[Polio vaccines and biorisk management of polioviruses].

Japan is the first country where inactivated polio vaccines derived from Sabin attenuated strains, which are used to manufacture oral polio vaccines, were introduced in routine immunization program. The Sabin-derived inactivated vaccine has been developed based on the fact that Sabin strains are less neurovirulent and manufactured at safer productionfacilities than wild polioviruses. It is also convincing that Sabin strains are more safely used for evaluating the efficacy of inactivated vaccines in rat immunogenicity tests. However, in the current situation where polioviruses are close to being eradicated, the facilities that manufacture vaccines and/or conduct quality control of them are needed to meet the biorisk management requirements established by WHO, which are based on the Polio Eradication & Endgame Strategic Plan 2013-2018. At present, type 2 polioviruses including Sabin 2 strain should be contained in the facilities which meet the WHO biorisk management requirements. The respective facilities are expected to give full consideration based on a careful risk assessment of viral transmission not only to personnel, but also to the environment and the community around the facilities, and the establishment of biorisk management will be needed. Thus, the facilities handling and storing infectious polioviruses must be certified as poliovirus-essential facilities following the WHO biorisk management requirements.

Lot-to-lot Consistency, Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of an Investigational Hexavalent Vaccine in US Infants.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter phase III study (NCT01340937) evaluated the consistency of immune responses to 3 separate lots of diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-acellular pertussis 5, inactivated poliovirus vaccine, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and hepatitis B (DTaP5-IPV-Hib-HepB), an investigational hexavalent vaccine (HV). METHODS: Healthy infants were randomized (2:2:2:1) to receive HV or Pentacel (Control). Groups 1, 2 and 3 received HV at 2, 4 and 6 months, and Control at 15 months. Group 4 received Control at 2, 4, 6 and 15 months, plus Recombivax HB (HepB) at 2 and 6 months. Concomitant Prevnar 13 was given to all groups at 2, 4, 6 and 15 months; pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (RV5) was given to all groups at 2, 4 and 6 months. Blood specimens (3-5 mL) were collected immediately before administration of dose 1, postdose 3, immediately before toddler dose, and after toddler dose. Adverse events were recorded after each vaccination. RESULTS: The 3 manufacturing lots of HV induced consistent antibody responses to all antigens. Immunogenicity of HV was noninferior to Control for all antibodies, except for pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin geometric mean concentration postdose 3, and pertussis pertactin (PRN) geometric mean concentration after toddler dose. Postdose 3 immunogenicity of concomitantly administered Prevnar 13 was generally similar (except for serotype 6B) when given with HV or Control. Adverse events of HV were similar to Control, except for a higher rate of fever ≥38.0°C [49.2% vs. 35.4%, estimated difference 13.7% (8.4, 18.8)]. CONCLUSIONS: HV demonstrated lot-to-lot manufacturing consistency; safety and immunogenicity were comparable with the licensed vaccines. HV provides a new combination vaccine option within the US 2-month, 4-month and 6-month vaccine series.

European Pharmacopoeia biological reference preparation for poliomyelitis vaccine (inactivated): collaborative study for the establishment of batch No. 3.

Inactivated poliomyelitis vaccines are an important part of the World Health Organization (WHO) control strategy to eradicate poliomyelitis. Requirements for the quality control of poliomyelitis vaccines (inactivated) include the use of an in vitro D antigen quantification assay for potency determination on the final lot as outlined in the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) monograph 0214. Performance of this assay requires a reference preparation calibrated in International Units (IU). A Ph. Eur. biological reference preparation (BRP) for poliomyelitis vaccine (inactivated) calibrated in IU has been established for this purpose. Due to the dwindling stocks of batch 2 of the BRP a collaborative study was run as part of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) Biological Standardisation Programme to establish BRP batch 3 (BRP3). Twelve laboratories including Official Medicines Control Laboratories (OMCLs) and manufacturers participated. The candidate BRP3 (cBRP3) was from the same source and had the same characteristics as BRP batch 2 (BRP2). During the study the candidate was calibrated against the 3rd International Standard for inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine using in-house D antigen ELISA assays in line with the Ph. Eur. monograph 0214. The candidate was also compared to BRP2 to evaluate the continuity. Based on the results of the study, values of 320 DU/mL, 78 DU/mL and 288 DU/mL (D antigen units/mL) (IU) for poliovirus type 1, 2 and 3 respectively were assigned to the candidate. In June 2016, the Ph. Eur. Commission adopted the material as Ph. Eur. BRP for poliomyelitis vaccine (inactivated) batch 3.

