Soft tissue defect closure using an Ilizarov frame: a case series.

The Ilizarov technique is a well-known procedure for limb deformity corrections. However, in the present study, the purpose was to examine the potential of wound closure by means of an Ilizarov frame. Two main cases are presented, a further seven were retrospectively reviewed. The first case experienced a chronic wound at the tibial tuberosity. A fistula was excised followed by antibiotic therapy, however, dehiscence at the wound occurred for which an Ilizarov procedure was used. After two weeks the frame was removed and the wound was closed. The second patient underwent osteosynthesis of a tibia and fibula fracture but was complicated by infection. An Ilizarov device was applied for bone healing as well as the skin defect. Nine patients were included in total. Four of them attained enough skin length via the Ilizarov procedure for secondary closure. Three had the frame removed before having full wound covering and needed further granulation of the wound. Finally, two more patients underwent graft reconstruction. Three patients suffered from infectious complications. The gold standard in soft tissue closure remains skin or flap reconstruction, however, this is not advisable in poor overall health and decreased local vascularity. If an Ilizarov frame is present for bone reconstruction, it can simultaneously be used for skin closure. The results shown in the current study indicate that a satisfactory outcome can be achieved.

A systematic review and meta-analysis:comparing the efficacy of the Ilizarov technique alone with lengthening over a nail for lower extremity bone defects.

PURPOSE: The task faced by surgeons becomes significantly more challenging when they encounter lower extremity bone defects due to a variety of causes requiring lengthening. The most discussed and successful approach is the Illizarov technique, or lengthening over a nail (LON):distraction osteogenesis is also widely performed with monoliteral external fixators and intramedullarylengthening nails have increasingly been used in the last decade. METHODS: The data were collected from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and the Web of Science for all available studies comparing the outcomes of Ilizarov technique alone and LON technique (from January 1, 1997, to November 30, 2023). The outcomes of interest encompassed the external fixation index (EFI) (month/cm), mean duration of follow-up (MFT) (month), length gained (LG) (cm), consolidation index (CIx) (month/cm), and bone healing index (BHI) (month/cm).Complications include pin tract infection rate (PTI), axial deviation rate (AD), occurrence of intramedullary infection (II), delayed consolidation rate (DC), as well as data categorized into three levels of problems, obstacles, and sequelae based on the severity of complications.Two reviewers independently assessed each study for quality and extracted data. The case-control or respective cohort studies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) to determine their techniqueological rigor.The Cochrane Collaboration's risk assessment tool was employed to perform quality evaluations for randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: This review included thirteen studies comprising a total of 629 patients.The external fixation index (month/cm) was significantly smaller in the LON technique compared to the Ilizarov technique alone [Mean Difference(MD) = -29.59, 95% CI -39.68--19.49, P < 0.00001].In terms of the mean follow-up time(month) (MD = -0.92, 95% CI -3.49-1.65, P = 0.57), length gained (cm) (MD = -0.87, 95%CI -2.80-1.07, P = 0.38), consolidation index (month/cm) (MD = 0.66, 95% CI -3.44-4.77, P = 0.75), and bone healing index (month/cm) (MD = -3.33, 95% CI -13.07-6.41, P = 0.5), there were no significant differences observed. The LON technique exhibited a lower incidence of axial deviation [Odds Ratio(OR) = 0.06, 95%CI 0.03-0.16, P < 0.00001] and pin tract infection (OR = 0.30, 95%CI 0.18-0.50, P < 0.00001) compared to the Ilizarov technique alone.The remaining complications, such as intramedullary infection rate (OR = 0.93, 95%CI 0.42-2.06, P = 0.85) and delayed consolidation rate(OR = 0.61, 95%CI 0.20-1.86, P = 0.38), did not exhibit statistically significant differences.Our findings demonstrated that the LON technique results in lower incidences of problems (38.5%vs.58.6%) and sequelae (16.6% vs.30.9%) when compared to the Ilizarov technique alone. However, the rates of obstacles (32.4% vs.32.3%) were comparable between the two methods. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that patients treated with the LON technique experienced significantly shorter external fixation durations and a lower incidence of complications (e.g., pin tract infections and axial deviation) compared to those treated with the Ilizarov technique alone. Other outcome metrics showed no significant differences between the two techniques. However, the LON technique offers substantial benefits, including reduced external fixation times and increased comfort, which enhance patient compliance. In conclusion, the LON technique is a safe, reliable, and effective method for treating tibial and femoral defects.

