Deep brain stimulation for Tourette's syndrome.

Tourette's syndrome is a neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by formidable motor and vocal tics. Many individuals also present with comorbid neuropsychiatric conditions. Though patients often benefit from pharmacological and behavioral therapies, a subset of individuals develop severe, treatment-resistant symptoms that might necessitate more invasive interventions, such as Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). DBS, particularly targeting regions like the globus pallidus internus (GPi) and the centromedian-parafascicular complex (CM-Pf) of the thalamus, has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing tic severity and improving quality of life. This review outlines the mechanism, clinical efficacy, and long-term outcome of DBS in TS. Results from clinical studies reveal significant reductions in tics. However, success with DBS is variable depending on a number of factors, including target selection and electrode placement. The use of DBS has ethical considerations, which include risks to the surgical procedure, the need for full and complete informed consent, and questions about the implications of such treatment on cognitive and emotional growth. Long-term follow-up will be required to ensure appropriate patient outcomes and complication management. Additional research and ethical debate will be needed with advancing DBS technology to ensure responsible and equitable treatment. This paper narratively summarizes the surgical options available for TS, with a focus on the current status of DBS in the management of the disease.

Tourette syndrome research highlights from 2023.

In this, the tenth annual update for the F1000Research Tics collection, we summarize research reports from 2023 on Gilles de la Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders. The authors welcome article suggestions and thoughtful feedback from readers.

Deep brain stimulation for Tourette's syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the efficacy and harm of deep brain stimulation for motor symptoms, with psychiatric and behavioural comorbidities, either individually or in combination, in adults and adolescents with Tourette's syndrome compared to placebo, sham intervention, or the best available behavioural and pharmacological treatment.

Surgical Concepts and Long-term Outcomes of Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Severe Tourette Syndrome: A Single-center Experience.

Tourette syndrome (TS) is a developmental neuropsychiatric disorder that is characterized by tic movements. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) may be a treatment option for severe cases refractory to medical and behavioral therapies. In this study, we reviewed the surgical techniques used for DBS in patients with severe TS and its clinical outcomes and sought to determine the optimal surgical procedure and current issues based on our experience and the literature. A total of 14 patients, consisting of 13 men and 1 woman, who underwent centromedian thalamic DBS and were followed up for a mean duration of 2.3 ± 1.0 years, participated in this study. The mean Yale Global Tic Severity Scale severity score significantly improved from 41.4 ± 7.0 at baseline to 19.8 ± 11.4 at 6 months (P = 0.01) and 12.7 ± 6.2 at the last follow-up (P < 0.01). Moreover, the mean Yale Global Tic Severity Scale impairment score significantly improved from 47.1 ± 4.7 at baseline to 23.1 ± 11.1 at 6 months (P < 0.01) and 7.6 ± 2.9 at the last follow-up (P < 0.01). However, there were problems with continuous postoperative monitoring (three cases were lost to follow-up) and surgery-related adverse events, including one case each of lead misplacement and a delayed intracerebral hemorrhage due to severe self-injurious tics. This study aimed to highlight not only the clinical efficacy of DBS for TS but also its challenges. Clinicians should understand the three-dimensional brain anatomy so that they can perform precise surgical procedures, avoid adverse events, and achieve favorable outcomes of DBS for TS.

Tourette Syndrome: A Catalyst for Operationalizing Neurodiversity.

Our goal, taking Tourette syndrome as a case example, is to introduce neurologists to, and motivate discussion on, the neurodiversity paradigm. This philosophical construct considers some neurologic conditions in diversity, instead of simply disease. Moving from philosophical idea to empirical construct draws from patient and family perspectives on (1) quality of life and discrimination, (2) disability pride, and (3) unique profiles of different patient cohorts. Listening to patient voices, attending to family, advocacy group, and societal views on neurologic disorders can strengthen precision neurology practice. Dialogs on neurodiversity, including antitherapy sentiments, offer to enhance neurologic care, patient agency, and autonomy; encourage respectful communications with patients who challenge the idea their condition is pathologic; and to set the stage for future empirical investigations and practice guidelines.

White matter alterations predict outcomes of comprehensive behavioral intervention for tics in children with Tourette syndrome: A diffusion MRI study.

AIM: Tourette syndrome (TS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that cause sudden uncontrolled rapid and repeated vocal sounds or movements called tics. Herein, diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) connectometry was implemented to evaluate the white matter connectivity differences among TS patients. METHODS: A total of 63 TS and 77 typically developed (TD) individuals were enrolled in the present study. dMRI connectometry was utilized to identify differences in connectivity patterns of white matter tracts in TS patients based on quantitative anisotropy (QA). QA was compared between TS and TD patients and correlated with severity scores such as Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) and Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (PUTS). RESULTS: Higher white matter connectivity of corpus callosum and bilateral cingulum as well as lower connectivity of corticothalamic and corticostriatal pathways were evident in TS relative to TD. The baseline YGTSS motor, YGTSS total, and PUTS were negatively correlated with corticostriatal pathway, corticothalamic pathway, and bilateral cingulum integrity, respectively. The changes in tic severity scores were also positively correlated with alterations in the white matter integrity of these brain regions following behavioral therapy. CONCLUSION: Patients with TS have several abnormalities in their white matter microstructure particularly in the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuit, correlated with the severity of the disease. Besides, the post-behavioral therapy changes in the white matter integrity of these regions are demonstrated as response predictors.

French guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Tourette syndrome.

The term "Gilles de la Tourette syndrome", or the more commonly used term "Tourette syndrome" (TS) refers to the association of motor and phonic tics which evolve in a context of variable but frequent psychiatric comorbidity. The syndrome is characterized by the association of several motor tics and at least one phonic tic that have no identifiable cause, are present for at least one year and appear before the age of 18. The presence of coprolalia is not necessary to establish or rule out the diagnosis, as it is present in only 10% of cases. The diagnosis of TS is purely clinical and is based on the symptoms defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). No additional tests are required to confirm the diagnosis of TS. However, to exclude certain differential diagnoses, further tests may be necessary. Very frequently, one or more psychiatric comorbidities are also present, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, anxiety, explosive outbursts, self-injurious behaviors, learning disorders or autism spectrum disorder. The condition begins in childhood around 6 or 7 years of age and progresses gradually, with periods of relative waxing and waning of tics. The majority of patients experience improvement by the end of the second decade of life, but symptoms may persist into adulthood in around one-third of patients. The cause of TS is unknown, but genetic susceptibility and certain environmental factors appear to play a role. The treatment of TS and severe forms of tics is often challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach (involving the general practitioner (GP), pediatrician, psychiatrist, neurologist, school or occupational physicians, psychologist and social workers). In mild forms, education (of young patients, parents and siblings) and psychological management are usually recommended. Medical treatments, including antipsychotics, are essential in the moderate to severe forms of the disease (i.e. when there is a functional and/or psychosocial discomfort linked to tics). Over the past decade, cognitive-behavioral therapies have been validated for the treatment of tics. For certain isolated tics, botulinum toxin injections may also be useful. Psychiatric comorbidities, when present, often require a specific treatment. For very severe forms of TS, treatment by deep brain stimulation offers real therapeutic hope. If tics are suspected and social or functional impairment is significant, specialist advice should be sought, in accordance with the patient's age (psychiatrist/child psychiatrist; neurologist/pediatric neurologist). They will determine tic severity and the presence or absence of comorbidities. The GP will take over the management and prescription of treatment: encouraging treatment compliance, assessing side effects, and combating stigmatization among family and friends. They will also play an important role in rehabilitation therapies, as well as in ensuring that accommodations are made in the patient's schooling or professional environment.

Comparison of children and adults in deep brain stimulation for Tourette Syndrome: a large-scale multicenter study of 102 cases with long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising therapy for refractory Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS). However, its long-term efficacy, safety, and recommended surgical age remain controversial, requiring evidence to compare different age categories. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study recruited 102 GTS patients who underwent DBS between October 2006 and April 2022 at two national centers. Patients were divided into two age categories: children (aged < 18 years; n = 34) and adults (aged ≥ 18 years; n = 68). The longitudinal outcomes as tic symptoms were assessed by the YGTSS, and the YBOCS, BDI, and GTS-QOL were evaluated for symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), depression, and quality of life, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, these included patients who finished a median 60-month follow-up, with no significant difference between children and adults (p = 0.44). Overall, the YGTSS total score showed significant postoperative improvements and further improved with time (improved 45.2%, 51.6%, 55.5%, 55.6%, 57.8%, 61.4% after 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and ≥ 60 months of follow-up compared to baseline, respectively) in all included patients (all p < 0.05). A significantly higher improvement was revealed in children than adults at ≥ 60 months of follow-up in the YGTSS scores (70.1% vs 55.9%, p = 0.043), and the time to achieve 60% improvement was significantly shorter in the children group (median 6 months vs 12 months, p = 0.013). At the last follow-up, the mean improvements were 45.4%, 48.9%, and 55.9% and 40.3%, 45.4%, and 47.9% in YBOCS, BDI, and GTS-QOL scores for children and adults, respectively, which all significantly improved compared to baseline (all p < 0.05) but without significant differences between these two groups (all p > 0.05), and the children group received significantly higher improvement in GTS-QOL scores than adults (55.9% vs. 47.9%, p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: DBS showed acceptable long-term efficacy and safety for both children and adults with GTS. Surgeries performed for patients younger than 18 years seemed to show acceptable long-term efficacy and safety and were not associated with increased risks of loss of benefit compared to patients older than 18 at the time of surgery. However, surgeries for children should also be performed cautiously to ensure their refractoriness and safety.

Internet-Delivered Exposure and Response Prevention for Pediatric Tourette Syndrome: 12-Month Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Behavior therapy is a recommended intervention for Tourette syndrome (TS) and chronic tic disorder (CTD), but availability is limited and long-term effects are uncertain. Objective: To investigate the long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness of therapist-supported, internet-delivered exposure and response prevention (ERP) vs psychoeducation for youths with TS or CTD. Design, Setting, And Participants: This 12-month controlled follow-up of a parallel group, superiority randomized clinical trial was conducted at a research clinic in Stockholm, Sweden, with nationwide recruitment. In total, 221 participants aged 9 to 17 years with TS or CTD were enrolled between April 26, 2019, and April 9, 2021, of whom 208 (94%) provided 12-month follow-up data. Final follow-up data were collected on June 29, 2022. Outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation throughout the study. Interventions: A total of 111 participants were originally randomly allocated to 10 weeks of therapist-supported, internet-delivered ERP and 110 participants to therapist-supported, internet-delivered psychoeducation. Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary outcome was within-group change in tic severity, measured by the Total Tic Severity Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS-TTSS), from the 3-month follow-up to the 12-month follow-up. Treatment response was defined as 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale. Analyses were intention-to-treat and followed the plan prespecified in the published study protocol. A health economic evaluation was performed from 3 perspectives: health care organization (including direct costs for treatment provided in the study), health care sector (additionally including health care resource use outside of the study), and societal (additionally including costs beyond health care [eg, parent's absenteeism from work]). Results: In total, 221 participants were recruited (mean [SD] age, 12.1 [2.3] years; 152 [69%] male). According to the YGTSS-TTSS, there were no statistically significant changes in tic severity from the 3-month to the 12-month follow-up in either group (ERP coefficient, -0.52 [95% CI, -1.26 to 0.21]; P = .16; psychoeducation coefficient, 0.00 [95% CI, -0.78 to 0.78]; P > .99). A secondary analysis including all assessment points (baseline to 12-month follow-up) showed no statistically significant between-group difference in tic severity from baseline to the 12-month follow-up (coefficient, -0.38 [95% CI, -1.11 to 0.35]; P = .30). Treatment response rates were similar in both groups (55% in ERP and 50% in psychoeducation; odds ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.73-2.16]; P = .42) at the 12-month follow-up. The health economic evaluation showed that, from a health care sector perspective, ERP produced more quality-adjusted life years (0.01 [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.03]) and lower costs (adjusted mean difference -$84.48 [95% CI, -$440.20 to $977.60]) than psychoeducation at the 12-month follow-up. From the health care organization and societal perspectives, ERP produced more quality-adjusted life years at higher costs, with 65% to 78% probability of ERP being cost-effective compared with psychoeducation when using a willingness-to-pay threshold of US $79 000. Conclusions And Relevance: There were no statistically significant changes in tic severity from the 3-month through to the 12-month follow-up in either group. The ERP intervention was not superior to psychoeducation at any time point. While ERP was not superior to psychoeducation alone in reducing tic severity at the end of the follow-up period, ERP is recommended for clinical implementation due to its likely cost-effectiveness and support from previous literature. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03916055.

[Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette's Syndrome and Challenging for Neuropsychiatric Disease].

The efficacy of deep brain stimulation(DBS)for Tourette's syndrome is being well established. Herein, we performed DBS in 38 patients and confirmed that its efficacy was comparable with that reported internationally. Although many patients experience severe symptoms, the indications for surgery remain controversial. One reason for this is that Tourette syndrome has the potential for spontaneous remission, while DBS treatment results in the need for long-term management, which can be difficult for some patients. Furthermore, while several targets for DBS have been reported, no treatment guidelines have yet been established. The efficacy of DBS for neuropsychiatric disorders, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, and dementia, is gradually being reported. However, this use has many limitations in terms of expectations similar to those seen with Tourette's syndrome, leading to problems with expanding indications for these disorders. Indications for these disorders should be addressed in conjunction with ethical issues. It is expected that more data on this topic will be collected in the future.

Emerging therapies for childhood-onset movement disorders.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We highlight novel and emerging therapies in the treatment of childhood-onset movement disorders. We structured this review by therapeutic entity (small molecule drugs, RNA-targeted therapeutics, gene replacement therapy, and neuromodulation), recognizing that there are two main approaches to treatment: symptomatic (based on phenomenology) and molecular mechanism-based therapy or 'precision medicine' (which is disease-modifying). RECENT FINDINGS: We highlight reports of new small molecule drugs for Tourette syndrome, Friedreich's ataxia and Rett syndrome. We also discuss developments in gene therapy for aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency and hereditary spastic paraplegia, as well as current work exploring optimization of deep brain stimulation and lesioning with focused ultrasound. SUMMARY: Childhood-onset movement disorders have traditionally been treated symptomatically based on phenomenology, but focus has recently shifted toward targeted molecular mechanism-based therapeutics. The development of precision therapies is driven by increasing capabilities for genetic testing and a better delineation of the underlying disease mechanisms. We highlight novel and exciting approaches to the treatment of genetic childhood-onset movement disorders while also discussing general challenges in therapy development for rare diseases. We provide a framework for molecular mechanism-based treatment approaches, a summary of specific treatments for various movement disorders, and a clinical trial readiness framework.

Efficacy of deep brain stimulation for Tourette syndrome and its comorbidities: A meta-analysis.

Tourette Syndrome (TS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by multiple motor and vocal tics, often accompanied by comorbid disorders. Optional treatments for patients with TS include behavioral therapy, pharmacotherapy, and neurostimulation techniques. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been considered a therapeutic approach for refractory TS and its comorbid symptoms. However, systematic comparison is necessary to understand the therapeutic effect of DBS among patients with TS with various comorbid symptoms, demographic characteristics, or stimulation targets. Consequently, our research aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of DBS in alleviating the symptoms of TS and its comorbidities. A systematic literature search was conducted across five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO. The primary outcome was the mean change in the global score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS), which assesses the severity of tics. The secondary outcomes included mean improvement of comorbid symptoms, such as obsessive-compulsive behaviors (OCB), depression symptoms and anxiety symptoms. In total, 51 studies with 673 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the DBS led to a significant improvement in tic symptoms (p â€‹< â€‹0.001), as well as the comorbid obsessive-compulsive, depression, and anxiety symptoms with effect sizes of 1.88, 0.88, 1.04, and 0.76 accordingly. In the subgroup analysis, we found that striatum stimulation led to a more significant improvement in OCB in patients with TS compared to that observed with thalamic stimulation (p â€‹= â€‹0.017). The relationship between sex, age, and target with the improvement of tics, depression, and anxiety was not statistically significant (p â€‹= â€‹0.923, 0.438, 0.591 for different male proportions; p â€‹= â€‹0.463, 0.425, 0.105 for different age groups; p â€‹= â€‹0.619, 0.113, 0.053 for different targets). In conclusion, DBS is an efficient treatment option for TS, as well as the comorbid OCB, depression symptoms, and anxiety symptoms. It is important to highlight that stimulating the striatum is more effective in managing obsessive-compulsive symptoms compared to stimulating the thalamus.

Acupoint selection rules of acupuncture for Tourette syndrome in children. / 针刺治疗儿童Tourette综合征选穴规律.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the rules of acupoint selection and compatibility of acupuncture for Tourette syndrome(TS) in children. METHODS: The relevant literature regarding acupuncture for Tourette syndrome in children included in CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from the establishment of the database to March 31st, 2023 was retrieved.The information of acupuncture prescription, syndrome type, meridian affinity was extracted to set up database. The Microsoft Excel 2019 was used for descriptive statistical analysis, SPSS modeler18.0 was for association rule analysis, lantern5.0 was for latent structure analysis and comprehensive clustering. RESULTS: ①A total of 80 literature was included, and 112 acupuncture prescriptions were extracted, involving 104 acupoints, with a cumulative frequency of 859 times.②The acupoints with high use frequency were Taichong(LR 3), Baihui(GV 20), Fengchi(GB 20), Hegu(LI 4), Sishencong(EX-HN 1), Sanyinjiao(SP 6) and Zusanli(ST 36).③In the treatment of TS with acupuncture, the governor vessel acupoints were the most frequently used, the proportion of acupoints on the head, face, neck and lower limbs was higher. ④The association rule analysis showed that Fengchi(GB 20)-Hegu(LI 4) and Taichong(LR 3)-Hegu(LI 4) had the highest support degree, both were 47.32%.⑤Five comprehensive clustering models were obtained by analyzing the latent structure of high-frequency acupoints, corresponding to yin deficiency disturbing wind, liver hyperactivity and spleen deficiency, liver yang transforming into wind, phlegm-heat harassing the interior and qi stagnation transformed fire. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture for TS in children is based on the principle of soothe the liver and extinguish the wind, regulating qi and blood, and paying attention to regulating spirit and qi. The core acupoints are Fengchi(GB 20), Hegu(LI 4), Taichong(LR 3), Baihui(GV 20), Sanyinjiao(SP 6) , Zusanli(ST 36), acupoints should be selected according to different syndrome in clinical.

Tics emergencies and malignant tourette syndrome: Assessment and management.

Tourette syndrome (TS) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by the presence of tics, frequently accompanied by a variety of neuropsychiatric comorbidities. A subset of patients with TS present with severe and disabling symptoms, requiring prompt therapeutic intervention. Some of these manifestations may result in medical emergencies when severe motor or phonic tics lead to damage of anatomical structures closely related to the tic. Examples include myelopathy or radiculopathy following severe neck ("whiplash") jerks or a variety of self-inflicted injuries. In addition to self-aggression or, less commonly, allo-aggression, some patients exhibit highly inappropriate behavior, suicidal tendencies, and rage attacks which increase the burden of the disease and are important components of "malignant TS". This subset of TS is frequently associated with comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder. Therapeutic measures include intensive behavioral therapy, optimization of oral pharmacotherapy, botulinum toxin injections, and deep brain stimulation.

Responsive deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Tourette syndrome.

To report the results of 'responsive' deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Tourette syndrome (TS) in a National Institutes of Health funded experimental cohort. The use of 'brain derived physiology' as a method to trigger DBS devices to deliver trains of electrical stimulation is a proposed approach to address the paroxysmal motor and vocal tic symptoms which appear as part of TS. Ten subjects underwent bilateral staged DBS surgery and each was implanted with bilateral centromedian thalamic (CM) region DBS leads and bilateral M1 region cortical strips. A series of identical experiments and data collections were conducted on three groups of consecutively recruited subjects. Group 1 (n = 2) underwent acute responsive DBS using deep and superficial leads. Group 2 (n = 4) underwent chronic responsive DBS using deep and superficial leads. Group 3 (n = 4) underwent responsive DBS using only the deep leads. The primary outcome measure for each of the 8 subjects with chronic responsive DBS was calculated as the pre-operative baseline Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) motor subscore compared to the 6 month embedded responsive DBS setting. A responder for the study was defined as any subject manifesting a ≥ 30 points improvement on the YGTSS motor subscale. The videotaped Modified Rush Tic Rating Scale (MRVTRS) was a secondary outcome. Outcomes were collected at 6 months across three different device states: no stimulation, conventional open-loop stimulation, and embedded responsive stimulation. The experience programming each of the groups and the methods applied for programming were captured. There were 10 medication refractory TS subjects enrolled in the study (5 male and 5 female) and 4/8 (50%) in the chronic responsive eligible cohort met the primary outcome manifesting a reduction of the YGTSS motor scale of ≥ 30% when on responsive DBS settings. Proof of concept for the use of responsive stimulation was observed in all three groups (acute responsive, cortically triggered and deep DBS leads only). The responsive approach was safe and well tolerated. TS power spectral changes associated with tics occurred consistently in the low frequency 2-10 Hz delta-theta-low alpha oscillation range. The study highlighted the variety of programming strategies which were employed to achieve responsive DBS and those used to overcome stimulation induced artifacts. Proof of concept was also established for a single DBS lead triggering bi-hemispheric delivery of therapeutic stimulation. Responsive DBS was applied to treat TS related motor and vocal tics through the application of three different experimental paradigms. The approach was safe and effective in a subset of individuals. The use of different devices in this study was not aimed at making between device comparisons, but rather, the study was adapted to the current state of the art in technology. Overall, four of the chronic responsive eligible subjects met the primary outcome variable for clinical effectiveness. Cortical physiology was used to trigger responsive DBS when therapy was limited by stimulation induced artifacts.

A meta-analysis of transcranial magnetic stimulation in Tourette syndrome.

There is growing enthusiasm for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders using neuromodulation. While some reports claim that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to treat Tourette Syndrome (TS), little research exists to support this assertion. This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of TMS to reduce tic severity in patients with TS. Additionally, it explored the effect of TMS to reduce premonitory urge severity-the primary mechanism implicated in the frontline evidence-based treatment of TS. Five treatment comparisons were selected using PRISMA guidelines. All studies included were required to be (1) a randomized controlled trial, (2) compare TMS to a sham condition, and (3) have all participants meet diagnostic criteria for a persistent tic disorder and/or TS. A random effects model meta-analysis examined the efficacy of using TMS to reduce tic severity and explored the effect of TMS to reduce premonitory urge severity. TMS did not significantly reduce tic severity (g = 0.44; 95% CI = -0.17, 1.05; z = 1.40; p = 0.16), but a moderate reduction in premonitory urge severity was found (g = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.9, 1.17; z = 2.27; p < 0.02). Trials with larger sample sizes and a preponderance of women were found to have greater therapeutic effects of TMS for tic severity. There is limited support for the use of TMS to reduce tic severity, though reductions in premonitory urge severity were observed. Major limitations of the existing literature are examined, with a call for research investigating newer TMS protocols and their use as a treatment augmentation strategy.

Efficacy and safety of combined deep brain stimulation with capsulotomy for comorbid motor and psychiatric symptoms in Tourette's syndrome: Experience and evidence.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined deep brain stimulation (DBS) with capsulotomy for comorbid motor and psychiatric symptoms in patients with Tourette's syndrome (TS). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study consecutively enrolled TS patients with comorbid motor and psychiatric symptoms who were treated with combined DBS and anterior capsulotomy at our center. Longitudinal motor, psychiatric, and cognitive outcomes and quality of life were assessed. In addition, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to summarize the current experience with the available evidence. RESULTS: In total, 5 eligible patients in our cohort and 26 summarized patients in 6 cohorts were included. After a mean 18-month follow-up, our cohort reported that motor symptoms significantly improved by 62.4 % (P = 0.005); psychiatric symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and anxiety significantly improved by 87.7 % (P < 0.001) and 78.4 % (P = 0.009); quality of life significantly improved by 61.9 % (P = 0.011); and no significant difference was found in cognitive function (all P > 0.05). Combined surgery resulted in greater improvements in psychiatric outcomes and quality of life than DBS alone. The synthesized findings suggested significant improvements in tics (MD: 57.92, 95 % CI: 41.28-74.56, P < 0.001), OCD (MD: 21.91, 95 % CI: 18.67-25.15, P < 0.001), depression (MD: 18.32, 95 % CI: 13.26-23.38, P < 0.001), anxiety (MD: 13.83, 95 % CI: 11.90-15.76, P < 0.001), and quality of life (MD: 48.22, 95 % CI: 43.68-52.77, P < 0.001). Individual analysis revealed that the pooled treatment effects on motor symptoms, psychiatric symptoms, and quality of life were 78.6 %, 84.5-87.9 %, and 83.0 %, respectively. The overall pooled rate of adverse events was 50.0 %, and all of these adverse events were resolved or alleviated with favorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Combined DBS with capsulotomy is effective for relieving motor and psychiatric symptoms in TS patients, and its safety is acceptable. However, the optimal candidate should be considered, and additional experience is still necessary.

Treating Tourette Together: An Agenda for Patient-Centered Research Focused on Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics.

To establish a patient-centered agenda for research that will lead to effective, widespread availability, adoption, and utilization of evidence-based behavioral treatment of Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders (TDs), we planned and executed a multistage, collaborative "Treating Tourette Together" research planning project with researchers, clinicians, patients, families, and other interested parties. Priorities for future behavioral treatment research were solicited from these parties via anonymous community surveys, a 2-day research planning summit with 46 individuals representing key stakeholder groups, and community response to summit reports. Four high-priority research domains were identified: (a) expanding treatment access, (b) improving treatment outcomes, (c) optimizing treatment within a broader care model, and (d) evaluating outcomes beyond tic severity. Community-engaged participatory research models can efficiently delineate clear and actionable priorities for clinical research. This approach holds promise for improving the impact of clinical research in TDs and other neuropsychiatric disorders.