Women's experiences in institutional childbirth care in times of the first and second waves of COVID in Mexico. / Experiencias de mujeres en la atención del parto institucional en tiempos de la primera y segunda ola de COVID en México.

This is a qualitative study that explores the perspectives and experiences of a group of Mexican women who experienced institutionalized childbirth care in the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Through a semi-structured script, nine women who experienced childbirth care were interviewed between March and October 2020 in public and private hospitals in the city of San Luis Potosí, Mexico. Under the Grounded Theory analysis proposal, it was identified that the health strategies implemented during the pandemic brought with them a setback in the guarantee of humanized childbirth. Women described themselves as distrustful of the protocols that personnel followed to attend to their births in public sector hospitals and very confident in those implemented in the private sector. The intervention of cesarean sections without a clear justification emerged as a constant, as did early dyad separation. Healthcare personnel's and institutions' willingness and conviction to guarantee, protect and defend the right of women to experience childbirth free of violence remain fragile. Resistance persists to rethink childbirth care from a non-biomedicalizing paradigm.

Estudio de tipo cualitativo que explora las perspectivas y experiencias de un grupo de mujeres mexicanas que vivieron la atención institucionalizada del parto en la primera y segunda ola de la pandemia por COVID-19. A través de un guión semiestructurado se entrevistó a nueve mujeres que vivieron la experiencia de la atención del parto entre marzo y octubre de 2020, en hospitales públicos y privados de la ciudad de San Luis Potosí, en México. Bajo la propuesta de análisis de la teoría fundamentada, se identificó que las estrategias sanitarias implementadas en el marco de la pandemia, trajeron consigo un retroceso en la garantía del parto humanizado, las mujeres se narraron desconfiadas en los protocolos que siguió el personal para la atención de sus partos en los hospitales del sector público y muy confiadas en los que se implementaron en el sector privado. La realización de cesáreas sin una justificación clara emergió como una constante, igual que la separación temprana de los binomios. Continúa frágil la disposición y el convencimiento del personal sanitario y las instituciones para garantizar, proteger y defender el derecho de las mujeres a vivir el parto libre de violencia. Persisten resistencias para repensar la atención del parto desde un paradigma no biomédicalizante.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Obstetrics and Gynecologist Hospitalists' Impact on Maternal Mortality.

Obstetrics and gynecology hospitalists play a vital role in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality by providing immediate access to obstetric care, especially in emergencies. Their presence in hospitals ensures timely interventions and expert management, contributing to better outcomes for mothers and babies. This proactive approach can extend beyond hospital walls through education, advocacy, and community outreach initiatives aimed at improving maternal health across diverse settings.

The Meso-Level in Quality Improvement: Perspectives From a Maternal-Neonatal Health Partnership in South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Sustained implementation of facility-level quality improvement (QI) processes, such as plan-do-study-act cycles, requires enabling meso-level environments and supportive macro-level policies and strategies. Although this is well recognised, there is little systematic empirical evidence on roles and capacities, especially at the immediate meso-level of the system, that sustain QI strategies at the frontline. METHODS: In this paper we report on qualitative research to characterize the elements of a quality and outcome-oriented meso-level, focused on sub/district health systems (DHSs), conducted within a multi-level initiative to improve maternal-newborn health (MNH) in three provinces of South Africa. Drawing on the embedded experience and tacit knowledge of core project partners, obtained through in-depth interviews (39) and project documentation, we analysed thematically the roles, capacities and systems required at the meso-level for sustained QI, and experiences with strengthening the meso-level. RESULTS: Meso-level QI roles identified included establishing and supporting QI systems and strengthening delivery networks. We propose three elements of system capacity as enabling these meso-level roles: (1) leadership stability and capacity, (2) the presence of formal mechanisms to coordinate service delivery processes at sub-district and district levels (including governance, referral and outreach systems), and (3) responsive district support systems (including quality oriented human resource, information, and emergency medical services [EMS] management), embedded within supportive relational eco-systems and appropriate decision-space. While respondents reported successes with system strengthening, overall, the meso-level was regarded as poorly oriented to and even disabling of quality at the frontline. CONCLUSION: We argue for a more explicit orientation to quality and outcomes as an essential district and sub-district function (which we refer to as meso-level stewardship), requiring appropriate structures, processes, and capacities.

