Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.523
Filtrar
1.
J Orthop Trauma ; 38(7): 351-357, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38837911

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of nonoperative and operative treatment of adolescents with comminuted "Z-type" midshaft clavicle fractures. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Eight tertiary care pediatric centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients aged 10-18 years who were treated either operatively or nonoperatively for a diaphyseal clavicle fracture between 2013 and 2017 were screened/enrolled at the time of injury. The current subcohort analysis was derived from a larger adolescent clavicle study population of 907 patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND COMPARISONS: Complications and validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROs):(ASES, QuickDASH, Marx Shoulder Activity Score, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and patient satisfaction score) were compared between operative and nonoperative cohorts. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients (69 male [85.2%], 12 female; average age 15 years [11.1-18.7]; 78 with sports participation [96.2%]) were followed through bony healing and return to sports, while 59 patients (73%) completed 2-year follow-up with PROs, 26 of whom were treated nonoperatively and 33 treated operatively. All demographic and fracture characteristics were similar (P > 0.05) between the 2-year follow-up cohorts except for fracture shortening, which was greater in the operative cohort (23 vs. 29 mm, P = 0.01). After controlling for this potential confounder through both regression and propensity matched subgroup analysis, nonoperative versus operative cohorts showed no difference in rates of nonunion (0%), delayed union (0% vs. 2.3%, P = 1.0), symptomatic malunion (2.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.4), refracture (2.7% vs. 2.2%, P = 1.0), unexpected subsequent surgery (5.4% vs. 11.4%, P = 0.45), or clinically significant complications (5.4% vs. 16%, P = 0.17). There were no differences in any PROs between cohorts, both before and after controlling for the difference in fracture shortening (all P-values >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective comparison of complications and 2-year PROs in adolescents with comminuted Z-type clavicle fractures, nonoperative and operative treatment yielded similar outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Clavícula , Fracturas Conminutas , Humanos , Clavícula/lesiones , Clavícula/cirugía , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Fracturas Conminutas/cirugía , Niño , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Curación de Fractura , Estudios de Cohortes , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2415102, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842810

RESUMEN

Importance: Moyamoya disease (MMD) is a rare chronic cerebrovascular disease, and the outcomes of bypass management in adult patients remain controversial. Objective: To categorize adult MMD based on asymptomatic, ischemic, and hemorrhagic onset and compare the outcomes (death, hemorrhagic stroke [HS], and ischemic stroke [IS]) of bypass surgery (direct or indirect) with those of conservative management. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, nationwide, population-based longitudinal cohort study used Korean National Health Insurance Research data to identify adults (aged ≥15 years) with MMD who were diagnosed between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2020, and followed up until December 31, 2021 (median follow-up, 5.74 [IQR, 2.95-9.42] years). A total of 19 700 participants (3194 with hemorrhagic, 517 with ischemic, and 15 989 with asymptomatic MMD) were included. Data were analyzed from January 2 to April 1, 2023. Exposures: Bypass surgery and conservative management. Main Outcomes and Measures: Death constituted the primary outcome; secondary outcomes consisted of HS or IS. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were applied. The propensity score-matching and stratified analyses were performed to control covariate effects. Results: A total of 19 700 patients (mean [SD] age, 45.43 [14.98] years; 12 766 [64.8%] female) were included. Compared with conservative management, bypass was associated with a reduced risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.50 [95% CI, 0.41-0.61]; P < .001) and HS (AHR, 0.36 [0.30-0.40]; P < .001) in hemorrhagic MMD; reduced risk of IS (AHR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.37-0.81]; P = .002) in ischemic MMD; and reduced risk of death (AHR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.66-0.84]; P < .001) in asymptomatic MMD. However, bypass was associated with an increased risk of HS (AHR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.56-2.00]; P < .001) in asymptomatic MMD. Both direct and indirect bypass demonstrated similar effects in hemorrhagic and asymptomatic MMD, except only direct bypass was associated with a reduced risk of IS (AHR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.33- 0.83]; P = .01) in ischemic MMD. After stratification, bypass was associated with a reduced risk of death in patients younger than 55 years with ischemic (AHR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.13- 0.88]; P = .03) and asymptomatic (AHR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.60-0.79]; P < .001) MMD, but an increased risk of HS in patients 55 years or older with ischemic MMD (AHR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.1-4.16]; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study of bypass outcomes for patients with MMD emphasize the importance of tailoring management strategies in adult patients based on onset types.


