RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonists (α1-ARAs) are frequently used in treatment of Hypertension and symptomatic benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). Numerous studies have demonstrated the association between α1-ARAs like Tamsulosin and increased surgical risks for patients undergoing cataract surgery. This study aims to identify and study the effects of α1-ARAs on iris parameters and the subsequent operative challenges encountered during cataract surgery. METHODS: A cross-sectional, prospective study involving 30 patients on α1-ARAs planned for cataract surgery and equal number of age and sex matched controls were subjected to evaluation of changes on iris parameters and subsequent challenges in cataract surgery. RESULTS: The study group had statistically significant lesser pupil diameter. Iris thickness at sphincter muscle region (SMR) was similar between groups (P = 0.53). Significantly lower values of iris thickness at dilator muscle region (DMR) found in treated subjects (P = < 0.001). There was statistically significant difference between DMR/SMR ratio of two groups (P < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis revealed longer duration of α1-ARAs treatment correlated with reduced DMR/SMR ratio (P = 0.001; r = 0.47). CONCLUSION: α1-ARAs have implications for pupil size regulation and surgical procedures involving the eye. Tamsulosin is more potent than alfuzosin in inducing IFIS. Systemic α1-ARAs lower values of DMR thickness, DMR/SMR ratio and reduces pupillary diameter. Therefore, ophthalmologists, primary care physicians, urologists, and patients should be aware of the potential difficulties that these drugs pose for cataract surgery.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Extracción de Catarata , Iris , Tamsulosina , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Prospectivos , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/farmacología , Femenino , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Iris/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pupila/efectos de los fármacos , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects and safety of boldine combined with Phyllanthus niruri and Ononis spinosa plus tamsulosin vs. tamsulosin alone in medical expulsive therapy (MET) for distal ureteral calculi. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted on 159 renal colic patients with distal ureteric stones (≤10 mm). Patients aged between 18 and 70 years or older with distal ureteral (below the sacroiliac joint) stones ≤10 mm (defined by the largest diameter in three planes) confirmed by urinary ultrasonography and/or native computed tomography (CT). Patients were divided into two groups: A and B. Patients in Group A received tamsulosin 0.4 mg plus boldine combined with Phyllanthus niruri and Ononis spinosa, while those in Group B received tamsulosin 0.4 mg. The rate of stone expulsion, duration of stone expulsion, the dose and the duration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), analgesic use, and adverse effects of drugs were recorded. Results: No differences were reported in demographic profiles between the two groups. The stone expulsion rate in Group A (84.8%) was higher in comparison to Group B (52.5%); the mean time of stone expulsion was 16.33 ± 4.75 days in Group A and 19.33 ± 6.42 days in Group B. The mean requirement time of analgesia was significantly less in Group A, 2.42 ± 2.56, than in Group B, 6.25 ± 3.05. Drug-related adverse effects (headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, postural hypotension, backache, and running nose) were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: Tamsulosin plus boldine combined with Phyllanthus niruri and Ononis spinosa as medical expulsion therapy is more effective for distal ureteric stones with less need for analgesics and a shorter stone expulsion time than tamsulosin alone.
Asunto(s)
Phyllanthus , Cólico Renal , Tamsulosina , Cálculos Ureterales , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Cólico Renal/tratamiento farmacológico , Cálculos Ureterales/tratamiento farmacológico , Cálculos Ureterales/complicaciones , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Aporfinas/uso terapéutico , Aporfinas/farmacología , Resultado del Tratamiento , AdolescenteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Alpha-1-adrenergic receptor antagonists (AARAs) are used in the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy. Some AARAs, such as terazosin, stimulate glycolysis and increase cellular adenosine triphosphate levels through activation of phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1), which has been suggested to be of therapeutic benefit in patients with Parkinson disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether exposure to PGK1-activating AARAs was associated with slower PD progression. METHODS: National Veterans Affairs administrative data were used to identify patients who initiated PD-related pharmacotherapy during 2000 to 2019 and were concurrently prescribed an AARA. Using a retrospective cohort design, the count of incident PD-related outcome events within 1 year of follow-up was contrasted between patients prescribed a PGK1-activating AARA versus tamsulosin (an AARA without PKG1 stimulation), using multivariable negative binomial regression. PD-related outcome events were identified using ICD codes indicating motor symptoms, nonmotor symptoms, and other potential complications as clinical markers for the progression of PD. RESULTS: A total of 127,142 patients initiated drug therapy for PD during the observation period, of whom 24,539 concurrently received an AARA. Incident PD-related events were observed significantly less often in patients receiving a PGK1 AARA (n = 14,571) than tamsulosin (n = 9968) (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.80 [95% CI 0.77-0.83]). These results remained significant after adjustment for confounding factors (IRR 0.85 [95% CI 0.81-0.88]) and in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Patients prescribed a PGK1-activating AARA experienced fewer PD-related outcome events than patients prescribed tamsulosin. These results may indicate a role for terazosin and other PGK1 activators in slowing disease progression of PD; however, randomized controlled trials are needed.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Fosfoglicerato Quinasa , Tamsulosina , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Masculino , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/farmacología , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Prazosina/uso terapéutico , Prazosina/análogos & derivados , Prazosina/farmacología , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To study the effects of benign prostatic hyperplasia treatments, namely: alpha-adrenergic receptor blockers, 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors on the risk of Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All male Medicare enrollees aged 65 or above who were diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia and received one of the study drugs between 2007-2020 were followed-up for the three outcomes. We used Cox regression analysis to assess the relative risk of each of the outcomes for each study drug compared to the most prescribed drug, tamsulosin, while controlling for demographic, socioeconomic and comorbidity factors. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The study analyzed 1.1 million patients for a mean follow-up period of 3.1 years from being prescribed one of the study drugs. For all outcomes, patients on tamsulosin were used as the reference for comparison. For mortality, alfuzosin was associated with 27% risk reduction (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.68-0.78), and doxazosin with 6% risk reduction (HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.91-0.97). For Parkinson's disease, terazosin was associated with 26% risk reduction (HR 0.74, 95%CI 0.66-0.83), and doxazosin with 21% risk reduction (HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.72-0.88). For Alzheimer's disease, terazosin was associated with 27% risk reduction (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.65-0.82), and doxazosin with 16% risk reduction (HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.76-0.92). Tadalafil was associated with risk reduction (27-40%) in all 3 outcomes. More research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of these observations. Given the availability of safer alternatives for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia, caution should be exercised when using tamsulosin in elderly patients, especially those with an increased risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Medicare , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Hiperplasia Prostática , Tamsulosina , Humanos , Masculino , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Tamsulosina/efectos adversos , Anciano , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperplasia Prostática/mortalidad , Hiperplasia Prostática/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/mortalidad , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/mortalidad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de 5-alfa-Reductasa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de 5-alfa-Reductasa/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 5/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 5/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of administering tamsulosin before surgery on the successful insertion of a 12/14 French (F) ureteral access sheath (UAS) during the procedure, as well as the impact of preoperative and postoperative tamsulosin use on symptoms related to the ureteral stent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a randomized, single-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial involving 200 patients who underwent unilateral retrograde intrarenal surgery. Patients received either tamsulosin (0.4 mg) or placebo 1 week before surgery until stent removal. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Group 1 received tamsulosin throughout the study period. Group 2 received tamsulosin before surgery and placebo after surgery. Group 3 received placebo before surgery and tamsulosin after surgery. Group 4 received placebo before and after surgery. The USSQ (Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire) was completed between postoperative days 7 and 14 immediately before stent removal. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were included in this analysis. Their mean age was 55.0±11.0 years, and 48 patients (30.0%) were female. In the group that received preoperative tamsulosin, the success rate of 12/14F UAS deployment was significantly higher than that of the preoperative placebo group (88.0 vs. 75.3%, p=0.038). Preoperative and postoperative tamsulosin did not significantly alleviate symptoms related to the ureteral stent. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that preoperative administration of tamsulosin improved the success of larger-sized UAS, whereas preoperative and postoperative tamsulosin use did not significantly alleviate symptoms related to ureteral stents.
