RESUMEN
This article describes the 1-year follow-up of a study into the effectiveness of Schema Therapy (ST) for borderline personality disorder (BPD) and comorbid alcohol use disorder (AUD). In the original study, 20 of these patients participated in a multiple baseline case series design study. The results of the original study were promising (a significant decrease of BPD and AUD symptoms). The present study is aimed at examining the longer term benefits of ST for BPD and comorbid AUD. One year after the cessation of the investigational therapy, 17 of the original participants agreed to participate in this follow-up study. T- or Wilcoxon signed rank tests were performed to compare 1-year follow-up to start of therapy (baseline). The results suggest that the main therapeutic improvements were generally preserved at 1-year follow-up. These findings add to the idea that integrated ST for BPD and comorbid AUD might be effective, also in the long term. A randomized clinical trial is indicated to substantiate this idea.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Humanos , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/psicología , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Adulto , Masculino , Alcoholismo/terapia , Alcoholismo/psicología , Alcoholismo/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Comorbilidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To synthesise qualitative research on individuals diagnosed with (or reportedly showing traits of) borderline pattern personality disorder who underwent dialectical behaviour therapy, aiming to comprehend their perceptions of change processes and the therapy's effects. METHOD: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple online databases and grey literature sources. Papers were quality appraised using an adapted version of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. A metaethnographic approach was employed during the synthesis. RESULTS: Eleven studies met criteria for inclusion in the review. The main themes identified through the synthesis process were the impact of DBT, the supportive structure and the 1:1 therapy component. CONCLUSIONS: The synthesis uncovered the importance of various processes within DBT that patients perceived as active ingredients for their change. Many of these processes aligned with proposed theoretical processes of change and quantitative research on DBT's effectiveness.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Terapia Conductual Dialéctica , Humanos , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/psicología , Terapia Conductual Dialéctica/métodos , Investigación Cualitativa , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is considered a disorder of emotion regulation resulting from the expression of a biologically determined emotional vulnerability (that is, heightened sensitivity to emotion, increased emotional intensity/reactivity, and a slow return to emotional baseline) combined with exposure to invalidating environments. Vagal tone has been associated with activity in cortical regions involved in emotion regulation and a lower resting state of vagal tone has been observed in BPD patients relative to healthy controls. Non-invasive transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been shown to reduce temper outbursts in adults with Prader-Willi Syndrome, to enhance recognition of emotions in healthy students, and to improve depressive and anxiety symptoms. Furthermore, a single session of taVNS has been shown to acutely alter the recognition of facial expressions of negative valence in adolescents with MDD and increase emotion recognition in controls. However, the effect of taVNS on emotional vulnerability and regulation in individuals diagnosed with BPD has not been investigated. Our aims are to determine if taVNS is effective in acutely reducing emotional vulnerability and improve emotional regulation in BPD patients. METHODS: Forty-two patients will be randomized to a single session of taVNS or sham-taVNS while going through an affect induction procedure. It will consist of the presentation of one neutral and three negative affect-evoking 4-min-long videos in sequence, each of which is followed by a 4-min post-induction period during which participants will rate the quality and intensity of their current self-reported emotions (post-induction ratings) and the perceived effectiveness in managing their emotions during the video presentation. The rating of the current self-reported emotions will be repeated after every post-induction period (recovery ratings). Mixed models with individuals as random effect will be used to investigate the ratings at each stage of the study, taking into account the repeated measures of the same individuals at baseline, pre-induction, post-induction, and recovery. DISCUSSION: The study has potential to yield new insights into the role of vagal tone in emotion dysregulation in BPD and offer preliminary data on the effectiveness of taVNS as a possible non-invasive brain stimulation to treat a core symptom of BPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05892900. Retrospectively registered on Jun 07, 2023.