sIPV process development for costs reduction.

Polio is expected to be eradicated within only a few years from now. Upon polio eradication, the use of oral polio vaccines, which can cause circulating and virulent vaccine derived polio viruses, will be stopped. From this moment onwards, inactivated polio vaccines (IPV) will be used for worldwide vaccination against polio. An increased demand for IPV is thus anticipated. As a result, process development studies regarding the IPV production process, developed in the 1960s, have intensified. Studies on yield optimization aiming at costs reduction as well as the use of alternative polio viruses, which are more biosafe for manufacturing, are actual. Here our strategy to setup a new IPV production process using attenuated Sabin polio virus strains is presented. Moreover, aspects on reduction of the costs of goods and the impact of process optimization on sIPV costs are reviewed.

A national reference for inactivated polio vaccine derived from Sabin strains in Japan.

As one aspect of its campaign to eradicate poliomyelitis, the World Health Organization (WHO) has encouraged development of the inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) derived from the Sabin strains (sIPV) as an option for an affordable polio vaccine, especially in low-income countries. The Japan Poliomyelitis Research Institute (JPRI) inactivated three serotypes of the Sabin strains and made sIPV preparations, including serotypes 1, 2 and 3 D-antigens in the ratio of 3:100:100. The National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan, assessed the immunogenic stability of these sIPV preparations in a rat potency test, according to an evaluation method recommended by the WHO. The immunogenicity of the three serotypes was maintained for at least 4 years when properly stored under -70°C. Based on these data, the sIPV preparations made by JPRI have been approved as national reference vaccines by the Japanese national control authority and used for the quality control of the tetracomponent sIPV-containing diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis combination vaccines that were licensed for a routine polio immunization in Japan.

Regulation and standardization of IPV and IPV combination vaccines.

Inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) is not only increasingly used on a global basis but also is a component of many combination vaccines. Standardization and control of IPV continues to be a challenge for manufacturers and regulators. A rat immunogenicity assay is currently recommended by many authorities, including WHO, as the definitive in vivo potency. Alternative in vitro assays to determine D-antigen content have been developed and are routinely used in some countries to assess IPV potency assay. However, the other less reliable in vivo immunogenicity assays are also used (e.g. monkey, chick). We review some of the regulatory challenges facing current and future IPV assessment, with a focus on the relevance of in vivo and in vitro tests, considerations for Sabin derived IPV and discussion of future efforts for standardization.

Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) combination vaccines and evaluation of pertussis immune responses.

Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) combination vaccines based on inactivated whole-cell Bordetella pertussis (DTPw) or purified acellular pertussis components (DTPa) facilitate vaccine administration and will allow further co-administration such as with pneumococcal conjugates. Safety and immunogenicity studies are needed to demonstrate non-inferiority between combinations and the separate vaccines. The immunological non-inferiority is based on threshold antibody levels that represent correlates of protection. However, in case of pertussis, correlates of protection have not been defined or accepted. We describe the clinical evaluation of DTPa- and DTPw-based combinations and demonstrate their immunological non-inferiority as compared to their separately administered licensed counterparts. With respect to antibody responses against pertussis, a number of evaluations (vaccine response rates and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for anti-PT, anti-FHA, anti-PRN or anti-BPT; reverse cumulative distribution curves) are described. We also demonstrate that the B. pertussis mouse lung clearance model is able to predict clinical efficacy of licensed DTPa and DTPw vaccines and represents a useful tool to evaluate new combination vaccines.

