Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.638
Filtrar
1.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2361946, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38845409

RESUMEN

Introduction COVID-19 vaccines may be administered with other vaccines during the same healthcare visit. COVID-19 monovalent (Fall 2021) and bivalent (Fall 2022) vaccine recommendations coincided with annual seasonal influenza vaccination. Data describing the frequency of the co-administration of COVID-19 vaccines with other vaccines are limited. Methods We used V-safe, a voluntary smartphone-based U.S. safety surveillance system established by the CDC, to describe trends in the administration of COVID-19 vaccines with other vaccines reported to V-safe during December 14, 2020 - May 19, 2023. Results Of the 21 million COVID-19 vaccinations reported to V-safe, 2.2% (459,817) were administered with at least 1 other vaccine. Co-administration most frequently occurred during the first week of October 2023 (27,092; 44.1%). Most reports of co-administration included influenza vaccine (393,003; 85.5%). Co-administration was most frequently reported for registrants aged 6 months-6 years (4,872; 4.4%). Conclusion Reports of co-administration to V-safe peaked during October 2023, when influenza vaccination most often occurs, possibly reflecting increased opportunities for multiple vaccinations and greater acceptability of the co-administration of COVID-19 vaccine with other vaccines, especially influenza vaccine.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Estados Unidos , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Niño , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Lactante , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Vacunación/métodos , Vacunación/tendencias , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología
2.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1371258, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38784590

RESUMEN

Introduction: Routine immunization programs have focused on increasing vaccination coverage, which is equally important for decreasing vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs), particularly in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). We estimated the trends and projections of age-appropriate vaccination coverage at the regional and national levels, as well as place of residence and wealth index in LMICs. Methods: In total, 174 nationally representative household surveys from 2000 to 2020 from 41 LMICs were included in this study. Bayesian hierarchical regression models were used to estimate trends and projections of age-appropriate vaccination. Results: The trend in coverage of age-appropriate Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), third dose of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTP3), third dose of polio (polio3), and measles-containing vaccine (MCV) increased rapidly from 2000 to 2020 in LMICs. Findings indicate substantial increases at the regional and national levels, and by area of residence and socioeconomic status between 2000 and 2030. The largest rise was observed in East Africa, followed by South and Southeast Asia. However, out of the 41 countries, only 10 countries are estimated to achieve 90% coverage of the BCG vaccine by 2030, five of DTP3, three of polio3, and none of MCV. Additionally, by 2030, wider pro-urban and -rich inequalities are expected in several African countries. Conclusion: Significant progress in age-appropriate vaccination coverage has been made in LMICs from 2000 to 2020. Despite this, projections show many countries will not meet the 2030 coverage goals, with persistent urban-rural and socioeconomic disparities. Therefore, LMICs must prioritize underperforming areas and reduce inequalities through stronger health systems and increased community engagement to ensure high coverage and equitable vaccine access.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Programas de Inmunización , Cobertura de Vacunación , Humanos , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura de Vacunación/tendencias , Países en Desarrollo/estadística & datos numéricos , Asia , África del Sur del Sahara , Programas de Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas de Inmunización/tendencias , Lactante , Preescolar , Teorema de Bayes , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/tendencias
3.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2356342, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780570

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted healthcare systems at all levels globally, notably affecting routine healthcare services, such as childhood vaccination. This study examined the impact of these disruptions on routine childhood vaccination programmes in Tanzania. We conducted a longitudinal study over four years in five Tanzanian regions: Mwanza, Dar es Salaam, Mtwara, Arusha, and Dodoma. This study analyzed the trends in the use of six essential vaccines: Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (bOPV), Diphtheria Tetanus Pertussis, Hepatitis-B and Hib (DTP-HepB-Hib), measles-rubella (MR), Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV), and Rota vaccines. We evaluated annual and monthly vaccination trends using time-series and regression analyses. Predictive modeling was performed using an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model. A total of 32,602,734 vaccination events were recorded across the regions from 2019 to 2022. Despite declining vaccination rates in 2020, there was a notable rebound in 2021, indicating the resilience of Tanzania's immunization program. The analysis also highlighted regional differences in vaccination rates when standardized per 1000 people. Seasonal fluctuations were observed in monthly vaccination rates, with BCG showing the most stable trend. Predictive modeling of BCG indicated stable and increasing vaccination coverage by 2023. These findings underscore the robustness of Tanzania's childhood immunization infrastructure in overcoming the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, as indicated by the strong recovery of vaccination rates post-2020. We provide valuable insights into the dynamics of vaccination during a global health crisis and highlight the importance of sustained immunization efforts to maintain public health.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Programas de Inmunización , Vacunación , Humanos , Tanzanía/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/tendencias , Estudios Longitudinales , Lactante , Preescolar , Programas de Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas de Inmunización/tendencias , Niño , Vacuna BCG/administración & dosificación , Vacuna BCG/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Pandemias/prevención & control
4.
Rev Med Suisse ; 20(872): 876-880, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693800

RESUMEN

Vaccine could take a central role in the strategy to reduce the burden of dengue. The development of an effective and safe vaccine must address various immunological challenges. Several vaccines are currently in development. To date, two live-attenuated vaccines have been deployed. Both have an effectiveness that varies depending on the serotypes. The deployment of the Dengvaxia vaccine, which began in 2015, was marked by a major safety alert leading to its use being restricted to previously dengue-seropositive people over 9 years old. The Qdenga vaccine is currently being deployed. There is for now insufficient data to ensure its safety in seronegative people. Some travelers, who have previously been infected with dengue, are a group for whom a vaccination recommendation applies.


Les vaccins pourraient occuper une place centrale dans la stratégie de réduction du fardeau de la dengue. Le développement d'un vaccin efficace et sûr est complexe car il doit relever plusieurs défis immunologiques. Différents vaccins sont en développement. À ce jour, deux vaccins vivants atténués ont été déployés. Tous deux ont une efficacité qui varie selon les sérotypes. Le déploiement du vaccin Dengvaxia, débuté en 2015, a été marqué par une alerte de sécurité majeure conduisant à restreindre son usage aux personnes de plus de 9 ans, préalablement séropositives pour la dengue. Le vaccin Qdenga est en cours de déploiement. Le recul est insuffisant pour assurer son innocuité chez les séronégatifs. Certains voyageurs, ayant déjà été infectés par la dengue, constituent un groupe pour lequel une recommandation vaccinale s'applique.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Dengue , Dengue , Vacunas Atenuadas , Humanos , Vacunas contra el Dengue/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra el Dengue/inmunología , Vacunas contra el Dengue/efectos adversos , Dengue/prevención & control , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunación/métodos , Vacunación/tendencias
5.
Epilepsy Behav ; 154: 109763, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38554646

RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate the impact of the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, its related social restriction measure (national lockdown) and vaccination campaign on emergency department (ED) accesses for epileptic seizures. METHODS: Retrospective observational analysis conducted on a consecutive cohort of patients who sought medical care at the ED of the General Hospital of Merano, Italy, from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021. We investigated the monthly ED attendances for epileptic seizures between the periods before and after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and the national lockdown (March 2020) using an interrupted time-series analysis with data standardized for 1000 accesses/month. As a further temporal cutoff, we used the start of the national vaccination campaign. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021, a total of 415,005 ED attendances were recorded; 1,254 (0.3 %) were due to epileptic seizures. No significant difference was found in the rate of standardized ED accesses for epileptic seizures in March 2020 (time point of interest) to the pre-pandemic trend (0.33/1000; 95 %CI: -1.05 to 1.71; p = 0.637). Similarly, there was no difference between the pre- and post-pandemic trends (-0.02/1000; 95 %CI: -0.11 to 0.06; p = 0.600). When adopting January 2021 as time point of interest, we found no difference to the pre-vaccination trend (0.83/1000; 95 %CI: -0.48 to 2.15), and no difference in the pre- and post-vaccination trends (-0.12/1000; 95 %CI: -0.27 to 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic and its related social restrictions (lockdown), as well as the COVID-19 national vaccination campaign, had little impact on ED accesses for epileptic seizures.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Epilepsia , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Italia/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunación/tendencias , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas de Inmunización/tendencias , Anciano
7.
Chest ; 165(6): 1341-1351, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38145716

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Challenges with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine prioritization, access, and hesitancy have influenced vaccination uptake. RESEARCH QUESTION: Was the impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine rollout on COVID-19 monthly admission and mortality trends different between Hispanic and non-Hispanic populations? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We used interrupted time series analysis to conduct an ancillary study of the Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study registry supplemented by electronic health record data from five participating Mayo Clinic sites in Florida, Arizona, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. We included hospitalized patients with COVID-19 admitted between April 2020 and December 2021. Our primary outcome was the impact of vaccine rollout on admission trends. Our secondary outcome was the impact of vaccine rollout on mortality trends. RESULTS: This interrupted time series analysis includes 6,442 patients. Vaccine rollout was associated with improved monthly hospital admission trends among both Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients. Among Hispanic patients, pre-vaccine rollout, monthly admissions increased by 12.9% (95% CI, 8.1%-17.9%). Immediately after vaccine rollout, patient admissions declined by -66.3% (95% CI, -75.6% to -53.9%). Post-vaccine rollout, monthly admissions increased by 3.7% (95% CI, 0.2%-7.3%). Among non-Hispanic patients, pre-vaccine rollout, monthly admissions increased by 35.8% (95% CI, 33.4%-38.1%). Immediately after vaccine rollout, patient admissions declined by -75.2% (95% CI, -77.6% to -72.7%). Post-vaccine rollout, monthly admissions increased by 5.6% (95% CI, 4.5%-6.7%). These pre-vaccine rollout admission trends were significantly different (P < .001). Post-vaccine rollout, the change in admission trend was significantly different (P < .001). The associated beneficial impact from vaccine rollout on monthly hospital admission trends among Hispanic patients was significantly lower. The trend in monthly mortality rate was fourfold greater (worse) among Hispanic patients (8.3%; 95% CI, 3.6%-13.4%) vs non-Hispanic patients (2.2%; 95% CI, 0.6%-3.8%), but this was not shown to be related to vaccine rollout. INTERPRETATION: SARS-CoV-2 vaccine rollout was associated with improved COVID-19 admission trends among non-Hispanic vs Hispanic patients. Vaccine rollout was not shown to influence mortality trends in either group, which were four times higher among Hispanic patients. Improved vaccine rollout may have reduced disparities in admission trends for Hispanic patients, but other factors influenced their mortality trends.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hispánicos o Latinos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/tendencias
10.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(13)2023 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37446157

RESUMEN

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of morbidity and death worldwide. Recent studies have demonstrated that this chronic inflammatory disease of the arterial wall can be controlled through the modulation of immune system activity. Many patients with cardiovascular disease remain at elevated risk of recurrent events despite receiving current, state-of-the-art preventive medical treatment. Much of this residual risk is attributed to inflammation. Therefore, finding new treatment strategies for this category of patients became of common interest. This review will discuss the experimental and clinical data supporting the possibility of developing immune-based therapies for lowering cardiovascular risk, explicitly focusing on vaccination strategies.


Asunto(s)
Aterosclerosis , Inmunomodulación , Humanos , Aterosclerosis/inmunología , Aterosclerosis/prevención & control , Aterosclerosis/terapia , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Inflamación , Vacunación/tendencias , Inmunidad Innata/inmunología , Inmunidad Adaptativa/inmunología , Inmunidad Humoral/inmunología , Autoantígenos/inmunología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Vacunas/inmunología , Vacunas/uso terapéutico
11.
Vaccine ; 41(36): 5322-5329, 2023 08 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37460352

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In December 2020 the U.S. began a massive COVID-19 vaccination campaign, an action that researchers felt could catalyze inequalities in COVID-19 vaccination utilization. While vaccines have the potential to be accessible regardless of social status, the objective of this study was to examine how and when socioeconomic status (SES) and racial/ethnic inequalities would emerge in vaccination distribution. METHODS: Population vaccination rates reported at the county level by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention across 46 states on 3/30/2021. Correlates included SES, the share of the population who were Black, Hispanic, Female, or aged ≥65 years, and urbanicity (thousands of residents per square mile). Multivariable-adjusted analyses relied on zero-inflated negative binomial regression to estimate the odds of providing any vaccine, and vaccination rate ratios (aVRR) comparing the distribution rate for vaccinations across the U.S. RESULTS: Across the U.S., 16.3 % of adults and 37.9 % of adults aged 65 and older were vaccinated in lower SES counties, while 20.45 % of all adults and 48.15 % of adults aged 65 and older were vaccinated in higher SES counties. Inequalities emerged after 41 days, when < 2 % of Americans were vaccinated. Multivariable-adjusted analyses revealed that higher SES was associated with improved vaccination distribution (aVRR = 1.127, [1.100-1.155], p < 1E-06), while increases in the percent reporting Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity was associated with lower vaccination distribution (aVRR = 0.998, [0.996-0.999], p = 1.03E-04). CONCLUSIONS: Social inequalities in COVID-19 vaccines reflect an inefficient and inequitable distribution of these technologies. Future efforts to improve health should recognize the central role of social factors in impacting vaccine delivery.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunación , Vacunas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Negro o Afroamericano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/tendencias
15.
Goiânia; SES-GO; 23 ago. 2022. 9 p. ilus.
No convencional en Portugués | SES-GO, LILACS, CONASS, ColecionaSUS | ID: biblio-1391037