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Regulación Emocional , Emociones , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio , Estimulación del Nervio Vago , Humanos , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/psicología , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/fisiopatología , Estimulación del Nervio Vago/métodos , Método Simple Ciego , Adulto , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/métodos , Adulto Joven , Femenino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Masculino , Adolescente , Factores de Tiempo , Nervio Vago/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Irritability worsens prognosis and increases mortality in individuals with Attention-Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and/or Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). However, treatment options are still insufficient. The aim of this randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study was to investigate the superiority of a synbiotic over placebo in the management of adults with ADHD and/or BPD and high levels of irritability. The study was conducted between February 2019 and October 2020 at three European clinical centers located in Hungary, Spain and Germany. Included were patients aged 18-65 years old diagnosed with ADHD and/or BPD and high levels of irritability (i.e., an Affectivity Reactivity Index (ARI-S) ≥ 5, plus a Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) score ≥ 4). Subjects were randomized 1(synbiotic):1(placebo); the agent was administered each day, for 10 consecutive weeks. The primary outcome measure was end-of-treatment response (i.e., a reduction ≥ 30 % in the ARI-S total score compared to baseline, plus a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) total score of < 3 (very much, or much improved) at week 10). Between-treatment differences in secondary outcomes, as well as safety were also investigated. Of the 231 included participants, 180 (90:90) were randomized and included in the intention-to-treat-analyses. Of these, 117 (65 %) were females, the mean age was 38 years, ADHD was diagnosed in 113 (63 %), BPD in 44 (24 %), both in 23 (13 %). The synbiotic was well tolerated. At week 10, patients allocated to the synbiotic experienced a significantly higher response rate compared to those allocated to placebo (OR: 0.2, 95 % CI:0.1 to 0.7; P = 0.01). These findings suggest that that (add-on) treatment with a synbiotic may be associated with a clinically meaningful improvement in irritability in, at least, a subgroup of adults with ADHD and/or BPD. A superiority of the synbiotic over placebo in the management of emotional dysregulation (-3.6, 95 % CI:-6.8 to -0.3; P = 0.03), emotional symptoms (-0.6, 95 % CI:-1.2 to -0.05; P = 0.03), inattention (-1.8, 95 % CI: -3.2 to -0.4; P = 0.01), functioning (-2.7, 95 % CI: -5.2 to -0.2; P = 0.03) and perceived stress levels (-0.6, 95 % CI: -1.2 to -0.05; P = 0.03) was also suggested. Higher baseline RANK-L protein levels were associated with a significantly lower response rate, but only in the synbiotic group (OR: 0.1, 95 % CI: -4.3 to - 0.3, P = 0.02). In the placebo group, higher IL-17A levels at baseline were significantly associated with a higher improvement in in particular, emotional dysregulation (P = 0.04), opening a door for new (targeted) drug intervention. However, larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm the findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03495375.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Genio Irritable , Simbióticos , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/terapia , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Simbióticos/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Anciano , España , AlemaniaRESUMEN
Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) is an evidence-based treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD), with findings demonstrating improvements in various BPD features and related behaviours, such as nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI). Theory and research suggest that reductions in emotion dysregulation and interpersonal dysfunction could account for at least some of the reduction in NSSI observed during the course of DBT. The current research investigated: 1) the trajectory of changes in emotion dysregulation, interpersonal dysfunction, and NSSI over the course of DBT, and 2) whether changes in emotion dysregulation mediate the relationship between changes in interpersonal dysfunction and changes in NSSI over treatment. One hundred and twenty individuals with BPD enrolled in a multi-site randomized-clinical trial were assessed at five timepoints over 12 months of standard DBT. Results indicated that interpersonal dysfunction and NSSI decreased over the course of DBT. Emotion dysregulation decreased in a quadratic manner such that most of the gains in emotion dysregulation occurred in earlier phases of DBT. Although changes in interpersonal dysfunction predicted changes in emotion dysregulation, changes in emotion dysregulation did not mediate the relationship between changes in interpersonal dysfunction and changes in NSSI.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Terapia Conductual Dialéctica , Regulación Emocional , Relaciones Interpersonales , Conducta Autodestructiva , Humanos , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/psicología , Conducta Autodestructiva/psicología , Conducta Autodestructiva/terapia , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Regulación Emocional/fisiología , Adulto Joven , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adolescente , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several studies have observed that mentalization-based treatment (MBT) is an effective treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD), but its effectiveness for other personality disorders (PDs) has hardly been examined. Additionally, the evidence supporting the claim that MBT improves mentalizing capacity is scarce. The present study examined whether (i) patients with a broad range of PDs enrolled in an MBT program would improve on several outcome measures (ii) mentalizing capacity would improve over time; (iii) patients with BPD would improve more than those with non-borderline PDs. METHOD: Personality disorders, psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, maladaptive personality functioning and mentalizing capacity were measured in a group of individuals with various PDs (n = 46) that received MBT. Assessments were made at baseline and after 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment. The severity of psychiatric symptoms, measured using the Outcome Questionnaire 45, was the primary outcome variable. RESULTS: Overall, enrollment in the MBT program was associated with a decrease in psychiatric symptoms and an improvement of personality functioning, social functioning for a mixed group of PDs (all p's ≤ .01). Bigger effect sizes were observed for BPD patients (n = 25) than for patients with non-BPD (n = 21), but the difference failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). A primary analysis showed that the decrease in psychiatric symptoms was significant in BPD patients (p = 0.01), not in non-BPD (p = 0.19) patients. However, a sufficiently powered secondary analysis with imputed data showed that non-BPD patients reported a significant decrease in psychiatric symptoms too (p = 0.01). Mentalizing capacity of the whole group improved over time (d = .68 on the Toronto Alexithymia Scale and 1.46 on the Social Cognition and Object Relations System). DISCUSSION: These results suggest that MBT coincides with symptomatic and functional improvement across a broad range of PDs and shows that MBT is associated with improvements in mentalizing capacity. As the study is not experimental in design, we cannot make causal claims. CONCLUSION: Mentalization-based treatment may be an effective treatment for patients with a broad range of PDs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study design was approved by the Leiden University Ethical Committee.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Mentalización , Trastornos de la Personalidad , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Trastornos de la Personalidad/terapia , Trastornos de la Personalidad/psicología , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , Teoría de la MenteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Self-harm and suicidal ideation are prevalent among adolescents, cause physical and psychosocial disability, and have potentially life-threatening consequences. Dialectical behavioral therapy for Adolescents (DBT-A) is an evidence-based intervention for reducing self-harm. However, few studies have investigated the effectiveness of DBT-A when delivered in routine clinical practice. METHODS: A follow-up cohort study, based on data from a quality assessment register of DBT-A in child and adolescent mental health services including seven outpatient clinics. Inclusion criteria were ongoing or a history of self-harming behavior the last 6 months; current suicidal behavior; at least 3 criteria of DSM-IV Borderline personality disorder (BPD), or at least the self-destruction criterion of DSM-IV BPD, in addition to minimum 2 subthreshold criteria; and fluency in Norwegian. Participants received 20 weeks of DBT-A consisting of multifamily skills training groups and individual therapy sessions. Outcomes from 41 participants included frequency of self-harm, suicide attempts and hospitalizations caused by self-harm or suicide attempts, assessed pre-, during, and post-treatment by self-report and reviews of the patient's medical records. Suicidal ideation, urge to self-harm and perceived feelings of happiness and sadness were assessed by the patients' diary cards at week 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 of the treatment program. RESULTS: Participants attended an average of 17.9 (SD = 4.7) individual sessions, 14.7 (SD = 3.4) group-based skills training sessions and 4.6 (SD = 4.1) brief intersession telephone consultations. Moderate to large within-group effect sizes (ES) were found in self-harm from pre-treatment to 1-5 weeks (d = 0.64), 6-10 weeks (d = 0.84), 11-15 weeks (d = 0.99), 16-20 weeks (d = 1.26) and post-treatment (d = 1.68). Nine participants were admitted to hospitalization during DBT-A, whereas five had attempted suicide, but no suicides were completed. No statistically significant changes were found in suicidal ideation, urge to self-harm or perceived feelings of happiness or sadness from pre to post treatment. CONCLUSION: The findings of the current study are promising as the participants reported considerably reduced self-harm behavior after DBT-A treatment in a child and adolescent mental health outpatient setting.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Terapia Conductual Dialéctica , Conducta Autodestructiva , Ideación Suicida , Intento de Suicidio , Humanos , Adolescente , Femenino , Terapia Conductual Dialéctica/métodos , Masculino , Conducta Autodestructiva/terapia , Conducta Autodestructiva/psicología , Intento de Suicidio/psicología , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de Seguimiento , NiñoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Severe shame is a distressing negative emotion, accompanied by intense feelings of worthlessness that contributes to a broad panoply of psychological disorders. This study aimed to compare the effects on shame dysregulation of two transdiagnostic treatments, the Unified Protocol (UP) and Self-Acceptance Group Therapy (SAGT). We additionally addressed the question of whether borderline personality disorder (BPD) can properly be regarded as an emotional disorder. The focus was on outcome measures, primarily shame that cut across individual diagnostic categories and capture emotional dysfunction broadly conceived. METHODS: Individuals suffering from a range of emotional disorders (including BPD) and high levels of shame were randomly allocated to treatment by either UP (N = 280) or SAGT (N = 282). Outcomes were measures of emotion dysfunction-shame, loneliness, neuroticism, emotional dysregulation, positive and negative affect-measured pre-treatment, post-treatment and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. RESULTS: UP was superior to SAGT in showing better post-treatment retention of therapeutic gains on all outcome measures over the 6-month follow-up period. Compared with those without a BPD diagnosis, those diagnosed with BPD showed significantly higher neuroticism and emotion dysregulation at baseline and a similar post-treatment reduction in almost all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the use of both the UP and SAGT in the treatment of severe shame. The superiority of the UP over SAGT in reducing negative emotionality is interpreted in terms of the specific mechanisms targeted by the UP. The results provide support for the theoretical rationale for the UP as a treatment for dysregulated shame and for emotional dysfunction generally.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Psicoterapia de Grupo , Vergüenza , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Psicoterapia de Grupo/métodos , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Despite evidence validating the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in youth, specifically showing persistence of BPD symptoms and morbidity similar to adults, there is reluctance to diagnose this in teens. Further, there is a belief among many trainees and academic child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAPs) that only specialty programs are effective, leading to treatment delays. This study charts the impact of a full-day workshop offered to an entire academic CAP department. METHODS: A Good Psychiatric Management for Adolescent (GPM-A) Borderline Personality Disorder in-person workshop was offered to department members. Participants were asked to complete a pre-survey, an immediate post-training survey, and a survey at 6 months post-training. Utilizing a Qualtrics questionnaire, both linear mixed-effect models and paired t-tests were used to estimate the immediate and sustained effects of the training. RESULTS: Thirty-two participants completed the workshop, with 31 answering the pre-survey, 27 the post-training survey, and 23 the 6-month follow-up survey. Immediately after the training and 6 months later, participants demonstrated statistically significant (p < .05) improvements in willingness to disclose the diagnosis of BPD, a reduced negative attitude around BPD, and an enhanced sense of confidence in addressing the needs of adolescents with BPD. CONCLUSIONS: GPM-A training can make a positive impact on groups of clinicians who work with youth who meet criteria for BPD, specifically reducing stigma, encouraging trainees and faculty members to make the diagnosis more readily, and helping them feel more competent in addressing the treatment needs of adolescents with BPD.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Humanos , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Adolescente , Femenino , Masculino , Psiquiatría del Adolescente/educación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , EducaciónRESUMEN
Interpersonal hypersensitivity (IHS) is a core organizing concept of Good Psychiatric Management, a generalist treatment for borderline personality disorder (BPD) that relies on basic tools most clinicians already employ yet is informed by an organized and evidence-based framework, developed for dissemination in various mental health care settings. We work in an inpatient psychiatric unit that specializes in the management of suicidal crises at the University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland. Because we see numerous patients with previously undiagnosed BPD during their first hospitalization, we have developed techniques and instruments to promote efficient and easy-to-implement psychoeducation. In this article, we propose a practical and user-friendly measure of IHS that is well-suited for use by multidisciplinary inpatient staff or outpatient nursing-based staff, the IHS Ruler, which is based on a visual analog scale. It is a pragmatic tool for preliminary psychoeducation for patients with BPD and their caregivers. Its ease of use and structured way of presenting the inner experience of these patients in relation to their current interpersonal environment allows caregivers to establish a framework for internal reflection and sharing, discuss the causes of current transactions, and illuminate larger patterns in the causes of the patient's crises. Ultimately, this process can help patients and the clinical staff supporting them anticipate future problems.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Humanos , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Adulto , SuizaRESUMEN
Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is widely acknowledged as an effective treatment for individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD). However, the optimal treatment duration within DBT remains a topic of investigation. This retrospective, naturalistic non-randomized study aimed to compare the efficacy of 8 week and 12 week DBT interventions with equivalent content, focusing on the change of BPD-specific symptomatology as the primary outcome and depressive symptoms as the secondary outcome. Overall, 175 patients who participated in DBT and received either 8 week or 12 week intervention were included in the analysis. Routine inpatient treatment was adapted from standard DBT with the modules: skill training, interpersonal skills, dealing with feelings, and mindfulness. Measurements were taken at baseline, mid-point, and endpoint. The borderline symptom list-23 (BSL-23) was used for the assessment of borderline-specific symptoms, while the Beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II) was used for the assessment of depressive symptoms. Statistical analysis was conducted using linear mixed models. Effect sizes were calculated for both measures. The results of the analysis indicated an improvement in both groups over time. Effect sizes were d = 1.29 for BSL-23 and d = 1.79 for BDI-II in the 8 week group, and d = 1.16 for BSL-23 and d = 1.58 for BDI-II in the 12 week group. However, there were no differences in the change of BPD-specific symptoms or the severity of depressive symptoms between the 8 week and 12 week treatment duration groups. Based on these findings, shorter treatment durations, like 8 weeks, could be a viable alternative, offering comparable therapeutic benefits, potential cost reduction, and improved accessibility. However, further research is needed to explore factors influencing treatment outcomes and evaluate the long-term effects of different treatment durations in DBT for BPD.Trial registration: drks.de (DRKS00030939) registered 19/12/2022.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Terapia Conductual Dialéctica , Pacientes Internos , Humanos , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/psicología , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Terapia Conductual Dialéctica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , Depresión/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Conductista/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sexuality and gender minoritised (SGM) adolescents are at increased risk of self-injury and suicide, and experience barriers to accessing mental health support. Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) is an effective treatment for self-injury and emotion dysregulation in adolescent populations, but few studies have published outcomes of DBT for SGM young people. AIMS: This study aimed to investigate treatment outcomes and completion for SGM adolescents and their cisgender and heterosexual peers, in the National & Specialist CAMHS, DBT service (UK). METHOD: Treatment completion, and opting out before and during treatment were examined for sexual and gender identity groups, as well as changes by the end of treatment in emotion dysregulation, self-injury, in-patient bed-days, emergency department attendances, and borderline personality disorder, depression and anxiety symptoms. RESULTS: SGM adolescents were over-represented in this service, even after considering their increased risk for self-injury. No statistically significant differences were found for treatment completion between the sexual orientation and gender identity groups, although there were patterns indicating possible lower treatment uptake and completion that warrant further investigation. Clinical outcomes for treatment-completers showed improvement by the end of DBT for each group, with few exceptions. DISCUSSION: These results are from relatively small subsamples, and it was not possible to separate by sex assigned at birth. Findings should be treated tentatively and as early indications of effect sizes to inform future studies. This study suggests that DBT could be a useful treatment for SGM adolescents in a highly specialist treatment setting.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Conductual Dialéctica , Conducta Autodestructiva , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Humanos , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Minorías Sexuales y de Género/psicología , Conducta Autodestructiva/terapia , Conducta Autodestructiva/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/psicologíaRESUMEN
Understanding and processing life experiences are essential in the treatment of personality disorders to promote personal recovery and psychological wellbeing. In this qualitative case report, drafted in co-creation between the client, clinical psychologist, and art therapist, individual treatment consisted of two psychotherapeutic interventions, "An Empowering Story" and life-story-focused art therapy, in 12 parallel sessions for 24 weeks. Hilda, 68 years of age, had been diagnosed with an unspecified personality disorder and various traits of borderline personality disorder. She experienced emotional exhaustion following long-term mental health problems rooted in a traumatic early childhood. This affected her ability to manage her emotions and social relations, resulting in the sense that her life had no meaning. Hilda was invited to reconstruct her life experiences, divided into the past, turning point, and present/future, in a written and a painted life story. This allowed for the integration of traumatic as well as positive memories, enhanced self-compassion, and meaning making. She developed self-reflection and integration of internal conflicts leading to a better emotional balance and self-understanding. Art therapy emphasizes bottom-up regulatory processes, while narrative psychology supports top-down regulatory processes. The combined approach effectively integrated bottom-up, experiential, sensory experiences with top-down, cognitive emotion-regulation processes. The results suggest that psychotherapeutic interventions involving a multi-pronged, complementary, and thus more holistic approach can support personal recovery in personality disorders.
Asunto(s)
Arteterapia , Humanos , Arteterapia/métodos , Femenino , Anciano , Trastornos de la Personalidad/terapia , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/psicología , Terapia Narrativa/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Yoga can be used as a complementary intervention to conventional treatments, whether pharmacological or non-pharmacological. Sustained practice of yoga can generate a series of benefits for individuals' quality of life and improve their physical fitness. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential effects of yoga as an adjunct intervention in conditions involving impulse control issues, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), borderline personality disorder, bipolar affective disorder, and substance use disorders. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of placebo-controlled, randomized trials of yoga in patients with impulsivity. PubMed, Web of Science, and Science Direct databases were searched for trials published up to January, 2023. Data were extracted from published reports and quality assessment was performed per Cochrane recommendations. RESULTS: Out of 277 database results, 6 RCT were included in this systematic review. To assess the level of attention and impulsiveness, the following scales were analyzed: Barratt Impulsiveness, UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior scale, Conners' Continuous Performance Test IIª and Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Long. CONCLUSIONS: Yoga didn't have a significant improvement in impulsivity when compared to placebo. There are many tools to assess impulsivity, but they mean different concepts and domains consisting in a weakness on comparison of yoga effects. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42023389088.
Asunto(s)
Conducta Impulsiva , Yoga , Yoga/psicología , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/terapia , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/psicología , Trastorno Bipolar/terapia , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the acceptance, feasibility and safety of a short-term group program for adults (18 years and older) and youth (16 to 18 years) with borderline personality disorder (BPD) symptoms. Termed Road Maps, the content and development were informed by common treatment factors identified from evidence-based therapies for BPD. METHOD: Two-hundred and eight people consented to participate in the research trial and completed baseline measures. Intervention participants rated the acceptability and subjective experience of the group. Attrition rates informed feasibility, and serious adverse events were tracked to identify potential harms. RESULTS: Participant post-group ratings of the group's acceptability and subjective experience were above average across both adult and youth populations. Attrition rate after commencement of group was 38% for adults and 27% among youth. The incidence rate of emergency department presentations was reduced by 41% in the 6 months post-group, relative to 6 months pre-group. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides preliminary support for the acceptability and feasibility of a short-term group therapy program for people with a diagnosis of BPD. Road Maps may be a useful intermediate intervention in a broader model of stepped care. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622000849796.aspx, (ACTRN12622000849796).
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Estudios de Factibilidad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Psicoterapia de Grupo , Humanos , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Psicoterapia de Grupo/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicoterapia Breve/métodos , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Although the clinical symptoms of borderline personality disorder (BPD) tend to remit over time, a substantial proportion continues to present "long-lasting symptoms" (LLS). This term refers to individuals who present some degree of clinical improvement, but low mood, feelings of emptiness, and poor psychosocial adjustment typically persist. The aim of this study was to compare the sociodemographic, clinical, and therapeutic variables in individuals with BPD with and without LLS. A total of 620 participants with BPD were included and subdivided into two groups: non-LLS group (n = 549, mean age = 28.02 [6.1] and range, 18-40 years) and LLS group (n = 71, mean age = 44.69 [3.6] and range, 41-56 years). The groups were compared in sociodemographic, clinical, and drug treatment characteristics. We also evaluated the impact of dialectical behavioral therapy-skills training (DBT-ST) on polypharmacy. The prevalence of individuals with long-lasting BPD symptoms increased significantly over a 20-year period (from <1% to 16%). The LLS group was characterized by less clinical severity, higher comorbidity with affective disorders but lower comorbidity with eating disorders, more disability, and more medication taking. Patients with LLS who received DBT-ST experienced a significant decrease in the use of benzodiazepines and the number of medications prescribed compared with those who did not receive DBT-ST. Clinicians should be aware of the specific features of older patients with BPD in order to better identify and address their specific therapeutic needs.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Terapia Conductual Dialéctica , Humanos , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Masculino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Comorbilidad , PolifarmaciaRESUMEN
Trauma-Informed Behavioral Supports (TIBS) is a novel treatment approach targeting aggression against self or against others in individuals who experience borderline personality disorder (BPD). It is based on applied behavior analysis and uses a person-centered and trauma-informed framework. People with BPD hospitalized because of concerning behaviors, [aggression to others, verbal aggression (e.g., defined as aggression in the forms of verbal threats, etc.), physical aggression, and self-injury, etc.] may experience exacerbations of such behavior in the hospital. Individuals diagnosed with BPD were treated with TIBS to diminish the frequency of concerning behaviors in the context of a pilot study. Functioning during a three-month pre-treatment phase was compared with a six-month treatment phase. The TIBS intervention resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful decreases in physical and verbal aggression. The results of this pilot investigation approach suggests that TIBS can promote behavior change in the inpatient setting.
Asunto(s)
Agresión , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Pacientes Internos , Humanos , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Proyectos Piloto , Masculino , Terapia Conductista/métodos , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trauma Psicológico/terapiaRESUMEN
AIMS: This paper aims to describe Roger Mulder's presentation on borderline personality disorder organized by the 23rd World Congress of Psychiatry, supplemented with relevant research results. METHODS: Mulder presents the diagnostic criteria of borderline personality disorder, its comorbidity, therapeutic considerations and the phenomenon of stigmatization related to the disorder. RESULTS: According to Mulder, the diagnostic criteria of borderline personality disorder are vague and it shows a very high comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders. Mulder draws attention to the fact that it was not possible to identify a borderline factor in previous research because the borderline symptoms disappeared during the analysis in a general ("g") personality disorder factor. According to Mulder, there is no specific psychotherapy that is effective only in borderline personality disorder, and the pharmacological treatment has also not proven to be effective in treating the core symptoms of borderline personality disorder. According to Mulder, the stigma associated with the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder hinders the recognition and treatment of other psychiatric or somatic difficulties of patients. CONCLUSION: according to Mulder, based on modern scientific standards, borderline personality disorder has no place in the classification, however, specialists still insist on the diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Humanos , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/diagnóstico , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Trastornos de la Personalidad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Personalidad/epidemiología , Psicoterapia/métodos , Comorbilidad , Escalas de Valoración PsiquiátricaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although clinical guidelines prioritize the treatment of depression and anxiety in young persons, there is accumulating evidence that the presence of symptoms of borderline personality disorder (BPD) is associated with the limited effectiveness of these standard treatments. These findings stress the need for interventions addressing early-stage BPD in young people with presenting symptoms of anxiety and depressive disorders. The aim of this study is to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of an early intervention programme for BPD (MBT-early) compared to first-choice psychological treatment for depression and anxiety according to Dutch treatment guidelines (CBT), in adolescents with either depression, anxiety, or both, in combination with early-stage BPD. METHODS: This study is a multi-centre randomized controlled trial. A total of 132 adolescents, presenting with either depression, anxiety, or both and significant BPD features will be randomized to either MBT-early or CBT. The severity of BPD, symptoms of depression and anxiety, personality, social and academic functioning, and quality of life will be assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and at 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow-up, along with medical costs and costs of productivity losses for cost-effectiveness analyses. DISCUSSION: This study will provide an empirical evaluation of the potential surplus value of early intervention in young people for whom treatment oriented at common mental disorders like anxiety and depression may be insufficient given their underlying personality problems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NL9569. Registered on June 15, 2021.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Adolescente , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/diagnóstico , Trastorno de Personalidad Limítrofe/terapia , Personalidad , Ansiedad , Intervención Educativa Precoz , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoRESUMEN
BPD Compass is a transdiagnostic psychotherapy that includes cognitive, behavioral, and mindfulness skills targeting the personality dimensions of negative affectivity, disinhibition, and antagonism. Given considerable symptom comorbidity and overlap in etiology between borderline personality disorder (BPD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), this study investigated whether BPD Compass holds promise as an integrated approach to simultaneously treating co-occurring BPD features and PTSD symptoms. Participants included 84 trauma-exposed adults who participated in a two-phase clinical trial (Phase 1: randomized controlled trial of BPD Compass vs. waitlist [n = 43]; Phase 2: open trial of BPD Compass [n = 41]). Compared to waitlist, BPD Compass led to medium-to-large-sized, significant improvements in BPD features, ßs = -.57 -.44, and facets of neuroticism, ßs < -.55--.73, as well as small, nonsignificant improvements in self-reported, ß = -.20, and clinician-rated PTSD symptom severity, ß = -.19. During treatment, within-person improvements in PTSD symptoms predicted subsequent improvements in BPD features, ß = .13, but not vice versa, ß = .07. Within-person PTSD symptom reduction also predicted subsequent improvement in all personality dimensions, whereas only within-person improvement in despondence, ß = .12, affective dysregulation, ß = .11, and dissociative tendencies, ß = .12, predicted PTSD symptom reductions. Findings offer preliminary support for the potential of BPD Compass to target BPD features and aspects of neuroticism and agreeableness among trauma-exposed adults. Moreover, PTSD symptom change predicting subsequent improvement in BPD features runs counter to current stage-based treatment models that emphasize BPD feature stabilization before engaging in trauma-focused therapy.