Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 180
Filtrar
1.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2400751, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39279284

RESUMEN

In September 2023, 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) was replaced by 15-valent PCV (PCV15) in Sweden's pediatric national immunization program. Following European approval of 20-valent PCV (PCV20) in March 2024, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of PCV20 versus PCV15, both under 2 + 1 schedule, among Sweden's pediatric population. A Markov state-transition model evaluated the economic and health benefits of PCV20 versus PCV15 among all ages over a 10-year time horizon. The base case adopted a Swedish payer perspective with an annual cycle length and 3.0% discount rate for costs and outcomes. Country-specific data informed population size, epidemiology, costs, and quality of life estimates. PCV15/PCV20 effect estimates were informed by PCV13 clinical effectiveness and impact studies plus PCV7 efficacy studies. Sensitivity analyses evaluated model robustness, including PCV20 under a 3 + 1 schedule. PCV20 was associated with higher quality-adjusted life year gains versus PCV15, averting an estimated 3,116 invasive pneumococcal disease cases 21,109 inpatient pneumonia cases, 6,618 outpatient pneumonia cases, and 36,209 otitis media cases, plus 3,281 pneumococcal disease-related deaths. PCV20 yielded substantial cost savings exceeding 5.4 billion SEK over a 10-year time horizon, primarily attributed to reduced direct medical costs due to improved health outcomes compared with PCV15. The findings confirmed the dominance of PCV20 in the base case, which remained robust across deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses as well as scenario assessments. PCV20 was the dominant strategy versus PCV15 over 10 years. The broader serotype coverage of PCV20 suggests superior clinical and economic advantages over PCV15, warranting inclusion in Sweden's pediatric immunization program.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Vacunas Neumococicas , Vacunas Conjugadas , Humanos , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Suecia/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Preescolar , Lactante , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Niño , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Programas de Inmunización/economía , Cadenas de Markov , Recién Nacido
2.
Lancet Glob Health ; 12(9): e1485-e1497, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39151983

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Streptococcus pneumoniae has been estimated to cause 9·18 million cases of pneumococcal pneumonia, meningitis, and invasive non-pneumonia non-meningitis disease and 318 000 deaths among children younger than 5 years in 2015. We estimated the potential impact and cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) introduction. METHODS: We updated our existing pseudodynamic model to estimate the impact of 13-valent PCV (PCV13) in 112 low-income and middle-income countries by adapting our previously published pseudodynamic model with new country-specific evidence on vaccine coverage, burden, and post-introduction vaccine impact from WHO-UNICEF estimates of national immunisation coverage and a global burden study. Deaths, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and cases averted were estimated for children younger than 5 years born between 2000 and 2030. We used specific PCV coverage in each country and a hypothetical scenario in which coverage increased to diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) levels. We conducted probabilistic uncertainty analyses. FINDINGS: Using specific vaccine coverage in countries, we estimated that PCV13 could prevent 697 000 (95% credibility interval 359 000-1 040 000) deaths, 46·0 (24·0-68·9) million DALYs, and 131 (89·0-172) million cases in 112 countries between 2000 and 2030. PCV was estimated to prevent 5·3% of pneumococcal deaths in children younger than 5 years during 2000-30. The incremental cost of vaccination would be I$851 (510-1530) per DALY averted. If PCV coverage were increased to DTP coverage in 2020, PCV13 could prevent an additional 146 000 (75 500-219 000) deaths. INTERPRETATION: The inclusion of real-world evidence from lower-income settings revealed that delays in PCV roll-out globally and low PCV coverage have cost many lives. Countries with delays in vaccine introduction or low vaccine coverage have experienced many PCV-preventable deaths. These findings underscore the importance of rapidly scaling up PCV to achieve high coverage and maximise vaccine impact. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Países en Desarrollo , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Vacunas Neumococicas , Vacunas Conjugadas , Humanos , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Lactante , Preescolar , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación
3.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1383668, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39148654

