Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy and the Use of Hormone Replacement Therapy Below the Age of Natural Menopause: Scientific Impact Paper No. 66 October 2021: Scientific Impact Paper No. 66.

This paper deals with the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after the removal of fallopian tubes and ovaries to prevent ovarian cancer in premenopausal high risk women. Some women have an alteration in their genetic code, which makes them more likely to develop ovarian cancer. Two well-known genes which can carry an alteration are the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Examples of other genes associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer include RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, PALB2 and Lynch syndrome genes. Women with a strong family history of ovarian cancer and/or breast cancer, may also be at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. Women at increased risk can choose to have an operation to remove the fallopian tubes and ovaries, which is the most effective way to prevent ovarian cancer. This is done after a woman has completed her family. However, removal of ovaries causes early menopause and leads to hot flushes, sweats, mood changes and bone thinning. It can also cause memory problems and increases the risk of heart disease. It may reduce libido or impair sexual function. Guidance on how to care for women following preventative surgery who are experiencing early menopause is needed. HRT is usually advisable for women up to 51 years of age (average age of menopause for women in the UK) who are undergoing early menopause and have not had breast cancer, to minimise the health risks linked to early menopause. For women with a womb, HRT should include estrogen coupled with progestogen to protect against thickening of the lining of the womb (called endometrial hyperplasia). For women without a womb, only estrogen is given. Research suggests that, unlike in older women, HRT for women in early menopause does not increase breast cancer risk, including in those who are BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers and have preventative surgery. For women with a history of receptor-negative breast cancer, the gynaecologist will liaise with an oncology doctor on a case-by-case basis to help to decide if HRT is safe to use. Women with a history of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer are not normally offered HRT. A range of other therapies can be used if a woman is unable to take HRT. These include behavioural therapy and non-hormonal medicines. However, these are less effective than HRT. Regular exercise, healthy lifestyle and avoiding symptom triggers are also advised. Whether to undergo surgery to reduce risk or not and its timing can be a complex decision-making process. Women need to be carefully counselled on the pros and cons of both preventative surgery and HRT use so they can make informed decisions and choices.

Vaginal NOTES approach for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: A video demonstration.

Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is an important option to prevent the development of ovarian and fallopian tube cancers in women with a BRCA1/2 mutation. Conventional laparoscopy is the current preferred technique since it is associated with less morbidity compared to laparotomy. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) is a new minimally invasive technique that allows access to the peritoneal cavity through the vagina without skin incisions. The vNOTES technique for risk-reducing BSO is presented herein. This article includes a narrated, step-by-step video demonstration of the entire procedure. Risk-reducing BSO using the vNOTES approach is a feasible technique that appears to be simple, safe, and reproducible. This technique has the potential to improve patients' surgical experience and provide good long-term functional and cosmetics outcomes. This technique needs to be further evaluated and compared to the conventional laparoscopic approach.

Surgical Management of Hereditary Breast Cancer.

The identification that breast cancer is hereditary was first described in the nineteenth century. With the identification of the BRCA1 and BRCA 2 breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in the mid-1990s and the introduction of genetic testing, significant advancements have been made in tailoring surveillance, guiding decisions on medical or surgical risk reduction and cancer treatments for genetic variant carriers. This review discusses various medical and surgical management options for hereditary breast cancers.

Practice variation in bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at benign abdominal hysterectomy: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at benign hysterectomy is not recommended in premenopausal women who are in the premenopausal stage because of its potential associations with increased all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease; however, contemporary practice patterns are unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantify between-surgeon variation in bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and identify surgeon and patient characteristics associated with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy to evaluate current quality of care and identify targets for knowledge translation and future research. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a population-based retrospective cross-sectional study of adult women (≥20 years) undergoing benign abdominal hysterectomy from 2014 to 2018 in Ontario, Canada. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression models, stratified by age group (<45, 45-54, ≥55 years), were used to model between-surgeon variation after multivariable adjustment for patient and surgeon characteristics. Cases of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were classified as potentially appropriate or potentially avoidable based on the presence or absence of diagnostic indications. RESULTS: Of 44,549 eligible women, 17,797 (39.9%) underwent concurrent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 26,752 (60.1%) did not. In all three age strata, the individual surgeon providing care was one of the strongest factors influencing whether patients received bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (median odds ratio, 2.00-2.53). Surgeons accounted for more than 22% of the residual observed variation in bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women aged 45-54 years compared with 16% and 14% of the residual observed variation in bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women aged <45 and ≥55 years, respectively. Non-gynecologic patient factors, such as obesity (odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.52; P<.001) and residing in low-income regions (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.55; P<.001), were also associated with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Approximately 40% of patients who underwent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy had no indication for the procedure in their discharge records. CONCLUSION: Marked between-surgeon variation in bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy rates, even after adjusting for patient case mix, suggests ongoing uncertainty in practice. Stronger evidence-based guidelines on the risks and benefits of salpingo-oophorectomy as women age are needed, particularly focusing on perimenopausal women.

Transvaginal salpingo-oophorectomy with gasless laparoscopy - an optional pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the appropriate technique for salpingo-oophorectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), under gasless laparoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients with clinical indication underwent gasless laparoscopic transvaginal salpingo-oophorectomy with concurrent vaginal hysterectomy. An abdominal-wall lifting device was used after removal of the uterus, and the adnexa was removed trans-vaginally by gasless laparoscopy. The perioperative clinical data, such as operative duration, volume of blood loss, morbidity, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully done, without any intraoperative or major postoperative complications, and no additional transabdominal ports were required. The salpingo-oophorectomy part of the procedure was completed in approximately 11-40 minutes, with minimal blood loss. All of the patients were discharged, scar-free, 2-4 days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal NOTES with gasless laparoscopy is a feasible and safe surgical technique in cases involving difficult vaginal salpingo-oophorectomy, which avoids conversion to an abdominal route.

Risk-reducing Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy: Assessing the Incidence of Occult Ovarian Cancer and Surgeon Adherence to Recommended Practices.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the incidence of ovarian cancer diagnosed at the time of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in a large cohort of patients with a BRCA mutation. In addition, we aimed to determine the adherence to the recommended practices for performing a risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy as described by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. We sought to determine if adherence differed by the type of training (i.e., gynecologic oncologists vs benign gynecologists). DESIGN: Descriptive, retrospective analysis. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Two hundred sixty-nine patients with a known BRCA mutation. INTERVENTIONS: Prophylactic risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed either by a gynecologic oncologist or a benign gynecologist between July 2007 and September 2018. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 269 patients who underwent risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomies, 220 procedures were performed by gynecologic oncologists, and 49 were performed by benign gynecologists. Washings were not performed in 5% of the procedures performed by gynecologic oncologists and 37% of the procedures performed by benign gynecologists (p <.001). Complete serial sectioning of the adnexa was not performed in 12% of the procedures performed by oncologists, and 13% of the procedures performed by benign gynecologists (p = .714). There were 8 cases (2.9%) of tubal or ovarian cancer diagnosed within this cohort. Of these cases, only 3 (1.1%) were diagnosed at the time of surgery and met the criteria for conversion to a staging procedure. CONCLUSION: Because the incidence of ovarian cancer diagnosis at the time of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is low and is often not diagnosed at the time of surgery owing to the presence of only microscopic disease, it may not be necessary for gynecologic oncologists to exclusively perform these procedures. However, this study also revealed that when this procedure is performed by benign gynecologic surgeons, some of the recommended practices are not routinely followed. If general gynecologic surgeons are to routinely perform risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomies, it is important to promote better adherence to these practices.

Health Care Provider Adherence to Surgical Guidelines for Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health care provider adherence to the surgical protocol endorsed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists at the time of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and compare adherence between gynecologic oncologists and obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns). METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, women were included if they had a pathogenic BRCA mutation and underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy between 2011 and 2017. Adherence was defined as completing all of the following: collection of washings, complete resection of the fallopian tube, and performing the Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbriated End (SEE-FIM) pathologic protocol. RESULTS: Of 290 patients who met inclusion criteria, 160 patients were treated by 18 gynecologic oncologists and 130 patients by 75 ob-gyns. Surgery was performed at 10 different hospitals throughout a single metropolitan area. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Overall, 199 cases (69%) were adherent to the surgical protocol. Gynecologic oncologists were more than twice as likely to fully adhere to the full surgical protocol as ob-gyns (91% vs 41%, P<.01). Specifically, gynecologic oncologists were more likely to resect the entire tube (99% vs 95%, P=.03), to have followed the SEE-FIM protocol (98% vs 82%, P<.01), and collect washings (94% vs 49%, P<.01). Complication rates did not differ between groups. Occult neoplasia was diagnosed in 11 patients (3.8%). The incidence of occult neoplasia was 6.3% in gynecologic oncology patients and 0.8% in obstetrics and gynecology patients (P=.03). CONCLUSION: Despite clear surgical guidelines, only two thirds of all health care providers were fully adherent to guidelines. Gynecologic oncologists were more likely to follow surgical guidelines compared with general ob-gyns and more likely to diagnose occult neoplasia despite similar patient populations. Rates of risk-reducing surgery will likely continue to increase as genetic testing becomes more widespread, highlighting the importance of health care provider education for this procedure. Centralized care or referral to subspecialists for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy may be warranted.

Results of Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Expansile and Infiltrative Mucinous Ovarian Cancers.

BACKGROUND: No series had been reported focusing on the results of fertility-sparing surgery in stage I mucinous ovarian cancers according to histotype (infiltrative vs. expansile). Investigating such outcomes was the aim of the present study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was a retrospective analysis of patients treated conservatively with preservation of the uterus and contralateral ovary from 1976 to 2016. The pathology of the tumors was reviewed by two expert pathologists according to the 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) classification criteria. Oncologic and fertility results were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, twelve with expansile and nine with infiltrative cancer. All patients had a unilateral tumor and underwent unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in one-step (n = 6) or two-step (n = 15) surgeries. All but one had complete peritoneal staging surgery based on cytology, omentectomy, and random peritoneal biopsies. Ten had nodal staging surgery. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages were IA (n = 9), IC1 (n = 6), and IC2 (n = 6); the nuclear grades were grade 1 (n = 9), grade 2 (n = 5), and grade 3 (n = 1). Two patients recurred (one expansile and one infiltrative type) 19 and 160 months after surgery, respectively. One stage IA, nuclear grade 2 expansile tumor recurred on the spared ovary; the patient remains alive. The other stage IA infiltrative tumor recurred as peritoneal spread; the patient is alive with disease. Six patients became pregnant; four with expansile tumors and two with infiltrative tumors. CONCLUSION: The type of mucinous cancer has no impact on the oncologic outcome in this series of patients treated conservatively. Fertility-sparing surgery should be considered for early-stage infiltrative-type tumors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: According to the most recently updated World Health Organization classification guidelines, mucinous cancers should be classified as either expansile or infiltrative. The infiltrative type has a poorer prognosis, but there are no data about the safety of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in this context. A collection of 21 cases reviewed by two expert pathologists this study is the first devoted to the conservative treatment of mucinous tumors according to both subtypes. The key result was that the type of mucinous cancer has no impact on the oncologic outcome; thus, FSS may be considered in both subtypes.

"Best practices in risk reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: the influence of surgical specialty".

BACKGROUND: Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO) increases survival in patients at high risk of developing ovarian cancer. While many general gynecologists perform this procedure, some argue it should be performed exclusively by specialists. In this retrospective observational study, we identified how often optimal techniques were used and whether surgeons' training impacted implementation. METHODS: We used the ACOG guidelines highlighting various aspects of the procedure to determine which elements were consistent with best practices to maximize surgical prophylaxis. All cases of RRBSO from 2006 to 2010 were identified. We abstracted data from the operative and pathology reports to review the techniques employed. Fisher's exact test and chi-square were utilized to compare differences between groups (InStat, La Jolla, CA). RESULTS: Among 263 RRBSOs, 22 were performed by general gynecologists and 241 by gynecologic oncologists. Gynecologic oncologists were more likely to perform pelvic washings-217/241 vs. 10/22 (p < .0001). They were more likely to include a description of the upper abdomen-220/241 vs. 12/22 (p < .0001). Oncologists were more likely to utilize a retroperitoneal approach to skeletonize the infundibulopelvic ligaments-157/241 vs. 3/22 (p < .0001). When operations were performed by oncologists, the specimens were more often completely sectioned-217/241 vs. 16/22 (p = .003). The use of a retroperitoneal approach among gynecologic oncologists increased over the study period (chi-square for trend, p < .0001). There was no visible trend in performance improvement in any other area when looking at either group. CONCLUSION: Gynecologic oncologists are more likely to adhere to best practice techniques when performing RRBSO, though there was room for improvement for both groups.