RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of mental health conditions among women with HIV in Canada ranges between 29.5% and 57.4%, highlighting the need for accessible mental health care. We aimed to (1) describe the availability and use of mental health services among women with HIV and (2) identify characteristics associated with reporting that shortages of these services presented a problem in their care. METHODS: Baseline data from the Canadian HIV Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health Cohort Study were analysed. Self-reported availability and use of mental health services were examined using descriptive statistics. Participants indicated whether a lack of mental health support was a problem in their care. Logistic regression models were constructed to determine associations between sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics and reported problematic shortages. RESULTS: Of 1422 women, 26.7% (n = 380) used mental health services in the last year, which most accessed through their HIV clinic. Thirty-eight percent (n = 541) reported that a shortage of mental health support was a problem in their care. Among this subset, 22.1% (n = 119) used services at their HIV clinic, 26.5% (n = 143) reported available services but did not use them, and 51.4% (n = 277) either indicated that these services were unavailable, did not know if such services were available, or were unengaged in HIV care. Factors associated with reporting problematic shortages included rural residence [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-2.77], higher education level (aOR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.02-2.02), and higher HIV stigma score (aOR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.03). Conversely, African/Caribbean/Black identity (aOR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.26-0.54), history of recreational drug use (aOR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.39-0.81), and Quebec residence (aOR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.50-0.96) were associated with lower odds of reporting service shortages. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the HIV clinic as the primary location of mental health service use. However, existing services may not be sufficient to reach all patients or meet specific needs. Furthermore, the low uptake among those reporting a shortage suggests a lack of connection to services or patient knowledge about their availability. Characteristics associated with reporting shortages reflect geographic and socioeconomic disparities that must be accounted for in future service design.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud Mental , Humanos , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Canadá/epidemiología , Adulto , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
In the rural United States, provider shortages, inadequate insurance coverage, high poverty rates, limited transportation, privacy concerns, and stigma make accessing mental healthcare difficult. Innovative, localized strategies are needed to overcome these barriers, but little is known about what strategies may be feasible in, or acceptable to, rural communities. We aimed to identify barriers youth face in accessing mental healthcare in rural Washington State and to generate ideas to improve access. METHODS: Semi-structured, key informant interviews were conducted by telephone with adult community members, including parents, teachers, and healthcare providers. Participants answered questions related to barriers to mental healthcare access that confront youth and approaches to improving access. Detailed, de-identified field notes were analyzed using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Limited resources and stigma were the two primary barriers to accessing mental healthcare that youth encounter in the community. Limited resources included lack of services and transportation, inconsistent funding and mental health programming, and workforce shortages. Stigma associated with seeking mental healthcare was of particular concern for youth with diverse identities who experience additional stigma. CONCLUSIONS: Improving access to mental healthcare for rural youth will require building a strong mental health workforce and championing efforts to reduce stigma associated with help-seeking.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud Mental , Población Rural , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Adolescente , Washingtón , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Estigma SocialRESUMEN
The United States is facing a mental health workforce shortage, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have historically grappled with even greater shortages. Therefore, LMICs have thought creatively about expanding the mental health workforce and the settings in which to deliver evidence-based and equitable mental health care. The authors introduce some mental health interventions in LMICs, describe evidence of the efficacy of these interventions gleaned from this context, and discuss the applicability of these interventions to the United States. The authors also reflect on the benefits and challenges of implementing these interventions in the U.S. mental health care system to alleviate its current workforce shortage.