Intraocular pressure modulation with thermal stimuli.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine whether early-stage intraocular pressure can be modulated using a thermal face mask. METHODS: In this prospective clinical study, healthy participants were randomized on a 1:1:1 allocation ratio to three mask groups: hypothermic (G1), normothermic (G2), and hyperthermic (G3). After randomization, 108 eyes from 108 participants were submitted to clinical evaluations, including measurement of initial intraocular pressure (T1). The thermal mask was then applied for 10 minutes, followed by a second evaluation of intraocular pressure (T2) and assessment of any side effects. RESULTS: The hypothermic group (G1) showed a significant reduction in mean intraocular pressure between T1 (16.97 ± 2.59 mmHg) and T2 (14.97 ± 2.44 mmHg) (p<0.001). G2 showed no significant pressure difference between T1 (16.50 ± 2.55 mmHg) and T2 (17.00 ± 2.29 mmHg) (p=0.054). G3 showed a significant increase in pressure from T1 (16.53 ± 2.69 mmHg) to T2 (18.58 ± 2.95 mmHg) (p<0.001). At T1, there was no difference between the three study groups (p=0.823), but at T2, the mean values of G3 were significantly higher than those of G1 and G2 (p<0.00). CONCLUSION: Temperature was shown to significantly modify intraocular pressure. Thermal masks allow the application of temperature in a controlled, reproducible manner. Further studies are needed to assess the duration of these effects and whether they are reproducible in patients with pathologies that affect intraocular pressure.

Glaucoma Home Self-Testing Using VR Visual Fields and Rebound Tonometry Versus In-Clinic Perimetry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: A Pilot Study.

Purpose: This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility, accuracy, and repeatability of unsupervised, at-home, multi-day glaucoma testing using the Olleyes VisuALL Virtual Reality Platform (VRP) and the iCare HOME handheld self-tonometer. Methods: Participants were trained to use two U.S. Food and Drug Administration-registered or approved devices before conducting self-tests at home over 3 consecutive days. The iCare HOME intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements were collected four times daily per eye, and VRP visual field tests were performed once daily. The results were compared with one in-clinic Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) visual field test performed on the day of device training, iCare HOME measurements by the trainer, and the last five Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) results. Results: Of 15 enrolled participants, nine of them (60%) completed the study. The six excluded participants could not self-measure using iCare HOME. There was significant correlation between the average mean deviation (MD) values of the at-home VRP tests and in-clinic HFA test (r2 = 0.8793, P < 0.001). Additionally, the average of the sensitivities in five of six Garway-Heath sectors were significantly correlated. VRP test duration was also shorter than in-clinic HFA testing (P < 0.001). Finally, at-home tonometry yielded statistically similar values compared to trainer-obtained iCare HOME values. The mean and range of at-home tonometry were also statistically similar to those for in-clinic GAT, but at-home tonometry demonstrated higher maximum IOP values (P = 0.0429). Conclusions: Unsupervised, at-home, multi-day glaucoma testing using two devices resulted in the capture of higher maximum IOPs than in the clinic and good MD correlation of VRP with HFA. However, 40% of participants could not self-measure IOP using iCare HOME. Translational Relevance: The study findings suggest that at-home remote glaucoma monitoring correlates with in-office testing and could provide additional information for glaucoma management, although patients had more difficulty with the iCare HOME than the VRP.

Accuracy of a novel method for IOP measurement without applying pressure on the cornea.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of a prototype novel instrument for intra ocular pressure (IOP) measurements not involving corneal pressure application. DESIGN: Prospective case control study. METHODS: An institutional study including 16 healthy volunteers without ocular pathology. IOP in both eyes of the participants was measured four times in different body positions with the novel prototype and reference instrument (Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) or iCare (iCare Finland OY, Vantaa, Finland)). IOP results were compared between the prototype and the reference instruments in 116 pairs of measurement. RESULTS: Overall no statistically significant difference was found between the presented prototype and the reference instrument. Stratifying measurements by instrument used revealed no significant difference for GAT and statistical significant (yet clinically insignificant) difference for iCare. CONCLUSIONS: The presented prototype demonstrates good clinical agreement of IOP measuring results with reference instruments Further large-scale studies assessing this instrument in glaucoma patients are warranted.

A Novel Implantable Piezoresistive Microsensor for Intraocular Pressure Measurement.

Glaucoma is the world's second-leading irreversible eye disease causing blindness. Although the pathogenesis of glaucoma is not particularly well understood, high intraocular pressure (IOP) is widely recognized as a significant risk factor. In clinical practice, various devices have been used to measure IOP, but most of them cannot provide continuous measurements for a long time. To meet the needs of glaucoma patients who experience frequent fluctuations in the IOP and require constant monitoring, we fabricated an implantable piezoresistive IOP sensor based on microfluidic technology. The sensor has a sensitivity of 0.00257 Ω/mbar and demonstrates excellent linearity, stability, and repeatability. According to the calibration data, the average measurement error is ±0.5 mbar. We implanted it into the vitreous of a rabbit and successfully detected its IOP fluctuations. The sensor is simple in design, easy to fabricate, and can be used for long-term continuous IOP measurements. It presents a new approach for microfluidic-based IOP sensors and offers a novel method for the daily care of patients with glaucoma.

Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the tono-pen, goldmann applanation tonometer, and noncontact tonometer in nonglaucomatous pseudophakic children.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the agreement between the Goldman applanation tonometer (GAT), Tono-Pen, and noncontact tonometer (NCT) in the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in pseudophakic children. METHODS: The medical records of nonglaucomatous pseudophakic children between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 46 eyes of 23 patients operated for bilateral pediatric cataract were included in the study. The patients' mean age was 13.4 ± 4.1 years. Central corneal thickness (CCT) and IOP values measured with the GAT, Tono-Pen, and NCT were recorded. Agreement between the tonometers was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The mean IOP of the 46 eyes included in the study was measured as 13.7 ± 2.3 mm Hg with the GAT, 16.0 ± 2.3 mm Hg with NCT, and 16.5 ± 2.3 mm Hg with the Tono-Pen (p < 0.001). There is no statistical difference between NCT and Tono-Pen measurements, while GAT measurements were significantly lower than those of the NCT and Tono-pen. ICC values showed fair agreement between NCT and Tono-Pen (ICC = 0.720), whereas there was poor agreement between GAT and NCT (ICC = 0.501) and Tono-pen (ICC = 0.314). CONCLUSIONS: With all devices included in the study, thicker corneas were associated with higher IOP measurements. Although there was moderate agreement between the NCT and Tono-Pen, there was a statistically significant difference in the IOP values provided by the three devices. Our results suggest these devices should not be used interchangeably.

Comparing the intraocular pressure values obtained with a rebound tonometer (TONOVET Plus) and an indentation tonometer (IOPvet) in dogs with and without ocular disease.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) values obtained from two groups of dogs using the IOPvet indentation tonometer to those obtained from the same dogs using an established rebound tonometer (TONOVET Plus). METHODS: Tonometry was performed on 36 dogs with ocular diseases (70 eyes; group A) and 25 healthy dogs (49 eyes; group B). First, the TONOVET Plus rebound tonometer was used. Then, one drop of oxybuprocaine hydrochloride was applied to each eye, and 1 minute later, the IOP was estimated using the IOPvet. RESULTS: The IOPvet was safe, well tolerated and easy to use. The instrument had a high specificity (98.5%) for identifying IOPs of 20 mmHg or less. A lack of sensitivity (67.9%) was noted when evaluating eyes with an IOP between 20 and 30 mmHg. The sensitivity (33.3%) for identifying canine eyes with an IOP of greater than 30 mmHg (n = 24) was low. LIMITATIONS: This study lacks manometric work, which would be hard to justify with client-owned dogs. Quantitative numerical data were compared with qualitative values and the same investigator obtained readings using both tonometers without being masked. CONCLUSIONS: The IOPvet is highly sensitive for assessing normal IOPs, but underestimation of higher IOPs can lead to poor diagnostics. Digital tonometers remain the best way to assess IOP in veterinary clinics.

