Which one is the best in treating deep venous thrombosis -- percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, catheter-directed thrombolysis or combination of them?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment outcomes among percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) with AngioJet, Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), and a combination of both. METHODS: One hundred forty nine patients with acute or sub-acute iliac-femoral vein thrombosis accepting CDT and/or PMT were divided into three groups respectively: PMT group, CDT group, PMT + CDT group (PMT followed by CDT). The severity of thrombosis was evaluated by venographic scoring system. Technical success was defined as restored patent deep venous blood flow after CDT and/or PMT. Clinical follow-up were assessed by ultrasound or venography imaging. The primary endpoints were recurrence of DVT, and severity level of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) during the follow-up. RESULTS: Technical success and immediate clinical improvements were achieved on all patients. The proportion of sub-acute DVT and the venographic scoring in PMT + CDT group were significantly higher than that in CDT group and PMT group (proportion of sub-acute DVT: p = 0.032 and p = 0.005, respectively; venographic scoring: p < 0.001, respectively). The proportion of May-Thurner Syndrome was lower in PMT group than that in CDT and PMT + CDT group (p = 0.026 and p = 0.005, respectively). The proportion of DVT recurrence/stent thrombosis was significantly higher in CDT group than that in PMT + CDT group (p = 0.04). The severity of PTS was the highest in CDT group ( χ2 = 14.459, p = 0.006) compared to PMT group (p = 0.029) and PMT + CDT group (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Patients with sub-acute DVT, high SVS scoring and combined May-Thurner Syndrome were recommended to take PMT + CDT treatment and might have lower rate of DVT recurrence/stent thrombosis and severe PTS. Our study provided evidence detailing of PMT + CDT therapy.

Risk of developing post thrombotic syndrome after deep vein thrombosis with different anticoagulant regimens: A systematic review and pooled analysis.

BACKGROUND: Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is common in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It is unclear if different types of anticoagulant therapies (e.g. vitamin K antagonists (VKA), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)) are associated with different risks of PTS. We sought to assess the incidence rates of PTS development following a proximal DVT of the lower extremity managed with different types of anticoagulation regimens. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed, from inception to June 2023 was performed. The primary outcome was development of PTS. The secondary outcomes included severe PTS, venous ulcers, and major bleeding. Incidence rates were pooled using the random effects model and expressed as event per 100 patient-years with its associated 95 % confidence intervals (CI) using R software. RESULTS: A total of 21 (4342 patients) articles were included in the analysis. The adjusted pooled incidence of PTS was 15.1 (95 % CI: 8.7 to 26.1), 18.2 (95 % CI: 9.4 to 35.1) and 24.6 (95 % CI: 9.2 to 65.5) per 100 patient-years patients managed with VKA, DOAC and LMWH, respectively. The adjusted pooled incidence of severe PTS was 5.1 (95 % CI: 2.6 to 10.0) and 0.2 (95 % CI: 0.01 to 2.7) per 100 patient-years for VKAs and DOACs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The development of PTS is common in patients with proximal lower extremity DVT. The incidence rates of PTS seem to be similar across the different anticoagulation regimens, but severe PTS may be lower among patients receiving a DOAC.

Development and validation of a risk prediction model and prediction tools for post-thrombotic syndrome in patients with lower limb deep vein thrombosis.

PURPOSE: Our research aims to compare the predictive performance of decision tree algorithms (DT) and logistic regression analysis (LR) in constructing models, and develop a Post-Thrombotic Syndrome (PTS) risk stratification tool. METHODS: We retrospectively collected and analyzed relevant case information of 618 patients diagnosed with DVT from January 2012 to December 2021 in three different tertiary hospitals in Jiangxi Province as the modeling group. Additionally, we used the case information of 212 patients diagnosed with DVT from January 2022 to January 2023 in two tertiary hospitals in Hubei Province and Guangdong Province as the validation group. We extracted electronic medical record information including general patient data, medical history, laboratory test indicators, and treatment data for analysis. We established DT and LR models and compared their predictive performance using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and confusion matrices. Internal and external validations were conducted. Additionally, we utilized LR to generate nomogram charts, calibration curves, and decision curves analysis (DCA) to assess its predictive accuracy. RESULTS: Both DT and LR models indicate that Year, Residence, Cancer, Varicose Vein Operation History, DM, and Chronic VTE are risk factors for PTS occurrence. In internal validation, DT outperforms LR (0.962 vs 0.925, z = 3.379, P < 0.001). However, in external validation, there is no significant difference in the area under the ROC curve between the two models (0.963 vs 0.949, z = 0.412, P = 0.680). The validation results of calibration curves and DCA demonstrate that LR exhibits good predictive accuracy and clinical effectiveness. A web-based calculator software of nomogram (https://sunxiaoxuan.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/) was utilized to visualize the logistic regression model. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of decision tree and logistic regression models, along with the web-based calculator software of nomogram, can assist healthcare professionals in accurately assessing the risk of PTS occurrence in individual patients with lower limb DVT.

