Unveiling the role of dorsal root ganglia in spasticity reduction: Insights from contralateral seventh cervical nerve cross transfer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system (CNS) disorders, such as stroke, often lead to spasticity, which result in limb deformities and significant reduction in quality of life. Spasticity arises from disruptions in the normal functioning of cortical and descending inhibitory pathways in the brainstem, leading to abnormal muscle contractions. Contralateral seventh cervical nerve cross transfer (CC7) surgery has been proven to effectively reduce spasticity, but the specific mechanism for its effectiveness is unclear. METHODS: This study aimed to investigate the changes in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) following CC7 surgery. A comprehensive anatomical analysis was conducted through cadaveric study and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study, to accurately measure the regional anatomy of the C7 DRG. DRG perfusion changes were quantitatively assessed by comparing pre- and postoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. RESULTS: In CC7 surgery, the C7 nerve root on the affected side is cut close to the DRG (3.6 ± 1.0 mm), while the C7 nerve root on the healthy side is cut further away from the DRG (65.0 ± 10.0 mm). MRI studies revealed that after C7 proximal neurotomy on the affected side, there was an increase in DRG volume, vascular permeability, and perfusion; after C7 distal neurotomy on the healthy side, there was a decrease in DRG volume, with no significant changes in vascular permeability and perfusion. CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary insights into the mechanisms of spasticity reduction following CC7 surgery, indicating that changes in the DRG, such as increased vascular permeability and perfusion, could disrupt abnormal spinal γ-circuits. The resulting high-perfusion state of DRG, possibly due to heightened neuronal activity and metabolic demands, necessitating further research to verify this hypothesis.

Alternative Nerve Coaptations: End-To-Side and Beyond.

Modern end-to-side (ETS) nerve transfers have undergone several permutations since the early 1990's. Preclinical data have revealed important mechanisms and patterns of donor axon outgrowth into the recipient nerves and target reinnervation. The versatility of ETS nerve transfers can also potentially address several processes that limit functional recovery after nerve injury by babysitting motor end-plates and/or supporting the regenerative environment within the denervated nerve. Further clinical and basic science work is required to clarify the ideal clinical indications, contraindications, and mechanisms of action for these techniques in order to maximize their potential as reconstructive options.

The prerequisites and clinical outcomes of ipsilateral C7 nerve root transfer to the upper trunk for adult C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries.

PURPOSE: Although ipsilateral C7 nerve transfer is used for the treatment of C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries, accurately evaluating the functional quality of the donor nerve (ipsilateral C7 nerve root) is difficult, especially when the C7 nerve root is slightly injured. The purpose of this study was to determine the indicators to evaluate the quality of the ipsilateral C7 nerve and assess the clinical outcomes of this procedure. METHODS: This study employed the following three indicators to assess the quality of the ipsilateral C7 nerve: (1) the muscle strength and electrophysiological status of the latissimus dorsi, triceps brachii, and extensor digitorum communis; (2) the sensibility of the radial three digits, especially the index finger; and (3) the intraoperative appearance, feel and electrophysiological status of the ipsilateral C7 nerve root. Transfer of the ipsilateral C7 nerve root to the upper trunk was implemented only when the following three tests were conducted, the criteria were met, and the clinical outcomes were assessed in eight patients with C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries. RESULTS: Patients were followed-up for an average of 90 ± 42 months. At the final follow-up, all eight patients achieved recovery of elbow flexion, with five and three patients scoring M4 and M3, respectively, according to the Medical Research Council scoring. The shoulder abduction range of motor recovery averaged 86 ± 47° (range, 30°-170°), whereas the shoulder external rotation averaged 51 ± 26° (range, 15°-90°). CONCLUSION: Ipsilateral C7 nerve transfer is a reliable and effective option for the functional reconstruction of the shoulder and elbow after C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries when the three prerequisites are met.

Positive effect of ulnar nerve fascicle transfer to musculocutaneous nerve seeded with allogeneic adipose tissue derived stem cells on nerve regeneration for repairing upper brachial plexus injury in a rat model: A preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic peripheral nerve injury, with an annual incidence reported to be approximately 13-23 per 100,000 people, is a serious clinical condition that can often lead to significant functional impairment and permanent disability. Although nerve transfer has become increasingly popular in the treatment of brachial plexus injuries, satisfactory results cannot be obtained even with total nerve root transfer, especially after serious injuries. To overcome this problem, we hypothesize that the application of stem cells in conjunction with nerve transfer procedures may be a viable alternative to more aggressive treatments that do not result in adequate improvement. Similarly, some preliminary studies have shown that adipose stem cells combined with acellular nerve allograft provide promising results in the repair of brachial plexus injury. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of combining adipose-derived stem cells with nerve transfer procedure in a rat brachial plexus injury model. METHODS: Twenty female Wistar rats weighing 300-350 g and aged 8-10 weeks were randomly divided into two groups: a nerve transfer group (NT group) and a nerve transfer combined adipose stem cell group (NT and ASC group). The upper brachial plexus injury model was established by gently avulsing the C5-C6 roots from the spinal cord with microforceps. A nerve transfer from the ulnar nerve to the musculocutaneous nerve (Oberlin procedure) was performed with or without seeded allogeneic adipose tissue-derived stem cells. Adipose tissue-derived stem cells at a rate of 2 × 106 cells were injected locally to the surface of the nerve transfer area with a 23-gauge needle. Immunohistochemistry (S100 and PGP 9.5 antibodies) and electrophysiological data were used to evaluate the effect of nerve repair 12 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: The mean latency was significantly longer in the NT group (2.0 ± 0.0 ms, 95% CI: 1.96-2.06) than in the NT and ASC group (1.7 ± 0.0 ms, 95% CI: 1.7-1.7) (p < .001). The mean peak value was higher in the NT group (1.7 ± 0.0 mV, 95% CI: 1.7-1.7) than in the NT and ASC group (1.7 ± 0.3 mV, 95% CI: 1.6-1.9) with no significant difference (p = .61). Although S100 and PGP 9.5 positive areas were observed in higher amounts in the NT and ASC group compared to the NT group, the differences were not statistically significant (p = .26 and .08, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study conducted on rats provides preliminary evidence that adipose-derived stem cells may have a positive effect on nerve transfer for the treatment of brachial plexus injury. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these findings.

Superficial Branch of the Radial Nerve Versus Sural Nerve Grafting After Traumatic Adult Brachial Plexus Injury.

The purpose of this study was to compare two sources of nerve graft for brachial plexus reconstruction: the denervated superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) and the sural nerve. Ninety-seven patients who underwent brachial plexus reconstruction with denervated SBRN nerve (24 patients with 24 grafts) or with sural nerve grafting (73 patients with 83 nerve grafts) were included. The two groups were compared with respect to postoperative muscle reinnervation, disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores. In the SBRN group, only four (17%) of the nerve grafts provided grade III or higher muscle function. In the sural nerve group, 31 (37%) of the nerve grafts provided grade III or higher muscle function. Smoking had a negative impact on muscle recovery. Denervated SBRN grafts are associated with inferior outcomes when compared with sural nerve grafts in the treatment of traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(2):080-083, 2024).

Peripheral nerve transfers for dysfunctions in central nervous system injuries: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The review highlights recent advancements and innovative uses of nerve transfer surgery in treating dysfunctions caused by central nervous system (CNS) injuries, with a particular focus on spinal cord injury (SCI), stroke, traumatic brain injury, and cerebral palsy. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted regarding nerve transfer for restoring sensorimotor functions and bladder control following injuries of spinal cord and brain, across PubMed and Web of Science from January 1920 to May 2023. Two independent reviewers undertook article selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment with several appraisal tools, including the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist, and SYRCLE's ROB tool. The study protocol has been registered and reported following PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines. RESULTS: Nine hundred six articles were retrieved, of which 35 studies were included (20 on SCI and 15 on brain injury), with 371 participants included in the surgery group and 192 in the control group. These articles were mostly low-risk, with methodological concerns in study types, highlighting the complexity and diversity. For SCI, the strength of target muscle increased by 3.13 of Medical Research Council grade, and the residual urine volume reduced by more than 100 ml in 15 of 20 patients. For unilateral brain injury, the Fugl-Myer motor assessment (FMA) improved 15.14-26 score in upper extremity compared to 2.35-26 in the control group. The overall reduction in Modified Ashworth score was 0.76-2 compared to 0-1 in the control group. Range of motion (ROM) increased 18.4-80° in elbow, 20.4-110° in wrist and 18.8-130° in forearm, while ROM changed -4.03°-20° in elbow, -2.08°-10° in wrist, -2.26°-20° in forearm in the control group. The improvement of FMA in lower extremity was 9 score compared to the presurgery. CONCLUSION: Nerve transfer generally improves sensorimotor functions in paralyzed limbs and bladder control following CNS injury. The technique effectively creates a 'bypass' for signals and facilitates functional recovery by leveraging neural plasticity. It suggested a future of surgery, neurorehabilitation and robotic-assistants converge to improve outcomes for CNS.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: Factors Predisposing to Successful Pain Score Reduction.

BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has demonstrated efficacy in reducing neuroma and chronic pain. In this article, we investigated postoperative outcomes in our patient cohort, with a focus on the role of nonmodifiable factors such as patient age and gender. METHODS: Patients who had extremity TMR from April 2018 to October 2022 were reviewed. Outcomes of interest included patient age, gender, cause and type of amputation, delayed versus immediate TMR, as well as postoperative improvement in pain as assessed by numerical rating score (NRS). RESULTS: A total of 40 patients underwent TMR on 47 limbs. Mean age was 46.2 ± 17.0 years. Delayed TMR (27, 57.4%) was most commonly performed, followed by immediate and delayed-immediate at 11 (23.4%) and 9 (19.1%), respectively. Amputation level was most commonly above-knee in 20 (42.6%) patients, followed by below-knee (12, 25.5%), transhumeral (8, 17.0%), transradial (6, 12.8%), and shoulder (1, 2.1%). The median time interval between amputation and TMR was 12 months. The median preoperative NRS assessing residual limb pain (RLP) for patients who underwent delayed TMR was 10. The median postoperative NRS assessing RLP for all patients was 0 (interquartile range25-75: 0-5) and significantly improved compared with preoperative NRS (P < 0.001). At the last follow-up for limbs that had delayed and delayed-immediate TMR (n = 36), 33 (91.7%) limbs had more than 50% resolution of RLP. There was a significant difference in median postoperative NRS by gender (4 in men and 0 in women) (P < 0.05). Postoperative median NRS also favored younger patients (0, <50 years compared with 4.5, >50 years) (P < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that, of different variables analyzed, only male gender and older age were predictive of poorer postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSION: TMR showed high efficacy in our cohort, with improved short-term outcomes in women and younger patients.

Acute versus non-acute targeted muscle reinnervation for pain control following major limb amputation: A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has been shown to reduce phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) after major limb amputation. However, the effect of the timing of surgery on pain control and quality of life outcomes is controversial. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the outcomes of acute TMR for pain prevention with non-acute TMR for the treatment of established pain. METHODS: All patients treated with TMR in our institution between January 2018 and December 2021 were evaluated at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-operatively. Pain intensity and quality of life outcomes were assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (Pain Severity and Pain Interference scales) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Outcomes were compared between acute and non-acute TMR using the Wilcoxon ranked-sum test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression was used to account for repeat measures and potential pain confounders. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with 38 major limb amputations were included. Acute TMR patients reported significantly lower RLP and PLP scores, pain interference and pain catastrophisation at all time points (p < 0.05). Acute TMR was significantly associated with lower pain severity and pain interference in a linear mixed-effects model accounting for patient age, gender, amputation indication, amputation site, time post-TMR and repeated surveys (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the complication rate (p = 0.51). CONCLUSION: Acute TMR was associated with clinically and statistically significant pain outcomes that were better than that in non-acute TMR. This suggests that TMR should be performed with preventative intent, when possible, as part of a multidisciplinary approach to pain management, rather than deferred until the development of chronic pain.

Active nerve management for above the knee amputation: A comparison of through the wound versus posterior approach.

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) are used to prevent or treat neuromas in amputees. TMR for above-the-knee amputation (AKA) is most commonly performed through a posterior incision rather than the stump wound because recipient motor nerves are primarily located in the proximal third of the thigh. When preventative TMR is performed with concurrent AKA, a posterior approach requires intraoperative repositioning and an additional incision. The purpose of this study was to evaluate feasibility of TMR and operative times for nerve management performed through the wound compared to a posterior approach in AKA patients to guide surgical decision-making. Patients who underwent AKA with TMR between 2018-2023 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: TMR performed through the wound (Group I) and TMR performed through a posterior approach (Group II). If a nerve was unable to undergo coaptation for TMR due to the lack of suitable donor motor nerves, RPNI was performed. Eighteen patients underwent AKA with nerve management were included from Group I (8 patients) and Group II (10 patients). TMR coaptations performed on distinct nerves was 1.5 ± 0.5 in Group I compared to 2.6 ± 0.5 in Group II (p = 0.001). Operative time for Group I was 200.7 ± 33.4 min compared to 326.5 ± 37.1 min in Group II (p = 0.001). TMR performed through the wound following AKA requires less operative time than a posterior approach. However, since recipient motor nerves are not consistently found near the stump, RPNI may be required with TMR whereas the posterior approach allows for more TMR coaptations.

Long-term functional and clinical outcome of combined targeted muscle reinnervation and osseointegration for functional bionic reconstruction in transhumeral amputees: a case series.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the combination of osseointegration and nerve transfers in 3 transhumeral amputees. DESIGN: Case series. PATIENTS: Three male patients with a unilateral traumatic transhumeral amputation. METHODS: Patients received a combination of osseointegration and targeted muscle reinnervation surgery. Rehabilitation included graded weight training, range of motion exercises, biofeedback, table-top prosthesis training, and controlling the actual device. The impairment in daily life, health-related quality of life, and pain before and after the intervention was evaluated in these patients. Their shoulder range of motion, prosthesis embodiment, and function were documented at a 2- to 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: All 3 patients attended rehabilitation and used their myoelectric prosthesis on a daily basis. Two patients had full shoulder range of motion with the prosthesis, while the other patient had 55° of abduction and 45° of anteversion. They became more independent in their daily life activities after the intervention and incorporated their prosthesis into their body scheme to a high extent. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that patients can benefit from the combined procedure. However, the patients' perspective, risks of the surgical procedures, and the relatively long rehabilitation procedure need to be incorporated in the decision-making.

Upper Extremity Nerve Transfers for Treatment of Nerve Injury After Cervical Spine Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Review.

PURPOSE: Nerve transfers to restore or augment function after spinal cord injury is an expanding field. There is a paucity of information, however, on the use of nerve transfers for patients having undergone spine surgery. The incidence of neurologic deficit after spine surgery is rare but extremely debilitating. The purpose of this study was to describe the functional benefit after upper extremity nerve transfers in the setting of nerve injury after cervical spine surgery. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of all patients who underwent nerve transfers after cervical spine surgery was completed. Patient demographics, injury features, spine surgery procedure, nerve conduction and electromyography study results, time to referral to nerve surgeon, time to surgery, surgical technique and number of nerve transfers performed, complications, postoperative muscle testing, and subjective outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Fourteen nerve transfers were performed in 6 patients after cervical spine surgery. Nerve transfer procedures consisted of a transfer between a median nerve branch of flexor digitorum superficialis into a biceps nerve branch, an ulnar nerve branch of flexor carpi ulnaris into a brachialis nerve branch, a radial nerve branch of triceps muscle into the axillary nerve, and the anterior interosseous nerve into the ulnar motor nerve. Average patient age was 55 years; all patients were male and underwent surgery on their left upper extremity. Average referral time was 7 months, average time to nerve transfer was 9 months, and average follow-up was 21 months. Average preoperative muscle grading was 0.9 of 5, and average postoperative muscle grading was 4.1 of 5 ( P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Upper extremity peripheral nerve transfers can significantly help patients regain muscle function from deficits secondary to cervical spine procedures. The morbidity of the nerve transfers is minimal with measurable improvements in muscle function.

[Postoperative effect analysis of different surgical techniques used in facial nerve reconstruction].

Objective:To investigate the factors and efficacy of different surgical techniques used in facial nerve（FN） reconstruction. Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 24 patients who underwent facial nerve reconstruction surgery in our department from January 2016 to January 2021. The duration of total facial nerve paralysis was less than 18 months. The study included 5 surgical techniques, including 6 cases of FN anastomosis（Group A）, 5 cases of FN grafting（sural nerve or great auricular nerve）（Group B）, 5 cases of side-to-end facial-hypoglossal nerve anastomosis（Group C）, 4 cases of side-to-end FN grafting（sural nerve or great auricular nerve） hypoglossal nerve anastomosis（Group D）, and 4 cases of dual nerve reanimation（Group E）. The postoperative follow-up period was ≥1 year. Results:The HB-Ⅲ level of FN function at 1 year after surgery was 83.3%（5/6） in group A, 60.0%（3/5） in group B, 40.0%（2/5） in group C, 25.0%（1/4） in group D, and 50.0%（2/4） in group E. In patients without multiple FN repair, the incidence of synkinesis was 15.0%（3/20）, while no cases of synkinesis were observed in patients with dual nerve reanimation. The patients who underwent hypoglossal-facial side-to-end anastomosis showed no hypoglossal nerve dysfunction. Conclusion:Different FN repair techniques result in varying postoperative FN function recovery, as personalized repair should be managed. Among the various techniques, FN end-to-end anastomosis after FN transposition is recommended as to reduce the number of anastomotic stoma, while hypoglossal-facial side-to-end anastomosis is advocated as to prevent postoperative hypoglossal nerve dysfunction. Additionally, dual nerve repair can effectively improve smile symmetry and reduce synkinesis, which enhances patients' quality.

The effectiveness of targeted muscle reinnervation in reducing pain and improving quality of life for patients following lower limb amputation.

BACKGROUND: Globally, over 1 million lower limb amputations are performed annually, with approximately 75% of patients experiencing significant pain, profoundly impacting their quality of life and functional capabilities. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has emerged as a surgical solution involving the rerouting of amputated nerves to specific muscle targets. Originally introduced to enhance signal amplification for myoelectric prosthesis control, TMR has expanded its applications to include neuroma management and pain relief. However, the literature assessing patient outcomes is lacking, specifically for lower limb amputees. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of TMR in reducing pain and enhancing functional outcomes for patients who have undergone lower limb amputation. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by examining relevant studies between 2010 and 2023, focusing on pain reduction, functional outcomes and patient-reported quality of life measures. RESULTS: In total, 20 studies were eligible encompassing a total of 778 extremities, of which 75.06% (n = 584) were lower limb amputees. Average age was 46.66 years and patients were predominantly male (n = 70.67%). Seven studies (35%) reported functional outcomes. Patients who underwent primary TMR exhibited lower average patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) scores for phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP). Secondary TMR led to improvements in PLP, RLP and general limb pain as indicated by average numeric rating scale and PROMIS scores. CONCLUSION: The systematic review underscores TMR's potential benefits in alleviating pain, fostering post-amputation rehabilitation and enhancing overall well-being for lower limb amputees.

Optimizing donor fascicle selection in Oberlin's procedure: A retrospective review of anatomical variability using intraoperative neuromonitoring.

BACKGROUND: Transfer of the fascicle carrying the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) branch of the ulnar nerve (UN) to the biceps/brachialis muscle branch of the musculocutaneous nerve (Oberlin's procedure), is a mainstay technique for elbow flexion restoration in patients with upper brachial plexus injury. Despite its widespread use, there are few studies regarding the anatomic location of the donor fascicle for Oberlin's procedure. Our report aims to analyze the anatomical variability of this fascicle within the UN, while obtaining quantifiable, objective data with intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) for donor fascicle selection. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients at our institution who underwent an Oberlin's procedure from September 2019 to July 2023. We used IONM for donor fascicle selection (greatest FCU muscle and least intrinsic hand muscle activation). We prospectively obtained demographic and electrophysiological data, as well as anatomical location of donor fascicles and post-surgical morbidities. Surgeon's perception of FCU/intrinsic muscle contraction was compared to objective muscle amplitude during IONM. RESULTS: Eight patients were included, with a mean age of 30.5 years and an injury-to-surgery interval of 4 months. Donor fascicle was located anterior in two cases, posterior in two, radial in two and ulnar in two patients. Correlation between surgeon's perception and IONM findings were consistent in six (75%) cases. No long term motor or sensory deficits were registered. CONCLUSIONS: Fascicle anatomy within the UN at the proximal arm is highly variable. The use of IONM can aid in optimizing donor fascicle selection for Oberlin's procedure.

Current perspectives on peripheral nerve repair and management of the nerve gap.

From the first surgical repair of a nerve in the 6th century, progress in the field of peripheral nerve surgery has marched on; at first slowly but today at great pace. Whether performing primary neurorrhaphy or managing multiple large nerve defects, the modern nerve surgeon has an extensive range of tools, techniques and choices available to them. Continuous innovation in surgical equipment and technique has enabled the maturation of autografting as a gold standard for reconstruction and welcomed the era of nerve transfer techniques all while bioengineers have continued to add to our armamentarium with implantable devices, such as conduits and acellular allografts. We provide the reader a concise and up-to-date summary of the techniques available to them, and the evidence base for their use when managing nerve transection including current use and applicability of nerve transfer procedures.

Nerve-Targeted Surgical Treatments for Spasticity: A Narrative Review.

Spasticity is a potentially debilitating symptom of various acquired and congenital neurologic pathologies that, without adequate treatment, may lead to long-term disability, compromise functional independence, and negatively impact mental health. Several conservative as well as non-nerve targeted surgical strategies have been developed for the treatment of spasticity, but these may be associated with significant drawbacks, such as adverse side effects to medication, device dependence on intrathecal baclofen pumps, and inadequate relief with tendon-based procedures. In these circumstances, patients may benefit from nerve-targeted surgical interventions such as (i) selective dorsal rhizotomy, (ii) hyperselective neurectomy, and (iii) nerve transfer. When selecting the appropriate surgical approach, preoperative patient characteristics, as well as the risks and benefits of nerve-targeted surgical intervention, must be carefully evaluated. Here, we review the current evidence on the efficacy of these nerve-targeted surgical approaches for treating spasticity across various congenital and acquired neurologic pathologies.

Social media analysis of pain outcomes following targeted muscle reinnervation.

AIM: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) was developed to improve myoelectric prosthesis control for amputees; however, it has become an area of interest in pain modulation. Evidences indicate that this procedure alleviates chronic pain in amputees. The primary objective of this study was to use social media analysis to understand patients' post-operative pain, satisfaction, and recovery time after TMR. METHODS: Data were collected from one Facebook group via posts and comments referencing TMR. Posts published between January 1, 2020, and March 24, 2023 were analyzed. Data collected included pain prior to surgery, pain in immediate post-op period, and change in pain after surgery. RESULTS: Forty-three individuals commented on their TMR experience. Among them, 31 had favorable surgical outcomes, 7 felt that the surgery worsened their pain or there was no significant change in their pain levels, and 5 commented during the initial post-operative period. Twenty-four patients described their pain in the immediate post-operative period and all patients said that the post-operative pain was worse than chronic pain. Among the 28 authors who commented on overall reduction in chronic pain, 24 reported that TMR reduced their pain, whereas 4 reported no change or worsened pain. CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients (24) who reported improvement in chronic pain aligns with the results in current literature suggesting that TMR is a viable treatment option for pain management. With the current medical management of similar conditions, up to 80% of patients remain unsatisfied with pain management. This analysis supports the evidence that TMR is an effective treatment for patients experiencing post-amputation pain.

Retro Oesophageal Transfer of Contralateral C7 in Birth Brachial Plexus Injury - A Retrospective Study.

Background: Presence of available healthy nerve roots on the injured side determines the outcome after nerve reconstruction. Paucity of nerve roots warrants contralateral C7 harvest for optimal results. We aim to study the risks and benefits of retro oesophageal transfer of contralateral C7 root in infants with birth brachial plexus injury. Methods: Study was carried out from 2017 to 2022 in 13 children who have undergone retro oesophageal transfer of contralateral C7 root to affected side. Follow-up period ranged from 8 to 60 months after the surgery. Motor power assessment was done using by active movement scale. Results: Average active movement score for abduction was found to be 6, elbow flexion 5.7, elbow extension 5.8, wrist extension 3, wrist flexion 4, finger flexion 4.8 and finger extension 3.8, respectively. No neurological deficits, limb length anomaly noted in the normal upper limb after contralateral C7 harvest. Conclusions: Retro oesophageal transfer of contralateral C7 is a safe technique in birth brachial plexus injury. The advantage of retro oesophageal transfer is reduction in the length of nerve grafts, thus helping in early neurotisation of distal forearm and hand muscles. The large axonal output from contralateral C7 can be used to reconstruct different nerves without any residual deficits on the normal side. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

[Robot-assisted Microsurgery in Lower Extremity Reconstruction]. / Roboter-assistierte Mikrochirurgie in der Rekonstruktion der unteren Extremität.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, various robotic systems specifically designed for microsurgical tasks have been developed and approved. There is not much evidence for these systems to date. In our study, we examined the use of robot-assisted microsurgery in the reconstruction of the lower extremity. PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data was prospectively collected between February and November 2023. The Symani robotic system was used in 42 robot-assisted microsurgical procedures on the lower extremity, and the results were evaluated and documented. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 57±18 years. A total of 39 free flap reconstructions (95%), one lymphatic surgical procedure (3%) and two nerve transfers (5%) were performed. In total, 46 anastomoses and coaptations were carried out. This included six arterial end-to-end anastomoses (11%), seven arterial end-to-side anastomoses (13%), 36 venous end-to-end anastomoses (65%), two lymphovenous anastomoses (4%), and five epineural coaptations in the context of nerve transfers (9%). Arterial end-to-end anastomoses took an average of 26±12 minutes, and arterial end-to-side anastomoses took 42±21 minutes. The venous anastomoses took an average of 33±12 minutes. Epineural coaptations took an average of 24±13 minutes. In no procedure was there a need for a conversion to conventional hand suturing. There were two arterial thromboses (5%), one of which was successfully revised to save the flap. One total flap loss occurred, but there were no partial flap losses. CONCLUSION: Using the Symani robotic system for microsurgical reconstruction of the lower extremity, we were able to demonstrate results that are comparable to conventional microsurgery.

Nerve transfer for restoration of lower motor neuron-lesioned bladder, urethral and anal sphincter function. Part 4: Effectiveness of the motor reinnervation.

In pilot work, we showed that somatic nerve transfers can restore motor function in long-term decentralized dogs. We continue to explore the effectiveness of motor reinnervation in 30 female dogs. After anesthesia, 12 underwent bilateral transection of coccygeal and sacral (S) spinal roots, dorsal roots of lumbar (L)7, and hypogastric nerves. Twelve months postdecentralization, eight underwent transfer of obturator nerve branches to pelvic nerve vesical branches, and sciatic nerve branches to pudendal nerves, followed by 10 mo recovery (ObNT-ScNT Reinn). The remaining four were euthanized 18 mo postdecentralization (Decentralized). Results were compared with 18 Controls. Squat-and-void postures were tracked during awake cystometry. None showed squat-and-void postures during the decentralization phase. Seven of eight ObNT-ScNT Reinn began showing such postures by 6 mo postreinnervation; one showed a return of defecation postures. Retrograde dyes were injected into the bladder and urethra 3 wk before euthanasia, at which point, roots and transferred nerves were electrically stimulated to evaluate motor function. Upon L2-L6 root stimulation, five of eight ObNT-ScNT Reinn showed elevated detrusor pressure and four showed elevated urethral pressure, compared with L7-S3 root stimulation. After stimulation of sciatic-to-pudendal transferred nerves, three of eight ObNT-ScNT Reinn showed elevated urethral pressure; all showed elevated anal sphincter pressure. Retrogradely labeled neurons were observed in L2-L6 ventral horns (in laminae VI, VIII, and IX) of ObNT-ScNT Reinn versus Controls in which labeled neurons were observed in L7-S3 ventral horns (in lamina VII). This data supports the use of nerve transfer techniques for the restoration of bladder function.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This data supports the use of nerve transfer techniques for the restoration of bladder function.