Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation in a Patient with a Transvenous Dual-chamber Pacemaker: Considerations for Diagnosis and Management.

Cardiac implantable electronic device leads can contribute to tricuspid regurgitation and also complicate surgical and transcatheter interventions to manage tricuspid regurgitation. Here we present a case of a patient with sinus node dysfunction and complete heart block who underwent extraction of a right ventricular pacing lead before tricuspid valve surgery. We review the data regarding the contribution of leads to tricuspid regurgitation and the benefits of lead extraction, risks of jailing leads during tricuspid interventions, and pacing considerations around tricuspid valve procedures.

Transthoracic echocardiographic Doppler metrics in evaluating bioprosthetic tricuspid valve dysfunction.

PURPOSE: There is currently limited information on the utility of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)-derived Doppler parameters for assessing bioprosthetic tricuspid valve (BTV) dysfunction. Our study aimed to establish the precision and appropriate reference ranges for routinely collected transthoracic Doppler parameters in the assessment of BTV dysfunction. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 100 BTV patients who underwent TTE. Based on redo surgical confirmation or more than 2 repeat TTE or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examinations, patients were allocated to normal (n = 61), regurgitant (n = 24), or stenotic (n = 15) BTV group. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression were performed to identify TTE Doppler parameters that detected BTV dysfunction. RESULTS: The VTI ratio (VTITV/VTILVOT) was the most accurate Doppler parameter for detecting BTV dysfunction, with a ratio of >2.8 showing 84.6% sensitivity and 90.2% specificity. VTI ratio > 3.2, mean gradient (MGTV) > 6.2 mmHg and pressure half-time > 218 ms detected significant BTV stenosis, with sensitivities of 100%, 93.3% and 93.3% and specificities of 82.4%, 75.3% and 87.1%, respectively. After multivariate analysis, the VTI ratio > 2.8 (OR = 9.00, 95% CI = 2.13-41.61, p = .003) and MGTV > 5.1 mmHg (OR = 6.50, 95% CI = 1.69-27.78, p = .008) were the independent associations of BTV dysfunction. With these cutoff values, 75.0%-92.2% of normal and 62.5%-96.0% of dysfunctional BTV were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler parameters from TTE can accurately identify BTV dysfunction, particularly with VTI ratio > 2.8 and MGTV > 5.1 mmHg, to assess the need for additional testing with TEE.

Relationship of TAPSE Normalized by Right Ventricular Area With Pulmonary Compliance, Exercise Capacity, and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: While tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) captures the predominant longitudinal motion of the right ventricle (RV), it does not account for ventricular morphology and radial motion changes in various forms of pulmonary hypertension. This study aims to account for both longitudinal and radial motions by dividing TAPSE by RV area and to assess its clinical significance. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 71 subjects with New York Heart Association class II to III dyspnea who underwent echocardiogram and invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (which defined 4 hemodynamic groups: control, isolated postcapillary pulmonary hypertension, combined postcapillary pulmonary hypertension, and pulmonary arterial hypertension). On the echocardiogram, TAPSE was divided by RV area in diastole (TAPSE/RVA-D) and systole (TAPSE/RVA-S). Analyses included correlations (Pearson and linear regression), receiver operating characteristic, and survival curves. RESULTS: On linear regression analysis, TAPSE/RVA metrics (versus TAPSE) had a stronger correlation with pulmonary artery compliance (r=0.48-0.54 versus 0.38) and peak VO2 percentage predicted (0.23-0.30 versus 0.18). Based on the receiver operating characteristic analysis, pulmonary artery compliance ≥3 mL/mm Hg was identified by TAPSE/RVA-D with an under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (optimal cutoff ≥1.1) and by TAPSE/RVA-S with an AUC of 0.83 (optimal cutoff ≥1.5), but by TAPSE with only an AUC of 0.67. Similarly, to identify peak VO2 <50% predicted, AUC of 0.66 for TAPSE/RVA-D and AUC of 0.65 for TAPSE/RVA-S. Death or cardiovascular hospitalization at 12 months was associated with TAPSE/RVA-D ≥1.1 (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.11-0.56]) and TAPSE/RVA-S ≥1.5 (HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.16-0.78]), while TAPSE was not associated with adverse outcomes (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.53-1.94]). Among 31 subjects with available cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, RV ejection fraction was better correlated with novel metrics (TAPSE/RVA-D r=0.378 and TAPSE/RVA-S r=0.328) than TAPSE (r=0.082). CONCLUSIONS: In a broad cohort with suspected pulmonary hypertension, TAPSE divided by RV area was superior to TAPSE alone in correlations with pulmonary compliance and exercise capacity. As a prognostic marker of right heart function, TAPSE/RVA-D <1.1 and TAPSE/RVA-S <1.5 predicted adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Causes and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Who Failed Screening for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions.

Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) has recently emerged as a promising alternative to surgery for tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, a significant proportion of patients fail screening for TTVI, and little is known about their characteristics and natural history. This study sought to investigate causes of screen failure and outcomes of patients declined for TTVI. This was a retrospective single-center study of 32 patients who were ineligible for participation in transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement and tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair trials. Patients were classified into 2 groups according to the therapy they received: optimized medical therapy (OMT) group or intervention group. The mean age was 82 ± 7.8 years and 68.8% were women. The most common reasons for TTVI exclusion were anatomic/procedural impediment (53.1%), inclusion criteria not met (40.6%), and multivalvular disease (6.3%). Overall, 19 patients (59.4%) did not undergo subsequent tricuspid intervention. The clinical outcomes of these patients who received OMT alone were poor, with a 1-year composite of cardiac death or heart failure readmission of 47.4%. These rates were worse than in patients who subsequently underwent an intervention, albeit not statistically significant (OMT: 47.7% vs 23.1% interventions, p = 0.3), and were significantly more pronounced in the subgroup of patients who were excluded for anatomic/procedural limitations (OMT: 70% vs 14.3% interventions, p = 0.05). In conclusion, patients ineligible for TTVI, particularly, those with anatomic/procedural limitations, and treated medically have poor outcomes. These data underscore the importance of earlier referral and support the need for further transcatheter therapy iterations.

Contemporary Valvular Mechanisms of Aortic Regurgitation in Tricuspid Aortic Valves: Importance in Repair Versus Replacement Strategy.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine cusp causes of aortic regurgitation in patients with tricuspid aortic valves without significant aortic dilatation and define cusp pathologies amenable to surgical repair (aortic valve repair [AVr]) versus aortic valve replacement. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed surgical reports of consecutive adults with tricuspid aortic valves undergoing surgery for clinically significant aortic regurgitation within a prospective registry from January 2005 to September 2019. Valvular mechanisms were determined by systematic in vivo intraoperative quantification methods. Of 516 patients, 287 (56%) underwent repair (AVr; mean±SD age, 59.9±12.4 years; 81% men) and 229 (44%) underwent replacement (aortic valve replacement; mean±SD age, 62.8±13.8 years [P=0.01 compared to AVr]; 67% men). A single valvular mechanism was present in 454 patients (88%), with cusp prolapse (46%), retraction (24%), and perforation (18%) being the most common. Prolapse involved the right cusp in 86% of cases and was more frequent in men (P<0.001). Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography accuracy for predicting mechanisms was 73% to 82% for the right cusp, 55% to 61% for the noncoronary cusp, and 0% for the left-coronary cusp. Cusp prolapse, younger age, and larger patient size were associated with successful AVr (all P<0.03), whereas retraction, perforation, older age, and concomitant mitral repair were associated with aortic valve replacement (all P<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Right cusp prolapse is the most frequent single valvular mechanism in patients with tricuspid aortic valve aortic regurgitation, followed by cusp retraction and perforation. The accuracy of 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography is limited for left and noncoronary cusp mechanistic assessment. Prolapse is associated with successful AVr, whereas retraction and perforation are associated with aortic valve replacement. With systematic intraoperative quantification methods and current surgical techniques, more than half of tricuspid aortic valve aortic regurgitation cases may be successfully repaired.

New Approaches to Assessment and Management of Tricuspid Regurgitation Before Intervention.

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a progressive condition associated with substantial morbidity, poor quality of life, and increased mortality. Patients with TR commonly have coexisting conditions including congestive heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, chronic lung disease, atrial fibrillation, and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices, which can increase the complexity of medical and surgical TR management. As such, the optimal timing of referral for isolated tricuspid valve (TV) intervention is undefined, and TV surgery has been associated with elevated risk of morbidity and mortality. More recently, an unprecedented growth in TR treatment options, namely the development of a wide range of transcatheter TV interventions (TTVI) is stimulating increased interest and referral for TV intervention across the entire medical community. However, there are no stepwise algorithms for the optimal management of symptomatic severe TR before TTVI. This article reviews the contemporary assessment and management of TR with addition of a medical framework to optimize TR before referral for TTVI.

Mid-term outcomes of right ventricular papillary muscle approximation for severe functional tricuspid regurgitation.

OBJECTIVES: Recurrence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after tricuspid annuloplasty can occur in cases where a dilated right ventricle exists and subsequent leaflet tethering follows. We previously reported a new technique of the right ventricular papillary muscle approximation (RV-PMA) for functional TR associated with leaflet tethering. The objective of this study is to elucidate the mid-term outcomes and evaluate the durability of RV-PMA. METHODS: Between January 2014 and March 2023, we applied RV-PMA in 20 patients of advanced functional TR with severe leaflet tethering. The indication of the technique was severe TR with leaflet tethering height >8 mm, and/or a right ventricular end-diastolic diameter >45 mm. The patients were followed up with echocardiography before discharge and at annual interval thereafter. RESULTS: There was no perioperative mortality. In the echocardiography performed before discharge, TR was decreased to mild or less in 85%, and a significant improvement in right ventricular end-diastolic diameter and tethering height were achieved (53-45 mm and 11.1-4.4 mm, respectively). Furthermore, during the median 3-year follow-up period, TR was kept controlled mild or less in 80% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: RV-PMA is considered to be a safe, effective and durable technique as an additional approach for tricuspid annuloplasty.

Validation of TRI-SCORE for Outcome Prediction After Isolated Tricuspid Valve Surgery in Asian Patients.

BACKGROUND: TRI-SCORE was recently developed in Europe as a risk model for predicting in-hospital death after isolated tricuspid valve surgery. We aimed to validate TRI-SCORE in an Asian population and investigate its value for predicting long-term outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The TRI-SCORE was calculated for 202 patients (65±11 years, 61% women, 81% functional tricuspid regurgitation) who underwent isolated tricuspid valve surgery for severe tricuspid regurgitation at 2 Korean centers and was based on 8 parameters: age, New York Heart Association class, right-sided heart failure signs, furosemide daily dose, glomerular filtration rate, bilirubin, left ventricular ejection fraction, and moderate/severe right ventricular dysfunction. The primary outcome was all-cause death during follow-up; the secondary outcome was in-hospital death. During a median follow-up duration of 50 (interquartile range, 21-82) months after isolated tricuspid valve surgery, 23 (11.4%) patients experienced the primary outcome, and 7 (3.5%) patients experienced the secondary outcome. Observed all-cause death and in-hospital death increased by up to 50% in those with higher scores. Patients with the primary outcome had a higher TRI-SCORE (4.5±2.4 versus 2.9±2.1; P=0.001) than those without. The TRI-SCORE showed a significant association with the primary outcome (concordance index, 0.77, cutoff value, 4) and in-hospital death (area under the curve, 0.84; cutoff value, 3). Using the Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with a high TRI-SCORE exhibited a poor outcome for all-cause death at follow-up (log-rank P<0.001) and in-hospital death (log-rank P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: TRI-SCORE was validated in an Asian population and helped predict long-term outcomes after isolated tricuspid valve surgery.

Prediction of Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization After Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions: Validation of TRISCORE.

BACKGROUND: Data on the prognostic role of the TRI-SCORE in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) are limited. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the TRI-SCORE in predicting outcomes of patients undergoing TTVI. METHODS: TriValve (Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies) is a large multicenter multinational registry including patients undergoing TTVI. The TRI-SCORE is a risk model recently proposed to predict in-hospital mortality after tricuspid valve surgery. The TriValve population was stratified based on the TRI-SCORE tertiles. The outcomes of interest were all-cause death and all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization. Procedural complications and changes in NYHA functional class were also reported. RESULTS: Among the 634 patients included, 223 patients (35.2%) had a TRI-SCORE between 0 and 5, 221 (34.8%) had 6 or 7, and 190 (30%) had ≥8 points. Postprocedural blood transfusion, acute kidney injury, new atrial fibrillation, and in-hospital mortality were more frequent in the highest TRI-SCORE tertile. Postprocedure length of stay increased with a TRI-SCORE increase. A TRI-SCORE ≥8 was associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality and all-cause mortality and the composite endpoint assessed at a median follow-up of 186 days (OR: 3.00; 95% CI: 1.38-6.55; HR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.78-4.13; HR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.57-2.74, respectively) even after adjustment for procedural success and EuroSCORE II or Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality. The NYHA functional class improved across all TRI-SCORE values. CONCLUSIONS: In the TriValve registry, the TRI-SCORE has a suboptimal performance in predicting clinical outcomes. However, a TRISCORE ≥8 is associated with an increased risk of clinical events and a lack of prognostic benefit after successful TTVI.

Revisiting echocardiographic features of prosthetic heart valves: the necessity of correct differentiation of mono-leaflet vs. bileaflet mechanical heart valves in a case report.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical heart valve replacement is a standard treatment for severe valvular disorders. The use of mono-leaflet valves has decreased recently. Recognizing the echocardiographic features of mono-leaflet and bileaflet valves is crucial for accurate complication diagnosis and proper management. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old female with mono-leaflet mitral and bileaflet tricuspid valves underwent an echocardiographic assessment. This simple educational case provides a unique opportunity to compare the echocardiographic features of these valves within a single patient. CONCLUSION: There is a crucial need for clinicians, particularly those in training, to differentiate between mono-leaflet and bileaflet mechanical heart valves adeptly. With mono-leaflet valves decreasing in prevalence, proficiency in recognizing the echocardiographic nuances of each type is imperative. Failure to do so may result in misdiagnoses and inappropriate management. This underscores the significance of continuous education and vigilance in echocardiographic assessments to ensure optimal patient care.