Establishment of European Pharmacopoeia BRP batch 2 for inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine for in vitro D antigen assay.

A collaborative study was initiated by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (EDQM) to assign a potency value for the candidate Ph Eur BRP batch 2 against the 2nd International Standard (IS) in order to replace the dwindling stocks of Ph Eur BRP batch 1. The candidate material is a concentrated trivalent bulk (Type 1 (Mahoney), Type 2 (MEF1) and Type 3 (SAUKETT)) from a commercially available IPV vaccine. Nine laboratories participated in the collaborative study. Eight laboratories reported results. Participants performed in-house ELISA assays on the candidate BRP, the 2nd International Standard (IS) and the current BRP (BRP batch 1). An additional sample was included to acquire information on the correlation between the in vitro and in vivo assays based on comparison with a previous study. Results of that comparison are included as an annex. Potency estimates were satisfactory in terms of repeatability and reproducibility, however the estimates for the 2nd IS were significantly lower than those for Ph Eur BRP batch 1. These two reference standards are derived from the same material and were originally assigned the same potency value after a joint study run by EDQM and the WHO in 1994. A reconciliation study was therefore designed to determine if the IS stored at NIBSC and the IS which had been sent from NIBSC to EDQM for use in the initial study were equivalent. 3 of the laboratories from the initial study participated. Results revealed no significant difference between the 2nd IS stocks stored in the two different locations at NIBSC nor between BRP batch 1 and the standards stored at NIBSC for types 1 and 2. For type 3 the 2nd IS standards stored at NIBSC are 13 % less potent than the Ph Eur BRP batch 1. The 2nd IS which had been shipped from NIBSC to EDQM was significantly less potent than BRP batch 1 and the 2nd ISs stored at NIBSC for all three types, confirming the observation of the initial study. Possible explanations for this apparent loss of potency of the 2nd IS used in the study are under investigation. Since Ph Eur BRP batch 1 and the 2nd IS in stock at NIBSC appear no more different than when their original potency assignment was made at their establishment, and since the 2nd IS standard used in the initial part of this study was compromised, a consensus potency value for the candidate BRP was determined using Ph Eur BRP batch 1 as the reference standard. The candidate material was therefore assigned a potency of 320-67-282 D Antigen units/ml (IU) for types 1, 2 and 3 respectively. A stability monitoring program will be initiated. The candidate material was adopted by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission at its session in March 2003 as European Pharmacopoeia IPV vaccine BRP batch 2 for D Ag in vitro assay.

Analysis of an in vivo assay for inactivated polio vaccine.

Approaches to the statistical analysis of data from the rat bioassay for Inactivated Polio Vaccine are discussed and compared, using data from a recent collaborative study The measured response, an antibody titre obtained from a doubling dilution series, did not satisfy the requirements of normality and homogeneity of variance necessary for the standard parallel line model for quantitative data. Laboratory-specific cut-offs can be defined, to reduce the data to "positive" or "negative" responses, allowing valid analysis with the probit method.

WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization.

This report presents the recommendations of a WHO Expert Committee commissioned to coordinate activities leading to the adoption of international recommendations for the production and quality control of vaccines and other biologicals and the establishment of international biological reference materials. The report starts with a discussion of general issues brought to the attention of the Committee and provides information on issues relevant to international guidelines, recommendations and other matters related to the manufacture and quality control of biologicals. This is followed by information on the status and development of reference materials for bovine spongiform encephalopathy, various antigens, blood products, cytokines, growth factors and endocrinological substances. The second part of the report, of particular interest to manufacturers and national control authorities, contains sets of recommendations for the production and control of poliomyelitis vaccine (oral) and poliomyelitis vaccine (inactivated) and guidelines for the production and control of live attenuated Japanese encephalitis vaccine. Also included are lists of recommendations and guidelines for biological substances used in medicine, and other relevant documents.

CBER: new approaches to biological product testing.

Biological products are complex molecules and their testing presents unique technical challenges. Furthermore, there are certain expectations for the validation of methods applied for regulatory purposes. A few recent CBER policy initiatives which have an impact on the use of animal tests for biological products will be discussed, followed by an exposé of the MAPREC test for polio virus neurovirulence as an example of alternative test development and the validation process. Finally, some general comments about the validation process will be made.

[Performance of vaccinations against poliomyelitis in the province of Kraków versus the plan of elimination and eradication of this disease in Poland]. / Wykonawstwo szczepien przeciw poliomylitis na terenie województwa krakowskiego w odniesieniu do zalozen krajowego programu eliminacji i eradykacji poliomyelitis.

The criteria of elimination and eradication of poliomyelitis set down by the WHO and the performance of vaccinations are presented in the Province of Cracow and are compared with the plan of the National Programme of Elimination and Eradication of Poliomyelitis. The analysed period covered the years 1991-1998. In 1998 the World Health Congress passed the resolution on the elimination and eradication of poliomyelitis worldwide. For accepting eradication achieved the criterion is required of vaccination of 90-95% of babies aged under 2 years in the whole country, and not less than 90% in individual provinces. In early 1990's below 75% babies in that age group were vaccinated in the Province of Cracow. Only in 1998 for the first time the 92% rate of vaccinations as required by the WHO was achieved.

A new WHO International Reference Reagent for use in potency assays of inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine.

Assays of the potency of inactivated poliovirus vaccine require the use of an appropriate reference reagent. Preparation 91/574 was shown by international collaborative study to be suitable for determination of antigenic content and immunogenicity of inactivated poliovirus vaccines by in vitro and in vivo assays, respectively. The reagent is a trivalent blend of formaldehyde-inactivated monovalent pools of poliovirus type 1 (Mahoney) poliovirus type 2 (MEF-1) and poliovirus type 3 (Saukett). Studies by antigen-capture ELISA showed that the component monovalent pools contained high titres of D antigen and trace amounts of C antigen. Sucrose gradient analysis showed that the D antigenicity was almost exclusively associated with 150S virus particles. Low levels of procapsids (75S particles with D antigenicity) were detected in the type 1 and 2 monovalent pools. The profile of intact virions and procapsids in 91/574 in sucrose gradients was very similar to PU78-02, a previously used inactivated trivalent poliovirus vaccine reference. The World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee on Biological Standardization at its 1994 meeting established preparation 91/574 as the 2nd WHO international Reference Reagent for poliomyelitis vaccine (inactivated). A potency of 430, 95, 285 D antigen units per ml was assigned to poliovirus type 1, 2 and 3, respectively. A separate aliquot of this preparation, established by the European Pharmacopeia Commission as a Biological Reference Preparation, has an identical assigned titre. The 2nd WHO International Reference Reagent 91/574 is intended for calibration of secondary reference reagents.

Inactivated poliovirus vaccine: past and present experience.

Many countries have made use of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in their national poliovirus control programs since 1955. Until 1961 IPV was the only vaccine available for the control of poliovirus, but subsequently many countries opted to use the Sabin attenuated poliovirus vaccine (OPV), which was perceived as more effective in preventing intestinal infection and in ensuring community protection by spreading to unvaccinated contacts of vaccinees. Nevertheless, IPV has remained the vaccine of choice in several countries, where experience has shown that it represents a safe and effective option for disease control. IPV limits subsequent infection of the pharynx and intestine in vaccinees, and is able to control circulation of poliovirus in a vaccinated population, providing effective community protection. Furthermore IPV contains only killed virus and cannot cause vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis as OPV sometimes does. This paper reviews the history of the use of IPV, with emphasis on its efficacy and its ability to safely protect communities in which it is used. As the incidence of poliomyelitis declines new control strategies should take account of the knowledge of the use of poliovirus vaccines acquired since 1955.