RESUMEN

A vacinação é a principal ferramenta de prevenção primária de doenças e uma das medidas mais bem-sucedidas em saúde pública, com melhor custo-efetividade (ABBAS et al , 2006; WHO, 2021a). Além disso, a imunização evita incapacidades e cerca de 2 a 3 milhões de mortes, em todo o mundo, a cada ano (UE, 2020; PAHO, 2022; WATSON et al., 2022). Não obstante os esforços implementados por organizações internacionais e locais, dados da OMS apontam que a cobertura vacinal global caiu de 86% em 2019 para 81% em 2021, o que significa que cerca de 25 milhões de crianças menores de 1 ano não receberam as vacinas básicas (WHO, 2021a). Já no Brasil (Figura 1), a cobertura manteve-se estável de 1999 a 2015 e em contrapartida, em 2016 e no último triênio, apresenta tendência de queda (BRASIL, 2022b). Diante dessa realidade, objetivou-se investigar as estratégias utilizadas para ampliar a vacinação, e assim, subsidiar a formulação e tomada de decisão em políticas públicas para mitigar a baixa cobertura vacinal


Vaccination is the main tool for primary disease prevention and one of the most successful and cost-effective public health measures (ABBAS et al , 2006; WHO, 2021a). In addition, immunization prevents disability and an estimated 2 to 3 million deaths worldwide each year (EU, 2020; PAHO, 2022; WATSON et al., 2022). Notwithstanding the efforts implemented by international and local organizations, WHO data indicate that global vaccination coverage dropped from 86% in 2019 to 81% in 2021, which means that about 25 million children under 1 year of age do not received the basic vaccines (WHO, 2021a). In Brazil (Figure 1), coverage remained stable from 1999 to 2015 and, on the other hand, in 2016 and in the last three years, it shows a downward trend (BRASIL, 2022b). Faced with this reality, the objective was to investigate the strategies used to expand vaccination, and thus subsidize the formulation and decision-making in public policies to mitigate the low vaccination coverage


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/tendencias , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura de Vacunación/historia , Cobertura de Vacunación/tendencias
17.
BMC Med ; 20(1): 199, 2022 05 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35606803

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As we are confronted with more transmissible/severe variants with immune escape and the waning of vaccine efficacy, it is particularly relevant to understand how the social contacts of individuals at greater risk of COVID-19 complications evolved over time. We described time trends in social contacts of individuals according to comorbidity and vaccination status before and during the first three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec, Canada. METHODS: We used data from CONNECT, a repeated cross-sectional population-based survey of social contacts conducted before (2018/2019) and during the pandemic (April 2020 to July 2021). We recruited non-institutionalized adults from Quebec, Canada, by random digit dialling. We used a self-administered web-based questionnaire to measure the number of social contacts of participants (two-way conversation at a distance ≤2 m or a physical contact, irrespective of masking). We compared the mean number of contacts/day according to the comorbidity status of participants (pre-existing medical conditions with symptoms/medication in the past 12 months) and 1-dose vaccination status during the third wave. All analyses were performed using weighted generalized linear models with a Poisson distribution and robust variance. RESULTS: A total of 1441 and 5185 participants with and without comorbidities, respectively, were included in the analyses. Contacts significantly decreased from a mean of 6.1 (95%CI 4.9-7.3) before the pandemic to 3.2 (95%CI 2.5-3.9) during the first wave among individuals with comorbidities and from 8.1 (95%CI 7.3-9.0) to 2.7 (95%CI 2.2-3.2) among individuals without comorbidities. Individuals with comorbidities maintained fewer contacts than those without comorbidities in the second wave, with a significant difference before the Christmas 2020/2021 holidays (2.9 (95%CI 2.5-3.2) vs 3.9 (95%CI 3.5-4.3); P<0.001). During the third wave, contacts were similar for individuals with (4.1, 95%CI 3.4-4.7) and without comorbidities (4.5, 95%CI 4.1-4.9; P=0.27). This could be partly explained by individuals with comorbidities vaccinated with their first dose who increased their contacts to the level of those without comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: It will be important to closely monitor COVID-19-related outcomes and social contacts by comorbidity and vaccination status to inform targeted or population-based interventions (e.g., booster doses of the vaccine).


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trazado de Contacto , Cobertura de Vacunación , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Comorbilidad , Trazado de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Trazado de Contacto/tendencias , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Conducta Social , Factores de Tiempo , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/tendencias , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura de Vacunación/tendencias
18.
PLoS One ; 17(3): e0264994, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35271637

RESUMEN

COVID-19 severely impacted world health and, as a consequence of the measures implemented to stop the spread of the virus, also irreversibly damaged the world economy. Research shows that receiving the COVID-19 vaccine is the most successful measure to combat the virus and could also address its indirect consequences. However, vaccine hesitancy is growing worldwide and the WHO names this hesitancy as one of the top ten threats to global health. This study investigates the trend in positive attitudes towards vaccines across ten countries since a positive attitude is important. Furthermore, we investigate those variables related to having a positive attitude, as these factors could potentially increase the uptake of vaccines. We derive our text corpus from vaccine-related tweets, harvested in real-time from Twitter. Using Natural Language Processing (NLP), we derive the sentiment and emotions contained in the tweets to construct daily time-series data. We analyse a panel dataset spanning both the Northern and Southern hemispheres from 1 February 2021 to 31 July 2021. To determine the relationship between several variables and the positive sentiment (attitude) towards vaccines, we run various models, including POLS, Panel Fixed Effects and Instrumental Variables estimations. Our results show that more information about vaccines' safety and the expected side effects are needed to increase positive attitudes towards vaccines. Additionally, government procurement and the vaccine rollout should improve. Accessibility to the vaccine should be a priority, and a collective effort should be made to increase positive messaging about the vaccine, especially on social media. The results of this study contribute to the understanding of the emotional challenges associated with vaccine uptake and inform policymakers, health workers, and stakeholders who communicate to the public during infectious disease outbreaks. Additionally, the global fight against COVID-19 might be lost if the attitude towards vaccines is not improved.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Vacilación a la Vacunación/psicología , Vacunación/psicología , Actitud , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/farmacología , Emociones , Salud Global , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural , Optimismo , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/tendencias , Vacilación a la Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacilación a la Vacunación/tendencias , Vacunas
20.
Vaccine ; 40(9): 1246-1252, 2022 02 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35125221

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Between May 2005 and March 2007, three vaccines were recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for routine use in adolescents in the United States: quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY), tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap), and human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV). Understanding historical adolescent vaccination patterns may inform future vaccination coverage efforts for these and emerging adolescent vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: This was a descriptive, retrospective cohort study. All vaccines administered to adolescents aged 11 through 18 years in the Vaccine Safety Datalink population between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016 were examined. Vaccination coverage was assessed by study year for ≥1 dose Tdap or Td, ≥1 dose Tdap, ≥1 dose MenACWY, ≥1 dose HPV, and ≥3 dose HPV. The proportion of vaccine visits with concurrent vaccination (≥2 vaccines administered at the same visit) was calculated by sex and study year. The most common vaccine combinations administered in the study population were described by sex for two time periods: 2007-2010 and 2011-2016. RESULTS: The number of 11-18-year-olds in the study population averaged 522,565 males and 503,112 females per study year. Between January 2007 and December 2016 there were 4,884,553 vaccine visits in this population (45% among males). The overall proportion of concurrent vaccine visits among males was 43% (33-61% by study year). Among females, 39% of all vaccine visits included concurrent vaccination (32-48% by study year). Vaccine coverage for Tdap, MenACWY, and 1- and 3-dose HPV increased across the study period. A wide variety of vaccine combinations were administered among both sexes and in both time periods. CONCLUSIONS: The high vaccine uptake and multitude of vaccine combinations administered concurrently in the adolescent population of the Vaccine Safety Datalink provide historical patterns with which to compare future adolescent vaccination campaigns.


Asunto(s)
Vacunación , Vacunas , Adolescente , COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Masculino , Vacunas Meningococicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Meningococicas/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos , Vacunación/tendencias , Vacunas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA