Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 65
Filtrar
2.
Int J Toxicol ; 39(3): 189-197, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32180480

RESUMEN

This survey serves as the tenth in a series of toxicology salary surveys conducted at 3-year intervals and beginning in 1988. An electronic survey instrument was distributed to members of the Society of Toxicology, American College of Toxicology, and 8 additional professional organizations. Question items inquired about gender, age, degree, years of experience, certifications held, areas of specialization, society membership, employment and income. Overall, 1338 responses were received. The results of the toxicology salary survey provide insight into the job market and career path for current and future toxicologists.


Asunto(s)
Salarios y Beneficios/estadística & datos numéricos , Toxicología/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sociedades , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
J Med Toxicol ; 14(3): 242-247, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29845507

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Telemedicine and its use in medical toxicology have existed for some time. There are varied definitions, but existing ones center on using currently available forms of audio, video, and internet communications to provide "real-time" patient care. Definitions have historically limited reimbursement but recently expanded CMS guidelines have improved this. Here we describe our experience with telemedicine and reimbursement. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of all toxicology and billing reimbursement for fiscal year 2016 for a solo Medical Toxicology service. Clinical identifiers were used to match telemedicine consults to hospital financial databases and then removed. Telemedicine consults were isolated, quantified, and described. RESULTS: A total of 16 telemedicine consults were conducted. Average age was 37.2 (range 2 months-82 years). Gender was evenly split at 8:8. Twenty-five percent were pediatric consultations. The main purposes of consultation were as follows: diagnosis and disease management in drug ingestion, triage assistance, clearance consults, antidote administration, and buprenorphine induction. At the time of the work, $1896.00 for 9.3 h of teletoxicology services was reimbursed equating to an hourly reimbursement rate of $203.90/h. LIMITATIONS: Our data was obtained from a toxicology practice with a surrounding infrastructure dedicated to telemedicine. All sites may not have this robust ancillary support. Furthermore, not all states have reimbursement mandates such as New York State. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first published work describing pilot data in the successful reimbursement for Medical Toxicology services delivered via telemedicine. Toxicology via telemedicine represents a great opportunity for advancing the practice of toxicology in an economically feasible way, particularly in rural or underserved areas.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Telemedicina/economía , Telemedicina/métodos , Toxicología/economía , Toxicología/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antídotos/uso terapéutico , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Intoxicación/diagnóstico , Intoxicación/tratamiento farmacológico , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios Retrospectivos , Flujo de Trabajo , Adulto Joven
5.
Toxicol Pathol ; 45(8): 1039-1042, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29233077

RESUMEN

Real-time telepathology for use in investigative and regulated preclinical toxicology studies is now feasible. Newly developed microscope-integrated telepathology systems enable geographically remote stakeholders to view the live histopathology slide as seen by the study pathologist within the microscope. Simultaneous online viewing and dialog between study pathologist and remote colleagues is an efficient and cost-effective means for consultation, pathology working groups, and peer review, facilitating good science and economic benefits by enabling more timely and informed clinical decisions.


Asunto(s)
Difusión de la Información/métodos , Microscopía/métodos , Consulta Remota/tendencias , Telepatología/tendencias , Toxicología/tendencias , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Microscopía/economía , Consulta Remota/economía , Telepatología/economía , Toxicología/economía
6.
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods ; 88(Pt 1): 85-91, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28797763

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Safety pharmacology is a growing discipline with scientists broadly distributed across international geographical regions. This electronic salary survey is the first to be distributed amongst the entire Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) membership. An electronic survey was sent to all members of the Society. Categorical survey questions assessed membership employment types, annual incomes, and professional certifications, along with other associated career attributes. METHODS: This survey was distributed to the SPS membership that is comprised of safety pharmacologists, toxicologists and pharmacologists working globally in the pharmaceutical industry, at contract research organizations (CRO), regulatory agencies, and academia or within the technology provider industry. The survey was open for responses from December 2015 to March 2016. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 28% (129/453). North America (68%) was the region with the largest number of respondents followed by Europe (28%). A preponderance of respondents (77%) had 12years of industry experience or more. 52% of responders earned annually between $40,000 and $120,000. As expected, salary was generally positively correlated with the number of years of experience in the industry or the educational background but there was no correlation between salary and the number of employee's directly supervised. The median salary was higher for male vs female respondents, but so was median age, indicative of no gender 'salary gap'. DISCUSSION: Our 2016 SPS salary survey results showcased significant diversity regarding factors that can influence salary compensation within this discipline. These data provided insights into the complex global job market trends. They also revealed the level of scientific specialization embedded within the organization, presently uniquely positioned to support the dynamic career paths of current and future safety pharmacologists.


Asunto(s)
Farmacología/economía , Salarios y Beneficios/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades/economía , Toxicología/economía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Math Biosci ; 290: 1-8, 2017 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28549867

RESUMEN

There is an urgent need to refine strategies for testing the safety of chemical compounds. This need arises both from the financial and ethical costs of animal tests, but also from the opportunities presented by new in-vitro and in-silico alternatives. Here we explore the mathematical theory underpinning the formulation of optimal testing strategies in toxicology. We show how the costs and imprecisions of the various tests, and the variability in exposures and responses of individuals, can be assembled rationally to form a Markov Decision Problem. We compute the corresponding optimal policies using well developed theory based on Dynamic Programming, thereby identifying and overcoming some methodological and logical inconsistencies which may exist in the current toxicological testing. By illustrating our methods for two simple but readily generalisable examples we show how so-called integrated testing strategies, where information of different precisions from different sources is combined and where different initial test outcomes lead to different sets of future tests, can arise naturally as optimal policies.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Toxicidad/métodos , Toxicología/métodos , Simulación por Computador , Humanos , Cadenas de Markov , Medición de Riesgo , Pruebas de Toxicidad/economía , Toxicología/economía
9.
Przegl Lek ; 72(9): 491-2, 2015.
Artículo en Polaco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26827576

RESUMEN

Since 2014 we are heading the third programming period of help from European Union (EU). The new budget will run until 2020. From common resources of EU, 106 billion euro will reach Poland, of which about 82.3 billion to cohesion policy, levelling differences of regional development. Clinical toxicology centres will be able to apply for funding under the allocation for the health service. Polish health service very actively benefited from EU funds in previous programming periods, between 2004-2006, and 2007-2013. Thanks to grants from the EU, a large number of health centres were built or renovated. Unfortunately the needs of hospitals, which were underinvested for many years, exceeded available funds according to UE programmes. Except investment projects, also projects training of health professionals were executed. In the current programming period European Union will still support projects aimed at health service. Clinical toxicology centres should have a try of using this period to fulfil their plans.


Asunto(s)
Administración Financiera , Servicios de Salud/economía , Toxicología/economía , Unión Europea , Personal de Salud/educación , Humanos , Polonia
10.
J Med Toxicol ; 11(1): 59-64, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25502603