Asunto(s)
Revascularización Cerebral , Enfermedad de Moyamoya , Humanos , Enfermedad de Moyamoya/cirugía , Enfermedad de Moyamoya/mortalidad , Enfermedad de Moyamoya/complicaciones , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , República de Corea/epidemiología , Revascularización Cerebral/métodos , Estudios Longitudinales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/cirugía , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Tratamiento Conservador/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Adulto Joven
3.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 27(1): 85-88, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722131

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Tracheal rupture is a very rare but life-threatening complication of endotracheal intubation. It is more common in women and patients older than 50 years old. Overinflation of endotracheal tube cuff and tracheal wall weakening are the most important pathogenetic mechanisms. Laceration sites are located in the posterior membranous wall in most cases. Subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema and respiratory distress are the most common manifestations. A 55-year-old female presented with postoperative subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema without dyspnea because of a tear in the posterior tracheal wall. The diagnosis was based on clinical manifestation, chest computer tomography scans (CT), and endoscopic findings. A conservative approach by broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy was decided because of patients' vital signs stability and the absence of esophageal injury. The follow-up showed that there was no lesion in the posterior tracheal wall. Our case showed that in clinically stable patients without mediastinitis and with spontaneous breathing, conservative management of tracheal tears is a safe procedure.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Intubación Intratraqueal , Laceraciones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Tráquea , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Tráquea/lesiones , Tráquea/diagnóstico por imagen , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Laceraciones/terapia , Laceraciones/etiología , Enfisema Mediastínico/etiología , Enfisema Mediastínico/terapia , Enfisema Mediastínico/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfisema Subcutáneo/etiología , Enfisema Subcutáneo/terapia , Enfisema Subcutáneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
4.
J Headache Pain ; 25(1): 72, 2024 May 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714978

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Due to the high mortality and disability rate of intracranial hemorrhage, headache is not the main focus of research on cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM), so research on headaches in AVM is still scarce, and the clinical understanding is shallow. This study aims to delineate the risk factors associated with headaches in AVM and to compare the effectiveness of various intervention treatments versus conservative treatment in alleviating headache symptoms. METHODS: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of AVMs who were treated in our institution from August 2011 to December 2021. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the risk factors for headaches in AVMs with unruptured, non-epileptic. Additionally, the effectiveness of different intervention treatments compared to conservative management in alleviating headaches was evaluated through propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 946 patients were included in the analysis of risk factors for headaches. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that female (OR 1.532, 95% CI 1.173-2.001, p = 0.002), supply artery dilatation (OR 1.423, 95% CI 1.082-1.872, p = 0.012), and occipital lobe (OR 1.785, 95% CI 1.307-2.439, p < 0.001) as independent risk factors for the occurrence of headaches. There were 443 AVMs with headache symptoms. After propensity score matching, the microsurgery group (OR 7.27, 95% CI 2.82-18.7 p < 0.001), stereotactic radiosurgery group(OR 9.46, 95% CI 2.26-39.6, p = 0.002), and multimodality treatment group (OR 8.34 95% CI 2.87-24.3, p < 0.001) demonstrate significant headache relief compared to the conservative group. However, there was no significant difference between the embolization group (OR 2.24 95% CI 0.88-5.69, p = 0.091) and the conservative group. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified potential risk factors for headaches in AVMs and found that microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and multimodal therapy had significant benefits in headache relief compared to conservative treatment. These findings provide important guidance for clinicians when developing treatment options that can help improve overall treatment outcomes and quality of life for patients.


Asunto(s)
Cefalea , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales , Humanos , Femenino , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/complicaciones , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas Intracraneales/terapia , Masculino , Cefalea/etiología , Cefalea/terapia , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Adolescente
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(18): e37896, 2024 May 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701288

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Low-velocity penetrating head injury (PHI) is rare, comprising 0.2% to 0.4% of head traumas, but can be devastating and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. No previous case of very-low-velocity PHI due to self-inflicted stabbing with a gimlet has been reported. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 62-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with bleeding head and abdominal wounds after stabbing his abdomen with a gimlet, and then hammering the same gimlet into his forehead and removing the gimlet himself. DIAGNOSES: Upon examination at admission, stab wounds were present on the forehead and the right upper quadrant. Computed tomography (CT) of the head revealed a bone defect in the left frontal bone and showed the intracranial path of the gimlet surrounded by mild hemorrhage and pneumocephalus. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed a small amount of hemorrhage with pneumocephalus but no vascular injury. INTERVENTIONS: Conservative treatment without surgery. OUTCOMES: Follow-up MRI on hospital day 58 showed no abscess or traumatic intracranial aneurysm. The patient achieved full recovery of motor and mental functions with conservative treatment and was discharged on hospital day 69. LESSONS: Very-low-velocity PHI might be successfully treated with conservative treatment.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Penetrantes de la Cabeza , Heridas Punzantes , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos Penetrantes de la Cabeza/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Penetrantes de la Cabeza/complicaciones , Traumatismos Penetrantes de la Cabeza/psicología , Heridas Punzantes/complicaciones , Heridas Punzantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Conducta Autodestructiva/psicología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos
6.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 317, 2024 May 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740620

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To review the literature on the topic, to suggest a common line of treatment applicable across a wide community of specialists, and to contribute in maintaining the high level of interest in this disease. METHODS: A comprehensive and exhaustive review of the literature was performed, identifying hundreds of articles on the topic. RESULTS: Peyronie's disease is a condition that has been recognized, studied, and treated for centuries; despite this, if one excludes surgery in cases in which the deformity is stable, no clear treatment (or line of treatment) is available for complete relief of signs and symptoms. Treatment options were divided into local, oral, and injection therapy, and a wide variety of drugs, remedies, and options were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy, vacuum therapy, penile traction therapy, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, hyaluronic acid, and collagenase of Clostridium histolyticum may be recommended only in specific contexts. Further studies on individual options or potential combinations are required.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Induración Peniana , Induración Peniana/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Tratamiento con Ondas de Choque Extracorpóreas/métodos , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 5/uso terapéutico , Tracción/métodos , Ácido Hialurónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Hialurónico/uso terapéutico , Colagenasa Microbiana/uso terapéutico , Colagenasa Microbiana/administración & dosificación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
7.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 379, 2024 May 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745277

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers that predict the treatment response in patients with knee osteoarthritis are scarce. This study aimed to investigate the potential role of synovial fluid cell counts and their ratios as biomarkers of primary knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: This retrospective study investigated 96 consecutive knee osteoarthritis patients with knee effusion who underwent joint fluid aspiration analysis and received concomitant intra-articular corticosteroid injections and blood tests. The monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were calculated. After 6 months of treatment, patients were divided into two groups: the responder group showing symptom resolution, defined by a visual analog scale (VAS) score of ≤ 3, without additional treatment, and the non-responder group showing residual symptoms, defined by a VAS score of > 3 and requiring further intervention, such as additional medication, repeated injections, or surgical treatment. Unpaired t-tests and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted between the two groups to predict treatment response after conservative treatment. The predictive value was calculated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the optimal cutoff value was determined. RESULTS: Synovial fluid MLR was significantly higher in the non-responder group compared to the responder group (1.86 ± 1.64 vs. 1.11 ± 1.37, respectively; p = 0.02). After accounting for confounding variables, odds ratio of non-responder due to increased MLR were 1.63 (95% confidence interval: 1.11-2.39). The optimal MLR cutoff value for predicting patient response to conservative treatment was 0.941. CONCLUSIONS: MLR may be a potential biomarker for predicting the response to conservative treatment in patients with primary knee osteoarthritis.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Linfocitos , Monocitos , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Líquido Sinovial , Humanos , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Líquido Sinovial/citología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Biomarcadores/análisis , Biomarcadores/sangre , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Recuento de Leucocitos
8.
Gulf J Oncolog ; 1(45): 15-29, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38774929

