RESUMEN
Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) recently gained popularity as a treatment for femur neck fracture (FNF), but there have been few studies comparing this with multiple screw fixation (MSF) in the elderly population. The purpose of this study is to compare (1) surgery-related parameters, (2) reoperation rate as a local complication, (3) in-hospital systemic complication rate, and (4) mortality rate at 1 year after MSF and cementless BHA in patients with FNF using nationwide data. Six-hundred sixty-six hips (aged ≥ 50 years) extracted from nationwide Hip Fracture Registry were included in this study (133 MSF and 533 cementless BHA). One hundred fifty-six hips were divided into nondisplaced FNF (Group A) and 510 into displaced FNF (Group B). We evaluated (1) surgery-related parameters (anesthesia type, time to surgery, operation time, estimated blood loss and volume of postoperative transfusion), (2) the rate of and reasons for reoperation, (3) the rate and type of in-hospital systemic complications and (4) one-year mortality rate after surgery. In Group A, MSF showed shorter operation time (p = 0.004) and lower incidence of in-hospital systemic complications (p = 0.003). In Group B, cementless BHA demonstrated lower reoperation rate than MSF (p < 0.001). In both Group A and B, cementless BHA was associated with higher estimated blood loss than MSF (p < 0.001). Based on findings in our study, MSF might be a more favorable option for nondisplaced FNF, whereas cementless BHA might be a better one for displaced FNF in patients older than fifty. Nevertheless, our nationwide study also showed that numbers of cementless BHAs were being performed for nondisplaced FNF even in teaching hospitals.
Asunto(s)
Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Hemiartroplastia/métodos , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Huesos Pélvicos/cirugía , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/patología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fracturas de Cadera/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Huesos Pélvicos/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The purpose of this study is to compare the cut-out rate and sliding distance associated with limb length inequality between operations using a standard non-sliding lag screw versus those using a non-sliding lag screw with U-blade (RC) in the Gamma3 nail. This is a retrospective review of two case series involving different lag screws for the Gamma3 nail. Propensity score matching analysis was used to adjust the confounding factors. A comparative analysis of 304 patients who treated with Gamma3 nail with either a standard non-sliding lag screw or a U-Blade (RC) lag screw was performed. Between 2014 and 2018, 152 patients were treated with U-blade (RC) lag screws, and these patients were matched with those treated with standard lag screws. There was no significant difference in cut-out rate between groups. However, additional use of anti-rotation U-blade (RC) could significantly decrease lag screw sliding, with the group treated with U-Blade (RC) lag screws exhibiting shorter sliding, especially in AO/OTA31 A2 and A3 fractures. Also, in A2 and A3 fractures, the mean lag screw sliding distance was greater than that seen in A1 fractures in both groups. These findings can help trauma surgeons choose the proper implant to reduce leg length inequality.
Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Diseño de Prótesis/instrumentación , Recuperación de la Función , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fracturas de Cadera/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rotación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A subgroup of pertrochanteric fractures-namely, the AO/OTA 31A3 fracture-continues to be a difficult problem to treat, even with cephalomedullary nails. We present the results for 26 patients with a 31A3 fracture treated with the angled blade plate. METHODS: The records of 26 consecutive patients with a 31A3 fracture that was treated operatively with the angled blade plate device between 2007 and 2012 at our center were reviewed, and the patients were contacted for follow-up. The functional outcome (traumatic hip rating score) and radiographic outcome (the neck-shaft angle at the time of fixation and final follow-up) were obtained for 20 of the 26 patients at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. RESULTS: All 26 patients had primary surgery. At final review, 2 patients had died and 4 had been lost to follow-up. Of the 4 patients lost to follow-up, 2 had revision of the fixation with the angled blade plate. Of the 20 patients with follow-up, 1 had malreduction and implant failure but eventually had healing after revision of the fixation with the angled blade plate. The mean traumatic hip rating score at the time of follow-up was 50.0 with 4, 14, and 2 patients having excellent, good, and failed outcomes, respectively. The mean neck-shaft angle at the time of final union was 126.16°, which was an average of 4° less than that on the unaffected side. However, this did not correlate with functional outcome. There was no significant difference between the immediate postoperative and final neck-shaft angles. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that blade plate fixation for 31A3 fractures is associated with low rates of failure (15%), revision surgery (15%), and infection (15%), which are comparable with the results of nail fixation (range, 5% to 12%) and superior to those of sliding hip screw fixation. This large series demonstrates that the angled blade plate can be utilized for these complex fractures and should be part of the armamentarium for these injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Clavos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Clavos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Placas Óseas/estadística & datos numéricos , Tornillos Óseos/efectos adversos , Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Curación de Fractura , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate whether rigid fixation after triple pelvic osteotomy (TPO) utilizing a 3.5-mm locking plate and screws without hip spica cast can provide enough stability and prevent correction loss in pediatric patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 21 hips of 21 pediatric patients (9 males, 12 females; mean age: 9.3±2.0 years; range, 6 to 14 years) who underwent rigid fixation with locking plate/screws after TPO for DDH and LCPD between June 2015 and October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and six-month follow-up anteroposterior radiographs were compared for the Wiberg's center-edge angle (CE), Sharp angle, acetabular coverage of the femoral head (ACFH), and center-head distance discrepancy (CHDD). The patient demographics, surgery time, perioperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Underlying diagnosis were DDH in 14 patients and LCPD in seven patients. In patients with DDH, postoperative evaluation showed significant increase in the mean CE angle (5.6±16.1° vs. 30.5±9.3°, respectively) and ACFH (46.4±16.8% vs. 84.5±12.1%, respectively), and a significant decrease in the mean Sharp angle (55.3±6.2° vs. 35.6±7.8°, respectively) and CHDD (14.6±10.7% vs. 6.2±5.6%, respectively). The final follow-up revealed that there was no correction loss in these parameters. In the patients with LCPD, postoperative evaluation showed a significant increase in the mean CE (20.1±11.1° vs. 38.3±9.6°, respectively) and ACFH (62.9±18% vs. 91.4±10.1%, respectively), and a significant decrease in the mean Sharp angle (46±3.6° vs. 25.2±5.5°, respectively). The final follow-up revealed that there was no correction loss in radiological parameters. No perioperative complications were noted. CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that rigid fixation construct with a 3.5-mm locking plate and screws without hip spica cast can provide adequate stability to allow early mobilization following TPO in children without any loss of correction, until bony healing at the osteotomy sites.
Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas/estadística & datos numéricos , Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Moldes Quirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Luxación de la Cadera/cirugía , Enfermedad de Legg-Calve-Perthes/cirugía , Osteotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Huesos Pélvicos/cirugía , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , TurquíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of a custom 3D-printed guide for placement of cortical bone screws in the equine navicular bone. STUDY DESIGN: Ex vivo study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Eight pairs of normal adult equine forelimbs. METHODS: A 3.5 × 55 mm cortical screw was placed in the longitudinal axis of each intact navicular bone. Screws were placed with a 3D-printed guide (3D) in one bone and with a traditional aiming device (AD) in the contralateral bone within each pair. Duration of surgery and the number of fluoroscopy images were compared between techniques. Screw placement was subjectively evaluated by gross examination and scored by three boarded veterinary surgeons. RESULTS: The use of a 3D-printed guide reduced the duration of surgery by 6.6 min (±1.5 min) compared to traditional screw placement (20.7 min ± 4.8 min, p < .01). Fewer peri-operative fluoroscopic images were obtained when the 3D guide was used (18 images ± 2.6 images vs. 40 images ± 5.1, p < .01). No difference was detected in navicular screw placement. CONCLUSION: The use of a 3D guide decreased the time required to place screws and the number of intraoperative images taken without affecting screw placement in intact navicular bones. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: 3D-printed guides can aid in the study, practice, and execution of surgical procedures reducing surgical time and radiation exposure throughout the operative period achieving similar results to those obtained with a conventional approach.
Asunto(s)
Tornillos Óseos/veterinaria , Hueso Cortical/cirugía , Caballos/cirugía , Impresión Tridimensional , Cirugía Veterinaria/métodos , Huesos Tarsianos/cirugía , Animales , Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cadáver , Femenino , Fluoroscopía/veterinaria , Masculino , Cirugía Veterinaria/instrumentación , Cirugía Veterinaria/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aims to systematically review the literature comparing surgical treatments options and respective failure rates for basicervical hip fractures. METHODS: A comprehensive search of databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central for studies published in English on or before June 21, 2019 was performed. Selected search terms included "basicervical," "basi cervical," "AO/OTA type 31-B," "femoral neck fracture" AND "bone nails," "bone screws," "fracture fixation," "internal fixation," "arthroplasty," "cephalomedullary," "sliding hip screw," "ORIF," and "treatment outcome." We included studies that assessed outcomes of basicervical fracture fixation using open reduction internal fixation or arthroplasty. Two authors extracted the following data from each paper: study design, country, cohort year, definition of basicervical, intervention type, sample size, patient demographics, follow-up length, percent of fractures that required revision, and the percent of implants that failed. RESULTS: Sixteen articles encompassing 910 patients were included. The main outcome was the percent of implants that required revision. The total revision rates were 8% (8 studies, 157 patients, range 0%-55%) for cephalomedullary nails, 7% (10 studies, 584 patients, range 0%-18%) for sliding hip screws, 23% (3 studies, 40 patients, range 16%-50%) for cannulated screws, 0% (1 study, 6 patients) for total hip arthroplasty, and 8% (2 studies, 13 patients, range 0%-11%) for hemiarthroplasty. CONCLUSION: Management of basicervical fractures with SHS and CMN produces similar failure and re-operation rates. Limited evidence is available on the use of cannulated screws and arthroplasty, but available studies suggest that cannulated screws have an unacceptable revision rate (23%) while arthroplasty may be acceptable. Future studies examining the comparative efficacy of various fixation methods would benefit from strict definition of fracture type as well as consistent reporting of functional outcomes, re-operation rates, and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/diagnóstico , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Fracturas de Cadera/diagnóstico , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Clavos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Clavos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tornillos Óseos/efectos adversos , Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/epidemiología , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Reducción Abierta/efectos adversos , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Reducción Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Pronóstico , Reoperación/métodos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
For pediatric flexible flatfoot, the subtalar extra-articular screw arthroereisis (SESA) and endosinotarsal device are the most popular techniques in current practice. Nevertheless, scarce literature is available comparing the outcomes between these two techniques. Thus, we aimed to provide a meta-analysis for the radiographic and clinical outcomes, respectively. A systemic search for correction of pediatric flexible flatfoot using subtalar arthroereisis was conducted mainly in Pubmed and Scopus, and the search was completed on 31 Dec., 2019. The standardized mean differences (SMD) of postoperative versus preoperative calcaneal pitch and Meary's angle were defined as the primary outcomes, whereas the preoperative versus posteoperative AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) as the secondary outcome. The meta-analysis included 12 comparative studies comprising 2063 feet in total. The quantitative analysis showed a marked improvement in Meary's angle of endosinotarsal cone implant group (SMD: 4.298; 95% CI 2.706-5.889) than exosinotarsal screw group (SMD: 1.264; 95% CI 0.650-1.877). But no significant difference was noted between both groups in calcaneal pitch and AOFAS. The exosinotarsal screw and endosinotarsal device are both effective arthroereisis implant for pediatric flexible flatfoot. While considering the correction of Meary's angle, the endosinotarsal device is better than exosinotarsal screw.
Asunto(s)
Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pie Plano/cirugía , Osteotomía/instrumentación , Osteotomía/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Niño , Humanos , Osteotomía/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There has been a global trend towards individually packaged screws for orthopaedic operations. Traditional practice makes use of screw caddies that require re-sterilization. Individually wrapped screws (IWS) are purported to decrease infection rates and avoid the deleterious effects of repeated screw sterilizations, despite marginal evidence. This review aimed to evaluate the safety, effectiveness and economics of screw caddies with IWS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The literature was surveyed in a systematic fashion between 1998 and 2017 and all relevant health technology assessments, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-controlled studies and case series were sought. Any benefits or otherwise of IWS over screw caddies were then evaluated in the areas of safety, effectiveness and economics. RESULTS: Two level III-3 papers suggested the use of caddies at least as safe as individual screws. Four level III-2 papers demonstrated that screws from caddies were as effective as individual alternatives, while a level III-3 paper reported that individual screws were significantly more expensive than screw caddies. Cost increases to our regional health service from ankle open reduction and internal fixations alone of at least $50,112 (AUD) per annum were calculated. CONCLUSIONS: From the results obtained, the authors recommend the continued use of screw caddies for orthopaedic procedures.
Asunto(s)
Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
To assess whether far-cortical locking (FCL) screws alter the fracture site strain environment and allow shorter bridge plate constructs for supracondylar femoral fractures, we tested the fracture site displacement under force of synthetic left femora with a 5-cm metaphyseal fracture gap, modeling comminution. Five models of nine constructs were tested (three types of diaphyseal screws [nonlocking, locking, and FCL] and two plate lengths [13 holes and 5 holes]). Long plate models using three or four diaphyseal screws (working length 13.5 or 7.5 cm, respectively) were compared with short plates with three diaphyseal screws (working length 7.5 cm). Models were loaded axially and torsionally; 100 cycles in random order. Primary outcome measures were axial and torsional fracture site stiffness. FCL screws decreased rotational stiffness 19% (P < .01) compared with baseline nonlocking screws in the same plate and working length construct, mirroring the effect (20% decrease in stiffness, P < .01) of nearly doubling the nonlocking construct working length (7.5-13.5 cm). Similarly, FCL screws decreased axial stiffness 23% (P < .01) in the same baseline comparison. Fracture site displacement under loading comparable to a long working length nonlocked plate construct was achieved using a shorter FCL plate construct. By closely replicating the biomechanical properties of a long plate construct, a fracture site strain environment considered favorable in promoting fracture healing might still be achievable using a shorter plate length. Clinical Significance: It might be possible to optimize fracture site strain environment and displacement under loading using shorter FCL plate constructs. Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 00:00-00, 2020.
Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas/estadística & datos numéricos , Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , HumanosRESUMEN
AIMS: Intraoperative 3D navigation (ION) allows high accuracy to be achieved in spinal surgery, but poor workflow has prevented its widespread uptake. The technical demands on ION when used in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are higher than for other more established indications. Lean principles have been applied to industry and to health care with good effects. While ensuring optimal accuracy of instrumentation and safety, the implementation of ION and its associated productivity was evaluated in this study for AIS surgery in order to enhance the workflow of this technique. The aim was to optimize the use of ION by the application of lean principles in AIS surgery. METHODS: A total of 20 consecutive patients with AIS were treated with ION corrective spinal surgery. Both qualitative and quantitative analysis was performed with real-time modifications. Operating time, scan time, dose length product (measure of CT radiation exposure), use of fluoroscopy, the influence of the reference frame, blood loss, and neuromonitoring were assessed. RESULTS: The greatest gains in productivity were in avoiding repeat intraoperative scans (a mean of 248 minutes for patients who had two scans, and a mean 180 minutes for those who had a single scan). Optimizing accuracy was the biggest factor influencing this, which was reliant on incremental changes to the operating setup and technique. CONCLUSION: The application of lean principles to the introduction of ION for AIS surgery helps assimilate this method into the environment of the operating theatre. Data and stakeholder analysis identified a reproducible technique for using ION for AIS surgery, reducing operating time, and radiation exposure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(1):5-10.
Asunto(s)
Neuronavegación/métodos , Escoliosis/cirugía , Adolescente , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Fluoroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Masculino , Bloqueantes Neuromusculares/administración & dosificación , Neuronavegación/instrumentación , Tempo Operativo , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Dosis de Radiación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Various internal fixation methods have been used to treat proximal femur fractures and occasionally the fixation material is removed. However, nationwide trends of hardware removals are not known. Thus, this study investigated the hardware removal rates after proximal femur fractures in Finland during 1997-2016. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Finnish adults aged 18 years or older in 1997-2016 formed the basic study population. From the National Hospital Discharge Register patients with trochanteric femur fracture treated with an intramedullary nail (IMN) or dynamic hip screw (DHS), and patients with femoral neck fracture treated with screw fixation, were included. Hardware removal and secondary prosthesis rates were assessed. RESULTS: Altogether 41,253 patients underwent proximal femoral fracture fixation surgery in Finland in 1997-2016. Of these, 16,152 were DHS surgery and 15,724 IMN surgery and 8491 underwent screw operation of femoral neck fracture. The total removal rates of DHS and IMN were 5.5% and 5.4%. The total removal rate of screw fixations of the femoral neck was higher, 18.5%. The total removal rates during the first 3 years after the IMN more than halved in 1997-2013, from 7.6% to 3.7%, whereas the removal rate of the DHS or screw fixation of femoral neck fractures did not show consistent trend. The rate of secondary prosthesis operations following DHS and IMN was low (1.8% for both). This was in clear contrast to the prosthesis rate following screw fixations of the femoral neck (7.2%). CONCLUSIONS: IMN operations largely replaced DHS operations in trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in Finland in 1997-2016. The removal and secondary prosthesis rates of the DHS and IMN were clearly lower than the corresponding rates after screw fixations of the femoral neck fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Epidemiologic study.
Asunto(s)
Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Remoción de Dispositivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas de Cadera , Adolescente , Adulto , Fémur/cirugía , Finlandia , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , HumanosRESUMEN
The aim of this study is to assess if there is a difference in outcomes between a dynamic hip screw with or without an anti-rotation screw in the treatment of hip fractures. All patients with an intracapsular hip fracture who underwent dynamic hip screw osteosynthesis between January 2010 and December 2013 in three Dutch hospitals were reviewed. Minimal follow-up was one year. The study included a total of 364 patients. 24 patients were lost to follow-up and excluded. 297 (87.4%) were in the dynamic hip screw group and 43 (12.6%) in the dynamic hip with anti-rotation screw group. Direct comparison of patient characteristics of the two groups showed significant differences in age, sex, Garden classification and Pauwels classification. Patients operated with a dynamic hip screw and anti-rotation screw are significantly younger and their fractures are significantly more dislocated and steeper. To draw conclusions about differences in outcome, a randomised clinical trial should be performed.
Asunto(s)
Tornillos Óseos , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Fractura-Luxación , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Factores de Edad , Tornillos Óseos/efectos adversos , Tornillos Óseos/clasificación , Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/diagnóstico , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/epidemiología , Fractura-Luxación/diagnóstico , Fractura-Luxación/epidemiología , Fractura-Luxación/genética , Fractura-Luxación/prevención & control , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Curación de Fractura , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Torsión MecánicaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Implant wastage is an under-reported issue in orthopaedics, yet it has been shown to have a significant cost burden on healthcare budgets. In a background of a perilous financial climate in the UK health service, our aim was to define the frequency and costs of implant wastage in orthopaedic trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The trauma theatre's implant logbook was retrospectively analysed between April 2017 and April 2018. Wasted implants were identified by the study authors independently. Patient demographics, implant details and costs were among the data collected. Product codes of wasted implants were used to identify implant costs through the manufacturer. RESULTS: Implant wastage occurred in 25.1% of trauma procedures during the study period. Most wasted implants (91%) were screws. The total cost of implant wastage was £8,377.25 during the 12-month period, accounting for 2% of the total implant budget. Wasted intramedullary nails accounted for almost 50% of the total cost. More than 51% of affected procedures involved a trainee as the primary operator. DISCUSSION: We report the first study of implant wastage in orthopaedics from the UK. Total implant wastage was higher than reported in most of the published literature, although it represented a small portion of the budget. Implant wastage is attributable to surgeons or operating theatre staff in most cases and is compounded by surgeons' limited understanding of implant costs. Initiatives to reduce implant wastage should include raising awareness of costs and departmental wastage to surgeons and operating theatre staff as well as employing preoperative planning techniques.