Addressing the Impact of Deep Venous Stenting on the Management of Venous Ulcer.

BACKGROUND: Venous ulcers are a late and severe form of chronic venous insufficiency and account for 70% of all etiologies that cause leg ulcers in the lower limb, and they account for 20% of the 2.5 million cases complaining of chronic venous disease. Our study aims to investigate the effect of venous stenting of the deep veins on the healing of the venous ulcer. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective study conducted on prospectively recorded medical records of 78 patients with chronic deep venous diseases-C6 (either nonocclusive iliac venous lesion or post-thrombotic syndrome). Our lesion involved May-Thurner lesions, occlusions, insufficiencies, or stenoses owing to an affection of the venous outflow segment. All our patients underwent endovascular management, and those who did not respond successfully were transitioned to compression therapy. We then compared the outcomes of both groups in terms of ulcer healing and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients (78 limbs), with a mean age of 39.6 ± 8.06 (range: 22-60) years, were treated. Fifty-four patients (67.9%) were males, and 24 (32.1%) were female. The etiology was primary nonocclusive iliac venous lesion in 12 limbs (16.2%) and secondary post-thrombotic obstructions in 66 (83.7%). Follow-up of the ulcer with compliance to compression therapy and standard care of the ulcer, sustained ulcer healing (reduction in ulcer area) was achieved in 60% of limbs, and most of the nonocclusive healing occurred within the first 3 months (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that deep venous stenting is associated with high wound healing rates. This rate reaches a statistically significant difference in 3 months, but this difference doesn't reach statistical significance at 6 months, with less recurrence and improved quality of life with a high cumulative patency rate, and compression therapy is the mainstay of the conservative management of venous ulceration.

A Retrospective Study Comparing Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy with Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety between pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in the context of acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT). METHODS: A retrospective review of our institution's patient database spanning from February 2011 to December 2019 was performed to identify cases of acute LEDVT. The patients were categorized into 2 distinct groups based on the thrombolytic interventions administered: the PMT group, specifically denoting PMT with AngioJet in our investigation, and the CDT group. Comprehensive data sets encompassing patient demographics, risk factors, procedural specifics, thrombolysis grading, and complications were collected. Subsequent follow-up evaluations at the 2-year mark posttreatment included assessments of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) and the quality of life. RESULTS: Among the 348 patients identified (mean age: 50.12 ± 15.87 years; 194 females), 200 underwent CDT during the early stage (2011 to 2017), while 148 received PMT between 2017 and 2019. Baseline data between the 2 groups exhibited no statistically significant differences. Thrombus scores significantly decreased in both cohorts posttherapy (each P < 0.001).Patients subjected to PMT demonstrated higher thrombolysis rates (77.35 ± 9.44% vs. 50.85 ± 6.72%), reduced administration of the thrombolytic agent urokinase [20 (20€20) vs. 350 (263€416), P < 0.001], larger limb circumference differences (above the knee: 6.03 ± 1.76 cm vs. 4.51 ± 1.82 cm, P < 0.001; below the knee: 2.90 ± 1.16 cm vs. 2.51 ± 0.90 cm, P < 0.001), and shorter lengths of stay (7.19 ± 3.11 days vs. 12.33 ± 4.77 days, P < 0.001). However, the PMT group exhibited a higher decline in hemoglobin levels (13.41 ± 10.59 g/L vs. 10.88 ± 11.41 g/L, P = 0.038) and an increase in creatinine levels [9.58 (2.32€15.82) umol/L vs. 4.53 (2.87€6.08) umol/L, P < 0.001] compared to the CDT group. No statistically significant differences were observed in the numbers of balloon angioplasty, stent implantation (each P > 0.050), and minor and major complications between the 2 groups. At the 1-year follow-up, PTS occurred in 13.51% of the PMT group compared to 26% of the CDT group (P = 0.025), with a higher incidence of moderate-severe PTS in the CDT group (8% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.036). At the 2-year follow-up, PTS was observed in 16.2% of the PMT group and 31.5% in the CDT group, P = 0.004. Preoperative and postoperative D-values of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary and SF-36 Mental Component Summary showed no statistically significant between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS: In our institutional experience, both PMT and CDT have proven to be effective and safe therapeutic approaches for managing acute LEDVT. PMT, in particular, demonstrated superior efficacy in achieving thrombosis resolution and mitigating the risk of PTS, affirming its role as a favorable intervention in this clinical context.

