Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 281
Filtrar
1.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 64(2): 243-252, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34420205

RESUMEN

AIM: To determine whether a task-specific physiotherapist-led training approach is more effective than a non-specific parent-led home programme for attaining bicycle-riding goals in ambulant children with cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: Sixty-two ambulant children with CP aged 6 to 15 years (33 males, 29 females, mean age 9y 6mo) with bicycle-riding goals participated in this multi-centre, assessor-blind, parallel-group, superiority randomized controlled trial. Children in the task-specific group participated in a physiotherapist-led, group-based, intensive training programme. Children in the parent-led home group were provided with a practice schedule, generic written information, and telephone support. Both programmes involved a 1-week training period. The primary outcome was goal attainment at 1 week after training measured using the Goal Attainment Scale. Secondary outcomes included bicycle skills, participation in bicycle riding, functional skills, self-perception, physical activity, and health-related quality of life at 1 week and 3 months after training. RESULTS: Children in the task-specific training group had greater odds of goal attainment than those in the parent-led home programme at 1 week after intervention (odds ratio [OR] 10.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8-38.6), with evidence for superiority retained at 3 months (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.3-12.5). INTERPRETATION: The task-specific physiotherapist-led training approach was more effective for attaining bicycle-riding goals than a non-specific parent-led home programme in ambulant children with CP.


Asunto(s)
Ciclismo , Parálisis Cerebral/rehabilitación , Terapia por Ejercicio , Rehabilitación Neurológica , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Adolescente , Niño , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Femenino , Objetivos , Humanos , Masculino , Rehabilitación Neurológica/métodos , Rehabilitación Neurológica/organización & administración , Padres , Fisioterapeutas
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(31): e26861, 2021 Aug 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34397862

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) can improve clinical indicators in patients with cardiovascular diseases. The literature reports a 20% reduction in all-cause mortality and a 27% reduction in heart-disease mortality following CR. Although its clinical efficacy has been established, there is uncertainty whether center-based (CBCR) is more effective than home-based (HBCR) programs in acute and subacute phases. We aimed to verify significant differences in their effectiveness for the improvement of cardiopulmonary function by analyzing cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) with laboratory tests following both CR programs.A single-center cohort study of 37 patients, recently diagnosed with underlying cardiovascular diseases, underwent CBCR(18) and HBCR(19). CBCR group performed a supervised exercise regimen at the CR center, for 1 hour, 2 to 3 days a week, for a total of 12 to18 weeks. HBCR group completed a self-monitored exercise program at home under the same guidelines as CBCR. Participants were evaluated by CPX with laboratory tests at 1- and 6-month, following the respective programs.There was no statistical significance in clinical characteristics and laboratory findings. Pre-post treatment comparison showed significant improvement in VO2/kg, minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope, breathing reserve, tidal volume (VT), heart rate recovery, oxygen consumption per heart rate, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), LDL/HDL ratio, total cholesterol, ejection fraction (EF) (P < .05). CBCR approach showed greater improvement with significance in VO2/kg, metabolic equivalents, and EF on between groups analysis (P < .05).The time effect of CPX test and laboratory data showed improvement in cardiopulmonary function and serum indicators for both groups. VO2/kg, metabolic equivalents, and EF were among the variables that showed significant differences between groups. In the acute and subacute phases of 1 to 6 months, the CBCR group showed a greater cardiac output improvement than the HBCR group.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/sangre , Rehabilitación Cardiaca , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Terapia por Ejercicio , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Rehabilitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Rehabilitación Cardiaca/métodos , Rehabilitación Cardiaca/normas , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/sangre , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Prueba de Esfuerzo/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , República de Corea/epidemiología , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria/métodos , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 643, 2021 May 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34053445

