Surgical treatment of chronic achilles tendon rupture: An anatomical consideration of various autograft options.

Background: Acute Achilles tendon rupture is a common injury and when missed leads to the development of a chronic Achilles tendon rupture. Studies suggest surgical treatment (either repair or reconstruction) for most patients with a chronic Achilles rupture due to the functional deficit caused by the lack of an intact Achilles tendon. Numerous autograft options such as the flexor hallucis longus, hamstrings, peroneal and quadriceps tendon have been used to reconstruct the Achilles tendon, either as a tendon transfer or as an interposition graft. The choice of autograft used usually depends on the size of the defect left after debridement of the Achilles tendon edges, but is often dictated by surgeon preference and tissue availability. Currently, there is no consensus as to the best autograft option. Aims and methodology: The aim of this study was to evaluate the various autograft options used to reconstruct the Achilles tendon, and the advantages and disadvantages of using each tendon, focussing specifically on the harvesting technique, anatomical and biomechanical properties. This was done by reviewing the current published literature, supplemented by carrying out anatomical dissection in the cadaveric lab. Results: The flexor hallucis longus is synergistically related to the Achilles tendon and biomechanically strong, however harvesting can result in weakness in big toe flexion. The peroneus brevis whilst being biomechanically strong is a much shorter tendon compared to the other autograft options. Similarly, the quadriceps tendon is also a strong tendon option, but may not be appropriate for larger chronic Achilles tendon rupture gaps. The semitendinosus tendon can be tripled/quadrupled to resemble the Achilles tendon, but is associated with higher risks of patient morbidity when harvesting the tendon. Conclusion: Treatment of chronic Achilles tendon ruptures remains a challenge. Each autograft option has its own unique advantages and disadvantages which should be considered on a case-specific basis. Further work is required to analyse the biomechanical properties of the autograft options to determine if one option is superior.

The influence of the site of rupture and gap distance in acute Achilles tendon rupture treated with functional rehabilitation.

AIM: To determine the influence of gap distance and its location on clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with acute rupture of Tendo-Achilles (TA) treated non-operatively with functional rehabilitation. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with acute complete TA rupture underwent ultrasound (US) scanning within a week of their injury. The measurements taken included the distance of the rupture from the enthesis and the gap distance between the tendon edges in varying degrees of ankle and knee positions. All patients were managed non-operatively in functional weight-bearing orthoses. Nineteen patients were then followed up at a mean of 6.1 years (range 5.8-6.5) to assess their clinical and radiological outcomes. The outcomes included ultrasound assessment of tendon healing, Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS) and modified Leppilahti Score (mLS). RESULTS: In the initial ultrasound, the mean distance of the rupture from the enthesis was 52 mm (range: 40-76). The mean gap distance with the foot plantigrade was 11.4 mm, which reduced to 4.8 mm with the foot in equinus. At final follow up, no re-ruptures had occurred. The mean ATRS and mLS were 86 and 71 respectively. There was a significant correlation between the distance of the rupture from the enthesis with the MLS total score (p = 0.02), mLS Fatigue domain score (p = 0.03), and the ATRS domains of strength (p = 0.04) and fatigue (p = 0.02). There was no significant correlation between the measured gap distance with respect to the mLS, ATRS or individual ATRS domain scores. Also, there was no significant difference in ATRS and mLS outcomes when comparing tendons with respect to healed tissue appearance and fibre orientation on ultrasound. CONCLUSION: The initial gap distance had no relationship with any of the measured clinical outcomes at the final follow up. The distance of the gap from the enthesis, however, may carry a greater prognostic value following non-operative treatment of Achilles tendon injuries.

Can low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) be used as an alternative to revision surgery for patients with non-unions following fracture fixation?

BACKGROUND: Non-union is a significant complication of fracture fixation surgery, and can negatively impact a patient's quality of life. Low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) has been used to treat delayed or non-unions previously in the literature. The aim of this study was to determine the success rate of LIPUS treatment in patients with chronic fracture non-unions, and to establish the effect of systemic or local factors on its success. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study which included all patients undergoing LIPUS treatment in a single institution. Patients deemed suitable for LIPUS underwent treatment for a period of 6 months from initiation. They were followed up with sequential radiographs to assess union at intervals of 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. LIPUS treatment was considered to be successful when patients achieved clinical and radiological union, without the need for revision surgery. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were included in the study; 8 were lost to follow - up, leaving 38 patients for the final analysis. The mean age of patients was 47.03 ± 19.7 with a male to female ratio of 1.2:1. Union was achieved in 57.89%; the rest underwent revision surgery. There was no significant association between outcomes after LIPUS treatment and patients' age, gender, smoking status or type of non-union. Patients with a small inter-fragment bone gap were more likely to have a successful outcome after LIPUS (p = 0.041). Time to treatment did not have a statistically significant impact on outcomes after LIPUS. Interestingly, all 6 patients with diabetes in the study managed to achieve union after LIPUS. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that LIPUS is not successful in a large proportion of patients with established fracture non-unions. However, it does represent a low risk treatment modality as an alternative to revision surgery, especially for patients with diabetes who have a small inter - fragment bone gap. More research in the form of large randomised controlled trials needs to be carried out to further assess the role of LIPUS in the treatment of non-unions.

Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy: Functional Outcomes after Surgery.

Aims Rectal prolapse is a debilitating and unpleasant condition adversely affecting the quality of life. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is recognized as one of the treatment options. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes after a standardized LVMR. Methods A cohort of patients who underwent LVMR from 2011 to 2015 were contacted and asked to fill questionnaires about their symptoms before and after the surgery. Three questionnaires based on measurement of Wexner fecal incontinence (WFI), obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS), and Birmingham Bowel and Urinary Symptom (BBUS) scores were used to assess the changes in postoperative functional outcomes. Some additional questions were also added to further assess bowel dysfunction. Results There were 58 female patients with a mean age of 62.74 ± 15.20 (26-86) years in this cohort. About 70% of the patients participated in the study and returned the filled questionnaires. There was a significant overall improvement across all three scores (WFI: p = 0.001, ODS: p = 0.001, and BBUS: p = 0.001). Some individual components in the scoring systems did not improve to patient's satisfaction. No perioperative complication or conversion to an open procedure was reported in this study. Three recurrences were seen in the redo cases. Conclusion LVMR is a promising way of dealing with rectal prolapse. A careful patient selection, appropriate preoperative workup, and a meticulous surgical technique undoubtedly transform the postoperative outcomes.