A prospective, randomized, parallel, active controlled, phase III Indian study of immunogenicity and safety of two inactivated influenza vaccines - Vaxiflu-4 and Fluarix tetra in children aged 6 months to 35 months.

Influenza is highly prevalent in children under five years, particularly those under two, accounting for 5-10% of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in India. This study was conducted to compare the immunogenicity and safety of two tetravalent inactivated influenza vaccines in healthy children aged 6-35 months. The dose recommendation for this group increased from 0.25 mL to 0.5 mL to ensure adequate immune response, as per the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. This Phase III, randomized, single-blind, active-controlled, multicentre study was conducted from May to October 2022 across five centers in India. A total of 346 subjects were randomized to receive two doses of either the test vaccine (Vaxiflu-4, Zydus Lifesciences Limited; n = 174) or the reference vaccine (Fluarix Tetra, GlaxoSmithKline; n = 172). The primary objective was to compare immunogenicity using seroprotection rate, seroconversion rate, and geometric mean titers (GMTs) against four vaccine strains. Safety profiles were also compared. Both vaccines demonstrated non-inferiority, with seroprotection rates over 95%, seroconversion rates above 90%, and significant GMT increases. Adverse events (AEs) were similar for both vaccines, including pain at the injection site, erythema, swelling, and pyrexia. The test vaccine, Vaxiflu-4, showed non-inferiority in terms of immunogenicity and safety when compared with reference vaccine, Fluarix Tetra (Clinical trial registry number: CTRI/2022/05/042514).

Head-to-head comparison of influenza vaccines in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Although vaccination is considered the most effective weapon against influenza, coverage rates, national vaccination policies, and funding vary largely around the globe. Despite their huge potential for achieving herd immunity, child-focused national vaccination strategies that favor pain-free nasal vaccines are uncommon. CENTRAL, Embase, and MEDLINE were last searched on November 13, 2023. Active-controlled randomized controlled trials comparing the live-attenuated intranasal vaccine with the inactivated intramuscular influenza vaccine in children were included. Event rates of laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection, all-cause mortality, hospitalization, serious adverse events, adverse events, and financial outcomes were extracted based on the PRISMA 2020 Guideline. PROSPERO: CRD42021285412. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random-effects model when at least three comparable outcomes were available. We found no significant difference between quadrivalent live-attenuated intranasal and trivalent inactivated intramuscular (OR = 1.48; 95% CI 0.49-4.45) or between trivalent live-attenuated intranasal and inactivated intramuscular vaccines (OR = 0.77, CI = 0.44-1.34) regarding their efficacy. However, the subgroup analysis of large, multi-center trials indicated that the trivalent live attenuated intranasal influenza vaccine was superior to the trivalent inactivated intramuscular influenza vaccine (12,154 people, OR = 0.50, CI = 0.28-0.88). Only 23 "vaccine-related serious adverse events" were recorded among 17 833 individuals, with no significant difference between methods. The widespread initiation of pediatric national flu vaccination programs prioritizing the live-attenuated intranasal influenza vaccine would be beneficial. Multi-continent, high-quality studies that include children younger than two years old and those living in subtropical and tropical regions are needed to further enhance our understanding.

Safety of Simultaneous Vaccination With Adjuvanted Zoster Vaccine and Adjuvanted Influenza Vaccine: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Quadrivalent adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccine (aIIV4) and adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) contain novel adjuvants. Data are limited on the comparative safety, reactogenicity, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) effects of the simultaneous administration of these vaccines. Objective: To compare the safety and reactogenicity after simultaneous doses of RZV and aIIV4 administration (opposite arms) with simultaneous doses of RZV with quadrivalent high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine [HD-IIV4]). Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized blinded clinical trial was conducted during the 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 influenza seasons at 2 centers in the US among community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Intervention: Simultaneous intramuscular administration of RZV dose 1 and aIIV4 or HD-IIV4 in opposite arms after age stratification (65-69 and ≥70 years) and randomization. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportions of participants with 1 or more severe solicited reactions during days 1 to 8, using a noninferiority test (10% noninferiority margin). Additional measures included serious adverse events and adverse events of clinical interest during days 1 to 43 of the study period. Results: A total of 267 adults (median age, 71 years [range, 65-92 years]; 137 men [51.3%]) were randomized; 130 received simultaneous RZV and aIIV4, and 137 received simultaneous RZV and HD-IIV4. The proportion of patients reporting 1 or more severe reactions after simultaneous administration of RZV and aIIV4 (15 of 115 [11.5%]) was noninferior compared with simultaneous RZV and HD-IIV4 (17 of 119 [12.5%]) (absolute difference, -1.0% [95% CI, -8.9% to 7.1%]). There were no significant differences in the number of serious adverse events or adverse events of clinical interest between the groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this clinical trial of simultaneous doses of RZV and aIIV4 compared with simultaneous doses of RZV and HD-IIV4, overall safety findings were similar between groups. From a safety standpoint, this study supports the simultaneous administration of RZV and aIIV4 among older adults. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05007041.

Syncope after live attenuated influenza vaccine: Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (2003-2024).

Vasovagal syncope, or fainting, can be triggered by various stimuli, including medical procedures. Syncope after vaccination has been reported, most commonly among adolescents, and can result in injuries. Using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), we reviewed and summarized reports of syncope after live attenuated influenza vaccine, intranasal (LAIV) administered as the sole vaccine (i.e., no concomitant injections). From June 17, 2003 (date of LAIV licensure in the US) through May 31, 2024, VAERS received 50 reports of syncope after LAIV. Nearly half (23; 46 %) pertained to individuals 10-19 years of age. While the vast majority of reports (35; 70 %) did not describe any injuries, 15 people (30 %) were injured, most commonly by falling and hitting their head or face. Twenty-two people (44 %) required evaluation in the emergency department or doctor's office, including an individual who lost consciousness while he was driving home from the vaccination appointment. He did not report any injuries, but the car was severely damaged. Nearly three-quarters of people (37; 74 %) developed syncope within 15 min after vaccination, but fewer than half of reports (24; 48 %) stated that the patient had waited in the observation area for at 15 min. Based on approximately 111.9 million doses of LAIV distributed in the US during the same time period, the reporting rate is approximately 0.4 per million doses, suggesting that syncope following LAIV is rare. The information summarized here may enable clinicians, patients, and caregivers to make a more informed decision regarding preventing injuries that may occur following LAIV-related syncope.

Immunogenicity and safety of different combinations involving a third booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine, inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine, and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in adults aged ≥60 years: a phase 4, randomized, open-label study.

Background: Concomitant administration of COVID-19, influenza, and pneumococcal vaccines could reduce the burden on healthcare systems. However, the immunogenicity and safety of various combinations of a third booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac), inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4), and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23), particularly in different age groups, is still unknown. Methods: A phase 4, randomized, open-label, controlled trial was conducted in Beijing, China. 636 healthy adults were divided into two age groups (18-59 and ≥60 years) and randomized equally into three groups: CoronaVac and IIV4 followed by PPV23; CoronaVac and PPV23 followed by IIV4; or CoronaVac followed by IIV4 and PPV23, with a 28-day interval between vaccinations. Immunogenicity was evaluated by measuring antibody titers, and safety was monitored. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05298800. Results: Co-administration of a third dose of CoronaVac, IIV4, and PPV23 in any combination was safe. Among adults aged 18-59, co-administration with PPV23 maintained non-inferiority of antibody levels for CoronaVac and IIV4, despite a slight reduction in antibody responses. This reduction was not observed in participants ≥60 years. Furthermore, co-administration of IIV4 and PPV23 affected seroconversion rates for both vaccines. Conclusions: Co-administration of the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine with the influenza vaccine, followed by PPV23, may be optimal for adults aged 18-59. In adults ≥60, all vaccine combinations were immunogenic, suggesting a flexible vaccination approach. Since antibody measurements were taken 28 days post-vaccination, ongoing surveillance is essential to assess the longevity of the immune responses.

Association Between Influenza Vaccination and Acute Kidney Injury Among the Elderly: A Self-Controlled Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Several cases of renal complications, including acute kidney injury (AKI), after influenza vaccination have been reported, but the association remains unproven. We evaluated the association between influenza vaccination and AKI occurrence among the Korean elderly in the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 seasons. METHODS: We used a large database combining vaccination registration data from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency and claims data from the National Health Insurance Service. The study subjects were patients hospitalized with AKI for the first-time following vaccination among those who received one influenza vaccine in the 2018-2019 or 2019-2020 season. Only those aged 65 or older at the date of vaccination were included. We performed a self-controlled case series study, designating the risk period as 1 to 28 days post-vaccination and the observation period as each influenza season. The adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) was calculated by adjusting for nephrotoxic drug use and influenza infection that may influence AKI occurrence using a conditional Poisson regression model. RESULTS: A total of 16 713 and 16 272 AKI events were identified during the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 seasons, respectively. The aIRR for AKI was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79-0.87) in the 2018-2019 season. The aIRR for the 2019-2020 influenza season was similar to the 2018-2019 season (aIRR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.82-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccination is associated with a lower risk of AKI in the elderly over 65. This evidence supports the recommendation of annual influenza vaccination for the elderly. Further studies are needed to determine the biological mechanisms linking the influenza vaccine and AKI.

Safety of the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in 2 Successive Pregnancies.

Importance: Although influenza vaccination has been found to be safe in pregnancy, few studies have assessed repeated influenza vaccination over successive pregnancies, including 2 vaccinations in a year, in terms of adverse perinatal outcomes. Objective: To examine the association of seasonal influenza vaccination across successive pregnancies with adverse perinatal outcomes and whether the association varies by interpregnancy interval (IPI) and vaccine type (quadrivalent or trivalent). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included individuals with at least 2 successive singleton live-birth pregnancies between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2018. Data were collected from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, a collaboration between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and integrated health care organizations. Data analysis was performed between January 8, 2021, and July 17, 2024. Exposures: Influenza vaccination was identified using vaccine administration codes. The vaccinated cohort consisted of people who received influenza vaccines during the influenza season (August 1 through April 30) in 2 successive pregnancies. The comparator cohort consisted of people identified as unvaccinated during both pregnancies. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were risk of preeclampsia or eclampsia, placental abruption, fever, preterm birth, preterm premature rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, and small for gestational age among individuals with and without vaccination in both pregnancies. Adjusted relative risks (RRs) from Poisson regression were used to assess the magnitude of associations. The associations with adverse outcomes by IPI and vaccine type were evaluated. Results: Of 82 055 people with 2 singleton pregnancies between 2004 and 2018, 44 879 (54.7%) had influenza vaccination in successive pregnancies. Mean (SD) age at the start of the second pregnancy was 32.2 (4.6) years for vaccinated individuals and 31.2 (5.0) years for unvaccinated individuals. Compared with individuals not vaccinated in both pregnancies, vaccination in successive pregnancies was not associated with increased risk of preeclampsia or eclampsia (adjusted RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.99-1.21), placental abruption (adjusted RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84-1.21), fever (adjusted RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.47-1.59), preterm birth (adjusted RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.89), preterm premature rupture of membranes (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.94-1.06), chorioamnionitis (adjusted RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.90-1.18), or small for gestational age birth (adjusted RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.05). IPI and vaccine type did not modify the observed associations. Conclusions and Relevance: In this large cohort study of successive pregnancies, influenza vaccination was not associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, irrespective of IPI and vaccine type. Findings support recommendations to vaccinate pregnant people or those who might be pregnant during the influenza season.

