Tricalcium phosphate-loaded injectable hydrogel as a promising osteogenic and bactericidal teicoplanin-delivery system for osteomyelitis treatment: An in vitro and in vivo investigation.

Osteomyelitis is an inflammation of bone tissue usually caused by pyogenic bacteria. The most recurrent clinical approach consists of bone debridement followed by parenteral administration of antibiotics. However, systemic antibiotic treatment has limitations regarding absorption rate and bioavailability over time. The main challenge of osteomyelitis treatment consists of coupling the persistent infection treatment with the regeneration of the bone debrided. In this work, we developed an injectable drug delivery system based on poloxamer 407 hydrogel containing undoped Mg, Zn-doped tricalcium phosphate (ß-TCP), and teicoplanin, a broad-spectrum antibiotic. We evaluated how the addition of teicoplanin and ß-TCP affected the micellization, gelation, particle size, and surface charge of the hydrogel. Later, we studied the hydrogel degradation and drug delivery kinetics. Finally, the bactericidal, biocompatibility, and osteogenic properties were evaluated through in vitro studies and confirmed by in vivo Wistar rat models. Teicoplanin was found to be encapsulated in the corona portions of the hydrogel micelles, yielding a bigger hydrodynamics radius. The encapsulated teicoplanin showed a sustained release over the evaluated period, enough to trigger antibacterial properties against Gram-positive bacteria. Besides, the formulations were biocompatible and showed bone healing ability and osteogenic properties. Finally, in vivo studies confirmed that the proposed locally injected formulations yielded osteomyelitis treatment with superior outcomes than parenteral administration while promoting bone regeneration. In conclusion, the presented formulations are promising drug delivery systems for osteomyelitis treatment and deserve further technological improvements.

Off-label use of dalbavancin in children: a case series.

INTRODUCTION: Dalbavancin is an antibiotic active against most Gram-positive bacteria approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Owing to its long half-life, it is being increasingly used for other indications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present a case series of children and adolescents treated with dalbavancin for osteoarticular, catheter-related and other non-ABSSSI infections. RESULTS: Dalbavancin was prescribed to 15 patients. Six (40%) were female and median age at prescription was 11.9 (IQR 1.3-18.0) years. Most of them (12/15) had significant comorbidities. Patients presented mainly with deep surgical site infections, osteoarticular infections and central-line-associated bloodstream infections. The most common isolate was Staphylococcus aureus followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Major reasons to prescribe dalbavancin were to ensure compliance and patients' convenience. Two patients discontinued the drug due to adverse events possibly related to it. The rest of the patients completed the treatment with dalbavancin, with a median duration of 56 days (IQR 17.5, 115.5). All achieved complete resolution and present no relapse after a median follow-up of 9.9 months (IQR 4.8, 16.6). CONCLUSIONS: Dalbavancin was a safe, effective and convenient alternative in selected paediatric patients with complicated non-ABSSSI infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria.

Necessity for higher teicoplanin doses in older adults: a multicenter prospective observational study in China.

BACKGROUND: Many older adult patients receive low-dose teicoplanin with varied regimens, leading to a lack of clarity on its optimal regimens and toxicity profiles in China. This study aimed to clarify these aspects by analyzing teicoplanin treatment concentrations and toxicities. METHODS: We included older adult patients administered teicoplanin at four tertiary hospitals in Beijing from June 2021 to July 2023, targeting a trough concentration (Cmin) ≥ 10 mg/L. Teicoplanin concentrations and toxicities were monitored dynamically. RESULTS: From 204 patients, we obtained 632 teicoplanin concentrations. Most patients (83.3%) received low-dose regimens. Suboptimal concentrations were found in 66.4% of patients within 7 days of treatment and 17.0% after 15 days. Cmin gradually increased with treatment duration and was influenced initially by creatinine and by both body weight and creatinine from days 8 to 14. The target concentration was achieved in 53.1%, 33.9%, 15.6%, and 5.5% of patients at 3, ≤ 7, 8-14, and ≥ 15 days after withdrawal, respectively. Slow elimination was associated with average Cmin and eGFR. Nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 12.5%, 4.1%, and 31.5% of patients, respectively, without significant differences between concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Most older adult patients were underdosed, indicating a need for dose adjustment. Given the varied risk factors for suboptimal concentrations in different treatment stages, a one-size-fits-all regimen was ineffective. We recommend an initial dose of 400 mg at 12-h intervals for the first three days, with subsequent doses from days 4 to 14 adjusted based on creatinine and body weight; after day 14, a maintenance dose of 200 mg daily is advised. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2100046811; 28/05/2021.

Single Intravenous Dose Dalbavancin Pathway for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Considerations for Emergency Department Implementation and Cost Savings.

BACKGROUND: A pathway for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) with a single intravenous (IV) dose of dalbavancin was previously shown to reduce hospital admissions and shorten inpatient length of stay (LOS). OBJECTIVES: To describe pathway implementation at the emergency department (ED) and evaluate cost-effectiveness of a single-dose dalbavancin administered to ED patients who would otherwise be hospitalized to receive usual care with multidose IV antibiotics. METHODS: The dalbavancin pathway was previously implemented at 11 U.S. EDs (doi:10.1111/acem.14258). Patients with ABSSSI, without an unstable comorbidity or infection complication requiring complex management, were treated with a single dose of dalbavancin. At the emergency physicians' discretion, patients were either discharged and received outpatient follow-up or were hospitalized for continued management. A decision analytic cost-effectiveness model was developed from the U.S. healthcare's perspective to evaluate costs associated with the dalbavancin pathway compared with inpatient usual care. Costs (2021 USD) were modeled over a 14-day horizon and included ED visits, drug costs, inpatient stay, and physician visits. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses examined input parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: Driven largely by the per diem inpatient cost and LOS for usual care, the dalbavancin pathway was associated with savings of $5133.20 per patient and $1211.57 per hospitalization day avoided, compared with inpatient usual care. The results remained robust in sensitivity and scenario analyses. CONCLUSION: The new single-dose dalbavancin ED pathway for ABSSSI treatment, which was previously implemented at 11 U.S. EDs, offers robust cost savings compared to inpatient usual care.

Real-life experience with IV dalbavancin in Canada; results from the CLEAR (Canadian LEadership on Antimicrobial Real-life usage) registry.

OBJECTIVES: We report the use of IV dalbavancin in Canadian patients using data captured by the national CLEAR registry. METHODS: The CLEAR registry uses the web-based data management program, REDCap™ (online survey https://rcsurvey.radyfhs.umanitoba.ca/surveys/?s=TPMWJX98HL) to facilitate clinicians entering details associated with their clinical experiences using IV dalbavancin. RESULTS: Data were available for 40 patients. The most common infections treated were acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) (62.5% of patients), bone/joint infection (22.5%), bloodstream/vascular infection (7.5%) and endocarditis (5.0%). Dalbavancin was used as directed (75.0%) and empiric therapy (25.0%). MRSA was the most common identified pathogen (70.0%). Dalbavancin was used both in outpatient (e.g., emergency department) (65.0%), and inpatient treatment settings (e.g., hospital ward) (35.0%). Dalbavancin was used due to the convenience of a single dose treatment (77.5%) as well as to facilitate hospital discharge (7.5%). Dalbavancin was primarily used alone (90.0%), and most commonly using a single 1500 mg dose (77.5%). Microbiological success (pathogen eradicated or presumed eradicated) occurred in 88.2% of known cases, while clinical success (cure and/or improvement) occurred in 93.3% of known cases. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In Canada, IV dalbavancin is used as both directed and empiric therapy to treat ABSSSI as well as off-label (bone/joint, bacteremia/vascular, endocarditis, device-related) infections. It is used in both outpatient and inpatient settings due primarily to its convenience as a single-dose treatment regimen and to facilitate early hospital discharge. Dalbavancin use is associated with high microbiological and clinical cure rates along with an excellent safety profile.

Early Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Optimizes Teicoplanin Use in Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Hematological Malignancies.

INTRODUCTION: A target trough concentration (Cmin) of teicoplanin ≥ 15-20 mg/L between the fourth and sixth day has been suggested for severe infections or management of febrile neutropenia (FN). Owing to no reports discussing the impact of early target attainment on treatment outcomes, this study aimed to evaluate the dose-Cmin relationship and clinical outcome and estimate the optimal early target Cmin for FN in patients with hematological malignancies. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study enrolled patients with hematological malignancies who were treated with teicoplanin either as an empirical antibiotic for FN or as targeted treatment for Gram-positive bacteria. Blood samples were collected on day three (48 h) post-loading doses, day 5 (96 h), and day 8 (when applicable) and determined by ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography-triple quadruple mass spectrometry. A total of 117 samples from 47 patients with FN (27 men, 20 women) were consecutively analyzed. A two-tailed α value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean Cmin values at 48 h, 96 h, and on day 8 were 23.4, 21.4, and 27.8 mg/L, respectively. The patients achieving Cmin ≥ 20 mg/L at 48 h had a higher likelihood of treatment success. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.71 for clinical efficacy and the cutoff value of Cmin at 48 h was 18.85 mg/L (95% confidence interval 0.55-0.87; P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The Cmin of teicoplanin after completion of loading doses could predict the treatment response, with a target concentration ≥ 18.85 mg/L.

Dalbavancin as suppressive therapy for implant-related infections: a case series with therapeutic drug monitoring and review of the literature.

Implant-related infections may need suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT). We describe a SAT strategy using dalbavancin with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This is a retrospective bicentric study of patients with implant-related infection who received dalbavancin SAT between January 2021 and September 2023. Fifteen patients were included. Median number of injections was 4 (IQR: 2-7). Median time between two reinjections was 57 days (IQR 28-82). Dalbavancin plasma concentrations were above 4 mg/L for 97.9% of dosages (93/95) and above 8 mg/L for 85% (81/95). These results support the use of dalbavancin SAT for implant-related infections.

Risk Factors for Teicoplanin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: Focusing on Concomitant Use of Tazobactam/Piperacillin.

Patients with hematological malignancies (HM) often receive tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) and glycopeptide antibiotics for febrile neutropenia. The effect of concomitant use of TAZ/PIPC on risk of teicoplanin (TEIC)-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) remains unclear. We investigated the impact of concomitant TAZ/PIPC use on TEIC-associated AKI in HM patients and identified the risk factors. In this retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study, 203 patients received TEIC, 176 of whom satisfied the selection criteria and were divided into TEIC cohort (no TAZ/PIPC; n = 118) and TEIC + TAZ/PIPC cohort (n = 58). AKI was defined as serum creatinine increase ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 h or ≥50% from baseline. Incidence of AKI in TEIC cohort before and after propensity score matching was 9.3 and 5.9%, respectively, and that in TEIC + TAZ/PIPC cohort was 10.3 and 11.8%. AKI incidence and risk were not significantly different between two cohorts before (p = 0.829; odds ratio (OR) 1.122, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.393-3.202) and after matching (p = 0.244; OR 2.133, 95% CI 0.503-9.043). Logistic regression analysis with factors clinically or mechanistically potentially related to TEIC-associated AKI, including concomitant TAZ/PIPC use, as independent variables identified baseline hemoglobin level as the only significant risk factor for TEIC-associated AKI (p = 0.011; OR 0.484, 95% CI 0.276-0.848). In HM patients treated with TEIC, concomitant TAZ/PIPC use did not increase AKI risk whereas lower hemoglobin levels had higher risk for TEIC-associated AKI development, suggesting the necessity to monitor serum creatinine when using TEIC in patients with anemia.

Impact of first-line dalbavancin for cellulitis on hospital admissions and costs: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with cellulitis are treated with oral antibiotics as outpatients, but some require hospital admission for intravenous antibiotics. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board in Wales approved use of dalbavancin as first-line intravenous antibiotic from April to December 2020 to facilitate early discharge and prevent hospital admission. OBJECTIVES: To report cost savings and admission avoidance through first-line intravenous use of dalbavancin for cellulitis in one health board in Wales. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cellulitis who presented to the emergency department or medical assessment unit at Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board's two hospitals between April and December 2020 were identified for treatment with dalbavancin, because they had not responded to oral antibiotics or their initial presentation warranted intravenous antibiotics. Patients received 1500 mg dalbavancin by intravenous infusion according to prescribing information and were sent home without being admitted. Outcomes were admission within 30 d of dalbavancin and cost savings from avoiding admission. RESULTS: 31 patients were treated with dalbavancin for cellulitis in the emergency department or medical assessment unit. No patient was admitted within 30 d of receiving dalbavancin. Use of dalbavancin is estimated to have saved 248 bed-days over the study period, with an estimated saving of $120,444.23 based on avoidance of admission. The cost of dalbavancin for these 31 patients was $69,959.08, giving an overall cost saving of $50,485.15 ($1529.95 per patient). CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing dalbavancin as first-line intravenous antibiotic for cellulitis prevents admission, saving bed-days and admission-related costs.

Head-to-head comparison of multi-dose oritavancin and dalbavancin for complicated infections: A propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oritavancin and dalbavancin are long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotics approved for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. Recently, they have been used for outpatient antimicrobial therapy for complicated infections. No head-to-head studies exist for this purpose. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of patients treated with multiple doses of oritavancin or dalbavancin for complicated infections. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study evaluating adult patients who received two or more doses of lipoglycopeptides for complicated infections from February 2019 through December 2022. Patients receiving oritavancin were compared to dalbavancin after propensity score-matching. The primary endpoint was clinical success at 90 days. Other endpoints included: 30-day re-admission, 30-day mortality, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and changes in white blood cell count and inflammatory markers after the first dose. RESULTS: After exclusions and propensity score-matching, 131 matched pairs (N = 262) were included in the analysis. Most patients were receiving lipoglycopeptide therapy for osteomyelitis. There was no significant difference in clinical success at 90 days in patients who received oritavancin compared to those who received dalbavancin (99 [76%] vs. 103 [79%], respectively; P = 0.556). There was no significant difference in secondary endpoints, however, there was a trend towards higher incidence of ADRs oritavancin compared to dalbavancin (9 [7%] vs. 2 [2%], respectively; P = 0.060) which led to more treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in efficacy between multi-dose oritavancin and dalbavancin for the treatment of complicated infections. Both agents were generally well tolerated; however, dalbavancin may be better tolerated when long-term treatment is warranted.

Cost evaluation of continuation of therapy with dalbavancin compared to standard-of-care antibiotics alone in hospitalized persons who inject drugs with severe gram-positive infections.

PURPOSE: Persons who inject drugs (PWID) are at risk for severe gram-positive infections and may require prolonged hospitalization and intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy. Dalbavancin (DBV) is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide that may reduce costs and provide effective treatment in this population. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of PWID with severe gram-positive infections. Patients admitted from January 1, 2017, to November 1, 2019 (standard-of-care [SOC] group) and from November 15, 2019, to March 31, 2022 (DBV group) were included. The primary outcome was the total cost to the healthcare system. Secondary outcomes included hospital days saved and treatment failure. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included (37 in the DBV group and 50 in the SOC group). Patients were a median of 34 years old and were predominantly Caucasian (82%). Staphylococcus aureus (82%) was the most common organism, and bacteremia (71%) was the most common type of infection. Compared to the SOC group, the DBV group would have had a median of 14 additional days of hospitalization if they had stayed to complete their therapy (P = 0.014). The median total cost to the healthcare system was significantly lower in the DBV group than in the SOC group ($31,698.00 vs $45,093.50; P = 0.035). The rate of treatment failure was similar between the groups (32.4% in the DBV group vs 36% in the SOC group; P = 0.729). CONCLUSION: DBV is a cost-saving alternative to SOC IV antibiotics for severe gram-positive infections in PWID, with similar treatment outcomes. Larger prospective studies, including other patient populations, may demonstrate additional benefit.

In-label, off-label prescription, efficacy and tolerability of dalbavancin: report from a National Registry.

PURPOSE: Although dalbavancin is currently approved for the treatment of ABSSIs, several studies suggest its efficacy and tolerance as long-term therapy for other off-label indications requiring prolonged intravenous antibiotic administration. METHODS: We conducted a prospective nationwide study of dalbavancin use in real-life settings for both approved and off-label indications analysing for each case the clinical and microbiological characteristics of infection the efficacy and safety of treatments. RESULTS: During the study period (from December 2018 to July 2021), the ID specialists from 14 different centres enrolled 223 patients treated with dalbavancin [141 males (63%) and 82 females (37%); male/female ratio 1.72; mean age 59 (SD 17.2) years, (range 15-96). Most patients in the study population (136/223; 61.0%) came from community rather than health care facilities and most of them were visited in Infectious Diseases wards (93/223; 41.7%) and clinics (55/223; 24.7%) even though some patients were cured in other settings, such as surgery wards (18/223; 8.1%), orthopaedic wards (11/223; 4.9%), Emergency Rooms (7/223; 3.1%) and non-surgical other than ID wards (6/223; 2.7%). The most common ID diagnoses were osteomyelitis (44 cases/223; 19.7%; of which 29 acute and 15 chronic osteomyelitis), cellulitis (28/223; 12.5%), cutaneous abscess (23/223; 10.3%), orthopaedic prosthesis-associated infection (22/223; 9.9%), surgical site infection (20/223; 9.0%) and septic arthritis (15/223; 6.7%). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, by virtue of its PK/PD properties, dalbavancin represents a valuable option to daily in-hospital intravenous or outpatient antimicrobial regimens also for off-label indications requiring a long-term treatment of Gram-positive infections.

Clinical predictors of nephrotoxicity associated with teicoplanin: Meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antibiotic against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. However, the impact of clinical characteristics on nephrotoxicity associated with teicoplanin has not been determined. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the relationship between clinical characteristics and nephrotoxicity associated with teicoplanin. We identified clinical research published from January 1975 to June 2021 using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, which described the nephrotoxicity associated with teicoplanin. Meta-analysis determined the incidence of nephrotoxicity. Using meta-regression analysis, we evaluated the impact of clinical characteristics on outcomes. Of the 567 articles, eight articles including 634 patients were analysed. The overall incidence of nephrotoxicity associated with teicoplanin was 11.0% (95% confidence interval: 8.0-13.0) for the fixed-effect model. Additionally, patients with >65 years had a high trend for the risk of nephrotoxicity compared to those with ≤65 years (>65 years; 12.0% [95% confidence interval: 9.0-15.0] vs. ≤65 years; 7.0% [95% confidence interval: 3.0-12.0], p = 0.09) for the fixed-effect model. Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that only serum albumin level negatively correlated with the risk of nephrotoxicity (y = -17.0 x + 56.7, r = 0.74, p = 0.01). This meta-analysis ascertained that hypoalbuminemia leads to nephrotoxicity associated with teicoplanin.

In vitro additive effects of dalbavancin and rifampicin against biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus.

Dalbavancin is a novel glycopeptide antibiotic approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). It is characterized by a potent activity against numerous Gram-positive pathogens, a long elimination half-life and a favorable safety profile. Most recently, its application for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) was introduced. The aim of this study was to proof our hypothesis, that dalbavancin shows superior efficacy against staphylococcal biofilms on polyethylene (PE) disk devices compared with vancomycin and additive behavior in combination with rifampicin. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms were formed on PE disk devices for 96 h and subsequently treated with dalbavancin, vancomycin, rifampicin and dalbavancin-rifampicin combination at different concentrations. Quantification of antibacterial activity was determined by counting colony forming units (CFU/ml) after sonification of the PE, serial dilution of the bacterial suspension and plating on agar-plates. Biofilms were additionally life/dead-stained and visualized using fluorescence microscopy. Dalbavancin presented superior anti-biofilm activity compared to vancomycin. Additive effects of the combination dalbavancin and rifampicin were registered. Dalbavancin combined with rifampicin presents promising anti-biofilm activity characteristics in vitro. Further in vivo studies are necessary to establish recommendations for the general use of dalbavancin in the treatment of PJIs.

Higher Teicoplanin Blood Level Needed in Elderly Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Significant changes in the pathophysiology of older critically ill patients may affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of teicoplanin. This study aimed to determine the optimal teicoplanin blood level in this patient population. METHODS: 128 older critically ill and 86 older non-critically ill patients were involved and analyzed. RESULTS: The target thresholds of teicoplanin blood concentrations in older critically ill patients and non-critically ill patients should be 31.4mg/L and 15.3mg/L, respectively. The dose of teicoplanin in older critically ill patients should be greater than 800 mg to achieve the target blood level. CONCLUSION: An individualized dosing approach of teicoplanin based on therapeutic drug monitoring is necessary for older critically ill patients.

Usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring in estimating the duration of dalbavancin optimal target attainment in staphylococcal osteoarticular infections: a proof-of-concept.

Dalbavancin is increasingly used for the treatment of staphylococcal osteoarticular infections (OIs). Some population pharmacokinetic studies suggest that a regimen of two 1500 mg doses 1 week apart could ensure effective treatment for several weeks. Here we aim to provide clinicians with a proof-of-concept of the potential role that therapeutic drug monitoring may have in giving real-time feedback of the estimated duration of optimal treatment of staphylococcal OIs with dalbavancin in each single patient.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Teicoplanin and Its Dosing Recommendations for Neutropenic Patients With Augmented Renal Clearance for Hematological Malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Plasma teicoplanin concentrations do not reach the therapeutic range in several patients with hematological malignancies. Nevertheless, the characteristics of the population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models have not been clarified for malignancy. The decrease in the teicoplanin concentration in patients with cancer has been attributed to augmented renal clearance (ARC). It is essential to identify the causative factors of ARC to construct a PPK model to optimize the administration method. The authors aimed to establish a PPK model and develop an appropriate dosing regimen for teicoplanin in patients with hematological malignancies. METHODS: PPK analysis was performed using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data from 119 patients with hematological malignancies. The developed model was verified by predictive performance. RESULTS: The covariates affecting systemic clearance were serum creatinine, presence or absence of neutropenia (<500/µL), and body size descriptor. Patients with hematologic malignancies and neutropenia showed a 25% increase in clearance compared with those with a normal neutrophil count. The PPK model was constructed based on the presence or absence of neutropenia. This model allowed the selection of the most appropriate dosage regimen out of those recommended by the TDM guidelines for patients with eGFR of >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The PPK model predicted a dosing regimen for achieving a 10% improvement in the coverage probability of the target concentration range during the loading and maintenance phases. CONCLUSIONS: The PPK model may help optimize dose regimens and evaluate dosing methods, using comparative simulations, in patients with hematological malignancies.

Optimization of dosing regimens of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in neutropenic patients with cancer by Monte Carlo simulations.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of various dosing regimens of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in neutropenic patients with cancer. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted using pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic data to determine cumulative fraction of response (CFRs) in terms of area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibition concentration target. Currently clinical standard dosing regimens of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin were insufficient to provide expected CFRs against MRSA for neutropenic patients with cancer. The high dosing regimens of vancomycin (3500 mg/d), teicoplanin (800 mg/d) and daptomycin (8 mg/kg/d) could provide CFRs of ≥ 80%, showing a higher treatment success. However, the majority of CFRs with linezolid simulated dosing regimens reached < 80% against MRSA. Therefore, a strategy of high dosages of vancomycin, teicoplanin and daptomycin may be needed to attain optimal therapeutic efficacy against MRSA in neutropenic patients with cancer.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the safety of dalbavancin.

BACKGROUND: Dalbavancin is a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial agent with activity against Gram-positive bacteria including anaerobes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Meta-analysis of randomized control trials and large case series (more than 20 patients), were identified by searching Pubmed and Cochrane databases through 14 December 2020. RESULTS: 3,073 patients from 6 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Treatment emergent adverse effects were described in 30.6% dalbavancin patients, and 38.1% patients with other treatments. Our meta-analysis supports favorable results for dalbavancin treatment (OR 0.79; 95%CI 0.66-0.94; p = 0.01). 2.74% dalbavancin patients had to discontinue treatment versus 2.49% patients on other antibiotics. 4.80% dalbavancin patients versus 5.30% patients with other treatments had severe adverse events. 0.31% in the dalbavancin group and 0.95% receiving other antibiotics died. There was no statistically significant difference in severe adverse effects with OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.52-1.14; p = 0.19. Dalbavancin therapy was shown to have statistically significant lower mortality rate (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.07-0.90; p = 0.03). Observational studies reported few side effects but included a heterogeneous population of patients concerning their diagnosis and the duration of antibiotic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Dalbavancin has comparable safety profile relative to other antibiotics and is well-tolerated.