No test medical abortion - a review of the evidence on selective use of preabortion testing.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The last decade has seen a cascade of different telemedicine models for medical abortion (MA) being tested and implemented. Among these service delivery models is the 'no-test' MA model, in which care is provided remotely and eligibility for the MA is based on history alone. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the existing evidence for no-test MA. RECENT FINDINGS: The evidence base for no-test MA relies heavily on cohort and noncomparative studies predominantly from high resource settings. Recent findings indicate that no-test MA is safe, effective, and highly acceptable. Diagnoses of ectopic pregnancy and underestimation of gestational age were rare. Identified advantages included shortening time to access MA and mitigating access barriers such as cost, and geographical barriers. Abortion seekers valued omitting the ultrasound citing reasons such as privacy concerns, costs, more flexibility, and control. The impacts of no-test MA on unscheduled postabortion contacts and visits and on contraceptive use were unclear due to limited evidence. SUMMARY: No-test MA can be provided to complement other care pathways including those with some or no in-person care. Further research is needed to allow for widespread adoption of no-test MA and scale-up in a variety of contexts, including low-resource settings.

Prior knowledge and experience with self-managed abortion among people seeking abortion care in US Midwestern states.

OBJECTIVES: This study seeks to understand what methods people use and/or have heard of others using for self-managed abortion (SMA) prior to coming to a health facility for abortion care. STUDY DESIGN: We collected survey data on sociodemographics, gestational stage, and SMA awareness and methods from patients seeking care in 17 abortion facilities in Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, and Illinois from April 2020 to April 2022. We used descriptive statistics to examine the proportion of participants who had attempted SMA and, separately, who had heard of people attempting SMA. RESULTS: In total, 71 respondents (4.2%) had attempted SMA, and 416 (25.5%) had heard of others attempting SMA. The most frequently attempted methods for self-management were taking herbs and/or vitamins (31% each) or hitting oneself/being hit (22.5%). About a third of those who tried SMA reported trying more than one method (30%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that people who attempt SMA are committed to self-managing their abortion. More research is needed to better understand sociodemographic characteristics of people who have attempted or heard of people attempting SMA research.

Deaths among Women of Reproductive Age: an Explorative Case Study among Abortion Seekers.

In Nepal, abortion was legalized in 2002. Yet many women are denied abortion services. Women denied abortion services may either continue their pregnancies or find abortion care elsewhere. However, what is not known is the consequences on women, and their children after accessing abortion services or after being denied abortion services. This comment aims to understand the cause of death of women who sought abortion services between 2019 and 2020 and were enrolled in a longitudinal nationwide study of the consequences of legal abortion access in Nepal. Women were interviewed 6 weeks and every 6 months for 3 years after seeking abortion. During the follow-up interviews, the field research assistants were informed about the death of the clients. Once the death was reported, a trained senior research staff visited the deceased persons house and interviewed family members including husbands, maternal parents or in-laws to explore the cause of death. A total of nine deaths were reported between April 2019 and December 2022. Out of nine deceased women, four received abortions while five of them were initially denial abortion services. The majority of the deaths were due to suicide followed by tuberculosis. None of the deaths were caused by abortion or birth. Keywords: Death; Nepal; reproductive ages; womens health.

Abortion needs expressed on Reddit after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision in the United States.

CONTEXT: Women, transgender men, and gender non-binary individuals facing unwanted pregnancy use online resources for abortion information. We sought to determine the informational and emotional needs that those seeking abortion information on Reddit expressed immediately following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs) decision in the United States. Furthermore, we aimed to understand how the Reddit community addressed these needs. METHODS: We collected posts on Reddit in the subreddit r/abortion that expressed informational or emotional needs related to the Dobbs decision created between June 24, 2022 and July 24, 2022. We identified posts using keywords including "roe," "rvw," and "trigger law" and then manually reviewed them to ensure relevance. We analyzed posts and their comments using qualitative descriptive analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and ten posts met inclusion criteria. Original posters expressed needs for legal and medical information. Posters also expressed need for logistical support, including help accessing medication abortion, traveling out of state, and financing abortion care, and emotional support in general and resulting from fear of parental disapproval and shame relating to abortion stigma. Although responders to these comments addressed these needs by offering general support, accurate information, and reliable resources, intersecting and emotional needs sometimes went unaddressed. CONCLUSION: The Dobbs decision caused confusion and panic among abortion seekers requesting guidance on r/abortion, resulting in informational and emotional needs. While the r/abortion community actively addressed needs, inherent limitations of an online forum prevented some original posters from receiving the multifaceted support they needed.

How TikTok is being used to talk about abortion post-Roe: A content analysis of the most liked abortion TikToks.

OBJECTIVES: Access to information about abortion is essential for ensuring reproductive autonomy, particularly post-Roe. TikTok, a popular video-sharing application, may be a source of information about abortion, yet little is known about the tone and content of such videos. To fill this gap, we analyze the most liked abortion videos on TikTok three months following the U.S. Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. STUDY DESIGN: We downloaded the top 200 most liked, publicly available TikTok videos when searching "abortion" on September 26, 2022 and recorded and summarized key video characteristics. We then qualitatively analyzed for content, tone, and common themes. RESULTS: The top 200 most liked TikTok videos collectively had approximately 164 million likes, nearly 10 million shares, and 4 million comments. Most videos expressed support for abortion and presented information that was political or personal in nature. Only two videos contained health information about obtaining or completing an abortion, and only five videos featured or were created by a medical provider. CONCLUSIONS: Findings reveal the far reach of TikTok, which underscores the importance of analyzing online sources of information about abortion. However, our mixed-methods analysis indicates that the most liked TikToks are a source of abortion news, political opinion, personal stories, and debate rather than a source of health information for abortion seekers. IMPLICATIONS: Our analysis finds that the top 200 most liked TikTok videos three months post-Dobbs are primarily political in nature. Relatively few videos provided practical information about accessing abortion care, presenting an opportunity for healthcare providers, public health advocates, and activists to improve access and awareness of new pathways to care. The most popular TikTok videos appear to disseminate news and political information rather than health information about abortion.

Abortion stigma among abortion seekers, healthcare professionals and the public in high-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Abortion is a crucial sexual and reproductive right. However, the legal situation of pregnancy termination is rather heterogeneous across countries and regions. The political climate and cultural perception may result in abortion-related stigma. This mixed-methods systematic review protocol aims to detail the proposed methods for assessing the current state of research on abortion stigma in high-income countries from an abortion seeker, healthcare provider and public perspective. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols guideline, we conducted a systematic literature search of peer-reviewed studies from high-income countries in relevant electronic databases: PubMed, CINHAL, PsycINFO, LIVIVO and Cochrane Library. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method studies that measured or examined abortion-related stigma in abortion seekers, healthcare professionals and the general public will be included. Assessment of risk of bias, data synthesis and qualitative meta-aggregation will be carried out. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of the systematic review will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences.

Interrupciones voluntarias de embarazos en un Hospital Universitario de Uruguay: reporte de situación 2019-2020 / Voluntary interruption of pregnancies at the University Hospital of Uruguay: situation report 2019-2020 / Interrupções voluntárias de gravidez no Hospital Universitário de Uruguay: relatório de situação 2019-2020

Objetivo: el objetivo de este estudio es conocer el estado de situación de los procesos de las usuarias que asistieron a la policlínica de interrupción voluntaria del embarazo en el Hospital de Clínicas en un período de agosto de 2019 a agosto de 2020. Metodología y materiales: estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo, a partir de la entrevista clínica de salud mental y una ficha de uso interno utilizada para relevar el proceso de toma de decisión. En muestra de 78 usuarias se analizan variables sociodemográficas, ginecoobstétricas y asociadas al proceso de interrupción, antecedentes psicológicos y/o psiquiátricos y motivos de interrupción. Resultados: el promedio de edad es de 25 años, la mayoría en pareja y ciclo básico educativo finalizado. El promedio de edad gestacional fue de 7,36 semanas. El 81% de las mujeres no había realizado un IVE. Un 65.4% de las mujeres no tienen antecedentes psicológicos y/o psiquiátricos. No existe relación significativa entre haber realizado un IVE previamente y tener antecedentes psicológicos y/o psiquiátricos.Utilizaban anticonceptivos 78.2%. Conclusiones: la interrupción del embarazo supone una situación vital estresante para quienes la transitan, se encuentran atravesadas por múltiples motivos que inciden en la toma de decisión de interrumpir. Se infiere que la realización de uno o más procedimientos de IVE no necesariamente está relacionada con tener un antecedente psicopatológico o cursar una psicopatología al realizar el proceso. Es pertinente promover la atención focalizada en las pacientes, integrando la perspectiva de género y derechos humanos, mejorar los procesos de atención, asesoramiento en salud mental, sexual y reproductiva de las usuarias y sus acompañantes.