RESUMEN

We previously reported the financial data for the first 5 years of one of the author's medical toxicology practice. The practice has matured; changes have been made. The practice is increasing its focus on office-based encounters and reducing hospital-based acute care encounters. We report the reimbursement rates and other financial metrics of the current practice. Financial records from October 2009 through September 2013 were reviewed. This is a period of 4 fiscal years and represents the currently available financial data. Charges, payments, and reimbursement rates were recorded according to the type and setting of the medical toxicology encounter: forensic consultations, outpatient clinic encounters, nonpsychiatric inpatient consultations, emergency department (ED) consultations, and inpatient psychiatric consultations. All patients were seen regardless of ability to pay or insurance status. The number of billed Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for office-based encounters increased over the study period; the number of billed CPT codes for inpatient and ED consultations reduced. Office-based encounters demonstrate a higher reimbursement rate and higher payments. In the fiscal year (FY) of 2012, office-based revenue exceeded hospital-based acute care revenue by over $140,000 despite a higher number of billed CPT encounters in acute care settings, and outpatient payments were 2.39 times higher than inpatient, inpatient psychiatry, observation unit, and ED payments combined. The average payment per CPT code was higher for outpatient clinic encounters than inpatient encounters for each fiscal year studied. There was an overall reduction in CPT billing volume between FY 2010 and FY 2013. Despite this, there was an increase in total practice revenue. There was no change in payor mix, practice logistics, or billing/collection service company. In this medical toxicology practice, office-based encounters demonstrate higher reimbursement rates and overall payments compared to inpatient and ED consultations. While consistent with our previous studies, these differences have been accentuated. This study demonstrates the results of changes to the practice--reduced inpatient/ED consultations and increased outpatient encounters. These practice changes resulted in higher overall revenue despite a lower patient volume. In this analysis, the office-based practice of medical toxicology has higher reimbursement rates, nearly 2.5 times higher, when compared to hospital-based acute care consultations.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Médicos , Intoxicación/terapia , Práctica Privada , Derivación y Consulta , Toxicología , Servicios Urbanos de Salud , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Chicago , Costo de Enfermedad , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Toxicología Forense/economía , Hospitales Urbanos , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Médicos/economía , Intoxicación/economía , Práctica Privada/economía , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Toxicología/economía , Servicios Urbanos de Salud/economía , Recursos Humanos
11.
J Med Toxicol ; 11(1): 48-58, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25252800

RESUMEN

A bedside toxicology consult service may improve clinical care, facilitate patient clearance and disposition, and result in potential cost savings for poisoning exposures. Despite this, there is scant data regarding economic feasibility for such a service. Previously published information suggests low hourly reimbursement at approximately $26.00/h at the bedside for toxicology consultations. A bedside toxicology consultant service was initiated in 2011. Coverage was available 24 h a day for 50 out of 52 weeks. Bedside rounding on toxicology consult patients was available 6/7 days per week. The practice is associated with >800 bed teaching institution in a large upstate NY region with elements of urban and suburban practice. Demographic and billing data was collected for all patients consulted upon from July 1, 2011 to June 31, 2012. In charges of $514,941 were generated during the period of data collection. Monthly average was $42,912. Net reimbursement of charges was 29 % of overall charges at $147,792. In terms of total encounters, net collection rate in which something was reimbursed or "paid" against charges for that encounter was 82.6 % of all encounters at 999/1,210. Average encounter time for inpatients, including critical care, was 1.05 h, and the average time spent for outpatients was 1.18 h. Reimbursement rates appear higher than previously reported. Revenue generated from reimbursement from toxicology consultation can result in recouping a substantial portion of a toxicologist's salary or potentially fund fellowship positions and salaries or toxicology division infrastructure.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales , Intoxicación/terapia , Derivación y Consulta , Toxicología , Centros Médicos Académicos , Costo de Enfermedad , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Implementación de Plan de Salud/economía , Hospitales Urbanos , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/economía , New York , Intoxicación/economía , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Rondas de Enseñanza , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Toxicología/economía , Recursos Humanos
12.
J Med Toxicol ; 11(1): 65-72, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25127915

RESUMEN

There are no published studies that have compared quality outcomes of hospitalized poisoned patients primarily under the care of physician medical toxicologists to patients treated by non-toxicologists. We hypothesized that inpatients primarily cared for by medical toxicologists would exhibit shorter lengths of stay (LOS), lower costs, and decreased mortality. Patients discharged in 2010 and 2011 from seven hospitals within the same health care system and greater metropolitan area with Medicare severity diagnosis-related groups for "poisoning and toxic effects of drugs" with and without major comorbidities or complications (917 & 918, respectively) were identified from a Premier® database. The database contained severity-weighted comparisons between expected and observed outcomes for each patient. Outcome parameters were differences between expected and observed LOS, cost, and percent mortality. These were then compared among groups of patients primarily admitted and cared for by (1) medical toxicologists at one hospital (Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, BGS), (2) non-toxicologists at BGS, and (3) non-toxicologists at six other hospitals. Records of 3,581 patients contained complete data for assessment of at least one outcome measure. Patients cared for by medical toxicologists experienced favorable differences in LOS, costs, and mortality compared with other patient groups (p < 0.001). If patients cared for by non-toxicologists had experienced similar differences in observed over expected values for LOS, cost, and mortality as those cared for by medical toxicologists, there would have been a median savings of 1,483 hospital days, $4.269 million, and a significant decrease in mortality during the 2-year study period. Differences between observed and expected LOS, cost, and mortality in patients primarily cared for by medical toxicologists were significantly better than in patients cared for by non-toxicologists, regardless of facility. These data suggest that significant reductions in patient hospital days, costs, and mortality are possible when medical toxicologists directly care for hospitalized patients.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales , Admisión del Paciente , Intoxicación/terapia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Toxicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Arizona/epidemiología , Ahorro de Costo , Costo de Enfermedad , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Hospitales Urbanos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/economía , Intoxicación/economía , Intoxicación/mortalidad , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Toxicología/economía , Recursos Humanos
13.
Chudoku Kenkyu ; 26(3): 226-33, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24224387

RESUMEN

In a 2008 survey of the 73 emergency and critical care centers around the nation that were equipped with the drug and chemical analytical instrument provided by the Ministry of Welfare (currently the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare) in 1998, 36 of those facilities were using the analytical instruments. Of these 36 facilities, a follow-up survey of the 17 facilities that recorded 50 or analyses per year. Responses were gained from 16 of the facilities and we learned that of those, 14 facilities (87.5%) were conducting analyses using the instrument. There was a positive mutual correlation between the annual number of cases of the 14 facilities conducting analyses with the instrument and the number of work hours. Depending on the instrument in use, average analytical instrument parts and maintenance expenses were roughly three million yen and consumables required a maximum three million yen for analysis of 51-200 cases per year. From this, we calculate that such expenses can be covered under the allowed budget for advanced emergency and critical care centers of 5,000 NHI points (1 point = 10 yen). We found there were few facilities using the instrument for all 15 of the toxic substances recommended for testing by the Japanese Society for Clinical Toxicology. There tended to be no use of the analytical instrument for compounds with no toxicology cases. However, flexible responses were noted at each facility in relation to frequently analyzed compounds. It is thought that a reevaluation of compounds subject to analysis is required.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Química Analítica/instrumentación , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Agencias Gubernamentales , Intoxicación/diagnóstico , Intoxicación/etiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Toxicología/instrumentación , Técnicas de Química Analítica/economía , Técnicas de Química Analítica/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Toxicología/economía , Toxicología/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
Int J Toxicol ; 32(1): 11-22, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23160313

RESUMEN

This survey serves as the eighth in a series of toxicology salary surveys conducted at 3-year intervals and beginning in 1988. An electronic survey instrument was distributed to 5800 individuals including members of the Society of Toxicology, American College of Toxicology, and 23 additional professional organizations. Question items inquired about gender, age, degree, years of experience, certifications held, areas of specialization, society membership, employment and income. Overall, 2057 responses were received (response rate 35.5%). The results of the 2012 survey provide insight into the job market and career path for current and future toxicologists.


Asunto(s)
Salarios y Beneficios , Toxicología/economía , Selección de Profesión , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Salarios y Beneficios/estadística & datos numéricos , Salarios y Beneficios/tendencias , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Desempleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Desempleo/tendencias , Estados Unidos
15.
Toxicon ; 69: 126-30, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23201504

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical education about envenomations and their treatment may convey clinical and zoological details inadequately or flatly. In recent years, the widespread availability of models and videos of venomous species have created unique opportunities for toxinology education. We share our experiences using a new toolkit for educating a diverse array of clinicians, students, and wilderness medicine enthusiasts. METHODS: We examined the cost, number of participants, and satisfaction data since the initiation of a portable workshop featuring high-fidelity exhibits of venomous species. Termed the "Circus Venomous," this educational toolkit consists of several boxes of props, such as plastic models, photos, and preserved specimens of injurious species. The workshop consists of three phases: 1.) participants view all exhibits and answer clinical questions regarding venomous injuries; 2.) short video clips from television, internet, and cinema are viewed together, and myths about envenomation injuries are debunked; 3.) debriefing session and wrap-up. RESULTS: We have utilized the Circus Venomous to teach medical students, residents, practicing community clinicians, nurses, PAs, national and regional parkmedics, and wilderness enthusiasts. The major cost (about $800) was spent on the purchase of highly durable, lifelike models and well preserved real reptile and arachnid specimens. When formal feedback was solicited, the participants expressed high levels of satisfaction, scoring an average of 4.3, 4.4, and 4.3 out of 5 points in the respective areas of content, presentation, and practical value of the activity. Since we have used this exhibit with approximately 250 participants over 2 years, we estimate the materials cost per participant is approximately $3. CONCLUSIONS: The Circus Venomous is a novel, interactive, flexible, and cost-effective teaching tool about envenomation emergencies. We hope that this concept will encourage other clinical educators toward further innovation. Future directions for our group include greater inclusion of marine species into the Circus Venomous, and formal longitudinal testing to measure knowledge retention based on this approach.


Asunto(s)
Toxicología/educación , Toxicología/instrumentación , Animales , Humanos , Internet , Modelos Biológicos , Multimedia , Mordeduras de Serpientes/diagnóstico , Mordeduras de Serpientes/tratamiento farmacológico , Serpientes , Estudiantes de Medicina , Toxicología/economía , Ponzoñas/química , Ponzoñas/toxicidad
17.
ALTEX ; 29(2): 129-37, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22562486

RESUMEN

Foreign substances can have a dramatic and unpredictable adverse effect on human health. In the development of new therapeutic agents, it is essential that the potential adverse effects of all candidates be identified as early as possible. The field of predictive toxicology strives to profile the potential for adverse effects of novel chemical substances before they occur, both with traditional in vivo experimental approaches and increasingly through the development of in vitro and computational methods which can supplement and reduce the need for animal testing. To be maximally effective, the field needs access to the largest possible knowledge base of previous toxicology findings, and such results need to be made available in such a fashion so as to be interoperable, comparable, and compatible with standard toolkits. This necessitates the development of open, public, computable, and standardized toxicology vocabularies and ontologies so as to support the applications required by in silico, in vitro, and in vivo toxicology methods and related analysis and reporting activities. Such ontology development will support data management, model building, integrated analysis, validation and reporting, including regulatory reporting and alternative testing submission requirements as required by guidelines such as the REACH legislation, leading to new scientific advances in a mechanistically-based predictive toxicology. Numerous existing ontology and standards initiatives can contribute to the creation of a toxicology ontology supporting the needs of predictive toxicology and risk assessment. Additionally, new ontologies are needed to satisfy practical use cases and scenarios where gaps currently exist. Developing and integrating these resources will require a well-coordinated and sustained effort across numerous stakeholders engaged in a public-private partnership. In this communication, we set out a roadmap for the development of an integrated toxicology ontology, harnessing existing resources where applicable. We describe the stakeholders' requirements analysis from the academic and industry perspectives, timelines, and expected benefits of this initiative, with a view to engagement with the wider community.


Asunto(s)
Toxicología/métodos , Vocabulario Controlado , Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales , Animales , Biología Computacional , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Investigación , Medición de Riesgo , Toxicología/economía , Toxicología/legislación & jurisprudencia
19.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci ; 42(3): 356-64, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21802639

RESUMEN

This essay examines the relationship between the precautionary principle and uncertainty factors used by toxicologists to estimate acceptable exposure levels for toxic chemicals from animal experiments. It shows that the adoption of uncertainty factors in the United States in the 1950s can be understood by reference to the precautionary principle, but not by cost-benefit analysis because of a lack of relevant quantitative data at that time. In addition, it argues that uncertainty factors continue to be relevant to efforts to implement the precautionary principle and that the precautionary principle should not be restricted to cases involving unquantifiable hazards.


Asunto(s)
Política Pública , Pruebas de Toxicidad/historia , Toxicología/historia , Incertidumbre , Animales , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Historia del Siglo XX , Medición de Riesgo , Pruebas de Toxicidad/economía , Toxicología/economía , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...