Open segmental tibial bone defects treated with Ilizarov frame: a radiological and functional outcome study with average ten year follow-up.

PURPOSE: Surgical reconstruction of large post-traumatic tibial bone and soft tissue defects following high-energy trauma presents a significant challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. This study aimed to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of large post-traumatic tibial bone and soft tissue defects managed by single or double-level bone transport using the Ilizarov technique. MATERIAL & METHODS: 13 patients who underwent treatment for large tibial bone defects (Gustillo IIIa, IIIb, IIIc) along with soft tissue defects with Ilizarov from 2010 to 2020 A.D were included. ASAMI functional and radiological outcomes were assessed at the final follow-up to report the outcome. RESULTS: The mean age was 27.38 (18-48). An average bone defect was 7.69 cm (5-13 cm). Based upon the Gustillo-Anderson classification (GA), 2 (15%) of them were GA - 3 A, 7 (54%) were GA - 3B, and 4 (31%) were GA - 3 C. The average time of distraction was 11.76 weeks (8-16). The average time for the union was 37 weeks (27-48 weeks). The average bone lengthening was 7.69 cm (5-13 cm). The mean final leg length discrepancy (LLD) at the final follow-up was 1.96 cm (0-4 cm). The primary union was achieved in eight cases, and five required bone grafting at the docking site. Using the ASAMI (Association for the Study of the Method of Ilizarov) scoring system, the functional results were excellent in six and good in seven cases, while the bony results were excellent in eight, good in four and fair in one case. CONCLUSION: Good to excellent functional and radiological scores (ASAMI) can be expected when using the Ilizarov frame for simultaneous treatment of the large tibial bone and soft tissue defect when this method is applied with correct principles.

A dependent circular-linear model for multivariate biomechanical data: Ilizarov ring fixator study.

Biomechanical and orthopaedic studies frequently encounter complex datasets that encompass both circular and linear variables. In most cases (i) the circular and linear variables are considered in isolation with dependency between variables neglected and (ii) the cyclicity of the circular variables is disregarded resulting in erroneous decision making. Given the inherent characteristics of circular variables, it is imperative to adopt methods that integrate directional statistics to achieve precise modelling. This paper is motivated by the modelling of biomechanical data, that is, the fracture displacements, that is used as a measure in external fixator comparisons. We focus on a dataset, based on an Ilizarov ring fixator, comprising of six variables. A modelling framework applicable to the six-dimensional joint distribution of circular-linear data based on vine copulas is proposed. The pair-copula decomposition concept of vine copulas represents the dependence structure as a combination of circular-linear, circular-circular and linear-linear pairs modelled by their respective copulas. This framework allows us to assess the dependencies in the joint distribution as well as account for the cyclicity of the circular variables. Thus, a new approach for accurate modelling of mechanical behaviour for Ilizarov ring fixators and other data of this nature is imparted.