Lot-to-lot consistency, immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent split virion inactivated influenza vaccine in healthy population aged 9-59 years: A randomized, double-blind, controlled, phase IV clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study was to assess the lot-to-lot consistency, immunogenicity and safety of three manufacturing lots of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, phase IV clinical trial was conducted in healthy children, adolescents and adults aged 9-59 years in Guizhou Province, China. Eligible participants were enrolled and randomized into three groups in a ratio of 1:1:1 to receive a single dose of one of three manufacturing lots of IIV4. Serum samples were collected before and 28 days after vaccination for hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody testing. Safety data were collected for up to 28 days after vaccination. The primary objective was to evaluate the lot-to-lot consistency of immune response as assessed by the geometric mean titer (GMT) of HI antibody at 28 days after vaccination. RESULTS: Between November 27, 2022 and December 18, 2022, 1260 eligible participants were enrolled, with similar participant demographics among groups. Immune responses after vaccination were comparable across groups, with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of GMT ratios for all 4 strains falling into the equivalence criterion of (0.67, 1.5). The seroconversion rates (SCRs) and seroprotection rates (SPRs) met the US Center or Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) criteria for all strains for each lot (lower limit of 95% CI of SCR ≥ 40% and SPR ≥ 70%). The incidences of solicited and unsolicited adverse reactions were similar among three groups, most of which (91.9%) were mild or moderate in severity. A total of 11 serious adverse events were reported during the study, and all were considered unrelated to vaccination. CONCLUSION: The three manufacturing lots of IIV4 demonstrated consistent immunogenicity. IIV4 can elicit satisfactory immune responses for all four strains and no safety concerns were identified. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Identifier No. NCT05512494.

Humoral immunity and safety of respiratory virus vaccines in systemic lupus erythematosus population: a meta-analysis based on twenty-five observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an extensive autoimmune disorder, compromises viral resistance and alters immune responses post respiratory virus vaccines. This study aims to assess immune response levels and safety in SLE patients following respiratory virus vaccines. METHODS: Extensive searches, until 1 March 2024, were conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Outcomes, encompassing seroconversion rate (SCR), antibody and IgG titers, neutralizing antibodies, anti-spike antibodies, anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG, and adverse events, were appraised. RESULTS: Sixteen articles, comprising 25 observational studies, were included. SLE patients exhibited lower SCR (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.26 to 0.69), antibody titers (SMD=-2.84, 95%CI: -3.36 to -1.61), and neutralizing antibodies (OR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.13 to 0.56) compared to the healthy population post respiratory virus vaccines. Notably, differences were statistically insignificant for anti-RBD IgG (OR = 1.75, 95%CI: 0.10 to 29.42), IgG titers (SMD=-2.54, 95%CI: -5.57 to -0.49), anti-spike antibodies (OR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.08 to 1.53), injection site discomfort (OR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.52 to 2.06), fatigue (OR = 1.23, 95%CI: 0.74 to 2.03), fever (OR = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.64 to 1.63), localized reactions (OR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.37 to 1.30), systemic reactions (OR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.59 to 1.69), allergic reactions (OR = 5.11, 95%CI: 0.24 to 107.10), self-reported vaccination-related adverse events (OR = 1.61, 95%CI: 0.56 to 4.63), and disease flares after vaccination (OR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.14 to 7.28). CONCLUSION: Despite the reduced immune response and host protection in SLE patients post-Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza vaccines compared to the healthy population, safety profiles are comparable. Therefore, it is recommended that SLE patients receive COVID-19 and influenza viral vaccines to fortify their resistance.

Safety and Immunogenicity of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Protein Vaccine when Co-administered with Adjuvanted Seasonal Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults: A Phase 3 Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated co-administration of adjuvanted seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (FLU-aQIV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVPreF3 OA) in ≥65-year-olds. METHODS: This phase 3, open-label trial randomized ≥65-year-olds to receive FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA concomitantly (Co-Ad) or sequentially, 1 month apart (Control). Primary objectives were to demonstrate the non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration in terms of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers for each FLU-aQIV strain and RSV-A and RSV-B neutralization titers, 1 month post-vaccination. Reactogenicity and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 1045 participants were vaccinated (Co-Ad: 523; Control: 522). Non-inferiority of FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA co-administration versus sequential administration was demonstrated in terms of HI titers for the A/Victoria(H1N1), B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata influenza strains and RSV-A neutralization titers (upper limits [ULs] of 95% confidence intervals [CIs] for adjusted geometric mean titer [GMT] ratios [Control/Co-Ad] ≤1.50) but not for A/Darwin(H3N2) HI titers (95% CI UL = 1.53). The immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) was further assessed post-hoc using a microneutralization assay; the post-vaccination adjusted GMT ratio (Control/Co-Ad) was 1.23 (95% CI: 1.06-1.42, ie, UL ≤1.50), suggesting an adequate immune response to A/Darwin(H3N2) following co-administration. RSV-B neutralization titers were comparable between groups (95% CI UL for adjusted GMT ratio ≤1.50). Solicited adverse events were mostly mild or moderate and transient; unsolicited and serious adverse event rates were balanced between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvanted FLU-aQIV and RSVPreF3 OA had acceptable reactogenicity/safety profiles when co-administered in ≥65-year-olds, without clinically relevant interference with the immune responses to either vaccine. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT05568797.

