Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros












Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 37(8): 1-3, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39037104

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Isotretinoin is an oral retinoic drug for severe resistant acne cases that has controversially been associated with multiple psychiatric adverse effects. Research has primarily focused on depression and suicidality; however, a few case studies reported hypersomnia and sleep changes after isotretinoin initiation. OBJECTIVE: To assess sleep quality and measure rates of hypersomnia, depression, and anxiety in patients undergoing isotretinoin therapy. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at outpatient clinics of the university hospital. The rate of self-reported oversleeping was measured. In addition, researchers used the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index to assess sleep quality and conducted semistructured clinical interviews to detect depression and anxiety. RESULTS: Of 123 patients with acne on isotretinoin, 77 (62.6%) reported oversleeping. Nearly half (60 patients, 48.8%) were categorized as poor sleepers according to the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The interviews revealed anxiety and depression percentages among 9.8% and 4.9% of participants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hypersomnia was noticeably high in this study sample; thus, it may cautiously suggest a possible link between isotretinoin and hypersomnia. However, more research is needed to investigate this potential relationship.


Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva , Isotretinoína , Humanos , Isotretinoína/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/inducido químicamente , Adulto Joven , Adolescente
2.
Lancet Oncol ; 25(2): 246-254, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38224701

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Olanzapine is an effective antiemetic agent but it results in substantial daytime somnolence when administered at the standard dose. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of low-dose versus standard-dose olanzapine after highly emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with solid tumours. METHODS: This was a single-centre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial done in a tertiary care referral centre in India (Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai). Patients aged 13-75 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, who were receiving doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide or high-dose cisplatin for a solid tumour were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), with block randomisation (block sizes of 2 or 4) and stratified by sex, age (≥55 or <55 years), and chemotherapy regimen, to receive low-dose (2·5 mg) oral olanzapine or standard-dose (10·0 mg) oral olanzapine daily for 4 days, in combination with a triple antiemetic regimen. Study staff were masked to treatment allocation but patients were aware of their group assignment. The primary endpoint was complete control, defined as no emetic episodes, no rescue medications, and no or mild nausea in the overall phase (0-120 hours), assessed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population (ie, all eligible patients who received protocol-specified treatment, excluding those who had eligibility violations and who withdrew consent after randomisation). Daytime somnolence was the safety endpoint of interest. Non-inferiority was shown if the upper limit of the one-sided 95% CI for the difference in the complete control proportions between the treatment groups excluded the non-inferiority margin of 10%. This study is registered with the Clinical Trial Registry India, CTRI/2021/01/030233, is closed to accrual, and this is the final data analysis. RESULTS: Between Feb 9, 2021, and May 30, 2023, 356 patients were pre-screened for eligibility, of whom 275 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (134 to the 2·5 mg olanzapine group and 141 to the 10·0 mg olanzapine group). 267 patients (132 in the 2·5 mg group and 135 in the 10·0 mg group) were included in the mITT population, of whom 252 (94%) were female, 15 (6%) were male, and 242 (91%) had breast cancer. 59 (45%) of 132 patients in the 2·5 mg olanzapine group had complete control in the overall phase versus 59 (44%) of 135 in the 10·0 mg olanzapine group (difference -1·0% [one-sided 95% CI -100·0 to 9·0]; p=0·87). In the overall phase, there were significantly fewer patients in the 2·5 mg olanzapine group than in the 10·0 mg olanzapine group with daytime somnolence of any grade (86 [65%] of 132 vs 121 [90%] of 135; p<0·0001) and of severe grade on day 1 (six]5%] vs 54 [40%]; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that olanzapine 2·5 mg is non-inferior to 10·0 mg in antiemetic efficacy and results in reduced occurrence of daytime somnolence among patients receiving highly emetic chemotherapy and should be considered as a new standard of care. FUNDING: Progressive Ladies Welfare Association.


Asunto(s)
Antieméticos , Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias de la Mama , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Antieméticos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/inducido químicamente , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Náusea/prevención & control , Olanzapina/efectos adversos , Vómitos/inducido químicamente , Vómitos/prevención & control , Vómitos/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Rev. bras. anestesiol ; 69(2): 137-143, Mar.-Apr. 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1003403

RESUMEN

Abstract Background and objectives: Gabapentin is an antiepileptic drug. Widely used for the management of neuropathic pain. Although it is known to be well tolerated, somnolence and dizziness are the most frequent adverse effects. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of melatonin on daytime sleepiness side effect of gabapentin, sleep quality and pain intensity of patients with neuropathic pain. Methods: Patients suffering from "neuropathic pain" and planed to receive gabapentin therapy were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 received melatonin 3 mg and gabapentin 900 mg orally, group 2 received matching placebo capsule and gabapentin 900 mg. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale, the Pittsburgh sleep quality index for assessment of sleep quality and Verbal Rating Scale were completed at the 0th, 10th and 30th days of treatment. Additive analgesic drug requirements were recorded. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled to the study; age, gender, ratio of additive analgesic consumption, baseline Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Pittsburg Sleep Quality index and Verbal Rating Scale scores were similar between the groups. Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores, Pittsburgh sleep quality index scores and Verbal Rating Scale scores in Group 1 were significantly lower than group 2 at the 10th day of treatment (p = 0.002, p = 0.003, p = 0.002 respectively). At the 30th day of treatment, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores and Verbal Rating Scale scores were significantly lower in Group 1 (p = 0.002, p = 0.008 respectively). However, Pittsburgh sleep quality index scores did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.0566). Conclusions: Melatonin supplementation rapidly and significantly improved daytime sleepiness side-effect of gabapentin, however sleep quality of the patients with neuropathic pain was similar between groups.


Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: Gabapentina é um agente antiepiléptico, amplamente utilizado para o tratamento da dor neuropática. Embora conhecida por ser bem-tolerada, sonolência e tontura são os seus efeitos adversos mais frequentes. Neste estudo, nosso objetivo foi avaliar o efeito da melatonina sobre o efeito colateral de sonolência diurna da gabapentina, a qualidade do sono e a intensidade da dor em pacientes com dor neuropática. Métodos: Os pacientes que sofriam de "dor neuropática" e com prescrição para receber terapia com gabapentina foram divididos aleatoriamente em dois grupos. O Grupo 1 recebeu 3 mg de melatonina e 900 mg de gabapentina por via oral, o Grupo 2 recebeu uma cápsula de placebo correspondente e 900 mg de gabapentina. A escala de sonolência de Epworth (ESS), o índice de qualidade do sono de Pittsburgh para avaliação da qualidade do sono (PSQI) e a escala de avaliação verbal (VRS) foram aplicados nos dias 0, 10 e 30 de tratamento. A necessidade de medicamentos analgésicos adicionais foi registrada. Resultados: Oitenta pacientes foram incluídos no estudo; idade, sexo, quantidade de analgésico adicional consumida e os escores basais de ESS, PSQI e VRS foram semelhantes entre os grupos. Os escores ESS, PSQI e VRS do Grupo 1 foram significativamente menores que os do Grupo 2 no décimo dia de tratamento (p = 0,002, p = 0,003, p = 0,002, respectivamente). No trigésimo dia de tratamento, os escores ESS e VRS foram significativamente menores no Grupo 1 (p = 0,002, p = 0,008, respectivamente). No entanto, os escores PSQI não diferiram significativamente entre os grupos (p = 0,0566). Conclusões: A suplementação de melatonina melhorou de forma rápida e significativa o efeito colateral de sonolência diurna da gabapentina, mas a qualidade do sono dos pacientes com dor neuropática foi semelhante entre os grupos.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Gabapentina/administración & dosificación , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/prevención & control , Melatonina/administración & dosificación , Neuralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Sueño/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Tiempo , Método Doble Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento , Gabapentina/efectos adversos , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/inducido químicamente , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
Arq. bras. endocrinol. metab ; 49(4): 510-515, ago. 2005. tab
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS | ID: lil-414768

RESUMEN

O teste da clonidina é amplamente usado para avaliar a secreção do hormônio do crescimento. Os efeitos colaterais são sonolência (35 por cento) e hipotensão arterial (HA) (5 por cento). Nossos objetivos foram avaliar a tolerância ao teste quanto à queda da pressão arterial (PA), grau de sedação e eficácia da expansão volêmica para controle da HA. A PA foi medida nos tempos basal, 60 e 120 min. A sedação foi baseada na escala Ramsay. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos: o Grupo 1 (n= 80) recebeu expansão volêmica apenas com HA grave (queda da PA média [PAM] > 20 por cento da PAM inicial) e/ou hipotensão postural; o Grupo 2 (n=100) recebeu expansão volêmica desde o início do teste. Nos dois grupos, a PAM caiu significativamente e 75 por cento apresentaram sonolência aos 60 min. Não houve correlação da queda da PAM com grau de sedação e dose administrada. O Grupo 1 apresentou mais hipotensão (59 por cento x 28 por cento) e maior queda da PAM aos 60 min. Apenas um paciente apresentou broncoespasmo. Concluímos que o efeito hipotensor da clonidina diminui com expansão volêmica desde o início no teste. Este teste deve ser sempre feito com acompanhamento médico especializado para observação estrita da PA e intervenção precoce, se necessária.


Asunto(s)
Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/efectos adversos , Clonidina/efectos adversos , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/inducido químicamente , Hormona del Crecimiento , Hipotensión/inducido químicamente , Volumen Plasmático/efectos de los fármacos , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos , Clonidina , Hormona del Crecimiento/efectos de los fármacos , Hipotensión/prevención & control , Pruebas de Función Hipofisaria/efectos adversos , Pruebas de Función Hipofisaria/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Solución Salina Hipertónica/uso terapéutico , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...