Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.449
Filtrar
1.
Acta Med Indones ; 56(2): 206-209, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39010778

RESUMEN

Pseudoaneurysms are false aneurysms that mostly occur at the site of arterial injury. Pseudoaneurysm is the most frequent complication after catheter-associated interventions and occurs because of an insufficient closure of the puncture site. However, there are several reported cases of patients with pseudoaneurysm without a prior history of vascular intervention. We described a case of ruptured giant abdominal aortic pseudoaneurysm in a patient with no prior history of vascular intervention, with an initial complaint of abdominal pain. The patient successfully received EVAR therapy using a kissing graft.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Humanos , Aneurisma Falso/etiología , Aneurisma Falso/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/complicaciones , Masculino , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/etiología , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Rotura Espontánea , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Persona de Mediana Edad
2.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 27(3): 249-252, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38963361

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Advanced pregnancy is associated with a higher risk of complicated aortopathies owing to the physiologic changes in pregnancy. The diagnosis can be elusive due to its rare incidence. The optimal treatment strategy is chosen based on the clinical condition of the patient, gestational age, and the severity of the aortic disease. A healthy young primigravida presented with acute chest pain in the early second trimester, diagnosed as a thoracic aortic aneurysm that had ruptured causing hemothorax. She underwent emergency endovascular repair under general anesthesia. Aortic disease should always be ruled out early in acute chest pain in pregnancy. Expeditious and strategic management helps improve maternal and fetal outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Rotura de la Aorta , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/cirugía , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/terapia , Adulto , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Anestesia General/métodos
3.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol ; 44(7): 1467-1473, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38924435

RESUMEN

CLINICAL PROBLEM: Most abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are small with low rupture risk (<1%/y) when diagnosed but slowly expand to ≥55 mm and undergo surgical repair. Patients and clinicians require medications to limit AAA growth and rupture, but drugs effective in animal models have not translated to patients. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INCREASING TRANSLATION FROM MOUSE MODELS: Use models that simulate human AAA tissue pathology, growth patterns, and rupture; focus on the clinically relevant outcomes of growth and rupture; design studies with the rigor required of human clinical trials; monitor AAA growth using reproducible ultrasound; and perform studies in both males and females. SUMMARY OF STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF MOUSE MODELS: The aortic adventitial elastase oral ß-aminopropionitrile model has many strengths including simulating human AAA pathology and modeling prolonged aneurysm growth. The Ang II (angiotensin II) model performed less well as it better simulates acute aortic syndrome than AAA. The elastase plus TGFß (transforming growth factor-ß) blocking antibody model displays a high rupture rate, making prolonged monitoring of AAA growth not feasible. The elastase perfusion and calcium chloride models both display limited AAA growth.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Rotura de la Aorta , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Animales , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/patología , Humanos , Rotura de la Aorta/prevención & control , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/patología , Elastasa Pancreática , Ratones , Aorta Abdominal/patología , Aorta Abdominal/efectos de los fármacos , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Abdominal/metabolismo , Femenino , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Masculino
4.
Br J Surg ; 111(5)2024 May 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782730

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Information on the predictive determinants of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture from CT angiography are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate biomechanical parameters in abdominal aortic aneurysms and their association with risk of subsequent rupture. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the digital radiological archive was searched for 363 patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. All patients who underwent at least one CT angiography examination before aneurysm rupture were included. CT angiography results were analysed to determine maximum aneurysm diameter, aneurysm volume, and biomechanical parameters (peak wall stress and peak wall rupture index). In the primary survival analysis, patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms less than 70 mm were considered. Sensitivity analyses including control patients and abdominal aortic aneurysms of all sizes were performed. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients who underwent 109 CT angiography examinations before aneurysm rupture were identified. The majority were men (47, 70%) and the median age at the time of CTA examination was 77 (71-83) years. The median maximum aneurysm diameter was 56 (interquartile range 46-65) mm and the median time to rupture was 2.13 (interquartile range 0.64-4.72) years. In univariable analysis, maximum aneurysm diameter, aneurysm volume, peak wall stress, and peak wall rupture index were all associated with risk of rupture. Women had an increased HR for rupture when adjusted for maximum aneurysm diameter or aneurysm volume (HR 2.16, 95% c.i. 1.23 to 3.78 (P = 0.007) and HR 1.92, 95% c.i. 1.06 to 3.50 (P = 0.033) respectively). In multivariable analysis, the peak wall rupture index was associated with risk of rupture. The HR for peak wall rupture index was 1.05 (95% c.i. 1.03 to 1.08) per % (P < 0.001) when adjusted for maximum aneurysm diameter and 1.05 (95% c.i. 1.02 to 1.08) per % (P < 0.001) when adjusted for aneurysm volume. CONCLUSION: Biomechanical factors appear to be important in the prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Women are at increased risk of rupture when adjustments are made for maximum aneurysm diameter alone.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Rotura de la Aorta , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/complicaciones , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/patología , Rotura de la Aorta/etiología , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales
5.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(11): e032715, 2024 Jun 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780177

