Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Italy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Untreated spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is the leading genetic cause of death in children younger than 2 years of age. Early detection through newborn screening allows for presymptomatic diagnosis and treatment of SMA. With effective treatments available and reimbursed by the National Health Service, many regions in Italy are implementing newborn screening for SMA. We evaluated the cost effectiveness of universal newborn screening for SMA in Italy. METHODS: A decision-analytic model assessed the cost effectiveness of newborn screening from the National Health Service perspective in 400,000 newborns. Newborn screening enabling early identification and presymptomatic treatment of SMA was compared with no newborn screening, symptomatic diagnosis, and treatment. Transition probabilities between health states were estimated from clinical trial data. Higher-functioning health states were associated with increased survival, higher utility values, and lower costs. Long-term survival and utilities were extrapolated from scientific literature. Health care costs were collected from official Italian sources. A lifetime time horizon was applied, and costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Newborn screening followed by presymptomatic treatment yielded 324 incremental life-years, 390 incremental quality-adjusted life-years, and reduced costs by €1,513,375 over a lifetime time horizon compared with no newborn screening. Thus, newborn screening was less costly and more effective than no newborn screening. Newborn screening has a 100% probability of being cost effective, assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of > €40,000. CONCLUSIONS: Newborn screening followed by presymptomatic SMA treatment is cost effective from the Italian National Health Service perspective.

Cost-effectiveness of portable-automated ABR for universal neonatal hearing screening in India.

The World Health Organization considers Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS) essential to global public health. Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram has included newborn hearing screening in India since 2013. The program faces human, infrastructure, and equipment shortages. First-line hearing screening with improved diagnostic accuracy is needed. The Portable Automated Auditory Brainstem Responses (P-AABR) can be used in remote areas for UNHS due to its low infrastructure needs and diagnostic accuracy. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of P-AABR in UNHS. We employed an analytical model based on decision trees to assess the cost-effectiveness of Otoacoustic Emission (OAE) and P-AABR. The total cost to the health system for P-AABR, regardless of true positive cases, is INR 10,535,915, while OAE costs INR 7,256,198. P-AABR detects 262 cases, whereas OAE detects 26 cases. Portable Automated ABR costs INR 97 per case detection, while OAE costs INR 67. The final ICER was 97407.69. The P-AABR device is cost-effective, safe and feasible for UNHS Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK) programs. Beyond reducing false referrals and parent indirect costs, it detects more hearing-impaired infants. Even in shortages of skilled workers, existing staff can be trained. Thus, this study suggests integrating this device into community and primary health centers to expand UNHS coverage.

Direct healthcare costs in the first 2 years of life: A comparison of screened and clinically diagnosed children with cystic fibrosis - The Irish comparative outcomes study of CF (ICOS).

BACKGROUND: In July 2011, Cystic Fibrosis (CF) was added to the Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programme in Ireland. The Irish Comparative Outcomes Study (ICOS) is a historical cohort study established to compare outcomes between clinically-detected and screen-detected children with CF. Here we present the results of economic analysis comparing direct healthcare costs in the first 2 years of life of children born between mid-2008 and mid-2016, in the pre-CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulator era. METHODS: Healthcare resource use information was obtained from Cystic Fibrosis Registry of Ireland (CFRI), medical records and parental questionnaire. Hospital admissions, emergency department visits, outpatient appointments, antibiotics and maintenance medications were included. Costs were estimated using the Health Service Executive Casemix, Irish Medicines Formulary and hospital pharmacy data, adjusted for inflation using Consumer Price Index data from the Central Statistics Office. A Negative Binomial regression was used, with time in the study as an offset. RESULTS: Overall participation was 93 %. After exclusion of those with meconium ileus, data from 139 patients, with follow-up to 2 years of age, were available. 72 (51.8 %) were from the clinically diagnosed cohort. In the final model (n=105), clinically diagnosed children had 2.62-fold higher costs per annum (p<0.0001), when adjusted for confounders, including homozygous ΔF508 or G511D mutation, socio-demographic factors and time between diagnosis and first CFRI interaction. CONCLUSIONS: There are few studies evaluating economic aspects of newborn screening for CF using routine care data. These results imply that the benefits of newborn screening extend to direct healthcare costs borne by the State.

Benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes in health economic assessments: the VALENTIA systematic review and qualitative investigation.

Background: Health economic assessments are used to determine whether the resources needed to generate net benefit from an antenatal or newborn screening programme, driven by multiple benefits and harms, are justifiable. It is not known what benefits and harms have been adopted by economic evaluations assessing these programmes and whether they omit benefits and harms considered important to relevant stakeholders. Objectives: (1) To identify the benefits and harms adopted by health economic assessments in this area, and to assess how they have been measured and valued; (2) to identify attributes or relevance to stakeholders that ought to be considered in future economic assessments; and (3) to make recommendations about the benefits and harms that should be considered by these studies. Design: Mixed methods combining systematic review and qualitative work. Systematic review methods: We searched the published and grey literature from January 2000 to January 2021 using all major electronic databases. Economic evaluations of an antenatal or newborn screening programme in one or more Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries were considered eligible. Reporting quality was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist. We identified benefits and harms using an integrative descriptive analysis and constructed a thematic framework. Qualitative methods: We conducted a meta-ethnography of the existing literature on newborn screening experiences, a secondary analysis of existing individual interviews related to antenatal or newborn screening or living with screened-for conditions, and a thematic analysis of primary data collected with stakeholders about their experiences with screening. Results: The literature searches identified 52,244 articles and reports, and 336 unique studies were included. Thematic framework resulted in seven themes: (1) diagnosis of screened for condition, (2) life-years and health status adjustments, (3) treatment, (4) long-term costs, (5) overdiagnosis, (6) pregnancy loss and (7) spillover effects on family members. Diagnosis of screened-for condition (115, 47.5%), life-years and health status adjustments (90, 37.2%) and treatment (88, 36.4%) accounted for most of the benefits and harms evaluating antenatal screening. The same themes accounted for most of the benefits and harms included in studies assessing newborn screening. Long-term costs, overdiagnosis and spillover effects tended to be ignored. The wide-reaching family implications of screening were considered important to stakeholders. We observed good overlap between the thematic framework and the qualitative evidence. Limitations: Dual data extraction within the systematic literature review was not feasible due to the large number of studies included. It was difficult to recruit healthcare professionals in the stakeholder's interviews. Conclusions: There is no consistency in the selection of benefits and harms used in health economic assessments in this area, suggesting that additional methods guidance is needed. Our proposed thematic framework can be used to guide the development of future health economic assessments evaluating antenatal and newborn screening programmes. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020165236. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR127489) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 25. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Every year the NHS offers pregnant women screening tests to assess the chances of them or their unborn baby having or developing a health condition. It also offers screening tests for newborn babies to look for a range of health conditions. The implementation of screening programmes and the care for women and babies require many resources and funding for the NHS, so it is important that screening programmes represent good value for money. This means that the amount of money the NHS spends on a programme is justified by the amount of benefit that the programme gives. We wanted to see whether researchers consider all the important benefits and harms associated with screening of pregnant women and newborn babies when calculating value for money. To do this, we searched all studies available in developed countries to identify what benefits and harms they considered. We also considered the views of parents and healthcare professionals on the benefits and harms screening that creates for families and wider society. We found that the identification of benefits and harms of screening is complex because screening results affect a range of people (mother­baby, parents, extended family and wider society). Researchers calculating the value for money of screening programmes have, to date, concentrated on a narrow range of benefits and harms and ignored many factors that are important to people affected by screening results. From our discussions with parents and healthcare professionals, we found that wider impacts on families are an important consideration. Only one study we looked at considered wider impacts on families. Our work also found that parent's ability to recognise, absorb and apply new information to understand their child's screening results or condition is important. Healthcare professionals involve in screening should consider this when supporting families of children with a condition. We have created a list for researchers to identify the benefits and harms that are important to include in future studies. We have also identified different ways researchers can value these benefits and harms, so they are incorporated into their studies in a meaningful way.

Insurance Reimbursement for Special Foods and Phenylalanine Levels in Patients With PKU in China.

