A deep learning approach to direct immunofluorescence pattern recognition in autoimmune bullous diseases.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping healthcare, using machine and deep learning (DL) to enhance disease management. Dermatology has seen improved diagnostics, particularly in skin cancer detection, through the integration of AI. However, the potential of AI in automating immunofluorescence imaging for autoimmune bullous skin diseases (AIBDs) remains untapped. While direct immunofluorescence (DIF) supports diagnosis, its manual interpretation can hinder efficiency. The use of DL to classify DIF patterns automatically, including the intercellular (ICP) and linear pattern (LP), holds promise for improving the diagnosis of AIBDs. OBJECTIVES: To develop AI algorithms for automated classification of AIBD DIF patterns, such as ICP and LP, in order to enhance diagnostic accuracy, streamline disease management and improve patient outcomes through DL-driven immunofluorescence interpretation. METHODS: We collected immunofluorescence images from skin biopsies of patients suspected of having an AIBD between January 2022 and January 2024. Skin tissue was obtained via a 5-mm punch biopsy, prepared for DIF. Experienced dermatologists classified the images as ICP, LP or negative. To evaluate our DL approach, we divided the images into training (n = 436) and test sets (n = 93). We employed transfer learning with pretrained deep neural networks and conducted fivefold cross-validation to assess model performance. Our dataset's class imbalance was addressed using weighted loss and data augmentation strategies. The models were trained for 50 epochs using Pytorch, achieving an image size of 224 × 224 pixels for both convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and the Swin Transformer. RESULTS: Our study compared six CNNs and the Swin Transformer for AIBD image classification, with the Swin Transformer achieving the highest average validation accuracy (98.5%). On a separate test set, the best model attained an accuracy of 94.6%, demonstrating 95.3% sensitivity and 97.5% specificity across AIBD classes. Visualization with Grad-CAM (class activation mapping) highlighted the model's reliance on characteristic patterns for accurate classification. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted the accuracy of CNNs in identifying DIF features. This approach aids automated analysis and reporting, offering reproducibility, speed, data handling and cost-efficiency. Integrating DL into skin immunofluorescence promises precise diagnostics and streamlined reporting in this branch of dermatology.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare through machine and deep learning (computer systems that can learn and adapt, and make complex decisions, without receiving explicit instructions), improving disease management in dermatology, particularly in detecting skin cancer. However, AI's potential in automating immunofluorescence imaging in autoimmune bullous (blistering) skin diseases (AIBDs) remains largely untapped. Manual interpretation of direct immunofluorescence (DIF ­ a type of microscopy) can reduce efficiency. However, using deep learning to automatically classify DIF patterns (for example, the 'intercellular pattern' (ICP) and the 'linear pattern' (LP)) holds promise in helping with the diagnosis of AIBDs. This study aimed to develop AI algorithms for the automated classification of AIBD DIF patterns, such as ICP and LP, to improve diagnostic accuracy and streamline disease management. Immunofluorescence images were collected from skin biopsies of patients with a suspected AIBD between January 2022 and January 2024. Dermatologists classified the images into three categories: ICP, LP and negative. The dataset was divided into training (436 images) and test sets (93 images). A transfer learning framework (where what has been learned previously in one setting is used to improve performance in another) was used to make up for the limited amount of training data, to explore different models for the AIBD classification task. Our results revealed that a model called the 'Swin Transformer' achieved an average accuracy of 99% in diagnosing different AIBDs. The best model attained 95% accuracy on the test set and was reliable in identifying and ruling out different AIBDs. Visualization with Grad-CAM (a technique used in deep learning) highlighted the model's use of characteristic patterns to classify the diseases accurately. Overall, integrating deep learning in skin immunofluorescence promises to improve diagnostics and streamline reporting in dermatology, which could improve consistency, speed and cost-efficiency.

Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) versus immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of complements and immunoglobulins (Ig) in pemphigus group.

INTRODUCTION: Pemphigus is a group of bullous disorders of the skin characterized by the formation of autoantibodies present in the intercellular junction of the epidermis. Diagnosis is made by clinical, histopathological examination, and DIF. As DIF needs frozen sections, fluorescent tagged antibodies, UV light microscope for examination, and trained personnel, its non-availability makes a definitive diagnosis challenging. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of IHC staining of complements and Ig in cases of Pemphigus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six diagnosed cases of Pemphigus were stained by Peroxidase immunohistochemical method using monoclonal antibody to IgG, IgA, IgM, IgG4, C3, C4 d with DAB as chromogen. Pemphigus cases include twenty of pemphigus vulgaris (PV), four cases of pemphigus foliaceous (PF), and two of pemphigus vegetans (Pveg). Positivity was defined as the deposition of Ig and complements as distinct, continuous brown staining of keratinocytes at intercellular junctions. RESULT: On IHC total of 20 PV 17 showed positivity (85%) for IgG, 11 (55%) C4d, 19 (95%) C3d, and 16 (80%) IgG4 deposits at the intercellular junction of the epidermis. All cases of PF showed a deposit of IgG, with three (75%) cases for IgG4, C3d, and C4d. Both cases of Pveg showed positivity for IgG and C4d while one case was negative for IgG4 and C3d. The overall IgG, C3, IgG4, and C4d expression for pemphigus was seen in 88%, 88%, 76.9%, and 61.5% of cases. The relation between these markers, combination of IgG and C3, was best related to each other ( P value = 0.80). The sensitivities for IgG, IgG4, and C3 were 77.8%%, 73%, and 73% resp. CONCLUSION: We conclude that IHC is a useful tool in the diagnosis of PV with the highest sensitivity of IgG and C3d. The combination of IgG and C3d could replace the DIF in almost all of our cases, so IHC on FFPE sections be used as an alternative method to DIF.

Direct Immunofluorescence Findings and Factors Affecting Conjunctival Biopsy Positivity in Ocular Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the direct immunofluorescence (DIF) findings and factors affecting conjunctival biopsy positivity in patients clinically diagnosed with ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (OMMP). METHODS: This retrospective observational case series included patients with clinical OMMP who underwent conjunctival biopsy for DIF in at least 1 eye between 2018 and 2021 in an institutional setting. The primary outcome measures were association of age and chronic ocular complications with biopsy positivity. RESULTS: Of 61 patients, DIF positivity was seen in 33 (54.1%) clinically suspected cases of OMMP. Of 39 patients who underwent bilateral biopsy, 23 (59%) were positive, of which 12 (52%) were positive in both eyes while 11 (48%) were positive in 1 eye. Of 22 patients who underwent unilateral biopsy, 10 (45%) were positive. Of the 100 biopsied eyes, 45 (45%) were DIF positive. Among the immunoreactants studied, linear deposition of C3 was seen in all 45 positive eyes (100%). Increasing age was significantly associated with higher likelihood of biopsy negativity ( P = 0.032), whereas a greater Sotozono chronic ocular complication score, indicative of disease severity, was associated with low likelihood of biopsy positivity ( P = 0.0042) and lower overall expression of immunoreactants on DIF ( P = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients and patients with more severe ocular surface disease sequelae are likely to have negative DIF results. To optimize the chances of confirming the diagnosis of OMMP by DIF, both eyes should be biopsied early in the disease course. If 1 eye is being biopsied, the less affected eye must be chosen.

Survey: Preferred practice patterns in the diagnosis of mucous membrane pemphigoid amongst cornea specialists.

PURPOSE: To evaluate preferred diagnostic tools and treatment decision-making factors in cases suspicious of mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) amongst ophthalmologists and cornea specialists. METHODS: Web-based survey, consisting of 14 multiple choice questions, posted to the Cornea Society Listserv Keranet, the Canadian Ophthalmological Society Cornea Listserv, and the Bowman Club Listserv. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight ophthalmologists participated in the survey. Eighty-six percent (86%) of respondents were cornea trained and practiced in either North America or Europe (83%). Most respondents (72%) routinely perform conjunctival biopsies for all suspicious cases of MMP. For those who do not, fear that biopsy will exacerbate inflammation was the most common reason to defer investigation (47%). Seventy-one percent (71%) performed biopsies from perilesional sites. Ninety-seven percent (97%) ask for direct (DIF) studies and 60% for histopathology in formalin. Most do not recommend biopsy at other non-ocular sites (75%), nor do they perform indirect immunofluorescence for serum autoantibodies (68%). Immune-modulatory therapy is started following positive biopsy results for most (66%), albeit most (62%) would not let a negative DIF influence the choice of starting treatment should there be clinical suspicion of MMP. Differences in practice patterns as they relate to level of experience and geographical location are contrasted to the most up-to-date available guidelines. CONCLUSION: Responses to the survey suggest that there is heterogeneity in certain practice patterns for MMP. Biopsy remains an area of controversy in dictating treatment plans. Identified areas of need should be targeted in future research.

C3d Immunohistochemical Staining on Paraffin-Embedded Tissue for Diagnosis of Pemphigus.

CONTEXT.­: Pemphigus is an autoimmune blister disease that causes blisters on the skin and mucosal surfaces. Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) testing is critical for the clinical diagnosis of pemphigus. However, it is limited to fresh tissue specimens and fluorescence microscopy. OBJECTIVE.­: To assess the value of C3d immunohistochemistry (IHC) on paraffin-embedded skin tissue for the diagnosis of pemphigus by comparing C3d-IHC results to DIF and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay testing in pemphigus and other blister-related skin diseases. DESIGN.­: C3d-IHC assays were retrospectively performed on paraffin-embedded skin tissue sections from 115 patients (63 with pemphigus and 52 controls). Both the case group and the control group underwent the same protocol, and cases with C3d position in the peripheral spinous layer were considered as positive samples. RESULTS.­: C3d-IHC and DIF testing had similar performance for pemphigus diagnosis, with a sensitivity of 71.0% (95% CI, 51.8%-85.1%) and 77.4% (95% CI, 58.5%-89.7%), specificity of 96.4% (95% CI, 79.8%-99.8%) and 100% (95% CI, 85.0%-100%), positive predictive value of 95.7% (95% CI, 76.0%-99.8%) and 100% (95% CI, 82.8%-100%), and a negative predictive value of 75.0% (95% CI, 57.5%-87.3%) and 80.0% (95% CI, 62.5%-90.9%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS.­: Our study indicated that C3d-IHC results for paraffin-fixed tissues were not significantly different from DIF results for the diagnosis of pemphigus. The C3d-IHC assay has the potential for routine diagnosis of pemphigus, especially in the absence of fresh-frozen tissue.

[Diagnostics of ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid]. / Diagnostik des okulären Schleimhautpemphigoids.

The diagnosis of ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) remains a challenge as the timing and choice of diagnostic methods have a decisive influence on its quality. A systematic approach is required that includes a comprehensive medical history, critical evaluation of the clinical findings and targeted laboratory testing. The diagnosis is complicated by the fact that some patients present purely clinically the symptoms of MMP without fulfilling the required immunohistochemical and laboratory criteria. Basically, the diagnosis of ocular MMP is based on three pillars: 1) medical history and clinical findings, 2) positive immunohistological (direct immunofluorescence) tissue sample and 3) specific serological autoantibodies. As the diagnosis of ocular MMP often implies prolonged systemic immunomodulatory treatment in predominantly older patients, the accurate diagnosis and approach are of critical relevance. The aim of this article is to present the recently updated diagnostic procedure.

Cutaneous Vesiculobullous Lesions: A Clinicopathologic Study.

Vesiculobullous disorders could be either immunobullous or non-immunobullous. The spectrum was analyzed using histopathology, direct immunofluorescence (DIF), and salt-split technique. Among the 104 patients analyzed, 77 (74%) were immunobullous and 25 (24%) were having non-immunobullous diseases. Bullous pemphigoid (20.2%) is the commonest among immunobullous lesions, and epidermolysis bullosa (11.5%) was the most frequent non-immunobullous lesion. Involvement of the hair and nail and a positive family history were common relationships for non-immunobullous disorders. Immunobullous lesions showed DIF positivity whereas non-immunobullous lesions were DIF negative. Perilesional DIF was more sensitive and specific than lesional DIF. The commonest antibody was immunoglobulin G (IgG) (78.9%) followed by complement 3c (C3c) (38.1%), immunoglobulin A (IgA) (25%), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) (6.6%). No lesion should be considered non-immunobullous unless both lesional and perilesional DIF results were negative.

A comparative study of direct fluorescent antibody, mouse inoculation, and tissue culture infection testing for rabies diagnoses.

The laboratory diagnosis of rabies is of fundamental importance to the evaluation of suspected cases of rabies virus (RABV) infection. Confirmation of direct fluorescent antibody test (DFAT) results via viral isolation (VI) is recommended, and the mouse inoculation test (MIT) is being replaced by the rabies tissue culture infection (RTCIT) test for ethical reasons. We evaluated 6.514 results from central nervous system (CNS) samples of different animals analyzed at the Pasteur Institute between 2008 and 2016 using the DFAT, RTCIT and MIT techniques and evaluated their concordance, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy indices. The DFAT technique presented the best sensitivity (93.58 %), specificity (95.90 %), and accuracy (95.67 %) results. The RTCIT values of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (70.42 %, 86.16 % and 84.62 % respectively) were lower than those of DFAT. The concordance between RTCIT and DFAT was moderate, with a kappa quotient k = 0.341. The MIT values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 89.58 %, 100 % and 98.97 % respectively. The concordance between MIT and DFAT was substantial, with a k value of 0.720. DFAT, considered the "gold standard", was effective in all animals except horses. Our analyses evidenced that DFAT presents satisfactory results, although RTCIT did not appear favorable as a confirmatory technique.

Impact of adding an IgG4 conjugate to routine direct immunofluorescence testing for subepithelial and intraepithelial autoimmune blistering disorders.

BACKGROUND: Certain autoimmune bullous dermatoses are mediated by autoantibodies of the IgG4 subclass. We determined the diagnostic impact of adding IgG4 to our conventional direct immunofluorescence (DIF) panel. METHODS: For all cases submitted to our referral laboratory for DIF over 1 month (n = 630), we performed IgG4 testing and collected consecutive biopsy specimens showing definite or indeterminate linear or cell-surface deposition of IgG, IgG4, and/or C3. On retrospective blinded review, we classified the pattern and whether the findings were definite, indeterminate, or negative. When present, substantial background staining was recorded. RESULTS: Seventy DIF specimens met the inclusion criteria. Of 22 (31.4%) specimens equivocal for linear or cell-surface deposition, 9 (40.9%) had definitive IgG4 findings, either linear (3 of 14 equivocal linear cases; 21.4%) or cell-surface (6 of 8 equivocal cell-surface cases; 75.0%). Background deposition was substantial in 14 cases (20.0%) for IgG but in none for C3 or IgG4. CONCLUSION: IgG4 allowed the classification of over 40% of DIF cases that were otherwise equivocal by IgG and C3. IgG4 staining showed lower levels of non-specific background staining than IgG or C3. IgG4 appears to contribute most value in cases with cell-surface deposition or with equivocal linear IgG deposition and negative C3 results.

Clinical and histopathological spectrum of delayed adverse cutaneous reactions following COVID-19 vaccination.

BACKGROUND: As more people become vaccinated against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, reports of delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions are beginning to emerge. METHODS: In this IRB-approved retrospective case series, biopsy specimens of potential cutaneous adverse reactions from the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna mRNA vaccine were identified and reviewed. Clinical information was obtained through the requisition form, referring clinician, or medical chart review. RESULTS: Twelve cases were included. Histopathological features from two injection-site reactions showed a mixed-cell infiltrate with eosinophils and a spongiotic dermatitis with eosinophils. Three biopsy specimens came from generalized eruptions that showed interface changes consistent with an exanthematous drug reaction. Three biopsy specimens revealed a predominantly spongiotic pattern, consistent with eczematous dermatitis. Small-vessel vascular injury was seen in two specimens, which were diagnosed as urticarial vasculitis and leukocytoclastic vasculitis, respectively. There were two cases of new-onset bullous pemphigoid supported by histopathological examination and direct immunofluorescence studies. Eosinophils were seen in 10 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatopathologists should be aware of potential cutaneous adverse reactions to mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. Histopathological patterns include mixed-cell infiltrates, epidermal spongiosis, and interface changes. Eosinophils are a common finding but are not always present. Direct immunofluorescence studies may be helpful for immune-mediated cutaneous presentations such as vasculitis or bullous pemphigoid.

Assessment of Clinical and Laboratory Use of the Cutaneous Direct Immunofluorescence Assay.

IMPORTANCE: Dermatologists submit direct immunofluorescence (DIF) biopsies on a daily basis, using an assay detecting immunoreactant deposition with a panel that has traditionally comprised immunoglobulin (Ig) G, IgA, IgM, C3, and fibrin, with or without albumin antibodies. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the frequency of immunoreactants in DIF biopsies submitted over an 8-year period and assess use by dermatologists based on clinical impression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A quality improvement study was conducted in a community outreach reference laboratory associated with a large academic medical center. Results of 2050 consecutive DIF skin biopsies submitted to the laboratory between April 1, 2012, and June 12, 2020, were analyzed by final pathologic diagnosis and antibody subtype positivity, in comparison with clinical impression. Biopsies in which the submitting physician had not performed the biopsy were excluded. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Histopathologic findings and the results of DIF biopsies using the standard 6-antibody panel were evaluated in correlation with the submitted clinical diagnosis to assess immunoreactivity of the assay. RESULTS: Of 2050 DIF biopsies submitted, 367 (17.9%) were positive; IgG, IgA, and C3 alone identified all primary immunobullous disease cases (pemphigoid, pemphigus, linear IgA, and dermatitis herpetiformis), and IgA, C3, and fibrin antibodies alone identified all vasculitis cases. A panel of IgG, IgA, IgM, and fibrin identified all cases of lupus erythematosus. DIF results were positive in less than half of cases of hematoxylin and eosin biopsy-confirmed lupus erythematosus (23 of 47 [49%]). A total of 247 biopsies were submitted for clinical diagnoses not optimally supported on DIF: lichen planus, porphyria, and connective tissue disease. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this study suggest that there is a knowledge gap among dermatologists relating to the opportunity for high-value, cost-conscious use of DIF. The practice of reflexive antibody testing using a 6-antibody panel for all DIF biopsies is likely unnecessary. DIF protocols tailored to the clinical diagnosis may enhance cost-effectiveness without loss of test sensitivity or specificity.

Comparison of diagnostic performances of ten different immunoassays detecting anti-CCHFV IgM and IgG antibodies from acute to subsided phases of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever.

Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus (CCHFV) is a geographically widespread tick-borne arbovirus that has been recognized by the WHO as an emerging pathogen needing urgent attention to ensure preparedness for potential outbreaks. Therefore, availability of accurate diagnostic tools for identification of acute cases is necessary. A panel comprising 121 sequential serum samples collected during acute, convalescent and subsided phase of PCR-proven CCHFV infection from 16 Kosovar patients was used to assess sensitivity. Serum samples from 60 healthy Kosovar blood donors were used to assess specificity. All samples were tested with two IgM/IgG immunofluorescence assays (IFA) from BNITM, the CCHFV Mosaic 2 IgG and IgM indirect immunofluorescence tests (IIFT) from EUROIMMUN, two BlackBox ELISAs for the detection of CCHFV-specific IgM and IgG antibodies (BNITM), two Anti-CCHFV ELISAs IgM and IgG from EUROIMMUN using recombinant structural proteins of CCHFV antigens, and two ELISAs from Vector-Best (IgM: µ-capture ELISA, IgG: indirect ELISA using immobilized CCHFV antigen). Diagnostic performances were compared between methods using sensitivity, specificity, concordance and degree of agreement with particular focus on the phase of the infection. In early and convalescent phases of infection, the sensitivities for detecting specific IgG antibodies differed for the ELISA test. The BlackBox IgG ELISA yielded the highest, followed by the EUROIMMUN IgG ELISA and finally the VectorBest IgG ELISA with the lowest sensitivities. In the subsided phase, the VectorBest IgM ELISA detected a high rate of samples that were positive for anti-CCHFV IgM antibodies. Both test systems based on immunofluorescence showed an identical sensitivity for detection of anti-CCHFV IgM antibodies in acute and convalescent phases of infection. Available serological test systems detect anti-CCHFV IgM and IgG antibodies accurately, but their diagnostic performances vary with respect to the phase of the infection.

Paraneoplastic pemphigus: Revised diagnostic criteria based on literature analysis.

BACKGROUND: Paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP) is a rare autoimmune bullous disease classically associated with an underlying neoplasm. The heterogeneous clinical and histopathologic features of the disease make diagnosis challenging for clinicians. There are no formally accepted diagnostic criteria, and newer techniques for identifying antibodies directed against plakin proteins have largely replaced immunoprecipitation, the historic gold standard. METHODS: An analysis of 265 published cases of PNP was performed. The clinical, histopathologic, and immunologic features of PNP were assessed. RESULTS: Based on this review, we modified previous diagnostic criteria to capture 89.4% of PNP cases compared to 71.2% of cases captured by the most commonly referenced criteria devised by Camisa and Helm (p-value < 0.01, z-test; 95% CI [10.2, 33.6]). CONCLUSION: These revised diagnostic criteria address the variable clinical, histopathologic, and biochemical features of PNP, allowing physicians to have greater confidence in diagnosis of this rare and often fatal disease. The revised criteria include three major criteria and two minor criteria, whereby meeting either all three major criteria or two major and both minor criteria would fulfill a diagnosis of paraneoplastic pemphigus. The major criteria include (a) mucous membrane lesions with or without cutaneous involvement, (b) concomitant internal neoplasm, and (b) serologic evidence of anti-plakin antibodies. The minor criteria include (a) acantholysis and/or lichenoid interface dermatitis on histopathology and (b) direct immunofluorescence staining showing intercellular and/or basement membrane staining.

Fluorescence Colocalization Analysis of Cellular Distribution of MOR-1.

The interaction between neurons and glia is pivotal for the development of chronic opioid tolerance. One of the most important mechanisms of cell-to-cell interaction is the Notch signaling pathway. In this chapter we propose a double-immunofluorescence method to observe and quantify the colocalization of Notch-1 and mu-opioid receptor (MOR-1), using both neuronal and astrocyte markers.

Development and Evaluation of a Fully Automated Molecular Assay Targeting the Mitochondrial Small Subunit rRNA Gene for the Detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Specimens.

The fungal pathogen Pneumocystis jirovecii causes Pneumocystis pneumonia. Although the mitochondrial large subunit rRNA gene (mtLSU) is commonly used as a PCR target, a mitochondrial small subunit rRNA gene (mtSSU)-targeted MultiCode PCR assay was developed on the fully automated ARIES platform for detection of P. jirovecii in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens in 2.5 hours. The assay showed a limit of detection of 800 copies/mL (approximately equal to 22 organisms/mL), with no cross-reactivity with other respiratory pathogens. Compared with the reference Pneumocystis-specific direct fluorescent antibody assay (DFA) and mtLSU-targeted PCR assay, the new assay demonstrated sensitivity of 96.9% (31/32) and specificity of 94.6% (139/147) in detecting P. jirovecii in 180 clinical bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens. This assay was concordant with all DFA-positive samples and all but one mtLSU PCR-positive sample, and detected eight positive samples that were negative by DFA and mtLSU PCR. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.98 and a threshold cycle (CT) cutoff of 39.1 with sensitivity of 90.9% and specificity of 99.3%. The detection of 39.1

Development of biotinylated polyclonal anti-ribonucleoprotein IgG for detection of rabies virus antigen by direct rapid immunohistochemical test.

The direct rapid immunohistochemical test (dRIT) has been recommended for laboratorial diagnosis of rabies, especially in developing countries. The absence of commercial primary antibodies, however, still represents a major limitation to its wider use in testing. We describe here the development of a biotinylated polyclonal antibody against Rabies lyssavirus (RABV) ribonucleoprotein (RNP) and its use as a primary reagent in dRIT. Anti-RNP polyclonal horse IgG was purified by ionic exchange chromatography followed by immunoaffinity column chromatography, and its affinity, diagnostic sensitivity, and specificity were evaluated. CNS samples (120) of suspected rabies cases in different animal species were tested by dRIT, with the positive (n = 14) and negative (n = 106) results confirmed by direct fluorescence antibody testing (dFAT). Comparing the results of dRIT and dFAT, we found that the biotinylated anti-RNP IgG delivered 100% diagnostic specificity and sensibility for rabies diagnosis. Our findings show that the biotinylated anti-RNP polyclonal IgG can be produced with the quality required for application in dRIT. This work represents an important step in efforts to diagnose rabies in developing countries.

Validation of phospholipase A2 receptor direct immunofluorescence staining in the diagnosis of primary membranous glomerulonephritis.

Distinguishing between primary and secondary subtypes of membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) is critical for its clinical management. We prospectively compared direct immunofluorescence (DIF) staining for phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) on frozen renal biopsy with the presence of detectable serum PLA2R antibody assessed by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the diagnosis of primary MGN. Forty-six patients with biopsy-proven MGN were enrolled from April 2017 to June 2019 with 31/46 (67.4%) being primary and 15/46 (32.6%) being secondary as determined by comprehensive clinical assessment. This is currently deemed to be the gold standard for distinguishing primary from secondary MGN. Amongst the 31 primary MGN patients, 24/31 were positive on PLA2R DIF staining compared to 18/31 being positive on the PLA2R ELISA (p=0.03). Amongst the 15 secondary MGN patients, 1/15 was positive on PLA2R DIF compared to 0/15 on PLA2R ELISA (p=1.0). In conclusion, the presence of PLA2R staining on DIF demonstrated superior sensitivity and similar specificity compared to the detection of circulating PLA2R antibodies by ELISA in the diagnosis of primary MGN in a cohort of 46 patients with biopsy-proven MGN. We suggest that DIF should be considered as part of routine work-up in all newly diagnosed cases of MGN.

Comparison of five different laboratory techniques for the rabies diagnosis in clinically suspected cattle in Brazil.

The direct-fluorescent antibody test (dFAT) is considered the "gold standard" assay to diagnose rabies. However, it is crucial to develop molecular techniques, such as RT-PCR and RT-qPCR, since many laboratories lack the needed supplies for performing complementary methods (viral isolation, for example). For this purpose, diagnostic techniques must be specific and sensitive to guarantee accuracy. This present investigation aimed to detect rabies virus (RABV) in 126 clinically suspected cattle in Brazil using different diagnostic tests [dFAT, mouse inoculation test (MIT), immunohistochemistry (IHC), RT-PCR and RT-qPCR] and to compare those results obtained under routine laboratory conditions. The results of the present investigation demonstrate that the molecular techniques are more sensitive and may detect low viral load, even though the non-homogeneous viral distribution caused a false-negative result in dFAT. We also observed a usual alteration in antigens distribution among regions of the central nervous system (CNS). By both dFAT and IHC assays, the most reliable CNS structures were thalamus and midbrain. Although this investigation demonstrated diagnostic sensitivity and specificity close to 100 % in all laboratory techniques employed, a dFAT auxiliary test is required for bovine specimens, such as molecular techniques, when there are poor sampling conditions (low viral load combined with unavailability of brainstem structures).