Development of a New Dry Powder Aerosol Synthetic Lung Surfactant Product for Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) - Part II: In vivo Efficacy Testing in a Rabbit Surfactant Washout Model.

PURPOSE: Surfactant therapy incorporates liquid bolus instillation via endotracheal tube catheter and a mechanical ventilator in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Aerosolized surfactants have generated interest and conflicting data on the efficacy of phospholipid (PL) dose requirements. We developed and characterized a synthetic lung surfactant excipient enhanced growth (SLS-EEG) dry powder aerosol product. In this study, we compare the in vivo performance of the new aerosol product with standard-of-care liquid instillation. METHODS: Juvenile rabbits were sedated, anesthetized, intubated, and ventilated. Endogenous surfactant was depleted via whole lung lavage. Animals received either a standard dose of liquid Curosurf (200 mg PL/kg) instilled via a tracheal catheter, SLS-EEG powder aerosol (60 mg device loaded dose; equivalent to 24 mg PL/kg), or sham control. Gas exchange, lung compliance, and indices of disease severity were recorded every 30 min for 3.5 h and macro- and microscopy images were acquired at necropsy. RESULTS: While aerosol was administered at an approximately tenfold lower PL dose, both liquid-instilled and aerosol groups had similar, nearly complete recoveries of arterial oxygenation (PaO2; 96-100% recovery) and oxygenation index, and the aerosol group had superior recovery of compliance (P < 0.05). The SLS-EEG aerosol group showed less lung tissue injury, greater uniformity in lung aeration, and more homogenous surfactant distribution at the alveolar surfaces compared with liquid Curosurf. CONCLUSIONS: The new dry powder aerosol SLS product (which includes the delivery strategy, formulation, and delivery system) has the potential to be a safe, effective, and economical alternative to the current clinical standard of liquid bolus surfactant instillation.

Lung Recruitment Before Surfactant Administration in Extremely Preterm Neonates: 2-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: A multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) showed a lung recruitment maneuver using high-frequency oscillatory ventilation just before surfactant administration (ie, intubate-recruit-surfactant-extubate [IN-REC-SUR-E]) improved the efficacy of treatment compared with the standard intubate-surfactant-extubate (IN-SUR-E) technique without increasing the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Objective: To examine follow-up outcomes at corrected postnatal age (cPNA) 2 years of preterm infants previously enrolled in an RCT and treated with IN-REC-SUR-E or IN-SUR-E in 35 tertiary neonatal intensive care units. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a follow-up study of infants recruited into the primary RCT from 2015 to 2018 at 35 tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Italy. Follow-up examinations included neurodevelopmental, growth, and respiratory outcomes of these children at cPNA 2 years. Participants included spontaneously breathing extremely preterm neonates (24 0/7 to 27 6/7 weeks' gestation) reaching failure criteria for continuous positive airway pressure within the first 24 hours of life. Data were analyzed from April 2023 to January 2024. Intervention: Infants were randomly assigned (1:1) to IN-REC-SUR-E or IN-SUR-E and then followed up. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the occurrence of death after discharge or major disability at cPNA 2 years. Secondary outcomes were neurodevelopmental outcomes (major disability, cerebral palsy, cognitive impairment, visual deficit, or auditory deficit), anthropometric measurements (weight, length, and head circumference), and recurrent respiratory infections and hospitalizations because of respiratory causes at 2y cPNA. Results: A total of 137 extremely preterm infants (median [IQR] gestational age, 26.5 [25.3-27.5] weeks and 75 [54.7%] female), initially enrolled in the original RCT, were followed up at cPNA 2 years, including 64 infants in the IN-SUR-E group and 73 infants in the IN-REC-SUR-E group. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of death after discharge or major disability at cPNA 2 years (IN-SUR-E: 13 children [20.3%] vs IN-REC-SUR-E: 10 children [13.7%]; P = .36). There were no significant differences in incidence of disability, cerebral palsy, or cognitive impairment in the IN-REC-SUR-E group compared with the IN-SUR-E group. There were no significant differences in anthropometric measurements (weight, length, and head circumference) between groups. There were no significant differences in the incidence of recurrent respiratory infections or in hospitalizations because of respiratory causes between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this RCT of lung recruitment before surfactant vs standard care there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in death, neurodevelopmental outcomes, anthropometric measurements, or recurrent respiratory infections at the 2-year follow-up. These findings can aid clinicians in decision-making for the best strategy to administer surfactant, considering long-term outcomes.

Less Invasive Surfactant Administration for Preterm Infants - State of the Art.

BACKGROUND: Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) has become the preferred method of surfactant administration for spontaneously breathing babies on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). SUMMARY: The development of LISA followed the need to combine CPAP and surfactant replacement as mainstay treatment options for respiratory distress syndrome, thereby avoided exposure to positive pressure ventilation. KEY MESSAGES: This review summarises the current knowns and unknowns of LISA including the physiological concept, its relevance for short-term and long-term outcomes and the challenges for practical implementation of LISA as part of a less invasive respiratory care bundle. Further, we provide an update of the evidence on alternatives to LISA, for example, nebulised surfactant administration, pharyngeal deposition of surfactant and delivery via supraglottic airway.

Development of a New Dry Powder Aerosol Synthetic Lung Surfactant Product for Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) - Part I: In Vitro Testing and Characterization.

PURPOSE: Improving the deep lung delivery of aerosol surfactant therapy (AST) with a dry powder formulation may enable significant reductions in dose while providing improved efficacy. The objective of Part I of this two-part study was to present the development of a new dry powder aerosol synthetic lung surfactant (SLS) product and to characterize performance based on aerosol formation and realistic in vitro airway testing leading to aerosol delivery recommendations for subsequent in vivo animal model experiments. METHODS: A new micrometer-sized SLS excipient enhanced growth (EEG) dry powder formulation was produced via spray drying and aerosolized using a positive-pressure air-jet dry powder inhaler (DPI) intended for aerosol delivery directly to intubated infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) or infant-size test animals. RESULTS: The best-case design (D2) of the air-jet DPI was capable of high emitted dose (> 80% of loaded) and formed a < 2 µm mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) aerosol, but was limited to ≤ 20 mg mass loadings. Testing with a realistic in vitro rabbit model indicated that over half of the loaded dose could penetrate into the lower lung regions. Using the characterization data, a dose delivery protocol was designed in which a 60 mg total loaded dose would be administered and deliver an approximate lung dose of 14.7-17.7 mg phospholipids/kg with a total aerosol delivery period < 5 min. CONCLUSIONS: A high-efficiency aerosol SLS product was designed and tested that may enable an order of magnitude reduction in administered phospholipid dose, and provide rapid aerosol administration to infants with RDS.

Comparative biophysical study of clinical surfactants using constrained drop surfactometry.

Surfactant replacement therapy is crucial in managing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Currently licensed clinical surfactants in the United States and Europe, including Survanta, Infasurf, Curosurf, and Alveofact, are all derived from bovine or porcine sources. We conducted a comprehensive examination of the biophysical properties of these four clinical surfactant preparations under physiologically relevant conditions, using constrained drop surfactometry (CDS). The assessed biophysical properties included the adsorption rate, quasi-static and dynamic surface activity, resistance to surfactant inhibition by meconium, and the morphology of the adsorbed surfactant films. This comparative study unveiled distinct in vitro biophysical properties of these clinical surfactants and revealed correlations between their chemical composition, lateral film structure, and biophysical functionality. Notably, at 1 mg/mL, Survanta exhibited a significantly lower adsorption rate compared with the other preparations at the same surfactant concentration. At 10 mg/mL, Infasurf, Curosurf, and Survanta all demonstrated excellent dynamic surface activity, whereas Alveofact exhibited the poorest quasi-static and dynamic surface activity. The suboptimal surface activity of Alveofact is found to be correlated with its unique monolayer-predominant morphology, in contrast to other surfactants forming multilayers. Curosurf, in particular, showcased superior resistance to biophysical inhibition by meconium compared with other preparations. Understanding the diverse biophysical behaviors of clinical surfactants provides crucial insights for precision and personalized design in treating RDS and other respiratory conditions. The findings from this study contribute valuable perspectives for the development of more efficacious and fully synthetic surfactant preparations.NEW & NOTEWORTHY A thorough investigation into the biophysical properties of four animal-derived clinical surfactant preparations was conducted through constrained drop surfactometry under physiologically relevant conditions. This comparative study unveiled unique in vitro biophysical characteristics among these clinical surfactants, establishing correlations between their chemical composition, lateral film structure, and biophysical functionality. The acquired knowledge offers essential insights for the precise and personalized design of clinical surfactant for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome and other respiratory conditions.

Curosurf surfactant application on preterm babies with respiratory complications-health-economic benefits.

Background: The implementation of surfactant for respiratory syndrome approbates the therapy as a revolutionary method in intensive neonatal therapy and respiratory resuscitation. It is important to investigate the costs of this treatment. Objective: The aim of the study is to analyze the data by the application of the surfactant Curosurf to preterm babies with respiratory complications and describe the treatment costs, healthcare resource utilization and evaluate economic benefits of surfactant use in the treatment of neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and hyaline-membrane disease (HDM). Methods: A retrospective survey was performed covering 167 babies based on respiratory complications due to preterm birth and the necessity to apply a surfactant therapy. A documentary method was implemented and for each patient, an individual research protocol was filled out - a questionnaire created specifically for the purposes of the study. Results and discussion: An analysis of the data from the application of CUROSURF was made and the obtained therapeutic results were compared to expenditures for the therapy, short-term therapeutic effect, benefits and consequences of the therapy of preterm newborns with respiratory complications. The application of CUROSURF to babies with RDS resulted in the realization of net savings due to the elimination of the necessity of conducting several diagnostic and therapeutic procedures as well as their duration reduction of hospital stay, thus defining its health-economic benefits. Conclusions: The models of evaluation of cost effectiveness reveal that the medicinal product is expensive but effective from the aspect of short-term therapeutic results.

Comparison of porcine versus bovine surfactant in preterm respiratory distress syndrome: Evidence from real-world data. A multicentre collaboration from Karnataka.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Porcine surfactant (200 mg/kg initial dose) seems to be superior to bovine surfactants (100 mg/kg) in respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). There is limited data on the choice of surfactant from the developing world. Logically, using higher doses of porcine surfactant comes with an additional cost burden. We decided to evaluate the clinical effects of different types of surfactants. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted from August 2019 to December 2022 in six tertiary centers. Neonates 24-34 weeks of gestation with RDS requiring either porcine (200 mg/kg) or bovine surfactant (100 mg/kg) were enrolled. The proportion of BPD, redosing, and other morbidities in either group were analyzed. The outcomes in preterm ≥28 and <28 weeks subgroups were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 1149 eligible babies, 302 (26%) received surfactant after stabilization with CPAP. One hundred fifty-eight received porcine, and 144 received bovine surfactant. There was a higher BPD in porcine compared to the bovine group on univariate analysis [24 (15%) vs. 6 (4%); OR: 4; 95% CI: 1.6-10; p = 0.002]. On logistic regression, the gestational age and PDA requiring treatment were independent predictors of BPD, and the type of surfactant and centres did not influence BPD. Redosing [27 (17%) vs. 18 (12%), OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 0.7-2.7; p = 0.2] was not different between both surfactant types. Other morbidities like mortality, air leaks, invasive ventilation, and CPAP duration were also not different between the groups. CONCLUSION: We could not find a difference in the outcomes of BPD and redosing using porcine surfactant at 200 mg/kg compared to bovine surfactant. Considering the cost burden in the developing world, efficacy needs to be evaluated in randomized clinical trials.

Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) Versus INSURE Method in Preterm Infants: a Retrospective Study.

Background: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Early nasal CPAP and selective administration of surfactant via the endotracheal tube are widely used in the treatment of RDS in preterm infants. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation after surfactant delivery between LISA-treated and INSURE-treated premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Methods: Retrospective registry-based cohort study enrolled 36 newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of the "Santa Maria" Hospital of Terni between 2016 and 2023. As a primary outcome, we followed the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of life, while the secondary outcomes were major neonatal morbidities and death before discharge. Results: The LISA group and the INSURE group included 13 and 23 newborns respectively. Demographic features showed no significant differences between the two groups. The need for mechanical ventilation in the first 72 hours of life was similar in both groups (p >0.99). There were no significant differences in morbidities. Conclusion: LISA and INSURE are equally effective modalities for surfactant administration for the treatment of RDS in preterm infants.

Cardiovascular outcomes 50 years after antenatal exposure to betamethasone: Follow-up of a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Antenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality, but there is limited evidence regarding their effects on long-term health. This study assessed cardiovascular outcomes at 50 years after antenatal exposure to corticosteroids. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We assessed the adult offspring of women who participated in the first randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of antenatal betamethasone for the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (1969 to 1974). The first 717 mothers received 2 intramuscular injections of 12 mg betamethasone or placebo 24 h apart and the subsequent 398 received 2 injections of 24 mg betamethasone or equivalent volume of placebo. Follow-up included a health questionnaire and consent to access administrative data sources. The co-primary outcomes were the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (any of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, gestational diabetes mellitus, or prediabetes) and age at first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation, stroke, admission for peripheral vascular disease, and admission for heart failure). Analyses were adjusted for gestational age at entry, sex, and clustering. Of 1,218 infants born to 1,115 mothers, we followed up 424 (46% of survivors; 212 [50%] female) at mean (standard deviation) age 49.3 (1.0) years. There were no differences between those exposed to betamethasone or placebo for cardiovascular risk factors (159/229 [69.4%] versus 131/195 [67.2%]; adjusted relative risk 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.89, 1.18;]; p = 0.735) or age at first MACE (adjusted hazard ratio 0.58, 95% CI [0.23, 1.49]; p = 0.261). There were also no differences in the components of these composite outcomes or in any of the other secondary outcomes. Key limitations were follow-up rate and lack of in-person assessments. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that antenatal corticosteroids increase the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors or incidence of cardiovascular events up to 50 years of age. Established benefits of antenatal corticosteroids are not outweighed by an increase in adult cardiovascular disease.

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation during less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants: An open-label randomized controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately half of very preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) fail treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and need mechanical ventilation (MV). OBJECTIVES: Our aim with this study was to evaluate if nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) during less invasive surfactant treatment (LISA) can improve respiratory outcome compared with NCPAP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out an open-label randomized controlled trial at tertiary neonatal intensive care units in which infants with RDS born at 25+0-31+6 weeks of gestation between December 1, 2020 and October 31, 2022 were supported with NCPAP before and after surfactant administration and received NIPPV or NCPAP during LISA. The primary endpoint was the need for a second dose of surfactant or MV in the first 72 h of life. Other endpoints were need and duration of invasive and noninvasive respiratory supports, changes in SpO2/FiO2 ratio after LISA, and adverse effect rate. RESULTS: We enrolled 101 infants in the NIPPV group and 99 in the NCPAP group. The unadjusted odds ratio for the composite primary outcome was 0.873 (95% confidence interval: 0.456-1.671; p = .681). We found that the SpO2/FiO2 ratio was transiently higher in the LISA plus NIPPV than in the LISA plus NCPAP group, while adverse effects of LISA had similar occurrence in the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: The application of NIPPV or NCPAP during LISA in very preterm infants supported with NCPAP before and after surfactant administration had similar effects on the short-term respiratory outcome and are both safe. Our study does not support the use of NIPPV during LISA.

Use of surfactant beyond respiratory distress syndrome, what is the evidence?

Surfactant replacement therapy is currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) caused by surfactant deficiency due to immaturity. There is strong evidence that surfactant decreases mortality and air leak syndromes in premature infants with RDS. However, surfactant is also used "off-label" for respiratory failure beyond classic RDS. This review discusses current evidence for the use of off-label surfactant therapy for (1) term infants with lung disease such as meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), pneumonia/sepsis, and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (2) premature infants after 72 h for acute respiratory failure, and (3) the use of surfactant lavage. At last, we briefly describe the use of surfactants for drug delivery and the current evidence on evaluating infants for surfactant deficiency.

Creation of a rating scale to teach Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) in simulation.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training is gaining increasing prominence in neonatology training. The Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) method is starting to be taught in simulation. The aim of this educational study was to develop and validate a rating scale for teaching the LISA method in simulation. METHODS: The Downing framework was used to create this performance-rating scale. A first version of the scale was submitted to 12 French and Belgian experts to obtain their opinions. Consensus was reached using a modified Delphi method. The performance of 40 pediatricians was then evaluated with this scale on a preterm neonate manikin simulating a neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Each run was evaluated using the scale by two independent observers based on video recordings. RESULTS: The Cronbach alpha score of the rating scale was 0.72. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.91 and the scores between raters were not significantly different. Finally, this rating scale correctly distinguished the experienced from the inexperienced learners (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This rating scale is one of the first rating scales for the evaluation and teaching of the LISA method in simulation. This tool has ample potential for use in clinical practice to evaluate the performance of surfactant administration in preterm neonates.

A clinical study evaluating the combination of LISA and SNIPPV for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants.

To compare the therapeutic effect of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) followed by synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) and traditional intubate-Surfactant-Extubate (InSurE) strategy for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS). A single-center, non-randomized and single- blinded study Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit 89 infants enrolled were preterm with gestational age < 366/7 weeks and clinically diagnosed with neonatal RDS (NRDS) Interventions: 32 infants were assigned to the LISA + SNIPPV group and 57 infants to the InSurE + nCPAP group. No statistically significant differences were noted in the baseline characteristics of the enrolled infants. A lower proportion of infants developed BPD in the LISA + SNIPPV group compared to the InSurE + CPAP group [10 (31.25%) vs. 21 (36.84%), P > 0.05]; however, there was no statistically significant difference. The number needed to treat (NNT) with LISA + SNIPPV to prevent BPD development is 18. The mortality rate was not significant between our study arms [1 (3.13%) vs 2 (3.51%), P > 0.05]. There were no statistically significant differences in the durations (days) of MV [(12.18 ± 13.89) vs. (11.35 ± 11.61), P > 0.05], oxygen therapy [(35.03 ± 19.13) vs. (39.75 ± 17.91), P > 0.05] and re-intubation rates [(0.19 ± 0.40) vs. (0.21 ± 0.45), P > 0.05] between the two study groups. In terms of complications, the incidence of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) [24 (75.00%) vs. 27 (47.37%), P < 0.05] was higher and a lower rate of disturbed liver function [1 (3.23%) vs. 19 (33.33%), P < 0.05] were observed in the LISA + SNIPPV group. Acid-base imbalances were reportedly significantly higher in the InSurE group (P < 0.05). No significant differences in other complications were noted. In the interventional group, FiO2 requirements were significantly lower up until the 3rd week of treatment [FiO2 at day 0, (30.75 ± 4.78) vs. (34.66 ± 9.83), P < 0.05; FiO2 at day 21, (25.32 ± 3.74) vs. (29.11 ± 8.17), P < 0.05], as was RSS on days 2 [(0.77 ± 0.38) vs. (1.94 ± 0.75), P < 0.05] and 3 [(0.66 ± 0.33) vs. (1.89 ± 0.82), P < 0.05] after treatment. Additionally, infants in the standard group had a significantly prolonged hospital stay (days) [(45.97 ± 16.93) vs. (54.40 ± 16.26), P < 0.05]. The combination of LISA and SNIPPV for NRDS can potentially lower the rate of BPD, FiO2 demand and shorten the length of hospitalization.

Less Invasive Surfactant Administration: A Viewpoint.

The standard of care in treating respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants is respiratory support with nasal continuous positive airway pressure or a combination of continuous positive airway pressure and exogenous surfactant replacement. Endotracheal intubation, the conventional method for surfactant administration, is an invasive procedure associated with procedural and mechanical ventilation complications. The INSURE (intubation, surfactant administration, and extubation soon after) technique is an accepted method aimed at reducing the short-term complications and long-term morbidities related to mechanical ventilation but does not eliminate risks associated with endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Alternative methods of surfactant delivery that can overcome the problems associated with the INSURE technique are surfactant through a laryngeal mask, surfactant through a thin intratracheal catheter, and aerosolized surfactant delivered using nebulizers. The three alternative methods of surfactant delivery studied in the last two decades have advantages and limitations. More than a dozen randomized controlled trials have aimed to study the benefits of the three alternative techniques of surfactant delivery compared with INSURE as the control arm, with promising results in terms of reduction in mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The need to find a less invasive surfactant administration technique is a clinically relevant problem. Before broader adoption in routine clinical practice, the most beneficial technique among the three alternative strategies should be identified. This review aims to summarize the current evidence for using the three alternative techniques of surfactant administration in neonates, compare the three techniques, highlight the knowledge gaps, and suggest future directions. KEY POINTS: · The need to find a less invasive alternative method of surfactant delivery is a clinically relevant problem.. · Clinical trials that have studied alternative surfactant delivery methods have shown promising results but are inconclusive for broader adoption into clinical practice.. · Future studies should explore novel clinical trial methodologies and select clinically significant long term outcomes for comparison..

Prophylactic Oropharyngeal Surfactant for Preterm Newborns at Birth: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Preterm newborns at risk of respiratory distress syndrome are supported with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Many newborns worsen despite CPAP and are intubated for surfactant administration, an effective therapy for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome. Endotracheal intubation is associated with adverse effects. Pharyngeal administration of surfactant to preterm animals and humans has been reported as an alternative. Objective: To assess whether giving prophylactic oropharyngeal surfactant to preterm newborns at birth would reduce the rate of intubation for respiratory failure. Design, Setting, and Participants: This unblinded, parallel-group randomized clinical trial (Prophylactic Oropharyngeal Surfactant for Preterm Infants [POPART]) was conducted from December 17, 2017, to September 11, 2020, at 9 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in 6 European countries. Newborns born before 29 weeks of gestation without severe congenital anomalies, for whom intensive care was planned, were eligible for inclusion. The data were analyzed from July 27, 2022, to June 20, 2023. Intervention: Newborns were randomly assigned to receive oropharyngeal surfactant at birth in addition to CPAP or CPAP alone. Randomization was stratified by center and gestational age (GA). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was intubation in the delivery room for bradycardia and/or apnea or in the neonatal intensive care unit for prespecified respiratory failure criteria within 120 hours of birth. Caregivers were not masked to group assignment. Results: Among 251 participants (mean [SD] GA, 26 [1.5] weeks) who were well matched at study entry, 126 (69 [54.8%] male) with a mean (SD) birth weight of 858 (261) grams were assigned to the oropharyngeal surfactant group, and 125 (63 [50.4%] male) with a mean (SD) birth weight of 829 (253) grams were assigned to the control group. The proportion of newborns intubated within 120 hours was not different between the groups (80 [63.5%) in the oropharyngeal surfactant group and 81 [64.8%] in the control group; relative risk, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.81-1.18]). More newborns assigned to the oropharyngeal surfactant group were diagnosed with and treated for pneumothorax (21 [16.6%] vs 8 [6.4%]; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that administration of prophylactic oropharyngeal surfactant to newborns born before 29 weeks' GA did not reduce the rate of intubation in the first 120 hours of life. These findings suggest that administration of surfactant into the oropharynx immediately after birth in addition to CPAP should not be routinely used. Trial Registration: EudraCT: 2016-004198-41.

Surfactant for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in very low birth weight infants at a level 2 hospital: A descriptive retrospective cohort study - safety and efficacy.

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is common and is a leading cause of death in pre-term infants. The purpose of our study is to describe the demographics and incidence of adverse events in very low birth weight (VLBW) pre-term infants with RDS treated with surfactant at George, a level 2 Hospital in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. This was a retrospective observational study. We conducted an electronic folder review of infants with a birth weight of 800-1200 g treated during the study period 2017-2019 at George Regional Hospital. Outborn infants and those with congenital abnormalities were excluded. The total number of patients included in the study was 66. The mortality rate was 25.8% (17/66). The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia was 6% (4/66). Our study showed that the outcomes of VLBW infants treated with surfactant at level 2 hospitals are comparable to South African central hospitals.

External Validation of a Multivariate Model for Targeted Surfactant Replacement.

INTRODUCTION: Early targeted surfactant therapy for preterm infants is recommended but the best criteria to personalize treatment are unclear. We validate a previously published multivariate prognostic model based on gestational age (GA), lung ultrasound score (LUS), and oxygen saturation to inspire oxygen fraction ratio (SatO2/FiO2) using an independent data set. METHODS: Pragmatic, observational study in 10 Italian and Spanish NICUs, including preterm babies (250 and 336 weeks divided into 3 GA intervals) with clinical signs of respiratory distress syndrome and stabilized on CPAP. LUS and SatO2/FiO2 were collected soon after stabilization. Their prognostic accuracy was evaluated on the subsequent surfactant administration by a rigorously masked physician. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-five infants were included in the study. Surfactant was given to 74% infants born at 25-27 weeks, 38.5% at 28-30 weeks, and 26.5% at 31-33 weeks. The calibration curve comparing the validation and the development populations showed significant overlap with an intercept = 0.08, 95% CI (-0.34; 0.5) and a slope = 1.53, 95% CI (1.07-1.98). The validation cohort had a high predictive accuracy. Its ROC curve showed an AUC = 0.95, 95% CI (0.91-0.99) with sensitivity = 0.93, 95% CI (0.83-0.98), specificity = 0.81, 95% CI (0.73-0.88), PPV = 0.76, 95% CI (0.65-0.84), NPV = 0.95, 95% CI (0.88-0.98). LUS ≥9 demonstrated the highest sensitivity (0.91, 95% CI [0.82-0.97]) and specificity = 0.81, 95% CI (0.72-0.88) as individual predictor. LUS and SatO2/FiO2 prognostic performances varied with GA. CONCLUSION: We validated a prognostic model based on LUS and Sat/FiO2 to facilitate early, customized surfactant administration that may improve respiratory management of preterm neonates.