[THE STATE OF HEPATIC AND SPLANCHNIC BLOOD FLOW IN VARIOUS TYPES OF COMPLICATED PANCREATIC PSEUDOCYSTS].

Investigations were conducted in 37 patients, suffering complicated pancreatic pseudocysts. In accordance to data of ultrasound Doppler flowmetry for the blood flow along portal vein, a. hepatis communis, a. mesenterica superior in complicated pancreatic pseudocysts compensatory--adaptive reactions on level of hepatic--spanchnic blood flow are directed towards restriction of the blood inflow through the portal vein system. This is accompanied by the common peripheral vascular resistence raising in basin of a. mesenterica superior, which have depended upon the patients' state severity, caused by reduction of the volume blood flow in a certan vascular collector. The oxygen debt of the liver in these patients is compensated by the volume blood flow enhancement along a. hepatis communis.

Classification and Management of Pancreatic Pseudocysts.

This article aims to elucidate the classification of and optimal treatment for pancreatic pseudocysts. Various approaches, including endoscopic drainage, percutaneous drainage, and open surgery, have been employed for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts. However, no scientific classification of pancreatic pseudocysts has been devised, which could assist in the selection of optimal therapy. We evaluated the treatment modalities used in 893 patients diagnosed with pancreatic pseudocysts according to the revision of the Atlanta classification in our department between 2001 and 2010. All the pancreatic pseudocysts have course of disease >4 weeks and have mature cysts wall detected by computed tomography or transabdominal ultrasonography. Endoscopic drainage, percutaneous drainage, or open surgery was selected on the basis of the pseudocyst characteristics. Clinical data and patient outcomes were reviewed. Among the 893 patients, 13 (1.5%) had percutaneous drainage. Eighty-three (9%) had type I pancreatic pseudocysts and were treated with observation. Ten patients (1%) had type II pseudocysts and underwent the Whipple procedure or resection of the pancreatic body and tail. Forty-six patients (5.2%) had type III pseudocysts: 44 (4.9%) underwent surgical internal drainage and 2 (0.2%) underwent endoscopic drainage. Five hundred six patients (56.7%) had type IV pseudocysts: 297 (33.3%) underwent surgical internal drainage and 209 (23.4%) underwent endoscopic drainage. Finally, 235 patients (26.3%) had type V pseudocysts: 36 (4%) underwent distal pancreatectomy or splenectomy and 199 (22.3%) underwent endoscopic drainage. A new classification system was devised, based on the size, anatomical location, and clinical manifestations of the pancreatic pseudocyst along with the relationship between the pseudocyst and the pancreatic duct. Different therapeutic strategies could be considered based on this classification. When clinically feasible, endoscopic drainage should be considered the optimal management strategy for pancreatic pseudocysts.

[Pancreatic pseudocyst. Case report and literature review]. / Pseudoquiste pancreático. Revisión y reporte de caso.

BACKGROUND: The most frequent etiology of pancreatic pseudocyst is acute pancreatitis and exacerbations of chronic pancreatitis, presenting spontaneous resolution in 50% of the cases. Treatment is indicated in symptomatic or complicated persistent pseudocysts. The OBJECTIVE of this article is to present a case and management options of pancreatic pseudocyst defined as a collection of fluid in the omental bursa. CLINICAL CASE: We present the case of a 59-year-old female patient with a history of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and necrotizing pancreatitis. She presented abdominal pain, early satiety, and nausea during the previous 2 months. Presence of pancreatic pseudocysts of 92 and 62 mm was demonstrated by computed tomography. The patient was submitted to a laparoscopic cyst-gastric anastomosis. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cyst-gastric anastomosis is the ideal treatment for pancreatic pseudocyst management because it offers continuous drainage, low rate of recurrence and few complications, exceeding the RESULTS of endoscopic management and imaging-guided drainage along with the benefits of a minimally invasive procedure.