Objective: The objective of this study is to know the status of the processes of the users who attended the polyclinic for voluntary termination of pregnancy at the Hospital de Clínicas in a period from August 2019 to August 2020. Methodology and materials: The study used descriptive and retrospective methods based on interviews with mental health professionals and a form that was used to ask about how people make decisions. In a sample of 78 users, sociodemographic, obstetric and gynecological variables associated with the discontinuation process, psychological and/or psychiatric history and reasons for discontinuation were analyzed. Results: The average age is 25 years, most people are married and have finished their elementary education. The average gestational age was 7.36 weeks. 81% of the women had not undergone an IVE. 65.4% of women have no psychological and/or psychiatric history. There is no significant relationship between having previously performed an IVE and having a psychological and/or psychiatric history. 78.2% used contraceptives. Conclusions: The interruption of pregnancy is a stressful life situation for those who go through it; they are faced with multiple reasons that influence the decision to terminate. It is inferred that carrying out one or more IVE procedures is not necessarily related to having a psychopathological history or experiencing psychopathology when carrying out the process. It is pertinent to promote patient-focused care, integrating the gender and human rights perspective, improve care processes, and provide advice on mental, sexual, and reproductive health of users and their companions.

Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo é conhecer a situação dos processos das usuárias que compareceram à policlínica de interrupção voluntária da gravidez do Hospital de Clínicas no período de agosto de 2019 a agosto de 2020. Metodologia e materiais: estudo descritivo e retrospectivo, baseado na entrevista clínica de saúde mental e em formulário de uso interno utilizado para levantamento do processo de tomada de decisão. Numa amostra de 78 usuárias foram analisadas variáveis ​​sociodemográficas, obstétricas e ginecológicas associadas ao processo de descontinuação, histórico psicológico e/ou psiquiátrico e motivos de descontinuação. Resultados: a idade média é de 25 anos, a maioria vive em casal e completou o ciclo educativo básico. A idade gestacional média foi de 7,36 semanas. 81% das mulheres não realizaram IVE. 65,4% das mulheres não têm antecedentes psicológicos e/ou psiquiátricos. Não há relação significativa entre ter realizado EIV anteriormente e ter antecedentes psicológicos e/ou psiquiátricos, 78,2% faziam uso de anticoncepcional. Conclusões: a interrupção da gravidez é uma situação estressante de vida para quem passa por ela, pois se deparam com múltiplos motivos que influenciam na decisão de interrompê-la. Infere-se que a realização de um ou mais procedimentos de IVE não está necessariamente relacionada a ter histórico psicopatológico, ou vivenciar psicopatologia na realização do processo. É pertinente promover cuidados centrados no paciente, integrando a perspectiva de gênero e direitos humanos, melhorar os processos de cuidados e aconselhamento sobre saúde mental, sexual e reprodutiva dos utentes e dos seus acompanhantes.

Typologies of interactions between abortion seekers and healthcare workers in Australia: a qualitative study exploring the impact of stigma on quality of care.

BACKGROUND: Abortion stigma involves the stereotyping of, discrimination against, and delegitimization of those who seek and provide abortion. Experiences of abortion care are shaped by stigma at the meso (e.g., lack of local providers) and macro (e.g., abortion regulations) levels. Yet abortion stigma and quality of care are often examined separately. This study sought to articulate the impact of abortion stigma on quality of care in the context of healthcare interactions. It did so by characterizing the features of stigmatizing and non-stigmatizing care in the context of macro-level stigma and other structural factors that influence abortion-seeking experiences, including the coronavirus pandemic's influence on the health system. METHODS: This qualitative study comprised in-depth interviews with people who sought abortion across Australia between March 2020 and November 2022, recruited through social media and flyers in clinics. Thematic analysis drew on concepts of micro, meso, and macro stigma and person-centered care. We developed typologies of the interactions between abortion seekers and healthcare workers by analytically grouping together negative and positive experiences to characterize features of stigmatizing and and non-stigmatizing care in the context of macro-level influences. RESULTS: We interviewed 24 abortion seekers and developed five typologies of stigmatizing care: creating barriers; judging; ignoring emotional and information needs; making assumptions; and minimizing interactions. There are five corresponding positive typologies. Macro-level factors, from abortion regulations to rural and pandemic-related health system pressures, contributed to poor experiences in care. CONCLUSIONS: The positive experiences in this study illustrate how a lack of stigma enables patient-centered care. The negative experiences reflect the interrelationship between stigmatizing beliefs among healthcare workers, macro-level (policy and regulatory) abortion stigma, and structural health service limitations exacerbated during the pandemic. Interventions are needed to reduce stigmatizing interactions between abortion seekers and healthcare workers, and should also consider macro-level factors that influence the behaviors of healthcare workers and experiences of abortion seekers. Without addressing stigma at multiple levels, equitable access to high-quality abortion care will be difficult to achieve. Efforts to integrate stigma reduction into quality improvement have relevance for maternal and reproductive health services globally.

