Utility of Second-look Ultrasonography in Distinguishing BI-RADS 4 Calcifications Detected on Mammography: An observational study.

This study aimed to assess the utility of second-look ultrasonography (US) in differentiating breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 4 calcifications initially detected on mammography (MG). BI-RADS 4 calcifications have a wide range of positive predictive values. We hypothesized that second-look US would help distinguish BI-RADS 4 calcifications without clinical manifestations and other abnormalities on MG. This study included 1622 pure BI-RADS 4 calcifications in 1510 women (112 patients with bilateral calcifications). The cases were randomly divided into training (85%) and testing (15%) datasets. Two nomograms were developed to differentiate BI-RADS 4 calcifications in the training dataset: the MG-US nomogram, based on multifactorial logistic regression and incorporated clinical information, MG, and second-look US characteristics, and the MG nomogram, based on clinical information and mammographic characteristics. Calibration of the MG-US nomogram was performed using calibration curves. The discriminative ability and clinical utility of both nomograms were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the decision analysis curve (DCA) in the test dataset. The clinical information and imaging characteristics were comparable between the training and test datasets. The bias-corrected calibration curves of the MG-US nomogram closely approximate the ideal line for both datasets. In the test dataset, the MG-US nomogram exhibited a higher AUC than the MG nomogram (0.899 vs 0.852, P = .01). DCA demonstrated the superiority of the MG-US nomogram over the MG nomogram. Second-look US features, including ultrasonic calcifications, lesions, and moderate or marked color flow, were valuable for distinguishing BI-RADS 4 calcifications without clinical manifestations and other abnormalities on MG.

Characterizing Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients Using a Deep-Learning Model Compared With Radiologists' Analysis of Grayscale Ultrasound and Lymphosonography.

ABSTRACT: The objective of the study was to use a deep learning model to differentiate between benign and malignant sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast cancer compared to radiologists' assessments.Seventy-nine women with breast cancer were enrolled and underwent lymphosonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examination after subcutaneous injection of ultrasound contrast agent around their tumor to identify SLNs. Google AutoML was used to develop image classification model. Grayscale and CEUS images acquired during the ultrasound examination were uploaded with a data distribution of 80% for training/20% for testing. The performance metric used was area under precision/recall curve (AuPRC). In addition, 3 radiologists assessed SLNs as normal or abnormal based on a clinical established classification. Two-hundred seventeen SLNs were divided in 2 for model development; model 1 included all SLNs and model 2 had an equal number of benign and malignant SLNs. Validation results model 1 AuPRC 0.84 (grayscale)/0.91 (CEUS) and model 2 AuPRC 0.91 (grayscale)/0.87 (CEUS). The comparison between artificial intelligence (AI) and readers' showed statistical significant differences between all models and ultrasound modes; model 1 grayscale AI versus readers, P = 0.047, and model 1 CEUS AI versus readers, P < 0.001. Model 2 r grayscale AI versus readers, P = 0.032, and model 2 CEUS AI versus readers, P = 0.041.The interreader agreement overall result showed κ values of 0.20 for grayscale and 0.17 for CEUS.In conclusion, AutoML showed improved diagnostic performance in balance volume datasets. Radiologist performance was not influenced by the dataset's distribution.

Use of ultrasound imaging Omics in predicting molecular typing and assessing the risk of postoperative recurrence in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of a multiparametric ultrasound imaging omics model in predicting the risk of postoperative recurrence and molecular typing of breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 534 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer through preoperative ultrasonography and pathology, from January 2018 to June 2023 at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. Univariate analysis and multifactorial logistic regression modeling were used to identify independent risk factors associated with clinical characteristics. The PyRadiomics package was used to delineate the region of interest in selected ultrasound images and extract radiomic features. Subsequently, radiomic scores were established through Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and Support Vector Machine (SVM) methods. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Evaluation of diagnostic efficacy and clinical practicability was conducted through calibration curves and decision curves. RESULTS: In the training set, the AUC values for the postoperative recurrence risk prediction model were 0.9489, and for the validation set, they were 0.8491. Regarding the molecular typing prediction model, the AUC values in the training set and validation set were 0.93 and 0.92 for the HER-2 overexpression phenotype, 0.94 and 0.74 for the TNBC phenotype, 1.00 and 0.97 for the luminal A phenotype, and 1.00 and 0.89 for the luminal B phenotype, respectively. Based on a comprehensive analysis of calibration and decision curves, it was established that the model exhibits strong predictive performance and clinical practicability. CONCLUSION: The use of multiparametric ultrasound imaging omics proves to be of significant value in predicting both the risk of postoperative recurrence and molecular typing in breast cancer. This non-invasive approach offers crucial guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of the condition.

