Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 972
Filtrar
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 455, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951754

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The rates of labor induction and cesarean delivery is rising worldwide. With the confluence of these trends, the labor induction rate in trials of labor after cesarean can be as high as 27-32.7%. Induction of labor after one previous cesarean (IOLAC) is a high-risk procedure mainly due to the higher risk of uterine rupture. Nevertheless, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists considers IOLAC as an option in motivated and informed women in the appropriate care setting. We sought to identify predictors of a composite of maternal and newborn adverse outcomes following IOLAC. METHODS: The electronic medical records of women who delivered between January 2018 to September 2022 in a Malaysian university hospital were screened to identify cases of IOLAC. A case is classified as a composite adverse outcome if at least one of these 11 adverse outcomes of delivery blood loss ≥ 1000 ml, uterine scar complications, cord prolapse or presentation, placenta abruption, maternal fever (≥ 38 0C), chorioamnionitis, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, Apgar score < 7 at 5 min, umbilical artery cord artery blood pH < 7.1 or base excess ≤-12 mmol/l, and neonatal ICU admission was present. An unplanned cesarean delivery was not considered an adverse outcome as the practical management alternative for a clinically indicated IOLAC was a planned cesarean. Bivariate analysis of participants' characteristics was performed to identify predictors of their association with composite adverse outcome. Characteristics with crude p < 0.10 on bivariate analysis were incorporated into a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis model. RESULTS: Electronic medical records of 19,064 women were screened. 819 IOLAC cases and 98 cases with composite adverse outcomes were identified. Maternal height, ethnicity, previous vaginal delivery, indication of previous cesarean, indication for IOLAC, and method of IOLAC had p < 0.10 on bivariate analysis and were incorporated into a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. After adjustment, only maternal height and IOLAC by vaginal dinoprostone compared to Foley balloon remained significant at p < 0.05. Post hoc adjusted analysis that included all unplanned cesarean as an added qualifier for composite adverse outcome showed higher body mass index, short stature (< 157 cm), not of Chinese ethnicity, no prior vaginal delivery, prior cesarean indicated by labor dystocia, and less favorable Bishop score (< 6) were independent predictors of the expanded composite adverse outcome. CONCLUSION: Shorter women and IOLAC by vaginal dinoprostone compared to Foley balloon were independently predictive of composite of adverse outcome.


Shorter stature and dinoprostone labor induction are independent predictors of a composite maternal-newborn adverse outcome excluding unplanned cesarean delivery.


Asunto(s)
Dinoprostona , Trabajo de Parto Inducido , Parto Vaginal Después de Cesárea , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Dinoprostona/administración & dosificación , Parto Vaginal Después de Cesárea/efectos adversos , Parto Vaginal Después de Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido , Oxitócicos/administración & dosificación , Oxitócicos/efectos adversos , Oxitócicos/uso terapéutico , Administración Intravaginal , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Malasia/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38994464

RESUMEN

Objective: To evaluate the risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) according to the Robson Classification in a low-risk maternity hospital. Methods: We conducted retrospective cohort study by analyzing the medical records of pregnant women attended in a low-risk maternity hospital, during from November 2019 to November 2021. Variables analyzed were: maternal age, type of delivery, birth weight, parity, Robson Classification, and causes of PPH. We compared the occurrence of PPH between pregnant women with spontaneous (Groups 1 and 3) and with induction of labor (2a and 4a). Chi-square and Student t-tests were performed. Variables were compared using binary logistic regression. Results: There were 11,935 deliveries during the study period. According to Robson's Classification, 48.2% were classified as 1 and 3 (Group I: 5,750/11,935) and 26.1% as 2a and 4a (Group II: 3,124/11,935). Group II had higher prevalence of PPH than Group I (3.5 vs. 2.7%, p=0.028). Labor induction increased the occurrence of PPH by 18.8% (RR: 1.188, 95% CI: 1.02-1.36, p=0.030). Model including forceps delivery [x2(3)=10.6, OR: 7.26, 95%CI: 3.32-15.84, R2 Nagelkerke: 0.011, p<0.001] and birth weight [x2(4)=59.0, OR: 1.001, 95%CI:1.001-1.001, R2 Nagelkerke: 0.033, p<0.001] was the best for predicting PPH in patients classified as Robson 1, 3, 2a, and 4a. Birth weight was poor predictor of PPH (area under ROC curve: 0.612, p<0.001, 95%CI: 0.572-0.653). Conclusion: Robson Classification 2a and 4a showed the highest rates of postpartum hemorrhage. The model including forceps delivery and birth weight was the best predictor for postpartum hemorrhage in Robson Classification 1, 3, 2a, and 4a.


Asunto(s)
Maternidades , Hemorragia Posparto , Humanos , Femenino , Hemorragia Posparto/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posparto/clasificación , Hemorragia Posparto/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Embarazo , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Maternidades/estadística & datos numéricos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Paridad , Peso al Nacer , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Prevalencia , Edad Materna
4.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0301684, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38820521

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Childhood and adolescent obesity are major, preventable public health concerns. Studies to date are inconclusive regarding an association between caesarean section (CS) delivery and offspring obesity, with fewer studies conducted in late adolescence. This study examined the association between CS delivery, with a specific focus on planned CS, and induction of labour and adolescent body mass index (BMI) and body fat percentage (BF%) at age 17 years. METHODS: Data on 8,880 mother-child pairs from the United Kingdom Millennium Cohort Study were analysed. The exposures were mode of delivery (normal vaginal delivery (VD) (reference), assisted VD, planned CS and emergency CS) and mode of delivery by induction of labour status. Crude and adjusted binary logistic regression and linear regression models were fitted examining BMI and BF% at age 17 years respectively, adjusting for several potential confounders. RESULTS: Adolescents born by CS did not have an elevated BMI or BF% compared to those born by normal VD. The fully adjusted results for overweight and obesity in children born by planned CS, compared to VD, were 1.05 (95% CI: 0.86-1.28) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.72-1.23), respectively. The results were similar for the associations between CS and BF%, and between induction of labour and BMI. CONCLUSION: Overall, this large longitudinal study did not support an association between CS or induction of labour and overweight, obesity or BF%. It is possible that previously reported associations are due to residual or unmeasured confounding and/or underlying indications for CS delivery.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Cesárea , Humanos , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adolescente , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Embarazo , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad Infantil/epidemiología , Adulto , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/estadística & datos numéricos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos
5.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 113, 2024 Feb 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38347537

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of oligohydramnios ranges from 12 to 14% after 41 weeks to as high as 30% in post term pregnancies. Oligohydramnios poses a dilemma in the choice of mode of labor and delivery in a setup where there is lack of continuous electronic fetal monitoring during labor. The condition also puts the mother at risks of operative interventions and cesarean delivery. We aimed to asses the maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with oligohydramnios in late term and post term pregnancy in this study. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among mothers with diagnosis of oligohydramnios after 40+ 6 weeks of gestation at four hospitals at four public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from May 1, 2021 to September 30, 2021. Data were collected using structured questionnaire. Logistic regression were performed to assess factors associated with the adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: From a total of 142 mothers with oligohydramnios in late term and post tem pregnancies, 40.8% delivered through cesarean section. Spontaneous labor and elective cesarean section were more likely to occurr in parous women (AOR 2.5, 95% CI 1.06-6.04, p = 0.04), but with less likely in those with secondary level education (AOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.74, p = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in adverse outcomes between those who had induction of labor and those who had either spontaneous labor or had elective cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS: The adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in late term and post term pregnancies with oligohydramnios may not be different among different modes of delivery. Induction of labor can be safe in these particular group of women with intermittent auscultation with fetoscope in a setup where continuous electronic fetal monitoring is not readily available.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Oligohidramnios , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Oligohidramnios/epidemiología , Oligohidramnios/etiología , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Transversales , Etiopía , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Hospitales Públicos
6.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 165(1): 368-374, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38299786

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the labor duration and other maternal and neonatal outcomes between hospitalized women with uncomplicated pregnancies receiving amniotomy at 5 cm cervical dilatation and those not receiving amniotomy. METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary hospital between June 2020 and October 2021. The study included low-risk pregnant women with spontaneous onset of labor at term, carrying a single fetus in cephalic presentation and with intact amniotic membranes. When the cervical dilatation reached 5 cm, participants were randomly assigned to receive or not receive amniotomy. Maternal demographics, labor and delivery data, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The amniotomy group had a significantly shorter duration of labor compared with the control group (mean difference 49.4 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16.8-81.9, P = 0.003). The following outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups: (1) the need for oxytocin to augment labor; (2) cesarean section rates; (3) the incidence rates of suspected fetal distress and instrumental delivery; and (4) neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with expectant management, amniotomy during the active phase of labor (as newly defined by WHO) can shorten the labor duration without an increased risk of cesarean delivery or other negative consequences. THAI CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY (TCTR) (TCTR20200522001): https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20200522001.


Asunto(s)
Amniotomía , Cesárea , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Espera Vigilante , Estudios Prospectivos , Oxitocina , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos
7.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 230(3S): S662-S668, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38299461

RESUMEN

A primary goal of obstetrical practice is the optimization of maternal and perinatal health. This goal translates into a seemingly simple assessment with regard to considerations of the timing of delivery: delivery should occur when the benefits are greater than those of continued pregnancy. In the absence of an indication for cesarean delivery, planned delivery is initiated with induction of labor. When medical or obstetrical complications exist, they may guide recommendations regarding the timing of delivery. In the absence of these complications, gestational age also has been used to guide delivery timing, given its association with both maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes. If there is no medical indication, delivery before 39 weeks has been discouraged, given its association with greater chances of adverse perinatal outcomes. Conversely, it has been recommended that delivery occur by 42 weeks of gestation, given the perinatal risks that accrue in the post-term period. Historically, a 39-week induction of labor, particularly for individuals with no previous birth, has not been routinely offered in the absence of medical or obstetrical indications. That approach was based on numerous observational studies that demonstrated an increased risk of cesarean delivery and other adverse outcomes among individuals who underwent labor induction compared to those in spontaneous labor. However, from a management and person-centered-choice perspective, the relevant comparison is between those undergoing planned labor induction at a given time vs those planning to continue pregnancy beyond that time. When individuals have been compared using that rubric-either in observational studies or randomized trials that have been performed in a wide variety of locations and populations- there has not been evidence that induction increases adverse perinatal or maternal outcomes. Conversely, even when the only indication for delivery is the achievement of a full-term gestational age, evidence suggests that multiple different outcomes, including cesarean delivery, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, neonatal respiratory impairment, and perinatal mortality, are less likely when induction is performed. This information underscores the importance of making the preferences of pregnant individuals for different birth processes and outcomes central to the approach to delivery timing.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Trabajo de Parto Inducido , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Parto , Resultado del Embarazo , Mortalidad Perinatal , Edad Gestacional
8.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 166(1): 373-380, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38234165

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The study aims to assess how oral misoprostol for cervical ripening affects the time of cesarean delivery (CD) for fetal heart rate (FHR) abnormalities in pre-eclampsia patients. Secondary goals include determining the role of uterine hyperstimulation, comparing misoprostol with Foley catheter, and identifying risk factors for FHR abnormalities associated with CD. METHODS: A previously published randomized clinical trial was subjected to a secondary analysis (NCT01801410). We conducted a time-dependent analysis, stratifying the population based on the final mode of induction used (low-dose oral misoprostol vs Foley catheter). RESULTS: There was no CD for FHR abnormalities within 2 h of starting misoprostol. At 5 h, the cumulative incidence of CD for FHR abnormalities in the misoprostol group was 2.10%, while it was 1.00% in the Foley group (P = 0.565). After 25 h, the CD risk for FHR abnormalities remained constant in both groups at 21.00% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.00%-28.00%). Within 5 h of misoprostol induction, the risk of uterine hyperstimulation was similar in both groups (0.33% in misoprostol vs 0.34% in Foley group, P = 0.161). The risk of CD for FHR abnormalities was unaffected by newborn weight centiles. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in CD risk for FHR abnormalities between misoprostol and Foley catheter induction. Nonetheless, the cumulative incidence of CD for FHR abnormalities increased faster in the misoprostol group, indicating that FHR monitoring timing should be tailored to the induction method.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Frecuencia Cardíaca Fetal , Trabajo de Parto Inducido , Misoprostol , Oxitócicos , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Misoprostol/efectos adversos , Frecuencia Cardíaca Fetal/efectos de los fármacos , Oxitócicos/administración & dosificación , Oxitócicos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/métodos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Factores de Tiempo , Maduración Cervical/efectos de los fármacos , Cateterismo Urinario/métodos , Preeclampsia , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo
9.
Obstet Gynecol ; 143(4): 550-553, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38262065

RESUMEN

Previable and periviable rupture of membranes is associated with significant morbidity for the pregnant patient. For those who have a choice of options and undergo active management, it is not known how the risks of induction of labor compare with those for dilation and evacuation (D&E). We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with rupture of membranes between 14 0/7 and 23 6/7 weeks of gestation who opted for active management. Adverse events (52.2% vs 16.9%, P <.01) and time to uterine evacuation greater than 24 hours (26.7% vs 9.6%, P =.01) were more common among patients undergoing induction of labor. In a multivariable regression, induction of labor was an independent risk factor for complications (odds ratio 5.70, 95% CI, 2.35-13.82) compared with D&E. Severe complications were rare across both groups (4.4% for patients undergoing induction vs 2.6% for D&E, P =.63). Given the differing risks by termination method, access to D&E is an important treatment option for this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Aborto Inducido/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dilatación , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/métodos
10.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 164(2): 732-740, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37568268

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between induction of labor (IOL) and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal delivery. METHODS: We included women from the merged database of three randomized prospective trials (TRACOR, CYTOCINON, and TRAAP) that measured postpartum blood loss precisely, with standardized methods. IOL was considered overall and according to its method. The association between IOL and PPH was tested by multivariate logistic regression modeling, adjusted for confounders, and by propensity score matching. The role of potential intermediate factors, i.e. estimated quantity of oxytocin administered during labor and operative vaginal delivery, was assessed with structural equation modeling. RESULTS: Labor was induced for 1809 of the 9209 (19.6%) women. IOL was associated with a significantly higher risk of PPH of 500 mL or more (adjusted odds ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.42-1.70) and PPH of 1000 mL or more (adjusted odds ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.96). The risk of PPH increased similarly regardless of the method of induction. The results were similar after propensity score matching (odds ratio for PPH ≥500 mL 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.33-1.87, odds ratio for PPH ≥1000 mL 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.07). Structural equation modeling showed that 34% of this association was mediated by the quantity of oxytocin administered during labor and 1.3% by women who underwent operative vaginal delivery. CONCLUSION: Among women with vaginal delivery, the risk of PPH is higher in those with IOL, regardless of its method, and after accounting for indication bias. The quantity of oxytocin administered during labor may explain one third of this association.


Asunto(s)
Oxitócicos , Hemorragia Posparto , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Hemorragia Posparto/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posparto/etiología , Oxitocina/efectos adversos , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Prospectivos , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Tercer Periodo del Trabajo de Parto , Oxitócicos/efectos adversos
11.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 230(2): 247.e1-247.e9, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37541482

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported conflicting results on the relationship between oxytocin use for labor augmentation and the risk of postpartum hemorrhage, probably because it is rather challenging to disentangle oxytocin use from labor dystocia. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the independent association between oxytocin use for augmentation and the risk of postpartum hemorrhage by using advanced statistical modeling to control for labor patterns and other covariates. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from 20,899 term, cephalic, singleton pregnancies of patients with spontaneous onset of labor and no previous cesarean delivery from Intermountain Healthcare in Utah in the Consortium on Safe Labor. Presence of postpartum hemorrhage was identified on the basis of a clinical diagnosis. Propensity scores were calculated using a generalized linear mixed model for oxytocin use for augmentation, and covariate balancing generalized propensity score was applied to obtain propensity scores for the duration and total dosage of oxytocin augmentation. A weighted generalized additive mixed model was used to depict dose-response curves between the duration and total dosage of oxytocin augmentation and the outcomes. The average treatment effects of oxytocin use for augmentation on postpartum hemorrhage and estimated blood loss (mL) were assessed by inverse probability weighting of propensity scores. RESULTS: The odds of both postpartum hemorrhage and estimated blood loss increased modestly when the duration and/or total dosage of oxytocin used for augmentation increased. However, in comparison with women for whom oxytocin was not used, oxytocin augmentation was not clinically or statistically significantly associated with estimated blood loss (6.5 mL; 95% confidence interval, 2.5-10.3) or postpartum hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.24) when rigorously controlling for labor pattern and potential confounders. The results remained consistent regardless of inclusion of women with an intrapartum cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: The odds of postpartum hemorrhage and estimated blood loss increased modestly with increasing duration and total dosage of oxytocin augmentation. However, in comparison with women for whom oxytocin was not used and after controlling for potential confounders, there was no clinically significant association between oxytocin use for augmentation and estimated blood loss or the risk of postpartum hemorrhage.


Asunto(s)
Trabajo de Parto , Oxitócicos , Hemorragia Posparto , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Oxitocina/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Posparto/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Oxitócicos/efectos adversos
12.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 103(2): 304-312, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37969005

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Umbilical cord prolapse (UCP) is a rare but severe obstetric complication in the presence of a rupture of the membranes. Although it is not possible to prevent a spontaneous rupture of the membranes (SROM), it is possible to prevent an amniotomy, which is a commonly used intervention in labor. This study aimed to explore the incidence and risk factors that are associated with UCP in labor when amniotomy is used vs SROM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective nationwide register study was conducted of all births in Sweden from January 2014 to June 2020 that were included in the Swedish Pregnancy Register (n = 717 336). The main outcome, UCP, was identified in the data by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) diagnosis code O69.0. Multiple binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors. RESULTS: Amniotomy was performed in 230 699 (43.6%) of all pregnancies. A UCP occurred in 293 (0.13%) of these cases. SROM occurred in 298 192 (56.4%) of all cases, of which 352 (0.12%) were complicated by UCP. Risk factors that increased the odds of UCP for both amniotomy and SROM were: higher parity, non-cephalic presentation and an induction of labor. Greater gestational age reduced the odds of UCP. Risk factors associated with only amniotomy were previous cesarean section and the presence of polyhydramnios. Identified risk factors for UCP in labor with SROM were a higher maternal age and maternal origin outside of the EU. CONCLUSIONS: UCP is a rare complication in Sweden. Beyond confirming the previously recognized risk factors, this study found induction of labor and previous cesarean section to be risk factors in labor when amniotomy is used.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Rotura Prematura de Membranas Fetales , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Suecia/epidemiología , Amniotomía , Incidencia , Rotura Espontánea/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Cordón Umbilical , Factores de Riesgo , Prolapso
13.
Am J Perinatol ; 41(6): 669-676, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37972937

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the impact of pregnancy weight gain above National Academy of Medicine (NAM) guidelines on cesarean delivery rates following induction. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients who underwent induction at a single tertiary care center between July 2017 and July 2019. Included in the primary study were patients undergoing term (≥37 weeks) labor induction with a singleton gestation, intact membranes, and unfavorable cervical examination (Bishop score of ≤6 and cervical dilation ≤ 2 cm). Eligibility for this analysis was limited to patients with a documented prenatal body mass index (BMI) < 20 weeks' gestation. The primary exposure was gestational weight gain greater than NAM guidelines (WGGG) for a patient's initial BMI category. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery for any indication. RESULTS: Of 1,610 patients included in the original cohort, 1,174 (72.9%) met inclusion criteria for this analysis and 517 (44.0%) of these had weight gain above NAM guidelines. Of the entire cohort, 60.0% were Black and 52.7% had private insurance. In total, 160 patients (31%) with WGGG underwent cesarean compared with 127 patients (19.3%) without WGGG (p < 0.001), which equates to a 59% increased odds of cesarean when controlling for initial BMI category, parity, gestational diabetes, and indication for induction (Adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-2.12). Among only nulliparous patients, WGGG was associated with an increased odds of cesarean (26.4 vs. 38.2%, aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.07-2.10). In multiparous patients, however, there was no difference in cesarean between those with and without WGGG (8.8 vs. 14.1%, aOR 1.85, 95% CI 0.96-3.58). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that weight gain above NAM guidelines is associated with more than a 50% increased odds of cesarean. Patients should be informed of this association as gestational weight gain may be a modifiable risk factor for cesarean delivery. KEY POINTS: · Weight gain above NAM guidelines was associated with a 59% increased odds of cesarean delivery.. · Nulliparous patients with weight gain above NAM guidelines are at higher risk of cesarean delivery.. · No difference in cesarean delivery among multiparous patients regardless of gestational weight gain..


Asunto(s)
Ganancia de Peso Gestacional , Trabajo de Parto , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Aumento de Peso , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 165(1): 328-334, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37925605

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether, after induction of labor with prostaglandin, multiparous (≥2 para) women have an increased risk of uterine rupture compared with nulliparous or uniparous women. METHODS: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study including women who underwent induction with prostaglandin in all maternity wards in Sweden between May 1996 and December 2019 (n = 56 784). The study cohort was obtained by using data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, which contains information from maternity and delivery records. The main outcome measure was uterine rupture. RESULTS: Overall, multiparous women induced with prostaglandin had an increased risk of uterine rupture compared with nulliparous women (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.33 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.38-8.04]; P < 0.007). Multiparous women with no previous cesarean section (CS) induced with prostaglandin had more than three times higher risk of uterine rupture (crude OR, 3.55 [95% Cl, 1.48-8.53]; P = 0.005) compared with nulliparous women and four times higher risk compared with uniparous women (OR, 4.10 [95% CI, 1.12-15.00]; P < 0.033). Multiparous women with previous CS had a decreased risk of uterine rupture compared with uniparous women with one previous CS (crude OR, 0.41 [95% Cl, 0.21-0.78]; P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Our study implies that multiparity in women with no previous CS is a risk factor for uterine rupture when induced with prostaglandin. This should be taken into consideration when deciding on the appropriate method of induction.


Asunto(s)
Rotura Uterina , Parto Vaginal Después de Cesárea , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Paridad , Rotura Uterina/epidemiología , Rotura Uterina/etiología , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Prostaglandinas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/métodos
15.
J Perinat Med ; 52(1): 65-70, 2024 Jan 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37851590

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether maternal colonization with Group B Streptococcus increases the risk for infectious morbidity following transcervical Foley catheter-assisted cervical ripening. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study comparing infectious morbidity and other clinical outcomes by Group B Streptococcus colonization status between all women with singleton pregnancies who underwent Foley catheter-assisted cervical ripening labor induction at a single tertiary medical center during 2011-2021. Multivariable logistic regression explored the relationship between Group B Streptococcus colonization to adverse outcomes while adjusting for relevant clinical variables. RESULTS: A total of 4,409 women were included of whom 886 (20.1 %) were considered Group B Streptococcus carriers and 3,523 (79.9 %) were not. Suspected neonatal sepsis rate was similar between Group B Streptococcus carriers and non-carriers (5.2 vs. 5.0 %, respectively, p=0.78). Neonatal sepsis was confirmed in 7 (0.02 %) cases, all born to non-carriers. Group B Streptococcus carriers had a higher rate of maternal bacteremia compared to non-carriers (1.2 vs. 0.5 %, respectively, p=0.01). Group B Streptococcus colonization was independently associated with maternal bacteremia (adjusted odds ratio 3.05; 95 %CI 1.39, 6.66). CONCLUSIONS: Group B Streptococcus colonization among women undergoing Foley catheter-assisted cervical ripening does not seem to increase the risk for neonatal infection. However, higher rates of maternal bacteremia were detected.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Sepsis Neonatal , Oxitócicos , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis Neonatal/etiología , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Morbilidad , Catéteres/efectos adversos , Bacteriemia/etiología , Streptococcus , Maduración Cervical
16.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 292: 182-186, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38039900

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether induction of labor is associated with lower risk of cesarean section compared to expectant management in patients with isolated polyhydramnios. STUDY DESIGN: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with pregnancies complicated by idiopathic polyhydramnios, documented between 34 and 38 weeks gestation, who were delivered between July 2012 and February 2020. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included chorioamnionitis, endometritis, postpartum hemorrhage, preeclampsia/gestational hypertension, and composite neonatal morbidity. RESULTS: There were 194 patients included with idiopathic polyhydramnios - 115 underwent induction and 79 patients were expectantly managed. Planned induction was associated with a lower rate of CD compared with expectant management but did not meet statistical significance (19.1 % vs 30.4 %, aOR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.24, 1.05). A similar effect was seen when stratifying for parity: both nulliparous (9.1 % vs 16.3 %, aOR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.17, 1.98) and multiparous (32.7 % vs 47.2 %, aOR 0.45, 95 % CI 0.18, 1.15) patients had a lower CD rate when there was a planned induction, though neither group met statistical significance. No differences in maternal or fetal secondary outcomes were identified (chorioamnionitis, endometritis, postpartum hemorrhage, preeclampsia/gestational hypertension, composite neonatal morbidity). CONCLUSION: Lower rates of cesarean section were associated with labor induction for patients with isolated polyhydramnios, but confidence intervals did not reach statistical significance.


Asunto(s)
Corioamnionitis , Endometritis , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo , Polihidramnios , Hemorragia Posparto , Preeclampsia , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Cesárea , Corioamnionitis/epidemiología , Corioamnionitis/etiología , Hemorragia Posparto/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posparto/terapia , Hemorragia Posparto/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Polihidramnios/epidemiología , Espera Vigilante , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/etiología , Preeclampsia/etiología , Endometritis/etiología , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Edad Gestacional
17.
In Vivo ; 38(1): 299-307, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38148072

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Due to still controversial discussion regarding appropriate termination of low-risk singleton pregnancies beyond term, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes depending on gestational age and obstetric management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis including 3.242 low-risk singleton deliveries at the Department of Obstetrics of the University Hospital of Cologne between 2017 and 2022. According to current national guidelines, the cohort was subdivided into three gestational groups, group 1: 40+0-40+6 weeks, group 2: 40+7-40+10 weeks and group 3>40+10 weeks. RESULTS: In our cohort, advanced gestational age was associated with higher rates of secondary caesarean sections, lower rates of spontaneous vaginal deliveries, higher rates of meconium-stained amniotic fluid and depressed neonates with APGAR < 7 after 5 min. Analyzing obstetric management, induction of labor significantly increased the rate of secondary sections and reduced the rate of spontaneous deliveries, while the percentage of assistant vaginal deliveries was independent from obstetric management and gestational age. Induction of labor also significantly enhanced the need for tocolytic subpartu and epidural anesthesia and caused higher rates of abnormalities in cardiotocography (CTG), which also resulted in more frequent fetal scalp blood testing; however, the rate of fetal acidosis was independent of both obstetric management and gestational age. CONCLUSION: Our study supports expectant management of low-risk pregnancies beyond term, as induction of labor increased the rate of secondary sections and did not improve perinatal outcome.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Espera Vigilante , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Parto Obstétrico , Edad Gestacional , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología
18.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 103(3): 505-511, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38112629

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Neonatal and maternal risks increase in term pregnancy as gestational age advances and become increasingly evident post-term. Management practices of late- and post-term pregnancies vary, and the optimal time point for intervention by labor induction is yet to be determined. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial of 381 nulliparous women with unripe cervices compared labor induction at 41+0 gestational weeks (early induction) with expectant management and labor induction at 41+5 to 42+1 gestational weeks (expectant management). This multicenter study included all five university hospitals and the largest central hospital in Finland. The study period was 2018-2022. Participants were randomized to either early induction (48.8%, n = 186) or expectant management (51.2%, n = 195) with equal randomization ratios of 1:1. This was a superiority trial, and the primary outcomes were rates of cesarean section (CS) and composite of adverse neonatal outcomes. The trial was registered at the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN83219789, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN83219789). RESULTS: The rates of CS (16.7% [n = 31] vs. 24.1% [n = 47], RR 0.7 [95% CI: 0.5-1.0], p = 0.07) and a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes (9.7% [n = 18] vs. 14.4% [n = 28], RR 0.7 [95% CI: 0.4-1.2] p = 0.16) did not significantly differ between the groups, but the operative delivery rate was lower in the early induction group than in the expectant management group (30.6% [n = 57] vs. 45.6% [n = 89], p = 0.003). The rates of hemorrhage ≥1000 mL and neonatal weight ≥4000 g were also lower in the early induction group, as was the vacuum extraction rate in women with vaginal delivery. Of the women with expectant management, 45.6% (n = 89) had spontaneous onset of labor. No perinatal deaths occurred, but one case of eclampsia appeared in the expectant management group. CONCLUSIONS: Offering labor induction to nulliparous women at 41+0 gestational weeks may decrease the probability of operative delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, and neonatal weight ≥4000 g. However, this study was underpowered to affirm the trends of rising rates of CS and adverse neonatal outcomes in the expectant management group. Thus, expectant management could remain an option for some, as one in two women with expectant management had a spontaneous onset of labor.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Espera Vigilante , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Finlandia , Parto Obstétrico , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Edad Gestacional
19.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 36(2): 2286433, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38010351

RESUMEN

Objective: To compare neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction (FGR) by intended delivery mode.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies with FGR that were delivered ≥34.0 weeks gestation. Neonatal outcomes were compared according to the intended delivery mode, which the attending obstetrician determined. Of note, none of the subjects had a contraindication to labor. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated via logistic regression models to assess the potential association between intended delivery mode and neonatal morbidity defined as a composite outcome (i.e. umbilical artery pH ≤7.1, 5-min Apgar score ≤7, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, hypoglycemia, intrapartum fetal distress requiring expedited delivery, and perinatal death). A sensitivity analysis excluded intrapartum fetal distress requiring emergency cesarean delivery from the composite outcome since only patients with spontaneous labor or labor induction could meet this criterion. Potential confounders in the adjusted effects models included maternal age, body mass index, hypertensive disorders, diabetes, FGR type (i.e. early or late), and oligohydramnios.Results: Seventy-two (34%) patients had an elective cesarean delivery, 73 (34%) had spontaneous labor and were expected to deliver vaginally, and 67 (32%) underwent labor induction. The composite outcome was observed in 65.3%, 89%, and 88.1% of the groups mentioned above, respectively (p < 0.001). Among patients with spontaneous labor and those scheduled for labor induction, 63% and 47.8% required an emergency cesarean delivery for intrapartum fetal distress. Compared to elective cesarean delivery, spontaneous labor (OR 4.32 [95% CI 1.79, 10.42], p = 0.001; aOR 4.85 [95% CI 1.85, 12.66], p = 0.001), and labor induction (OR 3.92 [95% CI 1.62, 9.49] p = 0.002; aOR 5.29 [95% CI 2.01, 13.87], p = 0.001) had higher odds of adverse neonatal outcomes.Conclusion: In this cohort of FGR, delivering at ≥34 weeks of gestation, pregnancies with spontaneous labor, and those that underwent labor induction had higher odds of neonatal morbidity than elective cesarean delivery.


Asunto(s)
Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal , Trabajo de Parto , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/epidemiología , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sufrimiento Fetal/epidemiología , Sufrimiento Fetal/etiología , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Edad Gestacional
20.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 23(1): 752, 2023 Oct 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37880671

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Individuals with an increased body mass index (BMI) (≥ 30 kg/m2) experience higher rates of perinatal mental health disorders than individuals with BMI < 30. Personal experience of decreased control over labor has been associated with the development postpartum mood and anxiety disorders. However, no studies have investigated the association between BMI and experience of control over labor. This study aimed to assess perceived control over labor and compare patients with BMI ≥ 30 to those with BMI < 30. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study of postpartum patients who delivered at term (37-41 weeks gestation). Postpartum, participants completed the Labour Agentry Scale (LAS), a validated tool to assess perceived control over labor/birth. Demographic, maternal health history and obstetric/neonatal outcomes were abstracted from the patient chart. Bivariate analyses were performed between those with BMI < 30 and those with BMI ≥ 30 using Fisher's exact test. Continuous LAS scores were compared between patients with BMI < 30 and BMI ≥ 30 using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Higher LAS scores indicate higher perceived control over labor. Multivariable linear regression was then performed to account for confounding factors identified a priori. RESULTS: There was no difference in LAS between those with BMI ≥ 30 and BMI < 30. When stratified by World Health Organization (WHO) class of BMI, those with BMI ≥ 40 had a significantly lower LAS scores than those with BMI < 30 (147 vs. 163, p = 0.02), however, this finding was no longer significant after controlling for length of labor and cesarean birth. CONCLUSION: Only participants with the highest BMI experienced decreased control over labor, and this finding was no longer significant after controlling for mode of delivery and length of labor. Further research into the experience of birthing people with BMI ≥ 30 is critical to understand the increased risk of perinatal mood disorders among this population.


Asunto(s)
Trabajo de Parto Inducido , Trabajo de Parto , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios Transversales , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/efectos adversos , Cesárea
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...