Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 12.332
Filtrar
1.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 52(3): 1-7, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38721949

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Many chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients have highly stressful life events and exhibit psychiatric comorbidities. Emotional stress can cause or exacerbate urticaria symptoms by causing mast cell degranulation via neuromediators. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the frequency of stressful life events and compare psychiatric comorbidities and serum neuromediator levels in patients with CSU who responded to omalizumab with healthy controls. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we included 42 patients with CSU who received at least 6 months of omalizumab treatment and a control group of 42 healthy controls. Stressful life events were evaluated with the Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-42 (DASS-42) was used to evaluate depression, anxiety and stress levels. Serum nerve growth factor (NGF), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P (SP) levels were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. RESULTS: Twenty-six (62%) patients reported at least one stressful life event a median of 3.5 months before the onset of CSU. There were no significant differences in all three variables in the DASS subscales between the patient and control groups. Serum NGF levels were found to be significantly lower in patients with CSU (p <0.001), whereas CGRP levels were found to be significantly higher (p <0.001). There was no significant difference for SP. CONCLUSIONS: The psychological status of patients with CSU who benefited from omalizumab was similar to that of healthy controls. Omalizumab may affect stress-related neuromediator levels.


Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos , Urticaria Crónica , Factor de Crecimiento Nervioso , Omalizumab , Estrés Psicológico , Humanos , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Urticaria Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Urticaria Crónica/sangre , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estrés Psicológico/tratamiento farmacológico , Estrés Psicológico/sangre , Factor de Crecimiento Nervioso/sangre , Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Sustancia P/sangre , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina , Comorbilidad , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/sangre , Depresión/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/sangre , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología
2.
Psychiatr Clin North Am ; 47(2): 367-398, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724126

RESUMEN

Administration of psychedelics for mental health treatment, typically referred to as "psychedelic-assisted therapy," is a broad term with a very heterogeneous implementation. Despite increasing interest in the clinical application of psychedelic compounds for psychiatric disorders, there is no consensus on how to best integrate the psychedelic experience with evidence-based psychotherapeutic treatment. This systematic review provides a timely appraisal of existing approaches to combining psychotherapy with psychedelics and provides clear recommendations to best develop, optimize, and integrate evidence-based psychotherapy with psychedelic administration for straightforward scientific inference and maximal therapeutic benefit.


Asunto(s)
Alucinógenos , Trastornos Mentales , Psicoterapia , Humanos , Alucinógenos/uso terapéutico , Psicoterapia/métodos , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia
3.
Comput Biol Med ; 175: 108536, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701592

RESUMEN

In response to the shortcomings in data quality and coverage for neurological and psychiatric disorders (NPDs) in existing comprehensive databases, this paper introduces the DTNPD database, specifically designed for NPDs. DTNPD contains detailed information on 30 NPDs types, 1847 drugs, 514 drug targets, 64 drug combinations, and 61 potential target combinations, forming a network with 2389 drug-target associations. The database is user-friendly, offering open access and downloadable data, which is crucial for network pharmacology studies. The key strength of DTNPD lies in its robust networks of drug and target combinations, as well as drug-target networks, facilitating research and development in the field of NPDs. The development of the DTNPD database marks a significant milestone in understanding and treating NPDs. For accessing the DTNPD database, the primary URL is http://dtnpd.cnsdrug.com, complemented by a mirror site available at http://dtnpd.lyhbio.com.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/metabolismo , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/tratamiento farmacológico , Bases de Datos Farmacéuticas , Bases de Datos Factuales
4.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e078431, 2024 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724060

