Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
J Med Ethics ; 44(7): 471-475, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29880659

RESUMEN

Law's processes are likely always to be needed when particularly intractable conflicts arise in relation to the care of a critically ill child like Charlie Gard. Recourse to law has its merits, but it also imposes costs, and the courts' decisions about the best interests of such children appear to suffer from uncertainty, unpredictability and insufficiency. The insufficiency arises from the courts' apparent reluctance to enter into the ethical dimensions of such cases. Presuming that such reflection is warranted, this article explores alternatives to the courts, and in particular the merits of specialist ethics support services, which appear to be on the rise in the UK. Such specialist services show promise, as they are less formal and adversarial than the courts and they appear capable of offering expert ethical advice. However, further research is needed into such services - and into generalist ethics support services - in order to gauge whether this is indeed a promising development.


Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Enfermedad Crítica , Toma de Decisiones/ética , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Inutilidad Médica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Privación de Tratamiento/legislación & jurisprudencia , Comités Consultivos/ética , Ética Médica , Humanos , Lactante , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/ética , Jurisprudencia , Inutilidad Médica/ética , Reino Unido , Privación de Tratamiento/ética
2.
Arch Pediatr ; 24(3): 265-272, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28131555

RESUMEN

Pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), whose accessibility to parents raises controversy, often operate under their own rules. Patients are under critical and unstable conditions, often in a life-threatening situation. In this context, the communication with the parents and their participation in the unit may be difficult. Information is a legal, deontological, and moral duty for caregivers, confirmed by the parents' needs. But the ability to enforce them is a challenge, and there is a gap between the theory and the reality. The communication between the parents and the physicians starts at the admission of the child with a family conference. According to the Société de réanimation de langue française (SRLF), the effectiveness of the communication is based on three criteria: the patients' comprehension, their satisfaction and their anxiety and depression. It has been shown that comprehension depends on multiple factors, related on the parents, the physicians, and the medical condition of the child. Regarding the parents' participation in the organization of the service, the parents' presence is becoming an important factor. In the PICU, the parents' status has evolved. They become a member of the care team, as a partner. The best interest of the child is always discussed with the parents, as the person knowing the best their child. This partnership gives them a responsibility, which is complementary to the physician's one, but does not substitute it.


Asunto(s)
Acceso a la Información/legislación & jurisprudencia , Comunicación , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Padres/educación , Padres/psicología , Relaciones Profesional-Familia , Adaptación Psicológica , Ansiedad/psicología , Niño , Comprensión , Enfermería de la Familia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Francia , Alfabetización en Salud , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Colaboración Intersectorial , Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Admisión del Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pronóstico , Resucitación/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol ; 219(3): 118-24, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26039500

RESUMEN

Careful analysis of current adjudication reveals increasing demand of adequate record-keeping as well as meticulously documented informed consent forms regarding all aspects of medicine. Although standardized informed consent forms or explicit guidelines for obtaining procedural consent already exist in surgical disciplines there is strong evidence that, however, in neonatology (and paediatric intensive care) these processes are still incomplete and qualitatively insufficiently implemented. Therefore the author discussed all existing information prescriptions with the legal department and quality management of a large German clinic group especially in terms of relevant legislation, recent case law and specialist literature in order to obtain potential for improvement. Based on the results of this audit of expert opinions improved recommendations could be implemented in the daily practise of a department of neonatology and paediatric intensive care on a tertiary level.


Asunto(s)
Documentación/normas , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Neonatología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Neonatología/normas , Consentimiento Paterno/legislación & jurisprudencia , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Alemania , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/normas
4.
PLoS One ; 9(6): e99888, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24923320

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In light of the Korean Supreme Court's 2009 ruling favoring a patient's right to die with dignity, we evaluated trends in aggressive care in a cohort of pediatric cancer patients. Methods We conducted a population-based retrospective study that used administrative data for patients who died in 2007-2010 among the 5,203 pediatric cancer patients registered at the Korean Cancer Central Registry (KCCR) during 2007-2009. RESULTS: In the time period covered, 696 patients died. The proportion who had received chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life decreased from 58.1% to 28.9% (P<0.001), those who received new chemotherapy in the same time period decreased from 55.2% to 15.1% (P<0.001), and those who received treatment in the last 2 weeks of life decreased from 51.4% to 21.7% (P<0.001). In the last 30 days of life, the proportion of patients whose hospital admission period was over 14 days increased from 70.5% to 82.5% (P = 0.03), the proportion who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation decreased from 28.6% to 9.6% (P<0.001), and we found no statistically significant trends in the proportion of emergency department visits, intensive care unit admissions, or mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, in contrast with earlier ones, the aggressiveness of end-of-life care of Korean pediatric cancer patients decreased dramatically.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/tendencias , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/terapia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/tendencias , Cuidado Terminal/tendencias , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/normas , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Sistema de Registros , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Derecho a Morir , Cuidado Terminal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cuidado Terminal/normas , Cuidado Terminal/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Arch Pediatr ; 21(1): 34-43, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24315107

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To identify the knowledge of caregivers of pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) on the French law related to patients' rights and end of life, their views on withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (WWLST) decisions, and their feelings about how these decisions were made and implemented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter survey in 24 French PICUs during the fourth trimester 2010. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred and thirty-nine professional healthcare workers (1005 paramedics and 334 physicians) responded. Over 85% of caregivers had good knowledge of the WWLST decision-making processes required by law. More than 80% of caregivers accepted mechanical ventilation, hemodiafiltration, or hemodynamic support withdrawal or withholding. Nevertheless, the withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration generated reluctance or opposition for the majority of respondents. While paramedics' participation in the decision-making process was deemed necessary by all caregivers, paramedics found more often than physicians that they were insufficiently involved. The quality of end-of-life care was judged very positively by caregivers. The answers on how WWLST was applied suggest very different interpretations of the law. Some caregivers respect the principles of palliative care as stated in the public health code and 40% of doctors and 64% of caregivers consider it "acceptable" to hasten death if resulting from a collaborative decision-making process. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to show that caregivers of French PICUs have good knowledge of the French law concerning the end of life. Yet, there is still confusion about the limits of practice during the end-of-life period.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Derechos del Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Órdenes de Resucitación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cuidado Terminal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Privación de Tratamiento/legislación & jurisprudencia , Niño , Principio del Doble Efecto , Francia , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Suicidio Asistido/legislación & jurisprudencia
6.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 31(12): 937-44, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23182182

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Leonetti Law of 2005 concerns procedures for questioning about the appropriateness of initiating or maintaining life-sustaining treatments. Decision of withdrawing and withholding treatment has long been practiced by neonatologists, adult and pediatricians intensivists. In this regard, the recommendations of societies encourage medical teams to assess their practices to improve them. Our evaluation is based on the document of the Ethics Committee of SRLF edited in 2010. TYPE OF STUDY: We achieved a retrospective evaluation of professional practices of the transcription of our decisions of withdrawing and withholding treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included all children (95 patients) who have had a questioning about life-sustaining treatment of ICU between March 2008 and August 2011 in the pediatric intensive care unit of Children's Hospital of Lyon. Our evaluation is based on the document of the Ethics Committee of French Society of intensive care (SRLF) edited in 2010. We collected epidemiological data on children concerned by questioning about the appropriateness of initiating or maintaining LST and an evaluation of the transcription of our procedures for LST in our folders. Evaluation included 40 cases: 20 folders randomly selected prior an information meeting (January 2011) which were compared with 20 cases occurred consecutively after this information. This meeting was intended to remind recommendations of good practice and principal points of the law. The main assessment measure was the improvement of the practices respecting criteria of the document of the Ethics Committee of SRLF modified for pediatric care. MAIN RESULTS: Epidemiological data on procedures are comparable to literature data. Concerning the evaluation of our practices before/after a briefing and highlighted a tendency to the improvement without statistically significance. The transcription of reflection and the arguments of decision of withdrawing and withholding treatment and evaluation of pain was the points who need improvement. Finally, despite the positive developments in the therapeutic use of analgesics and sedatives, pain continues to be undervalued. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of professional practices is recommended to improve the procedures of questioning about life-sustaining treatments have become an area of expertise in intensive care.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Privación de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Medicamentos , Comités de Ética Clínica , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Lactante , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/ética , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tiempo de Internación , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Padres , Órdenes de Resucitación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Privación de Tratamiento/ética , Privación de Tratamiento/legislación & jurisprudencia
9.
Br J Nurs ; 14(9): 519-23, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15924004

RESUMEN

This article reports on the issues relating to obtaining informed, signed consent for a study of paediatric high-dependency care and provides practical guidance on confidentiality for health service researchers. Consent and confidentiality are not new concepts but recent changes to the legislation and guidance offered from nursing and medical regulatory bodies have caused concerns and confusion for researchers with respect to both issues. Balancing health service research and the development of services against the requirements of patients for confidentiality is essential yet challenging. This was a time consuming, costly exercise. Resource implications may ultimately mean that studies which are of benefit to patients in relation to the delivery of their care may not be undertaken. Health professionals need to be continually updated and made aware of the legislation and confidentiality requirements for health service research involving the collection of patient-identifiable details.


Asunto(s)
Acceso a la Información/legislación & jurisprudencia , Confidencialidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Investigación en Enfermería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Derechos del Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Niño , Defensa del Niño/legislación & jurisprudencia , Seguridad Computacional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Recolección de Datos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Comités de Ética en Investigación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sistemas de Identificación de Pacientes/legislación & jurisprudencia , Consentimiento Presumido/legislación & jurisprudencia , Reino Unido
10.
Crit Care Med ; 31(5 Suppl): S407-10, 2003 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12771592

RESUMEN

Informed consent constitutes one of the important considerations included in the myriad ethical dilemmas in the pediatric intensive care unit. Traditionally, the law has viewed children as incompetent to make medical decisions, and society has authorized parents or guardians to act on behalf of children. Empirical evidence has revealed that children may be more capable of participating in their medical decisions than previously thought. Some scholars now think that parents have the right to give informed permission and that professionals should seek the child's assent in many circumstances. Physicians in the intensive care unit should seriously consider consulting adolescent patients about the direction of their care and may wish to seek the input of younger patients in appropriate circumstances.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Consentimiento Informado/ética , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/ética , Consentimiento Paterno , Niño , Ética Clínica , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/legislación & jurisprudencia , Menores/legislación & jurisprudencia , Autonomía Personal , Rol del Médico , Estados Unidos
11.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 11(5): 597-601, 2001.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11696125

RESUMEN

This is the third of a series of three articles examining the recent changes in the law in relation to ethics and the practice of paediatric anaesthesia. The review covers, in a practical question and answer format, the topics of consent, research, intensive care issues and organ donation in children.


Asunto(s)
Ética Clínica , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Consentimiento por Terceros , Donantes de Tejidos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Privación de Tratamiento , Anestesiología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Muerte Encefálica/diagnóstico , Niño , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/legislación & jurisprudencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...