Breaking barriers: supporting hematopoietic stem cell transplant program through collaborative radiation therapy service from a physically distant center.

BACKGROUND: Total body irradiation (TBI) for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) has certain distinct advantages, such as uniform dose distribution and lack of drug resistance, but it is not widely available in resource-constrained settings. To overcome the limitations of in-house radiotherapy services in hematology centers, we evaluated the feasibility of conducting HSCT programs in coordination with two physically distant centers using a reduced-intensity TBI protocol. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with a median age of 20.5 years were included in the study. Fifteen patients were diagnosed with aplastic anemia, 10 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 3 patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), and 4 patients with other hematological conditions. Conditioning regimens used were fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide in 29 cases, fludarabine-cytarabine ATG in 2 cases, and busulfan plus fludarabine in 1 case. The TBI dose was 3 Gy in 28 cases and 2 Gy in 4 cases. Patients were followed monthly after TBI, and the major toxicities were recorded. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 22 months. The most common acute complication was acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which occurred in 15.6% of patients. The major late complications were chronic GVHD (9.3%), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (34.3%), and CMV-induced secondary graft failure (6.2%). Seventy-five percent of patients were alive, 21.9% were dead, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: HSCT based on TBI is feasible even if the center lacks a radiotherapy facility by coordinating with a remote radiotherapy facility. without compromising the patient's outcome.

Outcomes from hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following treosulfan-based conditioning: A clinical and pharmacokinetic analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study are to report our experience with treosulfan-based conditioning regimens for patients with non-malignant hematologic conditions, correlating clinical outcomes at different time points post-transplant with treosulfan exposure (AUC). METHODS: This study was a single-center observational study investigating overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and event-free survival (EFS) end-points post-transplant. The consequences of treosulfan AUC with respect to toxicity, correction of underlying disease, and long-term chimerism were also explored using pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: Forty-six patients received 49 transplants with treosulfan and fludarabine-based conditioning between 2005 and 2023. Twenty-four patients also received thiotepa. Donor chimerism was assessed on either whole blood or sorted cell lines at different time points post-transplant. Thirty-nine patients received treosulfan pharmacokinetic assessment to evaluate cumulative AUC, with five infants receiving real-time assessment to facilitate daily dose adjustment. OS, DFS, and EFS were 87%, 81%, and 69%, respectively. Median follow-up was 32.1 months (range 0.82-160 months) following transplant. Lower EFS was associated with patient age (<1 year; p = .057) and lower cumulative treosulfan dose (<42 g/m2; p = .003). Stable donor chimerism in B-cell, NK-cell, and granulocyte lineages at 1-year post-transplant were more prevalent in patients receiving thiotepa conditioning. Two infants required daily dose adjustment to treosulfan to avoid high AUC. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent clinical outcomes and stable chimerism were observed in this patient series. The addition of thiotepa conferred no significant toxicity and trended toward sustained ongoing donor engraftment. Correlating treosulfan AUC with long-term patient outcomes is required.

Good engraftment after reduced intensity targeted busulfan-based conditioning and matched related donor hematopoietic cell transplantation in hemoglobinopathies.

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an established curative therapy for transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) and sickle cell disease (SCD). The latest American Society of Hematology guidelines recommend myeloablative preparative regimen in patients under 18 years of age. PROCEDURE: The objective was to demonstrate safety and efficacy of a reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen including high-dose fludarabine, anti-thymocyte globulin, and targeted busulfan as a single alkylator to sub-myeloablative exposures. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2021, 11 patients with SCD and five patients with TDT and matched related donor (MRD) HCT were included. The median age at transplantation was 8.3 years (range: 3.7-18.8 years). The median administered busulfan AUC was 67.4 mg/L×h (range: 60.7-80 mg/L×h). Overall survival was 93.8% and event-free survival 87.5% with one engrafted SCD patient with pre-existing moyamoya disease succumbing after drainage of a subdural hematoma. One SCD patient developed a secondary graft failure and was treated with a second HCT. Myeloid chimerism was full in all other patients with a median follow-up time of 4.1 years (range: 2.0-11.1 years), whereas T-cell donor chimerism was frequently mixed. CONCLUSION: This RIC conditioning followed by MRD HCT is sufficiently myeloablative to cure pediatric patients with hemoglobinopathies without the need for additional total body irradiation or thiotepa.

Thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine-based conditioning as a promising approach prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare and aggressive myeloid malignancy associated with a poor prognosis. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has emerged as a potential treatment strategy for BPDCN, standardized conditioning regimens remain lacking. In this manuscript, we present two cases of BPDCN that were treated with a thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine (TBF)-based conditioning regimen prior to allo-HSCT. Both cases demonstrated complete remission post-transplantation, sustained donor chimerism, and remission maintenance, suggesting the potential efficacy of the TBF conditioning regimen for BPDCN transplantation. Given the small sample size in our study, we emphasize caution and advocate for larger studies to confirm the efficacy of TBF in the treatment of BPDCN.

Comparison of Melphalan Dose in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome Undergoing Allogeneic Transplantation with Reduced-Intensity Conditioning.

The present study compared lower-dose melphalan (80 mg/m2, FM80) and higher-dose melphalan (140 mg/m2, FM140) when administering reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine in adult patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We retrospectively analyzed nationwide registry data (2006 to 2019) and compared transplant outcomes between the 2 groups. Ninety-two patients (median age, 61 [interquartile range, 56 to 65] years) were assigned to the FM80 and FM140 groups by propensity score matching. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate in the FM140 group (63.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 52.9% to 73.0%) was significantly higher than that in the FM80 group (54.2%; 95% CI, 37.1% to 52.1%) (P = .038). The FM140 group had a nonsignificantly (P = .095) lower 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (15.5%; 95% CI, 8.9% to 23.8% versus 26.0%; 95% CI, 17.3% to 35.5%). The 3-year cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality were 22.3% (95% CI, 14.1% to 31.8%) and 23.7% (95% CI, 15.4% to 33.2%) in the FM80 and FM140 groups, respectively (P = .49). The beneficial effect of FM140 was more evident in patients with a poor cytogenetic risk. Our findings suggest the superiority of FM140 in patients with MDS undergoing allo-HSCT, especially in high-risk patients.

Impact of Different Fludarabine Doses in the Fludarabine-Based Conditioning Regimen for Unrelated Bone Marrow Transplantation.

The purine analog fludarabine (Flu) plays a central role in reduced-intensity conditioning and myeloablative reduced-toxicity conditioning regimens because of limited nonhematologic toxicities. Few reports assess the impact of different dose of Flu on the clinical outcomes and the Flu doses vary across reports. To compare the effect of Flu dose, the clinical outcomes of patients who received Flu and busulfan (FB; n = 1647) or melphalan (Flu with melphalan (FM); n = 1162) conditioning for unrelated bone marrow transplantation were retrospectively analyzed using Japanese nationwide registry data. In the FB group, high-dose Flu (180 mg/m2; HFB) and low-dose Flu (150/125 mg/m2; LFB) were given to 1334 and 313 patients, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were significantly higher in the HFB group than in the LFB group (49.5% versus 39.2%, P < .001). In the HFB and LFB groups, the cumulative incidences were 30.4% and 36.6% (P = .058) for 3-year relapse and 25.1% and 28.1% (P = .24) for 3-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM), respectively. In the multivariate analysis for OS and relapse, Flu dose was identified as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio: 0.83, P = .03; hazard ratio: 0.80, P = .043). In the FM group, high-dose Flu (180 mg/m2; HFM) and low-dose Flu (150/125 mg/m2; LFM) were given to 118 and 1044 patients, respectively. The OS, relapse, and NRM after 3 years did not differ significantly between the HFM and LFM groups (48.3% versus 48.8%, P = .92; 23.7% versus 27.2%, P = .55; 31.9% versus 30.8%, P = .67). These findings suggest that high-dose Flu was associated with favorable outcomes in the FB group but not in the FM group.

Fludarabine-treosulfan versus fludarabine-melphalan or busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning in older AML or MDS patients - A clinical trial to registry data comparison.

A randomized study (acronym: MC-FludT.14/L Trial II) demonstrated that fludarabine plus treosulfan (30 g/m²) was an effective and well tolerated conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). To further evaluate this regimen, all 252 study patients aged 50 to 70 years were compared with similar patients, who underwent allo-HCT after fludarabine/melphalan (140 mg/m²) (FluMel) or busulfan (12.8 mg/kg)/cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) (BuCy) regimens and whose data was provided by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. In 1:1 propensity-score matched-paired analysis (PSA) of AML patients, there was no difference in 2-year-relapse-incidence after FluTreo compared with either FluMel (n = 110, p = 0.28) or BuCy (n = 78, p = 0.98). However, 2-year-non-relapse-mortality (NRM) was lower compared with FluMel (p = 0.019) and BuCy (p < 0.001). Consequently, 2-year-overall-survival (OS) after FluTreo was higher compared with FluMel (p = 0.04) and BuCy (p < 0.001). For MDS patients, no endpoint differences between FluTreo and FluMel (n = 30) were evident, whereas 2-year-OS after FluTreo was higher compared with BuCy (n = 25, p = 0.01) due to lower 2-year-NRM. Multivariate sensitivity analysis confirmed all significant results of PSA. Consequently, FluTreo (30 g/m²) seems to retain efficacy compared with FluMel and BuCy, but is better tolerated by older patients.

Prognostic differences between carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (BEAM) and carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan and fludarabine (BEAMF) regimens before autologous stem cell transplantation plus chimeric antigen receptor T therapy in patients with refractory/relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin-lymphoma.

BACKGROUND AIMS: The combination therapy of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy has been employed to improve outcomes for relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin-lymphoma (B-NHL). The widely used conditioning regimen before ASCT plus CART therapy reported in the literature was carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (BEAM). However, whether adding fludarabine to the BEAM regimen (BEAMF) can improve the survival of patients with R/R B-NHL remains unknown. METHODS: In total, 39 and 19 patients with R/R B-NHL were enrolled to compare clinical outcomes in the BEAM and BEAMF regimens before ASCT plus CD19/22 CART therapy, respectively. RESULTS: The objective response (OR) rates at 3 months to BEAM and BEAMF regimens before ASCT plus CD19/22 CART therapy were 71.8% and 94.7%, respectively (P = 0.093). The BEAMF regimen showed a trend towards a superior duration of response compared with the BEAM regimen (P = 0.09). After a median follow-up of 28 months (range: 0.93-51.9 months), the BEAMF regimen demonstrated superior 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) (89.5% versus 63.9%; P = 0.048) and 2-year overall survival (OS) (100% vs 77.3%; P = 0.035) compared with the BEAM regimen. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, OR at month 3 (responders) was remarkably correlated with better OS (hazard ratio: 0.112, P = 0.005) compared with OR (non-responders). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with R/R B-NHL, the BEAMF regimen before ASCT plus CD19/22 CART therapy was correlated with superior PFS and OS than the BEAM regimen, and the BEAMF regimen is a promising alternative conditioning regimen for ASCT plus CAR-T therapy.

Busulfan with 400 centigray of total body irradiation and higher dose fludarabine: An alternative regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can be curative for children with difficult-to-treat leukemia. The conditioning regimen utilized is known to influence outcomes. We report outcomes of the conditioning regimen used at the Alberta Children's Hospital, consisting of busulfan (with pharmacokinetic target of 3750 µmol*min/L/day ±10%) for 4 days, higher dose (250 mg/m2 ) fludarabine and 400 centigray (cGy) of total body irradiation. PROCEDURE: This retrospective study involved children receiving transplant for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). It compared children who fell within the target range for busulfan with those who were either not measured or were measured and fell outside this range. All other treatment factors were identical. RESULTS: Twenty-nine children (17 within target) were evaluated. All subjects engrafted neutrophils with a median [interquartile range] time of 14 days [8-30 days]. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease was 44.8% [95% confidence interval, CI: 35.6%-54.0%], while chronic graft-versus-host disease was noted in 16.0% [95% CI: 8.7%-23.3%]. At 2 years, the overall survival was 78.1% [95% CI: 70.8%-86.4%] and event-free survival was 74.7% [95% CI: 66.4%-83.0%]. Cumulative incidence of relapse was 11.3% [95% CI: 5.1%-17.5%]. There were no statistically significant differences in between the group that received targeted busulfan compared with the untargeted group. CONCLUSION: Our conditioning regiment for children with ALL resulted in outcomes comparable to standard treatment with acceptable toxicities and significant reduction in radiation dose. Targeting busulfan dose in this cohort did not result in improved outcomes.

Fludarabine, Cytarabine, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, and Idarubicin With Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin Improves Event-Free Survival in Younger Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML and Overall Survival in Patients With NPM1 and FLT3 Mutations.