The difficult process of autonomous choice: using I-poems to understand experiences of abortion-seekers in The Netherlands.

While key barriers to abortion care accessibility have been established, little is known about the experiences of people having abortions in the Netherlands. Stories of individual abortion-seekers can help counteract stereotyping, diminish abortion stigma, and improve accessibility. This study's research question is: What experiences do abortion-seekers in the Netherlands have with abortion care and what new insights can the I-poem method of analysis provide? This qualitative feminist study used transcripts of semi-structured, in-depth interviews with abortion-seekers from previous research to create I-poems. Using a grounded theory method, the I-poems were coded deductively to validate previous findings, and inductively to generate new insights. The I-poems revealed that although abortion-seekers felt autonomous, their decision-making was complicated by doubt concerning their partner's views and/or suitability as a parent, feelings of shame, and a lack of support. The abortion-seekers were often slowed by obstacles in policy and care; waiting caused feelings of fear and panic and routine pre-abortion ultrasounds led to anxiety. They often did not know what to expect from their body or the abortion procedure. I-poems show how autonomous choice in abortion care is socially constructed rather than purely individual. Abortion providers must pay special attention to external factors complicating the decision-making process such as partner discordance (even in stable relationships) and anxiety due to waiting times and routine pre-abortion ultrasound. Future action on normalisation of information provided on all aspects of choosing an abortion is necessary to realise informed choice and reduction of abortion stigma.Plain language summary Abortion is a medical procedure that ends a pregnancy. In some countries, people can easily get an abortion. In others, it is illegal or difficult to access. In the Netherlands, abortion is accessible and legal before 24 weeks of pregnancy and can be performed upon request of the abortion seeker. This policy is often seen as liberal, as it allows people to make their own decisions about their bodies. Still, abortion stigma is present in Dutch society. Stigma around abortion refers to negative attitudes and beliefs that society has towards people who have had abortions or are considering having one.Research by Holten et al7 looked at how easy it is for abortion seekers in the Netherlands to access abortion services. The study highlighted that people in the Netherlands still face barriers to accessing abortion services. For example: the law and regulations regarding abortions and the fact that people had difficulty in talking about their abortion due to stigma.The abovementioned study gives a broad view on challenges in the accessibility of abortion in the Netherlands, but the individual experiences are not portrayed.The goal of this study is to learn about the personal experiences of abortion-seekers in the Netherlands. It aims to understand what it's like for these people to access abortion services and what we can learn from their individual stories by using a method of analysis called I-poem. I-poems are a type of poem created by the researcher by looking for sentences using the first-person pronoun "I" in interview texts. I poems show the personal experience or point of view of the person interviewed. This type of poem is often used to express emotions or share personal stories or observations.This study used interviews with people who have had abortions to create I-poems. The grounded theory method was used to analyse the I-poems in two ways: confirming what was found in previous studies, and also providing new insights from the data.The study found that the people contemplating having an abortion had a hard time making the decision to have an abortion because they had doubts, were worried about what their partner would think, felt ashamed to talk about it with friends and family, and didn't have enough support. They also faced challenges like having to wait for the abortion because of clinic schedules and laws and getting ultrasounds before the procedure, which made them anxious. It was also found that the people contemplating abortion were unsure of what to expect from the abortion procedure and how their body would react, which made the decision even harder.The study concludes that even when people felt in control of their decision, the decision-making process was still difficult. The decision is not just personal, but is also affected by society, partners, and healthcare policies. The waiting time and the ultrasound before the abortion made the process harder, and abortion seekers were not aware of what to expect from the procedure. More information and education on all aspects of having an abortion should be provided to help people to make better informed decisions and reduce the abortion stigma. Further research on experiences of routine ultrasound before abortion in the Netherlands is needed to improve abortion care.

"I'm going to be forced to have a baby": A study of COVID-19 abortion experiences on Reddit.