[Ilizarov technique combined with center of rotation dome-shaped osteotomy for the treatment of juvenile distal femoral valgus deformity].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of Ilizarov technique combined with rotational center dome-shaped osteotomy in the treatment of juvenile distal femoral valgus deformity. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 11 patients with valgus deformity of the distal femur who had been admitted and followed up completely from January 2016 to October 2020. There were 7 males and 4 females. The 6 patients were on the right side and 5 patients were on the left side. The age ranged from 10 to 14 years old. The center of roration of angulation(CORA) was identified at the distal femur deformity, and dome-shaped osteotomy was performed with the CORA as the midpoint. The annular external fixator was installed according to the needle threading principle of Ilizarov external fixation, and the distal femur was cut off. The valgus deformity under visual inspection of the distal femur was corrected immediately, and the external fixator was fixed and maintained. The residual deformity and shortening were corrected according to the force line and length of the lower limbs suggested by the weight-bearing full-length anteroposterior and lateral X-rays of both lower limbs. RESULTS: All 11 patients were followed up for 13 to 25 months. The time of wearing external fixator was 12 to 17 weeks. In the last follow-up, both lower limbs were measured by the weight-bearing full-length anteroposterior and lateral X-rays, and the length of both lower limbs of 11 patients were equal, and the deformities were corrected. The score of hospital for special surgery (HSS) was used to evaluate the knee function, all of which were excellent. CONCLUSION: The Ilizarov technique was applied in the treatment of distal femoral valgus deformity in adolescents using a rotating central dome-shaped osteotomy. Visual femoral valgus deformity was corrected immediately during the operation. After the operation, residual deformities and shortening were dynamically adjusted and corrected according to the force line and shortening degree of lower extremities indicated by the weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of both lower limbs, with minimal damage and fast recovery.

Bone Bridge Transtibial Amputation by an Innovative Technique.

We present a case report of synostosis after transtibial amputation because of distraction regenerate formation after decortication of the lateral surfaces of the tibia and fibula, sequential compression, and distraction using the Ilizarov apparatus. Its advantage is that there is no need to shorten bone. The establishment of distal tibia-fibula synostosis (Ertl) in patients with transtibial amputation has been advocated to improve function and prosthetic wear. There are a variety of techniques to create a bone block. This case reports the successful use of an innovative technique to establish bone block. A patient with transtibial amputation underwent revision of residual limb by decorticating the lateral aspect of the distal tibia and the medial aspect of the distal fibula and acutely compressing the distal ends of the 2 bones with the Ilizarov apparatus. The distal fibula is then slowly and progressively distracted laterally, and the bone is formed in the space between the distal fibula and tibia, creating synostosis with an increased distal bone cross-sectional surface area for improved function and prosthetic wear. The follow-up period was 24 months. Within 3 months, synostosis was formed, which increased the area of the supporting surface and allowed temporary and then permanent prosthetics. After 24 months, synostosis did not differ from the structure of tibial stump bones.

Midterm Results after Tibiotalar or Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion Using an Ilizarov External Fixator.

Background: Ankle fusion is considered a treatment of choice for end-stage ankle arthritis when a total ankle replacement procedure is not indicated. However, the potential risk of secondary arthritis in the adjacent joint after ankle fusion raises arguments on whether preserving the adjacent joint during an isolated tibiotalar (TT) fusion brings about any future benefits with regard to pain and gait discomfort. In this study, we intended to present midterm results following TT or tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator and to investigate whether spontaneous fusion occurred in the subtalar or midtarsal joint. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study. Medical records of patients who underwent TT or TTC fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator for substantial bone defects around the ankle joint between 1994 and 2018 were manually searched. Forty-one patients were included and the status of the joints adjacent to the fusion site was evaluated in radiographic examinations. Results: Of the 34 patients who underwent TT fusion, 30 patients (88.3%) had a spontaneous fusion in the adjacent joints. Specifically, 11 patients (29.4%) had subtalar joint fusion and 19 patients (55.9%) had both midtarsal joint and subtalar joint fusion. In TTC fusion, the midtarsal joint was spontaneously fused in all 7 patients. Conclusions: In this study, we observed spontaneous adjacent joint fusion following TT or TTC fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator for substantial bone defects around the ankle joint. Although a careful approach should be made since patients treated in this study may not represent typical candidates that need primary joint-sacrificing procedures, we believe that this study may draw attention from surgeons concerned about the fate of the adjacent joint status after TT or TTC fusion.