PURPOSE: To determine the optimal induction chemotherapy regimen for younger adults with newly diagnosed AML without known adverse risk cytogenetics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to intensified (fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and idarubicin [FLAG-Ida]) or standard (daunorubicin and Ara-C [DA]) induction chemotherapy, with one or two doses of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: There was no difference in remission rate after two courses between FLAG-Ida + GO and DA + GO (complete remission [CR] + CR with incomplete hematologic recovery 93% v 91%) or in day 60 mortality (4.3% v 4.6%). There was no difference in OS (66% v 63%; P = .41); however, the risk of relapse was lower with FLAG-Ida + GO (24% v 41%; P < .001) and 3-year event-free survival was higher (57% v 45%; P < .001). In patients with an NPM1 mutation (30%), 3-year OS was significantly higher with FLAG-Ida + GO (82% v 64%; P = .005). NPM1 measurable residual disease (MRD) clearance was also greater, with 88% versus 77% becoming MRD-negative in peripheral blood after cycle 2 (P = .02). Three-year OS was also higher in patients with a FLT3 mutation (64% v 54%; P = .047). Fewer transplants were performed in patients receiving FLAG-Ida + GO (238 v 278; P = .02). There was no difference in outcome according to the number of GO doses, although NPM1 MRD clearance was higher with two doses in the DA arm. Patients with core binding factor AML treated with DA and one dose of GO had a 3-year OS of 96% with no survival benefit from FLAG-Ida + GO. CONCLUSION: Overall, FLAG-Ida + GO significantly reduced relapse without improving OS. However, exploratory analyses show that patients with NPM1 and FLT3 mutations had substantial improvements in OS. By contrast, in patients with core binding factor AML, outcomes were excellent with DA + GO with no FLAG-Ida benefit.

Comparison of fludarabine-based conditioning regimens in adult cord blood transplantation for myeloid malignancy: A retrospective, registry-based study.

Fludarabine/busulfan and fludarabine/melphalan are viable options as conditioning regimens. However, the optimal fludarabine-based conditioning in cord blood transplantation (CBT) remains unclear. Therefore, this retrospective, registry-based study aimed to analyze the impact of five fludarabine-containing conditioning regimens on 1395 adult patients (median age, 61 years) with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and chronic myeloid leukemia who underwent their first CBT. Treatment outcomes of fludarabine combined with melphalan (100-140 mg/m2 ) and low-dose total body irradiation (TBI; FM140T); melphalan (80-99 mg/m2 ) and TBI (FM80T); busulfan (12.8 mg/kg) and melphalan (FB4M); busulfan (12.8 mg/kg) and TBI (FB4T); and busulfan (6.4 mg/kg) and TBI (FB2T) were compared. The 3-year survival rate was 67%, 53%, 44%, 36%, and 39%, respectively (p < .0001). The FM140T survival rate was the most favorable after adjusting for confounders, and the hazard ratios (vs. FM140T) for overall mortality were as follows: FM80T, 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.2); FB4M, 2.1 (95% CI, 1.6-2.8); FB4T, 2.7 (95% CI, 2.0-3.7); and FB2T, 2.2 (95% CI, 1.6-3.1). The better survival observed with FM140T, regardless of the disease, disease risk, age, or transplant year, was attributed to the lower relapse rate and lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) associated with fewer infectious deaths. Conversely, FB4T was associated with a higher relapse rate and higher NRM. The findings indicate that the outcomes of CBT in myeloid malignancies were highly dependent on both the alkylating agent and its dose in combination with fludarabine. Therefore, compared with fludarabine/busulfan-based conditioning, FM140T may be the preferred regimen.

Treosulfan vs busulfan conditioning for allogeneic bmt in children with nonmalignant disease: a randomized phase 2 trial.

Optimal conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for children with non-malignant diseases is subject of ongoing research. This prospective, randomized, phase 2 trial compared safety and efficacy of busulfan with treosulfan based preparative regimens. Children with non-malignant diseases received fludarabine and either intravenous (IV) busulfan (4.8 to 3.2 mg/kg/day) or IV treosulfan (10, 12, or 14 g/m2/day). Thiotepa administration (2 × 5 mg/kg) was at the investigator's discretion. Primary endpoint was freedom from transplantation (treatment)-related mortality (freedom from TRM), defined as death between Days -7 and +100. Overall, 101 patients (busulfan 50, treosulfan 51) with at least 12 months follow-up were analyzed. Freedom from TRM was 90.0% (95% CI: 78.2%, 96.7%) after busulfan and 100.0% (95% CI: 93.0%, 100.0%) after treosulfan. Secondary outcomes (transplantation-related mortality [12.0% versus 3.9%]) and overall survival (88.0% versus 96.1%) favored treosulfan. Graft failure was more common after treosulfan (n = 11), than after busulfan (n = 2) while all patients were rescued by second procedures except one busulfan patient. CTCAE Grade III adverse events were similar in both groups. This study confirmed treosulfan to be an excellent alternative to busulfan and can be safely used for conditioning treatment in children with non-malignant disease.

Busulfan-fludarabine- or treosulfan-fludarabine-based conditioning before allogeneic HSCT from matched sibling donors in paediatric patients with sickle cell disease: A study on behalf of the EBMT Paediatric Diseases and Inborn Errors Working Parties.

How important is choice of conditioning regimen in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for sickle cell disease (SCD)? We compared HSCT outcomes by conditioning regimen in paediatric patients with SCD from the EBMT registry. In 2010-2020, 251 patients aged <18 years underwent a first matched sibling donor (MSD) HSCT with conditioning based on busulfan-fludarabine (bu-flu; n = 89) or treosulfan-fludarabine (treo-flu; n = 162). In the bu-flu and treo-flu groups, 51.7% and 99.4% of patients, respectively, received thiotepa. Median follow-up was 2.7 years. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 98.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 90.9-99.8) with bu-flu and 99.3% (95% CI: 95.2-99.9) with treo-flu (p = 0.63). Grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 100 days was 2.4% (95% CI: 0.4-7.5) and 0.6% (0.1%-3.2%) for bu-flu and treo-flu respectively (p = 0.25). The 2-year incidence of extensive chronic GVHD was 1.5% (95% CI: 0.1-7.3) with bu-flu and 8.0% (95% CI: 4.1-13.3) with treo-flu (p = 0.057). These multinational data confirm the excellent curative capacity of MSD HSCT with myeloablative conditioning. Both conditioning regimens yielded excellent OS, low rates of acute and chronic GVHD, and low rates of graft failure.

del(8p) and TNFRSF10B loss are associated with a poor prognosis and resistance to fludarabine in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a heterogeneous disease, the prognosis of which varies according to the cytogenetic group. We characterized a rare chromosomal abnormality (del(8p), deletion of the short arm of chromosome 8) in the context of CLL. By comparing the largest cohort of del(8p) CLL to date (n = 57) with a non-del(8p) cohort (n = 155), del(8p) was significantly associated with a poor prognosis, a shorter time to first treatment, worse overall survival (OS), and a higher risk of Richter transformation. For patients treated with fludarabine-based regimens, the next-treatment-free survival and the OS were shorter in del(8p) cases (including those with mutated IGHV). One copy of the TNFRSF10B gene (coding a pro-apoptotic receptor activated by TRAIL) was lost in 91% of del(8p) CLL. TNFRSF10B was haploinsufficient in del(8p) CLL, and was involved in the modulation of fludarabine-induced cell death - as confirmed by our experiments in primary cells and in CRISPR-edited TNFRSF10B knock-out CLL cell lines. Lastly, del(8p) abrogated the synergy between fludarabine and TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Our results highlight del(8p)'s value as a prognostic marker and suggest that fit CLL patients (i.e. with mutated IGHV and no TP53 disruption) should be screened for del(8p) before the initiation of fludarabine-based treatment.

Fludarabine/TBI 8 Gy versus fludarabine/treosulfan conditioning in patients with AML in first complete remission: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT.

The optimal reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen is a matter of debate. We retrospectively compared conditioning with fludarabine plus fractionated total body irradiation of 8 Gy (FluTBI) and fludarabine plus treosulfan 30, 36 or 42 g/m2 (FluTreo) in 754 patients with AML above the age of 40 years undergoing an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in first complete remission (CR). After balancing patient characteristics by propensity score matching of 115 patients in each group, FluTBI was associated with a significantly lower probability of relapse compared to FluTreo (18.3% vs. 34.7%, p = 0.018) which was counteracted by a higher non-relapse mortality (NRM, 16.8% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.02). Thus, overall survival and graft-versus-host disease-free and relapse-free survival at 2 years were similar between groups (OS 66.9% vs. 67.8%, GRFS 50.3% vs. 45.6%). Univariate analysis by age group demonstrated a higher NRM exclusively in patients ≥55 years of age treated with FluTBI compared to FluTreo (27.6% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.02), while a similarly low NRM was observed in patients <55 years in both groups (6.0% vs. 4.7%, p = ns). We conclude that both conditioning regimens are effective and safe, but FluTBI may better be reserved for younger patients below the age of 55 years.