Acute phase determinant of post-thrombotic syndrome: A review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is the main long-term complication of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Several therapies are being evaluated to prevent or to treat PTS. Identifying the patients most likely to benefit from these therapies presents a significant challenge. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to identify risk factors for PTS during the acute phase of DVT. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We searched the PubMed and Cochrane databases for studies published between January 2000 and January 2021, including randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews and observational studies. RESULTS: Risk factors for PTS such as proximal location of DVT, obesity, chronic venous disease, history of DVT are associated with higher risk of PTS. On the initial ultrasound-Doppler, a high thrombotic burden appears to be a predictor of PTS. Among the evaluated biomarkers, some inflammatory markers such as ICAM-1, MMP-1 and MMP-8 appear to be associated with a higher risk of developing PTS. Coagulation disorders are not associated with risk of developing PTS. Role of endothelial biomarkers in predicting PTS has been poorly explored. Lastly, vitamin K antagonist was associated with a higher risk of developing PTS when compared to direct oral anticoagulants and low molecular weight heparin. CONCLUSIONS: Several risk factors during the acute phase of VTE are associated with an increased risk of developing PTS. There is a high-unmet medical need to identify potential biomarkers for early detection of patients at risk of developing PTS after VTE. Inflammatory and endothelial biomarkers should be explored in larger prospective studies to identify populations that could benefit from new therapies.

Final 3-Year Study Outcomes from the Evaluation of the Zilver Vena Venous Stent for the Treatment of Symptomatic Iliofemoral Venous Outflow Obstruction (The VIVO Clinical Study).

PURPOSE: To report 3-year outcomes from a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, single-arm study designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Zilver Vena Venous Stent for the treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The VIVO study included patients with symptomatic obstruction of 1 iliofemoral venous segment (ie, 1 limb), characterized by a Clinical, Etiological, Anatomic, Pathophysiology (CEAP) clinical classification of ≥3 or a Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) for pain of ≥2. Patients were retrospectively grouped based on baseline clinical presentation as postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), nonthrombotic iliac vein (NIVL) obstruction, or acute deep vein thrombosis (aDVT). Clinical improvement was assessed by change in VCSS, Venous Disability Score, Chronic Venous Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-20) scores, and CEAP C classification. Stent performance was evaluated by rates of patency by ultrasound (US), freedom from clinically driven reintervention, and freedom from stent fracture. RESULTS: The 3-year results for the 243 patients in the VIVO cohort included a 90.3% rate of patency by US and a 92.6% rate of freedom from clinically driven reintervention. The 3-year rates of patency by US for the NIVL, aDVT, and PTS groups were 100%, 84.0%, and 86.1%, respectively. Sustained clinical improvement through 3 years was demonstrated by changes in VCSS, Venous Disability Score, CIVIQ-20, and CEAP C classification. No stent fractures were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The VIVO study demonstrated sustained high rates of patency and freedom from clinically driven reintervention and improvements in venous clinical symptoms through 3 years. Each patient group (NIVL, aDVT, and PTS) showed clinical improvement and sustained patency through 3 years; some variation existed among groups (eg, only the NIVL group had a 100% patency rate).

Fibrinogen levels and clot properties identify patients who benefit from catheter-directed thrombolysis after DVT.

