Data-independent screening method for 14 fentanyl analogs in whole blood and oral fluid using LC-QTOF-MS.

Recently, fentanyl analogs account for significant number of opioid deaths in the United States. Routine forensic analyses are often unable to detect and differentiate these analogs due to low concentrations and presence of structural isomers. A data-independent screening method for 14 fentanyl analogs in whole blood and oral fluid was developed and validated using liquid chromatography-quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS). Data were acquired using Time of Flight (TOF) and All Ions Fragmentation (AIF) modes. The limits of detection (LOD) in blood were 0.1-1.0 ng/mL and 0.1-1.0 ng/mL in TOF and AIF modes, respectively. In oral fluid, the LODs were 0.25 ng/mL and 0.25-2.5 ng/mL in TOF and AIF modes, respectively. Matrix effects in blood were acceptable for most analytes (1-14.4%), while the nor-metabolites exhibited ion suppression >25%. Matrix effects in oral fluid were -11.7 to 13.3%. Stability was assessed after 24 h in the autosampler (4 °C) and refrigerator (4 °C). Processed blood and oral fluid samples were considered stable with -14.6 to 4.6% and -10.1 to 2.3% bias, respectively. For refrigerated stability, bias was -23.3 to 8.2% (blood) and -20.1 to 20.0% (oral fluid). Remifentanil exhibited >20% loss in both matrices. For proof of applicability, postmortem blood (n = 30) and oral fluid samples (n = 20) were analyzed. As a result, six fentanyl analogs were detected in the blood samples with furanyl fentanyl and 4-ANPP being the most prevalent. No fentanyl analogs were detected in the oral fluid samples. This study presents a validated screening technique for fentanyl analogs in whole blood and oral fluid using LC-QTOF-MS with low limits of detection.

Quality control and stability of ketamine, remifentanil, and sufentanil syringes in a pediatric operating theater.

BACKGROUND: Transforming a drug from its commercial form into a ready-to-use drug is common practice, especially in pediatrics. However, the risk of compounding error is real and data on drug stability in practice are not always available. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess, in real conditions, both the error rate and stability of three drugs: ketamine, remifentanil, and sufentanil. METHODS: A new rapid and easy-to-use high-performance liquid chromatography method with a diode array detector has been developed and validated to quantify these drugs and detect their degradation products. Over a 1-month period, 151 syringes were collected in the postanesthesia care unit. Seventy-three were stock solution syringes containing a 10-fold dilution of commercial drugs and 78 were serial dilution syringes made from successive dilutions of stock solutions. A comparison between real and expected concentrations as well as the detection of possible degradation products was carried out on these samples. RESULTS: All stock solution syringes had good chemical stability throughout the working day. A 4-µg/mL remifentanil serial dilution syringe, however, had to be discarded as a degradation peak was detected. Overall, 15.3% (95% CI, 9.5-21.1%) of syringes had a drug concentration outside the ±10% acceptability range, that is, 11.0% (95% CI, 3.7-18.2%) and 19.5% (95% CI, 10.6%-28.4%) of stock and diluted syringes respectively, with drug amounts ranging from -25.3% to 22.0%. The highest error rates were observed with sufentanil syringes: 20% and 28% for stock solution and serial dilution, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study shows that stock solution syringes prepared in advance are chemically stable throughout the day, unlike certain serial dilution syringes, indicating that the latter should be prepared just before administration to ensure chemical stability. Our results show that the error rate for serial dilution syringes is twice that of stock solution. Different safety measures are under discussion and have to be further studied.

Stability of sufentanil and baclofen mixtures for intrathecal analgesia at different concentrations in polypropylene syringes.

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal analgesia is a method using various molecules alone or in combination. Among these, the association sufentanil/ baclofen is widely used. Instead of moving patients to the few expert centers taking charge of these specific preparations, it could be better to transport syringes to peripheral centers managing pump refilling. That is why, it is interesting to demonstrate the stability of the mixture, and so to be able to ensure the best transport conditions of syringes. METHODS: A stability indicating UPLC-DAD method was developed and validated according to the ICH guidelines. Four mixtures of sufentanil baclofen stored in 5±3°C and 25±2°C were evaluated for seven days and compared to the initial observed concentrations. RESULTS: The stability is demonstrated only for preparations stored at 5±3°C for seven days thanks to relative concentrations (95% confidence intervals of the mean of 3 samples) systematically positioned between 90% and 110%. On the other hand, after few days, degradation products of sufentanil appeared for all mixtures stored at 25°C±2°C. CONCLUSION: This study shows the stability of a weakly and a highly concentrated mixture of sufentanil and baclofen solutions in polypropylene syringes stored at 5±3°C for seven days. This result will allow the transport of the preparation under optimal conditions. Advance preparations for intrathecal pump refills could also be feasible.

Surfactant assisted pulsed two-phase electromembrane extraction followed by GC analysis for quantification of basic drugs in biological samples.

In this work, a simple and efficient surfactant assisted pulsed two-phase electromembrane extraction (SA-PEME) procedure combined with gas chromatography (GC) has been developed for the determination of alfentanil, sufentanil and methadone in various samples. It has been found that the addition of anionic surfactant causes the accumulation of the cationic analytes at the SLM/solution interface resulting in an easier transfer of the analytes into the organic phase. The method was accomplished with 1-octanol as the acceptor phase and supported liquid membrane (SLM) by means of an 80 V pulsed electrical driving force and the extraction time of 20 min. The model analytes were extracted from 3.0 mL sample solution (pH 4.0) containing 0.02% w/v surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate). The duty cycle of 92% and frequency of 0.357 Hz gave the best performance. Extraction recoveries in the range of 70.5-95.2% and satisfactory repeatability (7.6

Miniaturized hollow fibre assisted liquid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography for determination of trace concentration of sufentanil and alfentanil in biological samples.

A simple and highly sensitive method that involves miniaturized hollow fibre assisted liquid-phase microextraction with gas chromatography-flame ionization detector was developed for the determination of trace concentration of sufentanil and alfentanil in biological samples. These drugs were extracted from 5 ml of aqueous solution with pH 10.0 into an organic extracting solvent (1-octanol) impregnated in the pores and lumen of a hollow fibre. After extraction for a prescribed time, 2.0 µl of the extraction solvent was injected directly in to the GC injection port. Under the optimized conditions, (1-octanol as extracting solvent, stirring rate of 700 rpm, 15% (w/v) salt addition, pH 10.0 and 25 min sampling time at 50 °C) large enrichment factors of 535 and 420 were achieved for sufentanil and alfentanil, respectively. Dynamic linear ranges were in the range of 0.05 to 500 ng/ml for sufentanil and 0.1 to 500 ng/ml for alfentanil. Limits of detection 0.01 and 0.02 ng/ml were obtained for sufentanil and alfentanil, respectively. The percent relative intra-day and inter-day standard deviations were found to be less than 8.4% (n = 5). Finally, this method was successfully applied for the separation, preconcentration and determination of trace concentration of sufentanil and alfentanil in plasma and urine samples.