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To determine the proportion of radiationinduced pneumonitis and pericarditis in patients who have received Hypo-fractionated Radiation along with simultaneous integrated boost technique after breast conservative surgery using a prospective observational study from a tertiary hospital. MATERIALS & METHODS: The incidence of radiationinduced pneumonitis and pericarditis was evaluated in all adult patients with biopsy-proven early-stage unilateral breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by hypo-fractionated radiation with a simultaneous integrated boost technique. Baseline assessments including a six-minute walk test, highresolution computed tomography (HRCT), pulmonary function tests (PFTs), electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography (ECHO) were performed. At three months post-radiation treatment, patients underwent follow-up assessments with a six-minute walk test, ECG and ECHO. At six months post-radiation treatment, patients underwent further assessments with a six-minute walk test, ECG, ECHO, PFTs, and HRCT of the thorax. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 19. RESULTS: Our study investigated the incidence of acute radiation-induced pneumonitis and pericarditis in patients treated with hypofractionated VMAT-SIB technique in 20 eligible early breast cancer patients. The study found that the technique is feasible and achieves encouraging dosimetric parameters, including well achieved ipsilateral lung and heart doses. The reduced treatment time of 3-4 weeks compared to the previous 6-7 weeks with sequential boost was also found to be desirable in resource-constrained settings. The incidence of acute radiation pneumonitis and pericarditis was acceptable and comparable to existing data, with 90% of patients experiencing grade 1 radiation pneumonitis according to CTCAE v5.0. Post-treatment pulmonary function tests showed significant changes, particularly in patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and nodal irradiation. The six-minute walk test and Borg scale also showed a significant positive correlation with pulmonary function tests. There was no significant pericarditis during the follow-up. The study proposes that the hypofractionated radiotherapy using VMAT-SIB is a suitable alternative to conventional fractionation, with acceptable acute toxicities, but longer follow-up is required to assess the impact on late toxicities. CONCLUSION: Our research has shown that hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy with SIB is a safe and feasible treatment for patients with early breast cancer. This treatment method doesn't pose any significant short-term risks to the lungs or heart, and the SIB technique provides better coverage, conformity and sparing of organs at risk. Additionally, patients have reported positive cosmetic outcomes with this treatment. However, to make more accurate conclusions, we need to conduct further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods to evaluate the potential longterm side effects of this treatment using VMAT in whole breast radiation.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Pericarditis , Neumonitis por Radiación , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Pericarditis/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neumonitis por Radiación/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Mastectomía Segmentaria/métodos
9.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 316, 2024 May 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807217

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Humeral shaft fractures, constituting 3-5% of musculoskeletal injuries, are commonly managed conservatively using functional braces. However, this approach may not be feasible in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes of nonoperative treatment for humeral shaft fractures in adults utilizing a U-shaped slab. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted from August 2021 to August 2022 involving 16-year-old and older individuals who received nonsurgical treatment for humeral shaft fractures at public tertiary hospitals in Rwanda. The assessment focused on various functional outcomes, including alignment, union rate, range of motion, return to activities of daily living, and DASH score. RESULTS: The study included 73 participants, predominantly males (73.9%), with a median age of 33 years. The union rate was high at 89.04%, and 10.96% experienced delayed union. Radial nerve palsy occurred in 4.11% of patients, but all the patients fully recovered within three months. Despite angular deformities during healing in the majority of participants, these deformities did not significantly impact functional outcomes. According to the international classification of disabilities, 77% of participants achieved a good functional grade. CONCLUSION: The conservative U-shaped slab method was effective at managing humeral shaft fractures. However, optimal results necessitate careful participant selection and comprehensive rehabilitation education. Implementing these measures can improve the overall success of nonoperative management.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Húmero , Humanos , Fracturas del Húmero/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Rwanda , Estudios de Cohortes , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Actividades Cotidianas , Recuperación de la Función , Curación de Fractura , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Configuración de Recursos Limitados
10.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1374711, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38808111

RESUMEN

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the benefits of adrenalectomy and conservative treatment for comorbidities associated with mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) in patients diagnosed with MACS. Background: MACS is the most common benign hormone-secreting functional adrenal incidentaloma. Overproduction of cortisol is observed in MACS patients, resulting in a variety of long-term health issues, including arterial hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, obesity, and osteoporosis; however, the classic clinical manifestations of Cushing's syndrome (CS) are not present. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Sciences, and Scopus databases on December, 2023. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the included articles. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the beneficial effects of adrenalectomy versus conservative management for MACS-related comorbidities. Results: Fifteen articles were included in this study, which evaluated 933 MACS patients (384 Adrenalectomy and 501 Conservative treatment, and 48 excluded due to incomplete follow-up duration). MACS diagnosis criteria were different among the included articles. All studies, however, stated that there must be no overt CS symptoms. Meta-analysis demonstrates the overall advantage of adrenalectomy over conservative treatment for MACS-related comorbidities (Cohen's d = -0.49, 95% CI [-0.64, -0.34], p = 0.00). Subgroup analysis indicated that the systolic blood pressure (pooled effect size = -0.81, 95% CI [-1.19, -0.42], p = 0.03), diastolic blood pressure (pooled effect size = -0.63, 95% CI [-1.05, -0.21], p = 0.01), and BMD (pooled effect size = -0.40, 95% CI [-0.73, -0.07], p = 0.02) were significantly in favor of adrenalectomy group rather than conservative treatment but no significant differences between the two treatment groups in other MACS-related comorbidities were reported. Conclusion: Despite the limited and diverse data, this study demonstrates the advantage of adrenalectomy over conservative treatment for MACS-related comorbidities.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales , Adrenalectomía , Tratamiento Conservador , Hidrocortisona , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/metabolismo , Hidrocortisona/sangre , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/cirugía , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/metabolismo , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/terapia , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Síndrome de Cushing/cirugía , Síndrome de Cushing/metabolismo , Síndrome de Cushing/terapia , Hipertensión/epidemiología
11.
Hum Reprod ; 39(6): 1231-1238, 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719783

RESUMEN

STUDY QUESTION: What are the pregnancy and obstetric outcomes in women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) or early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) managed conservatively for fertility preservation? SUMMARY ANSWER: The study found a live birth rate of 62% in patients with AH or EC after conservative treatment, with higher level of labour induction, caesarean section, and post-partum haemorrhage. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Fertility-sparing treatment is a viable option for women with AH or EC during childbearing years, but the outcomes of such treatments, especially regarding pregnancy and obstetrics, need further exploration. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective cohort study analysed data from January 2010 to October 2022, involving 269 patients from the French national register of patients with fertility-sparing management of AH/EC. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women above 18 years of age, previously diagnosed with AH/EC, and approved for fertility preservation were included. Patients were excluded if they were registered before 2010, if their treatment began <6 months before the study, or if no medical record on the pregnancy was available. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In total, 95 pregnancies in 67 women were observed. Pregnancy was achieved using ART in 63 cases (66%) and the live birth rate was 62%, with early and late pregnancy loss at 26% and 5%, respectively. In the 59 cases resulting in a live birth, a full-term delivery occurred in 90% of cases; 36% of cases required labour induction and 39% of cases required a caesarean section. The most common maternal complications included gestational diabetes (17%) and post-partum haemorrhaging (20%). The average (±SD) birthweight was 3110 ± 736 g; there were no significant foetal malformations in the sample. No significant difference was found in pregnancy or obstetric outcomes between ART-obtained and spontaneous pregnancies. However, the incidence of induction of labour, caesarean section, and post-partum haemorrhage appears higher than in the general population. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective nature of the study may introduce bias, and the sample size might be insufficient for assessing rare obstetric complications. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study offers valuable insights for healthcare providers to guide patients who received fertility-sparing treatments for AH/EC. These pregnancies can be successful and with an acceptable live birth rate, but they seem to be managed with caution, leading to possible tendency for more caesarean sections and labour inductions. No increase in adverse obstetric outcomes was observed, with the exception of suspicion of a higher risk of post-partum haemorrhaging, to be confirmed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was received for this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Neoplasias Endometriales , Preservación de la Fertilidad , Resultado del Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Neoplasias Endometriales/complicaciones , Hiperplasia Endometrial/terapia , Hiperplasia Endometrial/complicaciones , Nacimiento Vivo , Índice de Embarazo , Hemorragia Posparto/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posparto/etiología , Hemorragia Posparto/prevención & control , Francia/epidemiología , Tasa de Natalidad , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas
12.
Jt Dis Relat Surg ; 35(2): 410-416, 2024 Mar 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38727122

