTS: The reduced proportions of major polypharmacy (≥10 medications) and PIM at hospital discharge were compared with those on admission to the ED between pre- and post-intervention periods. RESULTS: A total of 911 patients (pre-intervention = 243 vs post-intervention = 668) were recruited. The proportions of major polypharmacy and PIM were lower in the post-intervention than in the pre-intervention period (-79.4% vs -65.3%; P < .001, and - 67.5% vs -49.1%; P < .001, respectively). The number of medications was reduced from 12.5 ± 2.7 to 6.9 ± 3.0 in the post-intervention period in patients with major polypharmacy (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Early initiation of computer-based and pharmacist-assisted intervention in the ED for reducing major polypharmacy and PIM is a promising method for improving geriatric care and reducing medical expenditures. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2298-2304, 2019.
Asunto(s)
Revisión de la Utilización de Medicamentos/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Conciliación de Medicamentos/tendencias , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/organización & administración , Polifarmacia , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados/tendencias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica , Hospitalización , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Conciliación de Medicamentos/métodos , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico/organización & administración , Estudios Prospectivos , TaiwánRESUMEN
PURPOSE: A novel value-based approach to evaluate costly specialty drugs for formulary addition was developed. SUMMARY: In February 2016, Stanford Health Care launched the specialty drug subcommittee (SDSC), a subcommittee of the pharmacy and therapeutics committee, responsible for the formulary review of specialty pharmaceuticals. A process was developed for value-based review that includes not only consideration of clinical trial data and institutional acquisition costs but also internal patient outcomes and a cost-effectiveness model using internal financial data. A Markov model was developed to assess the value of trabectedin, which was approved for formulary addition in April 2016, relative to the addition of dacarbazine. The economic model and internal patient outcome analysis were presented to the prescribing oncologist and the SDSC for review. Internal data revealed that fewer patients than had been estimated received trabectedin, with outcomes significantly worse than those observed in the clinical trial leading to Food and Drug Administration approval. In the cost-effectiveness model, trabectedin had higher costs and poorer outcomes compared with dacarbazine. Based on the economic model, low utilization, and real-world outcomes, trabectedin was removed from formulary and a restrictive treatment pathway for nonformulary use, developed by the primary prescriber, was implemented. This process has since been applied to 11 more specialty drugs. CONCLUSION: Internal cost-effectiveness models in combination with real-world patient outcomes data can be effective formulary management tools. Engagement and collaboration with the requesting provider are key to developing thoughtful treatment pathways.