Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.239
Filtrar
1.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 183, 2024 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38877409

RESUMEN

The Russia-Ukraine war is associated with critical and severe thoracoabdominal injuries. A more specific approach to treating patients with thoracoabdominal injury should also include minimally invasive technologies. It remains unclear about the utility of using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and laparoscopy in patients with thoracoabdominal injury. The aim of this study was to investigate and evaluate the utility of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, laparoscopy as well as magnetic tool applications for the management of severe thoracoabdominal injury in combat patients injured in the ongoing war in Ukraine and treated in the Role 2 deployed hospital. Patients and methods 36 male combat patients thoracoabdominal injury were identified for the study during the first 100 days from February, 24 2022. These individuals were diagnosed with thoracoabdominal GSW in the Role 2 hospital (i.e. deployed military hospital) of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery (VATS) and laparoscopy with application of surgical magnetic tools were applied with regards to the damage control resuscitation and damage control surgery. Results In 10 (28%) patients, VATS was applied to remove the metal foreign body fragments. Both thoracotomy and laparotomy were performed in 20 (56%) hemodynamically unstable patients. Of these 20 patients, the suturing of the liver was performed in 8 (22%) patients, whereas peri-hepatic gauze packing in 12 (33%) patients. Massive injury to the liver and PI 2.0-3.0 were diagnosed in 2 (6%) patients. Lethal outcome was in 1 (2.8%) patient. Conclusions Thoracoabdominal gunshot injuries might be managed at Role 2 hospitals by using video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) and laparoscopy accompanied by surgical magnetic tools. Damage control surgery and damage control resuscitation must be applied for patients in critical and severe conditions.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Laparoscopía , Traumatismos Torácicos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Ucrania , Masculino , Adulto , Traumatismos Torácicos/cirugía , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Hospitales Militares , Adulto Joven , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Laparotomía/métodos
2.
J Surg Res ; 298: 341-346, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663260

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Hospital overcrowding is common and can lead to delays in intensive care unit (ICU) admission, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality in medical and surgical patients. Data on delayed ICU admission are limited in the postsurgical trauma cohort. Damage control laparotomy with temporary abdominal closure (DCL-TAC) for severely injured patients is often followed by an aggressive early resuscitation phase, usually occurring in the ICU. We hypothesized that patients who underwent DCL-TAC with initial postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay would have worse outcomes than those directly admitted to ICU. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified all trauma patients who underwent DCL-TAC at a level 1 trauma center over a 5 y period. Demographics, injuries, and resuscitation markers at 12 and 24 h were collected. Patients were stratified by location after index laparotomy (PACU versus ICU) and compared. Outcomes included composite morbidity and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Of the 561 patients undergoing DCL-TAC, 134 (24%) patients required PACU stay due to ICU bed shortage, and 427 (76%) patients were admitted directly to ICU. There was no difference in demographics, injury severity score, time to resuscitation, complications, or mortality between PACU and ICU groups. Only 46% of patients were resuscitated at 24 h; 76% underwent eventual primary fascial closure. Under-resuscitation at 24 h (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.95, P = 0.03), increased age (AOR 1.04; 95% CI 1.02-10.55, P < 0.0001), and increased injury severity score (AOR 1.04; 95% CI 1.02-1.07, P < 0.0001) were associated with mortality on multivariable logistic regression. The median time in PACU was 3 h. CONCLUSIONS: PACU hold is not associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing DCL-TAC. While ICU was designed for the resuscitation of critically ill patients, PACU is an appropriate alternative when an ICU bed is unavailable.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Laparotomía , Tiempo de Internación , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Laparotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/mortalidad , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Adulto Joven , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo
3.
S Afr J Surg ; 62(1): 29-36, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38568123

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Selective non-operative management (SNOM) of penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT) is routinely practised in our trauma centre. This study aims to report the outcomes of patients who have failed SNOM. METHODS: Patients presenting with PAT from 1 May 2015 - 31 January 2018 were reviewed. They were categorised into immediate laparotomy and delayed operative management (DOM) groups. Outcomes compared were postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 944 patients with PAT were reviewed. After excluding 100 patients undergoing damage control surgery, 402 (47.6%) and 542 (52.4%) were managed non-operatively and operatively, respectively. In the SNOM cohort, 359 (89.3%) were managed successfully without laparotomy. Thirty-seven (86.0%) patients in the DOM group had a therapeutic laparotomy, and six (14.0%) had an unnecessary laparotomy. Nine (20.9%) patients in the DOM group developed complications. The DOM group had lesser complications. However, the two groups had no difference in hospital length of stay (LOS). There was no mortality in the non-operative management (NOM) group. CONCLUSION: In this study, we demonstrated no mortality and less morbidity in the DOM group when appropriately selected compared to the immediate laparotomy group. This supports the selective NOM approach for PAT in high volume trauma centres.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Humanos , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Laparotomía , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Centros Traumatológicos
4.
Surg Clin North Am ; 104(2): 437-449, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453312

