Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 82.988
Filtrar
1.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 590, 2024 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773438

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) status is an important prognostic factor for parotid gland cancer (PGC). This study aimed to analyze the impact of extranodal extension (ENE) of intraparotid LN and LN metastasis burden on survival in PGC. METHODS: Patients with surgically treated PGC and at least one metastatic cervical LN were retrospectively enrolled. Primary outcome variables were distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). The impact of ENE and LN metastasis burden was assessed using the Cox model. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients were included. ENE in cervical or intraparotid LN was not associated with DMFS, DSS, or OS. Intraparotid LN metastasis had a significant impact on prognosis, and the presence of only one metastatic intraparotid LN offered an approximately 1.5-fold risk of distant metastasis. Prognostic models based on the number of positive LNs (1 vs. 2-3 vs. 4+) were superior to the AJCC N stage in terms of DMFS, DSS, and OS. CONCLUSIONS: ENE of cervical or intraparotid LN has a limited effect on the prognosis of PGC, and the number of positive LNs is better than the AJCC N stage in LN status evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Ganglios Linfáticos , Metástasis Linfática , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de la Parótida , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Parótida/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Anciano , Pronóstico , Adulto , Extensión Extranodal/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Cuello/patología
2.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 442, 2024 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773457

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (preCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer in older people who were classified as "fit" by comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). METHODS: A single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial was designed. Patients were eligible for this study if they were aged 70 years or above and met the standards of "fit" (SIOG1) as evaluated by CGA and of the locally advanced risk category. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS). Patients were scheduled to receive preCRT (50 Gy) with raltitrexed (3 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22). RESULTS: One hundred and nine patients were evaluated by CGA, of whom eighty-six, eleven and twelve were classified into the fit, intermediate and frail category. Sixty-eight fit patients with a median age of 74 years were enrolled. Sixty-four patients (94.1%) finished radiotherapy without dose reduction. Fifty-four (79.3%) patients finished the prescribed raltitrexed therapy as planned. Serious toxicity (grade 3 or above) was observed in twenty-four patients (35.3%), and fourteen patients (20.6%) experienced non-hematological side effects. Within a median follow-up time of 36.0 months (range: 5.9-63.1 months), the 2-year overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 89.6% (95% CI: 82.3-96.9), 92.4% (95% CI: 85.9-98.9) and 75.6% (95% CI: 65.2-86.0), respectively. Forty-eight patients (70.6%) underwent surgery (R0 resection 95.8%, R1 resection 4.2%), the corresponding R0 resection rate among the patients with positive mesorectal fascia status was 76.6% (36/47). CONCLUSION: This phase II trial suggests that preCRT is efficient with tolerable toxicities in older rectal cancer patients who were evaluated as fit based on CGA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The registration number on ClinicalTrials.gov was NCT02992886 (14/12/2016).


Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia , Evaluación Geriátrica , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Tiofenos/administración & dosificación , Tiofenos/uso terapéutico , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Quinazolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinazolinas/uso terapéutico
3.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 70(5): e20231115, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775501

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries, with a majority of cases being low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer. Identifying risk factors for disease recurrence and poor prognosis is critical. This study aimed to assess the correlation between preoperative cancer antigen-125 levels and disease recurrence in early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer patients. METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of 217 patients diagnosed with endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent surgical treatment at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital between 2016 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on their preoperative cancer antigen-125 levels and compared with clinicopathological findings and disease recurrence. Disease-free survival rates were calculated, and logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent factors affecting disease-free survival. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 61.59±0.75 years, and the mean follow-up time was 36.95±1.18 months. The mean cancer antigen-125 level was 27.80±37.81 IU/mL. The recurrence rate was significantly higher in the group with elevated cancer antigen-125 levels (p=0.025). Disease-free survival was lower in patients with elevated cancer antigen-125 compared with those with normal levels (p=0.005). Logistic regression analysis revealed that elevated cancer antigen-125 levels were associated with disease recurrence (OR: 3.43, 95%CI 1.13-10.37, p=0.029). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that preoperative cancer antigen-125 levels can be used as a predictor of disease recurrence in early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer patients. cancer antigen-125 levels may be a useful tool for risk stratification and patient management in endometrial cancer.


Asunto(s)
Antígeno Ca-125 , Neoplasias Endometriales , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Endometriales/sangre , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/sangre , Antígeno Ca-125/sangre , Factores de Riesgo , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Periodo Preoperatorio , Carcinoma Endometrioide/sangre , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patología , Carcinoma Endometrioide/mortalidad , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Pronóstico
4.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 140, 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720305

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We investigated the real-world efficacy of adjuvant therapy for stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients with pathological high-risk factors. METHODS: Study participants were enrolled from November 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020. Clinical bias was balanced by propensity score matching. Disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify survival-associated factors. p ≤ 0.05 was the threshold for statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 454 patients, among whom 134 (29.5%) underwent adjuvant therapy, were enrolled in this study. One hundred and eighteen of the patients who underwent adjuvant therapy were well matched with non-treatment patients. Prognostic outcomes of the treatment group were significantly better than those of the non-treatment group, as revealed by Kaplan-Meier analysis after PSM. Differences in prevention of recurrence or metastasis between the targeted therapy and chemotherapy groups were insignificant. Adjuvant therapy was found to be positive prognostic factors, tumor size and solid growth patterns were negative. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy significantly improved the DFS for stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients with high-risk factors. Larger prospective clinical trials should be performed to verify our findings.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Puntaje de Propensión , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/patología , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/terapia , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neumonectomía/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Pronóstico , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier
5.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 34(5): 604-609, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720224

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the associated risk factors for isolated liver metastasis in breast cancer patients and to detect the prognostic factors related to survival. STUDY DESIGN: Analytical study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of General Surgery, The University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkiye, from January 2011 to November 2020. METHODOLOGY: Patients with breast cancer liver metastasis who experienced surgery were retrospectively analysed for breast cancer and metastases-related characteristics. Descriptive statistical methods were used in the evaluation of data. Survival analyses were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank and univariable Cox regression tests were utilised to search for prognostic factors' impact on survival. RESULTS: Out of 12 patients, 11 had recurrent disease after a median of 36 months of disease-free survival (DFS) and one patient had de novo metastasis. Grade 3 tumours and increased expression of Ki-67 had a negative effect on DFS. The median follow-up period was 66 months. Survival analysis showed 2- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival rates were 82%, 69%, 92%, and 82%, respectively. Development of liver metastasis in 3 years following breast cancer treatment was linked to worse PFS (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION:  Long-term survival is possible for breast cancer survivors with liver metastasis. Disease-free interval is an important determinant. Longer progression-free survival was detected in patients who had developed metastasis after three years of breast cancer treatment. KEY WORDS: Breast cancer, Liver metastasis, Hepatic surgery.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Pronóstico , Anciano , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Turquía/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia
6.
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi ; 32(4): 332-339, 2024 Apr 20.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733188

RESUMEN

Objective: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: 2054 cases with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0~B at the Fifth Medical Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital from January 2006 to September 2020 were retrospectively collected. All patients were followed up for at least 2 years. The primary endpoint of overall survival and secondary endpoints (tumor-related survival, disease-free survival, and postoperative complications) of patients treated with ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method was used for stratified survival rate analysis. Fine-and-Gray competing risk model was used to analyze overall survival. Results: A total of 5 503 HCC nodules [mean tumor diameter (2.6±1.6) cm] underwent 3 908 MWAs between January 2006 and September 2020, with a median follow-up time of 45.6 (24.0 -79.2) months.The technical effectiveness rate of 5 375 tumor nodules was 97.5%. The overall survival rates at 5, 10, and 15-years were 61.6%, 38.8%, and 27.0%, respectively. The tumor-specific survival rates were 67.1%, 47.2%, and 37.7%, respectively. The free tumor survival rates were 25.8%, 15.7%, and 9.9%, respectively. The incidence rate of severe complications was 2.8% (108/3 908). Further analysis showed that the technical effectiveness and survival rate over the passing three time periods from January 2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2016-September 2020 were significantly increased, with P < 0.001, especially for liver cancer 3.1~5.0 cm (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Microwave ablation therapy is a safe and effective method for BCLC stage 0-B, with significantly enhanced technical efficacy and survival rate over time.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Microondas , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Microondas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Femenino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
7.
Saudi Med J ; 45(5): 481-489, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734428