Long-term results of treatment of Gustilo-Anderson type 3A-B tibia fractures due to combat-related high-energy ballistic injuries treated with external circular fixator: Experience of the Military Medical Academy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the longterm outcomes of open tibia fractures treated using the Ilizarov external circular fixation (ECF) technique in the Military Medical Academy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1992 and December 2011, a total of 134 male military personnel (median age: 22.5 years; range, 18 to 36 years) with Gustilo-Anderson type 3 open tibia fractures treated with ECF were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent multiple surgeries and eventually Ilizarov fixation surgery. The radiological and functional outcomes were evaluated using the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria, and complications were noted. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 17.7 (range, 10 to 29) years. The median time to union was 4.7 (range, 3 to 8) months. All frames were removed from the limb, when union was observed. No re-fracture, limb length discrepancy more than 2.5 cm, or below-knee amputation after Ilizarov treatment was seen in any patient. Chronic osteomyelitis was observed at in 40% (n=54) of the patients at a median time ranging from 17 to 148 months. The overall ASAMI bone scores were excellent in 40 (30%), good in 20 (15%), fair in 20 (15%), and poor in 54 (40%) patients with osteomyelitis. The ASAMI functional scores were excellent in 40 (30%), good in 40 (30%), and fair in 54 patients (40%). No poor score was observed. Minor pin site infections were observed in 63 patients (47%). CONCLUSION: Our long-term study results showed that all patients returned to their social life and were mobilized without support after treatment with the use of Ilizarov ECF method of open tibia fractures caused by high-energy ballistic injuries. However, complications such as pin tract infections and osteomyelitis after several years must be kept in mind in the treatment of comminuted bone fractures caused by firearms and ballistic missiles injuries.

First metatarsal shortening after hallux valgus surgery: Benefits of treatment with distraction osteogenesis.

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic shortening and elevation of the first metatarsal (MT1) is a common complication of hallux valgus surgery, inducing metatarsalgia underneath the lesser rays, a reason for patient dissatisfaction. For resolving this problem, different types of revision surgery are described, of which lengthening MT1 by distraction osteogenesis is underreported and therefore undervalued. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present three cases with iatrogenic shortening after hallux valgus surgery treated by distraction osteogenesis of MT1 using a custom-made frame, made of Ilizarov equipment. To evaluate the amount of lengthening, the length of the first and second metatarsal (MT2) and the parabolic distribution of the metatarsal heads were compared before and after distraction. To evaluate correction in the sagittal plane, Meary's angle was measured pre- and post-lengthening. Pain was noted by a visual analogic score during follow-up. RESULTS: In our series of three cases, lengthening of MT1 between 7 mm and 18 mm, resulted in an improved parabolic distribution of the MT heads. The average difference between the second and first MT-head, relative to the SM4 axis (M2-M1) improved from 9.4 mm (± 0.9 mm) to 2.8 mm (± 0.7 mm) resolving corresponding pain in all patients. Meary's angle was normalized in one case. The average duration of treatment was 116 days (± 9 days). Minimal follow up was 11 years. CONCLUSION: Using Ilizarov equipment for distraction osteogenesis of MT1 is a low-cost and effective method. Over time, this technique has proven its utility in pronounced iatrogenic shortening of MT1. The possibility to lengthen more than 1 cm, to correct in multiple planes, as well as early mobilization and weight bearing are additional advantages, but one must be careful to avoid overcorrection. The need for strict follow-up with multiple radiographs and rigorous patient selection is mandatory.

["Calcaneogenesis" with secondary Achilles tendon-bone allograft for repair of the loss of hindfoot function : A 12-year case report]. / "Kalkanogenese" mit sekundärer Achillessehnen-Knochenblock-Alloplastik zur Wiedergewinnung der Rückfußfunktion : Eine 12-Jahres-Kasuistik.