ANTECEDENTES: la etiología más frecuente del quiste pancreático es la pancreatitis aguda y las agudizaciones de pancreatitis crónica; el 50% de los casos se alivia espontáneamente. El tratamiento se indica en pseudoquistes persistentes, sintomáticos o complicados. OBJETIVO: comunicar un caso y las opciones de tratamiento del pseudoquiste pancreático, definido como una colección de líquido en la transcavidad de los epiplones. Caso clínico: paciente femenina de 59 años de edad, con ANTECEDENTES de colecistectomía laparoscópica, pancreatitis necrotizante y en los últimos dos meses dolor abdominal, saciedad temprana y náuseas. La tomografía reveló un pseudoquiste pancreático de 92 y 62 mm, razón por la que se efectuó una cistogastroanastomosis laparoscópica. CONCLUSIONES: la cistograstroanastomosis laparoscópica es el tratamiento ideal para el tratamiento del pseudoquiste pancreático porque ofrece: drenaje continuo, bajo índice de recidiva y pocas complicaciones que superan al tratamiento endoscópico y al drenaje guiado por imagenología, junto con las ventajas de mínima invasión.

S3 guideline for chronic pancreatitis - diagnosis, classification and therapy for the radiologist.

UNLABELLED: Chronic pancreatitis shows an increasing prevalence and incidence mainly in the Western Hemisphere. Early diagnosis and therapy are frequently delayed because of non-specific symptoms as well as non-specific blood values. The German Society of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS) organized the preparation and publication of an interdisciplinary S3 level guideline with the support of the German Radiological Society (DRG) as 1 of 11 contributing societies. In this article we present and discuss the main topics of the guideline regarding the diagnosis, differential diagnosis and therapy of complications of this complex chronic disease with a focus on clinical and scientific radiologists. KEY POINTS: • Ultarsound represents the perfect first line imaging modality • For further diagnostic werk up MRI with MRCP are recommended for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer • For clinical studies the modified (CT, MRI) Cambridge classification is recommended.

Commercial molecular panels are of limited utility in the classification of pancreatic cystic lesions.

The PathfinderTG biomarker panel is useful in the evaluation of pancreatic cysts that have clinical features suspicious for malignancy, but its utility in classifying fine-needle aspiration biopsies from small pancreatic cystic lesions is yet to be proven. We used morphology to classify 20 pancreatic cyst cytology aspirates, all of which met radiographic criteria for close observation. Cases were cytologically classified as consistent with pseudocyst, serous cystadenoma, or mucinous neoplasm with low-grade, intermediate-grade, or high-grade dysplasia and analyzed for carcinoembryonic antigen. Redpath Integrated Pathology Inc. rendered diagnoses of nonmucinous (reactive/indolent or serous) or mucinous (low-risk or at risk) cyst on the basis of results of the PathfinderTG panel (KRAS mutations, DNA content, and loss of heterozygosity at microsatellites linked to tumor suppressor genes). Cytologic and commercial laboratory diagnoses were concordant in only 7 (35%) cases. Seven cysts classified as mucinous with low-grade dysplasia by cytology were interpreted as nonmucinous on the basis of the PathfinderTG panel, 2 of which were resected mucinous cysts. Two pancreatitis-related pseudocysts were misdiagnosed as low-risk mucinous cysts; 1 mucinous cyst with low-grade dysplasia was considered at risk for neoplastic progression using the PathfinderTG panel. Only 1 cyst misclassified as pseudocyst by cytology, but low-risk mucinous cyst by molecular analysis, proved to be a mucinous cystic neoplasm with low-grade dysplasia after surgical resection. We conclude that the PathfinderTG panel may aid the classification of pancreatic lesions, but is often inaccurate and should not replace cytologic evaluation of these lesions.

The revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: a CT imaging guide for radiologists.

Accurate diagnosis and description of the various findings in acute pancreatitis is important for treatment. The original Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis sought to create a uniform system for classifying the severity of acute pancreatitis as well as common language to describe the various events that can occur in acute pancreatitis. The goal was to allow accurate communication between physicians using standardized language so correct treatment options could be used. Since that time, advances in the understanding of acute pancreatitis as well as improvements in both interventions and imaging have led to criticisms of the system and its abandonment by physicians. A 2007 revision of the Atlanta classifications sought to address many of these issues. This article will explain the changes to the Atlanta classification system and provide pictorial examples of the findings in acute pancreatitis as described by the Atlanta classification system.

[New classification of acute pancreatitis]. / Ny klassifikation af pancreatitis acuta.

The course of acute pancreatitis is in the initial phase dominated by a systemic inflammatory response, later by local complications. A new classification defines three specific types of pancreatitis: 1) interstitial oedematous pancreatitis and 2) necrotizing pancreatitis with pancreatic parenchymal necrosis, or 3) peripancreatic necrosis alone. The classification also defines four types of collections: 1) Acute peripancreatic fluid collection, 2) pseudocyst, 3) acute post-necrotic collection, and 4) walled-off necrosis. This article summarizes the terminology of the revised Atlanta classification.

Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis.

Pancreatic pseudocysts are a well-known complication of acute or chronic pancreatitis, with a higher incidence in the latter. Diagnosis is accomplished most often by computed tomographic scanning, by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, or by ultrasound, and a rapid progress in the improvement of diagnostic tools enables detection with high sensitivity and specificity. Different strategies contribute to the treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts: endoscopic transpapillary or transmural drainage, percutaneous catheter drainage, or open surgery. The feasibility of endoscopic drainage is highly dependent on the anatomy and topography of the pseudocyst, but provides high success and low complication rates. Percutaneous drainage is used for infected pseudocysts. However, its usefulness in chronic pancreatitis-associated pseudocysts is questionable. Internal drainage and pseudocyst resection are frequently used as surgical approaches with a good overall outcome, but a somewhat higher morbidity and mortality compared with endoscopic intervention. We therefore conclude that pseudocyst treatment in chronic pancreatitis can be effectively achieved by both endoscopic and surgical means. This review entails publications referring to the classification of pancreatic pseudocysts, epidemiology, diagnostic tools, and therapeutic options for pancreatic pseudocysts. Only full articles were considered for the review. Based on a search in PubMed, the MeSH terms "pancreatic pseudocysts and classification," "diagnosis," and "endoscopic, percutaneous, and surgical treatment" were used either alone or in combination.

Cystic lesions of the pancreas.

Although cystic tumors of the pancreas are relatively rare, they constitute an increasingly important category. Advances in imaging and interventional techniques and the sharp drop in the mortality rate of pancreatic surgery have rendered pancreatic biopsies and resections commonplace specimens. Consequently, in the past two decades, the nature of many cystic tumors in this organ has been better characterized. The names of some existing entities were revised; for example, what was known as papillary-cystic tumor is now regarded as solid-pseudopapillary tumor. New entities, in particular, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and its variants, such as oncocytic and intestinal subtypes were recognized. The importance of clinical and pathologic correlation in the evaluation of these lesions was appreciated, in particular, with regards to the multifocality of these lesions, their association with invasive carcinomas, and thus their 'preinvasive' nature. Consensus criteria for the distinction of these from the ordinary precursors of adenocarcinoma, the pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, were established. The definition of mucinous cystic neoplasms was refined; ovarian-like stroma has now become almost a requirement for the diagnosis of mucinous cystic neoplasia, and defined as such, the propensity of these tumors to occur in perimenopausal women became even more striking. The validity and clinical value of classifying the pancreatic cysts of mucinous type as adenoma, borderline, CIS and invasive have been established. Related to this, the importance of thorough sampling in accurate classification of these mucinous lesions was recognized. Greater accessibility of the pancreas afforded by improved invasive as well as noninvasive modalities has also increased the detection of otherwise clinically silent cystic tumors, which has led to the recognition of more innocuous entities such as acinar cell cystadenoma and squamoid cyst of pancreatic ducts. As the significance of the cystic lesions emerged, cystic forms of otherwise typically solid tumors were also better characterized. Thus, significant developments have taken place in the classification and our understanding of pancreatic cystic tumors in the past few years, and experience with these lesions is likely to grow exponentially in the coming years.

Pancreatic pseudocysts.

Improvements in imaging studies and a better understanding of the natural history of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) have allowed the different types to be clarified. Stratification of PFCs into subgroups should help in selecting from the increasing current available treatment options, which include percutaneous, endoscopic and surgical drainage. Percutaneous catheter drainage is safe and effective and should be the treatment of choice in poor-risk patients, and for infected pseudocysts related to acute pancreatitis. Endoscopic drainage should be the first management option in suitable pseudocysts related to chronic pancreatitis, if the necessary expertise is available. The high success rate and current low morbidity of elective open surgery mean that it is still the standard of management in this disease. Laparoscopic approaches are gaining favour, predominantly in drainage of collections in the lesser sac, and long-term data are awaited. The precise application of this modality will need to be critically compared with the low morbidity of mini-laparotomy, which is the current standard after non-operative treatment fails in these patients. It is essential to clearly stratify the different types of pancreatic pseudocysts, in particular with relation to acute or chronic pancreatitis, and perform a valid comparison of the different treatment modalities within groups. In this capacity a precise and transparent classification may provide valuable answers, in particular relating to optimal management according to pseudocyst type.

Treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts.

According to the Atlanta classification an acute pseudocyst is a collection of pancreatic juice enclosed by a wall of fibrous or granulation tissue, which arises as a consequence of acute pancreatitis or pancreatic trauma, whereas a chronic pseudocyst is a collection of pancreatic juice enclosed by a wall of fibrous or granulation tissue, which arises as a consequence of chronic pancreatitis and lack an antecedent episode of acute pancreatitis. It is generally agreed that acute and chronic pseudocysts have a different natural history, though many reports do not differentiate between pseudocysts that complicate acute pancreatitis and those that complicate chronic disease. Observation--"conservative treatment"--of a patient with a pseudocyst is preponderantly based on the knowledge that spontaneous resolution can occur. It must, however, be admitted that there is substantial risk of complications or even death; first of all due to bleeding. There are no randomized studies for the management protocols for pancreatic pseudocysts. Therefore, today we have to rely on best clinical practice, but still certain advice may be given. First of all it is important to differentiate acute from chronic pseudocysts for management, but at the same time not miss cystic neoplasias. Conservative treatment should always be considered the first option (pseudocysts should not be treated just because they are there). However, if intervention is needed, a procedure that is well known should always be considered first. The results of percutaneous or endoscopic drainage are probably more dependent on the experience of the interventionist than the choice of procedure and if surgery is needed, an intern anastomosis can hold sutures not until several weeks (if possible 6 weeks).

Treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts in line with D'Egidio's classification.

AIM: To explore the implications of underlying diseases in treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPC). METHODS: Clinical data of 73 cases of pancreatic pseudocyst treated in a 12-year period were reviewed comprehensively. Pancreatic pseudocysts were classified according to the etiological criteria proposed by D'Egidio. The correlation between the etiological classification, measure of treatment and clinical outcome of the patients was analyzed. RESULTS: According to the etiological criteria proposed by D'Egidio, 73 patients were divided into three groups. Group I was comprised of 37 patients with type I pseudocyst, percutaneous drainage was successful in the majority (9/11, 82%) while external or internal drainage was not satisfactory with a low success rate (8/16, 50%). Group II was comprised of 24 patients with type II pseudocyst, and internal drainage was curative for most of the cases (11/12, 92%), but the success rate of percutaneous or external drainage was unacceptably low (4/9, 44%). Group III consisted of 12 patients with type III pseudocyst. Internal drainage or pancreatic resection performed in 10 of these patients produced a curative rate of 80% (8/10) with the correction of the ductal pathology as a prerequisite. CONCLUSION: The classification of pancreatic pseudocyst based on its underlying diseases is meaningful for its management. Awareness of the underlying diseases of pancreatic pseudocyst and detection of the ductal pathology in type II and III pancreatic pseudocysts with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography may help make better decisions of treatment to reduce the rate of complications and recurrence.

[Pancreatic pseudocysts--possibilities in surgical therapy]. / Pankreaspseudozysten-chirurgische Therapiemöglichkeiten.

Based on the classification of pseudocysts according to D'Egidio and Schein the different surgical techniques for the treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts, i.e. drainage procedures and resections are discussed. The role of laparoscopic techniques is demonstrated. The "competing" endoscopic and interventional techniques are mentioned. The prognosis of the patients after operations for pancreatic pseudocysts is to a smaller degree depending on the operating technique, but largely on the natural history of the disease and the discontinuation or continuation of the underlying pathogen.

Main pancreatic ductal anatomy can direct choice of modality for treating pancreatic pseudocysts (surgery versus percutaneous drainage).

