Carbon footprint of a laser unit: a study of two centres in the UK.

PURPOSE: Climate change has serious consequences for our wellbeing. Healthcare systems themselves contribute significantly to our total carbon footprint, of which emissions from surgical practice are a major component. The primary sources of emissions identified are anaesthetic gases, disposal of single-use equipment, energy usage, and travel to and from clinical areas. We sought to quantify the waste generated by laser surgery which, to our knowledge, has not been previously reported. METHODS: The carbon footprint of two laser centres operating within the United Kingdom were measured. The internationally recognised Greenhouse Gas Protocol was used as a guiding framework to classify sources of waste and conversion factors issued by the UK government were used to quantify emissions. RESULTS: The total carbon footprints per day at each unit were 299.181 carbon dioxide equivalents (kgCo2eq) and 121.512 kgCO2eq, respectively. We found the carbon footprint of individual laser treatments to be approximately 15 kgCO2eq per procedure. The biggest overall contributor to the carbon footprint was found to be the emissions generated from staff, patient and visitor travel. This was followed by electricity usage, and indirect emissions from physical waste and laundry. CONCLUSIONS: The carbon footprint of laser procedures was considerably less than the average surgical operation in the UK. This initial study measures the carbon footprint of a laser center in a clinical setting and allows us to identify where improvements can be made to eventually achieve a net carbon zero health care system.

Efficacy of long-term indomethacin therapy in prolonging pregnancy after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: a collaborative cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of long-term indomethacin therapy (LIT) in prolonging pregnancy and reducing spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) in patients undergoing fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS) for the management of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Collaborative multicentre study. POPULATION: Five hundred and fifty-seven consecutive TTTS cases that underwent FLS. METHODS: Long-term indomethacin therapy was defined as indomethacin use for at least 48 hours. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate the relative risk of PTB in the LIT group compared with a non-LIT group. Cox regression was used to evaluate the association between LIT use and FLS-to-delivery survival. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gestational age (GA) at delivery. RESULTS: Among the 411 pregnancies included, a total of 180 patients (43.8%) received LIT after FLS and 231 patients (56.2%) did not. Median GA at fetal intervention did not differ between groups (20.4 weeks). Median GA at delivery was significantly higher in the LIT group (33.6 weeks) compared with the non-LIT group (31.1 weeks; P < 0.001). FLS-to-delivery interval was significantly longer in the LIT group (P < 0.001). The risks of PTB before 34, 32, 28 and 26 weeks of gestation were all significantly lower in the LIT group compared with the non-LIT group (relative risks 0.69, 0.51, 0.37 and 0.18, respectively). The number needed to treat with LIT to prevent one PTB before 32 weeks of gestation was four, and to prevent one PTB before 34 weeks was five. CONCLUSION: Long-term indomethacin after FLS for TTTS was found to be associated with prolongation of pregnancy and reduced risk for PTB. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Long-term indomethacin used after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome is effective in prolonging pregnancy and reducing the risk for preterm birth; especially extreme preterm birth.

Fetal and neonatal brain lesions following laser ablation for twin-to-twin-transfusion-syndrome as detected by pre- and post-natal brain imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of and risk factors for fetal and neonatal brain lesions following laser ablation for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 83 women with monochorionic twin pregnancies who underwent ablation for TTTS at a single tertiary hospital. Post-laser survivors were followed-up with fetal neurosonogram every 2 weeks and fetal brain MRI at 28-32 weeks of gestation; post-natal brain imaging included neurosonogram. Cases with pre- and post-natal brain lesions were compared to those without. RESULTS: 153 fetuses survived the immediate post-laser period and underwent brain imaging. Of these, 17 (11.11%) exhibited brain lesions on prenatal imaging studies, and 36 (32.4%) on post-natal ultrasound. Later gestational age (GA) at the time of ablation (23.0 vs. 21.4 weeks, p = 0.0244), post-laser twin-anemia-polycythemia-sequence (TAPS) (29.41% vs. 9.56%, p = 0.035) and birthweight discordancy (30% vs. 9%, p = 0.0025) were associated with prenatal brain lesions. Earlier GA at delivery (31.0 weeks vs. 32.2, p = 0.0002) and post-laser TAPS (25% vs. 9.33%, p = 0.038) were associated with post-natal brain lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of ablation for TTTS are at risk for brain lesions, which can be detected prenatally. Incorporation of neurosonogram and fetal brain MRI into the routine surveillance of such pregnancies should be considered.

Dual demise following laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: Analysis of 52 cases at a single fetal surgery center.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate all individual cases of dual twin demise following laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). METHOD: This is an analysis of all monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations with TTTS complicated by dual demise following laser surgery from 2006 to 2019. Cases were reviewed by (1) a fetal surgeon researcher and (2) a panel of independent experienced maternal-fetal medicine specialists to code an etiology of demise for the donor and recipient, and to assess for possible preventability. RESULTS: Of 753 twins that underwent laser surgery for TTTS, 52 (6.9%) had postoperative dual demise. In this subgroup, gestational age at surgery was 19.5 (16.1-24.9) weeks, and 36 (69.2%) patients were Quintero stage III and IV. The most common etiology was the spectrum of disorders leading to preterm delivery, which included cervical insufficiency, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and preterm labor (44.2% and 48.1%, donor and recipient, respectively). Some degree of preventability was estimated for 23.1% of dual demises. CONCLUSIONS: The most common cause of dual demise post laser surgery for TTTS was preterm birth, reinforcing the need for studies regarding the etiology and prevention of post-fetoscopy prematurity. Nearly one-quarter of dual demise cases were deemed potentially preventable.

Choice and Trade-offs: Parent Decision Making for Neurotechnologies for Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

This qualitative study investigated factors that guide caregiver decision making and ethical trade-offs for advanced neurotechnologies used to treat children with drug-resistant epilepsy. Caregivers with affected children were recruited to semi-structured focus groups or interviews at one of 4 major epilepsy centers in Eastern and Western Canada and the USA (n = 22). Discussions were transcribed and qualitative analytic methods applied to examine values and priorities (eg, risks, benefits, adherence, invasiveness, reversibility) of caregivers pertaining to novel technologies to treat drug-resistant epilepsy. Discussions revealed 3 major thematic branches for decision making: (1) features of the intervention-risks and benefits, with an emphasis on an aversion to perceived invasiveness; (2) decision drivers-trust in the clinical team, treatment costs; and (3) quality of available information about neurotechnological options. Overall, caregivers' definition of treatment success is more expansive than seizure freedom. The full involvement of their values and priorities must be considered in the decision-making process.

Laser peripheral iridoplasty for chronic angle closure.

BACKGROUND: In at least a third of primary angle closure cases, appositional angle closure persists after laser peripheral iridotomy, and further intervention may be considered. Laser peripheral iridoplasty (LPIp) can be used in treating chronic angle closure when angle closure persists after laser peripheral iridotomy. Previous reviews have found insufficient data to determine its clinical effectiveness, compared to other interventions. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2008 and updated in 2012. It examines all studies to date to establish whether LPIp shows any effectiveness over other available treatment options. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of laser peripheral iridoplasty in the treatment of people with chronic angle closure, when compared to laser peripheral iridotomy, medical therapy or no further treatment. SEARCH METHODS: We searched various electronic databases. The date of the search was 20 December 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the use of LPIp in cases of suspected primary angle closure (PACS), confirmed primary angle closure (PAC), or primary chronic angle-closure glaucoma (PACG). We applied no restrictions with respect to gender, age or ethnicity of participants. Trials evaluating LPIp for acute attacks of angle closure were not eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two authors independently assessed studies for risk of bias using Cochrane's 'risk of bias' tool. We collected adverse effects information from the trials. MAIN RESULTS: We included four RCTs involving 252 participants (276 eyes). In total, three different methods of intervention were used and 15 outcomes reported, with different time points. We used narrative synthesis to describe the majority of the findings, as meta-analysis was only possible for a limited number of outcomes due to the variation in study design and outcomes assessed. Study Characteristics Participants were adults recruited from outpatient settings in the UK, Singapore, China and Korea with either PACS, PAC or PACG. All studies compared argon LPIp (as either a primary or secondary procedure) to an alternative intervention or no further treatment. Three studies were of parallel group design, and one within-person, randomised by eye. All studies showed elements of high risk of bias. Due to the nature of the intervention assessed, a lack of masking of both participants and assessors was noted in all trials. Findings Laser peripheral iridoplasty with iridotomy versus iridotomy alone as a primary procedure Two RCTs assessed the use of argon LPIp as a primary procedure with peripheral iridotomy, compared with peripheral iridotomy alone. However, neither study reported data for the primary outcome, disease progression. Argon LPIp showed no evidence of effect on: final mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at 3 months and 12 months (mean difference (MD) 0.39 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.07 to 1.85; I2 = 38%; 2 studies, 174 participants; low-certainty evidence); further surgical or laser intervention at 12 months (risk ratio (RR) 1.21, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.21; 1 study, 126 participants; low-certainty evidence); or mean number of additional medications required at 12 months (MD 0.10, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.54; 1 study, 126 participants; low-certainty evidence). Complications were assessed at 3 to 12 months (2 studies, 206 participants; low-certainty evidence) and found to be mild and uncommon, with comparable levels between groups. The only severe complication encountered was one case of malignant glaucoma in one study's argon LPIp group. Quality of life measures were not assessed. In the other study, investigators found that argon LPIp showed no evidence of effect on final mean anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) measurements, including anterior chamber depth (MD 0.00 mm, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.10; 24 participants, 48 eyes; very low-certainty evidence). Laser peripheral iridoplasty as a secondary procedure versus no treatment One RCT assessed the use of argon LPIp as a secondary procedure compared with no further treatment in 22 participants over three months. Disease progression, additional medications required, complications, further surgical or laser intervention, and quality of life outcomes were not assessed. There was only very low-certainty evidence regarding final maximum IOP value (MD -1.81 mmHg, 95% CI -3.11 to -0.51; very low-certainty evidence), with no evidence of effect on final minimum IOP values (MD -0.31 mmHg, 95% CI -1.93 to 1.31; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of argon LPIp on AS-OCT parameters. The trial did not report AS-OCT measurements for the control group. Laser peripheral iridoplasty as a secondary procedure versus medication One RCT assessed the use of argon LPIp as a secondary procedure compared with travoprost 0.004% in 80 participants over 12 months. The primary outcome of disease progression was reported for this method: argon LPIp showed no evidence of effect on mean final cup/disk ratio (MD -0.03, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.05; low-certainty evidence). Argon LPIp showed no evidence of effect for: mean change in IOP (MD -1.20 mmHg, 95% CI -2.87 to 0.47; low-certainty evidence) or mean number of additional medications (MD 0.42, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.61; low-certainty evidence). Further surgical intervention was required by one participant in the intervention group alone, with none in the control group  (low-certainty evidence). No serious adverse events were reported, with mild complications consisting of two cases of 'post-laser IOP spike' in the argon LPIp group. Quality of life measures were not assessed. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of argon LPIp on AS-OCT parameters. The trial did not report AS-OCT measurements for the control group. Adverse events Availability of data were limited for adverse effects. Similar rates were observed in control and intervention groups, where reported. Serious adverse events were rare. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: After reviewing the outcomes of four RCTs, argon LPIp as an intervention may be no more clinically effective than comparators in the management of people with chronic angle closure. Despite a potential positive impact on anterior chamber morphology, its use in clinical practice in treating people with chronic angle closure is not supported by the results of trials published to date. Given these results, further research into LPIp is unlikely to be worthwhile.

Learning From Those who Learned: A Survey of Fellowship Trained HoLEP Surgeons and Their Current Practice Patterns.

OBJECTIVE: To gain insight from the experience of learning Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), teaching HoLEP, and the current HoLEP practice patterns of fellowship-trained endourologists. METHODS: Surveys were electronically distributed to United States (U.S.) practicing urologists who completed American Endourology fellowships (that included HoLEP) within the past 6 years. Questions focused on HoLEP training and current practice patterns. RESULTS: As of September 2019, 12% (6/49) of U.S. endourology fellowships reported including HoLEP as a component of training. With a 73% response rate (16 of 22), 81% participated in over 20 cases during training, while 50% participated in over 50. A total of 25% independently completed over 50 cases from start to finish. At training completion, most (80%) felt comfortable/somewhat comfortable completing an entire HoLEP independently and managing post-op complications. Seventy-five percent practice HoLEP currently, and 25% teach to trainees. When asked "What is most challenging about HoLEP in current practice?" common responses were: efficiency/profitability concerns, poor reimbursement, educating OR/hospital staff, establishing case volume, minimizing sphincter trauma, and large glands (>200gm). CONCLUSION: With diverse exposure in fellowship, most incorporate HoLEP into their practice after training. Aspects of the procedure remain challenging after several years of experience. Profitability/reimbursement concerns should be further explored to increase HoLEP adoption.

Safe and effective transvenous lead extraction for elderly patients utilizing non-laser and laser tools: a single-center experience in Japan.

Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) for cardiac implantable electric device (CIED) infection is becoming increasingly common, but is believed to be particularly risky in elderly patients. This study aimed to clarify the safety and effectiveness of TLE in the elderly, evaluating the use of both non-laser and laser extraction tools. We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics, device type, indications, procedures, and clinical results in younger (YG; age: 15-79 years; n = 48) and elderly groups (EG; age: ≥ 80 years; n = 27) of patients who underwent percutaneous TLE between April 2014 and December 2019 at our hospital. The average age was 68 and 88 years in the YG and EG, respectively. Indications for TLE were infection in 33 (68.8%) patients and other in 15 (30.6%) patients in the YG, and infection in all 27 (100%) EG patients. Bloodstream infection was detected in 9 and 4 patients in the YG and EG, respectively, with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis being the most common causative pathogen. All TLE procedures were performed under general anesthesia in an operating room with cardiovascular surgeon backup. An excimer laser sheath (76 leads), a laser followed by a mechanical sheath (45 leads), Evolution RL® (17 leads), a mechanical sheath (9 leads), and manual traction (one lead) were employed to extract a total of 148 leads (98 and 50 in the YG and EG, respectively). A mechanical sheath or Evolution RL® was more frequently used in the YG. The respective average implantation durations in the YG and EG were 5.3 and 5.0 years, respectively, which were comparable (p = 0.46). Procedural success rates were identical between the YG and EG (99% vs. 100%, respectively). There was only one procedure-related complication in the entire cohort (cardiac tamponade in a YG patient). Taken together, the success rates of TLE were high in the EG, with no complications, with extraction being the indication for infection in all EG patients. Percutaneous TLE was safe and effective in elderly patients using both non-laser and laser techniques.

Utilization of MOSES Modulated Pulse Mode Results in Improved Efficiency in Holmium:YAG Laser Ablation of the Prostate.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if MOSES technology improves efficiency and short-term outcomes in holmium laser ablation of the prostate (HoLAP). METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent HoLAP between August 2016 and November 2019 was conducted. All procedures before and after the implementation of MOSES technology at our institution were evaluated. Preoperative patient characteristics and intraoperative data were collected. Postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, and postvoid residual measurements at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively were analyzed. RESULTS: This cohort included 65 males who underwent HoLAP, 32 without and 33 with MOSES. Patients in the MOSES group were slightly older, but no other differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. Ablation time was similar at 49.6 ± 26.1 minutes without and 40.7 ± 41.2 minutes with MOSES (P = .38). However, HoLAP with MOSES had significantly higher ablation efficiency (0.59 ± 0.24 g/min without vs 0.86 0.5 g/min with MOSES, P = .01). On multivariable regression modeling, HoLAP without MOSES added 12 minutes to operating time (estimate 12.3, standard error 3.44, P < .01) after controlling for prostate size and laser energy usage. Duration of catheterization, urinary incontinence and need for reoperation within 3 months were similar. There were no differences between groups in International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, or postvoid residual at 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Utilization of MOSES technology resulted in improved efficiency in HoLAP, translating into time savings in the operating room. Postoperative outcomes out to 3 months were similar among patients who underwent the procedure utilizing either laser pulse mode. Further studies are needed to investigate long-term outcomes as the use of MOSES is likely to become more commonly utilized.

Office-Based Procedure Training in Laryngology Fellowship Programs.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the current practices and challenges of training office-based procedures to laryngology fellows in the United States. METHODS: An anonymous web-based survey study was distributed to laryngology fellowship program directors, as listed by the American Laryngological Association. The survey was a 19-item questionnaire with free-text, Likert scale, and multiple-choice answers. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 27 program directors (81.4%) replied to the survey. Many programs (8/16) have three or more laryngologists and do more than 10 procedures each week (10/16). Sixty-nine percent (11/16) of directors had not been trained for office procedures in their fellowship. The fellows are allowed to be primary surgeon on 68.75% and 75% of vocal fold augmentation and laser procedures, respectively. The expected competencies for these procedures on graduation are average-moderate and moderate. When program directors asked about the methods used for training, a minority of them use simulators (2/16), procedural checklists (2/16), or structured debriefing (2/16). The most commonly used methods were case-based troubleshooting (13/16) and unstructured debriefing (13/16). Patients being awake and patients' expectations are seen as the most important obstacles. Most of the directors thought office-based procedure training could be improved (14/16). The most common suggestions were using step-wise checklists, simulator-labs, and formal debriefings. CONCLUSION: This is the first study evaluating the training of office-based laryngeal procedures during laryngology fellowship. Given the increasing importance of these procedures in practice and the herein identified barriers and need for improvement, fellowships should investigate the use of systematic training tools to improve fellow competency with office-based procedures. Laryngoscope, 131:2054-2058, 2021.

Laser Treatment for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for non-melanoma skin cancer. Lasers are an additional option. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to review the literature on the efficacy and safety of lasers for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of laser treatment for non-melanoma skin cancer was performed. The primary outcome was recurrence rate (RR). RESULTS: The review included 32 studies (six randomized controlled trials and 26 cohort studies): 27 evaluated basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), three squamous cell carcinomas, and two both, for a total of 4755 BCCs and 214 squamous cell carcinoas. Most BCCs were low risk. The Nd:YAG laser (seven studies, 3286 BCCs) had a 3.1% RR (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-6.4%) during a mean follow-up of 7.9 years, with a low rate (< 20%) of scarring and dyspigmentation. The CO2 laser (ten studies, 904 BCCs) had a 9.4% RR (95% CI 4.1-20) during a mean follow-up of 2.1 years, with a low rate of side effects. The pulsed dye laser (eight studies, 206 BCCs) had a 38% RR (95% CI 24-55). In two studies, the Nd:YAG laser demonstrated a RR of 10% (95% CI 2-31) for Bowen's disease, and in three studies, the CO2 laser demonstrated a RR of 22% (95% CI 5-61) for squamous cell carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Based on cohort studies, the Nd:YAG laser is a safe and efficacious modality for the treatment of low-risk BCC. Based on settings applied in prior studies in the literature, the CO2 laser is less efficacious than the Nd:YAG laser, thus it cannot be recommended for BCC treatment. Insufficient data preclude conclusions regarding laser treatment for squamous cell carcinoma. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42019129717.

Selective fetal reduction in complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: A comparison of techniques.

OBJECTIVE: To compare perinatal outcomes associated with three methods of selective reduction in complicated monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies: bipolar cord coagulation (BC), fetoscopic or ultrasound guided laser cord occlusion and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of complicated MC twin pregnancies undergoing selective fetal reduction at a tertiary fetal center over a 20-year period. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes were compared. RESULTS: 105 procedures met inclusion criteria: 74 RFAs, 17 lasers and 14 BCs. Procedure duration was significantly shorter for RFA (27.4 ± 15.8 minutes) compared to BC (91.7 ± 38.7 minutes) and laser (83.4 ± 40.4 minutes), P < .0001). The incidence of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) and co-twin demise did not differ between groups, however preterm delivery <34 weeks occurred less frequently following RFA (29.7%), compared to laser (64.7%) or BC (42.9%) (P = .02); delivery <37 weeks was also less frequent following RFA (45.9%), compared to laser (76.5%) or BC (78.6%)(P = .01). The difference in preterm birth<34 weeks between RFA and laser was maintained after adjusting for cord occlusion indication and amnionicity (OR 3.96, 95% CI 1.27-12.31). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, RFA procedures were simpler, faster and associated with a lower risk of preterm delivery <34 and <37 weeks, compared to laser or BC.

Laser Plume From Human Papillomavirus-Infected Tissue: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Laser procedures are becoming more prevalent across multiple medical specialties for a variety of indications. The plumes created by these lasers have raised concern for the dissemination of an infectious material. OBJECTIVE: To review and summarize the information on viral dissemination in laser plumes available in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data Sources A systematic review was performed on English and non-English articles using the PubMed and the Cochrane databases. A manual search of bibliographies from relevant articles was also performed to collect additional studies. STUDY SELECTION: Only articles in the English language with full texts available that pertained to viral particles in laser plumes were included. Data Extraction Two authors performed independent article selections using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: There have been case reports of possible transmission of human papillomavirus (HPV) by inhalation of laser-produced aerosols. Multiple investigators have attempted to recreate this scenario in the laboratory to qualify this risk. Others have conducted clinical experiments to determine the presence of HPV in laser plumes. CONCLUSION: The current body of the literature suggests that laser surgeons are at a risk for HPV exposure by inhalation of laser-derived aerosols. We offer best practice recommendations for laser operators.

Er:YAG laser in hysterectomized women with stress urinary incontinence: a VELA retrospective cohort, non-inferiority study.

Objective: To test whether the erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) SMOOTH® laser treatment efficacy on stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in hysterectomized patients is non-inferior to its efficacy in non-hysterectomized patients.Methods: In this real-world, retrospective cohort study performed in Turkey, Croatia and Italy, we enrolled a consecutive sample of 35 hysterectomized and 34 non-hysterectomized patients with SUI. We used the Er:YAG SMOOTH® laser (Fotona, Slovenia) with a wave length of 2940 nm. The primary outcome was median reduction of SUI symptoms measured by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short-Form (ICIQ-SF) with the non-inferiority margin defined as the minimum clinically important difference of ICIQ-SF (δ < 2.52 points).Results: In hysterectomized patients, the ICIQ-SF was reduced by 5 points (95% confidence interval 3-8; p < 0.001), a reduction of 45% (95% confidence interval 36-67%). After adjustment for baseline ICIQ-SF and five covariates, the reduction of symptoms in the hysterectomized group was not inferior to the reduction in the non-hysterectomized group.Conclusion: The Er:YAG SMOOTH® laser treatment seems to improve the symptoms of SUI in hysterectomized women not clinically relevantly less than in non-hysterectomized women. It seems that the beneficial effect of Er:YAG SMOOTH® laser treatment for SUI in hysterectomized women is time-limited.

Randomised trial of bipolar resection vs holmium laser enucleation vs Greenlight laser vapo-enucleation of the prostate for treatment of large benign prostate obstruction: 3-years outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare transurethral resection in saline (TURIS), Greenlight laser vapo-enucleation of the prostate (GL.PVEP), and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), for controlling lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to assess non-inferiority of 3-year re-treatment rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with BPH (prostate size 80-150 mL) were randomly assigned to one of the intervention groups. Non-inferiority of re-treatment rate was evaluated using a one-sided test at 5% level of significance. RESULTS: At the time of analysis, 60 GL.PVEP, 60 HoLEP and 62 TURIS procedures were included. Perioperative parameters were comparable between groups; however, the operative time was longer in GL.PVEP vs HoLEP and TURIS, at a mean (SD) of 92 (32) vs 73 (30) and 83 (28) min (P = 0.005); and was less effective with a mean (SD) removal of 1.2 (0.4) vs 1.7 (0.7) and 1.4 (0.6) g/min (P < 0.001), respectively. Perioperative complications and need for auxiliary procedures were similar in the three groups; however, there was a significantly higher rate of capsular perforation in TURIS group (five, 8%) compared to one (1.6%) in the GL.PVEP group and none in the HoLEP group (P = 0.01). There was a significantly longer hospital stay, catheter-time and higher rate of blood transfusion in the TURIS group. There was significant but comparable improvements in the International Prostate Symptom Score in three groups at different follow-up points. At 3 years, re-treatment for recurrent bladder outlet obstruction was required more after GL.PVEP and TURIS. More re-do surgeries for recurrent obstructing prostate adenoma was reported after GL.PVEP (four, 6.7%) and TURIS (six, 9.7%) than for HoLEP (none) (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The perioperative outcomes of GL.PVEP and HoLEP surpassed that of TURIS for the treatment of large prostates, but with a significantly prolonged operative time with GL.PVEP. The three techniques achieve good functional outcomes; however, 3-year re-treatment rates following TURIS and GL.PVEP were inferior to HoLEP.

The cost-effectiveness of transurethral resection of the prostate vs thulium laser transurethral vaporesection of the prostate in the UNBLOCS randomised controlled trial for benign prostatic obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of the current 'gold standard' operation of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) compared to the new laser technique of thulium laser transurethral vaporesection of the prostate (ThuVARP) in men with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) within the UK National Health Service (NHS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The trial was conducted across seven UK centres (four university teaching hospitals and three district general hospitals). A total of 410 men aged ≥18 years presenting with either bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urinary retention secondary to BPO, and suitable for surgery, were randomised (whilst under anaesthetic) 1:1 to receive the TURP or ThuVARP procedure. Resource use in relation to the operation, initial inpatient stay, and subsequent use of NHS services was collected for 12 months from randomisation (equivalent to primary effectiveness outcome) using hospital records and patient questionnaires. Resources were valued using UK reference costs. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated from the EuroQoL five Dimensions five Levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire completed at baseline, 3- and 12-months. Total adjusted mean costs, QALYs and incremental Net Monetary Benefit statistics were calculated: cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and sensitivity analyses addressed uncertainty. RESULTS: The total adjusted mean secondary care cost over the 12 months in the TURP arm (£4244) was £9 (95% CI -£376, £359) lower than the ThuVARP arm (£4253). The ThuVARP operation took on average 21 min longer than TURP. The adjusted mean difference of QALYs (0.01 favouring TURP, 95% CI -0.01, 0.04) was similar between the arms. There is a 76% probability that TURP is the cost-effective option compared with ThuVARP at the £20 000 per QALY willingness to pay threshold used by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). CONCLUSION: One of the anticipated benefits of the laser surgery, reduced length of hospital stay with an associated reduction in cost, did not materialise within the study. The longer duration of the ThuVARP procedure is important to consider, both from a patient perspective in terms of increased time under anaesthetic, and from a service delivery perspective. TURP remains a highly cost-effective treatment for men with BPO.

Neurodevelopmental impairment at 3 years of age after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Data on neurodevelopmental outcomes of children surviving after fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS) for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) are scarce. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated children surviving after FLS for TTTS at 16 to 26 weeks' gestation between 2003 and 2014. Children were evaluated by standardized neurologic examinations using the Kyoto Scale 2001 at a corrected age of 3 years ± 6 months. Neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) was defined as cerebral palsy (CP), bilateral blindness, bilateral deafness or a developmental quotient (DQ) < 70 points. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at term-equivalent age. RESULTS: A total of 188 children from 110 twin pregnancies were evaluated. NDI was detected in 16/188 (8.5%) children, including six cases of CP (3.2%). No children had bilateral blindness or deafness. An earlier gestational age at delivery was associated with a higher incidence of NDI (P < .001). Abnormal brain MRI findings were detected in 9/16 (56%) of children with NDI, including 6/6 (100%) with CP. CONCLUSION: The incidence of NDI in children following FLS at 3 years old was 8.5%. Prematurity is a strong risk factor for NDI. Brain MRI may predict the development of CP.

Intrafetal laser for midtrimester TRAP sequence-experience from a single center.

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience and evaluate outcomes in monochorionic pregnancies with Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion sequence with intrafetal laser therapy. METHODS: Retrospective review of records of all pregnancies with TRAP sequence treated by intrafetal laser therapy between 2011 January and 2015 December that were retrieved and analysed. RESULTS: Electronic search of the scan database retrieved 57 cases of TRAP sequence during the study period, 7 triplets and 50 monochorionic twins. Intrafetal laser was done in 27 cases, 22 cases of twins and 5 cases of triplets. In the twins group, median gestational age at intervention was 22.5 weeks, the earliest done at 16.3 weeks. The median gestational age at delivery and birth weight was 37 weeks and 2.5 Kgs. The median procedure and delivery interval was 14 weeks. Live birth rate was 17/22 (77%) the pump survival rate was 16/22 (73%). Pregnancies with non-surviving pump were 5 in numbers (5/22). A repeat procedure was warranted in one case. In the triplet group, median gestational age at intervention, delivery and procedure delivery interval was 18, 35 and 17 weeks. CONCLUSION: Intrafetal laser is simple, effective and the treatment of choice to interrupt the vascular supply to acardiac twin.