RESUMEN

Background: Streptococcus pneumonia is responsible for 18% of infant deaths in Ghana. With co-financing from Gavi in 2012, Ghana introduced the PCV13 into the childhood immunization programme to reduce the burden of Streptococcus pneumonia. However, Ghana will graduate to the Gavi fully self-financing phase in 2026, when the nation assumes full responsibility of paying for the PCV13. This research aims to evaluate the health impact and cost-effectiveness of PCV13 immunization in Ghana since its implementation and after the cessation of support from Gavi. Methods: We used the UNIVAC tool to evaluate two main scenarios of cost-effectiveness, from vaccine introduction (2012-2025) and after Gavi transition (2026-2031) in comparison with no vaccination. The sources of data include national data, international estimates and expert opinion. Cost was considered from both the government and societal perspectives. We discounted health outcomes at 3%. Currency values were stated in US Dollars. We tested the robustness of the base case results by performing scenario and sensitivity analyses. Results: PCV13 will reduce the pneumococcal disease burden by 48% from 2012 to 2031. The vaccination programme costs are USD 130 million and USD 275 million in 2012-2025 and 2026-2031 respectively. It also has a budget impact of USD 280 million for the 2026-2031 period from the perspective of government. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are USD 89 and USD 73 respectively from the perspectives of government and society in 2012-2025. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are USD 530 and USD 510 respectively from the perspectives of government and society in 2026-2031. Conclusion: The PCV13 vaccination programme in Ghana is cost-effective at 50% GDP per capita threshold even when Gavi withdraws co-financing support from 2026 onwards.


Asunto(s)
Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , Programas de Inmunización , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Vacunas Neumococicas , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Ghana , Programas de Inmunización/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunación/economía , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía
4.
Vaccine ; 42(23): 126043, 2024 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879409

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) has been recommended for infants in Argentina's national immunization program (NIP) in a 2 + 1 schedule since 2012. Licensure of the 15-valent vaccine (PCV15) is anticipated soon, and the 20-valent vaccine (PCV20) recently received regulatory approval. This cost-effectiveness analysis examined the public health and economic implications of transitioning from PCV13 to either PCV15 or PCV20 in Argentina's pediatric NIP. METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov model was used with a 10-year time horizon and a 3.0% annual discount rate for costs and benefits. Vaccine effectiveness estimates were derived from Argentinian surveillance data, PCV13 clinical effectiveness and impact studies, and PCV7 efficacy studies. Population, epidemiologic, and economic inputs were obtained from literature and Argentinian-specific data. The study adopted a healthcare system perspective; sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to assess input parameters and structural uncertainty. RESULTS: Compared with PCV13, PCV20 was estimated to avert an additional 7,378, 42,884, and 172,389 cases of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), all-cause pneumonia, and all-cause otitis media (OM), respectively, as well as 3,308 deaths, resulting in savings of United States Dollars (USD) 50,973,962 in direct medical costs. Compared with PCV15, PCV20 was also estimated to have greater benefit, averting an additional 6,140, 35,258, and 142,366 cases of IPD, pneumonia, and OM, respectively, as well as 2,624 deaths, resulting in savings of USD 37,697,868 in direct medical costs. PCV20 was associated with a higher quality-adjusted life year gain and a lower cost (i.e., dominance) versus both PCV13 and PCV15. Results remained robust in sensitivity analyses and scenario assessments. CONCLUSION: Over a 10-year horizon, vaccination with PCV20 was expected to be the dominant, cost-saving strategy versus PCV13 and PCV15 in children in Argentina. Policymakers should consider the PCV20 vaccination strategy to achieve the greatest clinical and economic benefit compared with lower-valent options.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Vacunas Neumococicas , Vacunas Conjugadas , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Humanos , Argentina/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Lactante , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/inmunología , Preescolar , Programas de Inmunización/economía , Cadenas de Markov , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad
5.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 72(8): 2423-2433, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822745

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multiple factors, such as less complex U.S. adult pneumococcal recommendations that could increase vaccination rates, childhood pneumococcal vaccination indirect effects that decrease adult vaccination impact, and increased vaccine hesitancy (particularly in underserved minorities), could diminish the cost-effectiveness of programs to increase pneumococcal vaccination in older adults. Prior analyses supported the economic favorability of these programs. METHODS: A Markov model compared no vaccination and current recommendations (either 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [PCV20] alone or 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine plus the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PCV15/PPSV23]) without or with programs to increase vaccine uptake in Black and non-Black 65-year-old cohorts. Pre-pandemic population- and serotype-specific pneumococcal disease risk and illness/vaccine costs came from U.S. DATABASES: Program costs were $2.19 per vaccine-eligible person and increased absolute vaccination likelihood by 7.5%. Delphi panel estimates and trial data informed vaccine effectiveness values. Analyses took a healthcare perspective, discounting at 3%/year over a lifetime time horizon. RESULTS: Uptake programs decreased pneumococcal disease overall. In Black cohorts, PCV20 without program cost $216,805 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with no vaccination; incremental cost-effectiveness was $245,546/QALY for PCV20 with program and $425,264/QALY for PCV15/PPSV23 with program. In non-Black cohorts, all strategies cost >$200,000/QALY gained. When considering the potential indirect effects from childhood vaccination, all strategies became less economically attractive. Increased vaccination with less complex strategies had negligible effects. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, current recommendations with or without programs were unlikely to be favored at thresholds <$200,000/QALY gained. CONCLUSION: Current U.S. pneumococcal vaccination recommendations for older adults were unlikely to be economically reasonable with or without programs to increase vaccine uptake. Alternatives to current pneumococcal vaccines that include pneumococcal serotypes associated with adult disease should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Vacunas Neumococicas , Vacunación , Humanos , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Vacunación/economía , Cadenas de Markov , Programas de Inmunización/economía , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
6.
Vaccine ; 42(22): 126000, 2024 Sep 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38845302

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) compared to 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) for the pediatric population in Korea, where the four-dose vaccine coverage rate is over 97%. METHODS: We constructed a Markov model to calculate the cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over 10 years. The health states were susceptible states; disease states, which included invasive pneumococcal diseases such as meningitis, bacteremia, pneumonia, and acute otitis media; and death attributable to pneumococcal disease. The annual incidence and mortality due to pneumococcal diseases were estimated based on the serotypes covered by PCV13 and PCV20, vaccine coverage rate, vaccine effectiveness, and population size. Vaccine, administration, and disease costs were included in the model. RESULTS: In the total population (n = 51,431,305), PCV20 prevented more pneumococcal diseases and deaths, resulting in a gain of 74,855 QALY over PCV13. Meanwhile, the PCV20 group spent $275,136,631 less than the PCV13 group. As PCV20 gained more QALYs but spent less on total medical costs than PCV13, PCV20 was dominant over PCV13. CONCLUSIONS: In the Korean population, PCV20 is a cost-effective and dominant option over PCV13. Our findings provide evidence for decision-making regarding the introduction of PCV20 in countries with high vaccine coverage.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Vacunas Neumococicas , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Vacunas Conjugadas , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Humanos , República de Corea/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/inmunología , Preescolar , Lactante , Niño , Cadenas de Markov , Masculino , Femenino , Streptococcus pneumoniae/inmunología , Adolescente , Incidencia , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad
7.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 23(1): 546-560, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703180

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) is used in the Japanese National Immunization Program for older adults and adults with increased risk for pneumococcal disease, however, disease incidence and associated burden remain high. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) for adults aged 65 years and high-risk adults aged 60-64 years in Japan. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using a Markov model, we evaluated lifetime costs using societal and healthcare payer perspectives and estimated quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and number of prevented cases and deaths caused by invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and non-IPD. The base case analysis used a societal perspective. RESULTS: In comparison with PPSV23, the 20-valent PCV (PCV20) prevented 127 IPD cases 10,813 non-IPD cases (inpatients: 2,461, outpatients: 8,352) and 226 deaths, and gained more QALYs (+0.0015 per person) with less cost (-JPY22,513 per person). All sensitivity and scenario analyses including a payer perspective analysis indicated that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were below the cost-effectiveness threshold value in Japan (JPY5 million/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: PCV20 is both cost saving and more effective than PPSV23 for adults aged 65 years and high-risk adults aged 60-64 years in Japan.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Neumocócicas , Vacunas Neumococicas , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , Japón/epidemiología , Cadenas de Markov , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/inmunología
8.
Vaccine ; 42(18): 3838-3850, 2024 Jul 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763851