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Países en Desarrollo , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Servicios de Salud Mental , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos Humanos , Personal de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is evidence of Indigenous and ethnic minority inequities in the incidence and outcomes of early psychosis. Racism has been implicated as having an important role. AIM: To use Indigenous experiences to develop a more detailed understanding of how racism operates to impact early psychosis outcomes. METHODS: Critical Race Theory informed the methodology used. Twenty-three Indigenous participants participated in four family focus group interviews and thirteen individual interviews, comprising of 9 Maori youth with early psychosis, 10 family members and 4 Maori mental health professionals. An analysis of the data was undertaken using deductive structural coding to identify descriptions of racism, followed by inductive descriptive and pattern coding. RESULTS: Participant experiences revealed how racism operates as a socio-cultural phenomenon that interacts with institutional policy and culture across systems pertaining to social responsiveness, risk discourse, and mental health service structures. This is described across three major themes: 1) selective responses based on racial stereotypes, 2) race related risk assessment bias and 3) institutional racism in the mental health workforce. The impacts of racism were reported as inaction in the face of social need, increased use of coercive practices and an under resourced Indigenous mental health workforce. CONCLUSION: The study illustrated the inter-related nature of interpersonal, institutional and structural racism with examples of interpersonal racism in the form of negative stereotypes interacting with organizational, socio-cultural and political priorities. These findings indicate that organizational cultures may differentially impact Indigenous and minority people and that social responsiveness, risk discourse and the distribution of workforce expenditure are important targets for anti-racism efforts.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Pueblo Maorí , Trastornos Psicóticos , Racismo , Adolescente , Humanos , Etnicidad , Pueblo Maorí/psicología , Grupos Minoritarios/psicología , Trastornos Psicóticos/economía , Trastornos Psicóticos/etnología , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Racismo/economía , Racismo/etnología , Racismo/psicología , Racismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/ética , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Servicios de Salud Mental/ética , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Servicios de Salud del Indígena/economía , Servicios de Salud del Indígena/ética , Servicios de Salud del Indígena/provisión & distribución , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economía , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/economía , Ética Institucional , Responsabilidad SocialRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Utilization of the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline (Lifeline; formerly called the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline) was analyzed in relation to suicide deaths in U.S. states between 2007 and 2020 to identify states with potential unmet need for mental health crisis hotline services. METHODS: Annual state call rates were calculated from calls routed to the Lifeline during the 2007-2020 period (N=13.6 million). Annual state suicide mortality rates (standardized) were calculated from suicide deaths reported to the National Vital Statistics System (2007-2020 cumulative deaths=588,122). Call rate ratio (CRR) and mortality rate ratio (MRR) were estimated by state and year. RESULTS: Sixteen U.S. states demonstrated a consistently high MRR and a low CRR, suggesting high suicide burden and relatively low Lifeline use. Heterogeneity in state CRRs decreased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Prioritizing states with a high MRR and a low CRR for messaging and outreach regarding the availability of the Lifeline can ensure more equitable, need-based access to this critical resource.
Asunto(s)
Líneas Directas , Prevención del Suicidio , Suicidio Completo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Líneas Directas/provisión & distribución , Líneas Directas/tendencias , Prevención del Suicidio/métodos , Prevención del Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención del Suicidio/provisión & distribución , Prevención del Suicidio/tendencias , Suicidio Completo/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio Completo/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Poblaciones Vulnerables/estadística & datos numéricosAsunto(s)
Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Servicios de Salud Mental , Salud Mental , Pandemias , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría) , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribuciónRESUMEN
Improvements are needed to address high rates of suicide.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Servicios de Salud Rural , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Causas de Muerte/tendencias , Humanos , Suicidio/tendenciasRESUMEN
Resumo Introdução: Os Serviços Residenciais Terapêuticos (SRT) são pontos da Rede de Atenção Psicossocial alinhados com a lógica da desinstitucionalização. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar a percepção de 'casa' pela equipe de cuidadoras de SRT e suas implicações para a produção do cuidado durante a pandemia de Covid-19. Métodos: Estudo qualitativo de abordagem cartográfica que teve como cenário de estudo 4 SRT do município do Rio de Janeiro. Para a coleta dos dados, foram realizadas entrevistas com 9 trabalhadoras e observação participante de reuniões. Resultados e discussão: Os analisadores Lugar de Casa e Efeitos da Pandemia emergiram do processamento. O primeiro mostra a percepção das trabalhadoras acerca do ambiente da casa, enquanto o segundo traz a influência da pandemia na produção do cuidado nas SRT. O ambiente das residências é múltiplo, diverso e, por vezes, contraditório, permeado por diferentes modos de vida e influenciado por aspectos culturais, percepções e experiências vividas.
Abstract Introduction: The Residential Therapeutic Services (RTS) are places of the Psychosocial Care Network aligned with the logic of deinstitutionalization. This study aimed to analyze the perception of 'home' by the SRT team of caregivers and its implications for the production of care in the Covid-19 pandemic situation. Methods: Qualitative study of cartographic approach, which had 4 SRT in the city of Rio de Janeiro as scenario. Data collection involved interviews with 9 workers and participant observation of the SRTs' meetings. Results and Discussion: The analyzers Home and Pandemic Effects emerged from analysis. The first analyzer shows the workers' perception of the home environment, while the second analyzes the production of care and the influence of the Covid-19 pandemic on the SRT. The residence environment is multiple, diverse, sometimes contradictory, composed of different lifestyles and influenced by cultural aspects, perceptions and life experiences.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Sistema Único de Salud , Desinstitucionalización/métodos , Rehabilitación Psiquiátrica/métodos , COVID-19 , Política de Salud , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Brasil , Personal de Salud , Investigación CualitativaAsunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Cuarentena/psicología , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud/etnología , Ideación Suicida , Adulto , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Miedo , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Massachusetts , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: National movements have raised awareness of the adverse mental health effects of police brutality. This study examines the relationship between perceived police brutality and unmet need for mental health care. DATA SOURCES: We used the 2018 Survey of the Health of Urban Residents (N = 4338), a quota sample survey of adults in urban areas in the contiguous United States. STUDY DESIGN: Multivariate regressions were used to understand the association between police brutality and unmet need for mental health care. Unmet need was regressed on police brutality (the independent variable), controlling for sociodemographic and health status characteristics of respondents and access to care. We then stratified the sample by experiences of police brutality (no negative encounters with the police, encounters that were perceived as necessary, and encounters that were considered unnecessary) and described how medical mistrust and perceived respect within health care settings were associated with odds of unmet need for each subsample. DATA COLLECTION: Data were collected online. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Negative police encounters perceived as necessary were associated with greater odds of unmet need compared to no negative police encounters (odds ratio [OR] = 1.98, confidence interval [CI] = 1.30-2.65). Odds of unmet need were also higher among persons with negative and unnecessary police encounters (OR = 1.28, CI = 1.05-1.56). Greater respect was associated with lower odds of unmet need among persons who reported negative unnecessary encounters with the police (OR = 0.88, CI = 0.72-0.97). Medical mistrust was associated with greater odds of unmet need among those with negative unnecessary police encounters (OR = 1.52, CI = 1.12-1.93). CONCLUSIONS: Persons who are exposed to police brutality are also likely to be those who experience unmet need for mental health care. Ensuring that they feel respected within medical settings and establishing conditions that build trust in medical institutions are important for eliminating unmet need for mental health care.
Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Policia/organización & administración , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Confianza , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Integrated primary care teams are ideally positioned to support the mental health care needs arising during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding how COVID-19 has affected mental health care delivery within primary care settings will be critical to inform future policy and practice decisions during the later phases of the pandemic and beyond. The objective of our study was to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care teams' delivery of mental health care. METHODS: A qualitative study using focus groups conducted with primary care teams in Ontario, Canada. Focus group data was analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: We conducted 11 focus groups with 10 primary care teams and a total of 48 participants. With respect to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health care in primary care teams, we identified three key themes: i) the high demand for mental health care, ii) the rapid transformation to virtual care, and iii) the impact on providers. CONCLUSIONS: From the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care quickly responded to the rising mental health care demands of their patients. Despite the numerous challenges they faced with the rapid transition to virtual care, primary care teams have persevered. It is essential that policy and decision-makers take note of the toll that these demands have placed on providers. There is an immediate need to enhance primary care's capacity for mental health care for the duration of the pandemic and beyond.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Mental , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud , Telemedicina , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/psicología , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental/tendencias , Servicios de Salud Mental/normas , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Ontario/epidemiología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/tendencias , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Globally, governments have introduced a variety of public health measures including restrictions and reducing face-to-face contact, to control the spread of COVID-19. This has implications for mental health services in terms of support and treatment for vulnerable groups such as people with pre-existent mental health conditions. However, there is limited evidence of the impact of COVID-19 and its related restrictions on people with pre-existent mental health conditions. OBJECTIVES: To identify the impact of COVID-19 and its related restrictions on people with pre-existent mental health conditions. METHODS: A scoping review of the literature was employed. Eight electronic databases (PsycINFO, Cochrane, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Academic Search Complete) were searched and 2566 papers identified. 30 papers met the criteria for this review and findings were summarised under three key review questions. RESULTS: COVID-19 and its related restrictions have had a notable effect on people with pre-existent mental health conditions. Public health restrictions have contributed to increased levels of social isolation, loneliness, and reduced opportunities for people to connect with others. Reduced access to health services and treatments has compounded matters for those seeking support. Exacerbation and deterioration of symptoms are commonly reported and can lead to greater susceptibility to COVID-19 infection. IMPLICATIONS: The importance of proactive planning, alternative accessible healthcare services and supports for vulnerable and at-risk groups is illuminated. Increased monitoring, early intervention and individually tailored care strategies are advocated. Recommendations revolve around the need for enhanced provision of remote support strategies facilitated using technology enhanced resources. ACCESSIBLE SUMMARY.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Salud Mental , COVID-19/epidemiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
The following case series provides several examples from the Digital Clinic, an outpatient mental health program which uses smartphone technology to augment traditional mental health care. The themes highlighted in this piece, expanding emotional-awareness, symptom tracking, and medication management, provide real-clinical examples of how the Digital Clinic offered remote mental health care to a diverse group of people. Furthermore, the following piece demonstrates to practicing clinicians how digital technologies, like smartphone apps, can diversify methods of clinical engagement, assist with collecting health metrics in a safe and ethical manner, and promote person centred care. With the COVID-19 pandemic forcing re-evaluation of how mental health services are provided, it is critical to ensure that digitally infused systems of care, like the Digital Clinic, are effective, accessible, and scalable.
Asunto(s)
Intervención basada en la Internet , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Aplicaciones Móviles , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Teléfono Inteligente , Telemedicina , COVID-19 , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Pacientes Ambulatorios/psicologíaRESUMEN
Mental disorders (including substance use disorders, dementia, and self-harm) account for a substantial burden of disease and economic costs in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet they attract little funding. External resources are urgently needed but evidence on investments is scarce. This Health Policy paper uses 35 elite interviews and documentary analyses to examine how and why external organisations have invested in mental health in LMICs over the past three decades, and how this investment has changed over time. Four levels are examined: organisations, source countries, recipient countries, and global landscape. Organisations have invested in numerous internal and external activities. Among the various factors shaping organisational decisions, actors (ie, individuals and organisations concerned with mental health) were the most salient at all four levels. To increase external organisation investments in mental health in LMICs, organisational leadership and understanding are crucial, along with increased political support in source and recipient countries, and a stronger governance structure at the global level.
Asunto(s)
Política de Salud , Recursos en Salud/economía , Cooperación Internacional , Servicios de Salud Mental , Motivación , Países en Desarrollo , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/economía , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Pobreza , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
Objectives: The Psychology Task Force of the Medical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) has been charged with taking steps to improve global mental health care for people with epilepsy. This study aimed to inform the direction and priorities of the Task Force by examining epilepsy healthcare providers' current practical experiences, barriers, and unmet needs around addressing depression and anxiety in their patients. Methods: A voluntary 27-item online survey was distributed via ILAE chapters and networks. It assessed practices in the areas of screening, referral, management, and psychological care for depression and anxiety. A total of 445 participants, from 67 countries (68% high income), commenced the survey, with 87% completing all components. Most respondents (80%) were either neurologists or epileptologists. Results: Less than half of respondents felt adequately resourced to manage depression and anxiety. There was a lack of consensus about which health professionals were responsible for screening and management of these comorbidities. About a third only assessed for depression and anxiety following spontaneous report and lack of time was a common barrier (>50%). Routine referrals to psychiatrists (>55%) and psychologists (>41%) were common, but approximately one third relied on watchful waiting. A lack of both trained mental health specialists (>55%) and standardized procedures (>38%) was common barriers to referral practices. The majority (>75%) of respondents' patients identified with depression or anxiety had previously accessed psychotropic medications or psychological treatments. However, multiple barriers to psychological treatments were endorsed, including accessibility difficulties (52%). Significance: The findings suggest that while the importance of managing depression and anxiety in patients with epilepsy is being recognized, there are ongoing barriers to effective mental health care. Key future directions include the need for updated protocols in this area and the integration of mental health professionals within epilepsy settings.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Depresión/diagnóstico , Epilepsia/complicaciones , Salud Global , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo , Comités Consultivos , Humanos , Internet , Estudios Longitudinales , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Neurólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosAsunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Poblaciones Vulnerables/psicología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , Comorbilidad/tendencias , Refugio de Emergencia/economía , Refugio de Emergencia/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Los Angeles/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In order to reduce distress associated with working with COVID-19 patients, several psychological intervention programmes for healthcare workers have been developed in Spain. We aimed to describe the main characteristics and components of these programmes for healthcare workers treating COVID-19 patients in Spanish hospitals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was designed to evaluate the main characteristics of psychological intervention programmes for healthcare workers during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Valid responses were received from 36 hospitals. Most of these programmes offered both in-person and online therapy. The most common aim of these interventions was emotional regulation, which was treated by psychoeducational and cognitive-behavioural techniques in individual interventions. Group interventions mainly used psychoeducation and mindfulness. Only half of the teams that offered in-person interventions received training in the proper use of personal protective equipment. CONCLUSIONS: Several hospitals in Spain have developed mental health interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, deploying a wide range of therapeutic modalities and techniques. The rapid implementation of these programmes during the pandemic suggests that safety may not have received sufficient attention. The planning and development of interventions for healthcare workers during pandemics merits greater attention by national and regional authorities and institutions.