Importance: Recent changes in China's social medical insurance reimbursement policy have impacted the financial burden of patients with phenylketonuria (PKU) for special foods. However, whether this policy change is associated with their blood phenylalanine (PHE) concentration is unclear. Objective: To investigate the association between the reimbursement policy and blood PHE concentration in patients with PKU. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study measured the blood PHE concentrations of 167 patients with PKU across 4 newborn screening centers in China from January 2018 to December 2021. The reimbursement policy for special foods for patients with PKU at 2 centers was canceled in 2019 and restored from 2020 onwards. In contrast, the other 2 centers consistently implemented the policy. Data were analyzed from September 10 to December 6, 2023. Exposures: The implementation and cancelation of the reimbursement policy for special foods of patients with PKU. Main Outcomes and Measures: The blood PHE concentration was regularly measured from 2018 to 2021. A 1-sided Z test was used to compare the mean of the blood PHE concentration between different years. Results: Among 167 patients with PKU (mean [SD] age, 84.4 [48.3] months; 87 males [52.1%]), a total of 4285 measurements of their blood PHE concentration were collected from 2018 to 2021. For patients at the center that canceled the reimbursement policy in 2019, the mean (SD) of the blood PHE concentrations in 2019 was 5.95 (5.73) mg/dL, significantly higher than 4.84 (4.11) mg/dL in 2018 (P < .001), 5.06 (5.21) mg/dL in 2020 (P = .006), and 4.77 (4.04) mg/dL in 2021 (P < .001). Similarly, for patients at the other center that canceled the policy in 2019, the mean (SD) of the blood PHE concentrations in 2019 was 5.95 (3.43) mg/dL, significantly higher than 5.34 (3.45) mg/dL in 2018 (P = .03), 5.13 (3.15) mg/dL in 2020 (P = .003), and 5.39 (3.46) mg/dL in 2021 (P = .03). On the contrary, no significant difference was observed between any of the years for patients at the 2 centers that consistently implemented the policy. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with PKU from multiple centers, the implementation of the reimbursement policy for special foods was associated with controlling the blood PHE concentration. Special foods expenditure for patients with PKU should be included in the scope of long-term social medical insurance reimbursement.

Cost-effectiveness of newborn screening for sickle cell disease: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the cost-effectiveness of targeted/selective newborn screening compared with universal screening for sickle cell disease across various countries and settings. INTRODUCTION: The incidence of sickle cell disease is a widespread and potentially fatal hematologic disorder that affects thousands of newborns worldwide. The cost of newborn screening creates a burden on households and the economy. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies will be eligible for inclusion in the review if they focus on the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening for sickle cell disease, comparing targeted/selective screening with universal screening. METHODS: A preliminary search of MEDLINE (PubMed) was undertaken using MeSH terms, such as sickle cell disease, newborn , and economic evaluations . Two reviewers will screen the titles, abstracts, and full text independently against the inclusion criteria. Disagreements will be resolved by discussion or with a third reviewer. To assess methodological quality, the JBI checklist for economic evaluation will be used. Data will be extracted by 2 reviewers using a modified JBI data extraction form. The JBI dominance ranking matrix for economic evaluations will be used to summarize and compare the results. Cost-effectiveness will be measured on the basis of cost per test/case detected, quality-adjusted life years gained, or disability-adjusted life years averted. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment will be conducted to evaluate the certainty of economic evidence, such as use of resources and expenditures, and to incorporate the results into the decision-making process. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017057963.

Sequencing projects will screen 200,000 newborns for disease.

U.K. and New York City efforts face cost and ethical issues.

[Cost-effectiveness methods of newborn screening assessment.] / Métodos para la evaluación económica de programas de cribado neonatal.

Newborn screening programs are a fundamental tool for secondary prevention or pre-symptomatic detection of certain conditions. The implementation of a newborn screening program requires an evaluation of effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, feasibility and budget impact. Economic evaluation aims to contribute to the sustainability and solvency of health systems, especially when it comes to informing about financing health interventions with public funds. This funding must be justified on the basis of robust evidence of effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, and acceptability. One of the most important limitations when evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a newborn screening program for hereditary disorders or congenital errors of metabolism is the scarcity of scientific evidence that limits the robustness of the economic analysis. Given the low availability of data, the use of expert opinion as a data source is unavoidable to complete the information. However, two main problems make it difficult to synthesize data obtained from various sources: biases and heterogeneity. Moreover, the measurement of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in pediatric populations poses serious methodological challenges. In Spain, although there is some heterogeneity in the supply of newborn screening programs between regions, guidelines are being established based on the best available scientific evidence to achieve the homogenization of newborn screening policies and programs at national level.

Los programas de cribado neonatal son una herramienta fundamental para la prevención secundaria o detección presintomática de determinadas afecciones. La implantación de un programa de cribado neonatal requiere necesariamente de una evaluación de su efectividad, seguridad, coste-efectividad, factibilidad e impacto presupuestario. La evaluación económica pretende contribuir a la sostenibilidad y solvencia de los sistemas sanitarios, especialmente a la hora de informar sobre la posible financiación, con fondos públicos, de intervenciones sanitarias como el cribado poblacional. Esta financiación debe justificarse en base a pruebas robustas de efectividad, seguridad, coste-efectividad y aceptabilidad. Una de las limitaciones más importantes a la hora de evaluar el coste-efectividad de un programa de cribado neonatal de trastornos hereditarios o de errores congénitos del metabolismo es la escasez de evidencia científica que limita la solidez y robustez del análisis de evaluación económica. Dada la baja disponibilidad de datos, el uso de la opinión de expertos como fuente de datos es inevitable para completar la información necesaria. Sin embargo, dos problemas principales dificultan la síntesis de datos obtenidos de varias fuentes: sesgos y heterogeneidad. Por otro lado, la medición de los años de vida ajustados por calidad (AVAC) en poblaciones pediátricas plantea serios desafíos metodológicos en un análisis de evaluación económica. En España, aunque existe cierta heterogeneidad en la oferta de programas de cribado neonatal entre CC.AA., se están estableciendo directrices basadas en la mejor evidencia científica disponible para conseguir la homogeneización de políticas y programas de cribado neonatal a nivel nacional.

Estimated Cost-effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection in China Using a Markov Model.

Importance: Congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMVi) is one of the most common infections associated with childhood hearing loss. Prevention and mitigation of cCMVi-related hearing loss will require an increase in newborn screening, which is not yet available in China. Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening strategies for cCMVi from the perspective of the Chinese health care system. Design, Setting, and Participants: A decision tree for a simulated cohort population of 15 000 000 live births was developed to compare the costs and health effects of 3 mutually exclusive interventions: (1) no screening, (2) targeted screening using CMV polymerase chain reaction assay for newborns who fail a universal hearing screening, and (3) universal screening for CMV among all newborns. Markov diagrams were used to evaluate the lifetime horizon (76 years). Main Outcomes and Measures: Cost, hearing-related health outcomes, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated based on a direct medical costs perspective. Costs and ICERs were reported in 2018 US dollars. Results: Incidence of cCMVi among newborns was reported to be approximately 0.7% in China. Targeted screening was less costly but also less effective than universal screening, identifying 41% of cases needing antiviral treatment and preventing nearly half of less severe or profound hearing loss. To avoid 1 CMV-related severe or profound hearing loss, 13 and 16 newborns need to be treated by targeted and universal screening, respectively. The ICERs of targeted and universal screening vs no screening were $79 and $2087 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively, at the discounted rate of 3.5%. Both screening options were cost-effective for the Chinese health care system based on the willingness-to-pay threshold of 3 × gross domestic product per capita. The sensitivity analysis showed that the prevalence of cCMVi, as well as diagnosis and treatment costs, were key factors that may be associated with decision-making. Conclusions and Relevance: To achieve cost-effectiveness and best health outcomes, universal screening could be considered for the Chinese population. While the results are specific to China, the model may easily be adapted for other countries.

Cost-Effectiveness of Nusinersen and Universal Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of nusinersen with and without universal newborn screening for infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). STUDY DESIGN: A Markov model using data from clinical trials with US epidemiologic and cost data was developed. The primary interventions studied were nusinersen treatment in a screening setting, nusinersen treatment in a nonscreening setting, and standard care. Analysis was conducted from a societal perspective. RESULTS: Compared with no screening and no treatment, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for nusinersen with screening was $330 558 per event-free life year (LY) saved, whereas the ICER for nusinersen treatment without screening was $508 481 per event-free LY saved. For nusinersen with screening to be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50 000 per event-free LY saved, the price would need to be $23 361 per dose, less than one-fifth its current price of $125 000. Preliminary data from the NURTURE trial indicated an 85.7% improvement in expected LYs saved compared with our base results. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, nusinersen and screening was a preferred strategy 93% of the time at a $500 000 WTP threshold. CONCLUSION: Universal newborn screening for SMA provides improved economic value for payers and patients when nusinersen is available.

Accuracy of Bilistick (a Point-of-Care Device) to Detect Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia.

INTRODUCTION: Early diagnosis and appropriate management of neonatal jaundice is crucial in avoiding severe hyperbilirubinemia and brain injury. A low-cost, minimally invasive, point-of-care (PoC) tool for total bilirubin (TB) estimation which can be useful across all ranges of bilirubin values and all settings is the need of the hour. OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of Bilistick system, a PoC device, for measurement of TB in comparison with estimation by spectrophotometry. DESIGN/METHODS: In this cross-sectional clinical study, in infants who required TB estimation, blood samples in 25-µl sample transfer pipettes were collected at the same time from venous blood obtained for laboratory bilirubin estimation. The accuracy of Bilistick in estimating TB within ±2 mg/dl of bilirubin estimation by spectrophotometry was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Among the enrolled infants, 198 infants were eligible for study analysis with the mean gestation of 36 ± 2.3 weeks and the mean birth weight of 2368 ± 623 g. The median age at enrollment was 68.5 h (interquartile range: 48-92). Bilistick was accurate only in 54.5% infants in measuring TB within ±2 mg/dl difference of TB measured by spectrophotometry. There was a moderate degree of correlation between the two methods (r = 0.457; 95% CI: 0.339-0.561, p value < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 0.5 mg/dl (SD ± 4.4) with limits of agreement between -8.2 and +9.1 mg/dl. CONCLUSION: Bilistick as a PoC device is not accurate to estimate TB within the clinically acceptable difference (±2 mg/dl) of TB estimation by spectrophotometry and needs further improvement to make it more accurate.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Screening Extremely Low Birth Weight Children for Hepatoblastoma Using Serum Alpha-fetoprotein.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening children born at extremely low birth weight (ELBW) for hepatoblastoma using serial serum alpha-fetoprotein measurements. STUDY DESIGN: We created a decision tree to evaluate the cost effectiveness of screening children born at ELBW between 3 and 48 months of age compared with current standard of care (no screening). Our model used discounted lifetime costs and monetary benefits in 2018 US dollars, based on estimates in the published literature. The effects of uncertainty in model parameters were also assessed using univariate sensitivity analyses, in which we changed the values for one parameter at a time to assess the effect on the estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS: For the estimated 55 699 children born at ELBW in the US each year, this screening is associated with 77.7 additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at a cost of $8.7 million. This results in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of about $112 000/QALY, which is considered cost effective from a US societal perspective. For children diagnosed with hepatoblastoma, our model finds that the screening regimen is associated with a 10.1% increase in survival, a 4.18% increase in expected QALYs, and a $245 184 decrease in expected cost. CONCLUSIONS: Screening ELBW children for hepatoblastoma between 3 and 48 months of age dominates the alternative and is cost effective from a societal perspective.

Implementation of a neonatal hearing screening programme in three provinces in Albania.

OBJECTIVES: The EUSCREEN study compares the cost-effectiveness of paediatric hearing screening programmes and aims to develop a cost-effectiveness model for this purpose. Alongside and informed by the development of the model, neonatal hearing screening (NHS) is implemented in Albania. We report on the first year. METHODS: An implementation plan was made addressing objectives, target population, screening protocol, screener training, screening devices, care pathways and follow up. NHS started January 1st, 2018 in four maternity hospitals: two in Tirana, one in Pogradec and one in Kukës, representing both urban and rural areas. OAE-OAE-aABR was used to screen well infants in maternity hospitals, whereas aABR-aABR was used in neonatal intensive care units and in mountainous Kukës for all infants. Screeners' uptake and attitudes towards screening and quality of screening were assessed by distributing questionnaires and visiting the maternity hospitals. The result of screening, diagnostics, follow up and entry into early intervention were registered in a database and monitored. RESULTS: Screeners were keen to improve their skills in screening and considered NHS valuable for Albanian health care. The number of "fail" outcomes after the first screen was high initially but decreased to less than 10% after eight months. In 2018, 11,507 infants were born in the four participating maternity hospitals, 10,925 (94.9%) of whom were screened in the first step. For 486 infants the result of screening was not registered. For the first screen, ten parents declined, eight infants died and one infant was discharged before screening could be performed. In 1115 (10.2%) infants the test either could not be performed or the threshold was not reached; 361 (32,4%) of these did not attend the second screen. For the third screen 31 (34.4%) out of 90 did not attend. Reasons given were: parents declined (124), lived too far from screening location (95), their infant died (11), had other health issues (7), or was screened in private clinic (17), no reason given (138). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of NHS in Albania is feasible despite continuing challenges. Acceptance was high for the first screen. However, 32.4% of 1115 infants did not attend the second screen, after a "fail" outcome for the first test.

Clinical Impact and Cost Efficacy of Newborn Screening for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical impact of a congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) newborn screening program and incremental costs relative to benefits in screened vs unscreened infants. We hypothesized that screening would lead to clinical benefits and would be cost effective. STUDY DESIGN: This was an ambispective cohort study at British Columbia Children's Hospital, including infants diagnosed with CAH from 1988-2008 and 2010-2018. Data were collected retrospectively (unscreened cohort) and prospectively (screened cohort). Outcome measures included hospitalization, medical transport, and resuscitation requirements. The economic analysis was performed using a public payer perspective. RESULTS: Forty unscreened and 17 screened infants were diagnosed with CAH (47% vs 53% male). Median days to positive screen was 6 and age at diagnosis was 5 days (range, 0-30 days) and 6 days (range, 0-13 days) in unscreened and screened populations, respectively. In unscreened newborns, 55% required transport to a tertiary care hospital, 85% required hospitalization, and 35% required a fluid bolus compared with 29%, 29%, and 12% in screened infants, respectively. The cost of care was $33 770 per case in unscreened vs $17 726 in screened newborns. In the screened cohort, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $290 in the best case analysis and $4786 in the base case analysis, per hospital day avoided. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with unscreened newborns, those screened for CAH were less likely to require medical transport and had shorter hospital stays. Screening led to a decrease in hospitalization costs. Although screening did not result in cost savings, it was assessed to be cost effective considering the clinical benefits and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects in Ontario, Canada: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Previously conducted cost-effectiveness analyses of pulse oximetry screening (POS) for critical congenital heart defects (CCHDs) have shown it to be a cost-effective endeavour, but the geographical setting of Ontario in relation to its vast yet sparsely populated regions presents unique challenges. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of POS for CCHD in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing POS to no POS, was conducted from the Ontario healthcare payer perspective using a Markov model. The base case was defined as a well-appearing newborn at 24 h of age. Outcome measures, including quality-adjusted life months (QALMs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) [ΔCost/ΔQALMs], were calculated over a lifetime horizon. All outcomes were discounted at 1.5% per year. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using an a priori ICER threshold of CAD$4166.67 per QALM (equivalent to CAD$50,000 per quality-adjusted life year). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: Implementation of POS is expected to lead to timely diagnosis of 51 CCHD cases annually. The incremental cost of performing POS was estimated to be $27.27 per screened individual, with a gain of 0.02455 QALMs. This yielded an ICER of CAD$1110.79 per QALM, well below the pre-determined threshold. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis estimated a 92.3% chance of routine implementation of POS being cost-effective. CONCLUSION: Routine implementation of POS for CCHD in Ontario is expected to be cost-effective.

A model-based economic evaluation of four newborn screening strategies for cystic fibrosis in Flanders, Belgium.

Objectives: The most cost-effective newborn screening strategy for cystic fibrosis (CF) for Flanders, Belgium, is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of four existing newborn screening strategies for CF: IRT-DNA (immunoreactive trypsinogen, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutation analysis), IRT-PAP (pancreatitis-associated protein), IRT-PAP-DNA, and IRT-PAP-DNA-EGA (extended CFTR gene analysis).Methods: Using data from published literature, the cost-effectiveness of the screening strategies was calculated for a hypothetical cohort of 65,606 newborns in Flanders, Belgium. A healthcare payer perspective was used, and the direct medical costs associated with screening were taken into account. The robustness of the model outcomes was assessed in sensitivity analyses.Results: The IRT-PAP strategy was the most cost-effective strategy in terms of costs per CF case detected (€9314 per CF case detected). The IRT-DNA strategy was more costly (€13,966 per CF case detected), but with an expected sensitivity of 93.4% also the most effective strategy, and was expected to detect 2.2 more cases of CF than the IRT-PAP strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of IRT-DNA vs. IRT-PAP was €54,180/extra CF case detected. The IRT-PAP-DNA strategy and the IRT-PAP-DNA-EGA strategy were both strongly dominated by the IRT-PAP strategy.Conclusion: The IRT-PAP strategy was the most cost-effective strategy in terms of costs per CF case detected. However, the strategy did not fulfil the European Cystic Fibrosis Society guidelines for sensitivity and positive predictive value. Therefore, the more costly and more effective IRT-DNA strategy may be the most appropriate newborn screening strategy for Flanders.

Determining concordance and cost impact of otoacoustic emission and automated auditory brainstem response in newborn hearing screening in a tertiary hospital.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared otoacoustic emission (OAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) in terms of concordance and cost impact for newborn hearing screening (NBHS) in the Philippine setting. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study to assess concordance between OAE and AABR involving 253 infants. Each infant underwent OAE and AABR testing. Infants who passed both tests were not required to follow up for additional testing. Infants who failed in any test were scheduled for repeat screening and diagnostic ABR after 1 month. Concordance was computed using B-statistic. FOR COST ANALYSIS: 4 scenarios were compared to 1-step both tests scenario: (1) OAE alone, (2) AABR alone, (3) 2-step OAE, and (4) 2-step AABR in terms of number of infants with hearing loss (HL) detected, cost of diagnosis, and economic loss from lack of treatment. RESULTS: There was high concordance between OAE and AABR (B-statistic = 0.8). AABR had a higher refer rate (18.58%) than OAE (10.27%) but higher number of detected babies with HL. Cost analysis favored an AABR alone scenario while the 2-step OAE protocol fared poorly. CONCLUSION: A change from 2-step OAE to AABR alone is worth considering in our institution.

Health professionals' views of newborn pulse oximetry screening in a midwifery-led maternity setting. "It's a good thing to do, but fund it!"

OBJECTIVE: To understand from health professionals who care for newborns their views on the introduction of pulse oximetry screening for the detection of hypoxaemia in a midwifery-led maternity setting. Although oximetry screening for newborns is internationally accepted, national screening is not yet introduced in New Zealand. In this context, we drew on maternity carers' reflections during a feasibility study of oximetry screening to provide perspectives on barriers and enablers to universal screening. METHODS: Data were generated from nine focus groups during five months of 2018 in two north island regions of New Zealand. Participants' (n = 45) opinions about the use of oximetry screening in newborns were analysed thematically using an inductive approach. FINDINGS: Overall, participants stated pulse oximetry screening was easy to do, non-invasive, and worthwhile. Midwives were reassured by screening that provided evidence of either a healthy baby or a need for urgent review. From participants' reports, we identified three themes: (1) oximetry screening for newborns is reassuring, practical and worthwhile; (2) midwifery services workload expectations and under-resourcing will hinder universal screening, and (3) location of the baby at the time of screening could impede universal access. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Midwives viewed implementing a national pulse oximetry screening programme as sensible but problematic unless resourced and funded appropriately. Policymakers should view the concerns of midwives about human and physical resources as significant and account for the need to resource this screening programme appropriately as a priority before implementation.

The cost-effectiveness of neonatal versus prenatal screening for congenital toxoplasmosis.

BACKGROUND: Congenital Toxoplasmosis (CT) can have severe consequences. France, Austria, and Slovenia have prenatal screening programs whereas some other countries are considering universal screening to reduce congenital transmission and severity of infection in children. The efficiency of such programs is debated increasingly as seroprevalence among pregnant women and incidence of congenital toxoplasmosis show a steady decrease. In addition, uncertainty remains regarding the effectiveness of pre- and postnatal treatments. METHOD: To identify cost-effective strategies, prenatal and neonatal screenings were compared using a decision-analytic model based on French guidelines and current knowledge of long-term evolution of the disease in treated children. Epidemiological data were extracted from the scientific literature and clinical data from the French Lyon cohort. Strategies were compared at one year of age, when infection can be definitively evaluated, and at 15 years of age, after which validated outcome data become scarce. The analysis was performed from the French Health Insurance System perspective and included direct medical costs for pregnant women and their children. RESULTS: The 1-year Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio showed that prenatal screening would require investing €14,826 to avoid one adverse event (liveborn with CT, fetal loss, neonatal death or pregnancy termination) compared to neonatal screening. Extra investment increased up to €21,472 when considering the 15-year endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal screening is cost-effective as compared to neonatal screening in moderate prevalence areas with predominant Type II strains. In addition, prenatal screening, by providing closer follow-up of women at risk increases the number of occasions for education avoiding toxoplasmosis.