RESUMEN

Pneumococcal disease, presenting as invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is an important cause of illness and hospitalisation in the elderly. To reduce pneumococcal burden, since 2003, 65-year-olds in England have been offered a 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23). This study compares the impact and cost-effectiveness (CE) of vaccination with the existing PPV23 vaccine to the new 15-and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV15 and PCV20), targeting adults aged 65 or 75 years old. We developed a static Markov model for immunisation against pneumococcal disease, capturing different vaccine effectiveness and immunity waning assumptions, projecting the number of IPD/CAP cases averted over the thirty years following vaccination. Using an economic model and probabilistic sensitivity analysis we evaluated the CE of the different immunisation strategies at current vaccine list prices and the willingness-to-pay at a median threshold of £20,000/QALY and an uncertainty threshold of 90% of simulations below £30,000/QALY. PCV20 averted more IPD and CAP cases than PCV15 or PPV23 over the thirty years following vaccination: 353(360), 145(159) and 150(174) IPD and 581(673), 259(485) and 212(235) CAP cases at a vaccination age of 65(75) under base vaccine effectiveness assumptions. At the listed prices of PCV20 and PPV23 vaccines as of May 2023, both vaccines were cost-effective when vaccinating 65- or 75-year-olds with an ICER threshold of £20,000 per QALY. To achieve the same cost-effectiveness as PPV23, the additional cost of PCV20 should be less than £44(£91) at an ICER threshold of £20,000/QALY (£30,000/QALY) if vaccination age is 65 (or £54(£103) if vaccination age is increased to 75). We showed that both PPV23 and PCV20 were likely to be cost-effective. PCV20 was likely to avert more cases of pneumococcal disease in elderly adults in England than the current PPV23 vaccine, given input assumptions of a higher vaccine effectiveness and slower waning for PCV20.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Vacunas Neumococicas , Humanos , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Anciano , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Vacunación/economía , Vacunación/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/inmunología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/prevención & control , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/economía , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Cadenas de Markov , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
9.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0297098, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38564583

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute otitis media (AOM) is a common childhood disease frequently caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV7, PCV10, PCV13) can reduce the risk of AOM but may also shift AOM etiology and serotype distribution. The aim of this study was to review estimates from published literature of the burden of AOM in Europe after widespread use of PCVs over the past 10 years, focusing on incidence, etiology, serotype distribution and antibiotic resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae, and economic burden. METHODS: This systematic review included published literature from 31 European countries, for children aged ≤5 years, published after 2011. Searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase, Google, and three disease conference websites. Risk of bias was assessed with ISPOR-AMCP-NPC, ECOBIAS or ROBIS, depending on the type of study. RESULTS: In total, 107 relevant records were identified, which revealed wide variation in study methodology and reporting, thus limiting comparisons across outcomes. No homogenous trends were identified in incidence rates across countries, or in detection of S. pneumoniae as a cause of AOM over time. There were indications of a reduction in hospitalization rates (decreases between 24.5-38.8% points, depending on country, PCV type and time since PCV introduction) and antibiotic resistance (decreases between 14-24%, depending on country), following the widespread use of PCVs over time. The last two trends imply a potential decrease in economic burden, though this was not possible to confirm with the identified cost data. There was also evidence of an increase in serotype distributions towards non-vaccine serotypes in all of the countries where non-PCV serotype data were available, as well as limited data of increased antibiotic resistance within non-vaccine serotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Though some factors point to a reduction in AOM burden in Europe, the burden still remains high, residual burden from uncovered serotypes is present and it is difficult to provide comprehensive, accurate and up-to-date estimates of said burden from the published literature. This could be improved by standardised methodology, reporting and wider use of surveillance systems.


Asunto(s)
Otitis Media , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Vacunas Neumococicas , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Humanos , Otitis Media/epidemiología , Otitis Media/economía , Otitis Media/microbiología , Otitis Media/prevención & control , Streptococcus pneumoniae/patogenicidad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/microbiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Preescolar , Enfermedad Aguda , Incidencia , Lactante , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía , Vacunas Conjugadas/uso terapéutico
10.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 23(1): 485-497, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38682661

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Japanese National Immunization Program currently includes the pediatric 13 valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) to prevent pneumococcal infections. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 20-valent PCV (PCV20) as a pediatric vaccine versus PCV13. METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov model was used to estimate expected costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and prevented cases and deaths caused by invasive pneumococcal disease, pneumonia, and acute otitis media over a ten-year time horizon from the societal and healthcare payer perspectives. RESULTS: PCV20 was dominant, i.e. less costly and more effective, over PCV13 (gained 294,599 QALYs and reduced Japanese yen [JPY] 352.6 billion [2.6 billion United States dollars, USD] from the societal perspective and JPY 178.9 billion [USD 1.4 billion] from the payer perspective). Sensitivity and scenario analyses validated the robustness of the base scenario results. When comparing PCV20 with PCV13, the threshold analysis revealed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio that was within the threshold value (JPY 5 million/QALY) at a maximum acquisition cost of JPY 74,033 [USD 563] (societal perspective) and JPY 67,758 [USD 515] (payer perspective). CONCLUSIONS: As a pediatric vaccine, PCV20 was dominant over PCV13 regardless of the study perspective.


Asunto(s)
Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Vacunas Neumococicas , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Programas de Inmunización/economía , Japón/epidemiología , Cadenas de Markov , Otitis Media/prevención & control , Otitis Media/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía
11.
Vaccine ; 42(13): 3239-3246, 2024 May 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609806

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the health and economic outcomes of a PCV13 or PCV15 age-based (65 years-and-above) vaccination program in Switzerland. INTERVENTIONS: The three vaccination strategies examined were:Target population: All adults aged 65 years-and-above. Perspective(s): Switzerland health care payer. TIME HORIZON: 35 years. Discount rate: 3.0%. Costing year: 2023 Swiss Francs (CHF). STUDY DESIGN: A static Markov state-transition model. DATA SOURCES: Published literature and publicly available databases or reports. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pneumococcal diseases (PD) i.e., invasive pneumococcal diseases (IPD) and non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia (NBPP); total quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), total costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (CHF/QALY gained). RESULTS: Using an assumed coverage of 60%, the PCV15 strategy prevented a substantially higher number of cases/deaths than the PCV13 strategy when compared to the No vaccination strategy (1,078 IPD; 21,155 NBPP; 493 deaths). The overall total QALYs were 10,364,620 (PCV15), 10,364,070 (PCV13), and 10,362,490 (no vaccination). The associated overall total costs were CHF 741,949,814 (PCV15), CHF 756,051,954 (PCV13) and CHF 698,329,579 (no vaccination). Thus, the PCV13 strategy was strongly dominated by the PCV15 strategy. The ICER of the PCV15 strategy (vs. no vaccination) was CHF 20,479/QALY gained. In two scenario analyses where the vaccine effectiveness for serotype 3 were reduced (75% to 39.3% for IPD; 45% to 23.6% for NBPP) and NBPP incidence was increased (from 1,346 to 1,636/100,000), the resulting ICERs were CHF 29,432 and CHF 13,700/QALY gained, respectively. The deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the qualitative results-the estimated ICERs for the PCV15 strategy (vs. No vaccination) were all below CHF 30,000/QALYs gained. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that using PCV15 among adults aged 65 years-and-above can prevent a substantial number of PD cases and deaths while remaining cost-effective over a range of inputs and scenarios.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Programas de Inmunización , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Vacunas Neumococicas , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Suiza/epidemiología , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Programas de Inmunización/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Vacunación/economía , Cadenas de Markov , Streptococcus pneumoniae/inmunología , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/inmunología , Neumonía Neumocócica/prevención & control , Neumonía Neumocócica/economía
12.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(13)2021 03 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33758096

RESUMEN

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a serious threat to global public health. However, vaccinations have been largely undervalued as a method to hinder AMR progression. This study examined the AMR impact of increasing pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) coverage in China. China has one of the world's highest rates of antibiotic use and low PCV coverage. We developed an agent-based DREAMR (Dynamic Representation of the Economics of AMR) model to examine the health and economic benefits of slowing AMR against commonly used antibiotics. We simulated PCV coverage, pneumococcal infections, antibiotic use, and AMR accumulation. Four antibiotics to treat pneumococcal diseases (penicillin, amoxicillin, third-generation cephalosporins, and meropenem) were modeled with antibiotic utilization, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics factored into predicting AMR accumulation. Three PCV coverage scenarios were simulated over 5 y: 1) status quo with no change in coverage, 2) scaled coverage increase to 99% in 5 y, and 3) accelerated coverage increase to 85% over 2 y followed by 3 y to reach 99% coverage. Compared to the status quo, we found that AMR against penicillin, amoxicillin, and third-generation cephalosporins was significantly reduced by 6.6%, 10.9%, and 9.8% in the scaled scenario and by 10.5%, 17.0%, and 15.4% in the accelerated scenario. Cumulative costs due to AMR, including direct and indirect costs to patients and caretakers, were reduced by $371 million in the scaled and $586 million in the accelerated scenarios compared to the status quo. AMR-reducing benefits of vaccines are essential to quantify in order to drive appropriate investment.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación Masiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Preescolar , China/epidemiología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Vacunación Masiva/economía , Modelos Económicos , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/mortalidad , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Cobertura de Vacunación/economía , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía
13.
Int J Infect Dis ; 97: 182-189, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32474199

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing a domestic pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7-TT) into the Cuban National Immunization Program (NIP). METHODS: We compared PCV7-TT given at two, four and six months of age to a scenario without PCV7-TT, over a ten-year period (2020-2029). We calculated the cost (Cuban pesos - CUP) per Disability Adjusted Life Year (DALY) averted from a Government perspective. We compared results from a static cohort model and a parsimonious prediction model informed by the serotype distribution among pneumococcal carriers and cases. We ran probabilistic and deterministic uncertainty analyses. RESULTS: PCV7-TT could prevent 6897 (95% uncertainty interval, 4344-8750) hospitalizations and 189 (115-253) deaths in children <5 years of age, over the period 2020-2029. This could cost around 25 million (20-31) discounted CUP but would be offset by treatment cost savings of around 23 million (14-31). A parsimonious model predicted less favourable impact and cost-effectiveness but the cost per DALY averted was still less than 0.4 times the current GDP per capita. CONCLUSIONS: PCV7-TT is likely to be cost-effective in Cuba. The impact of the vaccine would need to be carefully monitored following its introduction into the NIP.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Inmunización/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Algoritmos , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Cuba , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Infecciones Neumocócicas/inmunología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/microbiología , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Streptococcus pneumoniae/inmunología , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía , Vacunas Conjugadas/inmunología
14.
Am J Prev Med ; 58(4): 487-495, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32001052

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Recommending both the conjugate and polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines to all U.S. seniors may have little public health impact and be economically unreasonable. Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of using both vaccines in all adults aged ≥65 years were estimated compared with an alternative strategy (omitting pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the nonimmunocompromised) and with the newly revised recommendation (giving or omitting conjugate vaccine based on patient-physician shared decision making). METHODS: Strategies were examined in hypothetical U.S. 65-year-old population cohorts and segmented into health states based on age- and population-specific data in a Markov state-transition model with a lifetime time horizon from a healthcare perspective. Black population cohorts were examined separately given greater illness risk and lower vaccine uptake. Model parameters came from the Centers for Disease Control Active Core Bacterial Surveillance network, National Health Interview Survey, and Nationwide Inpatient Sample data. Outcomes included incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year gained and pneumococcal disease outcomes for each strategy. Data were gathered and analysis performed in 2018. RESULTS: Giving both vaccines, either routinely or with shared decision making, was most effective, reducing pneumococcal disease incidence compared with no vaccination, but costing $765,000-$2.18 million/quality-adjusted life year gained. Depending on examined population and scenario, the alternative strategy cost $65,700-$226,700/quality-adjusted life year gained (less in black populations) and reduced cases and deaths by 0.3%-0.9%. CONCLUSIONS: A vaccination strategy that omits pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in immunocompetent U.S. seniors may be economically reasonable, particularly for black seniors. Use of both pneumococcal vaccines was more effective but substantially more expensive.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunación/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Estados Unidos , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía
16.
PLoS One ; 15(1): e0227945, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31995597

RESUMEN

Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Pneumococcal vaccination is part of the South African pediatric public immunization program but the potential cost-effectiveness of such an intervention for adults is unknown. This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of two widely used pneumococcal vaccines: pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) in South African adults, 18 years and older. Four analyses were carried out in a) both the private and public health care sectors; and b) for the HIV-infected population alone and for the total mixed population (all HIV-infected and -uninfected people). A previously published global pharmacoeconomic model was adapted and populated to represent the South African adult population. The model utilized a Markov-type process to depict the lifetime clinical and economic outcomes of patients who acquire pneumococcal disease in 2015, from a societal perspective. Costs were sourced in South African rand and converted to US dollar (USD). The incremental cost divided by the incremental effectiveness (expressed as quality-adjusted life years gained) represented the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for PCV13 compared to PPSV23. Results indicated that the use of PCV13 compared to PPSV23 is highly cost-effective in the public sector cohorts with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $771 (R11,106)/quality-adjusted life year and $956 (R13,773)/quality-adjusted life year for the HIV-infected and mixed populations, respectively. The private sector cohort showed similar highly cost-effective results for the mixed population (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $626 (R9,013)/quality-adjusted life year) and the HIV-infected cohort (dominant). In sensitivity analysis, the model was sensitive to vaccine price and effectiveness. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses found predominantly cost-effective ICERs. From a societal perspective, these findings provide some guidance to policy makers for consideration and implementation of an immunization strategy for both the public and private sector and amongst different adult patient pools in South Africa.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunización , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/microbiología , Vacunas Neumococicas/uso terapéutico , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía , Vacunas Conjugadas/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
17.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 26(1): 60-70, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31055164

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Of over 90 serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae, only seven were included in the first pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV). While PCV reduced the disease incidence, in part because of a herd immunity effect, a replacement effect was observed whereby disease was increasingly caused by serotypes not included in the vaccine. Dynamic transmission models can account for these effects to describe post-vaccination scenarios, whereas economic evaluations can enable decision-makers to compare vaccines of increasing valency for implementation. AIM: The aim of this review was to examine epidemiological and economic models and their assumptions for their potential contributions to future research and immunisation policy. SOURCES: Pubmed, Scopus, Ovid, ISI Web of Knowledge, Centre of Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) databases were searched. CONTENT: Twenty-three dynamic transmission models and 21 economic models were retrieved and reviewed. Published models employed various templates, revealing several key uncertainties regarding the biology and epidemiology of pneumococcal infection. While models suggested that PCVs will reduce the burden of disease, the extent to which they are predicted to do so depended on various assumptions regarding features of pneumococcal infection and epidemiology that governed PCV cost-effectiveness as well. Such features include the duration of protection and competitive interactions between serotypes, which are unclear at present, but which directly relate to herd immunity and serotype replacement. IMPLICATIONS: Economic evaluations are not typically based on transmission dynamic models and hence omit indirect herd immunity effects. The two tools could be used in conjunction to inform decision-makers on vaccine implementation, but so far there have been few attempts to build economic evaluations on transmission dynamic models, and none in this field. Future directions for research could include studies to evaluate key parameters for the models involving herd immunity, serotype competition and the natural history of infection.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Modelos Económicos , Infecciones Neumocócicas/transmisión , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunas Neumococicas/normas , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Humanos , Inmunidad Colectiva , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Serogrupo , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Vacunación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Vacunación/tendencias , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía , Vacunas Conjugadas/normas
18.
Vaccine ; 37(52): 7547-7559, 2019 12 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31607600

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To support vaccine decision-making we estimated from the societal perspective the potential health impact and costs averted through immunization with three vaccines - Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) and rotavirus vaccine (RVV). METHODS: Based on variability in disease burden, strength of health system and economic status, we selected four states in India: Bihar, New Delhi, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu. We used secondary data sources to estimate the number of under-5 deaths averted from Hib, pneumococcus and rotavirus in each state and back-calculated the total cases averted. We synthesized available data to estimate the disease burden, treatment cost, caretaker productivity loss and vaccine coverage in each state. A Delphi Survey and roundtable among Indian experts was conducted to reach consensus on model inputs. RESULTS: By scaling up coverage of Hib, PCV and RVV, India could save over US$1 billion (uncertainty range: US$0.9-US$2.4 billion) in economic benefits and avert more than 90,000 needless child deaths each year. An estimated US$1 billion (US$0.9-US$2 billion) or 88% of the total amount of cost savings would be attributable to lost productivity due to premature pneumococcal death. Another US$112.8 million (US$105-297 million), or 10% of the total cost would be accounted by costs related to loss of productivity due to disability as a result of these diseases. Treatment costs of Hib, pneumococcal disease and rotavirus gastroenteritis, would account for US$8.4 million (US$4-12 million) or <1% of the total costs of these diseases. Finally, caretaker productivity loss from seeking care would represent US$1.5 million (US$ 1-4.9 million). Cost savings varied by vaccine, coverage scenarios and states. CONCLUSIONS: Hib, PCV and RVV vaccine introduction in India can result in immediate benefits to the government and households in terms of savings.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/economía , Programas de Inmunización , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/economía , Cápsulas Bacterianas , Preescolar , Costo de Enfermedad , Infecciones por Haemophilus/economía , Infecciones por Haemophilus/prevención & control , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , India , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Infecciones Neumocócicas/economía , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones por Rotavirus/economía , Infecciones por Rotavirus/prevención & control , Vacunación , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía
19.
Vaccine ; 37(43): 6282-6284, 2019 10 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31515151

RESUMEN

Recently, the Dutch Health Council advised on elderly pneumococcal vaccination favouring the conventional polysaccharide vaccine over the novel conjugated vaccine. This advice was strongly inspired by a cost-effectiveness analysis considered to show favourable outcomes for the polysaccharide but not for the conjugated vaccine. We argue that using the same data and methods as presented by the Health Council, a different perspective on the results leads to a conclusion that not only the polysaccharide but also the conjugated pneumococcal vaccine is cost-effective. Our alternative perspective concerns the use of realistic vaccine prices, and applying an adequate time horizon for cost-effectiveness modelling. Notably, for one-off vaccination of 65-years old elderly, in all investigated analyses, also the conjugated vaccine seems cost-effective; i.e. well below the threshold of €20,000 per quality-adjusted life year, reflecting the most stringent threshold used for vaccines in the Netherlands.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Neumococicas/economía , Vacunación/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Consejos de Planificación en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Países Bajos , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía
20.
Med Decis Making ; 39(5): 553-567, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31268405

RESUMEN

Background. Despite the introduction of an effective serogroup A conjugate vaccine (MenAfriVac™), sporadic epidemics of other Neisseria meningitidis serogroups remain a concern in Africa. Polyvalent meningococcal conjugate (PMC) vaccines may offer alternatives to current strategies that rely on routine infant vaccination with MenAfriVac plus, in the event of an epidemic, district-specific reactive campaigns using polyvalent meningococcal polysaccharide (PMP) vaccines. Methods. We developed an agent-based transmission model of N. meningitidis in Niger to compare the health effects and costs of current vaccination practice and 3 alternatives. Each alternative replaces MenAfriVac in the infant vaccination series with PMC and either replaces PMP with PMC for reactive campaigns or implements a one-time catch up campaign with PMC for children and young adults. Results. Over a 28-year period, replacement of MenAfriVac with PMC in the infant immunization series and of PMP in reactive campaigns would avert 63% of expected cases (95% prediction interval 49%-75%) if elimination of serogroup A is not followed by serogroup replacement. At a PMC price of $4/dose, this would cost $1412 ($81-$3510) per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted. If serogroup replacement occurs, the cost-effectiveness of this strategy improves to $662 (cost-saving, $2473) per DALY averted. Sensitivity analyses accounting for incomplete laboratory confirmation suggest that a catch-up PMC campaign would also meet standard cost-effectiveness thresholds. Limitations. The assumption that polyvalent vaccines offer similar protection against all serogroups is simplifying. Conclusions. The use of PMC vaccines to replace MenAfriVac in routine infant immunization and in district-specific reactive campaigns would have important health benefits and is likely to be cost-effective in Niger. An additional PMC catch-up campaign would also be cost-effective if we account for incomplete laboratory reporting.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Epidemias/prevención & control , Vacunación Masiva/economía , Meningitis Meningocócica/prevención & control , Meningitis Meningocócica/transmisión , Vacunas Meningococicas/economía , Modelos Estadísticos , Neisseria meningitidis , Humanos , Meningitis Meningocócica/epidemiología , Niger/epidemiología , Vacunas Conjugadas/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...