ABSTRACT: Ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis (UA-CDT) to improve patency after deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has not conclusively been shown to prevent postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) but might benefit patients who are unlikely to obtain patency with standard treatment. We hypothesized that these patients could be selected based on their fibrin clot properties. To study this, patients with acute iliofemoral DVT from the CAVA (Ultrasound-Accelerated Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Versus Anticoagulation for the Prevention of Post-thrombotic Syndrome) trial had blood samples taken at inclusion. Fibrin clot properties in plasma were determined by turbidimetric clotting (lag time and maximal turbidity) and lysis assays (time to 50% lysis and lysis rate), permeation assay, and confocal microscopy (fiber density), as well as levels of fibrin clot modifiers fibrinogen and C-reactive protein (CRP). Patency was defined as >90% iliofemoral vein compressibility at 12-month ultrasound. PTS was defined as ≥5 Villalta score at 6 or 12 months. In total, 91 of 152 patients were included, including 43 with additional UA-CDT and 48 with standard treatment. Patients with additional UA-CDT more often obtained patency (55.8 vs 27.1%) Patients who obtained patency had longer lag times and lower maximal turbidity, fibrinogen, and CRP; only maximal turbidity and fibrinogen remained associated when adjusting for treatment, thrombus load, and body mass index. Fibrinogen levels had an optimal cutoff at 4.85 g/L. Low fibrinogen levels best predicted patency. Additional UA-CDT decreased the risk of PTS only in patients with high fibrinogen. Therefore, additional UA-CDT might prevent PTS in selected patients based on routinely measured fibrinogen levels. This study was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT00970619.

Impact of great saphenous vein ablation on healing and recurrence of venous leg ulcers in patients with post-thrombotic syndrome: A retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment approach for patients with active venous leg ulcers (VLUs) and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) associated with great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux remains unclear. To address this gap, we retrospectively compared the outcomes of patients with post-thrombotic VLU with an intact GSV vs those with a stripped or ablated GSV. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 48 patients with active VLUs and documented PTS, who were treated at a single center between January 2018 and December 2022. Clinical information, including ulcer photographs, was recorded in a prospectively maintained digital database at the initial and follow-up visits. Two patient groups-group A (with an intact GSV) and group B (with a stripped or ablated GSV)-were compared in terms of time to complete healing, proportion of ulcers achieving complete healing, and ulcer recurrence during the follow-up period. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, gender, initial ulcer size, or ulcer duration between the two groups. All included patients had femoropopliteal post-thrombotic changes. Group A had significantly more completely healed ulcers (33 of 34 ulcers, 97%) compared with group B (10 of 14 ulcers, 71%) (P = .008). Group A also exhibited a significantly shorter time to complete ulcer healing (median: 42.5 days, interquartile range [IQR]: 65) compared with group B (median: 161 days, IQR: 530.5) (P = .0177), with a greater probability of ulcer healing (P = .0084). Long-term follow-up data were available for 45 of 48 patients (93.7%), with a mean duration of 39.6 months (range: 5.7-67.4 months). The proportion of ulcers that failed to heal or recurred during the follow-up period was significantly lower in group A (9 of 32 ulcers, 27%) compared with group B (11 of 13 ulcers, 85%) (P = .0009). In addition, in a subgroup analysis, patients with an intact but refluxing GSV (12 of 34) had a significantly shorter time to heal (median: 34 days, IQR: 57.25) (P = .0242), with a greater probability of ulcer healing (P = .0091) and significantly fewer recurrences (2 of 12, 16%) (P = .006) compared with group B. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that removal of the GSV through stripping or ablation in patients with post-thrombotic deep venous systems affecting the femoropopliteal segment may result in delayed ulcer healing and increased ulcer recurrence. Patients with an intact GSV had better outcomes, even when the refluxing GSV was left untreated. These findings emphasize the potential impact of GSV treatment on the management of VLUs in individuals with PTS. Further investigation is needed to validate these results and explore alternative therapeutic strategies to optimize outcomes for this patient population.

Effectiveness, reach, uptake and feasibility of digital health interventions for adults with venous thromboembolism: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Prevention of recurrence after an episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and also the post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), is still a recognised challenge. In this meta-analysis, we will summarise existing evidence to compare intelligent system follow-up and routine follow-up for patients with VTE. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies will be included from the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The last search time will be 31 March 2024. Two reviewers will independently identify RCTs and cohort studies according to eligibility and exclusion criteria. The risk of bias of included cohort studies will be assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, Methodological Index of Non-Randomised Studies, and the risk of bias of RCTs will be assessed with and Cochrane Collaboration's tool. The primary outcomes include overall survival rate and PTS incidence rate. The Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool will be used to assess the level of evidence for outcome from RCTs. RevMan V.5.4 software will be used to pool outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine Science Research Ethics Committee (SH9H-2023-T466-1). The findings will be disseminated to the public through conference presentations and publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023410644.

The TOPOS study.

Background: We aimed to study the long-term safety and efficacy of oblique venous stents for post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) with iliac vein compression. Patients and methods: In the multinational, prospective, single-arm TOPOS study, PTS patients scheduled for endovascular therapy with the sinus-Obliquus® stent and optional distal extension with the sinus-Venous® or sinus-XL Flex® stent were enrolled at eight European vascular centres between October 2016 and December 2020. The primary outcome was primary stent patency at 24 months, and secondary outcomes included the clinical course of PTS (Villalta score, revised Venous Clinical Severity Score [rVCSS], Visual Analog Scale [VAS] of pain), quality of life changes (Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life Questionnaire, CIVIQ-20), and device-related complications. Results: We enrolled 60 patients (mean age 46±15 years, 68% women, 13% active ulcers): 80% required stent extension (70% below the inguinal ligament). The primary patency rate at 24 months was 80.7% (95%CI 68.1-90.0%); it was higher in patients without vs. those with stent extension (90.9% vs. 78.3%, p=.01). Compared to baseline, the Villalta, rVCSS, pain VAS, and CIVIQ-20 decreased by a median of 8 (interquartile range (IQR): 4-11), 5 (IQR: 3-7), 3 (IQR: 2-5), and 17 (IQR: 6-22) points, respectively; p<.001 for all parameters. Overall, 9 events of acute stent occlusion, 4 symptomatic stent stenosis, and 1 pulmonary embolism occurred. We did not observe major bleeding events or contralateral thrombosis. Conclusions: Endovascular treatment with the oblique stent and optional stent extension was safe and resulted in high patency rates at 24 months. The reduction in PTS severity was substantial and persisted over 2-year follow-up.

Three-Year Outcomes of the Abre Venous Self-Expanding Stent System in Patients with Symptomatic Iliofemoral Venous Outflow Obstruction.

PURPOSE: To report 36-month outcomes and subgroup analysis of the ABRE study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the Abre venous self-expanding stent system for the treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction disease. METHODS: The ABRE study was a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study that enrolled and implanted Abre venous stents in 200 participants (mean age 51.5 years [SD ± 15.9], 66.5% women) with symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction at 24 global sites. Outcomes assessed through 36 months included patency, major adverse events, stent migration, stent fracture, and quality-of-life changes. Adverse events and imaging studies were adjudicated by independent clinical events committee and core laboratories, respectively. RESULTS: Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency through 36 months by Kaplan-Meier estimates were 81.6%, 84.8%, and 86.3%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of major adverse events through 36 months was 10.2%, mainly driven by 12 thrombosis events. Subgroup analyses demonstrated a primary patency of 76.5% in the acute deep vein thrombosis group, 70.4% in the postthrombotic syndrome group, and 97.1% in the nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion group through 36 months. The overall mean lesion length was 112.4 mm (SD ± 66.1). There were no stent fractures or migrations in this study. Quality of life and venous functional assessments demonstrated significant improvements from baseline to 36 months across all patient subsets. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the ABRE study demonstrated sustained patency with a good safety profile after implantation of a dedicated venous stent in patients with symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction disease.

Comparison of anticoagulation vs mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the comparative effects of treatment with contemporary mechanical thrombectomy (MT) or anticoagulation (AC) on Villalta scores and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) incidence through 12 months in iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: Patients with DVT in the Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (ATTRACT) randomized trial and the ClotTriever Outcomes (CLOUT) registry were included in this analysis. Both studies evaluated the effects of thrombus removal on the incidence of PTS. Patients with bilateral DVT, isolated femoral-popliteal DVT, symptom duration of >4 weeks, or incomplete case data for matching covariates were excluded. Propensity scores were used to match patients 1:1 who received AC (from ATTRACT) with those treated with mechanical thrombectomy (from CLOUT) using nearest neighbor matching on nine baseline covariates, including age, body mass index, leg treated, provoked DVT, prior venous thromboembolism, race, sex, Villalta score, and symptom duration. Clinical outcomes, including Villalta score and PTS, were assessed. Logistic regression was used to estimate the likelihood of developing PTS at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 164 pairs were matched, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics after matching. There were fewer patients with any PTS at 6 months (19% vs 46%; P < .001) and 12 months (17% vs 38%; P < .001) in the MT treatment group. Modeling revealed that, after adjusting for baseline Villalta scores, patients treated with AC had significantly higher odds of developing any PTS (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-6.2; P = .002) or moderate to severe PTS (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-8.4; P = .027) at 12 months compared with those treated with MT. Mean Villalta scores were lower through 12 months among those receiving MT vs AC (3.3 vs 6.3 at 30 days, 2.5 vs 5.5 at 6 months, and 2.6 vs 4.9 at 12 months; P < .001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: MT treatment of iliofemoral DVT was associated with significantly lower Villalta scores and a lower incidence of PTS through 12 months compared with treatment using AC. Results from currently enrolling clinical trials will further clarify the role of these therapies in the prevention of PTS after an acute DVT event.

Endovascular treatment of chronic ilio-femoral vein obstruction with extension below the inguinal ligament in patients with post-thrombotic syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate postoperative outcomes of patients with chronic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) who underwent endovascular recanalization and stenting across the inguinal ligament. METHODS: All consecutive patients with chronic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction and PTS were included in the analysis, from January 2018 and February 2022. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. Primary endpoints analyzed were major adverse events (MAEs) at 30 days and primary patency rate at 2 years of follow-up. Secondary endpoints assessed were secondary patency rate, target vessel revascularization, and clinical improvement evaluated with the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) classification, Villalta scale, and visual analog scale (VAS), respectively. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients (mean age, 48.1 ± 15.5 years; female, 61.9%) were evaluated. No intraoperative and 30-day postoperative complications were documented. The technical success rate was achieved at 100%. Overall, one in-stent occlusion and five in-stent restenosis were detected during follow-up. The primary patency rate was 93.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.8%-99.9%) and 92.1% (95% CI, 85.6%-99%), at 1- and 2-year follow-up, respectively (Kaplan-Meier analysis). Target vessel revascularization was conducted in two cases, resulting in a secondary patency of 98.4% (95% CI, 95.4%-100%) at 2 years of follow-up. Stent fracture and/or migration were not observed during follow-up. A significant clinical improvement in the patient's quality of life was documented. The median improvement of VCSS and Villalta scores were 4 (interquartile range, 2-7; P = .001), and 3 (interquartile range, 1.5-5; P = .001) vs baseline at the last follow-up. Overall, pain reduction of 17 mm on the VAS scale was documented at 2 years of follow-up. At multivariate analysis, presence of trabeculation into the femoral vein and deep femoral vein (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% CI, 0.15-6.11; P = .043), and Villalta scale >15 points at admission (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% CI, 0.15-6.11; P = .043) were predictive for in-stent occlusion during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a dedicated venous stent across the inguinal ligament was safe and effective for the treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous disease with acceptable primary and secondary patency rates at 2 years of follow-up.

Compression Therapy in Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Lower Limb and for the Prevention of Post-Thrombotic Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: After an acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limb, 20% to 63% of patients develop post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). In this review, we address the efficacy of compression therapy in the treatment of acute DVT of the lower limb, and for the prevention of PTS. METHODS: 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one meta-analysis, with a total of 3751 patients, were identified in a structured literature search. RESULTS: Two RCTs showed that adding compression therapy to drug treatment in the first 9 days of the acute phase of lower limb DVT led to more rapid pain relief (p<0.050) and less swelling (remaining difference in circumference, 1 cm versus 3 cm, p<0.050). As for the prevention of PTS, four RCTs showed a short-term benefit or no benefit of compression therapy. In three further RCTs, medical compression stockings (MCS) brought about a 16% to 27% absolute reduction of the frequency and severity of PTS (47% vs. 20 %, p<0.001; 40% vs. 21% (95% confidence intervals [29.9; 50.1] and [12.7; 29.5], respectively; and 58% vs. 42%, relative risk [RR] 0.73 [0,55; 0.96]). The benefit of MCS was also confirmed in a recent meta-analysis (RR 0.66 [0.44; 0.99], I2 = 88%). Thigh-length MCS were not superior to knee-length MCS for the prevention of PTS (33% vs. 36%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.93 [0.62; 1.41]). Individual, symptomoriented tailoring of the duration of treatment was not inferior to a fixed treatment duration of 24 months (29% vs. 28%; odds ratio [OR] 1.06 [0.78;1.44]). CONCLUSION: Compression therapy relieves symptoms in acute DVT and lessens the frequency and severity of PTS. It is therefore recommended as standard treatment.

Randomized controlled trials of interventions for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), notably deep venous thrombosis (DVT), represents a significant cardiovascular disease with high morbidity from post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Recent advancements in early thrombus removal technologies have prompted randomized controlled trials (RCT) to assess their efficacy and safety, particularly for iliofemoral DVT (IF-DVT), which carries the greatest risk of developing PTS. This narrative review summarizes these trials and introduces upcoming innovations to evaluate acute intervention for IF-DVT. Specific technologies discussed include catheter-directed thrombolysis, pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis, ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis, and non-lytic mechanical thrombectomy. This review underscores the importance of patient selection, with those presenting with extensive, symptomatic IF-DVT likely to benefit most.

Principles of Optimal Antithrombotic Therapy for Iliac VEnous Stenting (POATIVES): A national expert-based Delphi consensus study.

OBJECTIVE: Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing venous stents has not yet reached consensus, and there are not any recommendations from published guidelines. We undertook a Delphi consensus from Chinese experts to develop recommendations regarding the preferred antithrombotic therapy in patients following venous stenting. METHODS: The phase 1 questionnaire was comprised of three clinical scenarios of venous stenting for non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVL), acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and was sent to venous practitioners across China. In phase 2, the results of phase 1 were distributed to a panel of experts for evaluation along with a questionnaire encompassing a series of statements produced during phase 1. A modified Delphi method was used to reach consensus on recommendations through two rounds of surveys. RESULTS: The phase 1 questionnaire was completed by 283 respondents. In phase 2, an expert panel consisting of 28 vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists was assembled and voted 17 statements relating to antithrombotic management after venous stenting for NIVL (4 statements), DVT (6 statements), and PTS (7 statements). The majority of the statements about the antithrombotic agent selection received a high consensus strength. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the national Delphi consensus of Chinese experts regarding antithrombotic therapy following iliac venous stenting in three common scenarios, most of the statements could be used to guide antithrombotic management following venous stenting. Further studies are required to clarify controversial issues including the dose and duration of anticoagulants, the role of antiplatelet agents, especially in patients with NIVL.

Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus AngioJet pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of pharmacomechanical thrombolysis and thrombectomy (PCDT) plus catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) vs CDT alone for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and summarize the clinical experience, safety outcomes, and short- and long-term efficacy. METHODS: We performed a 4-year retrospective, case-control study. A total of 95 consecutive patients with acute symptomatic iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with a symptom duration of ≤7 days involving the iliac and/or common femoral veins underwent endovascular interventions. The patients were divided into two groups according to their clinical indications: PCDT plus CDT vs CDT alone. Statistical analyses were used to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes between the two groups. Additionally, the patients were followed up for 3 to 36 months after treatment, and the proportions of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and moderate to severe PTS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival method. RESULTS: A total of 95 consecutive patients were analyzed in this retrospective study, of whom, 51 underwent CDT alone and 44 underwent PCDT plus CDT. Between the two groups, in terms of immediate-term efficacy and safety, significant differences were found in the catheter retention time (60.64 ± 12.04 hours vs 19.42 ± 4.04 hours; P < .001), dosages of urokinase required (5.82 ± 0.81 million units vs 1.80 ± 0.64 million units; P < .001), the detumescence rate at 24 hours postoperatively (48.46% ± 8.62% vs 76.79% ± 7.98%; P = .026), the descent velocity of D-dimer per day (2266.28 ± 1358.26 µg/L/D vs 3842.34 ± 2048.02 µg/L/D; P = .018), total hospitalization stay (6.2 ± 1.40 days vs 3.8 ± 0.70 days; P = .024), number of postoperative angiograms (2.4 ± 0.80 vs 1.2 ± 0.30; P = .042), and grade III venous patency (>95% lysis: 54.5% vs 68.6%; P = .047). Furthermore, during the follow-up period, significant differences were found in the incidence of PTS (Villalta scale ≥5 or a venous ulcer: 47.0% vs 27.7%; P = .037), and the incidence proportion of moderate to severe PTS at 12 months (15.7% vs 4.5%; P = .024) and 24 months (35.3% vs 11.4%; P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CDT alone, in the iliofemoral DVT subgroup with a symptom duration of ≤7 days, PCDT plus CDT could significantly relieve early leg symptoms, shorten the hospitalization stay, reduce bleeding complications, promote long-term venous patency, and decrease the occurrence of PTS and the incidence proportion of moderate to severe PTS. Thus, the short- and long-term outcomes both support the superiority of PCDT plus CDT vs CDT in this subgroup.