Asunto(s)
Sistema Musculoesquelético/lesiones , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prótesis e Implantes/economía , Prótesis e Implantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Clavos Ortopédicos/economía , Clavos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tornillos Óseos/economía , Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Anchorage reinforcement is an important issue in orthodontic treatment. There is a lack of evidence regarding the failure rate of mini-implants inserted in the retromolar (RM) area, therefore the purpose of this present study was to evaluate the failure rates of mini-implants inserted in the RM area and to evaluate the factors affecting their stability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of 102 patients (52 female, 55 male; mean age: 18.6years; SD: 5.2years) that had received 110 RM mini-implants for orthodontic treatment from 1.2.2012 to 1.6.2017 was conducted after IRB approval at the department of orthodontics. Clinical notes and photographic images of the patients were analysed to evaluate the dependent and independent variables. The primary outcome was mini-implant failure. Independent variables of patient related factors, mini-implant related factors, orthodontic related factors, surgical related factors, and maintenance-related factors were evaluated by logistic regression models for association to failure rates. RESULTS: A 23.2% failure rate of mini-implants inserted in the RM area was observed. The patient's right side and inflammation were significantly associated with RM mini-implant failure. The odds ratios (relative risk) for mini-implant failure in the right side, and in mini-implants with inflammation around them were 0.166 and 0.188, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Failure rate for RM mini-implants were found to be 23.2%. To minimize RM mini-implant failure, clinicians should attempt to reduce inflammation around the mini-implants, especially for mini-implants placed on the right RM area.
Asunto(s)
Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantación Dental Endoósea/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantes Dentales/estadística & datos numéricos , Falla de Equipo , Métodos de Anclaje en Ortodoncia/instrumentación , Adolescente , Implantación Dental Endoósea/instrumentación , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mandíbula/patología , Maxilar/patología , Diente Molar , Diseño de Aparato Ortodóncico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Técnicas de Movimiento Dental/instrumentación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent recalls of several commonly used elbow arthroplasty implants have prompted interest in the modes by which elbow implants fail and the timing of reports of these failures. METHODS: We reviewed the adverse event reports to the US Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database from 2012 to 2015 regarding elbow arthroplasty to determine the event date and the type of each adverse event. RESULTS: Among 179 total elbow adverse event reports, the most common modes of failure were implant dissociation (23%), loosening (22%), and infection (16%). The most common modes of failure among 58 radial head replacement reports were component dissociation (19%) and linkage screw failure (19%). The percentage distribution of adverse event types differed among different arthroplasty systems and from that reported in published reviews of elbow arthroplasty. Three implant recalls were implemented 2, 5, and 9 years after the first adverse event report in the MAUDE database. For 2 of the recalls, the first reports of the device failures were published 2 and 5 years after the first MAUDE reports. CONCLUSIONS: The MAUDE database is a publicly funded and publicly available means by which surgeons can identify adverse events for the prostheses they use before such information becomes available through journal publication or recall notification. In this study, MAUDE data revealed a higher relative frequency of mechanical dissociation of elbow implants than what has been represented in the literature. Early identification of these adverse events may help surgeons by informing their implant selection and surgical technique.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Codo/estadística & datos numéricos , Prótesis de Codo/estadística & datos numéricos , Falla de Prótesis/etiología , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Codo/efectos adversos , Tornillos Óseos/efectos adversos , Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Prótesis de Codo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Difusión de la Información , Recall de Suministro Médico , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are a major worldwide public health problem and includes two main types of fractures: the intracapsular (cervical) and the extracapsular (trochanteric and subtrochanteric) fractures. The aim of this study on patients with trochanteric and subtrochanteric hip fractures was to describe the epidemiology, treatment and outcome in terms of mortality within the context of a large register study. METHODS: A descriptive epidemiological register study including patients registered in the national Swedish Fracture Register from January 2014 to December 2016. Inclusion criteria were all primary surgically treated traumatic non-pathological trochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures in patients aged 18 years and above. Individual patient data (age, gender, injury location, injury cause, fracture type, treatment and timing of surgery) were retrieved from the register database. Mortality data was obtained via linkage to the Swedish Death Register. RESULTS: A total of 10,548 consecutive patients were identified and included in the study. The mean (±SD) age for all patients was 82 ± 11 years and the majority of the patients were females (69%). Most of the fractures were caused by a fall at the same level (83%) at the patients' accommodation (75%). Fractures were classified using the AO/OTA classification as 31-A1 in 29%, as 31-A2 in 49% and as 31-A3 in 22% of the cases. The most commonly used implant was a short antegrade intramedullary nail (42%), followed by a plate with sliding hip screw (37%). With increasing fracture complexity, the proportion of intramedullary nails was increasing, and also the use of long versus short nails. The majority of the patients were operated within 36 h (90%). There was a higher mortality at 30 days and 1 year for males, and for all those who were delayed to surgery > 36 h. CONCLUSION: Safety measures to prevent fall at elderly patient's accommodation might be a way to reduce the number of trochanteric and subtrochanteric hip fractures. Surgery as soon as possible without delay should be considered to reduce the mortality rate. The selection of surgical methods depends on the fracture complexity.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Mortalidad/tendencias , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Clavos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Placas Óseas/estadística & datos numéricos , Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fracturas de Cadera/etiología , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sexuales , Suecia/epidemiología , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze recent demographic and medical billing trends in treatment of femoral neck fracture of American elderly patients. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was analyzed from 2006 to 2015, for patients aged 65 years and older, using the Current Procedural Terminology codes 27130, 27125, 27235, and 27236. Patient demographics, postoperative complications, and frequency of codes were compared and analyzed over time. Our sample had 17,122 elderly patients, in that, 70% were female, mean age of 80.1 years (standard deviation±6.6 years). RESULTS: The number of cases increased, but age, gender, body mass index, rates of diabetes and smoking did not change over time. Open reduction internal fixation was the most commonly billed code, with 9,169 patients (53.6%), followed by hemiarthroplasty with 5,861 (34.2%) patients. Combined estimated probability of morbidity was 9.8% (standard deviation±5.2%), and did not change significantly over time. Postoperative complication rates were similar between treatments. CONCLUSION: Demographics and morbidity rates in femoral neck fractures of elderly patients did not change significantly from 2006 to 2015. Open reduction internal fixation was the most common treatment followed by hemiarthroplasty.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/epidemiología , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Fijación de Fractura/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemiartroplastia/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/tendencias , Índice de Masa Corporal , Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fijación de Fractura/tendencias , Hemiartroplastia/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Distribución por Sexo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
AIM: To investigate the postoperative complications, such as screw loosening, screw breakage and adjacent segment disease (ASD), in patients who underwent surgery with 2-level dynamic stabilization systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Postoperative complications, clinical improvements and radiological parameters in patients who underwent surgery using a dynamic system for 2-level lumbar stabilization were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 103 patients with lumbar degenerative spinal instability underwent 2-level dynamic stabilization. Clinical findings were reviewed at 2-year followup. Screw breakage and loosening were evaluated during this duration together with clinical findings. RESULTS: Visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were significantly decreased at the four-month evaluation, and they were also decreased at the 1-year follow up and at the 24th postoperative month. ASD was diagnosed in twelve (8 females, 4 males) of the 103 patients in the follow-up radiological and clinical controls. There were 9 screw breakages and 4 screw loosening cases. The complication rate of 2-level dynamic stabilization was high in this study. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that complications (screw loosening or breakage and adjacent segment disease) are not rare after 2-level dynamic stabilization, unlike the acceptable results with the single-level dynamic system. The most probable explanation is that the instrument system behaves more rigidly with every additional segment.
Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/epidemiología , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Turquía/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to investigate factors involved in stress on locking mini-plate/screws used in orthognathic surgery based on patient-specific 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Data were obtained from 10 patients undergoing mandibular advancement by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. All underwent osteosynthesis with 2.0-mm titanium locking mini-plate/screws. A 3-dimensional finite element model of the mandible was created for each patient and each model subjected to the same loading conditions, which produced different stress values on locking mini-plate/screws. When the contact area of the proximal and distal bone segments was narrower and bone mineral density (BMD) lower, the von Mises stress values on the plate/screws were higher (contact area, p<0.01; BMD, p<0.05). The present results suggest that bone contact area and BMD should be considered as plate stress factors.
Asunto(s)
Análisis de Elementos Finitos , Técnicas de Fijación de Maxilares/instrumentación , Mandíbula/cirugía , Avance Mandibular/instrumentación , Osteotomía Sagital de Rama Mandibular/instrumentación , Osteotomía Sagital de Rama Mandibular/métodos , Osteotomía/instrumentación , Osteotomía/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Densidad Ósea , Placas Óseas/estadística & datos numéricos , Tornillos Óseos/estadística & datos numéricos , Simulación por Computador , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Masculino , Avance Mandibular/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Anatómicos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos/métodos , Estrés Mecánico , Titanio , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adjustable-loop suspensory fixation (ALSF) devices are commonly used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, concern exists regarding the potential for lengthening under cyclical loads. PURPOSE: To compare the residual anterior laxity of 2 methods of femoral fixation, ALSF versus interference screw fixation, in patients undergoing isolated ACLR in the absence of meniscal injuries. To determine the preoperative risk factors associated with residual postoperative anterior laxity. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed comparing 2 groups of patients that underwent primary ACLR using ALSF versus bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. Anterior knee laxity was assessed with Telos stress radiography, while functional outcomes were evaluated with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Tegner activity level scale at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with residual postoperative laxity >3 mm. RESULTS: Of the 1136 patients who underwent ACLR during the study period, 363 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 272 patients (75%) (mean age, 31.7 ± 10.7 years) with a mean follow-up of 25.7 ± 4.6 months (range, 24-36 months) consented to participate (screw group: n = 121; ALSF group: n = 151). The 2 groups were statistically comparable in terms of age, sex ratio, time from injury to surgery, graft diameter, preoperative laxity, preoperative objective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grade, and preoperative Tegner score. The mean postoperative laxity as a continuous variable was significantly different comparing the ALSF and screw groups (1.49 ± 1.98 mm and 2.32 ± 1.97 mm, respectively; P < .001). In the screw group, 76 patients (62.8%) had normal (<3 mm), 40 (33.1%) had nearly normal (3-6 mm), and 5 (4.1%) had abnormal (≥6 mm) postoperative knee laxity according to the IKDC grade, while in the ALSF group, 112 patients (74.2%) had normal, 37 (24.5%) had nearly normal, and 2 (1.3%) had abnormal laxity ( P = .0833). No significant difference was found in KOOS or Tegner scores comparing the 2 femoral fixation methods: KOOS, 90.6 ± 7.5 (ALSF group) and 90.6 ± 7.4 (screw group) ( P = .7631), versus Tegner, 6.5 ± 1.3 (ALSF group) and 6.3 ± 1.4 (screw group) ( P = .2992). A negative correlation was found between postoperative laxity and final Tegner ( rs = -0.303, P < .001) and KOOS scores ( rs = -0.168, P = .005). The initial univariate analysis showed differences between groups of patients with residual knee laxity ≥3 mm and <3 mm on preoperative pivot shift, preoperative laxity, age, fixation type, and preoperative objective IKDC grade. The multivariate analysis on these factors showed that the pivot shift remained the only significant predictor for residual laxity ≥3 mm for pivot shift grade 2 compared with grade 1 (odds ratio, 4.689 [95% CI, 2.465-9.286]) and for pivot shift grade 3 compared with grade 1 (odds ratio, 58.025 [95% CI, 12.757-557.741]) ( P < .001). CONCLUSION: For primary ACLR, the use of an ALSF device for femoral fixation is associated with noninferior postoperative anterior knee laxity results compared with interference screw fixation at a minimum 2 years' follow-up. The preoperative pivot shift is the only significant risk factor for postoperative residual anterior knee laxity >3 mm.