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that pancreatic ductal anatomy may predict the likely success of percutaneous drainage of pseudocysts of the pancreas. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Various modalities are currently applied to pseudocysts, with little or no data to aid in the choice of management strategy. Pancreatic ductal anatomy was assessed and a system to categorize ductal changes was established. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic pseudocyst were evaluated from 1985 to 2000. Two hundred fifty-three patients have been included in this series. Pancreatic ductal anatomy was defined using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and categorized as a normal duct, a stricture, or complete cut-off of the pancreatic duct. Communication between the duct and cyst was noted. RESULTS: Among the 253 patients, 68 (27%) had spontaneous resolution. Fifty of the remaining 185 had percutaneous drainage and 148 (13 of whom failed to respond to percutaneous drainage) had surgery. There were no deaths in either group. Mean length of time with catheter drainage among all percutaneous drainage patients was 79.2 +/- 19.6 days. Patients with normal pancreatic ducts and those with strictures but no communication between the duct and the cyst who had percutaneous drainage had a much shorter length of hospital stay (6.1 +/- 4.6 days) than patients with strictures and duct-cyst communication and patients with complete cut-off of the duct (33.5 +/- 5.2 days and 39.1 +/- 7.9 days, respectively). Length of drainage also correlated with ductal anatomy. All patients with chronic pancreatitis failed to respond to percutaneous drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic ductal anatomy provides a clear correlation with the failure and successes of pseudocysts managed by percutaneous drainage as well as predicting the total length of drainage. Percutaneous drainage is best applied to patients with normal ducts and is acceptably applied to patients with stricture but no cyst-duct communication.

An overview of pancreatic pseudocysts: the emperor's new clothes revisited.

The diminished role of surgery and increased role of nonoperative interventional therapy for pancreatic pseudocysts is discussed. The natural history supports prolonged observation for most asymptomatic pseudocysts.

[The percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts]. / Drenaggio percutaneo delle pseudocisti pancreatiche.

Pancreatic pseudocysts (PP) may be classified into: 1. Post-necrotic PP produced by an attack of acute pancreatitis on a normal pancreas; 2. Post-necrotic PP produced by an attack of acute pancreatitis superimposed on a chronic pancreatitis; 3. Chronic pancreatitis PP ("retention cysts"); 4. Post-operative PP. The differential diagnosis between inflammatory and neoplastic lesions must be pursued both at the initial diagnostic work-up and during the post-treatment follow-up. Every lesion of uncertain etiology must be resected. Percutaneous drainage (PD) is one of the therapeutical options currently available for PP and it is indicated for: 1. Post-necrotic PP produced by an attack of acute pancreatitis (either on a normal pancreas or on a chronic pancreatitis), large (> 6 cm), rapidly expanding or symptomatic; 2. Post-operative PP. PD may also be indicated for a small, highly selected, group of chronic pancreatitis PP symptomatic but without critical duct stenoses. In these patients a PD, often therapeutic, may also be employed to decompress a "retention cyst" in order to improve patients' general conditions before surgery. Post-necrotic PP that are asymptomatic or small (< 6 cm) should be managed non-operatively. The majority of chronic pancreatitis PP, all those with a clearly enlarged pancreatic duct or associated with other conditions not amenable to percutaneous resolution, require surgery. In our experience PD was feasible in all but one case (95/96). The initial diagnosis of PP was confirmed in 92 cases. The overall morbidity was 18% with no specific mortality. Overall 3-year success rate was 85% with well evident variations among different PP types.

Management of fluid collections and necrosis in acute pancreatitis.

According to the Atlanta classification, the most widely accepted clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis, four pathologic entities of fluid collections and necrosis are recognized. Acute fluid collections occur early as an exudative reaction to the pancreatic inflammation, have no fibrous wall, and resolve spontaneously. Pancreatic necrosis, the most severe form of acute pancreatitis, is diagnosed on dynamic contrast-enhanced computerized tomography and requires early aggressive cardiorespiratory resuscitation, nutritional support, and appropriate systemic antibiotics to prevent superinfection. Development of infection (infected necrosis) is the indication for operative debridement, preferably as late in the course of the disease as possible. Acute pseudocysts are collections of pancreatic, enzyme-rich fluid caused by pancreatic ductal disruption that occur 3 to 6 weeks after onset of acute pancreatitis and have a well-defined, nonepithelial fibrous wall. If communication with the ductal system is present, internal enteric drainage (either operative or endoscopic) is more effective; if communication is not present, the pseudocysts are amenable to percutaneous drainage. A pancreatic abscess is an infected, circumscribed peripancreatic collection, associated with minimal or no parenchymal necrosis, that occurs late (4 to 6 weeks) after onset of severe pancreatitis and may represent an infected pseudocyst; percutaneous drainage is the treatment of choice.

[The classification of cystic lesions of the pancreas]. / Do pytannia klasyfikatsiï kistoznykh urazhen' pidshlunkovoï zalozy.

The paper focuses on different classifications of cystic affections of the pancreas. The most simplified classification is proposed to be used in routine practice, which facilitates clinical recognition and permits the selection of optimum, in the first place, surgical, tactics.