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and shear-wave elastography for small breast nodules.

Background: The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and shear-wave elastography (SWE) in detecting small malignant breast nodules in an effort to inform further refinements of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification system. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed patients with breast nodules who underwent conventional ultrasound, CEUS, and SWE at Gongli Hospital from November 2015 to December 2019. The inclusion criteria were nodules ≤ 2 cm in diameter with pathological outcomes determined by biopsy, no prior treatments, and solid or predominantly solid nodules. The exclusion criteria included pregnancy or lactation and low-quality images. Imaging features were detailed and classified per BI-RADS. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: The study included 302 patients with 305 breast nodules, 113 of which were malignant. The diagnostic accuracy was significantly improved by combining the BI-RADS classification with CEUS and SWE. The combined approach yielded a sensitivity of 88.5%, specificity of 87.0%, positive predictive value of 80.0%, negative predictive value of 92.8%, and accuracy of 87.5% with an area under the curve of 0.877. Notably, 55.8% of BI-RADS 4A nodules were downgraded to BI-RADS 3 and confirmed as benign after pathological examination, suggesting the potential to avoid unnecessary biopsies. Conclusion: The integrated use of the BI-RADS classification, CEUS, and SWE enhances the accuracy of differentiating benign and malignant small breast nodule, potentially reducing the need for unnecessary biopsies.

Value of sonoelastography for diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions and comparison with BI-RADS: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Not all the breast lesions were mass-like, some were non-mass-like at ultrasonography. In these lesions, conventional ultrasonography had a high sensitivity but a low specificity. Sonoelastography can evaluate tissue stiffness to differentiate malignant masses from benign ones. Then what about the non-mass lesions? The aim of this study was to evaluate the current accuracy of sonoelastography in the breast non-mass lesions and compare the results with those of the American College of Radiology breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). METHODS: An independent literature search of English medical databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase & MEDLINE (Embase.com) and Cochrane Library, was performed by 2 researchers. The accuracy of sonoelastography was calculated and compared with those of BI-RADS. RESULTS: Fourteen relevant studies including 1058 breast non-mass lesions were included. Sonoelastography showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.70-0.78), specificity of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 25.22 (95% CI: 17.71-35.92), and an area under the curve of 0.9042. Eight articles included both sonoelastography and BI-RADS. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC were 0.69 versus 0.91 (P < .01), 0.90 versus 0.68 (P < .01), 19.65 versus 29.34 (P > .05), and 0.8685 versus 0.9327 (P > .05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sonoelastography has a higher specificity and a lower sensitivity for differential diagnosis between malignant and benign breast non-mass lesions compared with BI-RADS, although there were no differences in AUC between them.

Spatial and geometric learning for classification of breast tumors from multi-center ultrasound images: a hybrid learning approach.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women, and ultrasound is a usual tool for early screening. Nowadays, deep learning technique is applied as an auxiliary tool to provide the predictive results for doctors to decide whether to make further examinations or treatments. This study aimed to develop a hybrid learning approach for breast ultrasound classification by extracting more potential features from local and multi-center ultrasound data. METHODS: We proposed a hybrid learning approach to classify the breast tumors into benign and malignant. Three multi-center datasets (BUSI, BUS, OASBUD) were used to pretrain a model by federated learning, then every dataset was fine-tuned at local. The proposed model consisted of a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a graph neural network (GNN), aiming to extract features from images at a spatial level and from graphs at a geometric level. The input images are small-sized and free from pixel-level labels, and the input graphs are generated automatically in an unsupervised manner, which saves the costs of labor and memory space. RESULTS: The classification AUCROC of our proposed method is 0.911, 0.871 and 0.767 for BUSI, BUS and OASBUD. The balanced accuracy is 87.6%, 85.2% and 61.4% respectively. The results show that our method outperforms conventional methods. CONCLUSIONS: Our hybrid approach can learn the inter-feature among multi-center data and the intra-feature of local data. It shows potential in aiding doctors for breast tumor classification in ultrasound at an early stage.

