Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Assessing the Impact of Residency Training on Early Surgical Experience.

BACKGROUND: Transferring the intricate laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) technique poses a considerable challenge for novice surgeons. Fellowship programs, typically lasting three to twelve months, remain the primary avenue for acquiring laparoscopic skills. This study proposes that residency-based laparoscopy training confers distinct advantages over fellowship programs during the initial stages of LRP. METHODS: The study analyzed retrospectively collected data and operation videos from the first and second sets of fifty operations (Group 1 and Group 2) out of a total of 553 performed by the "fellow" surgeon between August 2009 and December 2022, and the first fifty operations by the "resident" surgeon from January 2022 to June 2023. Parameters examined included patient demographics, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, grades, stages, operation durations, complications, postoperative outcomes, and short-term (6-month) oncological and functional results. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in prostate volume, age, body mass index, or PSA levels between Groups 2 and 3 or 1 and 3 (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, Group 3 exhibited significantly more International Society of Urological Pathology grade 3 and 4 cases than Group 1 (p = 0.004) and Group 2 (p = 0.006). Additionally, Group 3 had a shorter anastomosis time (AT) (25 min vs. 35 min, p < 0.001) and reduced estimated blood loss (EBL) (275 mL vs. 385 mL, p = 0.008) compared to Group 1. No significant differences were found among the groups regarding intraoperative complications, nerve sparing, or lymph node dissection rates. While Group 2's anastomosis time was comparable to that of Group 3 (24 min vs. 25 min, p = 0.144), it demonstrated a significantly shorter insufflation duration (150 min vs. 170 min, p < 0.001). Functional outcomes, including continence and erectile function at six months, showed no significant differences across the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the potential benefits of integrating LRP training into a surgeon's residency, particularly in the early stages of their learning curve (LC), by reducing anastomosis and operation times and EBL in the first fifty cases. Initial findings suggest that implementing modular training in residency programs could enhance LRP proficiency, benefiting both surgeons and patients.

Establishing postgraduate education in urology for nurses and the non-medical workforce using a partnership model.

Eleri Phillips, Urology Education Programme Lead, Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Prescot, Merseyside (eleri.phillips@sthk.nhs.uk) was the Gold Award winner in the Urology Nurse of the Year category of the BJN Awards 2024.

Case Volume Is Not Associated With Outcomes After Adrenalectomy Performed by Urologic Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Our goal was to compare outcomes of adrenalectomy performed by low-volume and high-volume academic urologists with extensive experience in renal surgery. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review identified patients undergoing adrenalectomy by urologists from 2009 to 2023. Data were gathered on demographics, tumor characteristics, surgeon volume, surgical outcomes including length of procedure, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and complications identified by the Clavien-Dindo complication classification system. Bivariable and multivariable analyses adjusting for BMI, size of mass, age, and surgical approach compared outcomes between low- and high-volume adrenalectomy surgeons. RESULTS: A total of 304 adrenalectomies were performed by 7 urologic surgeons during the study period. One surgeon was high volume, with an average of 15 adrenalectomies per year during the study period. The remaining 6 surgeons ranged from < 1 to 4 adrenalectomies per year on average during the study period and were considered low volume. On multivariable analysis, the rate of any complication was found to be significantly different between the groups (5.3% vs 13.5%, P = .01). However, on analysis of Clavien 3 or higher complications, the rate was not found to be different (1% vs 4%, P = .22). Procedure time (130 vs 134 minutes, P = .33), estimated blood loss (30 vs 50 mL, P = .86), positive margin rate (11% vs 7%, P = .35), and length of stay (2 days vs 2 days, P = .22) were not different when the surgery was performed by a high-volume or low-volume urologist. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical volume may not affect outcomes of adrenalectomy when performed by urologists experienced in retroperitoneal surgery at a high-volume, specialized center.

Implementation and Utility of the Da Vinci SP (Single Port) in Pediatric Urology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Detail the evolution, utility, and future directions of the da Vinci SP® in pediatric urology, focusing on perioperative outcomes and intraoperative details. RECENT FINDINGS: The SP has been safely and successfully utilized in various pediatric urological procedures, from pyeloplasty to nephroureterectomy to appendicovesicostomy. Reports indicate mixed operative times but similar hospital stays and postoperative outcomes compared to multiport (MP) robotic surgery. The learning curve for transitioning from MP to SP systems in pediatric patients appears manageable, though the smaller abdominal circumference in children poses a notable challenge. This review assumes that SP systems will primarily be acquired for adult services, not considering initial and ongoing costs to hospital systems. The SP serves as a complementary option, rather than a replacement, for MP robotic surgery in pediatric urology, offering potential advantages in specific scenarios. Cosmetic outcomes with the SP appear at least as favorable as MP surgery, but further research is needed. Future research should focus on patient-centered outcomes to optimize SP robotic surgery use in pediatric patients.

Trends of European School of Urology (ESU) training and resident education: an overview of 2 decades of EAU education programme.

BACKGROUND: Over the last 2 decades, various education and training programmes have been launched by the European School of Urology (ESU) on behalf of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Education Office. These include e-learning platforms, in-person meetings, courses, podcasts, webinars, sub-specialisation meetings and the European Urology Resident Education Programme (EUREP), all of which aim to achieve standardisation in urological education (SISE) and training at the highest level. METHODS: Data from the last 2 decades of all ESU activities were collected by the EAU/ESU office and analyzed for attendance, geographical, gender and age trends. Demographic data on registrations and attendances at EUREP were also monitored and analysed. A descriptive analysis of participation and trends is provided. RESULTS: A total of 4750 participants have completed ESU courses (including guideline courses, specialization courses and webinar courses). Similarly, a total of 5958 trainees attended the EUREP from 2004 to 2022 of which the male: female ratio was 3.75:1. However, the proportion of females increased 3.5-fold from 10.7% in 2004 to 37.1% in 2022(p < 0.001). There is a growing interest in the meeting, with increasing registrations over this time (353 in 2004 to 599 in 2023, p < 0.001). The mean age of participants is constantly decreasing (32.6 years in 2004 to 31.54 in 2022), with a mean yearly decrease of -0.18% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ESU courses have had increasing interest and participation from young urologists worldwide. During EUREP, while the trainee age has decreased, there has been a surge in the proportion of female trainees. ESU is providing all modes of education and training across the world with both virtual and in-person meetings and courses, which would help in the development and preparation of urologists of the future and provide the best patient care.

Monkeypox: a new threat for healthcare and urology?

Monkeypox is an emerging zoonotic viral disease caused by the Monkeypox virus, traditionally confined to central and west Africa, which has recently spread to other regions worldwide, making it a global health concern...

The impact of single-port robotic surgery: a survey among urology residents and fellows in the United States.

Our aim was to investigate the perception and future expectations of Single-Port (SP) surgery among urology trainees in the United States. A 34-item online survey was distributed to urological residency and fellowship programs across the US, covering demographic profiles, SP training opportunities, perceived educational impact, and future perspectives. Descriptive analysis and multivariable linear regression were used to assess predictors of SP adoption. 201 surveys were completed (28.6% completion rate). Among institutions with an SP platform, about 50% have used it regularly for over 2 years, though often in less than 50% of procedures. While robotic simulators are commonly available, only 17% offer both multi-port and SP simulators, and structured pre-clinical SP training is limited. Approximately 30% of respondents expressed concerns over limited hands-on experience and a steeper learning curve with SP. Around 40% felt that their robotic surgery exposure was negatively impacted by SP's introduction. SP surgery's benefits are seen mostly in the immediate post-operative period and a significant number of respondents foresee a major role for SP in urology. However, proficiency in SP surgery is not seen as crucial for career advancement or job opportunities. Academic job aspirations, SP platform availability, and SP surgery workload are predictors of future SP implementation. Trainees increasingly recognize the clinical benefits of SP procedures but express concerns about the potential negative impact on hands-on experience. Training programs should more systematically integrate SP technology into curricula. There is a correlation between training in high-volume SP centers and future SP adoption.

Artificial intelligence improves urologic oncology patient education and counseling.

INTRODUCTION: Patients seek support from online resources when facing a troubling urologic cancer diagnosis. Physician-written resources exceed the recommended 6-8th grade reading level, creating confusion and driving patients towards unregulated online materials like AI chatbots. We aim to compare the readability and quality of patient education on ChatGPT against Epic and Urology Care Foundation (UCF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed prostate, bladder, and kidney cancer content from ChatGPT, Epic, and UCF. We further studied readability-adjusted responses using specific AI prompting (ChatGPT-a) and Epic material designated as Easy to Read. Blinded reviewers completed descriptive textual analysis, readability analysis via six validated formulas, and quality analysis via DISCERN, PEMAT, and Likert tools. RESULTS: Epic met the recommended grade level, while UCF and ChatGPT exceeded it (5.81 vs. 8.44 vs. 12.16, p < 0.001). ChatGPT text was longer with more complex wording (p < 0.001). Quality was fair for Epic, good for UCF, and excellent for ChatGPT (49.5 vs. 61.67 vs. 64.33). Actionability was overall poor but particularly lowest (37%) for Epic. On qualitative analysis, Epic lagged on all quality measures. When adjusted for user education level (ChatGPT-a and Epic Easy to Read), readability improved (7.50 and 3.53), but only ChatGPT-a retained high quality. CONCLUSIONS: Online urologic oncology patient materials largely exceed the average American's literacy level and often lack real-world utility for patients. Our ChatGPT-a model indicates that AI technology can improve accessibility and usefulness. With development, a healthcare-specific AI program may help providers create content that is accessible and personalized to improve shared decision-making for urology patients.

Battle of the bots: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT and bing AI for kidney stone-related questions.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the performance of ChatGPT™ (Open AI®) and Bing AI™ (Microsoft®) for responding to kidney stone treatment-related questions in accordance with the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines and assess factors such as appropriateness, emphasis on consulting healthcare providers, references, and adherence to guidelines by each chatbot. METHODS: We developed 20 kidney stone evaluation and treatment-related questions based on the AUA Surgical Management of Stones guideline. Questions were asked to ChatGPT and Bing AI chatbots. We compared their responses utilizing the brief DISCERN tool as well as response appropriateness. RESULTS: ChatGPT significantly outperformed Bing AI for questions 1-3, which evaluate clarity, achievement, and relevance of responses (12.77 ± 1.71 vs. 10.17 ± 3.27; p < 0.01). In contrast, Bing AI always incorporated references, whereas ChatGPT never did. Consequently, the results for questions 4-6, which evaluated the quality of sources, were consistently favored Bing AI over ChatGPT (10.8 vs. 4.28; p < 0.01). Notably, neither chatbot offered guidance against guidelines for pre-operative testing. However, recommendations against guidelines were notable for specific scenarios: 30.5% for the treatment of adults with ureteral stones, 52.5% for adults with renal stones, and 20.5% for all patient treatment. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT significantly outperformed Bing AI in terms of providing responses with clear aim, achieving such aim, and relevant and appropriate responses based on AUA surgical stone management guidelines. However, Bing AI provides references, allowing information quality assessment. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate these chatbots and their potential use by clinicians and patients for urologic healthcare-related questions.

A bench-top evaluation of the Ily® robotics assisted tele console system in ureteroscopy by medical students, residents and urologists: does prior videogaming experience help shape the learning curve?

PURPOSE: Previous studies have demonstrated an association between video-gaming experience (VGE) and improved robotics skills. We aimed to evaluate the initial learning curve for the Ily® robotics system (Sterlab, Sophia Antipolis, France) when applied to flexible ureteroscopy (FU) among both medical students and urology surgeons. METHODS: There were two groups, surgeons and students. An initial questionnaire was completed detailing basic demographics and experience. In part one, both groups performed two simple timed tasks using an Ily® mounted single-use RAU. In part two, group 1 repeated both tasks using a hand-held FU. A subjective assessment of comfort, intuitiveness and a NASA Task Load Index were then completed. RESULTS: There was a total of 28 participants. Among medical students with VGE (n = 9, 64%)., average calyceal inspection time was 185 ± 80 s; 133 ± 42 s; 121 ± 71 s. For non-gamers (n = 5, 36%), average times were longer at 221 ± 97 s; 134 ± 35 s; 143 ± 68 s respectively. Average calyceal inspection time for videogaming surgeons (n = 8, 57%) was 126 ± 95 s; 98 ± 40 s; 107 ± 71 s, respectively. For non-gamers average inspection times were longer at 150 ± 73 s; 114 ± 82 s; 111 ± 47 s, respectively. None of these differences achieved statistical significance. Surgeons trial speeds were, however, significantly faster by hand-held compared to RAU: by 103, 81 and 82 s respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results show that ex- or current- video gamers do not have a significant advantage in time to perform FU. Any early advantage conferred to ex- or current- gamers may be rapidly overcome.

Prostate cancer diagnostic pathway in men with lower urinary tract symptoms or performing opportunistic screening: The Italian Society of Urology (SIU) position paper.

BACKGROUND: Voluntary PCa screening frequently results in excessive use of unnecessary diagnostic tests and an increasing risk of detection of indolent PCa and unaffordable costs for the various national health systems. In this scenario, the Italian Society of Urology (Società Italiana di Urologia, SIU) proposes an organized flow chart guiding physicians to improve early diagnosis of significant PCa avoiding unnecessary diagnostic tests and prostate biopsy. METHODS: According to available evidence and international guidelines [i.e., European Association of Urology (EAU), American Association of Urology (AUA) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)] on PCa, a Panel of expert urologists selected by Italian Society of Urology (SIU, Società Italiana di Urologia) proposed some indications to develop a stepwise diagnostic pathway based on the diagnostic tests mainly used in the clinical practice. The final document was submitted to six expert urologists for external revision and approval. Moreover, the final document was shared with patient advocacy groups. RESULTS: In voluntary men and symptomatic patients with elevated PSA value (>3 ng/mL), the Panel strongly discourage the use of antibiotic agents in absence of urinary tract infection confirmed by urine culture. DRE remains a key part of the urologic physical examination helping urologists to correctly interpret PSA elevation and prioritizing the execution of multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) in presence of suspicious PCa. Men with negative mpMRI and low clinical suspicion of PSA (PSA density < 0.20 ng/mL/cc, negative DRE findings, no family history) can be further monitored. Men with negative mpMRI and a higher risk of PCa (familial history, suspicious DRE, PSAD>0.20 ng/mL/cc or PSA>20 ng/mL) should be considered for systematic prostate biopsy. While PI-RADS 4-5 lesions represent a strong indication for prostate biopsy, PI-RADS 3 lesions should be further stratified according to PSAD values and prostate biopsy performed when PSAD is higher than 0.20. Accreditation, certification, and quality audits of radiologists and centers performing prostatic mpMRI should be strongly considered. The accessibility and/or the waiting list for MRI examinations should be also evaluated in the diagnostic pathway. The panel suggests performing transperineal or transrectal targeted plus systematic biopsies as standard of care. CONCLUSIONS: Scientific societies must support the use of shared diagnostic pathway with the aim to increase the early detection of significant PCa reducing a delayed diagnosis of advanced PCa. Moreover, a shared diagnostic pathway can reduce the incorrect use of antibiotic, the number of unnecessary laboratory and radiologic examinations as well as of prostate biopsies.

High Levels of Incidental COVID-19 Infection in Emergency Urology Admissions: A Propensity Score-Matched Real World Data Analysis across Surgical Specialties.

Background: An incidental COVID-19 infection is often found in patients admitted for non-COVID-19-related conditions. This study aims to investigate the incidence of COVID-19 infections across surgical specialties including urology, general surgery, and orthopaedic surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study based on a territory-wide electronic database in Hong Kong. All emergency in-hospital admissions under the urology, general surgery, and orthopaedic surgery divisions in the public healthcare system in Hong Kong from January to September 2022 were included. All patients were routinely screened for SARS-CoV-2, based on admission protocols during the investigation period. Baseline characteristics were retrieved, with 1:1:1 propensity score matching being performed. Incidental COVID-19 rates were then compared across specialties. Results: A total of 126,034 patients were included. After propensity score matching, the baseline characteristics were well balanced, and 8535 patients in each group were analysed. Urology admission was noted to have a statistically significant higher incidence of incidental COVID-19 at 9.3%, compared to general surgery (5.4%) or orthopaedic surgery (5.6%). Amongst urology patients with incidental COVID-19 infection, 35.8% were admitted for retention of urine, 27.9% for haematuria, and 8.6% for a urinary tract infection. Conclusions: This large-scale cohort study demonstrated that incidental COVID-19 rates differ between surgical specialties, with urology having the highest proportion of incidental COVID-19 infection.

Conscientious Objection to Gender-Affirming Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Plastic Surgery and Urology Residency Programs.

OBJECTIVE: Medical conscientious objection is a federally protected right of physicians to refuse participation in medically indicated services or research activities that are incompatible with their ethical, moral, or religious beliefs. Individual provider objections to gender-affirming surgery have been documented, however the prevalence of such objections is unknown. Our study aimed to characterize physician objections to gender-affirming surgery in plastic surgery and urology residencies and to assess related institutional policies. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional electronic survey was administered to program leadership of 239 accredited US plastic surgery and urology residencies from February to October 2023. Trainee exposure to gender-affirming surgery, programmatic experience with objections, and presence and content of institutional objection policies were collected. Bivariate analyses were performed to determine associations with objectors. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-four plastic surgery (n = 59) and urology (n = 65) residencies completed the survey, representing a 52% response rate. Most programs included didactic training (n = 107, 86%) and direct clinical exposure (n = 98, 79%) to gender-affirming surgery. Few (n = 24, 19%) endorsed existent objection policies. Sixteen programs (13%) experienced objections to gender-affirming surgery by trainees (n = 15), faculty (n = 6), and staff (n = 1). Neither geographic region, exposure to gender-affirming surgery, nor presence of objection policies significantly contributed to programmatic objections. Programs with formal objection policies reported increased confidence in addressing future objection events (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Objection to gender-affirming surgery is a rare, but plausible occurrence amongst plastic surgery and urology trainees. Residency programs should consider anticipatory policies to protect patients and, when feasible, provide reasonable accommodations for objecting trainees.

The Film Room: Using Artificial Intelligence to Facilitate Video Review for Urology Trainees.

Video-based educational programs offer a promising avenue to augment surgical preparation, allow for targeted feedback delivery, and facilitate surgical coaching. Recently, developments in surgical intelligence and computer vision have allowed for automated video annotation and organization, drastically decreasing the manual workload required to implement video-based educational programs. In this article, we outline the development of a novel AI-assisted video forum and describe the early use in surgical education at our institution.