Evaluating fingerprint-like patterns in the healthy Henle fiber layer using enface OCT imaging.

PURPOSE: Enface OCT may disclose a distinct "fingerprint-like' pattern within the HFL in various macular disorders. This study aims to investigate the frequency and characteristics of this pattern in healthy eyes and identify potential factors influencing its visibility. METHODS: Two, independent masked reading center graders evaluated for the presence and prominence of a fingerprint pattern in the Henle fiber layer (HFL) on enface OCT images from 33 healthy subjects (66 eyes). The prominence of the pattern was rated qualitatively using a 0-3 scale, with 3 indicating the strongest prominence. Tilt angles (relative to the normal/perpendicular at the center) of the retina were measured on horizontal and vertical B-scans, and the retinal curvature was assessed using ImageJ, in order to determine the impact of the incident light angle on the visibility and prominence of the fingerprint pattern. Inter-grader agreement using Cohen's kappa and the frequency and percentage of patterns in the entire enface image and in each quadrant were calculated and compared using the Friedman test with Dunn's post-test. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to analyze the association between these metrics and fingerprint prominence. RESULTS: Substantial inter-grader agreement was observed (Cohen's kappa = 0.71) for assessing the prominence of the fingerprint pattern. Over 70% of eyes exhibited some evidence of the pattern (score ≥1). Significant difference in pattern prominence across quadrants was detected (p < 0.05), with lowest prominence in the temporal quadrant (p < 0.001 for pairwise comparisons against all other quadrants). The GEE analysis to account for the extent of the effect of scan tilt angle and RPE curvature was not able to predict the prominence of the fingerprint pattern, highlighting that angle of incidence (of the scanning laser light) alone could not explain the pattern. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that a fingerprint-like pattern within the HFL can also be observed in healthy eyes, challenging the notion that this finding is only manifest in the setting of disease. In addition, the lack of correlation with angle of incident light suggests that the pattern may be related to other intrinsic characteristics of the HFL.

Comparison of Blue-Light Autofluorescence and Ultrawidefield Green-Light Autofluorescence for Assessing Geographic Atrophy.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to evaluate and compare the intermodality and interreader agreement of manual and semiautomated geographic atrophy (GA) area measurements in eyes with GA due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using conventional blue-light fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and ultrawidefield (UWF) green-light FAF systems. DESIGN: Prospective Cohort Study. SUBJECTS: Seventy-two eyes of 50 patients with a diagnosis of advanced nonneovascular AMD with GA. METHODS: Fundus autofluorescence images of eyes with GA were obtained during a single visit using both the Spectralis HRA + OCT2 device and the Optos California device. The area of the GA lesion(s) was segmented and quantified (mm2) with a fully manual approach where the lesions were outlined using Optos Advance and Heidelberg Eye Explorer (HEYEX) software. In addition, for the Heidelberg blue FAF images, GA lesions were also measured using the instrument's semiautomated software (Region Finder 2.6.4). For comparison between modalities/grading method, the mean values of the 2 graders were used. Intraclass correlation coefficients were computed to judge the agreement between graders. RESULTS: Seventy-two eyes of 50 patients were included in this study. There was nearly perfect agreement between graders for the measurement of GA area for all 3 modalities (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.996 for manual Optos Advance, 0.996 for manual Heidelberg HEYEX, and 0.995 for Heidelberg Region Finder). The measurement of GA area was strongly correlated between modalities, with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.985 (P < 0.001) between manual Heidelberg and manual Optos, 0.991 (P < 0.001) for Region Finder versus manual Heidelberg, and 0.985 (P < 0.001) for Region Finder versus manual Optos. The absolute mean area differences between the Heidelberg manual versus Region Finder, manual Optos versus Region Finder, and manual Optos versus manual Heidelberg were 1.61 mm2 (P < 0.001), 0.90 mm2 (P < 0.006), and 0.71 mm2 (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We observed excellent interreader agreement for measurement of GA using either 30-degree blue-light FAF or UWF green-light FAF, establishing the reliability of UWF imaging for macular GA assessment. Although the absolute measurements between devices were strongly correlated, they differed significantly, highlighting the importance of using the same device for a given patient for the duration of a study. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Predictive Factors Influencing the Evolution of Acquired Vitelliform Lesions in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration Eyes.

PURPOSE: In this study, we identify risk factors that predict the progression of acquired vitelliform lesions (AVLs) over time. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: One hundred sixty-three eyes of 132 patients with a diagnosis of intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD) with AVL. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated consecutive eyes with AMD from a retina clinic population and included 1181 patients and 2362 eyes. After excluding cases with associated geographic atrophy, macular neovascularization (MNV), vitreomacular traction, and those with <2 years of follow-up data, the final analysis cohort consisted of 163 eyes (132 patients) with ≥1 AVL. The first available visit in which an AVL was evident was considered the baseline visit, and follow-up data were collected from a visit 2 years (± 3 months) later. Progression outcomes at the follow-up visit were classified into 6 categories: resorbed, collapsed, MNV, stable, increasing, and decreasing. Subsequently, we analyzed the baseline characteristics for each category and calculated odds ratios (ORs) to predict these various outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The study focused on identifying predictive factors influencing the evolution of AVL in iAMD eyes. RESULTS: In total, 163 eyes with AVL had follow-up data at 2 years. The collapsed group demonstrated a significantly greater baseline AVL height and width compared with other groups (P < 0.001). With regard to qualitative parameters, subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDDs) and intraretinal hyperreflective foci (IHRF) at the eye level, AVL located over drusen, and IHRF and external limiting membrane disruption over AVL were significantly more prevalent in the collapsed group compared with other groups (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Odds ratios for progressing to atrophy after 2 years of follow-up, compared with the resorbed group, were significant for SDD (OR, 2.82; P = 0.048) and AVL height (OR, 1.016; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of SDDs and greater AVL height significantly increases the risk of developing atrophy at the location of AVL after 2 years of follow-up. These findings may be of value in risk prognostication and defining patient populations for inclusion in future early intervention trials aimed at preventing progression to atrophy. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.