Asunto(s)
Stents , Tamsulosina , Uréter , Humanos , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Tamsulosina/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Uréter/cirugía , Anciano , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/administración & dosificaciónAsunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Hiperplasia Prostática , Tamsulosina , Humanos , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Tamsulosina/administración & dosificación , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Masculino , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Hiperplasia Prostática , Tamsulosina , Humanos , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Tamsulosina/administración & dosificación , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Masculino , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) result in abnormal retinal anatomical alteration. OBJECTIVE: To compare age-related macular degeneration (AMD) incidence in BPH patients receiving 5ARIs or tamsulosin. DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based cohort study using new-user and active-comparator design. SETTING: General population. SUBJECTS: Males with BPH, newly receiving 5ARIs or tamsulosin from 2010 to 2018. METHODS: Data were extracted from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. We used Cox proportional hazards model with 1:4 propensity score (PS) matching, based on intention-to-treat analysis to determine the risk of incident AMD. Sensitivity analyses included an as-treated approach and weighting-based PS methods. We also separately reported the risks of incident AMD in patients receiving finasteride and dutasteride to determine risk differences among different 5ARIs. RESULTS: We included 13 586 5ARIs users (mean age: 69 years) and 54 344 tamsulosin users (mean age: 68.37 years). After a mean follow-up of 3.7 years, no differences were observed in the risk of incident AMD between 5ARIs and tamsulosin users [hazard ratio (HR): 1.06; 95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 0.98-1.15], with similar results from sensitivity analyses. However, increased risk of incident age-related macular degeneration was observed in patients receiving dutasteride [HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.02-1.25], but not in those receiving finasteride [HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.87-1.12], in the subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference between 5ARIs and tamsulosin regarding the incidence of AMD in BPH patients. However, the risk profiles for AMD differed slightly between dutasteride and finasteride, suggesting that the potency of androgen inhibition is a factor related to AMD incidence.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de 5-alfa-Reductasa , Dutasterida , Finasterida , Degeneración Macular , Hiperplasia Prostática , Tamsulosina , Humanos , Inhibidores de 5-alfa-Reductasa/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de 5-alfa-Reductasa/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Anciano , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperplasia Prostática/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taiwán/epidemiología , Incidencia , Degeneración Macular/epidemiología , Degeneración Macular/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular/inducido químicamente , Dutasterida/uso terapéutico , Dutasterida/efectos adversos , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Tamsulosina/efectos adversos , Finasterida/efectos adversos , Finasterida/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Bases de Datos FactualesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The study aimed to determine the typical clearance and volume of distribution values of tamsulosin in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and to identify factors with a measurable impact on the drug's elimination. METHODS: This open-label, single-arm population pharmacokinetic study involved 65 adult men with BPH who had been on tamsulosin therapy for at least seven days. The steady-state serum concentrations of tamsulosin were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry. Population pharmacokinetic parameters, their variability, and influencing factors were estimated based on a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model using NONMEM software. RESULTS: The estimated tamsulosin clearance in BPH patients was 0.719 L/h, and the steady-state volume of distribution was 32 L. Neither renal nor liver function parameters had a statistically significant effect on tamsulosin clearance. However, a positive correlation was observed between hemoglobin levels and tamsulosin clearance in the BPH patient cohort. CONCLUSION: Our investigation reveals significant associations between tamsulosin pharmacokinetics and specific characteristics of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to BPH. The study highlights that tamsulosin clearance is associated with hemoglobin levels in patients with LUTS/BPH. This study underscores the importance of considering patient-specific factors when managing BPH treatment with tamsulosin, emphasizing associations rather than causative relationships.
Asunto(s)
Hiperplasia Prostática , Tamsulosina , Humanos , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Tamsulosina/farmacocinética , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/farmacocinética , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/tratamiento farmacológico , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The isometric handgrip (IHG) test is commonly used to detect sympathetic autonomic dysfunction. Tamsulosin, approved for the management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), acts as an antagonist for α1-adrenergic receptors (α1-AR), whereas prazosin, an α1 receptor blocker, being less selective than tamsulosin, is used as an antihypertensive agent clinically. Our objective was to investigate if there is a distinction in blood pressure (BP) increase during IHG exercise between individuals with essential hypertension taking tamsulosin compared to those taking prazosin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was performed on 50 subjects receiving tablet prazosin and 47 subjects receiving tamsulosin, who were asked to undergo an IHG test. Pre- and posttest BP was recorded for both the groups, and the difference in diastolic BP (DBP) (delta DBP) was compared between the groups and to their respective baseline values. RESULTS: Post-IHG test, mean DBP was found to be 93.98 ± 9.13 mm Hg in the prazosin group and 101.00 ± 12.05 mm Hg in the tamsulosin group, respectively. The change of delta DBP in the tamsulosin group was significant, but the prazosin group showed an insignificant rise in DBP. CONCLUSION: Prazosin, being less selective than tamsulosin in terms of α1 receptor antagonism, showed suppression of BP during IHG. Tamsulosin demonstrates high selectivity for prostatic receptors while showing minimal affinity for vascular receptors. As a result, its impact on BP is expected to be minimal.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Presión Sanguínea , Fuerza de la Mano , Hipertensión , Prazosina , Hiperplasia Prostática , Tamsulosina , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperplasia Prostática/fisiopatología , Prazosina/farmacología , Prazosina/uso terapéutico , Prazosina/administración & dosificación , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/farmacología , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Fuerza de la Mano/fisiología , Anciano , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , IndiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Terazosin, doxazosin, and alfuzosin (Tz/Dz/Az) are α-1 adrenergic receptor antagonists that also bind to and activate a key adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-producing enzyme in glycolysis. It is hypothesized that the increase in energy availability in the brain may slow or prevent neurodegeneration, potentially by reducing the accumulation of alpha-synuclein. Recent work has suggested a potentially neuroprotective effect of the use of Tz/Dz/Az in Parkinson disease in both animal and human studies. We investigated the neuroprotective effects of Tz/Dz/Az in a closely related disease, dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). METHODS: We used a new-user active comparator design in the Merative Marketscan database to identify men with no history of DLB who were newly started on Tz/Dz/Az or 2 comparator medications. Our comparator medications were other drugs commonly used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia that do not increase ATP: the α-1 adrenergic receptor antagonist tamsulosin or 5α-reductase inhibitor (5ARI). We matched the cohorts on propensity scores and duration of follow-up. We followed up the matched cohorts forward to estimate the hazard of developing DLB using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Men who were newly started on Tz/Dz/Az had a lower hazard of developing DLB than matched men taking tamsulosin (n = 242,716, 728,256 person-years, hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.50-0.71) or 5ARI (n = 130,872, 399,316 person-years, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.93). while the hazard in men taking tamsulosin was similar to that of men taking 5ARI (n = 159,596, 482,280 person-years, HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96-1.42). These results were robust to several sensitivity analyses. DISCUSSION: We find an association in men who are taking Tz/Dz/Az and a lower hazard of DLB compared with similar men taking other medications. When combined with the literature of Tz/Dz/Az on Parkinson disease, our findings suggest that glycolysis-enhancing drugs may be broadly protective in neurodegenerative synucleinopathies. A future randomized trial is required to assess these associations for causality. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that Tz/Dz/Az use reduces the rate of developing DLB in adult men.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Doxazosina , Enfermedad por Cuerpos de Lewy , Prazosina , Quinazolinas , Humanos , Masculino , Doxazosina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Prazosina/análogos & derivados , Prazosina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad por Cuerpos de Lewy/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Quinazolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinazolinas/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/farmacología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
AIM: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of administering double-dose tamsulosin (0.8 mg) for treating patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who have not responded to the standard single dose of tamsulosin (0.4 mg) and are deemed unsuitable for transurethral resection (TUR) intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2022 and July 2023, we prospectively analyzed 111 patients who were experiencing severe BPH symptoms. These patients received a double dose of tamsulosin for one month. We collected baseline characteristics such as age, body mass index, and underlying medical conditions. Various parameters including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), voided volume, and post-void residual volume were evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: All 111 patients completed the study. The mean age, PSA level, and prostate volume were 63.12 ± 4.83 years, 3.42 ± 0.93 ng/ml, and 50.37 ± 19.23 ml, respectively. Of these patients, 93 showed improvement in Qmax, post-void residual volume, and IPSS score (p-value = 0.001). The total IPSS score and total Qmax improved from 24.03 ± 2.49 and 7.72 ± 1.64 ml/sec to 16.41 ± 3.84 and 12.08 ± 2.37 ml/sec, respectively. CONCLUSION: Double-dose 0.8mg tamsulosin as an alpha-blocker therapy appears to be a viable temporary management option for BPH patients who have not responded to the standard single dose 0.4mg tamsulosin and are not suitable candidates for TUR intervention.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Hiperplasia Prostática , Tamsulosina , Humanos , Tamsulosina/administración & dosificación , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Esquema de MedicaciónRESUMEN
The purpose of this study is to better characterize patient- and surgery-specific parameters associated with postoperative urinary retention (POUR) and assess the impact of prophylactic Tamsulosin following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for the management of scoliosis in pediatric and adolescent patients. All patients who underwent PSF for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified based on whether they received prophylactic Tamsulosin. Overall, POUR was reported in 3.7% (n = 10) of all patients in the study, although Tamsulosin was associated with a lower rate of POUR, and this did not reach statistical significance. Longer fusion constructs were identified as a risk factor for POUR and could help surgeons counsel families prior to surgery. This is the first study to assess the rate of POUR on AIS and NMS patients following PSF without epidural analgesia. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(1):010-013, 2024).
Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Escoliosis , Fusión Vertebral , Tamsulosina , Retención Urinaria , Humanos , Retención Urinaria/prevención & control , Retención Urinaria/epidemiología , Escoliosis/cirugía , Adolescente , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Incidencia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Niño , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Despite the availability of various drugs for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), alpha(α)-blockers are the preferred first-line treatment. However, there remains a scarcity of direct comparisons among various α-blockers. Therefore, this network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of α-blockers in the management of BPH. A comprehensive electronic search covered PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library until August 2023. The primary endpoints comprised international prostate symptom score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax), quality of life (QoL), and post-void residual volume (PVR), while treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were considered as secondary endpoints. This NMA synthesized evidence from 22 studies covering 3371 patients with six kinds of α-blockers with 12 dose categories. IPSS has been considerably improved by tamsulosin 0.4 mg, naftopidil 50 mg and silodosin 8 mg as compared to the placebo. Based on the p-score, tamsulosin 0.4 mg had the highest probability of ranking for IPSS, PVR, and Qmax, whereas doxazosin 8 mg had the highest probability of improving QoL. A total of 297 adverse events were reported among all the α-blockers, silodosin has reported a notable number of TEAEs. Current evidence supports α-blockers are effective in IPSS reduction and are considered safer. Larger sample size with long-term studies are needed to refine estimates of IPSS, QoL, PVR, and Qmax outcomes in α-blocker users.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa , Metaanálisis en Red , Hiperplasia Prostática , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tamsulosina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Although it is known that alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonists have positive effects on metabolic parameters such as glucose metabolism, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity, it is unclear whether this is a class effect. Tamsulosin is reported to have adverse effects on glucose metabolism and insulin resistance, and this may be because of its lack of glycolysis-enhancing effect compared with other alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonists with glycolysis-enhancing effects such as doxazosin, terazosin, and alfuzosin. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of tamsulosin on metabolic parameters with another alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonist, doxazosin. METHODS: In this prospective, observational, controlled, 12-week clinical study, a total of 60 male patients aged ≥ 40 years who were first started on tamsulosin (n = 30; 0.4 mg/day, oral; mean age, 59.20 ± 8.97 years) or doxazosin (n = 30; 4 or 8 mg/day, oral; mean age, 58.50 ± 8.93 years) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were enrolled. The groups were compared according to the changes in anthropometric and biochemical parameters (glycemia, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity) at the end of treatment. RESULTS: In intragroup analyses, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and HbA1c levels decreased significantly in the doxazosin group compared with baseline (p < 0.05 for all), while no significant change was observed in the tamsulosin group. In comparisons between groups, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels showed a significant decrease in the doxazosin group compared with the tamsulosin group (percent change: - 6.68 ± 13.08 vs. 0.53 ± 11.02, p = 0.025; - 3.63 ± 9.56 vs. 4.02 ± 10.86, p = 0.005; and - 5.62 ± 18.18 vs. 5.24 ± 15.42, p = 0.015, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although these results do not support previous findings that tamsulosin has adverse effects on metabolic parameters, they suggest that doxazosin treatment may be a reason for preference in patients with BPH or LUTS accompanied by metabolic disorder.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Doxazosina , Hiperplasia Prostática , Tamsulosina , Humanos , Masculino , Doxazosina/uso terapéutico , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucemia/metabolismo , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Resistencia a la Insulina , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of semirigid ureteroscopy and tamsulosin therapy as dilatation methods before flexible ureteroscopy advancement to the renal collecting system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study included patients with renal stones less than 2 cm who underwent retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy. The patients were randomized into two groups: group A patients were given a placebo for 1 week before flexible ureteroscopy, and group B patients were administered 0.4 mg of tamsulosin once daily for 1 week before surgery and underwent active dilatation using semirigid ureteroscopy before flexible ureteroscopy. The ability of the flexible ureteroscope to reach the collecting system in both groups during the same operative session was assessed. Operative outcomes and complications were collected and analyzed in both groups. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were included in our study, with each group comprising 85 patients. In group B, the flexible ureteroscope successfully accessed the kidney in 61 patients, while in group A, the flexible ureteroscope was successful only in 28 cases (71.4% versus 32.9%). In group A, 33 (38.8%) patients had lower urinary tract symptoms compared to 17 (20.2%) patients in group B (P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Using tamsulosin therapy and semirigid ureteroscopy as dilatation methods before flexible ureteroscopy increased the success of primary flexible ureteroscopy advancement to renal collecting system.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Ureteroscopía , Humanos , Ureteroscopios , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Dilatación , Estudios Prospectivos , Cálculos Renales/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the urological and sexual outcomes of using either tamsulosin/finateride or tadalafil/finasteride as combination therapies in patients with large prostate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Selection criteria included prostate volume > 40 ml and IPSS > 7. Patients with severe erectile dysfunction (IIEF-erectile functions ≤ 10) were excluded. Patients were randomized into group I (tamsulosin/finasteride) and group II (tadalafil/finasteride). The primary endpoint was to define urinary and sexual function changes (IPSS, IPSS-quality of life, urinary flow rates and IIEF domains) within each group. The secondary endpoint was to compare the treatment induced changes between both groups. RESULTS: At 4th and 12th weeks, 131 and 127 patients were available in both groups, respectively. Both groups showed significant LUTS improvement (IPSS changes: - 4.9 ± 2.7 and - 4.3 ± 2.9 at 4th week and - 6.1 ± 3 and - 5.4 ± 2.8 points by the 12th week in both groups, respectively). Group I had better average flow rates at both follow-up visits. Meanwhile, maximum flow rates were comparable in both groups at 12th week (13.5 ± 3.9vs. 12.6 ± 3.7, p > 0.05). In group I, all IIEF domains were significantly lowered at both visits (p < 0.05). Group II showed significant increase in IIEF-erectile function scores (1.3 ± 1.1 and 1.8 ± 1.2 at the 4th and 12th weeks) with a transient significant reduction of IIEF-orgasm and sexual desire noted only by the 4th week (- 0.8 ± 0.4 and - 0.6 ± 0.4, respectively). CONCLUSION: Within three months, both combinations are comparably effective in improving BPH related LUTS. Tamsulosin/finasteride provided significantly better Qmax only at 4th week. Tadalafil/finasteride had the advantage of improving sexual performance over the other combination.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior , Hiperplasia Prostática , Humanos , Masculino , Inhibidores de 5-alfa-Reductasa/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Disfunción Eréctil/prevención & control , Finasterida/uso terapéutico , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/prevención & control , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Tadalafilo/uso terapéutico , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and the safety of Tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day and 0.8 mg/day in patients suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective interventional, double-blinded, controlled study was carried out on 93 patients who met the criteria and divided randomly into two groups: group A for Tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day and group B for Tamsulosin 0.8 mg/day. International prostate symptom score, post void residual urine volume, and maximum flow rate of urine were assessed before and after 4 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Both study groups showed a significant reduction in storage sub-score but only frequency was significantly reduced in group B (P < 0.001). On the other hand, Tamsulosin 0.8 mg was superior to Tamsulosin 0.4 mg regarding voiding sub-score except for straining (P = 0.325). Accordingly, the total international prostate symptom score was significantly improved in group B versus group A (P < 0.001). Furthermore, maximum flow rate and post-void residual urine volume were notably improved in Group B as compared to Group A (P < 0.001). Of all adverse events only dizziness was noted to be statistically significant in Group B versus Group A (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Tamsulosin 0.8 mg has shown better outcomes in treating patients who suffer from lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement than Tamsulosin 0.4 mg, and besides that, it is well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: M S 292/2020, SID: 373, date: 22/4/2020.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior , Hiperplasia Prostática , Tamsulosina , Humanos , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Tamsulosina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/tratamiento farmacológico , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Doble Ciego , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Overactive bladder symptoms (OABSs) affect patients' quality of life (QOL) worldwide. This pooled analysis compared the efficacy and safety of mirabegron add-on tamsulosin with those of tamsulosin add-on placebo in OABS treatment. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy of mirabegron add-on therapy to tamsulosin in the treatment of OABS. Moreover, references from the selected studies were screened. Review Manager 5.4 was used to analyze data. RESULTS: Four RCTs involving 1,397 patients with OABS were selected. Of the total, 697 patients receiving mirabegron add-on tamsulosin constituted the experimental group, and 700 patients receiving tamsulosin add-on placebo constituted the control group. The efficacy endpoints were as follows: mean number of micturition per day (mean difference [MD] = -0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.41 to -0.10, p = 0.0001), urgency episodes per day (MD = -0.67, 95% CI = -1.02 to -0.32, p = 0.0002), urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes per day (MD = -0.42, 95% CI = -0.66 to -0.19, p = 0.0005), mean volume voided/micturition (MD = 10.84, 95% CI = 4.97-16.71, p = 0.0003), total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (MD = -2.01, 95% CI = -4.02 to -0.01, p = 0.05), and IPSS QOL index (MD = -0.65, 95% CI = -0.94 to -0.35, p < 0.0001). Mirabegron therapy, an add-on therapy to tamsulosin, was effective in treating patients with OABS. Moreover, mirabegron might reduce the total IPSS (MD = -2.01, 95% CI = -4.02 to -0.01, p = 0.05). The safety endpoint, treatment-emergent adverse events (odds ratio = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.78-1.13, p = 0.49), suggested that although mirabegron was well-tolerated, it possibly increased the post-void residual urine volume (MD = 10.28, 95% CI = 1.82-18.75, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Combination therapy using mirabegron and tamsulosin may be effective in treating patients with non-neurogenic OABS in terms of UUI episodes, total IPSS, and IPSS QOL index. However, its effectiveness must be verified by analyzing additional factors for OABS through further RCTs.
Asunto(s)
Acetanilidas , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tamsulosina , Tiazoles , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva , Humanos , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico , Tiazoles/uso terapéutico , Acetanilidas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Calidad de Vida , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapéutico , Agentes Urológicos/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 3/uso terapéutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 3/efectos adversos , AncianoRESUMEN
Chronic prostatitis, which frequently manifests with perineal or urethral ulcers, can have substantial impact on the quality of life experienced by affected individuals. Present treatment approaches primarily target the alleviation of symptoms and control of complications. In patients with chronic prostatitis, this investigation examined the potential synergistic effects of tamsulosin and levofloxacin on urinary function and urethral and perineal wounds healing. This cross-sectional observational study was carried out at Chongqing Western Hospital, China, from February to November 2023. The participants comprised 88 males aged 40-75 years who had been clinically diagnosed with chronic prostatitis and complications that accompany the wound healing process. The participants were equally distributed into two groups: one assigned to the treatment group, which received a daily combination of levofloxacin (500 mg) and tamsulosin (0.4 mg) and other to receive conventional care. The wound healing rate and improvement in urinary function were the primary outcomes evaluated monthly for 9 months. Patient satisfaction and symptom amelioration were secondary outcomes, in addition to the surveillance of adverse effects. In comparison to the control, treatment group exhibited significantly higher rate of wound closure (78.08% at 1 month and 79.38% at 9 months) and urinary function improvement (66.69% at 1 month and 67.95% at 9 months). In addition, the treatment group exhibited a greater degree of symptom amelioration; however, a rise in adverse effects was observed. In every domain, patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the treatment group. Thus the combination of tamsulosin and levofloxacin improved urinary function and wound repair in patients with chronic prostatitis, while also exhibiting tolerable profile of adverse effects.