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical relevance and prognostic value of changes in the Naples prognostic score (NPS) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACR) among esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. METHODS: We studied 232 locally advanced ESCC patients who received NACR before undergoing esophagectomy retrospectively. Categorizing individuals into the elevated NPS group and the non-elevated NPS group based on the change in NPS after NACR (ΔNPS > 0 or ∆NPS ≤ 0), we examined and compared the clinicopathological characteristics, survival rates, and postoperative complications between these 2 groups (∆NPS = post-NACR NPS - pre-NACR NPS). RESULTS: Results: Out of the 232 patients enrolled, 105 exhibited elevated NPS levels, while 127 showed non-elevated NPS levels. Survival analyses indicated inferior overall survival (OS) (p=0.024) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p=0.047) in the elevated NPS cohort compared to the non-elevated NPS cohort. Subsequent cox regression analyses identified the post-NACR change in NPS as an independent prognostic indicator for RFS (p=0.029) and OS (p=0.036). CONCLUSION: Elevated NPS post-NACR emerged as a significant indicator of worse prognosis for locally advanced ESCC patients who underwent NACR. This finding has great potential to be useful for recognizing high-risk ESCC patients who received NACR before undergoing esophagectomy and making individualized subsequent therapeutic decisions in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Esofagectomía , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad
8.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(9)2024 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38732263

RESUMEN

V-set domain-containing T-cell activation inhibitor 1 (aliases VTCN1, B7H4) participates in tumour immune escape by delivering inhibitory signals to T cells. The purpose of this article was to assess the B7H4 prognostic value in solid cancers. Three databases were searched for relevant articles. The main endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Appropriate hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled. The R studio software (version 4.0.3) was used for data analysis. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. High expression of B7H4 was associated with worse OS (HR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.37-1.68) but not with DSS (HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.49-2.63), RFS (HR = 1.77, 95% CI: 0.75-4.18), DFS (HR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.8-2.09), or PFS (HR = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.91-3.2) in patients with solid cancers. High expression of B7H4 is associated with a poorer prognosis in patients with solid cancers. B7H4 is a promising prognostic biomarker and immunotherapeutic target for various solid cancers because of its activity in cancer immunity and tumourigenesis.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor , Neoplasias , Inhibidor 1 de la Activación de Células T con Dominio V-Set , Humanos , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias/inmunología , Inhibidor 1 de la Activación de Células T con Dominio V-Set/metabolismo , Inhibidor 1 de la Activación de Células T con Dominio V-Set/genética , Pronóstico , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad
9.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(9)2024 Apr 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38732928

RESUMEN

Off-clamp partial nephrectomy represents one of the latest developments in nephron-sparing surgery, with the goal of preserving renal function and reducing ischemia time. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the functional, oncologic, and perioperative outcomes between off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (off-C RAPN) and off-clamp open partial nephrectomy (off-C OPN) through a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. A 1:1 PSM analysis was used to balance variables potentially affecting postoperative outcomes. To report surgical quality, 1 year trifecta was used. Univariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of trifecta achievement. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) probabilities between groups. Overall, 542 patients were included. After PSM analysis, two homogeneous cohorts of 147 patients were obtained. The off-C RAPN cohort experienced shorter length of stay (LoS) (3.4 days vs. 5.4 days; p < 0.001), increased likelihoods of achieving 1 year trifecta (89.8% vs. 80.3%; p = 0.03), lower postoperative Clavien-Dindo ≤ 2 complications (1.3% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001), and lower postoperative transfusion rates (3.4% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.008). At univariable analysis, the surgical approach (off-C RAPN vs. off-C OPN, OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.09-4.46, p = 0.02) was the only predictor of 1 year trifecta achievement. At Kaplan-Meier analysis, no differences were observed between the two groups in terms of OS (log-rank p = 0.451), CSS (log-rank p = 0.476), DFS (log-rank p = 0.678), and MFS (log-rank p = 0.226). Comparing RAPN and OPN in a purely off-clamp scenario, the minimally invasive approach proved to be a feasible and safe surgical approach, with a significantly lower LoS and minor rate of postoperative complications and transfusions as a result of improved surgical quality expressed by higher 1 year trifecta achievement.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Puntaje de Propensión , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier
10.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 157, 2024 May 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735992

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The JCOG (Japan Clinical Oncology Group) 0212 study did not confirm the noninferiority of mesorectal excision (ME) alone to ME with LLND for rectal or anal adenocarcinomas. Furthermore, the significance of LLND for SCCs remains unknown. We evaluated the significance of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anal canal. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 435 patients with SCCs among 1,781 patients with anal canal tumors. In 40 patients who underwent LLND, the 5-year relapse-free survival (5y-RFS) and 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) were compared between groups with positive and negative histopathological findings. In 71 patients with negative lateral lymph node metastasis in the preoperative diagnosis, the 5y-RFS, 5y-OS, and 5-year local recurrence-free survival were compared between patients who did and did not undergo LLND. RESULTS: The clinical and pathological T stages predicted pathological lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. There was no statistically significant difference in 5y-RFS and 5y-OS between patients who did and did not undergo LLND. Among patients who underwent LLND, 5y-RFS in those with positive histopathological findings (15.0%) was worse than that in those without (59.2%) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who underwent LLND, 5y-RFS in those with positive histopathological findings than in those without LLND did not contribute to prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Metástasis Linfática , Humanos , Neoplasias del Ano/patología , Neoplasias del Ano/cirugía , Neoplasias del Ano/mortalidad , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Anciano , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Tasa de Supervivencia
11.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 66, 2024 May 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702488

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Since the literature currently provides controversial data on the postoperative outcomes following right and left hemicolectomies, we carried out this study to examine the short- and long-term treatment outcomes. METHODS: This study included consecutive patients who underwent right or left-sided colonic resections from year 2014 to 2018 and then they were followed up. The short-term outcomes such as postoperative morbidity and mortality according to Clavien-Dindo score, duration of hospital stay, and 90-day readmission rate were evaluated as well as long-term outcomes of overall survival and disease-free survival. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed of overall and progression-free survival. RESULTS: In total, 1107 patients with colon tumors were included in the study, 525 patients with right-sided tumors (RCC) and 582 cases with tumors in the left part of the colon (LCC). RCC group patients were older (P < 0.001), with a higher ASA score (P < 0.001), and with more cardiovascular comorbidities (P < 0.001). No differences were observed between groups in terms of postoperative outcomes such as morbidity and mortality, except 90-day readmission which was more frequent in the RCC group. Upon histopathological analysis, the RCC group's patients had more removed lymph nodes (29 ± 14 vs 20 ± 11, P = 0.001) and more locally progressed (pT3-4) tumors (85.4% versus 73.4%, P = 0.001). Significantly greater 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival (P = 0.001) were observed for patients in the LCC group, according to univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with right-sided colon cancer were older and had more advanced disease. Short-term surgical outcomes were similar, but patients in the LCC group resulted in better long-term outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Humanos , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Estudios de Cohortes , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Readmisión del Paciente , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Tiempo de Internación
12.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 560, 2024 May 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704543

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Developing countries have a significantly higher incidence of breast cancer in patients younger than 40 years as compared to developed countries. This study aimed to examine if young age at diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for worse survival outcomes in breast cancer as well as the effect of age on Disease-free survival (DFS) and local recurrence free survival (LRFS) after adjusting for various tumor characteristics, local and systemic treatments. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of prospective cohort of patients from two existing databases. We identified patients with breast cancer aged 40 years or less and we matched them to those older than 40 years. We also matched based on stage and molecular subtypes. In cohort 1, we matched at a ratio of 1:1, while in cohort 2 we matched at a ratio of 1:3. RESULTS: In cohort 1, Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was significantly shorter for those younger than 40 years (75.6% and 92.7% respectively; p < 0.03). On multivariate analysis, only chemotherapy was found to be significant, while age was not found to be an independent predictor of prognosis. Local recurrence free survival at 5 years was similar between both age categories. Only hormonal therapy is a significant predictor for LRFS at 5 years. In the second cohort, DFS and LRFS at 3 years were similar between those younger and those older than 40 years. On multivariate analysis, no factor including age was found to be an independent predictor of prognosis. CONCLUSION: Data in the literature is controversial on the effect of young age on breast cancer prognosis. Our findings could not demonstrate that age is an independent prognostic factor in our population. There is a need for outcomes from larger, prospective series that have longer follow-ups and more data from our region.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Femenino , Adulto , Líbano/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estadificación de Neoplasias
13.
Mediators Inflamm ; 2024: 4465592, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38707705

RESUMEN

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the impact and predictive value of the preoperative NPRI on short-term complications and long-term prognosis in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical surgery for colorectal cCancer (CRC). Methods: A total of 302 eligible CRC patients were included, assessing five inflammation-and nutrition-related markers and various clinical features for their predictive impact on postoperative outcomes. Emphasis was on the novel indicator NPRI to elucidate its prognostic and predictive value for perioperative risks. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a history of abdominal surgery, prolonged surgical duration, CEA levels ≥5 ng/mL, and NPRI ≥ 3.94 × 10-2 as independent risk factors for postoperative complications in CRC patients. The Clavien--Dindo complication grading system highlighted the close association between preoperative NPRI and both common and severe complications. Multivariate analysis also identified a history of abdominal surgery, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, poorly differentiated or undifferentiated tumors, and NPRI ≥ 2.87 × 10-2 as independent risk factors for shortened overall survival (OS). Additionally, a history of abdominal surgery, tumor maximum diameter ≥5 cm, tumor differentiation as poor/undifferentiated, NPRI ≥ 2.87 × 10-2, and TNM Stage III were determined as independent risk factors for shortened disease-free survival (DFS). Survival curve results showed significantly higher 5-year OS and DFS in the low NPRI group compared to the high NPRI group. The incorporation of NPRI into nomograms for OS and DFS, validated through calibration and decision curve analyses, attested to the excellent accuracy and practicality of these models. Conclusion: Preoperative NPRI independently predicts short-term complications and long-term prognosis in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, enhancing predictive accuracy when incorporated into nomograms for patient survival.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Laparoscopía , Neutrófilos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Prealbúmina , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Pronóstico , Prealbúmina/metabolismo , Factores de Riesgo , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Adulto , Análisis Multivariante , Modelos Logísticos
14.
Br J Surg ; 111(5)2024 May 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713611

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision for gastric cancer improves survival compared with just D2 lymphadenectomy. METHODS: Between September 2014 and June 2018, patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy or D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision gastrectomy. The modified intention-to-treat population was defined as patients who had pathologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma (pT1 N1-3 M0 and pT2-4 N0-3 M0). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints were the recurrence pattern and overall survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up of patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy group (169 patients) and patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy +complete mesogastric excision group (169 patients) was 55 (interquartile range 37-60) months and 51 (interquartile range 40-60) months respectively. Recurrence occurred in 50 patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy group (29.6%) versus 33 patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group (19.5%) (P = 0.032). The 3-year disease-free survival was 75.5% (95% c.i. 68.3% to 81.3%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy group versus 85.0% (95% c.i. 78.7% to 89.6%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group (log rank P = 0.042). The HR for recurrence in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group versus the D2 lymphadenectomy group was 0.64 (95% c.i. 0.41 to 0.99) by Cox regression (P = 0.045). The 3-year overall survival rate was 77.5% (95% c.i. 70.4% to 83.1%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy group versus 85.8% (95% c.i. 79.6% to 90.2%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group (log rank P = 0.058). The HR for death in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group versus the D2 lymphadenectomy group was 0.64 (95% c.i. 0.41 to 1.02) (P = 0.058). CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional D2 dissection, D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision is associated with better disease-free survival, but there is no statistically significant difference in overall survival. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01978444 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Gastrectomía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Gastrectomía/métodos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Laparoscopía/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Adulto , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estadificación de Neoplasias
15.
Oncoimmunology ; 13(1): 2347441, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38694625

RESUMEN

In clinical practice, the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) following tumor surgical resection raises a critical dilemma for stage II colon cancer (CC) patients. The prognostic features used to identify high-risk CC patients rely on the pathological assessment of tumor cells. Currently, these factors are considered for stratifying patients who may benefit from ACT at early CC stages. However, the extent to which these factors predict clinical outcomes (i.e. recurrence, survival) remains highly controversial, also uncertainty persists regarding patients' response to treatment, necessitating further investigation. Therefore, an imperious need is to explore novel biomarkers that can reliably stratify patients at risk, to optimize adjuvant treatment decisions. Recently, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of Immunoscore (IS), an immune digital-pathology assay, in stage II CC patients. IS emerged as the sole significant parameter for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in high-risk patients. Moreover, IS effectively stratified patients who would benefit most from ACT based on their risk of recurrence, thus predicting their outcomes. Notably, our findings revealed that digital IS outperformed the visual quantitative assessment of the immune response conducted by expert pathologists. The latest edition of the WHO classification for digestive tumor has introduced the evaluation of the immune response, as assessed by IS, as desirable and essential diagnostic criterion. This supports the revision of current cancer guidelines and strongly recommends the implementation of IS into clinical practice as a patient stratification tool, to guide CC treatment decisions. This approach may provide appropriate personalized therapeutic decisions that could critically impact early-stage CC patient care.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Humanos , Neoplasias del Colon/inmunología , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Medición de Riesgo , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Pronóstico , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/inmunología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad
16.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10001, 2024 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693256

RESUMEN

Interval breast cancers are diagnosed between scheduled screenings and differ in many respects from screening-detected cancers. Studies comparing the survival of patients with interval and screening-detected cancers have reported differing results. The aim of this study was to investigate the radiological and histopathological features and growth rates of screening-detected and interval breast cancers and subsequent survival. This retrospective study included 942 female patients aged 50-69 years with breast cancers treated and followed-up at Kuopio University Hospital between January 2010 and December 2016. The screening-detected and interval cancers were classified as true, minimal-signs, missed, or occult. The radiological features were assessed on mammograms by one of two specialist breast radiologists with over 15 years of experience. A χ2 test was used to examine the association between radiological and pathological variables; an unpaired t test was used to compare the growth rates of missed and minimal-signs cancers; and the Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to examine survival after screening-detected and interval cancers. Sixty occult cancers were excluded, so a total of 882 women (mean age 60.4 ± 5.5 years) were included, in whom 581 had screening-detected cancers and 301 interval cancers. Disease-specific survival, overall survival and disease-free survival were all worse after interval cancer than after screening-detected cancer (p < 0.001), with a mean follow-up period of 8.2 years. There were no statistically significant differences in survival between the subgroups of screening-detected or interval cancers. Missed interval cancers had faster growth rates (0.47% ± 0.77%/day) than missed screening-detected cancers (0.21% ± 0.11%/day). Most cancers (77.2%) occurred in low-density breasts (< 25%). The most common lesion types were masses (73.9%) and calcifications (13.4%), whereas distortions (1.8%) and asymmetries (1.7%) were the least common. Survival was worse after interval cancers than after screening-detected cancers, attributed to their more-aggressive histopathological characteristics, more nodal and distant metastases, and faster growth rates.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Mamografía , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Mamografía/métodos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Finlandia/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad
17.
Clin Respir J ; 18(5): e13761, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693705

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In order to improve survival outcomes in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), strategies for neoadjuvant therapy need to be revisited. We evaluated and compared the efficacy of different neoadjuvant therapeutic modalities in a real-world setting. METHODS: A total of 258 patients with clinical stage IIA to IIIB NSCLC was included. All the patients underwent surgical resection after one to four cycles of neoadjuvant treatment consisting of chemotherapy (83), immunotherapy (23), and immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (152). RESULTS: The radiologic response rate in the combined immunochemotherapy group was 67.8%, higher than that of 48.2% in the chemotherapy group and 4.3% in the immunotherapy group (p < 0.001). An improved major pathological response (MPR) was also achieved in the combined therapy group compared with the chemotherapy group and the immunotherapy group (53.9% vs. 10.8% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001). Patients in the combined therapy group had a significant trend toward longer disease-free survival than those in the chemotherapy alone group (3-year disease-free survival [DFS] of 68.79% vs. 50.81%; hazard ratio [HR] for progression or death, 0.477; p = 0.003). Multivariate Cox analysis identified radical surgery (HR, 0.328; p = 0.033), ypN0-1 stage (HR, 0.591; p = 0.038) and MPR result (HR, 0.362; p = 0.007) to be independent prognostic factors for DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant treatment with a combination of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy appears to achieve higher radiological and pathological responses than monotherapy for IIA-IIIB NSCLC. Log-rank analysis showed that a better outcome could be expected in patients with the addition of immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy if compared with patients with chemotherapy alone in terms of DFS.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neumonectomía/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico
18.
Biometrics ; 80(2)2024 Mar 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708764