Health system responsiveness and its associated factors for intrapartum care in conflict affected areas in Amhara region, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: In Ethiopia, information about health system responsiveness (HSR) in conflict-affected areas is limited. No previous local study was conducted on the assessment of HSR at the community level. Hence, the study assessed HSR for intrapartum care in conflict-affected areas in Amhara region, Ethiopia. DESIGN: Community-based cross-sectional study design. SETTING: Wadila, Gayint and Meket districts, Amhara region, Ethiopia. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were 419 mothers who gave birth in conflict-affected areas within the last 6 months. The study included all mothers who gave birth at health facilities but excluded those who delivered at home, critically ill or unable to hear. OUTCOME: HSR was the outcome variable. In this regard, the study assessed how mothers were treated and the situation in which they were cared for in relation to their experience during the conflict. METHODS: We conducted the study in the community, where we analysed eight domains of HSR to identify 30 measurement items related to intrapartum care responsiveness. The domains we looked at were dignity (4), autonomy (4), confidentiality (2), communication (5), prompt attention (5), social support (3), choice (3) and basic amenities (4). We used a multiple linear regression model to analyse the data, and in this model, we used an unstandardized ß coefficient with a 95% CI and a p value of less than 0.05 to determine the factors significantly associated with HSR. RESULTS: The findings of our study revealed that the overall proportion of HSR in intrapartum care was 45.11% (95% CI: 40.38 to 49.92). The performance of responsiveness was the lowest in the autonomy, choice and prompt attention domains at 35.5%, 49.4% and 52.0%, respectively. Mothers living in urban areas (ß=4.28; 95% CI: 2.06 to 6.50), government employees (ß=4.99; 95% CI: 0.51 to 9.48), those mothers stayed at the health facilities before delivery/during conflict (ß=0.22; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.35), those who were satisfied with the healthcare service (ß=0.69; 95% CI: 0.08 to 1.30) and those who perceived the quality of healthcare favourable (ß=0.96; 95% CI: 0.72 to 1.19) were more likely to rate HSR positively. On the other hand, joint decision-making for health (ß=-2.46; 95% CI: -4.81 to -0.10) and hospital delivery (ß=-3.62; 95% CI: -5.60 to -1.63) were negatively associated with HSR. CONCLUSION: In the Amhara region of Ethiopia, over 50% of mothers living in areas affected by conflict reported that health systems were not responsive with respect to intrapartum care. Therefore, all stakeholders should work together to ensure that intrapartum care is responsive to conflict-affected areas, with a focus on providing women autonomy and choice.

Structural barriers to maternity care in Cameroon: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The maternal mortality and perinatal mortality rate in Cameroon are among the highest worldwide. To improve these outcomes, we conducted a formative qualitative assessment to inform the adaptation of a mobile provider-to-provider intervention in Cameroon. We explored the complex interplay of structural barriers on maternity care in this low-resourced nation. The study aimed to identify structural barriers to maternal care during the early adaptation of the mobile Medical Information Service via Telephone (mMIST) program in Cameroon. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews and focus groups with 56 key stakeholders including previously and currently pregnant women, primary healthcare providers, administrators, and representatives of the Ministry of Health, recruited by purposive sampling. Thematic coding and analysis via modified grounded theory approach were conducted using NVivo12 software. RESULTS: Three main structural barriers emerged: (1) civil unrest (conflict between Ambazonian militant groups and the Cameroonian government in the Northwest), (2) limitations of the healthcare system, (3) inadequate physical infrastructure. Civil unrest impacted personal security, transportation safety, and disrupted medical transport system. Limitations of healthcare system involved critical shortages of skilled personnel and medical equipment, low commitment to evidence-based care, poor reputation, ineffective health system communication, incentives affecting care, and inadequate data collection. Inadequate physical infrastructure included frequent power outages and geographic distribution of healthcare facilities leading to logistical challenges. CONCLUSION: Dynamic inter-relations among structural level factors create barriers to maternity care in Cameroon. Implementation of policies and intervention programs addressing structural barriers are necessary to facilitate timely access and utilization of high-quality maternity care.

Addressing obstetric violence: a scoping review of interventions in healthcare and their impact on maternal care quality.

Background: The mistreatment and abuse of women during childbirth have been recognized as a major global health challenge, impeding facility-based delivery and contributing to the high maternal mortalities globally. The World Health Organization has specifically called for interventions to deal with obstetric violence. This scoping review consolidates the existing literature on interventions aimed at reducing obstetric violence and synthesizes existing knowledge on their impact in promoting respectful maternity care. Methodology: Thirteen electronic databases were searched for relevant articles from January 2001 to March 2023. A total of 863 records were identified, and 72 full-text articles were retrieved for further screening. The review includes 16 studies, particularly from low- and middle-income countries, with interventions implemented at medical facilities and involving both women and healthcare providers. Eight of the studies were quantitative, three were qualitative and five used a mixed-methods approach. Findings: The results reveal a promising trend in reducing obstetric violence through various interventions. Ten different types of interventions were identified, highlighting strategies to improve the quality of maternity care and enhance patient-centered care. Improved patient-provider communication skills, increased privacy measures, and reduced abuse and mistreatment emerged as common themes. Enhanced communication skills, including open discussions and the right to be informed, were crucial in reducing obstetric violence. Privacy measures, such as separate rooms, curtains, and birth companions effectively decreased incidents of non-confidential care. General abuse and mistreatment, including physical abuse and neglect, were also reduced, leading to improved perceptions of respectful care during childbirth. Conclusion: Overall, the interventions had a favorable impact on obstetric violence reduction and women's childbirth experiences. However, despite promising results, obstetric violence remains prevalent worldwide, necessitating more efforts to implement effective interventions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first scoping review on obstetric violence interventions, providing a comprehensive overview of the state of the art. We suggest that further research is needed to explore new interventions, particularly gender-sensitive interventions, to contribute to a growing body of knowledge on the prevention of obstetric violence.

Designing a Midwife-Led Birth Center Program Based on the MAP-IT Model: A Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: In recent decades, medical supervision of the labor and delivery process has expanded beyond its boundaries to the extent that in many settings, childbirth has become a medical event. This situation has influenced midwifery care. One of the significant barriers to midwives providing care to pregnant women is the medicalization of childbirth. So far, the policies and programs of the Ministry of Health to reduce medical interventions and cesarean section rates have not been successful. Therefore, the current study aims to be conducted with the purpose of "Designing a Midwife-Led Birth Center Program Based on the MAP-IT Model". METHODS/DESIGN: The current study is a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design by using the MAP-IT model includes 5 steps: Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, and Track, providing a framework for planning and evaluating public health interventions in a community. It will be implemented in three stages: The first phase of the research will be a cross-sectional descriptive study to determine the attitudes and preferences towards establishing a midwifery-led birthing center focusing on midwives and women of childbearing age by using two researcher-made questionnaires to assess the participants' attitudes and preferences toward establishing a midwifery-led birthing center. Subsequently, extreme cases will be selected based on the participants' average attitude scores toward establishing a midwifery-led birthing center in the quantitative section. In the second stage of the study, qualitative in-depth interviews will be conducted with the identified extreme cases from the first quantitative phase and other stakeholders (the first and second steps of the MAP-IT model, namely identifying and forming a stakeholder coalition, and assessing community resources and real needs). In this stage, the conventional qualitative content analysis approach will be used. Subsequently, based on the quantitative and qualitative data obtained up to this stage, a midwifery-led birthing center program based on the third step of the MAP-IT model, namely Plan, will be developed and validated using the Delphi method. DISCUSSION: This is the first study that uses a mixed-method approach for designing a midwife-led maternity care program based on the MAP-IT model. This study will fill the research gap in the field of improving midwife-led maternity care and designing a program based on the needs of a large group of pregnant mothers. We hope this program facilitates improved eligibility of midwifery to continue care to manage and improve their health easily and affordably. ETHICAL CODE: IR.MUMS.NURSE.REC. 1403. 014.

In recent decades, medical management of the labor and delivery process has extended beyond its limitations to the extent that in many settings, childbirth has become a medical event. This situation has influenced midwifery care. The global midwifery situation indicates that one in every five women worldwide gives birth without the support of a skilled attendant. One of the significant barriers to midwives providing care to pregnant women is the medicalization of childbirth. In industrialized countries, maternal and infant mortality rates have decreased over the past 60 years due to medical or social reasons. So far, the policies and programs of the Ministry of Health to diminish medical interventions and cesarean section rates have not been successful. Midwifery models in hospital care contain midwives who support women's choices and diverse ideas about childbirth on the one hand, and on the other hand, they must adhere to organizational guidelines as employees, primarily based on a medical and pathological approach rather than a health-oriented and midwifery perspective. Therefore, the current study aims to be conducted with the purpose of "Designing a midwifery-led birth centered maternity program based on the MAP-IT model". It is a Model for Implementing Healthy People 2030, (Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track), a step-by-step method for creating healthy communities. Using MAP-IT can help public health professionals and community changemakers implement a plan that is tailored to a community's needs and assets.

Midwives' and registered nurses' role and scope of practice in acute early pregnancy care settings in Australia: A qualitative descriptive study.

PROBLEM: There is little documented evidence regarding the practice of midwives providing care for women with acute concerns in early pregnancy (< 20 weeks) in Australia. BACKGROUND: Women can experience unexpected complications at any gestation of pregnancy and may seek acute care in an emergency or gynaecology service, usually staffed by registered nurses (RNs). They may not receive care from specialised pregnancy clinicians, including midwives. The role and scope of practice of midwives working in acute early pregnancy settings in Australia has not been previously reported. This study provides an opportunity to document practice in an area of pregnancy care not often visible within maternity services in Australia. RESEARCH AIM: To describe midwives' and RNs perceptions, perspectives and experiences of role and scope of practice in acute early pregnancy care provision in Australia. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive approach was adopted. Midwives and RNs with acute early pregnancy knowledge and experience were recruited. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data analysed using inductive thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Fifteen participants were interviewed. Three themes were constructed from interview data: Personal and Professional Influences; Being There for Women; The Impact of Setting. DISCUSSION: Findings reinforce the lack of clarity around how midwives' scope is enabled in traditional acute early pregnancy care. Setting of care has influenced practice and seen a barrier for midwives who don't hold nursing registration from fulfilling professional scope. Results provide novel benchmarking evidence regarding a largely hidden area of midwifery, signposting areas for reform within education, policy and health service sectors.

Endorsed midwife prescribing in Australia: "[For] the women, more than anything".

PROBLEM: Prescribing by Endorsed Midwives has existed in Australia for more than ten years. Significant barriers exist in the bureaucracy surrounding prescribing and state and territory legislation which further constrain midwives capacity to prescribe required medications. BACKGROUND: Current evidence indicates Endorsed Midwives improve timely access to medications and can experience both enablers and barriers to prescribing. AIM: To explore Endorsed Midwives' lived experiences of medication prescribing, including which medications are being prescribed, how this affects the women in their care, midwives' practice, and perspectives on the future of midwifery prescribing. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative approach was used. Data collection occurred through semi-structured interviews (n=10) of Endorsed Midwives from varied Australian practice contexts and locations. Data analysis followed Reflexive Thematic Analysis. FINDINGS: Four themes were developed: Medication prescription as essential healthcare; Prescribing optimises midwifery practice; External structures can both promote and inhibit the capacity to prescribe; The future of prescribing. DISCUSSION: Endorsed Midwife prescribing has the potential to positively impact women's maternity care and enable midwives to fulfil their scope of practice. However, limitations to prescribing need to be addressed to capitalise on these benefits. CONCLUSION: Significant reform of health service policy, state and territory legislation and further development of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme are required to fully embrace and capitalise on the full scope of Endorsed Midwives in the Australian Healthcare system.

"A safe space"; A statewide evaluation of Midwifery Antenatal and Postnatal Service (MAPS) using the quality maternal newborn care, evidence informed framework.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends Midwifery Continuity of Care (MCoC) due to the consistent improvements in outcomes for mothers and babies. Surveys from the United Kingdom and Australia reported large numbers of midwives are unable to commit to the on call component required to provide MCoC across the continuum. To address this challenge a modified MCoC model called Midwifery Antenatal and Postnatal Services (MAPS) has been introduced. The aim of this study was to evaluate MAPS services in six sites across one State in Australia. METHODS: A multi-site qualitative descriptive study was undertaken framed by the Quality Maternal Newborn Care (QMNC) Framework. The QMNC framework was used to develop focus group questions for data collection, and as a lens for analysing data. Data were collected via focus groups from midwives and women at six sites ranging from metropolitan to regional and rural settings and thematically analysed. FINDINGS: Participants (n=80) included women (n=28), midwives (n=44) and MAPS managers (n=8). This paper reports the findings from the women and midwives, presented under three themes: Getting onto the program, Knowing the story and Building confidence by sharing information. Each theme had subthemes and the findings were aligned either positively or negatively with the QMNC framework. CONCLUSION: This study found the MAPS model aligns in positive ways with the QMNC quality care framework with some recommendations to improve quality care. Midwives want to provide continuity of care and MAPS is a useful model for providing continuity through the antenatal and postnatal periods.

Quality Assessment of Interactive Mobile Application - Maternal and Infant Care for Tribal Birth Attendants.

Digital health interventions can overcome geographical barriers and prepare health-care providers for better health outcomes in rural and remote tribal areas, however, it has not been explored among traditional birth attendants (TBAs). A mobile application, "maternal and infant care" (MAI) for capacity building of tribal birth attendants was developed and its quality was evaluated using the Mobile Application Rating Scale for user's interest in and satisfaction with the esthetics, information, and functionality. Thirteen Android user TBAs with the MAI application were piloted with the MARS checklist. Engagement, functionality, esthetics, and information quality; and one subjective quality scale having 29 items were used. The application was found to be entertaining excellent rating (mean score ± standard deviation) (4.00 ± 0.58), and scored high on performance (3.77 ± 0.93); layout design (3.85 ± 0.90); subjective quality (4.23 ± 0.93), however, scored minimum on interest; gestural design; visual appeal, etc. MAI is a user-friendly, culturally acceptable Android app that can be used for the capacity building of frontline workers.

Timeliness and quality of peripartum care provision during a health system strengthening initiative in rural Guinea-Bissau: a qualitative situation analysis.

Guinea-Bissau has among the world's highest maternal and perinatal mortality rates. To improve access to quality maternal and child health (MCH) services and thereby reduce mortality, a national health system strengthening initiative has been implemented. However, despite improved coverage of MCH services, perinatal mortality remained high. Using a systems-thinking lens, we conducted a situation analysis to explore factors shaping timeliness and quality of facility-based care during labour, childbirth, and the immediate postpartum period in rural Guinea-Bissau. We implemented in-depth interviews with eight peripartum care providers and participant observations at two health facilities (192 h) in 2021-22, and analysed interview transcripts and field notes using thematic network analysis. While providers considered health facilities as the only reasonable place of birth and promoted facility birth uptake, timeliness and quality of care were severely compromised by geographical, material and human-resource constraints. Providers especially experienced a lack of human resources and materials (e.g., essential medicines, consumables, appropriate equipment), and explained material constraints by discontinued donor supplies. In response, providers applied several adaptation strategies including prescribing materials for private purchase, omitting tests, and delegating tasks to birth companions. Consequences included financial barriers to care, compromised patient and occupational safety, delays, and diffusion of health worker responsibilities. Further, providers explained that in response to persisting access barriers, women conditioned care seeking on their perceived risk of developing birthing complications. Our findings highlight the need for continuous monitoring of factors constraining timeliness and quality of essential MCH services during the implementation of health system strengthening initiatives.

Examining the validity and reliability of the COMcareSS (Continuity of Midwifery Care Satisfaction Survey).