RESUMEN

Congenital radial head subluxation is relatively rare and may be overlooked due to mild symptoms. The diagnosis mainly relies on imaging and history. Observation is an option for those with insignificant symptoms, while surgical intervention, such as ulnar osteotomy or arthroscopy, is often required when dysfunction exists. A 30-year-old man was admitted with congenital radial head dislocation, which was treated with manipulative repositioning. During follow-up, the patient regained the original mobility of the elbow joint and had no recurrence of dislocation. In conclusion, in adults with congenital dislocation of the radial head, we recommend conservative treatment as a first step.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Articulación del Codo , Luxaciones Articulares , Radio (Anatomía) , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Articulación del Codo/cirugía , Articulación del Codo/diagnóstico por imagen , Luxaciones Articulares/congénito , Luxaciones Articulares/terapia , Luxaciones Articulares/cirugía , Luxaciones Articulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Radio (Anatomía)/anomalías , Radio (Anatomía)/diagnóstico por imagen , Radio (Anatomía)/cirugía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Resultado del Tratamiento , Manipulación Ortopédica/métodos
13.
Neurosurg Rev ; 47(1): 236, 2024 May 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802695

RESUMEN

Pituitary apoplexy is a rare and potentially life-threatening clinical syndrome. Patients may present with severeneuro-ophthalmologic or endocrine symptoms. Current evidence is unclear whether conservative or surgicalmanagement leads to the best neuroendocrine outcomes. This study aimed to compare neuroendocrine outcomesbetween surgical and conservative treatments in a single center. Cases of patients with pituitary apoplexy whoreceived transsphenoidal surgery or conservative management in Songklanagarind Hospital between January 1,2005 and December 31, 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. A propensity score matching method was used toadjust bias from treatment selection (surgery or conservative treatment). Differences in visual field, visual acuity,cranial nerve, and endocrine outcomes between the surgical and conservative treatment groups were analyzedusing logistic regression analysis. This study included 127 patients, with 98 and 29 patients in the surgical and theconservative treatment group, respectively. The optimal matching method was used for propensity score matching.Compared to the conservative group, the surgically treated patients had a significantly higher rate of visual fieldrecovery (odds ratio (OR): 12.89, P = 0.007). However, there were no statistical differences in the recovery rate ofpreoperative visual acuity, cranial nerve, and endocrine deficits between the groups. Transsphenoidal surgery wasassociated with a higher rate of visual field recovery when compared to the conservative treatment for pituitaryapoplexy patients. Careful selection of appropriate treatment based on the patient's presentation andneuroendocrine status will result in the best outcomes while avoiding unnecessary surgical intervention.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Apoplejia Hipofisaria , Puntaje de Propensión , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Apoplejia Hipofisaria/cirugía , Apoplejia Hipofisaria/terapia , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Anciano , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Recuperación de la Función
14.
Orthopadie (Heidelb) ; 53(6): 427-437, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777842

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Isthmic spondylolysis represents the most common cause of spinal pain in adolescent athletes. This article provides an overview of the classification, diagnosis, and treatment options for these conditions, including conservative and operative measures. It also provides a treatment pathway to how young athletes with spondylolysis should be treated. DIAGNOSTICS: Diagnostic imaging techniques are essential for an accurate diagnosis, with CT scans providing additional information for surgical planning. TREATMENT: Conservative treatment focuses on activity modification and physiotherapy, with a phased approach tailored to individual patient needs. Operative intervention may be considered if conservative measures fail, with minimally invasive techniques such as Buck's screw fixation showing promising results. The decision between conservative and operative management should consider factors of the patients' individual profile. In this paper, we present the first treatment algorithm for the treatment of isthmic spondylolysis. Long-term prognosis varies, with most athletes able to return to sport following treatment.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Espondilólisis , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino , Traumatismos en Atletas/terapia , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos en Atletas/cirugía , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Paratletas , Fútbol/lesiones , Espondilólisis/terapia , Espondilólisis/diagnóstico , Espondilólisis/diagnóstico por imagen
16.
Nutrients ; 16(10)2024 May 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38794736

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease is a degenerative and increasingly prevalent condition that includes metabolic abnormalities and is associated with a higher risk of sarcopenia. The conservative approach points primarily to controlling metabolic issues and reducing the risk of malnutrition and sarcopenia, slowing the progression of kidney disease. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of a low-protein diet on malnutrition and sarcopenia. METHODS: A total of 45 patients (33 male and 12 female) aged over 70 with chronic kidney disease stage 4-5 in conservative management were considered. All patients had a dietary assessment and prescription of personalized low-protein dietary plans (≤0.6 g protein/kg) and a follow-up control between 4 and 6 months. In preliminary and follow-up evaluations, anthropometric data, blood examinations, body composition results, muscle strength, physical performance, and a 3-day food diary were collected. RESULTS: In the follow-up period, a significant weight loss (p = 0.001) and a decrease in body mass index (p = 0.002) were recorded. Food diaries revealed a significant reduction in protein, sodium, potassium, and phosphorus intake (p < 0.001), with a significant reduction in urea (p < 0.001) and proteinuria (p = 0.01) without any impact on lean mass (p = 0.66). Considerable variations in adherence between food diaries and the prescribed diet were also noted. CONCLUSIONS: Providing a personalized low-protein diet led to significant benefits in a short period without worsening the patient's nutritional status.


Asunto(s)
Dieta con Restricción de Proteínas , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Sarcopenia , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/dietoterapia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Anciano , Sarcopenia/dietoterapia , Dieta con Restricción de Proteínas/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Composición Corporal , Estado Nutricional , Desnutrición/dietoterapia , Fuerza Muscular , Pérdida de Peso
17.
Acta Orthop Belg ; 90(1): 96-101, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669657

RESUMEN

Fear of movement, pain, and loss of shoulder function are the most common problems irrespective of their approach to management after proximal humeral fracture (PHF). However, it has been unclear whether there could be differences between both treatments in early clinical outcomes. It can help physiotherapists to guide in choosing treatment approaches. This study aimed to compare kinesiophobia, pain, range of motion (ROM), shoulder function, and Quality of life (QoL) in patients treated with either conservative (CT) versus surgical (ST) after PHF. In addition, it aimed to determine correlations between fear of movement and seconder outcome measures. This cross-sectional study enrolled the patients having 5-6 weeks (being permitted active movement) after being treated either CT or ST and receiving no physical therapy. Pain, passive and active ROMs, shoulder function, fear of movement, and QoL were evaluated. 42 patients were recruited. Kinesiophobia scores were similar (p=0.55) and moderate in both groups. There was a significant difference in degrees of shoulder active flexion, active and passive abduction in favor of the CT group (p=0.05, p=0.02, p=0.04, respectively). However, there was no difference between groups regarding the remaining clinical outcomes. Furthermore, kinesiophobia showed a moderate negative correlation with energy/fatigue, social functioning, and general health. These findings showed that patients treated surgically did not have more kinesiophobia, less function, and QoL before starting physiotherapy, despite having soft tissue damage and different types of fractures. However, surgically treated patients had significantly less range of motion.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Calidad de Vida , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Fracturas del Hombro , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Fracturas del Hombro/cirugía , Fracturas del Hombro/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Miedo/psicología , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos
18.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9777, 2024 04 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38684854

RESUMEN

Few non-surgical, longitudinal studies have evaluated the relations between spinal degeneration, lumbar multifidus muscle (LMM) quality, and clinical outcomes. None have assessed the potential mediating role of the LMM between degenerative pathology and 12-month clinical outcomes. This prospective cohort study used baseline and 12-month follow-up data from 569 patients conservatively managed for low back or back-related leg pain to estimate the effects of aggregate degenerative lumbar MRI findings and LMM quality on 12-month low back and leg pain intensity (0-10) and disability (0-23) outcomes, and explored the mediating role of LMM quality between degenerative findings and 12-month clinical outcomes. Adjusted mixed effects generalized linear models separately estimated the effect of aggregate spinal pathology and LMM quality. Mediation models estimated the direct and indirect effects of pathology on leg pain, and pathology and LMM quality on leg pain, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified a leg pain rating change of 0.99 [0.14; 1.84] (unstandardized beta coefficients [95% CI]) in the presence of ≥ 4 pathologies, and a disability rating change of - 0.65 [- 0.14; - 1.16] for each 10% increase in muscle quality, but no effect on back pain intensity. Muscle quality had a non-significant mediating role (13.4%) between pathology and leg pain intensity. The number of different pathologies present demonstrated a small effect on 12-month leg pain intensity outcomes, while higher LMM quality had a direct effect on 12-month disability ratings but no mediating effect between pathology and leg pain. The relations between degenerative pathology, LMM quality, and pain-related outcomes appear complex and may include independent pathways.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Músculos Paraespinales , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Músculos Paraespinales/patología , Músculos Paraespinales/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Pierna/patología , Anciano , Vértebras Lumbares/patología , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Adulto , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/terapia , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/patología , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen
20.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 50, 2024 Apr 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38661970

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute diverticulitis with extraluminal air constitutes a heterogeneous condition whose management is controversial. The aims of this study are to report the failure rate of conservative treatment for diverticulitis with extraluminal air and to report risk factors of conservative treatment failure. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed from an institutional review board-approved database of patients admitted with acute diverticulitis with extraluminal air from 2015 to 2021 at a tertiary referral center. All patients managed for acute diverticulitis with covered perforation (without intraabdominal abscess) were included. The primary endpoint was failure of medical treatment, defined as a need for unplanned surgery or percutaneous drainage within 30 days after admission. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients (61% male, mean age 57 ± 17 years) were retrospectively included. Ten patients had failure of conservative treatment (11%). These patients were significantly older than 50 years (n = 9/10, 90% versus n = 47/83, 57%, p = 0.007), associated with cardiovascular disease (n = 6/10, 60% versus n = 10/83, 12%, p = 0.002), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3-4 (n = 4/7, 57% versus 6/33, 18%, p = 0.05), under anticoagulant and antiplatelet (n = 6/10, 60% versus n = 11/83, 13%, p = 0.04) and steroid or immunosuppressive therapy (n = 3/10, 30% versus 5/83, 6%, p = 0.04), and with distant pneumoperitoneum location (n = 7/10, 70% versus n = 14/83, 17%, p = 0.001) compared with those with successful conservative treatment. On multivariate analysis, only distant pneumoperitoneum was an independent risk factor of failure (odds ratio (OR) 6.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) [2-21], p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment with antibiotics for acute diverticulitis with extraluminal air is safe with a success rate of 89%. Patients with distant pneumoperitoneum should be carefully monitored.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Aguda , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Diverticulitis del Colon/terapia , Diverticulitis del Colon/complicaciones , Drenaje/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA