Worldwide organization and structures for kidney transplantation services.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation (KT) is the preferred modality of kidney replacement therapy with better patient outcomes and quality of life compared with dialytic therapies. This study aims to evaluate the epidemiology, accessibility and availability of KT services in countries and regions around the world. METHODS: This study relied on data from an international survey of relevant stakeholders (clinicians, policymakers and patient advocates) from countries affiliated with the International Society of Nephrology that was conducted from July to September 2022. Survey questions related to the availability, access, donor type and cost of KT. RESULTS: In total, 167 countries responded to the survey. KT services were available in 70% of all countries, including 86% of high-income countries, but only 21% of low-income countries. In 80% of countries, access to KT was greater in adults than in children. The median global prevalence of KT was 279.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 58.0-492.0] per million people (pmp) and the median global incidence was 12.2 (IQR 3.0-27.8) pmp. Pre-emptive KT remained exclusive to high- and upper-middle-income countries, and living donor KT was the only available modality for KT in low-income countries. The median cost of the first year of KT was $26 903 USD and varied 1000-fold between the most and least expensive countries. CONCLUSION: The availability, access and affordability of KT services, especially in low-income countries, remain limited. There is an exigent need to identify strategies to ensure equitable access to KT services for people with kidney failure worldwide, especially in the low-income countries.

Benefits of Living Over Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in Elderly Recipients. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of a Large European Registry Cohort.

Although kidney transplantation from living donors (LD) offers better long-term results than from deceased donors (DD), elderly recipients are less likely to receive LD transplants than younger ones. We analyzed renal transplant outcomes from LD versus DD in elderly recipients with a propensity-matched score. This retrospective, observational study included the first single kidney transplants in recipients aged ≥65 years from two European registry cohorts (2013-2020, n = 4,257). Recipients of LD (n = 408), brain death donors (BDD, n = 3,072), and controlled cardiocirculatory death donors (cDCD, n = 777) were matched for donor and recipient age, sex, dialysis time and recipient diabetes. Major graft and patient outcomes were investigated. Unmatched analyses showed that LD recipients were more likely to be transplanted preemptively and had shorter dialysis times than any DD type. The propensity score matched Cox's regression analysis between LD and BDD (387-pairs) and LD and cDCD (259-pairs) revealing a higher hazard ratio for graft failure with BDD (2.19 [95% CI: 1.16-4.15], p = 0.016) and cDCD (3.38 [95% CI: 1.79-6.39], p < 0.001). One-year eGFR was higher in LD transplants than in BDD and cDCD recipients. In elderly recipients, LD transplantation offers superior graft survival and renal function compared to BDD or cDCD. This strategy should be further promoted to improve transplant outcomes.

Seasonal Patterns of Living Kidney Donation in the United States From 1995 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: The number of living kidney donors in the United States has declined since 2005, with variations based on the donor-recipient relationship. The reasons for this decline are unclear, and strategies to mitigate declined donations remain elusive. We examined the change in donor number monthly (within-year) versus annually (between-years) to inform potentially modifiable factors for future interventions. METHODS: In this registry-based cohort analysis of 141 759 living kidney donors between 1995 and 2019, we used linear mixed-effects models for donor number per month and year to analyze between-year and within-year variation in donation. We used Poisson regression to quantify the change in the number of donors per season before and after 2005, stratified by donor-recipient relationship and zip-code household income tertile. RESULTS: We observed a consistent summer surge in donations during June, July, and August. This surge was statistically significant for related donors (incidence rate ratio [IRR] range: 1.12-1.33) and unrelated donors (IRR range: 1.06-1.16) across donor income tertiles. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate lower rates of living kidney donation in non-summer months across income tertiles. Interventions are needed to address barriers to donation in non-summer seasons and facilitate donations throughout the year. Since the Organ Donor Leave Law provides a solid foundation for supporting year-round donation, extending the law's provisions beyond federal employees may mitigate identified seasonal barriers.

Thirty-Year Trends in Perioperative Mortality Risk for Living Kidney Donors.

This study uses a national registry study to characterize temporal trends in perioperative mortality in donors and risk factors associated with this event.

Estatística geral de doação e transplantes de orgãos - Goiás - 2024 (Janeiro a julho) / General statistics on organ donation and transplants - Goiás - 2024 (January to June)

Estatística geral de doação e transplantes de orgãos - Goiás que tem como objetivos transcrever em números os resultados de todo o trabalho executado pela Gerência de Transplantes em Goiás

General statistics on organ donation and transplants - Goiás, which aims to transcribe into numbers the results of all the work carried out by the Transplant Management in Goiás

Predictors of academic delay post-pediatric kidney transplant in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients with kidney failure often experience cognitive delays. However, academic delay (being more than one grade level below age-appropriate grade, or in special education) after pediatric kidney transplantation (KTx) has not been explored. We sought to identify patient characteristics associated with a higher risk of academic delay 1 year post-KTx. METHODS: We used the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database to identify children aged 6-17 years who received a primary KTx between 2014 and 2021 and had a functioning graft 1 year after KTx. The primary outcome was the patient's academic progress at 1 year post-transplant. The secondary outcome was change in academic progress between transplant and 1-year follow-up: onset of new delay, resolution of pre-existing delay, persistence of delay, or no delay at either timepoint. Binomial and multinomial mixed effects logistic regression models were used to predict each outcome based on patient characteristics. RESULTS: The study included 2197 patients, of whom 14% demonstrated academic delay at 1 year post-KTx, 4% demonstrated a new onset of academic delay, 5% demonstrated a resolution of academic delay, and 10% demonstrated persistent academic delay. Patients undergoing transplantation at a younger age, receiving a deceased donor kidney, experiencing longer waitlist times, and undergoing KTx for vascular or other disease indications for KTx were more likely to experience academic delays, including new-onset academic delays. CONCLUSIONS: Academic delays are frequently reported among pediatric KTx recipients. Additional academic support may help resolving or preventing academic delay for at-risk subgroups of children undergoing KTx.

Kidney transplantation access and outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and young adults, 1963-2020: an ANZDATA registry study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess differences between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous Australian children and young adults in access to and outcomes of kidney transplantation. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort study based on prospectively collected data; analysis of Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) data. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Children and young adults aged 0-24 years who commenced kidney replacement therapy in Australia during 1963-2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of children and young adults who received kidney transplants within five years of commencing dialysis; 5- and 10-year death-censored graft survival; and 5- and 10-year survival of children and young adults who received kidney transplants or who remained on dialysis. RESULTS: During 1963-2020, 3736 children and young adults received kidney replacement therapy in Australia: 213 (5.8%) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and 3523 (94.2%) non-Indigenous children and young adults. During follow-up (median, eight years; interquartile range [IQR], 2.6-15 years), 2762 children and young adults received kidney transplants: 93 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (43.7% of those receiving kidney replacement therapy) and 2669 non-Indigenous children and young adults (75.8%). Smaller proportions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander than of non-Indigenous children and young adults received transplants within five years of commencing dialysis (99, 46% v 2924, 83.0%), received living donor transplants (19, 20% v 1170, 43.9%), or underwent pre-emptive transplantation (one, 1.1% v 363, 13.6%). Five-year graft survival for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander recipients was similar to non-Indigenous recipients (61% v 75%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-2.05), but 10-year graft survival was lower (35% v 61%; aHR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.25-2.28). Five- and 10-year survival after kidney transplantation was similar for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous people. Among those who remained on dialysis, 10-year survival was poorer for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander than non-Indigenous children and young adults (aHR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.08-2.10). CONCLUSIONS: Five-year graft and recipient survival were excellent for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and young adults who received kidney transplants; however, a lower proportion received transplants within five years of dialysis initiation, than non-Indigenous children and young adults. Improving transplant access within five years of dialysis commencement should be a priority.

Potential kidney donors among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and a termination of resuscitation rule.

IMPORTANCE: Uncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death (uDCD) has been developed and can serve as a source of kidneys for transplantation, especially when considering patients that meet extended criteria donation (ECD). OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the theorical size and characteristics of the potential pool of kidney transplants from uDCD with standard criteria donation (SCD) and ECD among patients who meet Termination of Resuscitation (TOR) criteria following Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA). METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS: This study focused on adult patients experiencing unexpected OHCA, who were prospectively enrolled in the Parisian registry from May 16th, 2011, to December 31st, 2020. RESULTS: During the study period, EMS attempted resuscitation for 19,976 OHCA patients, of which 64.5% (12,890) had no return of spontaneous circulation. Among them, 47.4% (9,461) had TOR criteria, representing no chance of survival, and from them, 8.8% (1,764) met SCD criteria and could be potential organ donors and 33.6% (6,720) met ECD for kidney donors. The mean potential number per year of uDCD candidates with SCD and ECD remain stable respectively around 98 (±10.8) and 672 (±103.8) cases per year. Elderly patients (≥65 y.o.) represented 61.2% (n = 5,763/9,461) of patients who met TOR and 100% (5763/5763) of patients who could have matched both ECD criteria and TOR. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Implementing uDCD program including SCD and ECD for kidney transplantation among OHCA cases quickly identified by the TOR, holds significant potential to substantially broaden the pool of organ donors. These programs could offer a viable solution to address the pressing burden of kidney shortage, particularly benefiting elderly recipients who may otherwise face prolonged waiting times and limited access to suitable organs.

Body mass index in pediatric kidney transplant selection criteria.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with increased complications, rejection, and graft loss after kidney transplantation in adult and pediatric recipients. Elevated body mass index (BMI) is a common contraindication to transplant at adult kidney transplant programs; however, there is no data on such limitations for pediatric patients. METHODS: Between October and December 2022, we conducted a survey of Pediatric Nephrology Research Consortium centers assessing the use of BMI in pediatric kidney transplant evaluation. Centers reporting utilization of BMI cutoffs were invited to submit patient-level data on children declined for active transplant listing due to BMI. RESULTS: Thirty-nine centers responded to the survey (42% response rate); 51% include BMI in their written listing criteria, with a median BMI "cutoff" of 39 kg/m2 (range 30-50 kg/m2). Between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, 30 children at 15 transplant centers were declined for listing status due to BMI. Patient-level data was provided for 19 children (63%) who were denied active listing status; median BMI was 42 kg/m2 (range 35.8-49.4 kg/m2) and 84% were on dialysis. One year after evaluation, seven patients (37%) had proceeded to active wait list status. Eight (42%) remained in inactive status and four (21%) were unlisted; ten of these 12 patients (83%) were on dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of BMI in pediatric kidney transplant evaluation and listing varies among centers, but BMI limits access to transplant for some children. More information is needed on the outcomes of obese pediatric kidney candidates who are and are not transplanted, to guide development of national and international consensus.

The survival benefit of deceased donor kidney transplantation for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, 2006-20: a retrospective national cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the survival benefit of kidney transplantation for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people waitlisted for deceased donor kidney transplantation in Australia. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study; analysis of linked data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) registry, the Australia and New Zealand Organ Donation (ANZOD) registry, and OrganMatch (Australian Red Cross). SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: All adult Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (18 years or older) who commenced dialysis in Australia during 1 July 2006 - 31 December 2020 and were included in the kidney-only deceased donor transplant waiting list. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival benefit of deceased donor kidney transplantation relative to remaining on dialysis. RESULTS: Of the 4082 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who commenced dialysis, 450 were waitlisted for kidney transplants (11%), of whom 323 received deceased donor transplants. Transplantation was associated with a significant survival benefit compared with remaining on dialysis after the first 12 months (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.73). This benefit was similar to that for waitlisted non-Indigenous people who received deceased donor kidney transplants (adjusted HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.40-0.57; Indigenous status interaction: P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: From twelve months post-transplantation, deceased donor transplantation provides a survival benefit for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Our findings provide evidence that supports efforts to promote the waitlisting of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who are otherwise eligible for transplantation.

The Medical Costs of Determining Eligibility and Waiting for a Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Recent efforts to increase access to kidney transplant (KTx) in the United States include increasing referrals to transplant programs, leading to more pretransplant services. Transplant programs reconcile the costs of these services through the Organ Acquisition Cost Center (OACC). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the costs associated with pretransplant services by applying microeconomic methods to OACC costs reported by transplant hospitals. RESEARCH DESIGN, SUBJECTS, AND MEASURES: For all US adult kidney transplant hospitals from 2013 through 2018 (n=193), we crosslinked the total OACC costs (at the hospital-fiscal year level) to proxy measures of volumes of pretransplant services. We used a multiple-output cost function, regressing total OACC costs against proxy measures for volumes of pretransplant services and adjusting for patient characteristics, to calculate the marginal cost of each pretransplant service. RESULTS: Over 1015 adult hospital-years, median OACC costs attributable to the pretransplant services were $5 million. Marginal costs for the pretransplant services were: initial transplant evaluation, $9k per waitlist addition; waitlist management, $2k per patient-year on the waitlist; deceased donor offer management, $1k per offer; living donor evaluation, procurement and follow-up: $26k per living donor. Longer time on dialysis among patients added to the waitlist was associated with higher OACC costs at the transplant hospital. CONCLUSIONS: To achieve the policy goals of more access to KTx, sufficient funding is needed to support the increase in volume of pretransplant services. Future studies should assess the relative value of each service and explore ways to enhance efficiency.

Differences in Racial and Ethnic Disparities Between First and Repeat Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest patients with graft failure had better access to repeat kidney transplantation (re-KT) than transplant-naive dialysis accessing first KT. This was postulated to be because of better familiarity with the transplant process and healthcare system; whether this advantage is equitably distributed is not known. We compared the magnitude of racial/ethnic disparities in access to re-KT versus first KT. METHODS: Using United States Renal Data System, we identified 104 454 White, Black, and Hispanic patients with a history of graft failure from 1995 to 2018, and 2 357 753 transplant-naive dialysis patients. We used adjusted Cox regression to estimate disparities in access to first and re-KT and whether the magnitude of these disparities differed between first and re-KT using a Wald test. RESULTS: Black patients had inferior access to both waitlisting and receiving first KT and re-KT. However, the racial/ethnic disparities in waitlisting for (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.80) and receiving re-KT (aHR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.58-0.64) was greater than the racial/ethnic disparities in first KT (waitlisting: aHR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93; Pinteraction = 0.001; KT: aHR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.64-0.72; Pinteraction < 0.001). For Hispanic patients, ethnic disparities in waitlisting for re-KT (aHR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79-0.88) were greater than for first KT (aHR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.11-1.16; Pinteraction  < 0.001). However, the disparity in receiving re-KT (aHR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.72-0.80) was similar to that for first KT (aHR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.79; Pinteraction  = 0.55). Inferences were similar when restricting the cohorts to the Kidney Allocation System era. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike White patients, Black and Hispanic patients with graft failure do not experience improved access to re-KT. This suggests that structural and systemic barriers likely persist for racialized patients accessing re-KT, and systemic changes are needed to achieve transplant equity.

A comparison of the epidemiology of kidney replacement therapy between Europe and the United States: 2021 data of the ERA Registry and the USRDS.

BACKGROUND: This paper compares the most recent data on the incidence and prevalence of kidney replacement therapy (KRT), kidney transplantation rates, and mortality on KRT from Europe to those from the United States (US), including comparisons of treatment modalities (haemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and kidney transplantation (KTx)). METHODS: Data were derived from the annual reports of the European Renal Association (ERA) Registry and the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). The European data include information from national and regional renal registries providing the ERA Registry with individual patient data. Additional analyses were performed to present results for all participating European countries together. RESULTS: In 2021, the KRT incidence in the US (409.7 per million population (pmp)) was almost 3-fold higher than in Europe (144.4 pmp). Despite the substantial difference in KRT incidence, approximately the same proportion of patients initiated HD (Europe: 82%, US: 84%), PD (14%; 13%, respectively), or underwent pre-emptive KTx (4%; 3%, respectively). The KRT prevalence in the US (2436.1 pmp) was 2-fold higher than in Europe (1187.8 pmp). Within Europe, approximately half of all prevalent patients were living with a functioning graft (47%), while in the US, this was one third (32%). The number of kidney transplantations performed was almost twice as high in the US (77.0 pmp) compared to Europe (41.6 pmp). The mortality of patients receiving KRT was 1.6-fold higher in the US (157.3 per 1000 patient years) compared to Europe (98.7 per 1000 patient years). CONCLUSIONS: The US had a much higher KRT incidence, prevalence, and mortality compared to Europe, and despite a higher kidney transplantation rate, a lower proportion of prevalent patients with a functioning graft.