RESUMEN

When studying the treatment effect on time-to-event outcomes, it is common that some individuals never experience failure events, which suggests that they have been cured. However, the cure status may not be observed due to censoring which makes it challenging to define treatment effects. Current methods mainly focus on estimating model parameters in various cure models, ultimately leading to a lack of causal interpretations. To address this issue, we propose 2 causal estimands, the timewise risk difference and mean survival time difference, in the always-uncured based on principal stratification as a complement to the treatment effect on cure rates. These estimands allow us to study the treatment effects on failure times in the always-uncured subpopulation. We show the identifiability using a substitutional variable for the potential cure status under ignorable treatment assignment mechanism, these 2 estimands are identifiable. We also provide estimation methods using mixture cure models. We applied our approach to an observational study that compared the leukemia-free survival rates of different transplantation types to cure acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Our proposed approach yielded insightful results that can be used to inform future treatment decisions.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Estadísticos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Humanos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/mortalidad , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Causalidad , Biometría/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Simulación por Computador , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Análisis de Supervivencia
19.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10057, 2024 05 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698172

RESUMEN

This study aimed to evaluate the significance of homocysteine (HCY) levels in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This retrospective study involved 1272 CRC patients. The risk of mortality increased with increasing HCY levels in CRC patients. The optimal HCY cutoff value in CRC patients was 15.2 µmol/L. The RFS (45.8% vs. 60.5%, p < 0.001) and OS (48.2% vs. 63.2%, p < 0.001) of patients with high HCY levels were significantly lower than those of patients with low HCY levels. Patients with high HCY levels were older, male, had large tumours, high carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, and long hospital stays, and incurred high hospitalisation costs. Multivariate analysis showed that when HCY levels exceeded 15.2 µmol/L, the risk of adverse RFS and OS increased by 55.7% and 61.4%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that HCY levels could supplement CEA levels and pathological staging. We constructed HCY-based prognostic nomograms, which demonstrated feasible discrimination and calibration values better than the traditional tumour, node, metastasis staging system for predicting RFS and OS. Elevated serum HCY levels were strongly associated with poor RFS and OS in CRC patients. HCY-based prognostic models are effective tools for a comprehensive evaluation of prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Homocisteína , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/sangre , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Homocisteína/sangre , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pronóstico , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario/sangre , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/sangre , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Adulto , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Nomogramas
20.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 28(5): 672-678, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704205

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The common hepatic artery lymph node (CHALN) represents a second-echelon node for tumors in the head of the pancreas. Although early studies suggested survival was comparable between the CHALN and remote metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), whether the lymph node is associated with adverse survival remains equivocal. Here, we examined a prospective cohort of patients calculating actual survival to better understand implications of this specific lymph node metastasis. METHODS: We studied 215 patients with pancreatic head PDAC, who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies at a single institution between 2010 and 2017, wherein the CHALNs were excised. We performed actual and actuarial overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) analyses, with subsequent univariate and multivariate analyses in node-positive patients. RESULTS: Of this cohort, 7.3% of patients had involvement of the CHALN, and all of them had metastatic spread to first-echelon nodes. Actual median survival of patients with no lymph node involvement was 49 months. In patients with any nodal involvement, the survival was no different when comparing the lymph node positive and negative (13 and 20 months, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses likewise attached no significance to the lymph node metastasis, while demonstrating worse survival with positive margin status and poorly differentiated histology. Our DFS analyses yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in actual survival in node-positive patients regardless of the CHALN involvement and recommended against its assessment in prognosticating survival or guiding surgical treatment.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Arteria Hepática , Ganglios Linfáticos , Metástasis Linfática , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Humanos , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidad , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/secundario , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA