Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Neurol Res ; 39(2): 133-141, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27915586

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Complicated aortic arch plaques (CAP) and their progression are important for recurrent ischemic stroke (IS) and its prognosis. We investigated the effects and clinical benefits of rosuvastatin therapy on this pathophysiology. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether rosuvastatin prevention of aortic arch plaque progression improved the prognosis of IS patients. METHODS: Ninety-seven consecutive acute cerebral embolism patients were retrospectively surveyed. All had transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to assess the presence or absence of CAP, defined as aortic wall thickness ≥4 mm or plaque ulceration. Patients received conventional antithrombotic therapy as clinically indicated. All patients with CAP were recommended to receive 5 mg rosuvastatin/day, administered by their attending physicians; not all physicians followed this recommendation. Six-month follow-up TEEs were performed in patients with CAP who received rosuvastatin. Major adverse cerebrovascular events (MACEs) comprised recurrent IS and death. RESULTS: CAP was detected in 39 patients (40%), and MACEs in 15. Multivariate regression analysis showed that patients with CAP not taking rosuvastatin was an independent risk factor for MACEs (odds ratio = 18.044; 95% confidential interval = 2.089-155.846, p < 0.01). When patients were divided into three groups: those with CAP taking rosuvastatin, those with CAP not taking rosuvastatin, and those without CAP, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients with CAP not taking rosuvastatin had significantly more MACEs than those in the other two groups (long-rank test; χ2 = 6.553, p < 0.05). Six-month TEE follow-ups in the 26 patients with CAP taking rosuvastatin showed significant improvement in CAP diameter with improved lipid profiles; 88% (23/26 patients) showed no morphological CAP progression; 15 of these showed CAP regression. DISCUSSION: Rosuvastatin therapy prevented aortic arch plaque progression in IS patients with CAP, and may also have long-term clinical benefits.


Asunto(s)
Síndromes del Arco Aórtico/etiología , Síndromes del Arco Aórtico/prevención & control , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Rosuvastatina Cálcica/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Síndromes del Arco Aórtico/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Femenino , Humanos , Lipoproteína(a)/sangre , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...