Safety and immunogenicity of the intranasal H3N2 M2-deficient single-replication influenza vaccine alone or coadministered with an inactivated influenza vaccine (Fluzone High-Dose Quadrivalent) in adults aged 65-85 years in the USA: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 1b trial.

BACKGROUND: Older adults (aged ≥65 years) show increased susceptibility to severe disease with influenza virus infection, accounting for 70-85% of annual influenza-related fatalities in the USA. Stimulating mucosal antibodies and T cells might enhance the low vaccine effectiveness seen in older adults for currently licensed inactivated influenza vaccines, which induce mainly serum antibodies. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the intranasal H3N2 M2-deficient single-replication (M2SR) vaccine, alone or coadministered with a licensed inactivated influenza vaccine (Fluzone High-Dose Quadrivalent; hereafter referred to as Fluzone HD), in older adults. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 1b trial, individuals aged 65-85 years who were considered healthy or with stable chronic conditions with no recent (<6 months) influenza vaccinations were recruited from five clinical trial sites in the USA and randomly assigned (3:3:3:1) using a permuted block design to receive the H3N2 M2SR vaccine and Fluzone HD, the H3N2 M2SR vaccine and placebo, Fluzone HD and placebo, or placebo alone. All participants received a single intranasal spray and a single intramuscular injection, whether active or placebo, to maintain masking. The primary outcome was to assess the safety of H3N2 M2SR, administered alone or with Fluzone HD, in the safety analysis set, which included all participants who were randomly assigned and received treatment. Serum and mucosal antibodies were assessed as a secondary endpoint, and cell-mediated immunity as an exploratory endpoint, in participants in the per-protocol population, which included individuals in the safety analysis set without major protocol deviations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05163847. FINDINGS: Between June 14 and Sept 15, 2022, 305 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive the H3N2 M2SR vaccine plus placebo (n=89), H3N2 M2SR vaccine plus Fluzone HD (n=94), Fluzone HD plus placebo (n=92), or placebo alone (n=30). All randomly assigned participants were included in the safety analysis set. The most frequently reported local symptoms up to day 8 in groups that received M2SR were rhinorrhoea (43% [38 of 89] in the H3N2 M2SR plus placebo group and 38% [36 of 94] in the H3N2 M2SR plus Fluzone HD group), nasal congestion (51% [45 of 89] and 35% [33 of 94]), and injection-site pain (8% [seven of 89] and 49% [46 of 94]), and the most frequently reported solicited systemic symptoms were sore throat (28% [25 of 89]) for M2SR and decreased activity (26% [24 of 94]) for the M2SR plus Fluzone HD group. In the Fluzone HD plus placebo group, the most frequently reported local symptom was injection-site pain (48% [44 of 92]) and systemic symptom was muscle aches (22% [20 of 92]). The frequency of participants with any treatment-emergent adverse event related to vaccination was low across all groups (2-5%). One serious adverse event was reported, in a participant in the Fluzone HD plus placebo group. M2SR with Fluzone HD induced seroconversion (≥four-fold increase in haemagglutination inhibition antibodies from baseline to day 29) in 44 (48%) of 91 participants, compared with 28 (31%) of 90 participants who seroconverted in the Fluzone HD plus placebo group (p=0·023). M2SR with Fluzone HD also induced mucosal and cellular immune responses. INTERPRETATION: The H3N2 M2SR vaccine coadministered with Fluzone HD in older adults was well tolerated and provided enhanced immunogenicity compared with Fluzone HD administered alone, suggesting potential for improved efficacy of influenza vaccination in this age group. Additional studies are planned to assess efficacy. FUNDING: US Department of Defense.

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of VIR-2482 in Healthy Adults for Prevention of Influenza A Illness (PENINSULA).

BACKGROUND: Influenza A results in significant morbidity and mortality. VIR-2482, an engineered human monoclonal antibody with extended half-life, targets a highly conserved epitope on the stem region of influenza A hemagglutinin and may protect against seasonal and pandemic influenza. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study examined the safety and efficacy of VIR-2482 for seasonal influenza A illness prevention in unvaccinated healthy adults. Participants (N = 2977) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive VIR-2482 450 mg, VIR-2482 1200 mg, or placebo via intramuscular injection. Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were the proportions of participants with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction-confirmed influenza A infection and either protocol-defined influenza-like illness (ILI) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined ILI or World Health Organization-defined ILI, respectively. RESULTS: VIR-2482 450 mg and 1200 mg prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of protocol-defined ILI with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction-confirmed influenza A versus placebo (relative risk reduction, 3.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), -67.3 to 44.6] and 15.9% [95% CI, -49.3 to 52.3], respectively). At the 1200-mg dose, the relative risk reductions in influenza A illness were 57.2% (95% CI: -2.5 to 82.2) using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ILI and 44.1% (95% CI: -50.5 to 79.3) using World Health Organization ILI definitions, respectively. Serum VIR-2482 levels were similar regardless of influenza status; variants with reduced VIR-2482 susceptibility were not detected. Local injection site reactions were mild and similar across groups. CONCLUSIONS: VIR-2482 1200 mg intramuscular was well tolerated but did not significantly prevent protocol-defined ILI. Secondary endpoint analyses suggest this dose may have reduced influenza A illness. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05567783.

Background incidence rates of health outcomes of interest for COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring in a US population: a claims database analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate background incidence rates of 59 health outcomes of interest (HOI) in a diverse population, including important subpopulations, during the pre-COVID-19 era (1 January 2017-31 December 2019) and the COVID-19 era (1 March 2020-31 December 2020), before the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines. DESIGN: Observational retrospective cohort study. Annual incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of HOIs were estimated for each population of interest, stratified by: age, sex, age and sex and seasonality. DATA SOURCE: Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (CDM). PARTICIPANTS: Individuals from the US general population and four subgroups of interest: influenza-vaccinated, paediatric (<18 years of age), elderly (≥65 years of age) and pregnant women. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 era, the incidence of several cardiac conditions, coagulation disorders and acute liver injury increased across all populations assessed while the rates of some dermatological and neurological HOIs decreased relative to the pre-COVID-19 era. The incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) varied considerably by subgroup: among the elderly, it decreased annually during the pre-COVID-19 era but peaked during the COVID-19 era; among pregnant women, it slightly increased annually during the pre-COVID-19 era and substantially increased during the COVID-19 era; among paediatrics, it decreased annually over the entire study. The incidence of the majority of HOIs increased with age, but were generally comparable between sexes with few exceptions. Cardiac, gastrointestinal, neurological and haematological HOIs, along with acute kidney injury and ARDS, were more common in males, whereas several immunological HOIs and chilblain-like lesions were more common in females. Pregnancy-related HOIs did not increase during the COVID-19 era, except for spontaneous abortions which increased annually over the entire study. CONCLUSION: These observations help contextualise fluctuations in background rates of adverse events noted during the COVID-19 era, and provide insight on how their use may impact safety surveillance for other vaccines.

Stroke After Influenza Vaccines in Older Adults in the US, 2016 to 2019.

This case series investigates whether an increase in stroke risk occurred after influenza vaccination among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries during the influenza seasons from 2016 to 2019.

ATAGI targeted review 2023: Vaccination for preventing influenza in Australia.

Abstract: Annual seasonal influenza epidemics cause substantial disease and economic burden worldwide. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020 and 2021, influenza activity significantly declined. However, influenza resurged in Australia following the relaxation of non-pharmaceutical interventions, with increased influenza virus circulation in early 2022 coinciding with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 variant wave. Together with other respiratory virus diseases, these disease impacts on the Australian population and healthcare system have re-emphasised the importance of influenza vaccination and control. We aim to provide an overview of the current seasonal influenza vaccination program in Australia and summarise evidence and considerations underpinning potential future immunisation strategies. Influenza causes disproportionately higher morbidity and mortality in young children and older adults. Other populations at elevated risk from influenza include Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, pregnant women, and people with certain underlying medical conditions. All Australians aged ≥ 6 months are recommended to receive influenza vaccine every year. The National Immunisation Program (NIP) provides free vaccine for eligible at-risk populations. While approximately 70% of older adults had received influenza vaccine in 2022, coverage in other age groups remains suboptimal. There are several key unmet needs and challenges, but also potential strategies for enhancing the influenza vaccination program in Australia. Improved monitoring and evaluation, including the use of relevant linked datasets for such purposes, is imperative to better understand variations in coverage and vaccination impact in specific populations. Adoption of evidence-based strategies, such as culturally appropriate resources that consider the characteristics of diverse Australian populations, may also help to achieve higher vaccine coverage rates. Additionally, greater vaccine uptake across the population could be facilitated by expanding the NIP-eligible population where cost-effective, and adopting the use of more effective and different types of vaccines when available.

Infection, vaccination and narcolepsy type 1: Evidence and potential molecular mechanisms.

NT1 is a rare, chronic and disabling neurological disease causing excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy. NT1 is characterized pathologically by an almost complete loss of neurons producing the hypocretin (HCRT)/orexin neuropeptides in the lateral hypothalamus. While the exact etiology of NT1 is still unknown, numerous studies have provided compelling evidence supporting its autoimmune origin. The prevailing hypothetical view on the pathogenesis of NT1 involves an immune-mediated loss of HCRT neurons that can be triggered by Pandemrix® vaccination and/or by infection in genetically susceptible patients, specifically carriers of the HLA-DQB1*06:02 MHC class II allele. The molecular mechanisms by which infection/vaccination can induce autoimmunity in the case of NT1 remain to be elucidated. In this review, evidence regarding the involvement of vaccination and infection and the potential mechanisms by which it could be linked to the pathogenesis of NT1 will be discussed in light of the existing findings in other autoimmune diseases.

Vaccine-related influenza virus B infection in a child with an undiagnosed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

We report a case of Influenza type B (lineage Yamagata) infection in a child who received the live attenuated influenza virus vaccine before being diagnosed with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The patient developed a mild disease that persisted for 18 days and resolved without antiviral treatment. The prolonged infection of an attenuated virus in an immunocompromised host might pose a risk of reversion or evolution to a more pathogenic strain. Prompt prevention, identification, and monitoring of similar cases are desirable to avoid the development of severe illness, which could complicate patient management.

Adverse Effects Related to Paediatric Influenza Vaccination and Its Influence on Vaccination Acceptability. The FLUTETRA Study: A Survey Conducted in the Region of Murcia, Spain.

BACKGROUND: During the 2022-23 season, three autonomous communities recommended influenza vaccination for all children between 6 and 59 months. The objective is to evaluate the adverse effects associated with the administered influenza vaccines in the Region of Murcia, as well as their influence on the recommendation of the same to acquaintances or repetition in future seasons. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive study with an online questionnaire sent to the parents of vaccinated minors of 6-23 months of age receiving inactivated intramuscular vaccine (IIV) or 24-59 months of age receiving live-attenuated intranasal vaccine (LAIV). RESULTS: Among 4971 surveys received, the most common adverse effect for LAIV and IIV was runny nose (40.90%) and local pain (31.94%), respectively. Sixty percent of adverse effects lasted ≤ 1 day, and around 10% lasted ≥ 3 days. The interference of adverse effects with the minor's daily life was very infrequent (3.32%), as was the need for visiting the medical office (2.68%). Overall, 96.44% of parents would recommend influenza vaccination to friends and relatives after the experience. Only 3.56% would not recommend it, while 1.68% would not vaccinate their child against influenza again. The most frequently cited reason being adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows the safety of influenza vaccines. Despite the low impact of adverse effects, they influence some parents in their intention to continue vaccinating or recommending it to acquaintances, which remarks the need to reinforce the information given to parents so that this fact does not influence decision-making.