BACKGROUND: Calcanectomy and Achilles tendon resection are very hard to repair. OBJECTIVE: Ilizarov's "calcaneogenesis" is possible with ankle joint preservation. Even after 3.5 years of functio laesa of the triceps surae muscle it can be rebuilt. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 25-year-old motorcyclist suffered a 3rd degree open calcaneal dislocation fracture (type 5). Osteitis and necrosis required calcanectomy, resection of the Achilles tendon and a latissimus dorsi muscle transfer. A talus corpus osteotomy with Ilizarov distraction created in the 1st step a "neo-calcaneus". In a delayed 2nd step a fresh-frozen Achilles tendon-bone block allograft was transplanted to regain active plantar flexion. RESULTS: The initial AOFAS score of 35 points was significantly improved to 70 points 12 years after step 1. After both operations the patient could walk without an orthosis and regained 88% of normal plantar flexion strength. Quantitative measure of health outcome according to EQ-5D-5L was marked by the patient with 80 out of 100 points. DISCUSSION: "Calcaneogenesis" with preservation of the ankle joint is possible and innovative. Despite 3.5 years of disconnection of the triceps surae muscle, an Achilles tendon-bone block allograft could restore 88% of the push-off force even attached to a neo-calcaneus that is 1/3 smaller than normal, which is also new.

Management strategies for Docking Site refractures: a comparative analysis of 19 patient cases.

AIMS: This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of intramedullary nailing (IMN), percutaneous external plate fixation (PEPF), and re-applied external fixation (REF) in the treatment of refracture at the consolidated docking site following the removal of external fixation in patients with tibial defects who had previously undergone the Ilizarov bone transport technique. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients who received IMN, PEPF, or REF for refracture at the consolidated docking site subsequent to the removal of external fixation. A collection of data was made regarding the following parameters: age, gender, defect size, treatment methods, external fixation time (EFT), external fixation index (EFI), time of refracture (TOR) subsequent to fixation removal, and docking reunion time (DRT). Bone and functional outcomes were evaluated by the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) questionnaire. RESULTS: The study included 14 males and 5 females with an average age of 38.1 ± 8.9 years (range, 26 to 55 years). Etiologies included post-traumatic osteomyelitis in 11 cases and post-traumatic bone loss in 8 cases. The median bone defect was 5.11 ± 0.87 cm (range, 3.8 to 6.8 cm). Following docking site refracture, 6 cases were treated with IMN, 8 with PEPF, and 5 with REF. All patients achieved both satisfactory bone union and functional outcomes, and there was no significant difference in preoperative baseline data or postoperative outcomes among the three groups. CONCLUSION: IMN, PEPF, and REF were all demonstrated favorable postoperative bone and functional outcomes, suggesting their reliability as treatment options for managing docking site refracture following external fixation removal.

Nomogram construction and validation of axial deviation in patients with tibial defects treated with the Ilizarov bone transport technique.

INTRODUCTION: The Ilizarov bone transport technique is widely recognised as an effective method for treating large segment bone defects in clinical practice. However, axial deviation is a common complication in the treatment of tibial large segment bone defects, which can have a serious impact on the clinical efficacy of bone transport. Our study aims to construct and validate a nomogram for predicting axial deviation of tibial bone transport. METHOD: This study retrospectively collected data from 363 patients who underwent the tibial Ilizarov technique for bone transport. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent risk factors for axial deviation, which were later used to construct a nomogram. The nomogram was evaluated using the decision curve analysis (DCA), the calibration curve, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Of the 363 patients who underwent Ilizarov tibial bone transport, 31.7% (115/363) experienced axial deviation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gender, height, defect site, and external fixation index were important risk factors for axial deviation. The AUC value of the nomogram model was 0.705. The calibration curve and the decision curve analysis showed a good consistency between the actual axial deviation and the predicted probability. CONCLUSION: The model assigns a quantitative risk score to each variable, which can be used to predict the risk of axial deviation during tibial bone transport.

Radiographic and functional results of Ilizarov fixation in the management of nonunion of tibia and femur fractures: a retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Femoral and tibial fractures may result in delayed union and nonunion, posing significant challenges in orthopedic practice. The Ilizarov technique has emerged as a promising solution for managing these complex cases. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the radiographic and functional results of Ilizarov fixation in the treatment of nonunion of tibia and femur fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTINGS: Hospitals affiliated with a university hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, and treatment details were analyzed for the period from October 2015 to September 2022 in patients who were treated for nonunion of the tibia and femur using the Ilizarov fixator. Clinical and radiological assessments were performed using the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria. The study focused on assessing the average duration for union and frame removal, bone results, successful union rates, and functional results using the ASAMI criteria, obtaining data from the existing medical records, spanning various medical facilities treating nonunion fractures. SAMPLE SIZE: 126 patients. RESULTS: The average duration for union and frame removal was 8 months, with excellent bone results observed in 60.32% of cases. Out of 126 patients, 118 achieved successful union, while there were 2 failure cases necessitating amputation (1.52%). Functional results revealed excellent outcomes in 39.68% of cases. Complications included pin tract infections, ankle and knee stiffness, and limb shortening. External fixation duration and infection eradication were consistent with previous research, emphasizing the technique's effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The Ilizarov technique proved highly effective in managing nonunion tibia and femur fractures, offering favorable outcomes in terms of union, infection control, pain relief, and functional recovery. While excellent bone outcomes do not guarantee optimal function, this method remains a reliable approach for complex cases. LIMITATIONS: Potential biases inherent in retrospective analyses and the need for further randomized controlled trials to comprehensively compare treatment modalities.

Correction of Equinus Deformity by Ilizarov Frame Using the Matsushita Method and Achilles Tendon Lengthening: A Case Report.

CASE: The patient was an 18-year-old man who had sustained diaphyseal fractures of the left femur and tibia in a traffic accident and underwent surgery at another hospital. A severe left foot equinovarus deformity developed in the early after surgery. The patient's left foot deformity was addressed using unconstrained gradual external fixator correction (the Matsushita method) in combination with soft-tissue contracture through Achilles tendon lengthening and was maintained after removing the external fixation. CONCLUSION: The Matsushita method can be effective in the correction of post-traumatic equinovarus foot deformities.

Masquelet combined with free-flap technique versus the Ilizarov bone transport technique for severe composite tibial and soft-tissue defects.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of bone and soft-tissue defects after open fractures remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the Masquelet technique combined with the free-flap technique (MFFT) versus the Ilizarov bone transport technique (IBTT) for the treatment of severe composite tibial and soft-tissue defects. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the data of 65 patients with tibial and soft-tissue defects and Gustilo type IIIB/C open fractures treated at our hospital between April 2015 and December 2021. The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment method: group A (n = 35) was treated with the MFFT and internal fixation, and group B (n = 30) was treated with the IBTT. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 28 months (range 13-133 months). Complete union of both soft-tissue and bone defects was achieved in all cases. The mean bone-union times were 6 months (range 3-12 months) in group A and 11 months (range 6-23 month) in group B, with a significant difference between the two groups (Z = -4.11, P = 0.001). The mean hospital stay was 28 days (range 14-67 d) in group A which was significantly longer than the mean stay of 18 days (range 10-43 d) in group B (Z = -2.608, P = 0.009). There were no significant differences in the infection rate between group A (17.1 %) and group B (26.7%) (χ2 = 0.867, P = 0.352). The Total Physical Health Scores were 81.51 ± 6.86 (range 67-90) in group A and 75.83±16.14 (range 44-98) in group B, with no significant difference between the two groups (t = 1.894, P = 0.063). The Total Mental Health Scores were significantly higher in group A (90.49 ± 6.37; range 78-98) than in group B (84.70 ± 13.72; range 60-98) (t = 2.232, P = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Compared with IBTT, MFFT is a better choice of treatment for open tibial and soft-tissue defects with Gustilo IIIB/C fractures. IBTT is the preferred option when the tibial bone defect is large or if the surgeon's expertise in microsurgery is limited.

The Clinical Application of Double Taylor Spatial Frame in Segmental Tibial Fracture.

OBJECTIVES: Multi-planar external fixation has been used for the management of segmental tibial fractures with severe soft tissue injuries. However, fewer specialized studies have been reported. The primary aim of this study was to describe our experience of treating fractures of this type using the Taylor Spatial Frame and Ilizarov external fixation methods. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 33 patients with segmental tibial fracture treated at our institution between January 2016 and December 2020. The patients were divided into double Taylor Spatial Frame (D-TSF) and Ilizarov groups based on the external fixation structure. Baseline demographic data included sex, age, injury side and cause, open or closed fracture, time from injury to surgery, complications, and external frame removal and fracture healing time. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was measured from preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up full-length X-rays of bilateral lower limbs. We determined the degree of deviation in the HKA by calculating the difference between the measured angle and the ideal value of 180°; the absolute value was used to assess recovery of the lower limb force line. At the final follow-up, Johner-Wruhs tibial fracture outcome criteria (J-W TFOC) were used to classify the postoperative function of the affected limb as excellent, good, moderate, or poor. Count data were analyzed with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test; the Mann-Whitney U test was used for rank data. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of sex, age, side of injury, cause of injury, closed or open fracture, or time between injury and surgery, which indicates that the groups were comparable (p > 0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed in external frame removal and fracture healing time between the D-TSF and Ilizarov groups (36.24 ± 8.34 vs 45.42 ± 10.21 weeks, p = 0.009; 33.33 ± 8.21 vs 42.00 ± 9.78 weeks, p = 0.011). The Johner-Wruhs criteria were used to assess the function of the affected limb, the D-TSF group performed better in correcting the lower limb force line than the Ilizarov group. A statistically significant difference in terms of excellent ratings was observed between the two groups (18/2/1/0 vs 5/5/1/1, p = 0.010). Postoperative follow-up X-rays demonstrated a significant improvement in the HKA in both groups immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up compared to the angle before surgery. At the final follow-up, a statistically significant difference was observed in the degree of deviation in the HKA between the two groups (1.58° ± 0.84° vs 2.37° ± 1.00°, p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: The D-TSF treatment is associated with minimal secondary damage to soft tissue, a straightforward and minimally invasive procedure, multiplanar stable fracture fixation, and optimization of fracture alignment and lower limb force lines, therefore, it is highly effective therapeutic option for segmental tibial fracture.

Is it possible to achieve multiplanar correction of complex deformities around the knee in children and adolescents using a monolateral external fixator?

PURPOSE: To present the technique of correction of multiplanar deformities around the knee in children and adolescents using the monolateral external fixator. Also, to evaluate the results of the technique regarding radiological correction, time to union, and possible complications. METHODS: A total of 29 patients (47 limbs) were prospectively included in the study (14 males and 15 females). Their median age was 13 years (range, 7-17). All patients had at least a 2-plane deformity around the knee which was corrected using a monolateral external fixator. The primary outcome measure was deformity correction (correction of mechanical axis deviation (MAD) in both the coronal and sagittal planes with correction of rotational deformities). The secondary outcome measures included bony union, radiographic, and functional results (assessed by using the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) score). RESULTS: The median pre-operative MAD improved from 6.3 to 0.4 cm post-operatively. According to the ASAMI scoring system, the radiographic scoring was excellent in all cases (100%), and the functional scoring was excellent in 22 cases (89.7%) and good in three cases (10.3%). CONCLUSION: The simple monolateral fixator can be an effective tool for multiplanar correction of complex deformities around the knee without limb length discrepancy.

Analysis of modified ilib therapy in patients submitted to plastic surgery.

The sample comprised 44 volunteers who had undergone some surgical procedure and were equally divided into four groups. G1 started the therapy 24 h after the surgical procedure with the device off. G2 followed the same time pattern, 24 h, but with the device turned on. G3 and G4 started therapy three days after the surgical procedure; in G3, the device was turned off, and in G4, the device remained on during therapy; each session lasted 30 min, using 660 nm (red), energy 180 J. For all groups, the therapy started with daily use for seven days and followed the interval use of three times a week until completed 21 days. The revaluation was performed after 7 and 21 days. The results found show changes in HR at rest, systolic and diastolic BP, and in peripheral oxygen saturation, which showed a significant difference in the groups that used on-therapy (p < 0.05). In the MCGILL Scale evaluation, the mean total score showed a more accentuated drop in the groups that used ILIB, (p < 0.05). ILIB may have prevented a more significant evolution of firosis levels; however, no changes were observed in the evaluation of sleep and anxiety. The application of the ILIB in patients undergoing plastic surgery was supported in terms of hemodynamics and pain; in addition, starting the ILIB application 24 h after the procedure proved to be more advantageous.

Semi-focal bone transport versus traditional bone transport technique for the management of large tibial bone defects after trauma.

How to deal with large tibial bone defects is still controversial. The purpose of this research was to compare the semi-focal bone transport (SFBT) technique with traditional bone transport (TBT) technique for treating such patients. Sixty-two patients were included and retrospectively analyzed. In all cases, after radical debridement large tibial bone defects remained. Patients were treated by the SFBT or TBT technique. The distraction, consolidation duration and complications were recorded by the patients' medical files. Based on the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) standard, the bone and functional results were evaluated. The mean bone defect size was 7.7 ± 1.6 cm and 7.5 ± 2.1 cm for SFBT and TBT patients. The mean external fixation index (EFI) was 1.51 ± 0.14 months/cm and 1.89 ± 0.25 months/cm for SFBT and TBT patients (p < 0.05), respectively. With respect to bone and function results, there was no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). The mean number of complications per patient was 1.1 ± 0.6 and 1.6 ± 0.7 for SFBT and TBT patients (p < 0.05). Compared to the traditional bone transport technique, patients using the semi-focal bone transport technique achieved better clinical effects, including shorter EFI and less complications. Therefore, the SFBT technique could be a new option for patients with large tibial bone defects.

To Explore the Clinical Application Value of the Ilizarov Bone Handling Technique in the Treatment of Tibial Bone Defects Caused by Osteomyelitis Segmental Resection.

Objective: To study the application value of Ilizarov bone handling technology in the treatment of tibial bone defect caused by osteomyelitis segmental resection. Methods: 78 patients with tibial bone defects after osteomyelitis segmental resection admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed and assigned to the Ilizarov bone handling group (38 cases) and the fibular segmental transplantation group (40 cases). The perioperative indexes between the groups were compared (external fixation time, complete weight-bearing time, and intraoperative bleeding volume). The ankle function and knee function of patients were assessed before and 6 months after treatment and the occurrence of postoperative complications were counted. Results: The external fixation time and full weight-bearing time in the Ilizarov bone handling group were significantly shorter than those in the fibular segment transplantation group, and the intraoperative bleeding was less, with statistically significant differences (P < .05). Compared to the pre-treatment period, Baird's scores and HHS scores of the patients in both groups increased significantly after 6 months of treatment, and both scores in the Ilizarov bone handling group were significantly higher than those in the fibular segment transplantation group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < .05). The postoperative complication statistics showed that the complication rate of the Ilizarov bone handling group was significantly lower than that of the fibular segment transplantation group (P < .05). Conclusion: The Ilizarov bone transfer technique is less invasive than the fibular bone grafting technique used in the treatment of patients with osteomyelitis segmental resection-induced tibial bone defects, with the former having the advantages of less traumatization, faster recovery of the patients, better recovery of knee and ankle functions, and fewer complications, which is of high value for clinical application.