BACKGROUND: Continuity of midwifery care has been proven to show an improvement in clinical outcomes for women and greater maternal satisfaction with maternity care. Several questionnaires have been developed to measure satisfaction with maternity services although few are suitable for continuity of midwifery maternity care models, and many have not been validated. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the newly developed Continuity of Midwifery Care Satisfaction Survey (COMcareSS) with a cohort of women who have recently experienced continuity of midwifery care. METHODS: The COMcareSS was distributed to women in Australia who had experienced a live birth within a continuity model of midwifery care and were up to two months postpartum. Factor analysis was conducted, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient calculated for the 34-item scale. FINDINGS: In total 272 completed responses were recorded. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.96 suggesting some redundancy in items. There was a lack of variation in responses. In factor analysis, only one factor could feasibly be attempted. This accounted for 76 % of variation in responses. CONCLUSION: The COMcareSS scale is the first to be developed to measure maternal satisfaction with continuity of midwifery led care. The 34-item scale has good internal consistency. The scale may be unidimensional though the lack of variation in responses means that other possible latent constructs, were not able to be detected. Use of a standardised scale such as the COMcareSS will facilitate benchmarking between services and, comparison and meta-analysis in research studies.

Uncertainty in Maternity Care.

The Editor in Chief reflects on uncertainty in maternity care.

Exploring Infant Feeding Experiences and Maternity Care Practices in Appalachia.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to explore postpartum individuals' experiences and perceptions of breastfeeding and International Board Certified Lactation Consultants' (IBCLC) knowledge and perceptions of maternity care practices and perceived barriers to breastfeeding among their patient populations in Appalachia. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with seven IBCLCs and seven postpartum individuals. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted to determine emergent themes and subthemes related to knowledge/perceptions, experiences, and barriers to breastfeeding among postpartum individuals, as well as emergent themes associated with the knowledge and perceptions of maternity care practices, easy-/difficult-to-implement Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative maternity care practices, and perceived barriers to breastfeeding among IBCLCs. RESULTS: Postpartum individuals recruited from an Appalachian obstetrics/gynecology clinic were aware of the benefits of breastfeeding, but their infant feeding journeys were more stressful than they expected, and they had limited access to lactation support and breastfeeding education/information. IBCLCs identified the benefits of the Baby-Friendly maternity care practices but mentioned some risks, especially when there is a lack of communication and coordination among providers. Environmental and informational barriers were identified by both postpartum individuals and IBCLCs as breastfeeding challenges potentially amenable to change. CONCLUSIONS: To support postpartum mothers in the Appalachian region, environmental barriers (eg, lack of lactation support) and informational barriers (eg, lack of prenatal education) need to be addressed.

Quality of hospital labour and delivery care: A multilevel analysis in Southern Nations and Nationalities People's Region of Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Ethiopia has one of the highest maternal mortality ratios in Africa. Few have examined the quality of labour and delivery (L&D) care in the country. This study evaluated the quality of routine L&D care and identified patient-level and hospital-level factors associated with the quality of care in a subset of government hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a facility-based, cross-sectional study using direct non-participant observation carried out in 2016. All mothers who received routine L&D care services at government hospitals (n = 20) in one of the populous regions of Ethiopia, Southern Nations Nationalities and People's Region (SNNPR), were included. Mixed effects multilevel linear regression modeling was employed in two stages using hospital as a random effect, with quality of L&D care as the outcome and selected patient and hospital characteristics as independent variables. Patient characteristics included woman's age, number of previous births, number of skilled attendants involved in care process, and presence of any danger sign in current pregnancy. Hospital characteristics included teaching hospital status, mean number of attended births in the previous year, number of fulltime skilled attendants in the L&D ward, whether the hospital had offered refresher training on L&D care in the previous 12 months, and the extent to which the hospital met the 2014 Ethiopian Ministry of Health standards regarding to resources available for providing quality of L&D care (measured on a 0-100% scale). These standards pertain to availability of human resource by category and training status, availability of essential drugs, supplies and equipment in L&D ward, availability of laboratory services and safe blood, and availability of essential guidelines for key L&D care processes. RESULTS: On average, the hospitals met two-thirds of the standards for L&D care quality, with substantial variation between hospitals (standard deviation 10.9 percentage points). While the highest performing hospital met 91.3% of standards, the lowest performing hospital met only 35.8% of the standards. Hospitals had the highest adherence to standards in the domain of immediate and essential newborn care practices (86.8%), followed by the domain of care during the second and third stages of labour (77.9%). Hospitals scored substantially lower in the domains of active management of third stage of labour (AMTSL) (42.2%), interpersonal communication (47.2%), and initial assessment of the woman in labour (59.6%). We found the quality of L&D care score was significantly higher for women who had a history of any danger sign (ß = 5.66; p-value = 0.001) and for women who were cared for at a teaching hospital (ß = 12.10; p-value = 0.005). Additionally, hospitals with lower volume and more resources available for L&D care (P-values < 0.01) had higher L&D quality scores. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the quality of L&D care provided to labouring mothers at government hospitals in SNNPR was limited. Lack of adherence to standards in the areas of the critical tasks of initial assessment, AMTSL, interpersonal communication during L&D, and respect for women's preferences are especially concerning. Without greater attention to the quality of L&D care, regardless of how accessible hospital L&D care becomes, maternal and neonatal mortality rates are unlikely to decrease substantially.

Integrating support persons into maternity care and associations with quality of care: a postpartum survey of mothers and support persons in Kenya.

BACKGROUND: Despite research that has shown that the presence of support persons during maternity care is associated with more respectful care, support persons are frequently excluded due to facility practices or negative attitudes of providers. Little quantitative research has examined how integrating support persons in maternity care has implications for the quality of care received by women, a potential pathway for improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes. This study aimed to investigate how integrating support persons in maternity care is associated with multiple dimensions of the quality of maternity care. METHODS: We used facility-based cross-sectional survey data from women (n = 1,138) who gave birth at six high-volume facilities in Nairobi and Kiambu counties in Kenya and their support persons (n = 606) present during the immediate postpartum period. Integration was measured by the Person-Centered Integration of Support Persons (PC-ISP) items. We investigated quality of care outcomes including person-centered care outcomes (i.e., Person-Centered Maternity Care (PCMC) and Satisfaction with care) and clinical outcomes (i.e., Implementation of WHO-recommended clinical practices). We used fractional regression with robust standard errors to estimate associations between PC-ISP and care outcomes. RESULTS: Compared to low integration, high integration (≥four woman-reported PC-ISP experiences vs. <4) was associated with multiple dimensions of quality care: 3.71%-point (95% CI: 2.95%, 4.46%) higher PCMC scores, 2.76%-point higher (95% CI: 1.86%, 3.65%) satisfaction with care scores, and 4.43%-point (95% CI: 3.52%, 5.34%) higher key clinical practices, controlling for covariates. PC-ISP indicators related to communication with providers showed stronger associations with quality of care compared to other PC-ISP sub-constructs. Some support person-reported PC-ISP experiences were positively associated with women's satisfaction and key practices. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating support persons, as key advocates for women, is important for respectful maternity care. Practices to better integrate support persons, especially improving communication between support persons with providers, can potentially improve the person-centered and clinical quality of maternity care in Kenya and other low-resource settings.

Translating lessons to reinforce national stillbirth response; multi-stakeholder perspectives regarding priorities and opportunities to deliver quality evidence-based interventions within a limited-resource context in Uganda.

BACKGROUND: There is noted increase in attention towards implementation of evidence-based interventions in response to the stillbirth burden in low- and middle-income countries including Uganda. Recent results reporting some of the strategies adopted have tended to focus much attention towards their overall effect on the stillbirth burden. More is needed regarding stakeholder reflections on priorities and opportunities for delivering quality services within a limited resource setting like Uganda. This paper bridges this knowledge gap. METHODS: Data collection occurred between March and June 2019 at the national level. Qualitative interviews were analysed using a thematic analysis technique. RESULTS: Identified priorities included; a focus on supportive functions such as the referral system, attention to the demand side component of maternal health services, and improvements in the support supervision particularly focusing on empowering subnational level actors. The need to strengthen the learning for better implementation of strategies which are compatible with context was also reported. A comprehensive and favourable policy environment with the potential to direct implementation of strategies, harnessing the private sector contribution as well as the role of national level champions and patient advocates to amplify national stillbirth reduction efforts for continued visibility and impact were recommended. CONCLUSION: Great potential exists within the current strategies to address the national stillbirth burden. However, priorities such as improving the supportive functions of MCH service delivery and attention to the demand side need to be pursued more for better service delivery with opportunities including a favourable policy environment primed to better serve the current strategies. This calls for dedicated efforts targeted at addressing gaps within the existing priorities and opportunities for better delivery of national strategies to address the stillbirth burden in Uganda.