Comparison of Mammography and Mammography with Supplemental Whole-Breast US Tomography for Cancer Detection in Patients with Dense Breasts.

BACKGROUND: Women with dense breasts benefit from supplemental cancer screening with US, but US has low specificity. PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of breast US tomography (UST) combined with full-field digital mammography (FFDM) compared with FFDM alone for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multireader multicase study included women with dense breasts who underwent FFDM and UST at 10 centers between August 2017 and October 2019 as part of a prospective case collection registry. All patients in the registry with cancer were included; patients with benign biopsy or negative follow-up imaging findings were randomly selected for inclusion. Thirty-two Mammography Quality Standards Act-qualified radiologists independently evaluated FFDM followed immediately by FFDM plus UST for suspicious findings and assigned a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category. The superiority of FFDM plus UST versus FFDM alone for cancer detection (assessed with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]), BI-RADS 4 sensitivity, and BI-RADS 3 sensitivity and specificity were evaluated using the two-sided significance level of α = .05. Noninferiority of BI-RADS 4 specificity was evaluated at the one-sided significance level of α = .025 with a -10% margin. RESULTS: Among 140 women (mean age, 56 years ±10 [SD]; 36 with cancer, 104 without), FFDM plus UST achieved superior performance compared with FFDM alone (AUC, 0.60 [95% CI: 0.51, 0.69] vs 0.54 [95% CI: 0.45, 0.64]; P = .03). For FFDM plus UST versus FFDM alone, BI-RADS 4 mean sensitivity was superior (37% [428 of 1152] vs 30% [343 of 1152]; P = .03) and BI-RADS 4 mean specificity was noninferior (82% [2741 of 3328] vs 88% [2916 of 3328]; P = .004). For FFDM plus UST versus FFDM, no difference in BI-RADS 3 mean sensitivity was observed (40% [461 of 1152] vs 33% [385 of 1152]; P = .08), but BI-RADS 3 mean specificity was superior (75% [2491 of 3328] vs 69% [2299 of 3328]; P = .04). CONCLUSION: In women with dense breasts, FFDM plus UST improved cancer detection by radiologists versus FFDM alone. Clinical trial registration nos. NCT03257839 and NCT04260620 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Mann in this issue.

Ultrasound-based comparative analysis and nomogram development for predicting triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer: a 4-year institutional study in Quanzhou First Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare ultrasound features and establish a predictive nomogram for distinguishing between triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-TNBC. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: This study was conducted at Quanzhou First Hospital, a grade A tertiary hospital in Quanzhou, China, with the research data set covering the period from September 2019 to August 2023. PARTICIPANTS: The study included a total of 205 female patients with confirmed TNBC and 574 female patients with non-TNBC, who were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All patients underwent ultrasound examination and received a confirmatory pathological diagnosis. Nodules were classified according to the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System standard. Subsequently, the study conducted a comparative analysis of clinical characteristics and ultrasonic features. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was observed in multiple clinical and ultrasonic features between TNBC and non-TNBC. Specifically, in the logistic regression analysis conducted on the training set, indicators such as posterior echo, lesion size, presence of clinical symptoms, margin characteristics, internal blood flow signals, halo and microcalcification were found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). These significant indicators were then effectively incorporated into a static and dynamic nomogram model, demonstrating high predictive performance in distinguishing TNBC from non-TNBC. CONCLUSION: The results of our study demonstrated that ultrasound features can be valuable in distinguishing between TNBC and non-TNBC. The presence of posterior echo, size, clinical symptoms, margin, internal flow, halo and microcalcification was identified as predictive factors for this differentiation. Microcalcification, hyperechoic halo, internal flow and clinical symptoms emerged as the strongest predictive factors, indicating their potential as reliable indicators for identifying TNBC and non-TNBC.

A Nomogram Based on Conventional Ultrasound Radiomics for Differentiating Between Radial Scar and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast.

ABSTRACT: We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on conventional ultrasound (CUS) radiomics model to differentiate radial scar (RS) from invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast. In total, 208 patients with histopathologically diagnosed RS or IDC of the breast were enrolled. They were randomly divided in a 7:3 ratio into a training cohort (n = 145) and a validation cohort (n = 63). Overall, 1316 radiomics features were extracted from CUS images. Then a radiomics score was constructed by filtering unstable features and using the maximum relevance minimum redundancy algorithm and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression algorithm. Two models were developed using data from the training cohort: one using clinical and CUS characteristics (Clin + CUS model) and one using clinical information, CUS characteristics, and the radiomics score (radiomics model). The usefulness of nomogram was assessed based on their differentiating ability and clinical utility. Nine features from CUS images were used to build the radiomics score. The radiomics nomogram showed a favorable predictive value for differentiating RS from IDC, with areas under the curve of 0.953 and 0.922 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Decision curve analysis indicated that this model outperformed the Clin + CUS model and the radiomics score in terms of clinical usefulness. The results of this study may provide a novel method for noninvasively distinguish RS from IDC.

Statistical Methods for Comparing Predictive Values in Medical Diagnosis.

Evaluating the performance of a binary diagnostic test, including artificial intelligence classification algorithms, involves measuring sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Particularly when comparing the performance of two diagnostic tests applied on the same set of patients, these metrics are crucial for identifying the more accurate test. However, comparing predictive values presents statistical challenges because their denominators depend on the test outcomes, unlike the comparison of sensitivities and specificities. This paper reviews existing methods for comparing predictive values and proposes using the permutation test. The permutation test is an intuitive, non-parametric method suitable for datasets with small sample sizes. We demonstrate each method using a dataset from MRI and combined modality of mammography and ultrasound in diagnosing breast cancer.

A Prospective Multicenter Study on the Additive Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Biopsy Decision of Ultrasound BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions.

OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to determine whether the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) could improve the categorization of suspicious breast lesions based on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), thereby reducing the number of benign breast lesions referred for biopsy. METHODS: This prospective study, conducted between January 2017 and December 2018, enrolled consenting patients from eight teaching hospitals in China, who had been diagnosed with solid breast lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 using conventional ultrasound. CEUS was performed within 1 wk of diagnosis for reclassification of breast lesions. Histopathological results obtained from core needle biopsies or surgical excision samples served as the reference standard. The simulated biopsy rate and cancer-to-biopsy yield were used to compare the accuracy of CEUS and conventional ultrasound (US). RESULTS: Among the 1490 lesions diagnosed as BI-RADS 4 with conventional ultrasound, 486 malignant and 1004 benign lesions were confirmed based on histology. Following CEUS, 2, 395, and 211 lesions were reclassified as CEUS-based BI-RADS 2, 3, and 5, respectively, while 882 (59%) remained as BI-RADS 4. The actual cancer-to-biopsy yield based on US was 32.6%, which increased to 43.4% when CEUS-based BI-RADS 4A was used as the cut-off point to recommend biopsy. The simulated biopsy rate decreased to 73.4%. Overall, in this preselected BI-RADS 4 population, only 2.5% (12/486) of malignant lesions would have been miscategorized as BI-RADS 3 using CEUS-based reclassification. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound reclassification were 57.65%, 97.53%, and 38.35%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our collective findings indicate that CEUS is a valuable tool in further triage of BI-RADS category 4 lesions and facilitates a reduction in the number of biopsies while increasing the cancer-to-biopsy yield.

Evaluating breast ultrasonography as a complementary diagnostic method in girls with central precocious puberty.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of breast development by physical examination can be difficult in the early stages and in overweight girls. OBJECTIVE: To investigate ultrasonography (US) for evaluation of early breast development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 125 girls (age 7.1 ± 1.5 years) with breast development before 8 years underwent US breast staging, breast volume, and elastography, in addition to clinical/hormonal evaluation for precocious puberty. Accuracy of US for determining breast development and predicting progression to central precocious puberty was investigated. RESULTS: Physical examination revealed glandular breast enlargement in 100 and predominantly lipomastia in 25. Breast US in the former confirmed glandular breast development in 92 (group 1, physical examination and US positive), but not in 8 (group 2, physical examination positive, US negative). Comparison of the two groups demonstrated lower Tanner and US staging, bone age/chronological age, basal luteinizing hormone (LH), breast volume, and uterine volume in group 2. In the 25 lipomastia patients, US demonstrated no breast tissue in 19 (group 3, physical examination and US negative), but US stage ≥ II in 6 (group 4, physical examination negative, US positive) without differences in clinical parameters. After follow-up of 19.8 ± 4.2 months, 46/125 subjects were diagnosed with precocious puberty. US stage, total breast volume, and shear-wave speeds were significantly higher in these 46 patients. Multivariate analyses demonstrated breast volume > 3.4 cc had odds ratio of 11.0, sensitivity of 62%, and specificity of 89, in predicting progression to precocious puberty, being second only to stimulated LH for all variables. CONCLUSION: Breast US is a useful predictive tool for diagnosis of precocious puberty in girls. Higher US stages and higher breast volume on US increased the likelihood of eventual diagnosis of precocious puberty.

A Review of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging.

With the increasing dominance of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, the important prospects for their application have extended to various medical fields, including domains such as in vitro diagnosis, intelligent rehabilitation, medical imaging, and prognosis. Breast cancer is a common malignancy that critically affects women's physical and mental health. Early breast cancer screening-through mammography, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-can substantially improve the prognosis for breast cancer patients. AI applications have shown excellent performance in various image recognition tasks, and their use in breast cancer screening has been explored in numerous studies. This paper introduces relevant AI techniques and their applications in the field of medical imaging of the breast (mammography and ultrasound), specifically in terms of identifying, segmenting, and classifying lesions; assessing breast cancer risk; and improving image quality. Focusing on medical imaging for breast cancer, this paper also reviews related challenges and prospects for AI.

Improving ultrasound diagnostic Precision for breast cancer and adenosis with modality-specific enhancement (MSE) - Breast Net.

Adenosis is a benign breast condition whose lesions can mimic breast carcinoma and is evaluated for malignancy with the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). We construct and validate the performance of modality-specific enhancement (MSE)-Breast Net based on multimodal ultrasound images and compare it to the BI-RADS in differentiating adenosis from breast cancer. A total of 179 patients with breast carcinoma and 229 patients with adenosis were included in this retrospective, two-institution study, then divided into a training cohort (institution I, n = 292) and a validation cohort (institution II, n = 116). In the training cohort, the final model had a significantly greater AUC (0.82; P < 0.05) than B-mode-based model (0.69, 95% CI [0.49-0.90]). In the validation cohort, the AUC of the final model was 0.81, greater than that of the BI-RADS (0.75, P < 0.05). The multimodal model outperformed the individual and bimodal models, reaching a significantly greater AUC of 0.87 (95% CI = 0.69-1.0) (P < 0.05). MSE-Breast Net, based on multimodal ultrasound images, exhibited better diagnostic performance than the BI-RADS in differentiating adenosis from breast cancer and may contribute to clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Associated factors leading to misdiagnosis of a combined diagnostic model of different types of strain imaging and conventional ultrasound in evaluation of breast lesions: Selection strategy for using different types of strain imaging in evaluation of breast lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a decision tree that integrates conventional ultrasound (CUS) with two different strain imaging (SI) techniques for diagnosing breast lesions, and to analyze the factors contributing to false negative (FN) and false positive (FP) in the decision tree's outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Imaging and clinical data of 796 cases in the training set and 351 cases in the validation set were prospectively collected. A decision tree model that combines two types of SI and CUS was constructed, and its diagnostic performance was analyzed. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were applied to identify independent risk factors associated with FP and FN results of the decision tree model. RESULTS: Size, shape, margin, vascularity, the types of internal calcifications, EI score and VTI pattern were found to be significantly independently associated with the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. Therefore, size, shape, margin, vascularity, EI score and VTI pattern were used to construct decision tree models. The Tree (EI+VTI) model had the highest AUC. Both in the training and validation groups, the AUC of Tree (EI+VTI) was significantly higher compared with that of EI, VTI, and BI-RADS (all, P < 0.05). Orientation, posterior acoustic features and the types of internal calcifications were significantly positively associated with misdiagnosis results of Tree (EI+VTI) in evaluation of breast lesions (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic model based on a decision tree that integrates two distinct types of SI with CUS enhances the diagnostic accuracy of each method when used individually. This integration lowers the misdiagnosis rate, potentially assisting radiologists in more effective lesion assessments. When applying the decision tree model, attention should be paid to the orientation, posterior acoustic features, and the types of internal calcifications of the lesions.

MFMSNet: A Multi-frequency and Multi-scale Interactive CNN-Transformer Hybrid Network for breast ultrasound image segmentation.

Breast tumor segmentation in ultrasound images is fundamental for quantitative analysis and plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Recently, existing methods have mainly focused on spatial domain implementations, with less attention to the frequency domain. In this paper, we propose a Multi-frequency and Multi-scale Interactive CNN-Transformer Hybrid Network (MFMSNet). Specifically, we utilize Octave convolutions instead of conventional convolutions to effectively separate high-frequency and low-frequency components while reducing computational complexity. Introducing the Multi-frequency Transformer block (MF-Trans) enables efficient interaction between high-frequency and low-frequency information, thereby capturing long-range dependencies. Additionally, we incorporate Multi-scale interactive fusion module (MSIF) to merge high-frequency feature maps of different sizes, enhancing the emphasis on tumor edges by integrating local contextual information. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our MFMSNet over seven state-of-the-art methods on two publicly available breast ultrasound datasets and one thyroid ultrasound dataset. In the evaluation of MFMSNet, tests were conducted on the BUSI, BUI, and DDTI datasets, comprising 130 images (BUSI), 47 images (BUI), and 128 images (DDTI) in the respective test sets. Employing a five-fold cross-validation approach, the obtained dice coefficients are as follows: 83.42 % (BUSI), 90.79 % (BUI), and 79.96 % (DDTI). The code is available at https://github.com/wrc990616/MFMSNet.

A case of primary breast angiosarcoma diagnosed by multimodal ultrasound imaging with literature review.

Primary Breast Angiosarcoma (PBA) is an exceptionally rare form of breast cancer, accounting for less than 0.05% of all breast cancers. It is characterized by a high level of malignancy, invasiveness, and has a prognosis that is typically poor. The lack of distinctive clinical features makes it prone to underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis. This study retrospectively examines a case utilizing multimodal ultrasound imaging techniques (including 2D ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and ultrasound elastography) for diagnosing PBA. Furthermore, the study reviews relevant literature to summarize the ultrasound characteristics of PBA, with the aim of improving understanding of this elusive condition.

Breast cancer screening in BRCA1/2 pathogenic sequence variant carriers during pregnancy and lactation.

OBJECTIVES: Women harboring germline BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic sequence variants (PSVs) are at an increased risk for breast cancer. There are no established guidelines for screening during pregnancy and lactation in BRCA carriers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of whole-breast ultrasound (US) screening in pregnant and lactating BRCA PSV carriers. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from medical records of BRCA PSV carriers between 2014 and 2020, with follow-up until 2021. Associations between imaging intervals, number of examinations performed and pregnancy-associated breast cancers (PABCs) were examined. PABCs and cancers diagnosed at follow-up were evaluated and characteristics were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Overall 212 BRCA PSV carriers were included. Mean age was 33.6 years (SD 3.93, range 25-43 years). During 274 screening periods at pregnancy and lactation, eight (2.9 %) PABCs were diagnosed. An additional eight cancers were diagnosed at follow-up. Three out of eight (37.5 %) PABCs were diagnosed by US, whereas clinical breast examination (n = 3), mammography (n = 1) and MRI (n = 1) accounted for the other PACB diagnoses. One PABC was missed by US. The interval from negative imaging to cancer diagnosis was significantly shorter for PABCs compared with cancers diagnosed at follow-up (3.96 ± 2.14 vs. 11.2 ± 4.46 months, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, pregnant BRCA PSV carriers should not delay screening despite challenges like altered breast tissue and hesitancy towards mammography. If no alternatives exist, whole-breast ultrasound can be used. For lactating and postpartum women, a regular screening routine alternating between mammography and MRI is recommended.