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Exercise is efficacious for people living after a cancer diagnosis. However, implementation of exercise interventions in real-world settings is challenging. Implementation outcomes are defined as 'the effects of deliberate and purposive actions to implement new treatments, practices, and services'. Measuring implementation outcomes is a practical way of evaluating implementation success. This systematic review explores the implementation outcomes of exercise interventions evaluated under real-world conditions for cancer care. METHODS: Using PRISMA guidelines, an electronic database search of Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, SportsDiscus, Scopus and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and February 2020. The Moving through Cancer registry was hand searched. The Implementation Outcomes Framework guided data extraction. Inclusion criteria were adult populations with a cancer diagnosis. Efficacy studies were excluded. RESULTS: Thirty-seven articles that described 31 unique programs met the inclusion criteria. Implementation outcomes commonly evaluated were feasibility (unique programs n = 17, 54.8%) and adoption (unique programs n = 14, 45.2%). Interventions were typically delivered in the community (unique programs n = 17, 58.6%), in groups (unique programs n = 14, 48.3%) and supervised by a qualified health professional (unique programs n = 14, 48.3%). Implementation outcomes infrequently evaluated were penetration (unique programs n = 1, 3.2%) and sustainability (unique programs n = 1, 3.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise studies need to measure and evaluate implementation outcomes under real-world conditions. Robust measurement and reporting of implementation outcomes can help to identify what strategies are essential for successful implementation of exercise interventions. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Understanding how exercise interventions can be successful implemented is important so that people living after a cancer diagnosis can derive the benefits of exercise.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/educación , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Neoplasias/rehabilitación , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Terapia por Ejercicio/educación , Terapia por Ejercicio/psicología , Humanos , Neoplasias/psicología , Supervivencia
4.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 103(16): 1473-1481, 2021 08 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33999877

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries can be treated with or without ACL reconstruction (ACLR), and more high-quality studies evaluating outcomes after the different treatment courses are needed. The purpose of the present study was to describe and compare 5-year clinical, functional, and physical activity outcomes for patients who followed our decision-making and treatment algorithm and chose (1) early ACLR with preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, (2) delayed ACLR with preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, or (3) progressive rehabilitation alone. Early ACLR was defined as that performed ≤6 months after the preoperative rehabilitation program, and late ACLR was defined as that performed >6 months after the preoperative rehabilitation program. METHODS: We included 276 patients from a prospective cohort study. The patients had been active in jumping, pivoting, and cutting sports before the injury and sustained a unilateral ACL injury without substantial concomitant knee injuries. The patients chose their treatment through a shared decision-making process. At 5 years, we assessed the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Marx Activity Rating Scale, sports participation, quadriceps muscle strength, single-legged hop performance, and new ipsilateral and contralateral knee injuries. RESULTS: The 5-year follow-up rate was 80%. At 5 years, 64% of the patients had undergone early ACLR, 11% had undergone delayed ACLR, and 25% had had progressive rehabilitation alone. Understandably, the choices that participants made differed by age, concomitant injuries, symptoms, and predominantly level-I versus level-II preinjury activity level. There were no significant differences in any clinical, functional, or physical activity outcomes among the treatment groups. Across treatment groups, 95% to 100% of patients were still active in some kind of sports and 65% to 88% had IKDC-SKF and KOOS scores above the threshold for a patient acceptable symptom state. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ACL injury who were active in jumping, pivoting, and cutting sports prior to injury; who had no substantial concomitant knee injuries; and who followed our decision-making and treatment algorithm had good 5-year knee function and high sport participation rates. Three of 4 patients had undergone ACLR within 5 years. There were no significant differences in any outcomes among patients treated with early ACLR, delayed ACLR, or progressive rehabilitation alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/terapia , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Vías Clínicas , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/fisiopatología , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/estadística & datos numéricos , Atletas/estadística & datos numéricos , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Delaware , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Noruega , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/organización & administración , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Volver al Deporte/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
5.
Rheumatol Int ; 41(2): 391-401, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33244645

RESUMEN

Supervised group exercise (SGE) is recommended for people with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Recent literature suggests that its contents and dosage must probably be revised. As a first step towards renewal, this study examined the current SGE organisation and content for people with axSpA in The Netherlands. A pen-and-paper survey was sent to the boards of the 82 local patient associations affiliated with the Dutch Arthritis Society in 2016. One member of each board was asked to complete questions on the nature and organisation of SGE and one of the supervising therapists to complete questions on the SGE supervision and contents. The questionnaire was returned by representatives of 67/82 (82%) local patient associations, of which 17 (25%) provided axSpA-specific SGE (16/17 SGE programmes with both land-based exercise and hydrotherapy and 1/17 with only hydrotherapy). These involved in total 56 groups with 684 participants and 59 supervisors, of whom 54 were physical therapists and 21 had had postgraduate education on rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Besides mobility and strengthening exercises and sports (17/17), most programmes included aerobic exercise (10/17), but rarely with heart rate monitoring (1/17), patient education (8/17), periodic assessments (2/17), or exercise personalisation (1/17). In the Netherlands, a quarter of local patient associations organised axSpA-specific SGE, mostly containing land-based exercises combined with sports and hydrotherapy. Most supervisors lacked postgraduate education on RMDs and most programmes lacked intensity monitoring, patient education, periodic assessments, and personalisation, which are needed for optimising exercise programmes according to current scientific insights.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Ejercicio Físico , Espondiloartritis/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Terapia por Ejercicio/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Hidroterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Países Bajos , Proyectos Piloto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
R I Med J (2013) ; 103(9): 30-33, 2020 Nov 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33126784

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traditional rehabilitation services, whether they are cardiac, pulmonary, or vascular, consist of 6-36 center-based, supervised sessions; however, due to COVID-19, in-person visits were suspended. This study sought to implement a transitional home-based treatment plan (HBTP) to patients. METHOD: Patients enrolled in a rehabilitation service at the Miriam Hospital during the time of temporary closure were provided with a HBTP that was individualized to their needs and multi-disciplinary in nature. Patients were called weekly for continual guidance and support. RESULTS: Of the 129 patients that received a HBTP, 115 (89%) participated in follow-up correspondence (63±12 years, 83% white, 66% male, 81% enrolled in cardiac rehab). Nearly 70% of patients continued to participate in regular exercise and upon re-opening, 69 (60%) of patients returned to center-based care. Psychosocial factors appeared to inhibit treatment adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients are receptive to an HBTP and subsequent follow-up throughout temporary closure of rehabilitation services.


Asunto(s)
Rehabilitación Cardiaca/métodos , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Cardiopatías/rehabilitación , Enfermedades Pulmonares/rehabilitación , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Enfermedades Vasculares/rehabilitación , Adaptación Psicológica , Anciano , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Femenino , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Nutricional/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Terapia por Relajación/métodos , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis ; 15: 2127-2133, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32982205

RESUMEN

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an important, evidence-based treatment that improves outcomes for people with COPD. Individualized exercise programmes aim to improve exercise capacity; self-management education and psychological support are also provided. Translating increased exercise capacity into sustained behavioural change of increased physical activity is difficult. Other unresolved problems with PR programmes include improving uptake, completion, response and sustaining long-term benefit. We offer a different perspective drawn from clinical experience of PR, quantitative and qualitative studies of singing groups for people with COPD, and stroke rehabilitation research that gives psychological factors a more central role in determining outcomes after PR. We discuss Take Charge; a simple but effective psychological intervention promoting self-management--that could be used as part of a PR programme or in situations where PR was declined or unavailable. This may be particularly relevant now when traditional face-to-face group programmes have been disrupted by COVID-19 precautions.


Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Terapia por Ejercicio , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Investigación en Rehabilitación , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Sistemas de Apoyo Psicosocial , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/psicología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/rehabilitación , Proyectos de Investigación , SARS-CoV-2 , Automanejo/métodos , Automanejo/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 562, 2020 Jun 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32571316

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Technical applications can promote home-based exercise and physical activity of community-dwelling stroke survivors. Caregivers are often able and willing to assist with home-based exercise and physical activity but lack the knowledge and resources to do so. ActivABLES was established to promote home-based exercise and physical activity among community-dwelling stroke survivors, with support from their caregivers. The aim of our study is to investigate the feasibility of ActivABLES in terms of acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality. METHODS: A convergent design of mixed methods research in which quantitative results were combined with personal experiences of a four-week use of ActivABLES by community-dwelling stroke survivors with support from their caregivers. Data collection before, during and after the four-week period included the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) and Five Times Sit to Stand Test (5xSST) and data from motion detectors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with stroke survivors and caregivers after the four-week period. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data. Qualitative data was analysed with direct content analysis. Themes were identified related to the domains of feasibility: acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality. Data was integrated by examining any (dis)congruence in the quantitative and qualitative findings. RESULTS: Ten stroke survivors aged 55-79 years participated with their informal caregivers. Functional improvements were shown in BBS (+ 2.5), ABC (+ 0.9), TUG (- 4.2) and 5xSST (- 2.7). More physical activity was detected with motion detectors (stand up/sit down + 2, number of steps + 227, standing + 0.3 h, hours sitting/lying - 0.3 h). The qualitative interviews identified themes for each feasibility domain: (i) acceptability: appreciation, functional improvements, self-initiated activities and expressed potential for future stroke survivors; (2) demand: reported use, interest in further use and need for follow-up; (3) implementation: importance of feedback, variety of exercises and progression of exercises and (4) practicality: need for support and technical problems. The quantitative and qualitative findings converged well with each other and supported the feasibility of ActivABLES. CONCLUSIONS: ActivABLES is feasible and can be a good asset for stroke survivors with slight or moderate disability to use in their homes. Further studies are needed with larger samples.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular/métodos , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Anciano , Personas con Discapacidad , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Vida Independiente , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Cualitativa , Apoyo Social , Sobrevivientes/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(12): 6035-6043, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32291598

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Assess the barriers and facilitators to implementing an exercise-based rehabilitation program in an acute setting for cancer survivors receiving treatment. METHODS: A qualitative study using individual semi-structured interviews and focus groups was completed with 25 clinicians working in oncology and 9 patients receiving cancer treatment who were purposively sampled at a tertiary hospital. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim with coding completed independently by two reviewers and confirmed by a third reviewer, followed by thematic analysis. RESULTS: The main theme was finding the 'right time' for rehabilitation. Exercise-based rehabilitation was seen as important to deliver in the acute cancer treatment setting but challenging due to patient factors such as feeling overwhelmed and health service constraints. Barriers and facilitators to acute exercise-based rehabilitation were raised under four sub-themes: attitudes, knowledge, convenience and resources. There was agreement among both patients and clinicians around the main themes. CONCLUSION: Implementing exercise-based rehabilitation in the acute cancer treatment setting is viewed as necessary but challenging to implement. Positive attitudes towards exercise-based cancer rehabilitation services from staff and patients in this study are at odds with current levels of service delivery. This study provides evidence for why this might be the case, and can be used to inform the design of future models of rehabilitation in the acute treatment setting to meet the needs of this patient group.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio , Neoplasias/rehabilitación , Pacientes/psicología , Percepción , Médicos/psicología , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Terapia por Ejercicio/psicología , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Ciencia de la Implementación , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias/psicología , Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación Cualitativa , Centros de Atención Terciaria
10.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(11): 5291-5298, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32112353

RESUMEN

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is a life-saving technology that can cure otherwise incurable diseases, but imposes significant physiologic stress upon recipients. This stress leads to short-term toxicity and mid- to long-term physical function impairment in some recipients. Exercise interventions have demonstrated preliminary efficacy in preserving physical function in HCT recipients, but the role of these interventions prior to HCT (prehabilitative) is less known. We tested a 5- to 12-week, prehabilitative higher intensity home-based aerobic exercise intervention in a randomized study of alloHCT candidates. Of 113 patients screened, 34 were randomized to control or intervention groups, 16 underwent pre- and post-intervention peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) testing, and 12 underwent pre- and post-intervention 6-min walk distance (6MWD) testing. No significant differences in VO2peak or 6MWD were seen pre- to post-intervention between intervention and control groups, but final numbers of evaluable participants in each group were too small to draw inferences regarding the efficacy of the intervention. We conclude that the design of our prehabilitative intervention was not feasible in this pilot randomized study, and make recommendations regarding the design of future exercise intervention studies in alloHCT.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Proyectos Piloto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(11): 5281-5289, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32103358

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study assessed the effectiveness of the Better Life After Cancer: Energy, Strength, and Support (BLESS) program, a 12-week social capital-based exercise adherence program for breast cancer survivors (BCS), regarding cancer-related fatigue (CRF), quality of life (QOL), physical activity, and psychosocial characteristics. METHODS: Forty-eight BCS with moderate or high (≥ 4) CRF participated in this randomized control trial (intervention group n = 23, control group n = 25). The intervention group participated in small group sessions to activate social capital while targeting CRF in supervised physical exercises supplemented by home-based physical exercises. The control group was only given written information on exercise. A questionnaire was used to assess CRF, QOL, physical activity, depression, anxiety, sleep quality, and social capital. RESULTS: The majority of participants had undergone surgery less than 2 years ago. After participating in BLESS, the CRF behavioral/severity domain significantly decreased (t = 2.642, p = 0.011) and physical activity significantly increased (t = - 2.049, p = 0.046) in the intervention group, in comparison with the control group; there were no significant post-intervention differences in the control group. Both groups showed improvements in sleep quality, depression, anxiety, and QOL. CONCLUSION: The BLESS program decreased behavioral/severity in the CRF and increased physical activity after 12 weeks among BCS. Future research needs to evaluate whether the promising results on physical activity and behavioral fatigue observed in the short term will persist over time. Also, longer-term effects should be examined.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/rehabilitación , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Fatiga/terapia , Cooperación del Paciente , Adulto , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Fatiga/epidemiología , Fatiga/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Calidad de Vida , República de Corea/epidemiología , Capital Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
12.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 21(1): 67, 2020 Feb 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32013914

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A previous randomized clinical trial found that a Group Physical Therapy (PT) program for knee osteoarthritis yielded similar improvements in pain and function compared with traditional individual PT. Based on these findings the Group PT program was implemented in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System. The objective of this study was to evaluate implementation metrics and changes in patient-level measures following implementation of the Group PT program. METHODS: This was a one-year prospective observational study. The Group PT program involved 6 weekly sessions. Implementation metrics included numbers of referrals and completed sessions. Patient-level measures were collected at the first and last PT sessions and included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC; self-report of pain, stiffness and function (range 0-96)) and a 30-s chair rise test. RESULTS: During the evaluation period, 152 patients were referred, 80 had an initial session scheduled, 71 completed at least one session and 49 completed at least 5 sessions. The mean number of completed appointments per patient was 4.1. Among patients completing baseline and follow-up measures, WOMAC scores (n = 33) improved from 56.8 (SD = 15.8) to 46.9 (SD = 14.0); number of chair rises (n = 38) completed in 30 s increased from 10.4 (SD = 5.1) to 11.9 (SD = 5.0). CONCLUSIONS: Patients completing the Group PT program in this implementation phase showed clinically relevant improvements comparable to those observed in the previous clinical trial that compared group and individual PT for knee osteoarthritis. These results are important because Group PT can improve efficiency and access compared with individual PT. However, there were some limitations with respect to attendance and completion rates, and program adaptations may be needed to optimize these implementation metrics. Larger, longer-term studies are required to more fully evaluate the effectiveness of this program.


Asunto(s)
Artralgia/terapia , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/rehabilitación , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Anciano , Artralgia/diagnóstico , Artralgia/etiología , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/complicaciones , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Autoinforme/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organización & administración , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
Trials ; 21(1): 46, 2020 Jan 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31915043

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Falls are two to four times more frequent amongst older adults living in long-term care (LTC) than community-dwelling older adults and have deleterious consequences. It is hypothesised that a progressive exercise program targeting balance and strength will reduce fall rates when compared to a seated exercise program and do so cost effectively. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial with blinded assessment of outcome and intention-to-treat analysis. LTC residents (age ≥ 65 years) will be recruited from LTC facilities in New Zealand. Participants (n = 528 total, with a 1:1 allocation ratio) will be randomly assigned to either a novel exercise program (Staying UpRight), comprising strength and balance exercises designed specifically for LTC and acceptable to people with dementia (intervention group), or a seated exercise program (control group). The intervention and control group classes will be delivered for 1 h twice weekly over 1 year. The primary outcome is rate of falls (per 1000 person years) within the intervention period. Secondary outcomes will be risk of falling (the proportion of fallers per group), fall rate relative to activity exposure, hospitalisation for fall-related injury, change in gait variability, volume and patterns of ambulatory activity and change in physical performance assessed at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. Cost-effectiveness will be examined using intervention and health service costs. The trial commenced recruitment on 30 November 2018. DISCUSSION: This study evaluates the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a progressive strength and balance exercise program for aged care residents to reduce falls. The outcomes will aid development of evidenced-based exercise programmes for this vulnerable population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618001827224. Registered on 9 November 2018. Universal trial number U1111-1217-7148.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/organización & administración , Calidad de Vida , Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Terapia por Ejercicio/economía , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Femenino , Marcha/fisiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Masculino , Rendimiento Físico Funcional , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento , Poblaciones Vulnerables
14.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(3): 1335-1350, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31250182

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of conducting a rehabilitation program for patients following surgery for abdomino-pelvic cancer. METHODS: A non-randomised controlled before-and-after study. Patients who had undergone surgery for stage I-III abdomino-pelvic cancer (colorectal, gynaecological or prostate cancer) were recruited. The rehabilitation group (n = 84) received an 8-week, bi-weekly education and exercise program conducted by a physiotherapist, exercise physiologist, health psychologist and dietician, supplemented by exercise diaries and telephone coaching sessions. The comparator group (n = 104) completed postal questionnaires only. Feasibility measures, functional exercise capacity, muscle strength, physical activity levels, pelvic floor symptoms, anxiety and depression, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and self-efficacy were measured at baseline (time 1), immediately post-intervention (time 2) and at 6 months post-baseline (time 3) and compared within- and between-groups. RESULTS: The consent rate to the rehabilitation program was 24%. Eighty-one percent of the rehabilitation group attended 85-100% of 16 scheduled sessions. Overall satisfaction with the program was 96%. Functional exercise capacity, handgrip strength in males, bowel symptoms, physical activity levels, depression and HRQoL were significantly improved in the rehabilitation group (p < 0.05) at time 2. The improvements in all these outcomes were sustained at time 3. The rehabilitation group had significantly improved physical activity levels, depression and HRQoL compared with the comparator group at times 2 and 3 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Recruitment to this oncology rehabilitation program was more difficult than expected; however, attendance and patient satisfaction were high. This program had positive effects on several important clinical outcomes in patients following abdomino-pelvic cancer treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR 12614000580673.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Abdominales/rehabilitación , Neoplasias Abdominales/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/rehabilitación , Neoplasias Pélvicas/rehabilitación , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urogenitales/rehabilitación , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Fuerza de la Mano/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Diafragma Pélvico/fisiopatología , Diafragma Pélvico/cirugía , Proyectos Piloto , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urogenitales/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urogenitales/estadística & datos numéricos
15.
Disabil Rehabil ; 42(3): 368-377, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30325677

RESUMEN

Purpose: This study explored patient experiences of Guided graded Exercise Self-help (GES) delivered as part of a randomised controlled trial for people with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. The trial found that GES was better than specialist medical care at reducing fatigue and improving physical functioning.Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients reporting improvement (n = 9) and deterioration (n = 10), and analysis involved thematic "constant comparison."Results: The improved group described more facilitators to doing GES, and were more likely to describe high levels of self-motivation, whereas the deteriorated group described more barriers to GES (including worse exacerbation of symptoms after GES, greater interference from comorbid conditions, and obstacles to GES in their lives), and had been ill for longer. Having the capacity to do GES was important; of note, those with relatively lower levels of functioning sometimes had more time and space in their lives to support their GES engagement. We identified an important "indeterminate phase" early on, in which participants did not initially improve.Conclusions: GES may be improved by targeting those most likely to improve, and teaching about the indeterminate phase.Implications for rehabilitationUsing the Guided Exercise Self-help booklet alone is unlikely to be sufficient to support patients through Guided Exercise Self-help successfully.Additional guidance from skilled physiotherapists/health professionals who demonstrate an understanding of what it is like to cope with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis is also important.Those using Guided Exercise Self-help may need additional support through a commonly experienced "indeterminate phase" - an initial phase in the programme where few benefits, along with various challenges associated with increasing activity, are experienced.Individuals who have been ill with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis for a relatively longer period of time and/or have additional comorbid conditions may benefit from more bespoke therapies with greater health professionals input, delivered by appropriate therapists.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio , Ejercicio Físico , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica , Rendimiento Físico Funcional , Fisioterapeutas , Adaptación Psicológica , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Terapia por Ejercicio/psicología , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/psicología , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/rehabilitación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rol Profesional , Grupos de Autoayuda , Percepción Social
16.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 6(1): e000500, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31803476

RESUMEN

Background: The primary aim was to determine the healthcare utilisation benefits including respiratory-related hospital admissions, hospital admission days and emergency department presentations in the 0-12 and 12-24 months postpulmonary rehabilitation compared with the 12 months preprogramme. Methods: An observational, data-linkage design of 11 standardised pulmonary rehabilitation programmes were used. All programmes were 8 weeks in duration with two supervised exercise sessions per week and were required to use the national pulmonary rehabilitation recommendations with regard to programme organisation, exercise training guidelines and multidisciplinary education. For each participant with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), healthcare utilisation data were collected for the 12 months preprogramme and 24 months postprogramme. Results: 426 participants (231 males, FEV149.3 (19.6) % predicted) were studied. The number of respiratory admissions/participant/year decreased from 0.7 (1.1) in the 12 months preprogramme to 0.5 (1.9) in the 12 months postprogramme, p=0.083; but increased in the 12-24 months postprogramme to 1.0 (2.3), p<0.001. The hospital days/participant/year improved from 4.0 (7.8) days in the 12 months preprogramme to 2.5 (8.5) days in the 12 months postprogramme, p<0.001; but increased in the 12-24 months postprogramme to 6.1 (16.6) days, p=0.004. The emergency department presentations/participant/year improved from 1.15 (1.75) in the 12 months preprogramme to 0.9 (1.8) in the 12 months postprogramme, p=0.003; but increased in the 12-24 months postprogramme to 2.0 (3.3), p<0.001. Conclusion: Pulmonary rehabilitation significantly improves hospital days and emergency department presentations in the first 12 months postprogramme. Healthcare utilisation benefits in the second 12 months are less clear.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia por Ejercicio/economía , Terapia por Ejercicio/normas , Terapia por Ejercicio/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/economía , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/organización & administración , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/economía , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Transplant Proc ; 51(9): 2902-2905, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31606183

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Following the positive experience of the national project "A transplant...and now it's time for sport," the Transplant Reference Center of the Emilia-Romagna Region has pursued the promotion of pre- and post-transplant physical exercise by developing a network. METHODS: The path involved the transplant centers and operative units (UU.OO) who wanted to target transplant and waiting list patients, who are clinically stable, to perform personalized exercise through a program (supervised or not) prescribed by a specialist in sports medicine. With the collaboration of the Collective Prevention and Public Health Service, the network was established, consisting of the sports medicine centers and the gyms that promote health for adapted physical activity (PS-AMA). To implement the network, training courses for all the professionals involved (doctors, nurses, exercise specialists) and operational meetings in the transplant centers-nephrology units with patients' associations have been organized. RESULTS: To date, there are 14 transplant centers and UU.OO, 9 sports medicine centers, and 45 PS-AMA involved in this network. Seven training courses were organized with the participation of 193 health professionals. Since January 2016, there have been 65 transplanted patients and 5 patients on the waiting list who practice the prescribed exercise. Of these, 45 carry out supervised exercise in PS-AMA; 25 perform autonomous exercise. Each patient is monitored every 6 months. No problems related to the exercise performance were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The development of a network of professionals and associations is the key element to raise awareness of physical activity among transplanted and waiting-for-transplant patients, reducing the pathologies associated with a sedentary lifestyle.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Ejercicio Físico , Trasplante de Órganos/rehabilitación , Donantes de Tejidos , Femenino , Humanos , Deportes , Medicina Deportiva/métodos
18.
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng ; 27(9): 1824-1835, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31398126

RESUMEN

In this paper, we propose a machine learning-based virtual physical therapist (PT) system to enable personalized remote training for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Three physical therapy tasks with multiple difficulty levels are selected to help patients with PD improve balance and mobility. Patients' movements are captured by a Kinect sensor. Criteria for each task are carefully designed by our PT co-author such that the patient's performance can be evaluated in an automated manner. Given the patient's motion data, we propose a two-phase human action understanding algorithm TPHAU to understand the patient's movements, and an error identification model to identify the patient's movement errors. To enable automated task recommendation, a machine learning-based model is trained from real patient and PT data to provide accurate, personalized, and timely task update recommendation for patients with PD, thereby emulating a real PT's behavior. Real patient data have been collected in the clinic to train the models. Experiments show that the proposed methods achieve high accuracy in patient action understanding, error identification and task recommendation. The proposed virtual PT system has the potential of enabling on-demand virtual care and significantly reducing cost for both patients and care providers.


Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Automático , Fisioterapeutas , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/organización & administración , Interfaz Usuario-Computador , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Automatización , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Movimiento/fisiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/rehabilitación , Medicina de Precisión , Desempeño Psicomotor , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
19.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(12): 4435-4450, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31418074

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Based on randomized controlled trials, exercise is an efficacious strategy to improve quality of life (QOL) among cancer survivors. However, the effectiveness of exercise programs to improve QOL in real-world settings is unknown, as are factors related to external validity. This hinders dissemination and scalability. This scoping review synthesized published research on community-based exercise programs for cancer survivors and reported on the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM). METHODS: A systematic literature search identified community-based exercise programs for adult cancer survivors (1980-March 2018), that met the following inclusion criteria: at least one face-to-face exercise session, the primary aim of program evaluation (i.e., feasibility/effectiveness), and pre/post measure of QOL. Data were coded using the RE-AIM framework. The effect size was calculated for overall QOL. RESULTS: Electronic database search yielded 553 articles; 31 studies describing unique programs were included for review. All studies described at least one element of implementation and most (80.6%) reported a significant (p < .05) improvement in at least one subscale, or total QOL. Few studies reported on indicators of reach (16.1%), adoption (6.5%), individual (16.1%), or system-level maintenance (32.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Community-based exercise programs are effective for improving QOL in adult cancer survivors. Recommendations are provided to improve reporting across RE-AIM dimensions, which is an important step to enhance the scalability of programs and thus, the potential for exercise to be fully integrated into system-level standard care for cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Community-based exercise programs are a resource to improve QOL for adult cancer survivors.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Neoplasias/rehabilitación , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/métodos , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
20.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 917, 2019 Jul 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31288781

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Specialized, individualized exercise programs that increase self-efficacy (SE) are essential for the development and maintenance of regular exercise. The objective of this study is to examine the effect of customized exercise programs (CEPs) implemented by physical therapists in improving exercise-related SE and promoting behavioral changes among elderly individuals who do not exercise regularly compared with commonly prescribed exercises. METHODS: In this randomized controlled study, the sampling frame consisted of participants in an annual town-sponsored medical check-up. The inclusion criteria were no regular exercise and age of 65-74 years at enrollment. The subjects in the intervention group (CEP group) were instructed to perform individualized exercises prescribed based on an original algorithm. Data collection was performed at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after exercise instruction. The primary outcome was SE for exercise at the last time point. Secondary outcomes were SE for exercise, stage of change in exercise behavior, knee pain, and low back pain at each evaluation time point. RESULTS: Fifty subjects (CEP group n = 26; control group n = 24) were randomized. In the CEP group, 25 of 26 subjects were analyzed at 3 months, 26 of 26 subjects were analyzed at 6 and 9 months, and 25 of 26 subjects were analyzed at 12 months. In the control group, 23 of 24 subjects were analyzed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. SE for exercise improved 24.0% (CEP group 30.8%; control group 16.7%) compared to baseline. No significant differences were observed in the primary outcome. SE for exercise was significantly lower at 9 and 12 months compared with baseline in the control group. Stage of change for exercise behavior was significantly higher at 3 months compared with baseline in the CEP group and at 6 months in the control group. Knee pain was worse at 3 months compared with baseline in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that exercise instruction with CEPs contributes to the maintenance of SE for exercise and is useful for changing exercise behavior in elderly individuals who do not regularly exercise. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000027240 , registered on 03/05/2017.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Fisioterapeutas , Autoeficacia , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...