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Saccular abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are considered to be at higher risk of rupture than fusiform AAAs, but not much is known about the extent of this risk. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the rupture presentation between fusiform and saccular AAAs. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective cohort study on 27 290 patients who underwent primary endovascular repair for a degenerative AAA between 2016 and 2019, and who were registered in the National Clinical Database in Japan. At operation for nonruptured case, the aneurysm diameter was significantly smaller in saccular AAAs than in fusiform AAAs (median, 44.0 versus 51.0 mm; P<0.001). Similarly, aneurysm diameter at rupture was significantly smaller in saccular AAAs than in fusiform AAAs (median, 55.6 versus 68.0 mm; P<0.001). The likelihood of repair for rupture was significantly higher in saccular AAAs than in fusiform AAAs in the 40- to 54-mm diameter range, in which saccular morphology was found to be an independent risk factor for rupture against fusiform morphology by adjusting for sex and aneurysm diameter (odds ratio, 2.54 [95% CI, 1.75-3.69]). In addition, receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the cutoff diameter to predict rupture was smaller in saccular AAAs than in fusiform AAAs (50.5 and 59.5 mm, respectively) based on the Youden index. CONCLUSIONS: Saccular AAAs presented at smaller diameters than fusiform AAAs in patients with ruptured AAAs treated with endovascular aortic repair, which supports the idea that saccular AAAs should be treated at smaller diameters.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Rotura de la Aorta , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Japón/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Resultado del Tratamiento , Medición de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad
6.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 19(1): 212, 2024 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38616278

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (rTAAA) represents a considerable challenge for surgeons. To date, endovascular procedures have not been able to completely replace open repair when debranching is required. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73-year-old man was admitted to our hospital after complaining of left lateral abdominal pain. Enhanced computed tomography revealed a left retroperitoneal hematoma and a large, ruptured Crawford type IV TAAA. We first performed emergency resuscitative surgery to close the lacerated foramen. A graft replacement was performed 1 month after the initial surgery when the patient had stabilized. At 5 years postoperatively, neither occlusion nor anastomotic pseudoaneurysm was noted on computed tomography. CONCLUSIONS: We provide an update on the perioperative management of patients undergoing open rTAAA repair. This procedure can be considered to ensure complete repair of an rTAAA.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso , Aneurisma de la Aorta Toracoabdominal , Rotura de la Aorta , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica
8.
Kyobu Geka ; 77(2): 101-105, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38459858

RESUMEN

A 75-year-old woman was diagnosed with type B acute aortic dissection 14 years ago and 3-channeled aortic dissection 7 years ago. She received total arch replacement 6 years ago and descending aortic replacement with double barrel anastomosis technique for distal anastomosis 5 years ago. Computed tomography( CT) revealed giant thyroid tumor and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm( 58 mm in diameter). She suffered from back pain during her follow-up period. CT revealed ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. First, the false lumen of descending aorta was closed by thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and then thoracoabdominal aortic replacement was performed uneventfully.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica , Aneurisma de la Aorta Toracoabdominal , Disección Aórtica , Rotura de la Aorta , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Aorta/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Vet Cardiol ; 52: 72-77, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38458041

RESUMEN

Aortocardiac fistula is a broad term used to describe defects between the aorta and other cardiac chambers that can occur in humans and animals. A 1.5-year-old, 1.7 kg, male castrated Holland lop rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) was presented for a two-week history of a heart murmur with corresponding cardiomegaly on radiographs. Physical examination confirmed a grade-V/VI continuous heart murmur on the right sternal border with a regular rhythm and a gallop sound. Echocardiography revealed an aortic-to-right-atrial fistula causing severe left-sided volume overload. Based on the echocardiographic findings, rupture of the right aortic sinus was suspected. Due to the poor prognosis, euthanasia was elected. On necropsy, a fistula was found connecting the right aortic sinus with the right atrium, without evidence of an inflammatory response nor evidence of an infectious etiology. The sudden onset of a heart murmur supported acquired fistulation from a ruptured aortic sinus (also known as the sinus of Valsalva), though a congenital malformation could not be completely excluded.


Asunto(s)
Rotura de la Aorta , Seno Aórtico , Animales , Conejos , Masculino , Seno Aórtico/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/veterinaria , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Atrios Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Atrios Cardíacos/patología , Rotura Espontánea/veterinaria , Fístula/veterinaria , Fístula/diagnóstico por imagen , Fístula Vascular/veterinaria , Fístula Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Fístula Vascular/etiología , Ecocardiografía/veterinaria , Cardiopatías/veterinaria , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Soplos Cardíacos/veterinaria , Soplos Cardíacos/etiología
10.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 105: 10-17, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492731

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Harborview Risk Score (HRS) was recently proposed as scoring tool to predict 30-day mortality in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs). The HRS assigns 1 point for each of the following preoperative characteristics: age > 76 years, pH < 7.2, creatinine level > 2 mg/dL (> 176.8 µmol/L), and systolic blood pressure < 70 mm Hg, resulting in scores from 0 to 4. The 30-day mortality risk increases with every point. Primarily, we aimed to validate the HRS for the first time in a Dutch study population. A second objective was to identify other clinically relevant predictors for 30-day mortality after repair of rAAA. METHODS: Retrospective data from patients who underwent open repair or endovascular aortic repair for a rAAA between January 2009 and February 2022 were reviewed. Patients were grouped by HRS category (score 0-4). The 30-day mortality rate was calculated for each HRS category. Determinants for 30-day mortality were tested for significance and validated for HRS. RESULTS: In total, data from 135 patients were included. Open repair was performed in 95 patients and 40 patients underwent endovascular aortic repair. Univariate logistic regression identified pH < 7.2, systolic blood pressure < 70 mm Hg, female sex, performance status, and increase per HRS unit as significant determinants for 30-day mortality. After adjusting for sex and performance status in the multivariate analysis, the association between the HRS per-unit increase and 30-day mortality remained significant (odds ratio 2.532 (95% confidence interval: 1.437-4.461)). The 30-day mortality rate for HRS score 0 was 15.2%, while for HRS score 3 and 4 the mortality was 80% and 100% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Harborview Risk Score was validated in this single-center Dutch population. Results were concordant with data presented in earlier studies. Therefore, the HRS seems accurate and accessible as preoperative tool. For now, the HRS should guide as an insightful tool to indicate the chances of postoperative mortality during the preoperative conversations in the emergency room, rather than as a decision-making tool whether to operate or not. Our results suggest that female sex and performance status are also relevant predictors that should be assessed in other populations to improve preoperative scoring systems.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Rotura de la Aorta , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Países Bajos , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad
11.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 19(1): 53, 2024 Feb 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38311759

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA) is an extremely rare condition, and its rupture causes acute symptoms such as chest pain and dyspnea. Ruptured SVA is frequently associated with other congenital defects. CASE PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old male presented with SVA originating from the left coronary sinus that ruptured into the interventricular septum. SVA was diagnosed by echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and confirmed during the operation. CONCLUSIONS: SVA is a rare cardiac abnormality which can lead to severe clinical symptoms upon rupture. Immediate surgery is necessary to repair the ruptured SVA.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta , Enfermedades de la Aorta , Disección Aórtica , Rotura de la Aorta , Seno Coronario , Seno Aórtico , Tabique Interventricular , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Seno Aórtico/diagnóstico por imagen , Seno Aórtico/cirugía , Seno Aórtico/patología , Tabique Interventricular/diagnóstico por imagen , Tabique Interventricular/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/complicaciones , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Aorta/complicaciones , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen
12.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 68(5): 693-701, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38415353

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) require immediate vascular treatment to survive. The use of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may support clinical assessment, correct diagnosis, appropriate triage and reduce system delay. The aim was to study the process of care and outcome in patients receiving prehospital POCUS versus patients not receiving prehospital POCUS in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending aortic rupture. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients diagnosed with rAAA in the Central Denmark Region treated by a prehospital critical care physician from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. Performance of prehospital POCUS was extracted from the prehospital electronic health records. System delay was defined as the time from the emergency phone call to the emergency medical service dispatch centre until the start of surgery. Data on patients primary hospital admission to a centre with/without vascular treatment expertise, treatments and complications including death were extracted from electronic health records. RESULTS: We included 169 patients; prehospital POCUS was performed in 124 patients (73%). Emergency surgical treatment was performed in 71 patients. The overall survival in the POCUS group was 39% versus 16% in the NO POCUS group (hazard ratio (HR) (95% 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, p = .011). In the POCUS group 99/124 (80%) were directly admitted to a vascular surgical centre versus 25/45 (56%) in the NO POCUS, RD 24% (95% CI: 8-40)), (p = .002). In the POCUS group, system delay was a median of 142 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 121-189) and a median of 232 minutes (IQR 166-305) in the NO POCUS group (p = .006). In a multivariable analysis incorporating age, sex, previously known rAAA, and typical clinical symptoms of rAAA, the HR for death was 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86 (p = .008) favouring prehospital POCUS. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital POCUS was associated with reduced time to treatment, higher chance of operability and significantly higher 30-day survival in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending rupture of an AAA in this retrospective study. Residual confounding cannot be excluded. This study supports the clinical relevance of prehospital POCUS of the abdominal aorta.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Rotura de la Aorta , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aneurisma Ilíaco , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma Ilíaco/etiología , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo
13.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(4): 2037-2040, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38308762

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to immune checkpoint inhibitors may lead to discontinuation and treatment-related death. Acute aortitis is a rare but severe irAE. CASE PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old man with recurrent lower gingival carcinoma received nivolumab therapy. Twenty-three months later, he experienced chest compression, which resulted in syncope. Following a whole-body computed tomography (CT) scanning, which revealed diffuse thickening of the aorta, and systemic assessments of the causes of aortitis, he was diagnosed with acute aortitis due to irAE. Nivolumab discontinuation and oral steroids improved CT findings. However, 11 months after nivolumab discontinuation, he developed an aortic aneurysmal rupture. Endovascular aortic repair rescued him. A durable anti-cancer response was still observed 4 months after the aortic rupture. CONCLUSION: Although severe irAE, such as acute aortitis, occurred, the patient may still achieve a durable response. A broad examination and prompt treatment of irAE can help improve the patient's survival.


Asunto(s)
Rotura de la Aorta , Aortitis , Carcinoma , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Nivolumab/efectos adversos , Aortitis/inducido químicamente , Aortitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/inducido químicamente , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
14.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 102: 152-159, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38307230

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Unlike western countries, which have reported distinct decreases in incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) over the last few decades, epidemiologic studies in Korea have not shown significant changes in incidence or mortality of rAAA. The purpose of this study was to analyze the changes in rAAA treatment outcomes and various associated risk factors over the past 2 decades. METHODS: A 20-year retrospective multicenter review for rAAA cases from the period of January 2000 to December 2020 was undertaken. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative clinical data were extracted for patients diagnosed with rAAA. For analysis, outcomes from the early era, defined as patients treated between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2010, were compared with outcomes from the late era, defined as patients treated between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020. RESULTS: The total in-hospital mortality was 34.1% in the early era compared to 44.8% in the late era. Patients in the late era were older than those in the early era (75.2 ± 10.3 years vs. 70.3 ± 8.9 years; P = 0.009). Treatment with rAAA endovascular aneurysm repair increased from 2.3% in early to 13.8% in late era (P = 0.031). In the early era, more patients were operated by experienced surgeons than the late era (78.1% vs. 45.9%; P = 0.002). The emergency room to operating room time did not show improvement over the 20 years. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that mortality rate of rAAA in Korea has not changed over the last 2 decades. The study suggests the need for national preventive strategies, improved systemic coordination, and potential centralization of vascular services to enhance survival rates for rAAA.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Rotura de la Aorta , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
17.
J Vasc Surg ; 79(6): 1369-1378, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38316346

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: There are a variety of methods used today to treat common iliac aneurysms with endovascular techniques. Of these approaches, little is known about whether a particular limb strategy influences endoleak, reintervention, or aneurysm regression rates. We present 5-year data comparing endoleak, stent graft migration, fracture, aneurysm sac dynamics, and aortic rupture rates among patients treated with bell bottom limbs (BB), iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE), and coil and cover (CC) approaches from the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment registry. Secondary end points were all-cause mortality, stroke, reintervention, and paraplegia. METHODS: Subjects from the GORE Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment were enrolled over a 5-year period from October 2017 to August 2022. We included 924 subjects in this study. Statistical data was generated on R software and limb groups were compared using the Pearson's χ2 test and the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test. RESULTS: We found no statistical difference in endoleak rates, stent graft migration, fracture, or aortic rupture when stratified by limb strategy. There was no difference between limb approaches with regard to aneurysm sac dynamics among those with abdominal aortic aneurysms and common iliac aneurysms. Similarly, no statistical difference between limb strategies was found in all-cause mortality, stroke, paraplegia, or reintervention rates. Among patients that required an additional graft during reintervention, the highest rates were found within the IBE group 8.6%, compared with BB group 2.2% and CC group 1.3% (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was no difference among limb strategies in endoleak rates, stent graft migration, aneurysm sac dynamics, aortic rupture rates, or our secondary end points. Increased rates of reintervention requiring an additional graft within the IBE group is noteworthy and must be weighed against the adverse effects of hypogastric sacrifice with the CC approach or potentially less advantageous seal zones in the BB approach. This finding suggests that all limb approaches have equivalent effectiveness in managing the aneurysmal common iliac artery; thus, the choice of limb strategy should be individualized and remain at physician discretion. Future research should include a more robust sample size to reproduce these findings.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aneurisma Ilíaco , Diseño de Prótesis , Sistema de Registros , Stents , Humanos , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirugía , Aneurisma Ilíaco/mortalidad , Aneurisma Ilíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Endofuga/etiología , Endofuga/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Falla de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/etiología
20.
Eur J Radiol ; 171: 111286, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38215531

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between the outflow morphology and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture risk, to find risk factors for future prediction models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 46 patients with ruptured AAAs and 46 patients with stable AAAs using a 1:1 match for sex, age, and maximum aneurysm diameter. The chi-square test, paired t-test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare variables. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate variables potentially associated with AAA rupture. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to assess the regression models. RESULTS: Ruptured AAAs had a shorter proximal aortic neck (median (interquartile range, IQR): 24.0 (9.4-34.2) mm vs. 33.3 (20.0-52.8) mm, p = 0.004), higher tortuosity (median(IQR): 1.35 (1.23-1.49) vs. 1.29 (1.23-1.39), p = 0.036), and smaller minimum luminal area of the right common iliac artery (CIA) (median (IQR): 86.7 (69.9-126.4) mm2 vs. 118.9 (86.3-164.1)mm2, p = 0.001) and left CIA (median(IQR): 92.2 (67.3,125.1) mm2 vs. 110.7 (80.12, 161.1) mm2, p = 0.010) than stable AAA did. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated significant associations of the minimum luminal area of the bilateral CIAs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.996, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.991-0.999, p = 0.037), neck length (OR = 0.969, 95 % CI 0.941-0.993, p = 0.017), and aneurysm tortuosity (OR = 1.031, 95 % CI 1.003-1.063, p = 0.038) with ruptured AAAs. The AUC of this regression model was 0.762 (95 % CI 0.664-0.860, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The smaller minimum luminal area of the CIA is associated with an increased risk of rupture. This study highlights the potential of utilizing outflow parameters as novel and additional tools in risk assessment. It also provides a compelling rationale to further intensify research in this area.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Rotura de la Aorta , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/epidemiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...