Donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for haematological malignancies: basic considerations and best practice recommendations from the EBMT.

Since the early description of three patients with relapsed leukaemia after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) who obtained complete remission after donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs), the added value of this procedure to induce or maintain graft-versus-leukaemia immunity has been undisputed. For more than 30 years, DLIs have become common practice as prophylactic, pre-emptive, or therapeutic immunotherapy. However, as with many aspects of allogeneic HCT, centres have developed their own routines and practices, and many questions related to the optimal applications and toxicity, or to the immunobiology of DLI induced tumour-immunity, remain. As a part of the Practice Harmonization and Guidelines Committee and the Cellular Therapy and Immunobiology Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation effort, a panel of experts with clinical and translational knowledge in transplantation immunology and cellular therapy met during a 2-day workshop in September, 2023, in Lille, France, and developed a set of consensus-based recommendations for the application of unmanipulated DLI after allogeneic HCT for haematological malignancies. Given the absence of prospective data in the majority of publications, these recommendations are mostly based on retrospective studies and expert consensus.

The graft versus leukemia effect: donor lymphocyte infusions and cellular therapy.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative therapy for many hematologic malignancies as well as non-malignant conditions. Part of the curative basis underlying HSCT for hematologic malignancies relies upon induction of the graft versus leukemia (GVL) effect in which donor immune cells recognize and eliminate residual malignant cells within the recipient, thereby maintaining remission. GVL is a clinically evident phenomenon; however, specific cell types responsible for inducing this effect and molecular mechanisms involved remain largely undefined. One of the best examples of GVL is observed after donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI), an established therapy for relapsed disease or incipient/anticipated relapse. DLI involves infusion of peripheral blood lymphocytes from the original HSCT donor into the recipient. Sustained remission can be observed in 20-80% of patients treated with DLI depending upon the underlying disease and the intrinsic burden of targeted cells. In this review, we will discuss current knowledge about mechanisms of GVL after DLI, experimental strategies for augmenting GVL by manipulation of DLI (e.g. neoantigen vaccination, specific cell type selection/depletion) and research outlook for improving DLI and cellular immunotherapies for hematologic malignancies through better molecular definition of the GVL effect.

Risk factors for graft-versus-host-disease after donor lymphocyte infusion following T-cell depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Introduction: Unmodified donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can boost the beneficial Graft-versus-Leukemia (GvL) effect but may also induce severe Graft-versus-Host-Disease (GvHD). To improve the balance between GvL and GvHD, it is crucial to identify factors that influence the alloreactivity of DLI. Methods: We investigated the effects of the presence of patient-derived antigen-presenting cells at time of DLI as estimated by the bone marrow (BM) chimerism status, lymphopenia as measured by the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at time of DLI, and the presence of a viral infection (de novo or reactivation) close to DLI on the risk of GvHD after DLI. The cohort consisted of patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who prophylactically or pre-emptively received DLI as standard care after alemtuzumab-based alloSCT. In patients at high risk for relapse, DLI was administered at 3 months after alloSCT (n=88) with a dose of 0.3x106 or 0.15x106 T cells/kg in case of a related or unrelated donor, respectively. All other patients (n=76) received 3x106 or 1.5x106 T cells/kg, respectively, at 6 months after alloSCT. Results: For both DLIs, patients with reduced-intensity conditioning and an unrelated donor had the highest risk of GvHD. For DLI given at three months, viral infection within 1 week before and 2 weeks after DLI was an additional significant risk factor (hazard ratio (HR) 3.66 compared to no viral infection) for GvHD. At six months after alloSCT, viral infections were rare and not associated with GvHD. In contrast, mixed BM chimerism (HR 3.63 for ≥5% mixed chimerism compared to full donor) was an important risk factor for GvHD after DLI given at six months after alloSCT. ALC of <1000x106/l showed a trend for association with GvHD after this DLI (HR 2.05 compared to ≥1000x106/l, 95% confidence interval 0.94-4.45). Furthermore, the data suggested that the presence of a viral infection close to the DLI at three months or ≥5% mixed chimerism at time of the DLI at six months correlated with the severity of GvHD, thereby increasing their negative impact on the current GvHD-relapse-free survival. Conclusion: These data demonstrate that the risk factors for GvHD after DLI depend on the setting of the DLI.

Prophylactic versus Preemptive modified donor lymphocyte infusion for high-risk acute leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter retrospective study.

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been widely used in preventing post-transplant relapse. We conducted this study to compare the superiority of prophylactic modified DLI (pro-DLI) and preemptive modified DLI (pre-DLI) in patients with high-risk relapse features acute leukemia. Pro-DLI was performed in 95 patients, whereas the pre-DLI cohort included 176 patients. In the pre-DLI cohort, 42 patients relapsed without chance for pre-DLI while 95 patients remained CR without detectable minimal residual disease (MRD). Thirty-nine patients in the pre-DLI cohort became minimal MRD positive/mixed chimerism and received pre-DLI. Pro-DLI cohort had higher 3-year progression-free-survival (PFS) (63.4%vs.53.0%, P = 0.026) and overall survival (OS) (65.2% vs. 57.0%, P = 0.14) compared to the pre-DLI cohort. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 25.3% in the pro-DLI cohort which was significantly lower than 36.7% in the pre-DLI cohort (P = 0.02). The cumulative incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD, cGVHD and non-relapse mortality were comparable between cohorts. Multivariable analysis demonstrated strong protective effect of pro-DLI on OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.63, P = 0.04), PFS (HR = 0.54, P = 0.005) and CIR (HR = 0.50, P = 0.005). In high-risk patients with acute leukemia, early scheduled pro-DLI rather than pre-DLI after detectable MRD would reduce post-transplant relapse and improve long-term survival.

Donor lymphocyte infusion for prophylaxis and treatment of relapse in pediatric hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

BACKGROUND: Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is effective for managing patients with hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). However, few studies have explored its optimal use in pediatric populations. Herein, we report our single-center experiences of DLI and factors for predicting its outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study included pediatric patients who had received DLI (between June 1998 and December 2022) after allogeneic HSCT. Data regarding patient characteristics, preemptive DLI disease status, and DLI characteristics were collected. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and graft-vs-host-disease (GVHD) development. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 17 patients with acute leukemia, 3 with chronic leukemia, and 3 with lymphoma. Prophylactic, preemptive, and therapeutic DLI were used in seven, seven, and nine patients, respectively. Patients' median age and DLI dose were 9 years and 4.6 × 10 7 CD3 + cells/kg, respectively. The 5-year OS, EFS, and nonrelapse mortality were 43.5%, 38.3%, and 13.3%, respectively. Approximately 39% of the patients developed grade III or IV acute GVHD, whereas moderate/severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD) occurred in 30% of the evaluable patients. Patients' disease status before HSCT ( p = 0.009) and DLI ( p = 0.018) were the key factors influencing EFS. The implementation of a dose escalation schedule was associated with a marginal reduction in the risk of moderate/severe cGVHD ( p = 0.051). A DLI dose of ≥5 × 10 7 CD3 + cells/kg was significantly associated with a high moderate to severe cGVHD risk ( p = 0.002) and reduced OS ( p = 0.089). CONCLUSION: Patients' disease status before HSCT and DLI may help predict EFS. The use of DLI as a prophylactic and preemptive modality leads to a favorable 5-year EFS. To safely deliver DLI in children, clinicians must maintain vigilant monitoring and prepare patients in advance when escalating the dose to ≥5 × 10 7 CD3 + cells/kg.

Magnesium enhances the graft-versus-tumor effect of donor lymphocytic infusion on hematologic malignancies.

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) cures relapsed hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation through the graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect. Although the important role of magnesium in enhancing immunity has been mentioned in studies, limited clinical data have explored how magnesium affects the efficacy of DLI. Besides, although laboratory data demonstrate that magnesium can enhance CD8+ T cells effector function, whether magnesium regulates the tumor killing effect of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) remains to be explored. Here, for the retrospective study, we collected clinical data of relapsed patients receiving DLI and explored the relationship between different serum magnesium levels and patient outcomes. For in vitro studies, we investigated the effect of magnesium on the cytotoxicity of DLI cells which were PBMCs and preliminarily explored the mechanism. Eighty-one patients were enrolled in this study. It was found that the high post-DLI magnesium level was significantly associated with a higher incidence of complete remission (CR) or partial remission (CR/PR) and a higher possibility of survival. The magnesium level after DLI was an independent risk factor of overall survival. In vitro studies proved that increased magnesium enhanced the cytotoxic function of PBMCs on hematologic malignancies. Besides, magnesium modulated LFA-1 headpiece opening. When blocking the integrin-ligand interaction between LFA-1 and ICAM-1, the regulation effect of magnesium on PBMCs was weakened. Therefore, it was possible that magnesium regulated PBMCs effector function by stimulating LFA-1. These results show that serum magnesium levels affect immunological responses mediated by donor lymphocytes in hematologic malignancies.

The graft-versus-leukemia effect of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusions after allogeneic stem cell transplantation is equally effective in relapse prevention but safer compared to spontaneous graft-versus-host disease.

Therapeutic donor lymphocyte infusions (tDLI) are used to reinforce the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect in relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). In contrast, the role of prophylactic DLI (proDLI) in preventing leukemia relapse has been less clearly established, although supported by retrospective, case-control, and registry analyses. We report a prospective, monocentric, ten year cohort of patients with high risk acute leukemias (AL) or myelodysplasia (MDS) in whom proDLI were applied beyond day +120 post alloSCT to compensate for lack of GvL.272 consecutive allotransplanted AL or MDS patients in complete remission and off immunosuppression at day +120 were stratified according to the prior appearance of relevant GvHD (acute GvHD °II-IV or extensive chronic GvHD) as a clinical indicator for GvL. Escalating doses of unmodified proDLI were applied to 72/272 patients without prior relevant GvHD. Conversely, 157/272 patients with prior spontaneous GvHD did not receive proDLI, nor did 43/272 patients with contraindications (uncontrolled infections, patient refusal, DLI unavailability).By day 160-landmark analysis (median day of first DLI application), proDLI recipients had significantly higher five-year overall (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) (77% and 67%) than patients with spontaneous GvHD (54% and 53%) or with contraindications (46% and 45%) (p=0.003). Relapse incidence for patients with proDLI (30%) or spontaneous GvHD (29%) was significantly lower than in patients with contraindications (39%; p=0.021). With similar GvHD incidence beyond day +160, non-relapse mortality (NRM) was less with proDLI (5%) than without proDLI (18%; p=0.036).In conclusion, proDLI may be able to compensate for lack of GvL in alloSCT recipients with high risk AL or MDS.

Prophylactic or pre-emptive therapies to prevent relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a potent curative treatment for hematological malignancies, but relapse is still a major problem. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and maintenance therapies after transplantation are promising strategies to reduce the risk of relapse. DLI augments the graft-versus-tumor effect by directly adding allo-reactive donor lymphocytes, and has been used in relapsed patients. In this Progress in Hematology (PIH), we will focus on prophylactic or pre-emptive DLI, including DLI from a haploidentical donor. On the other hand, specific drugs, which are used in maintenance therapies for each disease, kill tumor cells directly and/or immunologically by stimulating immune cells. Maintenance therapies should be started early after transplantation without severe myelosuppression. Molecularly targeted drugs are therefore suitable for use in maintenance therapies, and are reviewed in this PIH. The optimal application of these strategies has not yet been established. However, important evidence regarding their efficacies, adverse events, and effects on immune systems is accumulating, and could help to improve outcomes in allogeneic transplantation.

Azacitidine, lenalidomide and donor lymphocyte infusions for relapse of myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukemia and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia after allogeneic transplant: the Azalena-Trial.

Azacitidine (Aza) combined with donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) is an established treatment for relapse of myeloid malignancies after allogeneic transplantation. Based on its immunomodulatory and anti-leukemic properties we considered Lenalidomide (Lena) to act synergistically with Aza/DLI to improve outcome. We, therefore, prospectively investigated tolerability and efficacy of this combination as first salvage therapy for adults with post-transplant relapse of acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Patients were scheduled for eight cycles Aza (75 mg/m2 day 1-7), Lena (2.5 or 5 mg, days 1-21) and up to three DLI with increasing T-cell dosages (0.5×106-1.5×107 cells/kg). Primary endpoint was safety, while secondary endpoints included response, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and overall survival (OS). Fifty patients with molecular (52%) or hematological (48%) relapse of myelodysplastic syndromes (n=24), acute myeloid leukemia (n=23) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (n=3) received a median of seven (range, 1-8) cycles including 14 patients with 2.5 mg and 36 with 5 mg Lena daily dosage. Concomitantly, 34 patients (68%) received at least one DLI. Overall response rate was 56% and 25 patients (50%) achieved complete remission being durable in 80%. Median OS was 21 months and 1-year OS rate 65% with no impact of type of or time to relapse and Lena dosages. Treatment was well tolerated indicated by febrile neutropenia being the only grade ≥3 non-hematologic adverse event in >10% of patients and modest acute (grade 2-4 24%) and chronic (moderate/severe 28%) GvHD incidences. In summary, Lena can be safely added to Aza/DLI without excess of GvHD and toxicity. Its significant anti-leukemic activity suggests that this combination is a novel salvage option for post-transplant relapse (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT02472691).

Pre-emptive and prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion following allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is an allogenic immunotherapy used after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. DLI takes advantage of the graft-versus-tumor effect induced by the infused CD3 + T cells, but may induce graft-versus-host disease. To date, DLI has been attempted to prevent hematological relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with mixed chimerism and molecular relapse (pre-emptive DLI), and as maintenance therapy in patients with high-risk hematological malignancies (prophylactic DLI). DLI response and efficacy depend on patient, disease, and DLI factors. This review discusses the efficacy and risks of DLI, with a focus on pre-emptive and prophylactic use.

Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of early prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion after T cell-depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute leukemia patients.

Prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) starting at 6 months after T cell-depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation (TCD-alloSCT) can introduce a graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effects with low risk of severe graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD). We established a policy to apply low-dose early DLI at 3 months after alloSCT to prevent early relapse. This study analyzes this strategy retrospectively. Of 220 consecutive acute leukemia patients undergoing TCD-alloSCT, 83 were prospectively classified to have a high relapse risk and 43 were scheduled for early DLI. 95% of these patients received freshly harvested DLI within 2 weeks of the planned date. In patients transplanted with reduced intensity conditioning and an unrelated donor, we found an increased cumulative incidence of GvHD between 3 and 6 months after TCD-alloSCT for patients receiving DLI at 3 months compared to patients who did not receive this DLI (0.42 (95%Confidence Interval (95% CI): 0.14-0.70) vs 0). Treatment success was defined as being alive without relapse or need for systemic immunosuppressive GvHD treatment. The five-year treatment success in patients with acute lymphatic leukemia was comparable between high- and non-high-risk disease (0.55 (95% CI: 0.42-0.74) and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.42-0.84)). It remained lower in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (0.29 (95% CI: 0.18-0.46)) than in non-high-risk AML (0.47 (95% CI: 0.42-0.84)) due to an increased relapse rate despite early DLI.

A Multicenter Phase 2 Clinical Trial of 10-Day Decitabine, Dose-Escalated Donor Lymphocyte Infusion, and Ruxolitinib for Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Post-transplantation relapse of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes has a poor prognosis. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is one treatment approach. However, efficacy is limited, and toxicity, mostly in the form of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), is frequent. We tested a novel approach using 10-day decitabine, dose-escalated DLI, and ruxolitinib in a multicenter phase 2 trial aimed at increasing the efficacy of DLI and reducing its toxicity. Up to four 28-day cycles were administered. The primary endpoint was 6-month overall survival (OS). Of the 14 patients who started cycle 1, 13 received 1 DLI, 6 received 2 DLIs, and 1 received 3 4 DLIs. A preplanned interim analysis after enrolling 14 patients suggested futility, and the trial was closed to accrual. The final analysis showed a 6-month OS of 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18 to 72), a 1-year progression-free survival of 7% (95% CI, 1% to 47%), a 6-month cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD of 57% (95% CI, 26% to 80%), and a 1-year nonrelapse mortality of 14% (95% CI, 2% to 38%). The combined modality treatment studied in this trial was ineffective and did not reduce DLI toxicity.

Rhinovirus/enterovirus identification by electron microscopy in lower respiratory tract infection in a patient with relapsed myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and donor lymphocyte infusion.

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is a curable treatment option, inducing a graft-versus-tumor effect in patients with relapsed hematological malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). However, not only graft-versus-host disease but also pulmonary complications are problematic adverse events after DLI. Although viral infections can be associated with pulmonary complications after DLI, the mechanism underlying these complications remains unclear. Detecting the causative virus infections after pulmonary complications following DLI is challenging, as invasive examinations, such as bronchoalveolar lavage and lung biopsies, are necessary. Family Picornaviridae, including Human-Rhinovirus (HRV) and Enterovirus (EnV), can induce fatal lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in recipients who undergo allo-HCT, which can be underdiagnosed. We encountered a 62-year-old man with relapsed myelodysplastic syndrome 20 days after a second HLA-haplo-identical allo-HCT and 4 DLI procedures who was later found to have HRV and EnV LRTI by postmortem electron microscopy. Despite high-dose immunosuppression, severe hypoxemia did not improve, and he succumbed to respiratory failure. Immunosuppressive therapy for idiopathic pneumonia syndrome after allo-HCT may be effective, but its efficacy for acute respiratory failure after DLI is controversial. Our case indicated that the control of viral replication should be prioritized over that of inflammation in HRV and EnV LRTI after DLI.

Competitive Repopulation and Allo-Immunologic Pressure Determine Chimerism Kinetics after T Cell-Depleted Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation and Donor Lymphocyte Infusion.

After allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), patient-derived stem cells that survived the pretransplantation conditioning compete with engrafting donor stem cells for bone marrow (BM) repopulation. In addition, donor-derived alloreactive T cells present in the stem cell product may favor establishment of complete donor-derived hematopoiesis by eliminating patient-derived lymphohematopoietic cells. T cell-depleted alloSCT with sequential transfer of potentially alloreactive T cells by donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) provides a unique opportunity to selectively study how competitive repopulation and allo-immunologic pressure influence lymphohematopoietic recovery. This study aimed to determine the relative contribution of competitive repopulation and donor-derived anti-recipient alloimmunologic pressure on the establishment of lymphohematopoietic chimerism after alloSCT. In this retrospective cohort study of 281 acute leukemia patients treated according to a protocol combining alemtuzumab-based T cell-depleted alloSCT with prophylactic DLI, we investigated engraftment and quantitative donor chimerism in the BM and immune cell subsets. DLI-induced increase of chimerism and development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were analyzed as complementary indicators for donor-derived anti-recipient alloimmunologic pressure. Profound suppression of patient immune cells by conditioning sufficed for sustained engraftment without necessity for myeloablative conditioning or development of clinically significant GVHD. Although 61% of the patients without any DLI or GVHD showed full donor chimerism (FDC) in the BM at 6 months after alloSCT, only 24% showed FDC in the CD4+ T cell compartment. In contrast, 75% of the patients who had received DLI and 83% of the patients with clinically significant GVHD had FDC in this compartment. In addition, 72% of the patients with mixed hematopoiesis receiving DLI converted to complete donor-derived hematopoiesis, of whom only 34% developed clinically significant GVHD. Our data show that competitive repopulation can be sufficient to reach complete donor-derived hematopoiesis, but that some alloimmunologic pressure is needed for the establishment of a completely donor-derived T cell compartment, either by the development of GVHD or by administration of DLI. We illustrate that it is possible to separate the graft-versus-leukemia effect from GVHD, as conversion to durable complete donor-derived hematopoiesis following DLI did not require induction of clinically significant GVHD.

Comparison of the effect of DLI according to cell sources in relapsed AML after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

For relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is an effective therapy. However, the cell source of DLI remains a topic of debate. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of G-CSF mobilized cells (G-DLI) with conventionally collected DLI (C-DLI). A total of 81 patients (50 C-DLI vs. 31 G-DLI) were assessed for clinical outcomes. There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups including AML risk, donor types, interval from relapse to DLI, and infused CD3+ cell count. Although not statistically significant, complete remission (CR) and chimerism conversion rates were higher in G-DLI than in C-DLI: 51.6% vs. 28.0%, P = 0.057 and 42.3% vs. 28.2%, P = 0.363, respectively. There was no difference in acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) incidence and severity of acute GVHD between the two groups. The median overall survival (OS) of the G-DLI and C-DLI groups was 139 days and 106 days, respectively (P = 0.58). In conclusion, G-DLI appears to be a safe and an equally efficacious substitute for C-DLI, which is more readily available.

Donor lymphocyte infusions after haploidentical stem cell transplantation with PTCY: A study on behalf of the EBMT cellular therapy & immunobiology working party.

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is a treatment option to prevent or treat relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We here report data for 173 patients who received one or multiple DLIs after haploidentical-HCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) at 47 EBMT centers from 2009 to 2018. Indication for DLI was: prophylactic for 59 (34.3%), preemptive for 20(11.6%), and therapeutic for 93(54.1%). For the prophylactic group, the median number of DLIs was 1 (IQR:1-2.5) with a median first dose of 0.1 × 106 CD3+ T cell/kg, for the preemptive 2 (IQR:1-3) with 0.5 × 106 CD3+ T cell/kg, for the therapeutic 1 (IQR:1-3) with 1 × 106CD3+ Tcell/kg, respectively. OS after first DLI was 61% (46-75%) for prophylactic, 40% (19-61%) for preemptive, and 22% (13-31%) for therapeutic. CI of II-IV aGVHD and cGVHD was 17% (7-27%) and 53% (40-67%) for the prophylactic, 20% (2-38%) and 21% (3-39%) for the preemptive, 17% (9-24%) and 24% (15-33%) for the therapeutic group, respectively. Our data show great variability in the indications and modalities of DLI across responding EBMT centers. Survival rates remain relatively low in patients with active disease. While the cumulative incidence of aGVHD appears acceptable, we showed a high incidence of cGVHD in the prophylactic group, compared with preemptive and therapeutic DLI. These data should be investigated further in prospective clinical trials.

Combining blinatumomab and donor lymphocyte infusion in B-ALL patients relapsing after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a study of the SFGM-TC.

Relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) still represents a major concern with poor outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) versus blinatumomab alone in this setting. This is a multicenter retrospective study from centers of SFGM-TC. All transplanted patients who received blinatumomab salvage therapy were included. Patients who received DLI from 1 month before to 100 days after the starting of blinatumomab were included in the blina-DLI group. Seventy-two patients were included. Medium follow-up was 38 months. Fifty received blinatumomab alone and 22 the association blinatumomab-DLI. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 31% in the blinatumomab group and 43% in the blinatumomab-DLI group (p = 0.31). Studying DLI as a time dependent variable, PFS did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (HR:0.7, 95% CI: 0.4-1.5). In multivariate analysis, DLI was not a prognostic factor for OS, progression-free survival and progression/relapse incidence. Adverse events and graft-versus-disease rates were comparable in the 2 groups. In conclusion, adding DLI between 1 month before and 100 days after start of blinatumomab is safe and does not seem to improve outcomes in B-ALL patients who relapsed after allo-HCT.

Spectral flow cytometry cluster analysis of therapeutic donor lymphocyte infusions identifies T cell subsets associated with outcome in patients with AML relapse.

Identification of immune phenotypes linked to durable graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) response following donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) is of high clinical relevance. In this prospective observational study of 13 AML relapse patients receiving therapeutic DLI, we longitudinally investigated changes in differentiation stages and exhaustion markers of T cell subsets using cluster analysis of 30-color spectral flow cytometry during 24 months follow-up. DLI cell products and patient samples after DLI were analyzed and correlated to the clinical outcome. Analysis of DLI cell products revealed heterogeneity in the proportions of naïve and antigen experienced T cells. Cell products containing lower levels of effector memory (eff/m) cells and higher amounts of naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were associated with long-term remission. Furthermore, investigation of patient blood samples early after DLI showed that patients relapsing during the study period, had higher levels of CD4+ eff/m T cells and expressed a mosaic of surface molecules implying an exhausted functional state. Of note, this observation preceded the clinical diagnosis of relapse by five months. On the other hand, patients with continuous remission retained lower levels of exhausted CD4+ eff/m T cells more than four months post DLI. Moreover, lower frequencies of exhausted CD8+ eff/m T cells as well as higher amounts of CD4+temra CD45RO+ T cells were present in this group. These results imply the formation of functional long-term memory pool of T cells. Finally, unbiased sample analysis showed that DLI cell products with low levels of eff/m cells both in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subpopulations associate with a lower relapse incidence. Additionally, competing risk analysis of patient samples taken early after DLI revealed that patients with high amounts of exhausted CD4+ eff/m T cells in their blood exhibited significantly higher rates of relapse. In conclusion, differentially activated T cell clusters, both in the DLI product and in patients post infusion, were associated with AML relapse after DLI. Our study suggests that differences in DLI cell product composition might influence GVL. In-depth monitoring of T cell dynamics post DLI might increase safety and efficacy of this immunotherapy, while further studies are needed to assess the functionality of T cells found in the DLI.