A comparison of iCare and Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate factors associated with differences in intraocular pressure (IOP) readings between iCare and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in established glaucoma patients. METHODS: This retrospective comparative study included clinical data of 350 eyes from 350 established glaucoma patients who had iCare and GAT IOP measured by an ophthalmic technician and a glaucoma specialist, respectively. The main outcome measure was the difference in IOP measurements of the right eyes with iCare and GAT. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between GAT and iCare was 0.90. The mean IOP difference between tonometers was - 0.18 ± 2.89 mmHg. Bland-Altman plots indicated a 95% limit of agreement of - 5.8 to 5.5 mmHg. Central corneal thickness (CCT) and age were significantly correlated with the difference in IOPs of the iCare and GAT. GAT-IOP and age were significantly associated with the absolute difference in measured IOP of the two tonometers. The difference in measurements was not significantly associated with prior glaucoma surgery, average global index of optical coherence tomography, axial length, technician years of experience and certification, and IOP range. CONCLUSION: Although there is good agreement between the iCare and GAT mean values, these devices are not interchangeable in glaucoma patients due to the wide range of the limit of agreement.

Agreement of tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in Wistar rats: a systematic review.

Glaucoma is the most common cause of irreversible blindness in the world. It is associated with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Fluctuations in tonometer readings have implications for glaucoma research, where accurate IOP measurements are vital for evaluating disease progression and treatment efficacy. Researchers should carefully select the appropriate tonometer and consider biases associated with different tonometers. Validation against standard measurements can improve IOP measurement accuracy in rat models. In conclusion, this systematic review will emphasize on the importance of selecting the appropriate tonometer for IOP measurement in rat models, considering potential biases and their implications for glaucoma research. Accurate and consistent IOP measurement in rat models is crucial for understanding glaucoma pathophysiology and developing effective treatments. This systematic review aims to assess agreement among tonometers used for measuring IOP in Wistar rat models primarily focusing on TonoLab, TonoVet, and Tono-pen. The review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Two articles were included for qualitative synthesis. The studies compared manometric IOP with TonoLab, rebound tonometer, and Tono-pen XL readings. It was observed that TonoLab consistently underestimated IOP, while Tono-pen XL tended to overestimate IOP compared to manometric measurements. The study's findings will help researchers in making decisions about tonometer selection, leading to more reliable outcomes in glaucoma research using rat models. Further research, specifically RCT's (randomized controlled trial) is needed to confirm the results and enhance IOP measurement precision in rat models.

Evaluation of a new transpalpebral tonometer for self-measuring intraocular pressure.

PURPOSE: We developed a novel transpalpebral self-tonometer called the TapEye tonometer (TET) based on palpation of the upper eyelid. Our goal was to evaluate a method for improving the accuracy of measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) through the eyelid. METHODS: Participants underwent standardized training by technicians and were required to be able to use the TET for study inclusion. Subsequently, a noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) were used. All participants were instructed to measure their IOPs using the three tonometers at baseline (visit 1) and at 1 month (visit 2). At visit 2, the corrected IOP value measured by the TET (c-TET) was calculated using the difference between the TET and GAT measurements obtained at visit 1. RESULTS: No significant correlations were found between the TET and GAT measurements at any visit, but the correlation between the c-TET and GAT measurements at visit 2 was significant. The mean difference between the c-TET and GAT measurements was 0.4 ± 3.7 mmHg in the right eye and 0.5 ± 3.4 mmHg in the left eye. CONCLUSIONS: After correcting the IOP based on the difference between the TET and GAT measurements at the initial visit, the corrected IOP value of the TET was correlated with that of the GAT at the second visit. The TET has the potential to address an unmet need by providing a tool for minimally invasive IOP measurements. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration number: jRCTs032220268.

Intraocular Pressure Before and After Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Prospective Comparison of Corvis ST and Ocular Response Analyzer.

PRCIS: The study showed that Corvis ST's biomechanical intraocular pressure (bIOP) and ocular response analyzer's (ORA) cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) do not agree well, before or after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and may not be used interchangeably. bIOP remained unchanged after PRK. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement between the biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) measured by the Corvis ST and the IOPcc measured by the ORA before and after PRK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective interventional study, a total of 53 patients (53 eyes) were included. Measurements were acquired using both the Corvis ST and ORA devices before and 3 months post-PRK. The agreement between the 2 devices was evaluated using limits of agreement (LoA) and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The participants had a mean age of 29.6 ± 5.21 years (range: 21 to 40), with 41 (77.4%) of them being females. After the surgery, the average change in intraocular pressure (IOP) was 0.3 ± 1.7 mm Hg for bIOP and -1.6 ± 4.0 mm Hg for IOPcc. The corresponding 95% LoA were -3.5 to 4.2 mm Hg and -9.5 to 6.3 mm Hg, respectively. The 95% LoA between bIOP and IOPcc after PRK was -2.3 to 8.5 mm Hg. Notably, the bIOP values were higher for IOPs <20 mm Hg and lower for IOPs >20 mm Hg compared with IOPcc. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate a weak agreement between the Corvis ST-bIOP and the ORA-IOPcc both before and after PRK. These devices may not be used interchangeably for IOP measurement. bIOP exhibited less variation compared with the IOPcc, suggesting that the bIOP may be a better option for IOP reading after PRK.

Test-Retest Reliability of Intraocular Pressure Measurements With Office-Based Versus Home-Based Rebound Tonometers.

PRCIS: Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the HOME2 rebound tonometer are interchangeable with measurements obtained using the office-based IC100 and IC200 rebound tonometers, making characterization of circadian IOP achievable with no inter-device sources of variability. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate test-retest reliability between IOP measurements obtained with a home rebound tonometer operated by patients and those obtained with office rebound tonometers operated by experienced clinical staff. METHODS: After training and practice with a home rebound tonometer (iCare HOME2) in a randomly selected eye, patients with established or suspected open angle glaucoma underwent IOP measurement in the fellow eye as follows in randomized order: 3 good quality measurements with the iCare IC100 operated by experienced clinical staff, 3 good quality measurements with the iCare IC200 operated by experienced clinical staff, and 3 good quality measurements with the HOME2 operated by the patient. The Shrout-Fleisch intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; 2,1) was the measure of reliability utilized based on the model using 2-way random effects, absolute agreement, and single measurement. RESULTS: Thirty eyes of 30 patients were evaluated. The Pearson correlation coefficient ( r ) for IOP measurements taken with the IC100 and HOME2 was 0.97, with the IC200 and HOME2 was 0.96, and with the IC100 and IC200 was 0.97. Test-retest reliability between HOME2 and IC100 (ICC: 0.90), HOME2 and IC200 (ICC: 0.92), and IC100 and IC200 (ICC: 0.94) all reflected excellent test-retest reliability. CONCLUSION: The test-retest reliability of IOP measurements taken by patients using the iCare HOME2 self-tonometer compared with IOP measurements taken by trained operators using the iCare IC100 and IC200 tonometers was uniformly excellent (ICCs all ≥0.9). These findings indicate that these three devices should be considered interchangeable for the clinical assessment of circadian IOP.

Comparison of first, second, and third versus the average of six probe-corneal touches for intraocular measurement of two rebound tonometers in healthy horses.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained from first, second, and third probe-cornea touch (PCT) and compare them with the average of six PCTs using two rebound tonometers in horses. This study enrolled a total of thirty-eight stallions, comprising of 24 Arabian horses and 14 cross-breeds (with an average age of 8 ± 3 years). The IOP measurements of first, second, and third, as well as the average of six PCTs were obtained using either Tonovet (TV) or Tonovet Plus (TV+) rebound tonometers. The mean differences (95% limits of agreement) between the average of six PCTs and the first, second, and third PCTs were 0.1 (-4.8 to 5), 0.2 (-4.8 to 4.5), and 0.2 (-3.6 to 4.0) mmHg with TV, respectively. With TV+, the differences were 0.3 (-6.6 to 7.2), 1.1 (-8.6 to 10.8), and -0.2 (-3.6 to 4.0) mmHg, respectively. Compared to the average of six PCTs, only 89.5%, 92.1%, and 97.4% of IOP measurements obtained from TV and 78.9%, 73.3%, and 65.8% of IOP measurements obtained from TV+ were within 4 mmHg of the average of six PCTs for first, second, and third PCTs, respectively. In conclusion, the measurement of IOP in the first PCT achieved best agreement with the IOP measurement of six average PCTs. Therefore, the first PCT could be considered as an alternative option for measuring IOP in horses when obtaining an average of six PCTs is not feasible.

A new mouse-fixation device for IOP measurement in awake mice.

Glaucoma is an irreversible blinding eye disease. The mechanisms underlying glaucoma are complex. Up to now, no successful remedy has been found to completely cure the condition. High intraocular pressure (IOP) is an established risk factor for glaucoma and the only known modifiable factor for glaucoma treatment. Mice have been widely used to study glaucoma pathogenesis. IOP measurement is an important tool for monitoring the potential development of glaucomatous phenotypes in glaucoma mouse models. Currently, there are two methods of IOP measurement in mice: invasive and non-invasive. As the invasive method can cause corneal damage and inflammation, and most of the noninvasive method involves the use of anesthetics. In the course of our research, we designed a mouse fixation device to facilitate non-invasive measurements of mouse IOPs. Using this device, mouse IOPs can be accurately measured in awake mice. This device will help researchers to accurately assess mouse IOP without the use of anesthetics.

The Effect of Yoga on Intraocular Pressure Using the "iCare HOME2" Tonometer.

BACKGROUND: Various yoga positions may have an unfavorable impact on intraocular pressure (IOP) and may therefore be seen as a potential risk factor for the progression of glaucoma. The new "iCare HOME2" is a handheld self-tonometer for IOP measurements outside clinical settings. This is the first study to evaluate the immediate effect of common yoga postures on the IOP of healthy and glaucomatous eyes using the "iCare HOME2" self-tonometer and to compare the time of IOP recovery in both groups. METHODS: This is a single-center, prospective, observational study including 25 healthy and 25 glaucoma patients performing the following yoga positions: "legs up" (Viparita Karani), "bend over" (Uttanasana), "plough pose" (Halasana), and the "down face dog" (Adho Mukha Svanasana) for 90 s each, with a 2-min break in between. IOP was measured with the "iCare HOME2" before, during, and after each position. RESULTS: IOP significantly increased in all eyes in all positions (p < 0.05), showing no statistically significant difference between healthy or glaucomatous eyes (p > 0.05). The mean rise in IOP in healthy subjects was 1.6 mmHg (SD 1.42; p = 0.037), 14.4 mmHg (SD 4.48; p < 0.001), 7.5 mmHg (SD 4.21; p < 0.001), and 16.5 mmHg (SD 3.71; p < 0.001), whereas in glaucoma patients, IOP rose by 2.8 mmHg (SD 2.8; p = 0.017), 11.6 mmHg (SD 3.86; p < 0.001), 6.0 mmHg (SD 2.24; p < 0.001), and 15.1 mmHg (SD 4.44; p < 0.001) during the above listed yoga positions, repsectively. The highest increase in IOP was seen in the down face position, reaching mean IOP values above 31 mmHg in both study groups. IOP elevation was observed immediately after assuming the yoga position, with no significant change during the following 90 s of holding each pose (p > 0.05). All IOP values returned to baseline level in all individuals, with no significant difference between healthy and glaucoma participants. CONCLUSION: Our data show that common yoga positions can lead to an acute IOP elevation of up to 31 mmHg in healthy as well as glaucoma eyes, with higher IOP values during head-down positions. Given that IOP peaks are a major risk factor for glaucomatous optic neuropathy, we generally advise glaucoma patients to carefully choose their yoga exercises. If and to what extent practicing yoga leads to glaucoma progression, however, remains unclear and warrants further research.

Validation of the Reichert® Tono-Vera® Vet rebound tonometer in normal ex vivo canine eyes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the Reichert® Tono-Vera® Vet rebound tonometer for canine intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. ANIMALS STUDIED: Five normal canine ex vivo globes. PROCEDURES: The anterior chambers of five freshly enucleated normal canine eyes were cannulated and connected to a reservoir of Plasma-Lyte A and a manometer. Starting at a manometric IOP of 5 mmHg, the pressure was progressively increased to 80 mmHg by raising the reservoir. Triplicate IOP measurements were taken with the Tono-Vera® Vet from the central cornea using the dog setting and compared to the manometric pressure by linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: There was a strong positive linear regression trend when comparing central corneal Tono-Vera® Vet IOPs to manometric pressures (r2 = .99) with solid agreement between the two methods. Compared to manometric IOPs, the Tono-Vera® Vet underestimated IOPs at higher pressures ≥70 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of IOPs from the central cornea with the Tono-Vera® Vet provided accurate results over a large range in normal canine globes compared to direct manometry. The mild to moderate underestimation of IOPs at high pressures was not considered clinically relevant.

A Comparative Analysis of Intraocular Pressure Measurement Accuracy With Reused iCare Probes.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of reused iCare probes after disinfection with 70% isopropyl alcohol and ethylene oxide gas compared to new iCare probes and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). DESIGN: Prospective comparative analysis. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 118 eyes from 59 patients recruited from the Aravind Eye Hospital glaucoma clinic in Tirupati, South India. METHODS: Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured on each eye using a new iCare tonometer probe, an iCare probe previously used and disinfected 1 time prior (once used probe) and 5 times prior (multiply used probe), as well as with GAT. Probes were disinfected after each use with 70% isopropyl alcohol swabs and ethylene oxide sterilization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement demonstrated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), mean difference in IOP values with limits of agreement, and Bland-Altman plots among IOP measurement approaches. RESULTS: Compared to new iCare probes, both once used probes (ICC = 0.989, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.985-0.993) and multiply used probes (ICC = 0.989, 95% CI 0.984-0.992) showed excellent agreement, and the mean difference in IOP was minimal for both once used probes (0.70 mmHg, 95% CI 0.29-1.11) and multiply used probes (0.75 mmHg, 95% CI 0.66-0.82) compared to new probes. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated minimal differences between new and reused probes across the spectrum of IOP. When comparing multiply used probes to once used probes, there was a high level of agreement (0.993) (95% CI 0.990-0.995) and negligible mean IOP difference 0.04 mmHg (95% CI 0.32-0.40). Additionally, ICC values for new probes (0.966, 95% CI 0.951-0.976), once used probes (0.958, 95% CI 0.940-0.971), and multiply used probes (0.957, 95% CI 0.938-0.970) compared to GAT were similar and all showed excellent agreement. Both new and reused iCare probes underestimated IOP by 2 to 3 mmHg compared to GAT. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective comparative analysis, we found that reusing iCare probes up to 5 times does not compromise the accuracy of IOP measurements when disinfected with 70% isopropyl alcohol swabs and ethylene oxide. Reusing iCare probes has the potential to transform care by reducing cost, decreasing environmental waste, and allowing for glaucoma screening camps and increased glaucoma monitoring in low resource settings leading to earlier identification and treatment of glaucoma. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Comparison of intraocular pressure in New Zealand White rabbits measured using rebound and applanation tonometers and four different methods of physical restraint.

AIMS: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained in rabbits using rebound (TV) and applanation (TPV) tonometers with four different methods of physical restraint. METHODS: A total of 20 New Zealand White rabbits (40 eyes) were included in this study. IOP readings were obtained from both eyes using the two different tonometers. The rabbits were placed on a table and restrained by wrapping in a cloth (Method I), by scruffing with rear support (Method II), by wrapping in a cloth and cupped in the hands (Method III), or by a box restrainer (Method IV). RESULTS: The mean IOP measurement obtained by TPV was higher than that obtained with the TV for all handling methods. Mean differences (TV-TPV, in mmHg) in IOP were -5.3 (95% Cl = -6.5 to -4.1) for Method 1, -4.7 (95% Cl = -6.2 to -3.29) for Method II, -4.9 (95% Cl = -6.2 to -3.7) for Method III and -7.6 (95% Cl = -9.2 to -5.9) for Method IV. Using the TV tonometer, mean IOP for Method IV was higher than for Method I (mean difference 2.1 (95% Cl = 1.1-3.1)), whereas using the TPV tonometer, mean IOP for Method IV was significantly higher than Method I, II, and III (mean differences: 4.4 (95% Cl = 2.6-5.9), 3.7 (95% Cl = 2-5.3) and 3.8 (95% Cl = 2-5.4), respectively). According to Bland-Altman plots, IOP readings for TPV tended to be higher than those for TV with all handling methods, but with a lack of agreement. The mean difference and 95% limits of agreement for the differences between TV and TPV were -5.4 mmHg (-12.5-1.9 mmHg), -4.7 mmHg (-12.9-3.5 mmHg), -4.9 mmHg (-12-2.2 mmHg), and -7.5 mmHg (-17.4-2.3 mmHg), with Methods I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Comparing TV and TPV, only 7.5%, 12.5%, 27.5%, and 15% of IOP measurements from 20 rabbits were within the range considered clinically acceptable for IOP (± 2 mmHg) for Method I, II, III, and IV, respectively. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In conclusion, the physical restraint method should be recorded when IOP is measured in rabbits, and TV and TPV tonometers cannot be used interchangeably (high bias and low proportion of measurements within ± 2 mmHg).

Performance of home-based self-tonometry (iCare HOME (TA022)) for measuring intraocular pressure among healthy and glaucoma patients.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare iCare HOME (TA022) with Goldmann applanation tonometer and to evaluate the self-tonometry measurements among the Indian population. Methods: Eligible patients underwent iCare HOME training through guided demonstration (verbal, pictorial, video) and practised self-tonometry measures using iCare HOME. Certification for independent iCare HOME measure was provided if first iCare HOME intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement fell within ± 5 mmHg of Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) measurement which was measured by the trained clinician (principal investigator). Certified participants underwent simulated home self-tonometry measurements using iCare HOME, and agreement with GAT IOP measurements was assessed. Results: Seven of 83 participants (8.43%) failed to complete the study due to difficulty in performing the task, leading to non-certification. Patients who could use the iCare HOME had a mean age of 53 ± 15.55years (53% males; 46% females). Only one in 12 subjects did not qualify to use iCare HOME. The overall mean difference between iCare HOME and GAT was 0.83 mmHg (95%, 3.92 and -2.25). At various pressure ranges, 7-16 mmHg, 17-23 mmHg and >23 mmHg, the mean difference between iCare HOME and GAT was 1.22 mmHg (95%, 4.32 and -1.86), 0.77 mmHg (95%,3.69 and -2.19), -0.11 mmHg (95%, 2.52 and -2.74) respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficient of the iCare HOME device was 0.997(95% CI,0.995-0.998). Conclusions: Patients were able to perform self- tonometry using iCare HOME with good reliability and safety. iCare HOME can be used to address the issue of difficulty in acquiring frequent and diurnal IOP measurements by patients doing self-tonometry from home.

Corneal biomechanics and glaucoma beyond the bidirectional impact of intraocular pressure and corneal deformation response / Biomecânica corneana e glaucoma além do impacto bididirecional da pressão intraocular e da resposta da deformação corneana

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to highlight the impact of biomechanical corneal response in available in vivo tonometry methods for glaucoma management. Systematic review of non-contact air-puff tonometers that analyzes the corneal deformation response, with special focus on the investigation of the correlation of derived parameters with intraocular pressure measurements. The two actual and commercially available in vivo corneal tonometers provide promising information about biomechanical characteristics of the cornea and its relation to glaucoma, allowing the development of new protocols to evaluate, diagnose, and manage this disease.

RESUMO O objetivo deste estudo é destacar o impacto da resposta biomecânica corneana em métodos de tonometria in vivo disponíveis para o manejo do glaucoma. Trata-se de revisão sistemática de tonômetros de ar que analisa a resposta à deformação corneana, com foco especial na investigação da correlação dos parâmetros derivados com as medições da pressão intraocular. Os dois tonômetros mais recentes e comercialmente disponíveis fornecem informações promissoras sobre as características biomecânicas da córnea e sua relação com o glaucoma, permitindo o desenvolvimento de novos protocolos para avaliar, diagnosticar e controlar a doença.

Acupuncture treatment of glaucoma based on radar plots: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is the second most blinding eye disease in the world. Currently, lowering the intraocular pressure through various methods is the main treatment of glaucoma. Acupuncture has been effectively and safely used in the treatment of glaucoma. However, the evidence for the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of glaucoma is controversial, leading to inconsistent findings from systematic evaluations at abroad and home. Therefore, this protocol aims to provide a multivariate evaluation on the quality of evidences from current systematic reviews (SRs) and/or meta-analyzes (MAs) of acupuncture in the treatment of glaucoma, and literature quality, thus providing an intuitive and reliable evidence synthesis and basis for clinical decision making. METHODS: MAs/SRs about the acupuncture treatment of glaucoma will be searched online, including Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Database (WF), Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. Two investigators will independently screen literatures according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and extract data. A multivariate evaluation of the included literature will be performed by depicting radar plots in 6 aspects as follows: Year of publication, study type, SRs assessment through the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2), literature quality assessment through the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA), homogeneity, and publication bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation evidence quality assessment tool will be used to grade and evaluate the quality of outcome indicators of the included literatures. RESULTS: This study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: We would like to provide a visual and scientific approach for clinical decision making of acupuncture treatment of glaucoma through a accessible and useful assessment of systematic reviews.