Comparison of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and hollow fiber liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction for the determination of fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil in water and biological fluids by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) and hollow fiber liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction (HF-LLLME) combined with HPLC-DAD have been applied for the determination of three narcotic drugs (alfentanil, fentanyl, and sufentanil) in biological samples (human plasma and urine). Different DLLME parameters influencing the extraction efficiency such as type and volume of the extraction solvent and the disperser solvent, concentration of NaOH, and salt addition were investigated. In the HF-LLLME, the effects of important parameters including organic solvent type, concentration of NaOH as donor solution, concentration of H(2)SO(4) as acceptor phase, salt addition, stirring rate, temperature, and extraction time were investigated and optimized. The results showed that both extraction methods exhibited good linearity, precision, enrichment factor, and detection limit. Under optimal condition, the limits of detection ranged from 0.4 to 1.9 µg/L and from 1.1 to 2.3 µg/L for DLLME and HF-LLLME, respectively. For DLLME, the intra- and inter-day precisions were 1.7-6.4% and 14.2-15.9%, respectively; and for HF-LLLME were 0.7-5.2% and 3.3-10.1%, respectively. The enrichment factors were from 275 to 325 and 190 to 237 for DLLME and HF-LLLME, respectively. The applicability of the proposed methods was investigated by analyzing biological samples. For analysis of human plasma and urine samples, HF-LLLME showed higher precision, more effective sample clean-up, higher extraction efficiency, lower organic solvent consumption than DLLME.

Development and validation of a highly sensitive gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric screening method for the simultaneous determination of nanogram levels of fentanyl, sufentanil and alfentanil in air and surface contamination wipes.

A highly sensitive gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric (GC-MS) analytical method for the determination of the opioid narcotics fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil in industrial hygiene personal air samples and surface contamination wipes was developed and comprehensively validated. Sample preparation involved a single step extraction of the samples with methanol, fortified with a fixed amount of the penta-deuterated analogues of the opioid narcotics as internal standard. The GC-MS analytical procedure using selected ion monitoring (SIM) was shown to be highly selective. Linearity was shown for levels of extracted wipe and air samples corresponding to at least 0.1-2 times their surface contamination limit (SCL) and accordingly to 0.1-2 times their time weighted average occupational exposure limit (OEL-TWA) based on a full shift 9601 air sample. Extraction recoveries were determined for spiked air samples and surface wipes and were found to be quantitative for both sampling media in the entire range studied. The air sampling method's limit of detection (LOD) was determined to be 0.4 ng per sample for fentanyl and sufentanil and 1.6 ng per sample for alfentanil, corresponding to less than 1% of their individual OEL for a full shift air sample (9601). The limit of quantification (LOQ) was found to be 1.4, 1.2, and 5.0 ng per filter for fentanyl, sufentanil, and alfentanil, respectively. The wipe sampling method had LODs of 4 ng per wipe for fentanyl and sufentanil and 16 ng per wipe for alfentanil and LOQs of respectively, 14, 12, and 50 ng per wipe. The analytical intra-assay precision of the air sampling and wipe sampling method, defined as the coefficient of variation on the analytical result of six replicate spiked media was below 10 and 5%, respectively, for all opioids at all spike levels. Accuracy expressed as relative error was determined to be below 10%, except for alfentanil at the lowest spike level (-13.1%). The stability of the opioids during simulated air sampling was investigated. For fentanyl and sufentanil a quantitative recovery was observed at all spike levels, while for alfentanil recoveries ranged from 60.3 to 85.4%. When spiked air samples were stored at ambient temperature and at -15 degrees C quantitative recovery was found for fentanyl and sufentanil after 7 and 14 days. For alfentanil a slight loss seemed to occur upon storage during 7 days, being more explicit after 14 days. Ambient storage of spiked wipes seemed to lead to significant losses of all opioids studied, yielding recoveries of 37.7-88.3%. Upon storage of similar wipes at -15 degrees C a significantly higher recovery was found ranging from 77.3 to 88.3%. The developed analytical and sampling procedures have been recently applied in an explorative field study of which the results of surface contamination wipe sampling are presented in this paper. To our knowledge, this is the first study addressing the development and validation of analytical procedures for the assessment of external occupational exposure to potent opioid narcotics.

A simple method for quantifying fentanyl, sufentanil, or morphine in discard syringes from anesthesia procedures.

Fentanyl, sufentanil, and morphine are commonly used in the conduct of anesthesia. Medical staff working with these drugs are at high risk of addiction. To detect and prevent diversion, a method was developed to quantify these drugs in discard syringes using the BioRad REMEDi HS Drug Profiling System. For fentanyl, the lowest concentration detected is 0.1 microg/mL, and the assay is linear to 5.0 microg/mL; the within-run coefficient of variation (CV) is 0.9% (n = 5), and between-run CV is 2.5% (n = 20). For sufentanil, the lowest concentration detected is 0.5 microg/mL, and the assay is linear to 11.0 microg/mL; the within-run CV is 2.0% (n = 5), and the between-run CV is 2.4% (n = 20). For morphine, the lowest concentration detected is 0.5 microg/mL, and the assay is linear to 10.0 microg/mL; the within-run CV is 11.6% (n = 5), and between-run CV is 11.3% (n = 20). Other drugs commonly used in the operating room were checked for cross-reactivity on the REMEDi HS; none cross-reacted. The REMEDi HS can be used for rapid, accurate quantification of fentanyl, sufentanil, and morphine in discard syringes from anesthesia procedures or related medical applications.

Development and validation of an HPLC assay for fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil in swab samples.

A high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for the assay of fentanyl citrate, alfentanil hydrochloride, and sufentanil citrate swab samples was developed and validated in order to control a cleaning procedure. The swabbing procedure involved Super POLX 1200 wipers moistened with water. The assay employed extraction of swabs with water and analysis by isocratic, reversed-phase, HPLC with varying ultraviolet (UV) detection for desired sensitivity, depending on the analyte. The method was shown to be selective and linear from the limits of quantitation (0.10, 0.20, and 0.15 microg/swab for fentanyl citrate, alfentanil, and sufentanil, respectively) to over three times these concentrations. The assay limits (detection levels) per swab area were set at least at 0.2% of the concentrations of the actives in the drug products (0.02, 0.10, and 0.10 microg/swab or approximately 0.03, 0.02, and 0.2% for fentanyl citrate, alfentanil, and sufentanil, respectively). It should be noted that all active concentrations listed in this work were calculated based on the salt form concentration for fentanyl (citrate salt) and the free base forms for alfentanil and sufentanil. No reference standard was available for alfentanil hydrochloride and sufentanil citrate. Drug product was used instead throughout this study.

Analysis of low concentration sufentanil citrate/bupivacaine hydrochloride admixtures, using solid phase extraction followed by high-performance liquid chromatography.

A method has been developed for the quantitative determination of low concentrations of sufentanil citrate (1.0 microg/ml), in the presence of bupivacaine hydrochloride (0.125%), in the quality control of pharmaceutical preparations. The main problem in analysis of this combination is the low concentration of sufentanil citrate in the presence of relatively high concentrations of bupivacaine hydrochloride. This paper describes the validation of a HPLC method of sufentanil citrate in an admixture with bupivacaine hydrochloride using solid phase extraction (SPE). The optimized method shows good linearity, precision and accuracy. The limits of detection (0.09 microg/l) and quantification (0.29 microg/l) for sufentanil citrate are lower than the maximal accepted limits. This method is currently used in stability studies.

Analgesia peridural para o trabalho de parto e para o parto: efeitos de adiçäo de um opióide / Effects of the association of an opioid with epidural analgesia for labor and delivery

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a eficácia e segurança da associaçao bupivacaína com sufentanil para a analgesia no trabalho de parto e do parto por meio de um bloqueio peridural contínuo. Realizou-se um ensaio clínico duplo-cego, prospectivo e aleatório, incluindo sessenta mulheres nulíparas da Maternidade do CAISM/UNICAMP. No momento da analgesia, as mulheres foram aleatoriamente alocadas em dois grupos: BS, recebendo 12,5 mg de bupivacaína com adrenalina mais 30 mug de sufentanil e BP, recebendo 12,5 mg de bupivacaína com adrenalina mais placebo. Foram avaliados os parametros relativos à qualidade e duraçao da analgesia, duraçao do trabalho de parto e também possíveis efeitos sobre o recém-nascido. Os resultados mostraram a superioridade da adiçao do sufentanil sobre o grau de analgesia durante o tempo de açao da primeira dose de anestésico local. Nao houve aumento na duraçao do trabalho de parto depois do início da analgesia quando se compararam ambos os grupos, nem qualquer diferença quanto à via de parto. Nao houve também diferenças entre os grupos com relaçao à avaliaçao dos recém-nascidos. Conclui-se que a associaçao de 30 mug de sufentanil à primeira dose de bupivacaína é segura e eficaz, melhorando a qualidade da analgesia, sua duraçao e nao afetando a progressao do trabalho de parto e o resultado neonatal.

Analysis of fentanyl and sufentanil in hair by GC/MS/MS.

Fentanyl and sufentanil are potent narcotic analgesics used only in hospitals as anaesthetic agents. The dependence potential of fentanyl is known. As they are given in doses at the microgram level and their elimination half-life is in the order of a few hours, detection in body fluids is possible only for a short time after administration. Radioimmunological methods are the only ones capable of detecting fentanyl in hair, as normal GC/MS methods for hair analysis are not sensitive enough to detect the drugs after doses in the order of micrograms. We therefore chose GC/MS/MS to analyse fentanyl and sufentanil in two cases where the drugs were given under controlled conditions over several days. The concentration was in the order of less than 100 pg/mg hair.

Use of refractometry to identify opioid-containing solutions.

The purpose of this laboratory study was to assess the value of refractometry in identifying the contents of a variety of opioid-containing solutions. A hand-held refractometer was used to document the refraction produced by the undiluted contents of alfentanil, fentanyl, morphine, sufentanil ampoules and by solutions of Ringer's lactate, 0.9% saline, 3.3% dextrose in 0.3% saline, and distilled water. Each opioid was then serially diluted in serial 1:2, 1:4, and 1:8 dilutions in each of these solutions and the refractions of each determined. Based on this information, blinded identification of various diluted opioid solutions was attempted. Refractometer values for undiluted fentanyl and sufentanil were identical with those for distilled water. Those for undiluted alfentanil and morphine were almost identical with each other and with 1:2 and 1:4 dilutions of either drug in Ringer's lactate or 0.9% saline. We conclude that refractometry is an unreliable screening method to detect tampering with opioid solutions.

Immunoassay evidence for fentanyl in hair of surgery patients.

Head hair samples obtained from surgery patients who received fentanyl during anesthesia were analyzed by immunoassay for the presence of fentanyl. Thirteen hair samples were collected from patients following intravenous administration of 1-6 mg of fentanyl. Additional hair samples were collected following the administration of 0.18 and 0.38 mg of sufentanil to 2 patients. The elapsed time after drug administration for all patients ranged from 7 to 273 days. Twenty control hair samples also were collected from staff members who reported no surgery or anesthesia during the previous year. All samples were initially washed with methanol, followed by extraction with methanol and reconstitution in citrate buffer. Analysis of wash and extract fractions was performed by radioimmunoassay (Coat-A-Count Fentanyl assay). Segmental analysis was performed on the surgery patients' hair samples. Eight of the fentanyl patients' hair samples contained fentanyl concentrations (equivalents) of 0.13-0.48 ng/10 mg of hair in the 'root' end. Fentanyl concentrations in the 'tip' segment were lower than those found in the 'root' segment with the exception of 1 subject whose hair sample had been collected only 7 days after surgery. The remaining 5 patients had fentanyl concentrations similar to those determined for the control subjects hair samples (0-0.08 ng/10 mg, n = 19). No correlation between hair fentanyl concentration and administered dose was found for the 13 fentanyl subjects. Both sufentanil subjects' hair samples tested negative. One control subject who had experienced environmental exposure to fentanyl had a fentanyl concentration of 0.29 ng/10 mg in the extract and 0.63 ng/10 mg in the wash fraction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)