[Multiple ileal neuroendocrine tumors 10mm in diameter with lymph node metastasis detected on endoscopy:a case report].

A 53-year-old man with an abnormal routine physical examination was referred to our hospital. Colonoscopy showed a 5-mm submucosal tumor that was 7cm proximal to the ileocecal valve. It was identified as a neuroendocrine tumor (NET) on biopsy. Preoperatively, we conducted a double balloon endoscopy to examine the entire small intestine. Another 7-mm submucosal tumor was found on the ileocecal valve, which was missed during the first colonoscopy. A final diagnosis of multiple ileal NETs (<10mm in diameter) was made, and the patient underwent ileocecal resection with lymphadenectomy. Histopathological evaluation of the surgical specimen verified the diagnosis of NET Grade 1 with submucosal invasion. Metastasis to lymph node #202 was also detected. He remained relapse-free for 5 years and 5 months after the operation. In conclusion, this was a case of multiple ileal NETs (<10mm in diameter) with lymph node metastasis that could not be detected preoperatively on contrast-enhanced computed tomography. This case highlights the significance of detailed endoscopic observation of the terminal ileum.

When is neoadjuvant chemotherapy indicated in rectal neuroendocrine tumors? An analysis of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (rNET) are rare and challenging to manage. While most patients with small rNET can be definitively treated with local excision, the role of chemotherapy in general and neoadjuvant therapy particularly in managing advanced rNET has not been well established. Therefore, this study aimed to determine which patients with rNET may gain a survival benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients who underwent surgical resection of rNET in the US National Cancer Database (NCDB) (2004-2019) was performed. First, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors of poor overall survival (OS) and define the high-risk groups. Afterward, stratified OS analyses were performed for each high-risk group to assess whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a survival benefit in each group. RESULTS: A total of 1837 patients (49.8% female; mean age 56.6 ± 12.3 years) underwent radical resection of a rNET. Tumors > 20 mm in size, clinical T4 tumors, poorly differentiated tumors, and metastatic disease were independent predictors of worse OS and were defined as high-risk groups. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not have a significant survival benefit in any of the high-risk groups, except for patients with high-grade rNETs where neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved OS to a mean of 30.9 months compared with 15.9 months when neoadjuvant therapy was not given (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved the OS of patients with high-grade rNET by 15 months and may be indicated for this group.

Treatment strategies for borderline resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are a group of rare, heterogeneous tumors that originate in the endocrine tissue of the pancreas and account for 1-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. The majority of pNETs are non-functional and typically follow a more indolent course. Especially at early stages, the primary management of pNETs is surgical resection which is associated with relatively low rates of recurrence and excellent long-term prognosis. On the other hand, some patients will present with locally advanced primary tumors or low volume metastatic disease in which complete surgical resection may be more difficult to achieve and recurrence rates are significant. Unlike treatment of borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic adenocarcinoma, in which neoadjuvant treatment strategies are becoming standardized, borderline resectability is not a currently established terminology for pNETs and the optimal multidisciplinary treatment approach is poorly understood. METHODS: We performed a literature search on PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov using keywords, including 'pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor' and 'borderline resectable'. All studies and review articles in English with full text were considered. Each publication was independently reviewed. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: We introduce the concept of BR-pNETs, focusing on important criteria that should be included in their definition by balancing the feasibility of resection and the clinical utility of surgery. We suggest that extended resection, involving vascular reconstruction, adjacent organ resection, and/or liver metastasis, should be considered at experienced, high volume centers. Furthermore, we outline multidisciplinary treatment strategies, including systemic and locoregional treatment options, for optimizing outcomes for this growing patient population. CONCLUSIONS: Formalizing the definition of resectability in pNETs through multidisciplinary collaborative research will be important for standardizing the indications for multimodality treatment and aggressive surgical approaches for patients.

111 In-Pentetreotide-Guided Radiosurgery for Intraoperative Localization of Retroperitoneal Nodal Metastasis in a Patient With Ileal Neuroendocrine Tumor.

ABSTRACT: 64 Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT of a 44-year-old man with an ileal neuroendocrine tumor demonstrated the primary tumor, local nodal metastases, and a pericaval nodal metastasis. Localization of the pericaval node during surgery may be difficult, thus 4.4 mCi of 111 In-pentetreotide was administered before surgery to assist with localization and resection. At surgery, the pericaval nodal metastasis was readily detected by gamma probe, which could then be resected and pathologically proven to be a metastasis. This demonstrates the use of somatostatin receptor-targeted imaging for intraoperative localization of an otherwise difficult to surgically localize metastasis. Without intraoperative somatostatin receptor-targeted radiosurgery, disease may have been incompletely resected.

[Acidophil stem cell pituitary neuroendocrine tumors/adenoma: a clinicopathological analysis of five cases].

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of acidophil stem cell pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET)/adenoma. Methods: Five cases of acidophil stem cell PitNET/adenoma were diagnosed between May 2022 and July 2023 at the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. The clinicopathological features of the tumor were analyzed by using histology, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy. The relevant literature was reviewed. Results: There were 1 male and 4 females, aged from 23 to 69 years. Patient 3 was 55 years old at the time of diagnosis and first surgery, and relapsed 5 years later. The patients' median age was 32 years. Patients 1 and 5 showed elevated blood prolactin, with various degrees of hormonal symptoms except Patient 3, who showed only tumor compression symptoms. Imaging studies showed that all cases involved the sellar floor. The tumors of Patients 1, 2 and 5 were closely related to the cavernous sinus segment of the internal carotid artery. The tumors exhibited a diffuse growth pattern with chromophobic to slightly acidophilic cytoplasm. A few of tumor cells showed chromophobic cytoplasm. The nucleoli were conspicuous. Intranuclear inclusion bodies and variably-sized clear vacuoles were observed occasionally. Under electron microscope, marked mitochondrial abnormalities were observed, including increased mitochondria number, expanded hypertrophy, and absence of mitochondrial ridge fracture. Some mitochondrial matrices were dense, while some were vacuolated. Conclusions: Acidophil stem cell PitNET/adenoma is a rare type of pituitary adenomas/PitNETs. It often has a more clinically aggressive manner with immature cells, diffuse expression of PIT1, prolactin, and varying degrees of growth hormone expression. Because of the obvious diversity of their clinical hormone status and hormone immune expression, the diagnosis of this type tumor is still a challenge.

Surgery for advanced neuroendocrine tumours of the small bowel: recommendations based on a consensus meeting of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES).

BACKGROUND: Small bowel neuroendocrine tumours often present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The aim of this paper is to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding (controversial) topics in the surgical management of advanced small bowel neuroendocrine tumours. METHODS: A working group of experts was formed by the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons. The group addressed 11 clinically relevant questions regarding surgery for advanced disease, including the benefit of primary tumour resection, the role of cytoreduction, the extent of lymph node clearance, and the management of an unknown primary tumour. A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE to identify papers addressing the research questions. Final recommendations were presented and voted upon by European Society of Endocrine Surgeons members at the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons Conference in Mainz in 2023. RESULTS: The literature review yielded 1223 papers, of which 84 were included. There were no randomized controlled trials to address any of the research questions and therefore conclusions were based on the available case series, cohort studies, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses of the available non-randomized studies. The proposed recommendations were scored by 38-51 members and rated 'strongly agree' or 'agree' by 64-96% of participants. CONCLUSION: This paper provides recommendations based on the best available evidence and expert opinion on the surgical management of locally advanced and metastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumours.

[Premalignant cystic neoplasms and neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreatic head-Is the Kausch-Whipple resection an adequate treatment?] / Prämaligne, zystische Neoplasien und neuroendokrine Tumoren des Pankreaskopfes ­ Ist die Kausch-Whipple-Resektion eine adäquate Therapie?

Currently, the most frequently used surgical treatment for symptomatic, benign, premalignant cystic and neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreatic head is the Whipple procedure or pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). However, when performed for treatment of benign tumors, PD is a multiorgan resection involving loss of pancreatic and extrapancreatic tissue and functions. PD for benign neoplasm is associated with the risk of considerable early postoperative complications and an in-hospital mortality of up to 5%. Following the Whipple procedure a new onset of diabetes mellitus is observed in 14-20% and new exocrine insufficiency in 25-45%, leading to metabolic dysfunction and impairment of quality of life persisting after resection of benign tumors. Symptomatic neoplasms are indication for surgery. Patients with asymptomatic pancreatic tumors are treated according to the criteria of surveillance protocols. The goal of surgical treatment for asymptomatic patients is, according to the guideline criteria, interruption of the surveillance program before the development of an advanced stage cancer associated with the neoplasm. Tumor enucleation and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection, either total or partial, are parenchyma-sparing resections for benign neoplasms of the pancreatic head. The first choice for small tumors is enucleation; however, enucleation is associated with an increased risk of pancreatic fistula B + C following pancreatic main duct injury. Duodenum-preserving total or partial pancreatic head resection has the advantage of low postoperative surgery-related complications, a mortality of < 0.5% and maintenance of the endocrine and exocrine pancreatic functions. Parenchyma-sparing pancreatic head resections should replace classical Whipple procedures for neoplasms of the pancreatic head.

[Therapeutic efficacy analysis of endoscopic combined with serological diagnosis strategy and endoscopic in G1 and G2 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms].

Objective: To investigate the endoscopic combined serological diagnosis strategy for G1 and G2 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (G-NENs), and to evaluate the safety, short-term, and long-term efficacy of two endoscopic treatment procedures: endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 100 consecutive patients with G-NENs who were hospitalized at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2011 to October 2023. These patients underwent endoscopic treatment, and propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare clinicopathological characteristics, as well as short-term and long-term efficacy of lesions in the EMR group and ESD group before and after treatment. Results: Among the 100 patients with G-NENs, the median age was 54 years old. Before surgery, 29 cases underwent endoscopic combined serological examination, and 24 of them (82.2%) had abnormally elevated plasma chromogranin A. The combined diagnostic strategy for autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AIG) achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 100%(22/22). A total of 235 G-NEN lesions were included, with 84 in the ESD group and 151 in the EMR group. The median size of the lesions in the ESD group (5.0 mm) was significantly larger than that in the EMR group (2.0 mm, P＜0.001). Additionally, the ESD group had significantly more lesions with pathological grade G2[23.8%(20/84) vs. 1.3%(2/151), P＜0.001], infiltration depth reaching the submucosal layer [78.6%(66/84) vs. 51.0%(77/151), P＜0.001], and more T2 stage compared to the EMR group[15.5%(13/84) vs. 0.7%(1/151), P＜0.001]. After PSM, 49 pairs of lesions were successfully matched between the two groups. Following PSM, there were no significant differences in the en bloc resection rate [100.0%(49/49) vs. 100.0%(49/49)], complete resection rate [93.9%(46/49) vs. 100.0%(49/49)], and complication rate [0(0/49) vs. 4.1%(2/49)] between the two groups. During the follow-up period, no recurrence or distant metastasis was observed in any of the lesions in both groups. Conclusions: The combination of endoscopy and serology diagnostic strategy has the potential to enhance the accuracy of diagnosing G1 and G2 stage G-NENs and their background mucosa. Endoscopic resection surgery (EMR, ESD) is a proven and safe treatment approach for G1 and G2 stage G-NENs.

Optimal surgical management of unifocal vs. multifocal NF-PNETs: a respective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) represent 1-2% of pancreatic tumors, with recent guidelines recommending active surveillance for non-functioning PNETs (NF-PNETs) smaller than 2 cm. However, the management of multiple NF-PNETs, as well as the influence of tumor number on prognosis, remains under-researched. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed NF-PNET patients who underwent pancreatic resection at Severance Hospital between February 1993 and August 2023, comparing the characteristics of patients diagnosed with multifocal tumors and those with unifocal tumors. A subgroup analysis of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was performed based on multifocality employing the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Of 187 patients, 169 (90.4%) had unifocal and 18 (9.6%) had multifocal tumors. Multifocal tumors were more likely to be diffusely spread, necessitating more total pancreatectomies (diffuse tumor location: 4.7% in unifocal vs. 38.9% in multifocal cases, p < 0.001; total pancreatectomy: 4.1% in unifocal vs. 33.3% in multifocal cases, p < 0.001). In patients with NF-PNET who underwent the same extent of pancreatic resection, no significant difference in the incidence of complication was observed regardless of multifocality. Moreover, no significant difference in OS was seen between the unifocal and multifocal groups (log-rank test: p = 0.93). However, the multifocal group exhibited a poorer prognosis in terms of RFS compared to the unifocal group (log-rank test: p = 0.004) Hereditary syndrome, tumor grade, size, lymphovascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis were key factors in the recurrence. CONCLUSION: This study's findings suggest that the presence of multiple tumors was associated with poorer recurrence-free survival but did not affect long-term survival following surgery. Given the long-term oncologic outcome and quality of life following surgery, resection of tumors over 2 cm is advisable in patients with multifocal PNETs, while a cautious "wait-and-see" approach for smaller tumors (under 2 cm) can minimize the extent of resection and improve the quality of life. In cases with only small multifocal NF-PNETs (< 2 cm), immediate resection may not be crucial, but the higher recurrence rate than that in solitary NF-PNET necessitates intensified surveillance.

Analysis of 25 surgical cases of thymic neuroendocrine tumors and thymic carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics of patients who underwent surgical resection for thymic neuroendocrine tumors (TNET) or thymic carcinoma. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics of our surgical patients at Fukuoka University Hospital from January 1995 to December 2018. RESULTS: There were nine cases of TNET and 16 cases of thymic carcinoma. Regarding the pathological type, the TNET group included three atypical carcinoid cases, two large cell neuroendocrine tumor cases, two small cell carcinoma cases, and two other cases. The thymic carcinoma group included 15 squamous carcinoma cases and one case of adenosquamous carcinoma. Based on the Masaoka-Koga staging system, six TNET cases and 11 thymic carcinoma cases were stage III or IV. The complete resection rate was 77% in the TNET group and 81% in the thymic carcinoma group. Additional chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was performed in five cases of TNET and 11 cases of thymic carcinoma. The five-year survival rate and five-year disease-free survival rate were 87.5% and 75.0% in the TNET group and 58.9% and 57.1% in the thymic carcinoma group, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.248 and P = 0.894, respectively). In the univariate analysis, complete resection was a statistically significant prognostic factor (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: In this study, no difference in prognosis was observed between TNET and thymic carcinomas. To understand the characteristics of these tumors, further case accumulation and multicenter clinical studies are needed. (243words).

INSM1 is a useful neuroendocrine marker to differentiate pancreatic serous cystadenoma from pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors in cytology and surgical specimens.

INTRODUCTION: Differentiating pancreatic serous cystadenoma (SCA) from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WDNETs) based on histomorphology is critical yet challenging, particularly in small biopsy samples. Our study aimed to examine the expression profile of INSM1 in cytologic and surgical resection specimens from pancreatic SCA to evaluate its potential as a discriminative marker against pancreatic WDNET. METHODS: We characterized INSM1 immunohistochemistry in 34 patients with pancreatic SCA, comprising 23 surgical resections and 11 cytology specimens. As a control, we used 28 cytology specimens from pancreatic WDNET. Clinical information was retrieved through a review of electronic medical records. RESULTS: All 11 pancreatic SCA cytology specimens and 15 of 23 pancreatic SCA surgical resections exhibited absent INSM1 immunostaining. Each of the remaining eight surgical resection specimens demonstrated 1 % immunoreactivity. In contrast, 27 out of 28 (96 %) pancreatic WDNET cytology specimens were positive for INSM1 immunostaining, with a median immunoreactivity of 90 % and a range of 30-90 %. Overall, INSM1 immunostains perform similarly to chromogranin and synaptophysin in pancreatic SCA. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that INSM1 immunohistochemistry staining may serve as a useful neuroendocrine marker to differentiate pancreatic SCA from pancreatic WDNET in clinical practice. To our knowledge, this represents the first large-scale study to evaluate INSM1 immunostaining in surgical and cytology specimens from pancreatic SCA.

Mesenteric sparing approach for advanced nodal extent in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Is there a limit to the vascular resection in order to avoid creating a short small bowel syndrome? An anatomic research study.

PURPOSE: By selectively perfusing the first three jejunal arteries (JA), we aim to assess the individual perfusion length of small bowel (SB) and its impact on nodal resection in stage III-up small-intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NET). METHODS: Our anatomical research protocol implies a midline laparotomy and three measures of the SB length. We then perform a classical anterior approach of the superior mesenteric vessels. We carry on with the complete dissection and checking of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in order to identify the first three JA. Then we selectively perfuse each artery with colored latex solutions and measure the length of small bowel perfused respectively. RESULTS: We conducted our protocol on six cadaveric subjects. Mean(SD) SB length was 413(5.7), 535(13.2), 485(15), 353(25.1), 730(17.3) and 525(16° cm respectively from subject one to six. Most JA originated from the left side of the SMA. The first JA originated from its posterior wall in two subjects. Mean(SD) distance of origin of the first three JA was 4.6(1.3)cm, 6(1.1)cm and 7.1(0.9)cm respectively. Mean(SD) diameter of SMA was 10.8(3.3)mm. Mean diameter of the three first JA was 4(1.4)mm, 4(1.5)mm and 5(1.2)mm respectively. Mean(SD) SB length perfused by first and second JA was 224(14.9)cm, 175(8.6)cm, 238.3(7.6)cm, 84.3(5.1)cm, 233.3(5.8)cm and 218.3(10.4)cm respectively from subject one to six. CONCLUSION: We observed a trend suggesting that the first and second JA may sustain a SB length beyond the viable 1.5 m limit, implying the feasibility of stage III-up SI-NET resection with just two JA.

A comparative study of INSM1 (clone MRQ70) immunoreactivity on CytoLyt® pretreated cytology and resection specimens of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) is a newly characterized sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker for neuroendocrine (NE) tumors. Whereas more traditional NE markers, such as chromogranin A and synaptophysin, are cytoplasmic, INSM1 is uniquely nuclear and thus could serve as a useful addition to NE tumor workup. While application of immunohistochemical studies to cytology specimens is becoming increasingly relevant, knowledge of the effects of the certain fixatives as well as the pattern and intensity of immunoexpression are important considerations. METHODS: Sixteen cases of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET) diagnosed between 2015 and 2021 underwent both fine-needle aspiration, which was subsequently prepared in CytoLyt®-fixed cytology cell block (CCB), and surgical resection, in which specimens were prepared into formalin-fixed paraffin embedded blocks (FFPE). For all samples, INSM1 immunoreactivity was classified according to staining intensity and extent, then compared between CCBs and matched FFPEs. RESULTS: All 16 FFPE specimens demonstrated strong and diffuse INSM1 immunoreactivity, while only 10/16 (62.5%) CCBs were positive. Of those 10, only 2/10 (20%) demonstrated strong and diffuse reactivity. CONCLUSION: The choice of fixative has a demonstrable effect on the immunoreactivity of INSM1 in PanNET. Even though the sensitivity is lower in CytoLyt®-fixed cell block specimens, the addition of INSM1 is useful, especially in challenging cases that may be negative for one or more of the traditional NE markers.

Liver transplant for primary biliary tract neuroendocrine tumor in a nine-year-old girl.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare epithelial neoplasms that arise most commonly from the gastrointestinal tract. In pediatrics, the most common site of origin is in the appendix, with the liver being the most common site of metastasis. Neuroendocrine tumors arising from the biliary tract are extremely rare. METHODS: We describe a case of a nine-year-old girl who presented with obstructive cholestasis and was found to have multiple liver masses identified on biopsy as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor with an unknown primary tumor site. RESULT: The patient underwent extensive investigation to identify a primary tumor site, including endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and capsule endoscopy. The patient ultimately underwent definitive management with liver transplant, and on explant was discovered to have multiple well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, WHO Grade 1, with extensive infiltration into the submucosa of bile duct, consistent with primary biliary tract neuroendocrine tumor. CONCLUSION: Identifying the site of the primary tumor in NETs found within the liver can be challenging. To determine if an extrahepatic primary tumor exists, workup should include endoscopy, EUS, and capsule endoscopy. Children with well-differentiated hepatic NETs, with no identifiable primary tumor, and an unresectable tumor, are considered favorable candidates for liver transplantation.

Endoscopic treatments for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (cEMR), EMR with a transparent cap, EMR using a ligation device (EMR-L), EMR after circumferential precutting (EMR-P), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have been used for resecting rectal neuroendocrine tumors (r-NETs). However, there is no consensus regarding which is the best treatment. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the aforementioned 5 techniques for resecting r-NETs by network meta-analysis. METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science) were systematically searched to include relevant studies published from inception to September 1, 2023. The en bloc resection rate, histologic complete resection rate, positive lateral margin rate, positive vertical margin rate, adverse events rate, and procedure time were compared. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies with a total of 2112 r-NETs were included, and the mean diameter of tumors was 6.24 mm. Pairwise meta-analysis showed that EMR-L and ESD had higher en bloc resection and histologic complete resection rates and lower positive vertical margin rate than those of cEMR in resecting r-NETs. Compared with ESD, EMR-L and EMR-P achieved similar resection rates and significantly shortened the procedure time without increasing adverse events. The network meta-analysis evaluated the surface under the cumulative ranking curves and revealed that EMR-L was the best modality for treating r-NETs considering the comprehensive results of the en bloc resection rate, histologic complete resection rate, positive lateral margin rate, positive vertical margin rate, adverse events rate, and procedure time. CONCLUSION: EMR-L should be recommended as the first-line endoscopic treatment for small r-NETs.