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the time course of medication adherence and some of the factors involved in this process in undocumented migrants with chronic diseases. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A big non-governmental organisation in Milano, Italy, giving medical assistance to undocumented migrants. PARTICIPANTS: 1918 patients, 998 females and 920 males, with at least one chronic condition (diabetes, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), mental health disorders) seen over a period of 10 years (2011-2020). Their mean age was 49.2±13 years. RESULTS: Adherence to medications decreased over 1 year in all patients. This was more evident during the first 2 months of treatment. Patients on only one medication were less adherent than those on more than one medication; at 6 months the percentage of patients with high adherence was 33% vs 57% (p<0.0001) for diabetes, 15% vs 46% (p<0.0001) for mental disorders and 35% vs 59% (p<0.0001) for CVDs. Patients with mental disorders had the lowest adherence: 25% at 6 months and 3% at 1 year. Mental disorders, when present as comorbidities, greatly reduced the probability of being highly adherent: risk ratio (RR) 0.72 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.91; p=0.006) at 3 months, RR 0.77, (95% CI 0.59 to 1.01; p=0.06) at 6 months, RR 0.35 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.94; p=0.04) at 1 year. This was especially evident for patients with CVDs, whose percentage of high adherents decreased to 30% (p=0.0008) at 6 months and to 3% (p=0.01) at 1 year. We also noted that highly adherent patients usually were those most frequently seen by a doctor. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to increase medication adherence of undocumented migrants with chronic diseases are necessary, particularly in the first 2 months after beginning treatment. These should be aimed at people-centred care and include more outpatient consultations. Educational interventions should especially be taken into consideration for patients on monotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Trastornos Mentales , Migrantes , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Italia , Adulto , Migrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Migrantes/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico
5.
BMC Neurol ; 24(1): 166, 2024 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773441

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is a prevalent neurological disorder that affects a significant number of individuals globally. This condition is associated with a high occurrence of psychiatric comorbidities, which can significantly affect the quality of life of individuals affected. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between antiseizure therapies and the likelihood of psychiatric comorbidities in individuals with epilepsy. METHODOLOGY: Data for this study was gathered from the Neurology referral center in Islamabad, Pakistan. A standardized questionnaire was utilized to gather data from 120 individuals diagnosed with epilepsy. The survey consisted of inquiries regarding the management of seizures, the utilization of anti-seizure medications, and the presence of psychiatric comorbidities. The data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). RESULTS: The findings indicated that individuals who were using multiple antiseizure medications had a notably higher likelihood of having psychiatric comorbidities in comparison to those who were on mono therapy (p = 0.010). suggests that patients with unsuccessful seizure control are more probable to have psychiatric comorbidities as compared to those with good seizure control (p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: To conclude poor seizure control and poly therapy are associated with increased risk of psychiatric comorbidities.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes , Epilepsia , Trastornos Mentales , Humanos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Epilepsia/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Comorbilidad , Adolescente , Pakistán/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
Indian J Med Ethics ; IX(2): 89-93, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755760

RESUMEN

The relationship between the pharmaceutical companies and the healthcare profession, especially doctors, has always been fraught with conflicts of interest (COI). The publication of the influential The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), by the American Psychiatric Society (APA) raised concerns that the financial relationships between pharma and members responsible for DSM could result in bias. This resulted in calls for stricter enforcement of controls on financial conflict of interest (FCOI) [1, 2], which could influence the formulation of diagnostic criteria (resulting in more people being "diagnosable as mentally ill"), creating a larger pool of "patients" who "need" pharmaceutical drugs. Knowingly or unknowingly, they would end up serving the pharmaceutical companies' agenda to sell more drugs and drive up profits [2] .


Asunto(s)
Conflicto de Intereses , Industria Farmacéutica , Humanos , Industria Farmacéutica/ética , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , India , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos
7.
Nutrients ; 16(9)2024 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38732599

RESUMEN

In this study, a systematic review of randomized clinical trials conducted from January 2000 to December 2023 was performed to examine the efficacy of psychobiotics-probiotics beneficial to mental health via the gut-brain axis-in adults with psychiatric and cognitive disorders. Out of the 51 studies involving 3353 patients where half received psychobiotics, there was a notably high measurement of effectiveness specifically in the treatment of depression symptoms. Most participants were older and female, with treatments commonly utilizing strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria over periods ranging from 4 to 24 weeks. Although there was a general agreement on the effectiveness of psychobiotics, the variability in treatment approaches and clinical presentations limits the comparability and generalization of the findings. This underscores the need for more personalized treatment optimization and a deeper investigation into the mechanisms through which psychobiotics act. The research corroborates the therapeutic potential of psychobiotics and represents progress in the management of psychiatric and cognitive disorders.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Probióticos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Trastornos del Conocimiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Eje Cerebro-Intestino/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Lactobacillus , Anciano , Bifidobacterium
9.
Addict Sci Clin Pract ; 19(1): 37, 2024 May 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741162

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of co-occurring mental disorders (termed 'dual diagnosis') among patients receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is scarce. This study aimed (1) to estimate the prevalence and structure of dual diagnoses in two national cohorts of OAT patients and (2) to compare mental disorders between OAT patients and the general populations stratified on sex and standardized by age. METHODS: A registry-linkage study of OAT patients from Czechia (N = 4,280) and Norway (N = 11,389) during 2010-2019 was conducted. Data on mental disorders (F00-F99; ICD-10) recorded in nationwide health registers were linked to the individuals registered in OAT. Dual diagnoses were defined as any mental disorder excluding substance use disorders (SUDs, F10-F19; ICD-10). Sex-specific age-standardized morbidity ratios (SMR) were calculated for 2019 to compare OAT patients and the general populations. RESULTS: The prevalence of dual diagnosis was 57.3% for Czechia and 78.3% for Norway. In Czechia, anxiety (31.1%) and personality disorders (25.7%) were the most prevalent, whereas anxiety (33.8%) and depression (20.8%) were the most prevalent in Norway. Large country-specific variations were observed, e.g., in ADHD (0.5% in Czechia, 15.8% in Norway), implying differences in screening and diagnostic practices. The SMR estimates for any mental disorders were 3.1 (females) and 5.1 (males) in Czechia and 5.6 (females) and 8.2 (males) in Norway. OAT females had a significantly higher prevalence of co-occurring mental disorders, whereas SMRs were higher in OAT males. In addition to opioid use disorder (OUD), other substance use disorders (SUDs) were frequently recorded in both countries. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate an excess of mental health problems in OAT patients compared to the general population of the same sex and age in both countries, requiring appropriate clinical attention. Country-specific differences may stem from variations in diagnostics and care, reporting to registers, OAT provision, or substance use patterns.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Noruega/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Prevalencia , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/estadística & datos numéricos , República Checa/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Trastornos de la Personalidad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Factores Sexuales
11.
Psychiatry Res ; 335: 115886, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574699

RESUMEN

We aim to systematically review and meta-analyze the effectiveness and safety of psychedelics [psilocybin, ayahuasca (active component DMT), LSD and MDMA] in treating symptoms of various mental disorders. Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and PubMed were searched up to February 2024 and 126 articles were finally included. Results showed that psilocybin has the largest number of articles on treating mood disorders (N = 28), followed by ayahuasca (N = 7) and LSD (N = 6). Overall, psychedelics have therapeutic effects on mental disorders such as depression and anxiety. Specifically, psilocybin (Hedges' g = -1.49, 95% CI [-1.67, -1.30]) showed the strongest therapeutic effect among four psychedelics, followed by ayahuasca (Hedges' g = -1.34, 95% CI [-1.86, -0.82]), MDMA (Hedges' g = -0.83, 95% CI [-1.33, -0.32]), and LSD (Hedges' g = -0.65, 95% CI [-1.03, -0.27]). A small amount of evidence also supports psychedelics improving tobacco addiction, eating disorders, sleep disorders, borderline personality disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and body dysmorphic disorder. The most common adverse event with psychedelics was headache. Nearly a third of the articles reported that no participants reported lasting adverse effects. Our analyses suggest that psychedelics reduce negative mood, and have potential efficacy in other mental disorders, such as substance-use disorders and PTSD.


Asunto(s)
Alucinógenos , Trastornos Mentales , N-Metil-3,4-metilenodioxianfetamina , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo , Humanos , Alucinógenos/efectos adversos , Psilocibina/efectos adversos , N-Metil-3,4-metilenodioxianfetamina/uso terapéutico , Dietilamida del Ácido Lisérgico/efectos adversos , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/inducido químicamente , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/tratamiento farmacológico
12.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 241(6): 1101-1110, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38683460

RESUMEN

Recent years have seen a resurgence in randomized, placebo controlled trials (RCTs) utilizing non-classical psychedelics (e.g. 3,4-methyl enedioxy methamphetamine [MDMA]), and classical psychedelics (e.g. psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide [LSD], and N,N-dimethyltryptamine [DMT/ayahuasca]) in conjunction with assisted therapy (AT) for psychiatric disorders. A notable methodological challenge in psychedelic AT, however, is the complexity of blinding procedures. The lack of efficacious blinding can introduce considerable response bias, reduce internal validity, and compromise participant retention. This systematic review examines design and blinding techniques in RCTs utilizing psychedelics and placebo for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. The aim of this work is to identify factors that may inform future RTC design for conducting psychedelics research. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Psycinfo, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection to examine: (1) placebo selection, (2) study design, and (3) integrity of blinding measures. Sixteen publications were identified as meeting the criteria for a systematic review. Our findings suggest that traditional placebo administration is insufficient to control for expectancy confounds. Consequently, experimental methodology that limits personnel unblinding and the use of an active placebo are important considerations when designing prospective clinical studies involving psychedelics.


Asunto(s)
Alucinógenos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Alucinógenos/administración & dosificación , Alucinógenos/farmacología , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Proyectos de Investigación , Método Doble Ciego
13.
Tijdschr Psychiatr ; 66(3): 125-129, 2024.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650508

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is an evidence-based model that involves the collaborative development of a treatment plan. SDM in adolescents with mental health problems is complex. Most mental health problems arise in adolescence and psychotropic drugs are an important part of treatment. Previous research focuses primarily on caregivers’ experience with SDM. AIM: This research has the main objective to gain insight into the adolescents’ experience with shared decision making related to psychotropic drugs. METHODS: Qualitative research through semi-structured interviews with 12 adolescents (12-18 years old) between June and October 2021, followed by thematic analysis of the data using the systematic text condensation (Malterud). RESULTS: Four themes were identified in the analysis: 1) the adolescent wants to feel heard, 2) the adolescent needs support in forming and expressing his/her opinion, 3) SDM in adolescents is a complex trialogue, and 4) the decision-making process affects treatment and adherence. CONCLUSION: When we ask adolescents about their experience with SDM, we can learn the following:- Involve parents, but always tailor this to the individual adolescent and his context. – Put the adolescent at the center. – Dwell on the adolescent’s view on psychotropic drugs.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Psicotrópicos , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Adolescente , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Toma de Decisiones , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico
14.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e247965, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652474

RESUMEN

Importance: Numerous studies have provided evidence for the negative associations of the COVID-19 pandemic with mental health, but data on the use of psychotropic medication in children and adolescents after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic are lacking. Objective: To assess the rates and trends of psychotropic medication prescribing before and over the 2 years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in children and adolescents in France. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used nationwide interrupted time-series analysis of outpatient drug dispensing data from the IQVIA X-ponent database. All 8 839 143 psychotropic medication prescriptions dispensed to children (6 to 11 years of age) and adolescents (12 to 17 years of age) between January 2016 and May 2022 in France were retrieved and analyzed. Exposure: Onset of COVID-19 pandemic. Main outcomes and Measures: Monthly rates of psychotropic medication prescriptions per 1000 children and adolescents were analyzed using a quasi-Poisson regression before and after the pandemic onset (March 2020), and percentage changes in rates and trends were assessed. After the pandemic onset, rate ratios (RRs) were calculated between estimated and expected monthly prescription rates. Analyses were stratified by psychotropic medication class (antipsychotic, anxiolytic, hypnotic and sedative, antidepressant, and psychostimulant) and age group (children, adolescents). Results: In total, 8 839 143 psychotropic medication prescriptions were analyzed, 5 884 819 [66.6%] for adolescents and 2 954 324 [33.4%] for children. In January 2016, the estimated rate of monthly psychotropic medication prescriptions was 9.9 per 1000 children and adolescents, with the prepandemic rate increasing by 0.4% per month (95% CI, 0.3%-0.4%). In March 2020, the monthly prescription rate dropped by 11.5% (95% CI, -17.7% to -4.9%). During the 2 years following the pandemic onset, the trend changed significantly, and the prescription rate increased by 1.3% per month (95% CI, 1.2%-1.5%), reaching 16.1 per 1000 children and adolescents in May 2022. Monthly rates of psychotropic medication prescriptions exceeded the expected rates by 11% (RR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.08-1.14]). Increases in prescribing trends were observed for all psychotropic medication classes after the pandemic onset but were substantial for anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives, and antidepressants. Prescription rates rose above those expected for all psychotropic medication classes except psychostimulants (RR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.09-1.15] in adolescents and 1.06 [95% CI, 1.05-1.07] in children for antipsychotics; RR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.25-1.35] in adolescents and 1.11 [95% CI, 1.09-1.12] in children for anxiolytics; RR, 2.50 [95% CI, 2.23-2.77] in adolescents and 1.40 [95% CI, 1.30-1.50] in children for hypnotics and sedatives; RR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.29-1.47] in adolescents and 1.23 [95% CI, 1.20-1.25] in children for antidepressants; and RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95-0.98] in adolescents and 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00-1.04] in children for psychostimulants). Changes were more pronounced among adolescents than children. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that prescribing of psychotropic medications for children and adolescents in France significantly and persistently increased after the COVID-19 pandemic onset. Future research should identify underlying determinants to improve psychological trajectories in young people.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Psicotrópicos , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiología , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Francia/epidemiología , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Betacoronavirus , Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología
16.
Psychiatry Res ; 336: 115917, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663222

RESUMEN

The relationship between the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and suicide risk in patients with mental disorders remains controversial. We conducted a network meta-analysis to examine the effects of SSRIs on suicide risk in patients with mental disorders. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, Wanfang Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for articles published until December 19, 2023. The main outcomes were suicidal ideation and instances of suicidal behavior. We included 29 double-blind randomized trials in our analysis. The findings suggest that SSRIs primarily offer short-term protection against suicidal ideation. By week 2, paroxetine, fluoxetine, escitalopram, and non-SSRI treatments were linked to a decreased suicide risk compared with a placebo, with the exception of sertraline. This protective effect was diminished by week 8. In contrast, studies on instances of suicidal behavior from weeks 1 to 10 found no significant difference in efficacy between SSRIs, non-SSRIs, and placebo. These results indicate that SSRIs may offer short-term protection against suicidal ideation. However, their long-term effectiveness in mitigating suicidal ideation and preventing suicidal behaviors is limited.


Asunto(s)
Metaanálisis en Red , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina , Ideación Suicida , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/farmacología , Humanos , Método Doble Ciego , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico
17.
Tijdschr Psychiatr ; 66(4): 202-208, 2024.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38650529

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Given the growing focus on deprescribing, it is crucial to thoroughly evaluate our benzodiazepine prescribing practices considering the potential risks. AIM: To investigate the prevalence and predictors of benzodiazepine prescriptions during psychiatric hospitalization and as discharge medication. METHOD: This retrospective electronic patient file study included psychiatric admissions at the UMC Utrecht between 12/01/01 and 21/04/01. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate prevalence of benzodiazepine prescriptions in youth and adults. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to predict factors associated with benzodiazepine prescriptions and dosage. RESULTS: In total, we analyzed data from 856 admissions of youth and 4002 admissions of adults. 36.0% of the youth were prescribed benzodiazepines during admission and 14.8% at discharge. Associated factors were age (OR: 1.38) and bipolar disorder (OR: 3.98). In adults, 69.7% were prescribed benzodiazepines during admission and 37.6% at discharge. Associated factors were length of hospital stay (OR: 1.01) and anxiety disorders (OR: 2.53). Male sex, age (resp. higher and lower), and a longer length of stay predicted benzodiazepine dosages for both youth (B = 3.48; 95% CI: 0.83-0.07) and adults (B = 2.17; 95% CI: -0.04-0.05). CONCLUSION: Benzodiazepines are frequently prescribed during inpatient stays and at discharge in youth and adults, offering opportunities for deprescribing.


Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas , Humanos , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Adulto , Prevalencia , Niño , Adulto Joven , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad
18.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38676687

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the possibilities of therapy with minimal effective doses (MED) of psychotropic drugs for mental disorders (MD) that manifest during the treatment of hematological malignancies (HM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study was conducted at the National Medical Research Center for Hematology of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow), which included 204 (39.4%) men and 314 (60.6%) women (518 patients in total), aged 17 to 83 years (median 45 years), with various HM, in which the manifestation of MD occurred during the treatment of the underlying disease. To minimize the side-effects of psychotropic drugs and given the relatively mild level of MD, psychopharmacotherapy of patients was carried out mainly at MED. The severity of MD, manifested in patients, was assessed by the illness severity scale of the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, and the effectiveness of the treatment was assessed by the improvement scale (CGI-I). RESULTS: Mainly mild (188, 36%) and moderately pronounced (270, 52%) MD were noted in patients with HM during the treatment of the underlying disease. Severe psychopathological disorders (60, 12%) were observed much less often. Because of psychopharmacotherapy with MED, patients experienced a very significant (97, 19%) and significant improvement (354, 68%) of their mental state, less often the improvement was regarded as minimal (67, 13%). Therefore, almost all patients showed a stable relief of MD; in 87% (95% CI 84-90) of patients, this improvement was significant. CONCLUSION: The tactics of treatment MD that manifest in patients with HM with MED of psychotropic drugs turned out to be therapeutically effective according to the results of the assessment on CGI scales.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Trastornos Mentales , Psicotrópicos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/etiología , Anciano , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adolescente , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Psychogeriatrics ; 24(3): 665-674, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561326

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of opioid medicines is common in developed countries, particularly among older adults and those with mental health disorders. It is unclear if the association between mental disorders and opioid medicines is causal, or is due to reverse causality or confounding. METHODS: We used a 10% random sample of the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (years 2012-2022) to examine the cross-sectional, case-control and longitudinal association between the dispensing of antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics, antipsychotics and lithium, and opioid medicines. We used logistic regression, structural equation models (SEM), and Cox regression to analyze the data. Analyses were adjusted for age (years), sex, and number of non-psychotropic medicines dispensed during the year. RESULTS: The 2022 file contained 804 334 individuals aged 50 years or over (53.1% women), of whom 181 690 (22.6%) received an opioid medicine. The adjusted odds ratio of being dispensed opioid medicines was 1.44 (99% CI = 1.42-1.46) for antidepressants, 1.97 (99% CI = 1.92-2.03) for anxiolytics, 1.55 (99% CI = 1.51-1.60) for hypnotics, 1.32 (99% CI = 1.27-1.38) for antipsychotics, and 0.60 (99% CI = 0.53-0.69) for lithium. Similar associations were noticed when we compared participants who were or not dispensed opioid medicines in 2022 for exposure to psychotropic agents between 2012 and 2021. SEM confirmed that this association was not due to reverse causality. The dispensing of antidepressants was associated with increased adjusted hazard (HR) of subsequent dispensing of opioid medicines (HR = 1.29, 99% CI = 1.27-1.30). Similar associations were observed for anxiolytics, hypnotics and antipsychotics, but not lithium. CONCLUSIONS: The dispensing of opioid medicines is higher among older individuals exposed to antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics and antipsychotics than those who are not. These associations are not due to reverse causality or study design. Preventive strategies seeking to minimise the risk of inappropriate use of opioid medicines in later life should consider targeting this high-risk population.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Psicotrópicos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Australia/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico
20.
Toxins (Basel) ; 16(4)2024 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38668616

RESUMEN

Botulinum toxin type A (BONT-A) has shown promise in improving the mood-related symptoms of psychiatric disorders by targeting muscles linked to the expression of negative emotions. We conducted a systematic review of past and ongoing efficacy trials of BONT-A therapy for psychiatric disorders to identify relevant trends in the field and discuss the refinement of therapeutic techniques. A comprehensive search for published clinical trials using BONT-A injections for psychiatric disorders was performed on 4 May 2023 through OVID databases (MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO). Unpublished clinical trials were searched through the ClinicalTrials.gov and International Clinical Trial Registry Platform public registries. The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal tools for use in systematic reviews. We identified 21 studies (17 published, 4 unpublished clinical trials) involving 471 patients. The studies focused on evaluating the efficacy of BONT-A for major depressive, borderline personality, social anxiety, and bipolar disorders. BONT-A was most commonly injected into the glabellar area, with an average dose ranging between 37.75 U and 44.5 U in published studies and between 32.7 U and 41.3 U in unpublished trials. The results indicated significant symptom reductions across all the studied psychiatric conditions, with mild adverse effects. Thus, BONT-A appears to be safe and well-tolerated for psychiatric disorders of negative affectivity. However, despite the clinical focus, there was a noted shortage of biomarker-related assessments. Future studies should focus on pursuing mechanistic explorations of BONT-A effects at the neurobiological level.


Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Trastornos Mentales , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA