Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 46
Filtrar
1.
ABCS health sci ; 48: e023304, 14 fev. 2023. ilus, tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1518577

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Bone marrow transplants primarily depend on people who previously registered to be donors. From then on, the search for compatibility between donor and recipient begins. OBJECTIVE: To describe the historical landmarks and the legal apparatus of bone marrow donor banks in Brazil based on an integrative review. METHODS: LILACS database and PubMed and SciELO journals were used. The term bone marrow transplantation was the descriptor. Eligibility criteria were: articles with the theme of Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT) and studies carried out on the national territory. RESULTS: A total of 88,855 articles were identified, among which 185 met the eligibility criteria. After they were thoroughly read, 14 articles were selected. The studies pointed out fragments that dealt with important historical landmarks for the establishment of bone marrow transplantation as a conventional treatment for oncohematological diseases. CONCLUSION: The use of BMT has a history of more than thirty years in Brazil. However, none of the articles identified specifically addresses the historical content of bone marrow transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Donantes de Tejidos , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/historia , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trasplante de Células Madre , Brasil
2.
Bull Cancer ; 106(1S): S83-S91, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30528618

RESUMEN

JACIE (Joint Accreditation Committee ISTC EBMT) regulations and standards impose a quality and safety requirement for graft reinjection by nurses. However, the standards do not provide a step-by-step graft reinjection procedure. Because of high medical team turnover, the opening of new transplant centers, and continual questions from colleagues trying to decipher the JACIE standards, the need for a specific procedure goes without saying. We collected graft reinjection procedures from each SFGM-TC center that participated in our survey, thus creating an inventory of the different steps that make up graft reinjection. In addition to reviewing the main regulatory texts and JACIE standards, we sought advice from medical and cellular therapy experts. We observed that most centers use a mix of practices and some unjustified practices. In some transplant units, it is still standard practice to defrost cell therapy products in the transplant unit. Caregivers are aware of the need for a rigorous application of the regulatory requirements and are willing to administer a procedure that provides specific steps for each stage of the process. In this workshop, we questioned each stage of the graft reinjection procedure, which helped us define clear methods of implementation. In the form of a checklist, we offer bone marrow and stem cell transplant units a step-by-step procedure.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea/normas , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/normas , Retratamiento/normas , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/métodos , Criopreservación , Francia , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Humanos , Sistemas de Identificación de Pacientes/métodos , Premedicación/métodos , Premedicación/normas , Retratamiento/efectos adversos , Retratamiento/métodos , Sociedades Médicas , Temperatura
3.
Lancet ; 391(10123): 883-910, 2018 03 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28987452
4.
Turk J Haematol ; 34(4): 321-327, 2017 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27476890

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Obtaining informed consent from hematopoietic stem cell recipients and donors is a critical step in the transplantation process. Anxiety may affect their understanding of the provided information. However, use of audiovisual methods may facilitate understanding. In this prospective randomized study, we investigated the effectiveness of using an audiovisual method of providing information to patients and donors in combination with the standard model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 10-min informational animation was prepared for this purpose. In total, 82 participants were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 received the additional audiovisual information and group 2 received standard information. A 20-item questionnaire was administered to participants at the end of the informational session. RESULTS: A reliability test and factor analysis showed that the questionnaire was reliable and valid. For all participants, the mean overall satisfaction score was 184.8±19.8 (maximum possible score of 200). However, for satisfaction with information about written informed consent, group 1 scored significantly higher than group 2 (p=0.039). Satisfaction level was not affected by age, education level, or differences between the physicians conducting the informative session. CONCLUSION: This study shows that using audiovisual tools may contribute to a better understanding of the informed consent procedure and potential risks of stem cell transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre , Donantes de Tejidos/educación , Receptores de Trasplantes/educación , Grabación en Video , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Trasplante de Células Madre/legislación & jurisprudencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Donantes de Tejidos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Receptores de Trasplantes/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adulto Joven
5.
Bull Cancer ; 103(11S): S207-S212, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27855949

RESUMEN

Informed consent is not restricted to clinical research and must be applied to high-risk care such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. If standardized informed consent might improve inequalities in medical practices between different transplantation centers, it is strongly recommended that it be adapted with an honest dialogue between physicians and patients and physicians and donors. In an attempt to harmonize clinical practices among French hematopoietic stem cell transplantation centers, the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) held its sixth annual workshop series in September 2015 in Lille. This event brought together practitioners from across the country. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the French law concerning patients' rights and ethical practices for an informed consent process to be applied to care or research.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos , Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto , Consentimiento Informado , Discusiones Bioéticas , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/ética , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos/ética , Comunicación , Francia , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/ética , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/ética , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Relaciones Médico-Paciente/ética , Sociedades Médicas , Donantes de Tejidos/ética , Donantes de Tejidos/legislación & jurisprudencia
6.
Eur J Health Law ; 23(1): 61-79, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27044172

RESUMEN

It is widely accepted that younger children can act as saviour siblings by donating cord blood or bone marrow to their gravely-ill brothers or sisters. However, it is under dispute whether these procedures are in the best interests of the child. This article suggests that parents may be relying on a thinly-veiled interfamilial approach, where the wider benefit to the whole family is used to justify the procedure to the Human Tissue Authority in the United Kingdom. This article suggests that the merging of familial interests to validate a non-therapeutic bone marrow harvest on a child forces altruism in a patient too young to understand, rendering the harvests unlawful under current law.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea/legislación & jurisprudencia , Protección a la Infancia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre del Cordón Umbilical/legislación & jurisprudencia , Hermanos , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/ética , Niño , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre del Cordón Umbilical/ética , Humanos , Reino Unido
7.
J Health Econ ; 33: 43-56, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24240145

RESUMEN

Many U.S. states have passed legislation providing leave to organ and bone marrow donors and/or tax benefits for live and deceased organ and bone marrow donations and to employers of donors. We exploit cross-state variation in the timing of such legislation to analyze its impact on organ donations by living and deceased persons, on measures of the quality of the transplants, and on the number of bone marrow donations. We find that these provisions do not have a significant impact on the quantity of organs donated. The leave laws, however, do have a positive impact on bone marrow donations, and the effect increases with the size of the population of beneficiaries and with the generosity of the legislative provisions. Our results suggest that this legislation works for moderately invasive procedures such as bone marrow donation, but these incentives may be too low for organ donation, which is riskier and more burdensome.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea/legislación & jurisprudencia , Ausencia por Enfermedad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Impuestos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/economía , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Política de Salud , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Hígado/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Trasplante de Órganos/economía , Trasplante de Órganos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trasplante de Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/economía , Gobierno Estatal , Impuestos/economía , Donantes de Tejidos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/economía , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
11.
Med Law Rev ; 19(3): 372-400, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21849566

RESUMEN

Bone marrow donation between siblings is a common medical procedure. In some instances, the donor will be a young child incapable of providing either consent or assent, and the intervention is made lawful through the consent of the parent(s). Although a number of justifications have been formulated to cover this act with legitimacy, these fail to describe accurately the transaction that takes place. In the absence of the child authorising his parents to act as his proxy, it is unclear why parental consent is sufficient to permit the redistribution of his biological wealth. Instead, where the donor is such a young child, the whole procedure may be construed as the appropriation of bodily tissue from one unconsenting human and its conveyance to a third, albeit related, party. This paper argues that if the parentally authorised transfer of biological material from an unconsenting human to another is legally permissible, it must be on the basis of an implicitly acknowledged property right in the child.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea/legislación & jurisprudencia , Propiedad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Consentimiento Paterno/legislación & jurisprudencia , Preescolar , Humanos , Reino Unido
15.
Cell Stem Cell ; 2(6): 529-33, 2008 Jun 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18522846

RESUMEN

Human embryonic stem cell research has elicited powerful debates about the morality of destroying human embryos. However, there are important ethical issues related to stem cell research that are unrelated to embryo destruction. These include particular issues involving different types of cells used, the procurement of such cells, in vivo use of stem cells, intellectual property, and conflicts of interest.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea/ética , Investigaciones con Embriones/ética , Ética en Investigación , Animales , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos/ética , Conflicto de Intereses , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre del Cordón Umbilical/ética , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre del Cordón Umbilical/legislación & jurisprudencia , Investigaciones con Embriones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Embrión de Mamíferos , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/ética , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Patentes como Asunto , Trasplante de Células Madre/ética
16.
J Health Polit Policy Law ; 32(5): 785-818, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17855717

RESUMEN

Beginning in the late 1980s, many health insurers refused to cover high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplant (HDC/ABMT) for high-risk and metastatic breast cancer patients. Insurers denied coverage because there was no persuasive evidence of clinical effectiveness. In response, many women sued to compel coverage. After years of litigation and the expenditure of approximately $3 billion, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) showed that the procedure was no more effective and possibly more harmful than conventional therapy. To understand whether and how litigation contributed to the diffusion of the procedure, we conducted a series of case studies that examine the litigation tactics and strategies used by defense and plaintiffs' counsel. Despite the fact that HDC/ABMT lacked proven scientific effectiveness, insurance defense attorneys were unable to stop the procedure's diffusion. Plaintiffs' attorneys had a much easier and more sympathetic story to tell and were able to exploit vulnerabilities facing the defense.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/economía , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/economía , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cobertura del Seguro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/legislación & jurisprudencia , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Difusión de Innovaciones , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...