INTRODUCTION: The initial stages of the COVID-19 pandemic affected abortion care in the United States (US) in myriad ways. While research has documented systems-level pandemic-related impacts on abortion access and care delivery little information exists about the experiences of abortion seekers during this period. We sought to document the effects of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions US abortion seekers by analyzing posts on Reddit, a popular social media website. METHODS: We compiled and coded 528 anonymous posts on the abortion subreddit from 3/20/2020 to 4/12/2020 and applied inductive qualitative analytic techniques to identify themes. RESULTS: We identified four primary themes. First, posters reported several COVID-19-related barriers to abortion services: reduced in-person access due to clinic closures, mail delivery delays of abortion medications, and pandemic-related financial barriers to both self-managed and in-clinic abortion. The second theme encompassed quarantine-driven privacy challenges, primarily challenges with concealing an abortion from household members. Third, posters detailed how the pandemic constrained their pregnancy decision making, including time pressure from impending clinic closures. Finally, posters reported COVID-19-related changes to service delivery that negatively affected their abortion experiences, for example being unable to bring a support person into the clinic due to pandemic visitor restrictions. DISCUSSION: This analysis of real-time social media posts reveals multiple ways that the COVID-19 pandemic limited abortion access in the US and affected abortion seekers' decisions and experiences. Findings shed light on the consequences of sudden changes, whether pandemic or policy related, on abortion service delivery.

"Am I the Only One Who Feels Like This?": Needs Expressed Online by Abortion Seekers.

In the United States, abortion is safe and common, but highly stigmatized and frequently targeted by legislation that aims to restrict access. Numerous obstacles impede access to abortion care, including logistical barriers like cost and transportation, limited clinic availability, and state-mandated waiting periods. Accurate abortion information can also be hard to access. To overcome these barriers, many people seeking abortion turn to anonymous online forums, including Reddit, for information and support. Examining this community provides a unique perspective on the questions, thoughts, and needs of people considering or undergoing an abortion. The authors web scraped 250 posts from subreddits that contain abortion-related posts, then coded deidentified posts using a combined deductive/inductive approach. The authors identified a subset of these codes in which users were giving/seeking information and advice on Reddit, then engaged in a targeted analysis of the needs expressed in these posts. Three interconnected needs emerged: (1) need for information, (2) need for emotional support, and (3) need for community around the abortion experience. In this study map the authors reflected these needs onto key social work practice areas and competencies; taken alongside support from social work's governing bodies, this research suggests that social workers would be beneficial additions to the abortion care workforce.

French women's experiences and opinions with in-country versus cross-border abortion travel: a mixed-methods paper.

OBJECTIVES: This is the first study contrasting the experience of women residing in France and travelling for abortion services inside and outside their country of residence. We compare travel reasons and costs as well as our study participants' opinions of abortion legislation. The article documents legal and procedural barriers related to accessing local and timely abortions and provides policy recommendations to broaden care options. METHODS: The study is based on a mixed-methods research design. Quantitative data were descriptively analysed using Stata and drawn from 100 surveys with in-country abortion seekers collected from 3 Parisian hospitals, and 57 surveys with French residents seeking abortion care in the Netherlands (42), Spain (10) and the UK (5). Qualitative data were thematically analysed using ATLAS.ti and drawn from 36 interviews with French residents (23 in-country abortion seekers and 13 cross-border abortion travellers). FINDINGS: Gestational age (GA) limits were the key reason for cross-border travel, while lack of close-by, timely and good quality abortion care was the main driver for in-country abortion travel. Unlike in-country travellers, cross-border abortion seekers faced significant financial costs and burdens related to such travel. Partners, family members and service providers offered important support structures to both cross-border and in-country travellers. CONCLUSIONS: Legal time limits appeared to be the key driver for abortion-related travel of French residents. Having passed or being at risk of exceeding the GA limit caused women to travel outside their country or department of residence for abortion care.

Transitar el laberinto: trayectorias de cuidado entre mujeres que deciden abortar en el Ecuador / Traversing the labyrinth: Trajectories of care among women who decide to have an abortion in Ecuador

El acercamiento a las experiencias de mujeres que decidieron abortar en Ecuador, a partir de sus relatos biográficos, nos permitió comprender las trayectorias de cuidado por las que debieron transitar. Se desarrolló una metodología cualitativa, con enfoque biográfico narrativo, con la participación de 19 mujeres mayores de edad, residentes en diferentes provincias del Ecuador, un territorio con medidas restrictivas sancionatorias legales y morales alrededor del aborto. Encontramos que los contextos socio biográficos de las participantes se caracterizaron por la presencia de múltiples formas de violencia; sus decisiones en salud sexual y reproductiva constituyen una carga moral que las responsabiliza y les impone una serie de mandatos sociales en medio de grandes limitaciones y restricciones; sus trayectorias y búsqueda de cuidados se caracterizan por un Estado ausente como garante, lo que las lleva resguardarse en sí mismas o en algunas mujeres que construyen redes de soporte por fuera de la institucionalidad formal de protección, transitando rutas diversas donde el descuido y las violencia vuelven a ser predominantes. Estos hallazgos derivan en una serie de discusiones en torno a la vida de las participantes, como el tránsito por un laberinto donde las violencias que experimentan crean encrucijadas y rodeos difíciles de evadir y superar; por otra parte, la maternidad se presenta como una propuesta que enfrenta a las mujeres a tensiones permanentes, donde la decisión de abortar es una postergación de aquella más que su negación, tensiones como las mutaciones de la religiosidad, que no solo dan soporte del ideal femenino y de su rol básico de la maternidad, sino también un elemento de soporte para la decisión. Se concluye con la propuesta del Cuidado Sororo de la Salud Sexual y Reproductiva (SSR), inspirada en las teorías feministas y en los aportes de las organizaciones sociales que defienden los derechos sexuales y reproductivos de las mujeres. Dicha propuesta se deriva de las narrativas de las mujeres y se centra en su autonomía para reivindicar la importancia del cuidado desde una perspectiva más humanizada, respetuosa, solidaria y empática. (AU)

The approach to the experiences of women who decided to have an abortion in Ecuador allowed us to understand the care trajectories they had to go through, based on their biographical accounts. A qualitative methodology was used with a biographical narrative approach and the participation of 19 women of legal age, residents of different provinces of Ecuador, a territory with restrictive legal and moral sanctioning measures around abortion. We found that the socio-biographical contexts of the participants were characterized by the presence of multiple forms of violence; their sexual and reproductive health decisions constitute a moral burden that makes them responsible and impose a series of social mandates in the midst of great limitations and restrictions; their trajectories and search for care are characterized by an absent State as guarantor, which leads them to take refuge in themselves or in some women who build support networks outside the formal institutionality of protection, going through diverse routes where neglect and violence are once again predominant. These findings lead to a series of discussions about the life of the participants as the transit through a labyrinth, where the violence they experience creates crossroads and detours difficult to avoid and overcome; motherhood as a proposal that confronts women with permanent tensions, where the decision to abort is a postponement of it, rather than its denial and the mutations of religiosity that not only support the feminine ideal and its basic role of motherhood, but also an element of support for the decision. It concludes with the proposal of Sororo Care of Sexual and Reproductive Care (SRH), inspired by feminist theories and the contributions of social organizations that defend women's sexual and reproductive rights. This proposal is derived from women's narratives and focuses on their autonomy, to vindicate the importance of care from a more humanized, respectful, supportive and empathetic perspective. (AU)

Describing the safety of abortion at the population level using network-based survey approaches.

BACKGROUND: Despite the negative impact of unsafe abortions on women's health and rights, the degree of abortion safety remains strikingly undocumented for a large share of abortions globally. Data on how women induce abortions (method, setting, provider) are central to the measurement of abortion safety. However, health-facility statistics and direct questioning in population surveys do not yield representative data on abortion care seeking pathways in settings where access to abortion services is highly restricted. Recent developments in survey methodologies to study stigmatized / illegal behaviour and hidden populations rely on the fact that such information circulates within social networks; however, such efforts have yet to give convincing results for unsafe abortions. OBJECTIVE: This article presents the protocol of a study whose purpose is to apply and develop further two network-based methods to contribute to the generation of reliable population-level information on the safety of abortions in contexts where access to legal abortion services is highly restricted. METHODS: This study plans to obtain population-level data on abortion care seeking in two Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems in urban Kenya and rural Burkina Faso by applying two methods: Anonymous Third-Party Reporting (ATPR) (also known as confidantes' method) and Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS). We will conduct a mixed methods formative study to determine whether these network-based approaches are pertinent in the study contexts. The ATPR will be refined notably by incorporating elements of the Network Scale-Up Method (NSUM) to correct or account for certain of its biases (transmission, barrier, social desirability, selection). The RDS will provide reliable alternative estimates of abortion safety if large samples and equilibrium can be reached; an RDS multiplex variant (also including social referents) will be tested. DISCUSSION: This study aims at documenting abortion safety in two local sites using ATPR and RDS. If successful, it will provide data on the safety profiles of abortion seekers across sociodemographic categories in two contrasted settings in sub-Saharan Africa. It will advance the formative research needed to determine whether ATPR and RDS are applicable or not in a given context. It will improve the questionnaire and correcting factors for the ATPR, improve the capacity of RDS to produce quasi-representative data on abortion safety, and advance the validation of both methods.

Representative data on how women induce abortions and their consequences are central to measurements of abortion safety. However, due to the stigmatized nature of abortion, measuring the details of the process is challenging when the latter occur out of the realm of the law and do not result in complications registered in hospital statistics. Hence, there is sparse empirical population-level data on how women terminate their pregnancies in countries where access to abortion services is highly restricted, as well as little data on the side effects and complications associated with the methods they chose and health seeking for these complications. Recent developments in indirect survey methodologies to study stigmatized/illegal behaviour and hidden populations are likely to improve the quality of data collected on abortion safety in restrictive contexts: all are based on the sharing of information on stigmatized practices in social networks. We propose to refine and pilot two such network-based methods to validate their use for collecting (quasi) representative data on abortion safety in large population health surveys. These two approaches are: (i) a modified Anonymous Third-Party Reporting method (ATPR) integrating elements of the Network-Scale-up Method (NSUM) and (ii) Respondent-Driven Sampling (RDS). We will conduct this study in two African Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems (HDSS) sites, one urban (Nairobi, Kenya), and one comprising a town and adjacent villages (Kaya, Burkina Faso).

Intimate relationships after receiving versus being denied an abortion: A 5-year prospective study in the United States.

CONTEXT: When an individual seeking an abortion cannot obtain one, carrying that pregnancy to term may affect both her relationship with the man involved in the pregnancy and her prospects for new intimate relationships. We aimed to assess the impact of receiving versus being denied a wanted abortion on women's intimate relationships, up to 5 years after seeking an abortion in the United States. METHODS: Using mixed-effects regression models, we compared relationship outcomes among women who presented for abortion care just under facilities' gestational age limits ("Near-limit abortion patients," n = 452) with those who presented just over, were denied an abortion ("Turnaways," n = 146) at 30 US facilities. RESULTS: At 1 week post-abortion seeking, the predicted probability of being in a relationship with the man involved in the pregnancy was 58%, gradually declining to 27% at 5 years with no significant differences between those who received and those who were denied an abortion. However, from 2 to 5 years post-abortion seeking, participants who were denied an abortion had double the odds (aOR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.09-3.69) of being in a poor intimate relationship, with a predicted probability of being in a poor relationship of 14% among those denied an abortion compared with 9% among those who received one (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Carrying an unwanted pregnancy to term does not increase the chance of being in an intimate relationship with the man involved in the pregnancy but may have negative implications for the quality of future relationships up to 5 years post-abortion seeking.

Men's involvement in women's abortion-related care: a scoping review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries.

Men's involvement in abortion is significant, intersecting across the individual, community and macro factors that shape abortion-related care pathways. This scoping review maps the evidence from low- and middle-income countries relating to male involvement, including male abortion providers, in abortion trajectories. Five databases were searched, using search terms, to yield 7493 items published in English between 01.01.2010 and 20.12.2019. 37 items met the inclusion criteria for items relating to male involvement in women's abortion trajectories and were synthesised using an abortion-related care-seeking framework. The majority of studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa and were qualitative. Evidence indicated that male involvement was significant, shaping the ability for a woman or girl to disclose her pregnancy or abortion decision. Men as partners were particularly influential, controlling resources necessary for abortion access and providing or withdrawing support for abortions. Denial or rejection of paternity was a critical juncture in many women's abortion trajectories. Men's involvement in abortion trajectories can be both direct and indirect. Contextual realities can make involving men in abortions a necessity, rather than a choice. The impact of male (lack of) involvement undermines the autonomy of a woman or girl to seek an abortion and shapes the conditions under which abortion-seekers are able to access care. This scoping review demonstrates the need for better understanding of the mechanisms, causes and intensions behind male involvement, centring the abortion seeker within this.

¿Qué se preguntan las enfermeras/os sobre el aborto? Una revisión panorámica / O que as enfermeiras se perguntam sobre o aborto? Uma revisão panorâmica / What are nurses asking about abortion? An overview review

Objetivo: Analizar las preguntas, metodologías y tendencias en investigaciones realizadas por enfermeras/os, con el fin de identificar los intereses disciplinares y posibles derivaciones en el desarrollo del conocimiento y las prácticas de cuidado. Metodología: Revisión panorámica en las bases de datos: Scielo, BVS, PubMed y Redalyc, con una ventana de búsqueda de 2008 a 2020, en idiomas español, inglés y portugués. Se incluyeron 33 artículos, produc-to de la búsqueda con términos de: MeSH, Nursing Care, Abortion, Abortion Applicants. Además, se emplearon expresiones en español sobre: cuidado de enfermería; enfermería; el aborto; el aborto y cuidado de enfermería en la salud pública; aborto inducido y cuidado de enfermería sobre salud mental; aborto criminal y salud mental; y, cuidado de enfermería frente a solicitantes de aborto. Análisis: Se observó una relación entre el tipo de estudios y el contexto jurídico de los países en que se realizaron. Son relevantes los estudios respecto de las actitudes, creencias y prácticas de enfermería en torno al aborto, poniendo el foco en la subjetividad de los profesionales de la disciplina. Resaltan los estudios cualitativos, haciendo acopio de teorías y conceptos de procedencia multidisciplinar y solo marginalmente de aquel-la producida por la disciplina de enfermería. Conclusiones: Las preguntas más frecuentes que se hacen las enfermeras/os sobre el aborto se dirigen especialmente a examinar las formas en que se provee el cuidado de enfermería a las mujeres que pasan por esta experiencia; del mismo modo se evidencia el correlato en las experiencias emocionales y dilemas éticos para el personal de enfermería, constituyéndose en un fenómeno controversial. Lo expuesto anteriormente implica para la disciplina de enfermería ampliar el repertorio para el abordaje epistemológico de este fenómeno, con miradas críticas transdisciplinares, que consideren el contexto social, cultural y normativo, con el fin de enriquecer la investigación disciplinar, que tenga efectos sobre la práctica profesional y los procesos de formación

Objective: Analyze the questions, methodologies and tendencies made in nursing research, with the purpose of identifying the disciplinary interests and possible derivations in the de-velopment of knowledge and care practices. Methodology: Scoping review in the databases: Scielo, BVS, Pubmed and Redalyc, with a search window from 2008 to 2020, in Spanish, English and Portuguese. Thirty-three articles were included, resulting from the search of the terms: MeSH, Nursing Care, Abortion, Abortion Applicants. Furthermore, the following Spanish expressions were used: nursing care; nursing; abortion; abortion and nursing care in public health; induced abortion and mental health nursing care; criminal abortion and men-tal health; and, nursing care for abortion applicants. Analysis: A relationship was observed between the type of studies and the legal context of the countries in which these were con-ducted. The studies about the attitudes, beliefs and nursing practices regarding abortion are relevant, focusing on the subjectivity of the professionals of this discipline. The qualitative studies stand out, gathering theories and concepts from multidisciplinary sources, and only marginally those from the nursing discipline. Conclusions: The most frequently asked ques-tions that nurses have about abortion are specially directed to examine the ways in which nursing care is provided to women who undergo this experience; similarly, the correlation between the emotional experiences and the ethical dilemmas for the nursing personnel is evi-denced, constituting a controversial phenomenon. The forementioned implies for the nursing discipline to broaden the repertoire for the epistemological approach of this phenomenon, with transdisciplinary critical views, that consider the social, cultural and regulatory context, in order to enrich the disciplinary research, having effects on the professional practice and the training processes

Objetivo: Analisar as questões, metodologias e tendências nas pesquisas realizadas pelos enfermeiros, a fim de identificar interesses disciplinares e possíveis derivações no desen-volvimento de práticas de conhecimento e cuidado. Metodologia: Revisão panorâmica nas bases de dados: Scielo, VHL, PubMed e Redalyc, com uma janela de pesquisa entre 2008 e 2020, em espanhol, inglês e português. Foram incluídos 33 artigos, produto da pesquisa com termos: MeSH, Nursing Care, Abortion, Abortion Applicants. Além disso, foram utilizadas expressões em espanhol: cuidado de enfermería, enfermería, aborto, aborto e cuidado de enfermería e salud pública; aborto inducido e cuidado de enfermería e salud mental; aborto criminal e salud mental e cuidado de enfermería, solicitantes de aborto. Análise: Observou-se relação entre o tipo de estudo e o contexto jurídico dos países em que foram realizados. Estu-dos sobre atitudes, crenças e práticas de enfermagem em torno do aborto são relevantes, com foco na subjetividade dos profissionais da disciplina. Destacam-se estudos qualitativos, cole-cionando teorias e conceitos de origem multidisciplinar e apenas marginalmente produzidas pela disciplina de enfermagem. Conclusões: As perguntas mais frequentes das enfermeiras sobre o aborto visam especialmente examinar as formas como a assistência de enfermagem é prestada às mulheres que passam por essa experiência; da mesma forma, evidencia-se a correlação entre experiências emocionais e dilemas éticos para o pessoal de enfermagem, tornando-se um fenômeno controverso. Os achados implicam à disciplina de enfermagem ampliar o repertório para a abordagem epistemológica desse fenômeno, com perspectivas críticas transdisciplinares, que considerem o contexto social, cultural e normativo, a fim de enriquecer a pesquisa disciplinar, com efeitos na prática profissional e nos processos formativos