RESUMEN

This article delves into the role of minimally invasive surgeries in trauma, specifically laparoscopy and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). It discusses the benefits of laparoscopy over traditional laparotomy, including its accuracy in detecting peritoneal violation and intraperitoneal injuries caused by penetrating trauma. The article also explores the use of laparoscopy as an adjunct to nonoperative management of abdominal injuries and in cases of blunt trauma with unclear abdominal injuries. Furthermore, it highlights the benefits of VATS in diagnosing and treating thoracic injuries, such as traumatic diaphragmatic injuries, retained hematomas, and persistent pneumothorax.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Laparoscopía , Traumatismos Torácicos , Heridas Penetrantes , Humanos , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Torácicos/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía
5.
Am J Surg ; 233: 90-93, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38413352

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of blunt abdominal injury (BAI) in the adult population has been estimated to be between 0.03% and 4.95%. However, the impact of BAI on the pediatric population remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of National Trauma Data Bank datasets for the years 2017-2019. We included patients under the age of 18 who experienced blunt trauma and had suffered a blunt abdominal injury with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) severity score of 2 or higher. RESULTS: Out of the 8064 pediatric patients with isolated abdominal trauma, 134 patients also suffered from BAI. We found no difference in the outcomes of patients with blunt adrenal injury in terms of mortality, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital, and the number of ventilator days. Within poly-trauma patients BAI was associated with worst patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that BAI has minimal clinical impact on patient outcomes in isolation. However it is associated with worst outcomes in poly trauma patients suggesting correlation with increased trauma burden. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Glándulas Suprarrenales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/mortalidad , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Glándulas Suprarrenales/lesiones , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Preescolar , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismo Múltiple/epidemiología , Traumatismo Múltiple/mortalidad , Escala Resumida de Traumatismos
6.
J Am Coll Surg ; 238(6): 1106-1114, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38323622

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of pediatric patients with high-grade blunt pancreatic injury (BPI) involving the main pancreatic duct remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the nationwide trends in the management of pediatric high-grade BPI at pediatric (PTC), mixed (MTC), and adult trauma centers (ATC). STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational study of the National Trauma Data Bank. We included pediatric patients (age 16 years or less) sustaining high-grade BPI (Abbreviated Injury Scale 3 or more) from 2011 to 2021. Patients who did not undergo pancreatic operation were categorized into the nonoperative management (NOM) group. Trauma centers were defined as PTC (level I/II pediatric only), MTC (level I/II adult and pediatric), and ATC (level I/II adult only). Primary outcome was the proportion of patients undergoing NOM, and secondary outcomes included the use of ERCP and in-hospital mortality. A Cochran-Armitage test was used to analyze the trend. RESULTS: A total of 811 patients were analyzed. The median age was 9 years (interquartile range 6 to 13), 64% were male patients, and the median injury severity score was 17 (interquartile range 10 to 25). During the study period, there was a significant upward linear trend in the use of NOM and ERCP among the overall cohort (range 48% to 66%; p trend = 0.033, range 6.1% to 19%; p trend = 0.030, respectively). The significant upward trend for NOM was maintained in the subgroup of patients at PTC and MTC (p trend = 0.037), whereas no significant trend was observed at ATC (p trend = 0.61). There was no significant trend in in-hospital mortality (p trend = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: For the management of pediatric patients with high-grade BPI, this study found a significant trend toward increasing use of NOM and ERCP without mortality deterioration, especially at PTC and MTC.


Asunto(s)
Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Páncreas , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Niño , Adolescente , Páncreas/lesiones , Páncreas/cirugía , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia , Traumatismos Abdominales/mortalidad , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía
7.
Surgery ; 175(5): 1424-1431, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38402039

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal infection is a common complication of blunt abdominal trauma. Early detection and intervention can reduce the incidence of intra-abdominal infection and improve patients' prognoses. This study aims to construct a clinical model predicting postsurgical intra-abdominal infection after blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of 553 patients with blunt abdominal trauma from the Department of General Surgery of 7 medical centers (2011-2021). A 7:3 ratio was used to assign patients to the derivation and validation cohorts. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether intra-abdominal infection occurred after blunt abdominal trauma. Multivariate logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were used to select variables to establish a nomogram. The nomogram was evaluated, and the validity of the model was further evaluated by the validation cohort. RESULTS: A total of 113 were diagnosed with intra-abdominal infection (20.4%). Age, prehospital time, C-reactive protein, injury severity score, operation duration, intestinal injury, neutrophils, and antibiotic use were independent risk factors for intra-abdominal infection in blunt abdominal trauma patients (P < .05). The area under the receiver operating curve (area under the curve) of derivation cohort and validation cohort was 0.852 (95% confidence interval, 0.784-0.912) and 0.814 (95% confidence interval, 0.751-0.902). The P value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was .135 and .891 in the 2 cohorts. The calibration curve demonstrated that the nomogram had a high consistency between prediction and practical observation. The decision curve analysis also showed that the nomogram had a better potential for clinical application. To facilitate clinical application, we have developed an online at https://nomogramcgz.shinyapps.io/IAIrisk/. CONCLUSION: The nomogram is helpful in predicting the risk of postoperative intra-abdominal infection in patients with blunt abdominal trauma and provides guidance for clinical decision-making and treatment.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Infecciones Intraabdominales , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Nomogramas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Intraabdominales/diagnóstico , Infecciones Intraabdominales/etiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía
8.
Am J Surg ; 231: 125-131, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38309996

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Algorithms for managing penetrating abdominal trauma are conflicting or vague regarding the role of laparoscopy. We hypothesized that laparoscopy is underutilized among hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal stab wounds. METHODS: Trauma Quality Improvement Program data (2016-2019) were used to identify stable (SBP ≥110 and GCS ≥13) patients ≥16yrs with stab wounds and an abdominal procedure within 24hr of admission. Patients with a non-abdominal AIS ≥3 or missing outcome information were excluded. Patients were analyzed based on index procedure approach: open, therapeutic laparoscopy (LAP), or LAP-conversion to open (LCO). Center, clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared according to surgical approach and abdominal AIS using non-parametric analysis. RESULTS: 5984 patients met inclusion criteria with 7 â€‹% and 8 â€‹% receiving therapeutic LAP and LCO, respectively. The conversion rate for patients initially treated with LAP was 54 â€‹%. Compared to conversion or open, therapeutic LAP patients had better outcomes including shorter ICU and hospital stays and less infection complications, but were younger and less injured. Assessing by abdominal AIS eliminated ISS differences, meanwhile LAP patients still had shorter hospital stays. At time of admission, 45 â€‹% of open patients met criteria for initial LAP opportunity as indicated by comparable clinical presentation as therapeutic laparoscopy patients. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable patients, laparoscopy remains infrequently utilized despite its increasing inclusion in current guidelines. Additional opportunity exists for therapeutic laparoscopy in trauma, which appears to be a viable alternative to open surgery for select injuries from abdominal stab wounds. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Laparoscopía , Heridas Penetrantes , Heridas Punzantes , Humanos , Laparotomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas Punzantes/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/etiología
9.
Asian J Surg ; 47(1): 269-273, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37648540

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study the diagnosis, management strategies, and outcomes of pediatric patients with blunt pancreatic injury. METHODS: The clinical data of patients with blunt pancreatic injury at Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2011 to September 2022 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were enrolled. According to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification of pancreatic injury, 41 patients were categorized in the low-grade and nine in the high-grade groups. On admission, serum amylase and lipase levels in the high-grade group were significantly higher than in the low-grade group (P = 0.025 and P = 0.021, respectively). The peak levels of serum amylase and lipase in the high-grade group were considerably higher than in the low-grade group (P = 0.017 and P = 0.038, respectively). Two patients received surgical treatment, but none experienced pancreatectomy. The remaining 49 patients were successfully treated with conservative methods. The incidence of pancreatic pseudocysts in patients was 47.1% (24/51), and half required external drainage. CONCLUSION: Conservative management is safe for most children with blunt pancreatic injury, surgical intervention should be adopted in patients with hemodynamic instability or multiple organ failure.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Páncreas/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Lipasa , Amilasas
10.
Am J Emerg Med ; 76: 199-206, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38086186

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The advancement of seat belts have been essential to reducing morbidity and mortality related to motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). The "seat belt sign" (SBS) is an important physical exam finding that has guided management for decades. This study, comprising a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis, asses the current literature for the likelihood of the SBS relating to intra-abdominal injury and surgical intervention. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from their beginnings through August 4, 2023 for eligible studies. Outcomes included the prevalence of intra-abdominal injury and need for surgical intervention. Cochrane's Risk of Bias (RoB) tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were applied to assess risk of bias and study quality; Q-statistics and I2 values were used to assess for heterogeneity. RESULTS: The search yielded nine observational studies involving 3050 patients, 1937 (63.5%) of which had a positive SBS. The pooled prevalence of any intra-abdominal injury was 0.42, (95% CI 0.28-0.58, I2 = 96%) The presence of a SBS was significantly associated with increased odds of intra-abdominal injury (OR 3.62, 95% CI 1.12-11.6, P = 0.03; I2 = 89%), and an increased likelihood of surgical intervention (OR 7.34, 95% CI 2.03-26.54, P < 0.001; I2 = 29%). The measurement for any intra-abdominal injury was associated with high heterogeneity, I2 = 89%. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that the presence of a SBS was associated with a statistically significant higher likelihood of intra-abdominal injury and need for surgical intervention. The study had high heterogeneity, likely due to the technological advancements over the course of this study, including seat belt design and diagnostic imaging sensitivity. Further studies with more recent data are needed to confirm these results.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Cinturones de Seguridad , Humanos , Prevalencia , Cinturones de Seguridad/efectos adversos , Accidentes de Tránsito , Traumatismos Abdominales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/etiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
12.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 96(5): 820-830, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38111096

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Avoiding missed diagnosis and therapeutic delay for significant blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries (sBBMIs) after trauma is still challenging despite the widespread use of computed tomography (CT). Several scoring tools aiming at reducing this risk have been published. The purpose of the present work was to assess the incidence of delayed (>24 hours) diagnosis for sBBMI patients and to compare the predictive performance of three previously published scores using clinical, radiological, and laboratory findings: the Bowel Injury Prediction Score (BIPS) and the scores developed by Raharimanantsoa Score (RS) and by Faget Score (FS). METHODS: A population-based retrospective observational cohort study was conducted; it included adult trauma patients after road traffic crashes admitted to Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland, between 2008 and 2019 (n = 1,258) with reliable information about sBBMI status (n = 1,164) and for whom all items for score calculation were available (n = 917). The three scores were retrospectively applied on all patients to assess their predictive performance. RESULTS: The incidence of sBBMI after road traffic crash was 3.3% (38 of 1,164), and in 18% (7 of 38), there was a diagnostic and treatment delay of more than 24 hours. The diagnostic performances of the FS, the RS, and the BIPS to predict sBBMI, expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, were 95.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.7-97.9%), 89.2% (95% CI, 83.2-95.3%), and 87.6% (95% CI, 81.8-93.3%) respectively. CONCLUSION: The present study confirms that diagnostic delays for sBBMI still occur despite the widespread use of abdominal CT. When CT findings during the initial assessment are negative or equivocal for sBBMI, using a score may be helpful to select patients for early diagnostic laparoscopy. The FS had the best individual diagnostic performance. However, the BIPS or the RS, relying on clinical and laboratory variables, may be helpful to select patients for early diagnostic laparoscopy when there are unspecific CT signs of bowel or mesenteric injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Tardío , Mesenterio , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Diagnóstico Tardío/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mesenterio/lesiones , Mesenterio/diagnóstico por imagen , Suiza/epidemiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Intestinos/lesiones , Intestinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Anciano , Incidencia
14.
J Surg Res ; 293: 57-63, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37716101

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following abdominal trauma. We hypothesized that patients undergoing definitive laparotomy (DEF) would have better PROs compared to those treated with damage control laparotomy (DCL). METHODS: The DCL Trial randomized DEF versus DCL in abdominal trauma. PROs were measured using the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D) questionnaire at discharge and six months postdischarge (1 = perfect health, 0 = death, and <0 = worse than death) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist-Civilian. Unadjusted Bayesian analysis with a neutral prior was used to assess the posterior probability of achieving minimal clinically important difference. RESULTS: Of 39 randomized patients (21 DEF versus 18 DCL), 8 patients died (7 DEF versus 1 DCL). Of those who survived, 28 completed the EQ-5D at discharge (12 DEF versus 16 DCL) and 25 at 6 mo (12 DEF versus 13 DCL). Most patients were male (79%) with a median age of 30 (interquartile range (IQR) 21-42), suffered blunt injury (56%), and were severely injured (median injury severity score 33, IQR 21 - 42). Median EQ-5D value at discharge was 0.20 (IQR 0.06 - 0.52) DEF versus 0.31 (IQR -0.03 - 0.43) DCL, and at six months 0.51 (IQR 0.30 - 0.74) DEF versus 0.50 (IQR 0.28 - 0.84) DCL. The posterior probability of minimal clinically important difference DEF versus DCL at discharge and six months was 16% and 23%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Functional deficits for trauma patients persist beyond the acute setting regardless of laparotomy status. These deficits warrant longitudinal studies to better inform patients on recovery expectations.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Laparotomía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Cuidados Posteriores , Teorema de Bayes , Laparotomía/efectos adversos , Alta del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (11): 63-71, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés, Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38010019

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To improve the outcomes in ICU patients with blunt abdominal trauma via enteral therapy by saline enteral solution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective and prospective study included 24 patients (18 (75%) men and 6 (25%) women) with blunt abdominal trauma who underwent examination and treatment at the Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care. Age of patients ranged from 38 to 81 years (mean 50.1±13.6). RESULTS: Enteral therapy was followed by normalization of serum lactate, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase after 3 days. There were significant differences in decrease of lactate dehydrogenase, alanine aminotransferase and C-reactive protein. In the control group, these parameters decreased only by the 10th day. CONCLUSION: Inclusion of saline enteral solution into the complex therapy contributes to earlier recovery of gastrointestinal function and prevents compartment syndrome. These aspects reduced the number of patients with multiple organ failure.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Heridas no Penetrantes , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Alanina Transaminasa , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia
16.
BMC Surg ; 23(1): 357, 2023 Nov 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37990208

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Abdominal trauma is one of the common reasons for emergency visits yet there is paucity of data about the subject in the horn of Africa. This study was aimed at determining the determinants of adverse management outcomes of blunt abdominal trauma among operated patients at Wolaita Sodo University Teaching and Referral Hospital, Ethiopia. METHODS: This was a three-year retrospective review conducted among 128 patient records selected using purposive sampling in which all records for the patients operated for a diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma during the study period were included. A pretested checklist was used to extract the data relating to adverse outcomes and characteristics of the patients. A descriptive analysis followed by logistic regression was done. RESULTS: Of the 128 patients, adverse management outcomes related to blunt abdominal trauma occurred in 52%. Patients residing in rural areas (adjusted odds ratio 3.23, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-9.24) and those with tachycardia, (adjusted odds ratio = 3.25, 95% confidence interval: 1.19-8.83) or tachypnea (adjusted odds ratio 3.25, 95% confidence interval: 1.19-8.83) were more likely to have adverse management outcomes. CONCLUSION: Adverse management outcomes are relatively high and associated with rural residence and deranged vital signs (tachycardia and tachypnea). Close monitoring targeting patients from rural residence and those presenting with tachycardia and tachypnea is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Etiopía/epidemiología , Derivación y Consulta , Hospitales , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Taquicardia , Taquipnea
17.
Sud Med Ekspert ; 66(5): 53-55, 2023.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37796462

RESUMEN

The algorithm of spleen and sterno-vertebrocostal segment models creation, the use of which allows to simulate various variants of conditions of spleen damage occurrence, is proposed. These data can be used for simulation of blunt abdominal trauma as a part of situational forensic medical examinations production. The results of performed experimental works on this issue showed the efficacy and adequacy of created models, which makes implementation of spleen injuries modelling into routine forensic medical expert practice promising.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Bazo , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/etiología , Algoritmos , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Simulación por Computador
18.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(10)2023 Sep 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37893431

RESUMEN

Abdominal injuries in children caused by guns are a rare clinical entity globally. But, in countries with undefined legal regulations and in war zones, urban violence is a tremendous social problem among older children and adolescents. This manuscript provides details regarding two cases of severe gunshot injuries in young children. The injuries were very complicated and included damage to the parenchymatous and hollow organs and major blood vessels. The clinical presentation on admission was severe and dramatic, but the patients survived. However, one patient developed numerous complications that required repeated surgical interventions and long treatment. This article provides a detailed description of injuries and how to treat them. Patient care requires a multidisciplinary approach, and the initial decision on further treatment depends on the patient's hemodynamic stability.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Niño , Adolescente , Humanos , Preescolar , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/complicaciones , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA